Module 5 Week 7 and Week 8 PURPOSIVE COMM Final - Edited
Module 5 Week 7 and Week 8 PURPOSIVE COMM Final - Edited
Module 5 Week 7 and Week 8 PURPOSIVE COMM Final - Edited
LEARNING TARGETS/GOALS
ENGAGE
EXPLAIN
In a supermarket, a sales agent makes sure that the way a product is promoted gets consumers buying. A news
anchor delivers information in such a way that all the facts are clearly stated doing away with words that may
confuse. On the other hand, a criminal lawyer must design his arguments supported by facts to convince the
judge and the jury. 30 Purposive Communication
Informative Communication involves giving than asking. As an informative communicator, you want
your receivers to pay attention and understand, but not to change their behavior. By sharing information,
ignorance is reduced, or better yet, eliminated. The informative value of a message is measured by how novel
and relevant the information is or the kind of understanding it provides to the receivers.
Osborn (2009) purports that informative communication arises out of three deep impulses:
a. We seek to expand our awareness of the world around us.
LEARNING PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA
MODULE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
University Road, Poblacion, Muntinlupa City
QR/CBA/0__
Course Title: PURPOSIVE COMMUNICATION
Issue No. 0 Revision No. 0 Effectivity Date 7 September 2020 Page No.
b. We seek to become more competent.
c. We have an abiding curiosity about how things work and how they are made.
When preparing for an informative exchange, ask yourself the following questions:
1. Is my topic noteworthy to be considered informative?
2. What do my recipients already know about my topic?
3. What more do they have to know?
4. Am I knowledgeable enough of my topic to help my receivers understand it?
Persuasive Communication is an art of gaining fair and favorable considerations for our point of view.
a. provides a choice among options.
b. advocates something through a speaker.
c. uses supporting material to justify advice.
d. turns the audience into agents of change.
e. asks for strong audience commitment.
f. gives importance to the speaker's credibility.
g. appeals to feelings.
h. has a higher ethical obligation.
Argumentative Communication relies heavily on soundproof and reasoning. The nature of proof has been
studied since the Golden Age of Greece and has been improved through time. According to Aristotle, logos,
ethos, and pathos are the three primary forms of proof. In our time, whoever, many scholars have confirmed the
presence of the fourth dimension of proof, mythos, which suggests that we respond to appeals to the traditions
and values of our culture and to the legends and folktales that embody them.
Lucas (2007) claims that to avoid defective argumentation, the following must be avoided:
1. Defective evidence
• Misuse of facts
• Statistical fallacies
•Defective Testimony
•Inappropriate evidence
2. Defective Patterns of Reasoning
• Evidential fallacies - Evidential fallacies arise from a
misunderstanding of the nature of evidence, or from a disparity in the
strength of one's belief/disbelief and the degree of evidence supporting
that belief/disbelief.
• Flawed proofs
Ad hominem
Attempting to tie the validity of your opponent's argument to his credibility rather than its intrinsic
merits
Begging the question
The argument fails to prove anything because it applies what it is supposed to prove as fact. This is also
known as circular logic.
• Defective arguments
Shaky principle
Basing a line of argument on an unsound assumption.
Omitted qualifiers
Confusing probability with certainty by asserting a conclusion without qualification.
Post Hoc
A occurred before B, thus A caused B
Non sequitur
Reasoning in which principles and observations are unrelated to each other or the conclusion drawn.
Hasty generalization
Concluding a limited observational pool, or conclusion based on insufficient or non-representative
observations.
Faulty analogy
LEARNING PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MUNTINLUPA
MODULE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
University Road, Poblacion, Muntinlupa City
QR/CBA/0__
Course Title: PURPOSIVE COMMUNICATION
Issue No. 0 Revision No. 0 Effectivity Date 7 September 2020 Page No.
An analogy which does not apply to the situation in question
The Choice Of Mode Of Speech Delivery is determined by factors such as length of preparation, the
complexity of the message, purpose, and occasion.
Extemporaneous speaking may have a short or a long preparation. The speaker may use an outline to guide
him through his speech to achieve better organization and to avoid leaving out details. But unlike reading,
extemporaneous speaking necessitates the speaker to formulate his sentences while he is speaking.
Extemporaneous is a method that most lecturers and teachers use. A good extemporaneous speaker must be
spontaneous.
Impromptu means speaking at the spur of the moment. Since there is very minimal or no time for preparation
given for impromptu, the content and organization may suffer. Impromptu may not deliver the best thought in
the best way but it brings out the most natural thing to say at the moment.
6 Ways To Turn Nervousness From A Negative Force Into A Positive Force (Lucas, 2015)
A. Acquire speaking experience
B. Prepare, prepare, prepare.
C. Think positively.
D. Use the power of visualization.
E. Know that most nervousness is not visible.
F. Do not expect perfection.
TAKEAWAYS
Remember these!
Directions: Manage your takeaways from this lesson by completing the following statements: (5points)
EVALUATE
REFERENCES
Books:
Geraldine Wakat, Analyn Caroy, Fred Paulino, et al. Purposive Commication (2018) published by
Rex Bookstore
Leomar S. Galicia, Nerissa C. Gabelo, Janaet B. Oab, et al. Purposive Communication (2018)
published by Panday Lahi
Web sources: