Plan Shouf Reserve
Plan Shouf Reserve
Plan Shouf Reserve
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
AL-SHOUF CEDAR
NATURE RESERVE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
2000 - 2005
REPUBLIC OF LEBANON
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
2000-2005
Signed: ………………………………………………….
Minister of Environment
3
Republic of Lebanon
4
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword…………………………………………………………………………..5
GLOSSARY OF TERMS 61
APPENDICES 64
Appendix 1 Law No 532
Appendix 2 Natural Heritage Charter
Appendix 3 Burra Charter
Appendix 4 Activities Table
Appendix 5 Plant Species List
Appendix 6 Mammal Species List
Appendix 7 Reptiles and Amphibians
Appendix 8 Bird Species List
Appendix 9 Contact List
6
FOREWORD
The formal establishment of protected areas to conserve important sites of natural
heritage is recent and heralds a new age in Lebanon - the rediscovery of the natural
landscape of this ancient land.
For thousands of years of its history Lebanon has been influenced and dominated by
foreign powers as it passed from one empire to another. Lebanon’s rich and varied
culture is therefore the product of all these influences, from the Sumerian, Babylonian,
Ancient Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman empires to the more recent
French mandate.
What is remarkable is that despite the continuous use, and often abuse, of all its
natural resources, a few remaining areas still recall the natural splendor that was once
Lebanon.
However, with the rapid modernization of Lebanon these remaining natural areas are
being destroyed through haphazard development. So it is now, with a sense of
urgency, that we need to save the best examples of what is left of the original
landscapes - the mountains, the forests, the wildlife, the beaches, the snow fed rivers,
the caves, the valleys and the gorges.
The establishment of the first three natural protected areas namely Palm Islands
Nature Reserve and Horsh Ehden Nature Reserve (both established in 1992) and Al-
Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve (established in 1996) is just the beginning of what is
hoped will be a rediscovery and respect for the natural heritage of Lebanon. These
areas are distinctly Lebanon. They do not need any foreign imports of plants or
animals to “improve” them. All they need is for the Lebanese to adopt them, to help
protect them, and to pass them on to their children as something to be proud of.
This Draft Management Plan was developed by the Protected Areas Project, including
through the gradual process of management training workshops in 1997, 1998 and
2000. In these workshops the planning process was elaborated and information
regarding the protected areas was collected. After careful editing to make the
document more readable, it was printed and distributed to stakeholders in the Shouf
area for their comments and suggestions on the future management of their protected
area.
Finally, in 2000, the Draft Plan for Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve was reviewed and
revised and submitted for adoption by Government as the master plan for the
management of the Nature Reserve.
……………………
Director General
Ministry of Environment
7
The Protected Areas Project is financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF)
through the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) with the technical and
administrative guidance of the World Conservation Union (IUCN) and under the
execution of the Ministry of Environment in Lebanon.
The day-to-day management of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve has been
contracted by the Protected Areas Project to the Al-Shouf Cedar Society, a locally
based non-governmental organization, thereby involving local citizens in management
of the reserve on behalf of the people of Lebanon.
The role of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve in the Protected Areas Project will be
achieved through recognized practices in planning and policy development for
management of the reserve, the establishment of a trained professional staff to manage
the reserve, the provision of appropriate facilities to protect the heritage values of the
area and to facilitating appropriate public use and enjoyment of the reserve.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This plan is to guide the management of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve. It has
formal application only to publicly owned lands within the designated boundaries of
the protected area. The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve comprises Government owned
lands and communal lands owned by the local Municipal Councils.
This plan is designed to provide all interested persons with a clear documentation of
the future management of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve. This is based on the
principle that the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve is a part of the heritage of the people
of Lebanon and that they have a right to know how their heritage is to be managed.
The main users of the plan will be the Al-Shouf Cedar Society and its Management
Team who are entrusted to manage the reserve on behalf of the people of Lebanon.
