Vision: Version
Vision: Version
Vision: Version
<Project Name>
Vision
Version <1.0>
[Note: The following template is provided for use with the Rational Unified Process. Text enclosed in square
brackets and displayed in blue italics (style=InfoBlue) is included to provide guidance to the author and should be
deleted before publishing the document. A paragraph entered following this style will automatically be set to normal
(style=Body Text).]
[To customize automatic fields in Microsoft Word (which display a gray background when selected), select
File>Properties and replace the Title, Subject and Company fields with the appropriate information for this
document. After closing the dialog, automatic fields may be updated throughout the document by selecting
Edit>Select All (or Ctrl-A) and pressing F9, or simply click on the field and press F9. This must be done separately
for Headers and Footers. Alt-F9 will toggle between displaying the field names and the field contents. See Word
help for more information on working with fields.]
<Project Name> Version: <1.0>
Vision Date: <dd/mmm/yy>
<document identifier>
Revision History
Date Version Description Author
<dd/mmm/yy> <x.x> <details> <name>
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 5
1.1 Purpose 5
1.2 Scope 5
1.3 Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 5
1.4 References 5
1.5 Overview 5
2. Positioning 5
2.1 Business Opportunity 5
2.2 Problem Statement 5
2.3 Product Position Statement 5
4. Product Overview 5
4.1 Product Perspective 5
4.2 Summary of Capabilities 5
4.3 Assumptions and Dependencies 5
4.4 Cost and Pricing 5
4.5 Licensing and Installation 5
5. Product Features 5
5.1 <aFeature> 5
5.2 <anotherFeature> 5
6. Constraints 5
7. Quality Ranges 5
A Feature Attributes 5
A.1 Status 5
A.2 Benefit 5
A.3 Effort 5
A.4 Risk 5
A.5 Stability 5
A.6 Target Release 5
A.7 Assigned To 5
A.8 Reason 5
Vision
1. Introduction
[The purpose of this document is to collect, analyze, and define high-level needs and features of the <<System
Name>>. It focuses on the capabilities needed by the stakeholders and the target users, and why these needs exist.
The details of how the <<System Name>> fulfills these needs are detailed in the use-case and supplementary
specifications.]
[The introduction of the Vision document provides an overview of the entire document. It includes the purpose,
scope, definitions, acronyms, abbreviations, references, and overview of this Vision document.]
1.1 Purpose
[Specify the purpose of this Vision document.]
1.2 Scope
[A brief description of the scope of this Vision document; what Project(s) it is associated with and anything else
that is affected or influenced by this document.]
1.4 References
[This subsection provides a complete list of all documents referenced elsewhere in the Vision document. Identify
each document by title, report number if applicable, date, and publishing organization. Specify the sources from
which the references can be obtained. This information may be provided by reference to an appendix or to another
document.]
1.5 Overview
[This subsection describes what the rest of the Vision document contains and explains how the document is
organized.]
2. Positioning
2.1 Business Opportunity
[Briefly describe the business opportunity being met by this project.]
[Name [Briefly describe [List the user’s key responsibilities [If the user is not directly
the user what they represent with regard to the system being represented, identify which
type.] with respect to the developed; for example: stakeholder is responsible for
system.] representing the user’s
- captures details
interest.]
- produces reports
- coordinates work
- and so on]
Comments / Issues [Problems that interfere with success and any other relevant information go here.]
3.8.1 <aCompetitor>
3.8.2 <anotherCompetitor>
4. Product Overview
[This section provides a high level view of the product capabilities, interfaces to other applications, and system
configurations. This section usually consists of three subsections, as follows:
• Product perspective
• Product functions
• Assumptions and dependencies]
5. Product Features
[List and briefly describe the product features. Features are the high-level capabilities of the system that are
necessary to deliver benefits to the users. Each feature is an externally desired service that typically requires a
series of inputs to achieve the desired result. For example, a feature of a problem tracking system might be the
ability to provide trending reports. As the use-case model takes shape, update the description to refer to the use
cases.
Because the Vision document is reviewed by a wide variety of involved personnel, the level of detail needs to be
general enough for everyone to understand. However, enough detail must be available to provide the team with the
information they need to create a use-case model.
To effectively manage application complexity, we recommend for any new system, or an increment to an existing
system, capabilities are abstracted to a high enough level so 25-99 features result. These features provide the
fundamental basis for product definition, scope management, and project management. Each feature will be
expanded in greater detail in the use-case model.
Throughout this section, each feature will be externally perceivable by users, operators or other external systems.
These features need to include a description of functionality and any relevant usability issues that must be
addressed. The following guidelines apply:
• Avoid design. Keep feature descriptions at a general level. Focus on capabilities needed and why (not how)
they should be implemented.
• If you are using the Rational RequisitePro toolkit, all need to be selected as requirements of type for easy
reference and tracking.]
5.1 <aFeature>
5.2 <anotherFeature>
6. Constraints
[Note any design constraints, external constraints or other dependencies.]
7. Quality Ranges
[Define the quality ranges for performance, robustness, fault tolerance, usability, and similar characteristics that
are not captured in the Feature Set.]
A Feature Attributes
[Features are given attributes that can be used to evaluate, track, prioritize, and manage the product items
proposed for implementation. All requirement types and attributes need to be outlined in the Requirements
Management Plan, however, you may wish to list and briefly describe the attributes for features that have been
chosen. The following subsections represent a set of suggested feature attributes.]
A.1 Status
[Set after negotiation and review by the project management team. Tracks progress during definition of the project
baseline.]
Proposed [Used to describe features that are under discussion but have not yet
been reviewed and accepted by the "official channel," such as a
working group consisting of representatives from the project team,
product management, and user or customer community.]
Approved [Capabilities that are deemed useful and feasible, and have been
approved for implementation by the official channel.]
Incorporated [Features incorporated into the product baseline at a specific point
in time.]
A.2 Benefit
[Set by Marketing, the product manager or the business analyst. All requirements are not created equal. Ranking
requirements by their relative benefit to the end user opens a dialog with customers, analysts, and members of the
development team. Used in managing scope and determining development priority.]
Critical [Essential features. Failure to implement means the system will not meet
customer needs. All critical features must be implemented in the release
or the schedule will slip.]
Important [Features important to the effectiveness and efficiency of the system for
most applications. The functionality cannot be easily provided in some
other way. Lack of inclusion of an important feature may affect
customer or user satisfaction, or even revenue, but release will not be
delayed due to lack of any important feature.]
Useful [Features that are useful in less typical applications will be used less
frequently or for which reasonably efficient workarounds can be
achieved. No significant revenue or customer satisfaction impact can be
expected if such an item is not included in a release.]
A.3 Effort
[Set by the development team. Because some features require more time and resources than others, estimating the
number of team or person-weeks, lines of code required or function points, for example, is the best way to gauge
complexity and set expectations of what can and cannot be accomplished in a given time frame. Used in managing
scope and determining development priority.]
A.4 Risk
[Set by development team based on the probability the project will experience undesirable events, such as cost
overruns, schedule delays or even cancellation. Most project managers find categorizing risks, as high, medium,
and low, is sufficient, although finer gradations are possible. Risk can often be indirectly assessed by measuring the
uncertainty (range) of the projects team’s schedule estimate.]
A.5 Stability
[Set by the analyst and development team, this is based on the probability that features will change or the team’s
understanding of the feature will change. Used to help establish development priorities and determine those items
for which additional elicitation is the appropriate next action.]
A.7 Assigned To
[In many projects, features will be assigned to "feature teams" responsible for further elicitation, writing the
software requirements, and implementation. This simple pull-down list will help everyone on the project team to
understand responsibilities better.]
A.8 Reason
[This text field is used to track the source of the requested feature. Requirements exist for specific reasons. This field
records an explanation or a reference to an explanation. For example, the reference might be to a page and line
number of a product requirement specification or to a minute marker on a video of an important customer review.]