The other main users of the plan will be the Ministry of Environment and the
Government Appointed Committee which the Governor is entitled to appoint, as
provided for in Article 11 of Law 532 of 24 July, 1996.
This is the first plan for the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve and is designed to apply
for five years by which time its performance will need to be reviewed. If
circumstances require, the plan can be reviewed at anytime within the five years. That
review will involve further public consultation to take into consideration the views of
the Ministries of Environment and Agriculture, of local groups such as Municipalities
and NGOs, as well as involved and informed individuals.
The plan has been prepared following a series of Training Workshops which were held
in 1997 and 1998 which covered a general survey of the natural and cultural values of
the protected area, the development of a vision for the future of the area, setting of
management objectives, the formulation of a set of rules or policies and the
programming of management initiatives aimed at achieving the adopted objectives.
The planning process has also involved preliminary consultation with a range of key
stakeholders to ensure that the plan is based on accurate information and where
possible accommodates the ideas contributed by others.
The Management Plan for Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve represents the “master
plan” for management of the reserve and operation of the management team. A range
of other management control and guidance plans have been or will be developed to
9
facilitate the conservation and management of the reserves. The intention is that all
such plans will be subsidiary to and consistent with the Management Plan. This
relationship is presented diagrammatically in the following table.
10
Diagram 1
THE PLANNING PROCESS
(Simplified)
VISION
(What we would like to see)
OBJECTIVE
(What we will aim to achieve)
POLICIES
(The rules we will apply)
ACTIONS
(The things we need to do to achieve our objectives)
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
(What do people think about our plan?)
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
(The approaches we will use to implement the plan)
ANNUAL WORKPLANS
(The things we will do to implement the plan)
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGEMENT PLAN AND OTHER PLANS
Protected Area
Management Plan
The north-south orientation of the range maximizes the potential for precipitation from
the moist air streams from the Mediterranean. A classic orographic precipitation
pattern results with most of the rain falling on the Mediterranean approach side of the
range becoming snow at higher altitudes in winter, and with a rain shadow on the
eastern (Bekaa) side of the range. Snow may persist at altitudes above 2,000 meters
for up to 6 months of the year. Several small patches of permanent snow remains
through summer in the vicinity of Qornet el Sawda.
The steep western slopes of the southern extension of the Mount Lebanon range, that
includes the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve, ensures that much of the precipitation is
gathered by fast flowing surface streams running directly to the Mediterranean.
However, the Mount Lebanon range comprises porous and cavernous limestone so
that a large proportion of the net precipitation percolates into the substratum to
eventually discharge as springs on the lower slopes. These spring discharges are
especially important on the eastern Bekaa Valley side of the mountains where there
are few permanent surface streams.
The precipitation on the western slopes of the Mount Lebanon range is adequate to
support a range of forest vegetation, including tall coniferous forest, whereas the lower
rainfall on the eastern slope (Bekaa) supports only low forest or woodland and scrub
of mainly broadleaf species. Precipitation as rainfall and snow on the western fall is
enhanced by atmospheric moisture and mist backing up against the range as a result of
on-shore air movement. The surface discharge of some perennial subterranean streams
is likely to have a local modifying effect on vegetation patterns and species
composition. Another major factor that influences the vegetation is the altitude of Al-
Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve, the altitude of the reserve ranging from 1150 meters to
over2000 meters.
The mostly treeless summit of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve forms the skyline
of a large part of southern Lebanon and gains additional attention in winter with a
mantle of snow. The undeveloped landscape of the Al-Shouf Cedar Reserve contrasts
with the highly developed landscapes of the Bekaa Valley to the east and the Shouf to
the west.
Government legislation, Law No. 532 of 24 July 1996 (See Appendix 1) declared
“The communal lands of Niha, Jbeih, Mreste, Khraibe, Maasser, Barouk, Bmohreh,
Ain Dara, Ain Zahalta villages, in addition to the Government owned lands on the
eastern side of Barouk Mountain, a Nature Reserve.”
According to Al-Shouf Cedar Reserve Law 532, dated 24 July 1996, the legal
authority for managing the reserve is the Government Appointed Committee
comprised of volunteers and representatives of the municipalities who are appointed
for three years by the Governor of Mount Lebanon in consultation with the Minister of
Environment.
The Protected Areas Project document signed by the Council for Development and
Reconstruction (CDR) on behalf of the Government of Lebanon, dated 8th February
1996, gives the management responsibility of the reserve to the Al-Shouf Cedar
Society under the supervision of the Ministry of Environment.
The Kefraya-Maaser Shouf road, which passes through the reserve, is under the
authority of the Ministry of Public Works.
The presence of ancient ruins will require the assistance of the Department of
Antiquities.
The T.V. transmitters in the reserve are the subject of contracts with the Maaser
Municipality and are under the authority of the Ministry of Information.
The water rights, especially the Barouk water, are under the authority of Barouk Water
Office.
15
3.4.1.1. Geology
The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve is located along a mountain range known as the
Barouk Mountain, which is a southern extension of the Mount Lebanon Range. The
range runs parallel to the Mediterranean coast. The Beirut-Damascus highway and the
town of Jezzine define the north and south borders of the reserve.
The western slopes of the range face the Shouf region, the eastern slopes face Mount
Hermon and form the western escarpment of the Bekaa Valley.
The Bekaa Valley is considered to be the northern extension of the Great Rift Valley
in Africa.
The Barouk Mountain comprises rocks from the third geological era (Pliocene) which
has undergone major tectonic movement that divided Mount Lebanon into 2 parallel
parts; the eastern range is called the Anti-Lebanon, and the western range is called
Mount Lebanon. The two mountain ranges are separated by the Bekaa Valley, which
is composed of recent infill sediments. The main rocks are limestone.
3.4.1.2. Geomorphology
Further south from Dahr El Baidar is the highest peak on the range at 2000 meters.
The trend from north to south is for the eastern slopes to change from very steep to
less steep and for the western slopes to become increasingly steep. The top of the
Barouk range becomes increasingly narrow towards the south.
3.4.1.3. Soils
Physical characteristics of the soils are:
• Homogenous, belonging to the red brown Mediterranean soils formed on hard marl
limestone.
• derived from Jurassic, Balthonian, Callovian to Oxfordien – Portlandian marl
limestone
• Stone contents ranges from 80 – 90 %
From an erosion point of view these soils are in a state of equilibrium due to:
• High permeability
• Mask of calcareous fragments
• Good vegetative cover
• Good drainage
3.4.1.4. Hydrology
Precipitation in the watershed is the source of both surface streamflow and
groundwater. The major portion of this occurs as rain. Snowfall often occurs at the
upper elevations but snow seldom persists more than a few days and disappears before
the end of the rainy season.
16
Normally snow has little overall direct effect on stream-flow within the watershed.
However, on rare occasions warm rains falling on the snow-pack may result in rapid
melting and release of large quantities of water at a time when the soils are already
fully saturated. These conditions result in rapid runoff and floods.
A large proportion of the exposed surface rock in the Barouk region is cavernous,
fissured and broken limestone, and its porous condition makes it very permeable. This
results in much of the precipitation infiltrating with minimum surface runoff despite
the often-shallow soils and sparse vegetative cover. Water percolates downward
through the various formations and feeds the many large springs found on lower
slopes in the area. Such springs help maintain stream-flow during the April to
November dry season.
Surface water flows originating on the range are mostly seasonal but some are
perennial.
The summit of the range is considered as a divide between two hydrological systems
because of the difference between the two slopes of the mountain. The eastern slope is
much steeper and favors surface stream flows, whereas the western slope is less steep
and favors ground water aquifers.
The rivers that flow in the valleys are the major source of agriculture irrigation and
supply a dozen Shouf villages with domestic water and some of the western Bekaa
villages. It is also the main source of water for the Ammiq Swamp in the Bekaa.
3.4.1.5. Karst
The whole of the Barouk Mountain is cavernous limestone, with many surface features
such as dolines indicating the underlying cavernous form of the mountain range. One
particularly noteworthy cave, estimated to be 700 meters long, is located near Niha
village. Villagers report an abundance of stalactites and stalagmites and that there is an
underground body of water.
At the local/precinct level several of the cedar stands, in particular the Maaser Al-
Shouf, are recognized as outstanding scenic landscapes, the larger cedars contributing
in a most distinctive way to the landscape. Individual trees can and do attract a lot of
17
positive response from visitors to the area. The aesthetic experience of seeing some of
the larger cedars is undoubtedly enhanced for the visitor by awareness of the important
part they played in the history of Lebanon.
Some of the rugged rocky karst topography of the upper montane areas has a
distinctive scenic beauty of its own. In summer, small grassy meadows persist in
doline depressions, and contrast with the surrounding starkness of the white and gray
limestone.
The western slope of the mountain, with the different patches of cedar forests gives
way to the surrounding villages with red tile roofs. On some days the Mediterranean
Sea may be seen from the summit of the mountain range.
18
3.4.2.1 PLANTS
Appendix 5, Plant Species List, summarizes the results of the survey and inventory
work conducted by the National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) on behalf of
the Protected Areas Project. Additional species may occur and future survey and
inventory is likely to increase the number of officially recorded species. A summary of
the inventory is provided in the table below.
Plants
Categories Number of
(After NCSR, Lebanon) species
A2 Endemic species 50
B3 Rare species 12
C7 Highland species 82
Of a total of 471 species recorded by the NCSR survey, 25 species are nationally or
globally threatened and 12 species are classed as rare. A significant proportion (13%)
of species are Lebanon endemics and more than half (211) of the species are restricted
to the Eastern Mediterranean region. Some 20% of species are ‘highland’ species,
indicating the significance of the mountain tops for plant species conservation.
Forests in Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve represents only 5% of the total area of the
reserve and comprise mainly cedar and oak forests. With minor exceptions, the cedar
forests are located on the upper western slopes, oak occurring at lower elevations on
both aspects.
The main cedar forests cover a total area of 556 hectares, comprising:
19
The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve is the southern limit of Cedrus libani (Cedar of
Lebanon).
20
3.4.2.2. MAMMALS
Appendix 6, Mammals Species List, summarizes the results of the survey and
inventory work conducted by the National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) on
behalf of the Protected Areas Project. Additional species may occur and future survey
and inventory is likely to increase the number of officially recorded species.
Mammals
Categories Numbers
(After NCSR, Lebanon) of Species
A1 Globally threatened species. 12
B6 Species hunted. 21
3.4.2.3 BIRDS
Appendix 7 Bird Species List, summarizes the results of the survey and inventory
work conducted by the National Council for Scientific Research (NCSR) on behalf of
the Protected Areas Project. Additional species may occur but were not encountered
on this survey. Further survey and inventory is likely to increase the number of
officially recorded species.
Birds
Categories Number
(After NCSR, Lebanon) of species
B6 Localized non-breeder 3
B7 Declining breeder 1
Of the 160 species of birds recorded by the NCSR, 4 are globally threatened species
and 10 are regionally or nationally threatened. 42 species are monospecific species. A
large number of species (59) are nationally threatened or declining species. Not
22
withstanding a national hunting ban, almost all bird species are regularly the subject of
substantial hunting pressure.
A bird feature of special note is that the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve is on a major
migratory bird corridor between Africa and Europe/Asia. The reserve is not only
important for these birds in transit but is an excellent mountain site for observing the
migration.
Categories Number of
(After NCSR, Lebanon) Species
A1 Globally threatened species 1
B3 Endemic species 2
Of the total 24 species of Reptile and Amphibian Species recorded by the NCSR, 2 are
globally threatened species (a chameleon and a snake) and a total of 17 are regional
and local species which are threatened in Lebanon. Two are local endemic species.
The cedar forests of Lebanon enjoy the unique distinction as the oldest documented
forests in history. The cedars were important enough in the history of man to be
traceable to the very earliest written records, that of the Sumerians in the third
millennium BC. In the ancient Sumerian story, “The Epic of Gilgamesh”, one of the
oldest pieces of literature in the world, the Cedars feature prominently. Gilgamesh has
since been recognized as King Gilgamesh of history and in probability visited Mount
Lebanon.
It was the Phoenicians along the coast of present-day Lebanon and from such ancient
cities as Byblos, Tyre and Sidon who became the principal dealers in the timber of the
cedar. Indeed, the cedars made a special contribution to the development of the
Phoenician civilization by providing the timbers with which they developed their
famous sea-going merchant boats thus becoming one of the first, if not the first major
sea-going trading nation in the world.
The Phoenicians traded the cedar to Egypt, until Egypt in turn conquered the land of
the cedars and gained direct access to the forests, which were highly prized in the
building of temples and boats. Later the Babylonians took a similar interest in the
cedars and obtained them for use in building the fabled city of Babylon.
People around the world know of the cedars of Lebanon because of the numerous
references in the Hebrew texts of the Old Testament. The Bible records in some detail
how King Solomon, King of Israel, requested of King Hiram of Tyre to supply cedar
and to build a temple and a palace in Jerusalem.
In the 6th Century BC, Persian control of the Phoenician ports provided the Persians
with the means of assembling a navy for use against their enemies the Greeks who
were already embarrassing the Persians with their mobility in the Mediterranean as
they leased and copied the Phoenician triremes.
The expansion of the Roman Empire into Syria and Lebanon had its detrimental effect
on the cedars until the Emperor Hadrian installed the markers around the boundary of
the remaining forests and declared them as Imperial Domain. Specimens of these
markers have been preserved and held in museum collections.
The Ottoman Turks deforested all of the cedar growing areas within easy transport
distance of their Hijaz railway to provide fuel for their wood-burning engines. Only
the highest and most remote groves escaped damage.
In the modern day Lebanon the legendary cedar is still revered and remains prominent
in the minds of all Lebanese. The cedar features on the national flag, the national
airline, Government logos, the Lebanese currency and innumerable commercial logos.
24
It is the feature of books, poetry, post cards, posters and art. The Cedars of Lebanon
are truly an important part of the cultural heritage of the people of Lebanon.
Qalaat Niha
The cave castle of Tyron Niha relates to one of the closing episodes of Prince
Fakhreddin II’s epic history and are the only remaining vestiges of a once
powerful fortress which was successively used by the Arabs, Crusaders, and a
number of princes of Mount Lebanon.
El Nabi Ayoub
A feretory was built on the hill above the village of Niha to honor Job’s
memory and hold his relics. Ayoub is the Arabic name of the prophet Job.
In the heights of the mountain, traces of old shelters for cattle and goats can be seen,
and can be of interest for visitors.
Summary
The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve, comprising 55,000 hectares represents the
largest protected area in Lebanon. Approximately 5% of the protected area is forest,
including 550 hectares of Cedrus libani, or about 25% of the total remaining cedar
forests in the country.
The whole of the protected area has been subject to a long history of grazing by
domestic stock and timber extraction. Despite the history of exploitation, the forest
communities are in relatively good condition and impacts of past use are not always
evident. Since grazing was halted in 1997, a spectacular regeneration of trees, flowers
and shrubs has occurred.
25
The Shouf has seen many cultures, religions, and historical events, all of which have
left an imprint on the landscape. The educational potential of the reserve is very
significant both for teaching natural history and human impacts on the landscape.
26
Each of the main heritage values identified in the inventory was subjected to
evaluation to establish their relative conservation significance. The evaluation process
highlighted the scarcity of information at the national level for a number of natural
resources, particularly for the animal species. Not withstanding the patchiness of the
data available, a number of features of the reserve are clearly of great conservation
value, both at the national and in some cases at the regional (Middle East) level. Of
particular importance for the purpose of conservation management is:
At the landscape level, the reserve offers protection from urbanisation and
development of a mountain ridge which is a prominent part of the scenic landscape of
southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley. With the spread of housing and urban
development and associated quarrying throughout much of Lebanon, the value of the
reserve as a protected landscape will continue to grow. The scenic landscape values of
the reserve are a legitimate cultural heritage value deserving protection and which is
totally compatible with protection of the natural ecological values of the reserve.
Given the relative accessibility of Al-Shouf, the area has been subject to a long history
of landuse activity, though little has been subject to cultivation. Traditional uses have
been primarily wood harvesting and sheep and goat herding. Goat herding was
allowed up to 1997 when the reserve was closed to this use.
As a product of past landuse and patterns that misused the environment, including
recent warfare, the landscape of Al-Shouf Cedar Reserve is extensively degraded. The
cedar forest remnants are largely confined to the steeper and less accessible areas,
particularly towards the higher altitude of the cedar range where trees tend to be wider
spaced and less attractive for timber harvesting. Many of the oak forests have been
subject to regular harvesting for firewood and charcoal production, resulting in
extensive areas of coppiced oak woodland and low forest.
In the 1960’s, some extensive reforestation was undertaken on some of the upper
western slopes. Reforestation was mainly with seedling cedars planted on artificial
terraces. The genetic origins of those plantings have been questioned and are subject
to ongoing research.
As the largest protected area in Lebanon, the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve has
special significance for the maintenance of natural processes and wildlife habitat. In
the context of the present protected area system, it represents the best prospect for the
long term conservation of the larger mammal species such as the wolf and striped
hyena. It also has the potential for re-introduction of some locally extinct species of
mammal such as the mountain gazelle.
The relatively large size of the reserve is not only an asset for wildlife conservation
but also offers the opportunity for providing for eco-tourism visitor use with a low
environmental impact. However, visitor use must at all times be carefully planned and
managed to have an acceptable low level of impact.
The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve provides one of the more accessible opportunities
to visit and experience cedar forests in a natural landscape setting and is already
proving to be the most popular venue for such experiences.
28
Past use and inadequate management has resulted in degradation of the natural and
cultural values of Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve. Therefore the vision and the
objectives developed for this management plan require an improvement in the
environmental condition of these natural and cultural values.
Further, it will be necessary to ensure that any change which is externally imposed is
managed to achieve a positive outcome. Management of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature
Reserve is therefore essentially about initiating and managing change so that the
changes achieve the management objectives set out in this plan.
It is also recognized that various changes may occur during the life of the five years of
the plan. Some of these will occur naturally, some initiated as a part of management
and some imposed from outside the area and the plan. Unless the net result of these
changes is towards achieving the management objectives we will not achieve our
conservation objectives.
To maximize the chances of achieving those objectives, five guiding principles have
been adopted.
2. Burra Charter
The Burra Charter is a set of principles and standards which have been developed to
guide the management of cultural heritage sites to maintain the cultural heritage
values. The Burra Charter has the endorsement of ICOMOS-the International
Committee on Monuments. (See Appendix 3)
4. “Net Benefit”
The guiding principle of net benefit is that all management or other activities,
actions or decisions should, as far as practicable result in a ‘net benefit’ or net
improvement in the environmental values, integrity or condition of the protected
area. (See Glossary)
29
5. Precautionary Principle
An internationally used environmental principle, which requires that lack of
scientific certainty should not be used as an excuse for not taking action to address
a known environmental problem. (See definition in Appendix 2)
30
The vision for the year 2020 for the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve is that it will be
widely regarded in the Middle East and Mediterranean regions as the premier
protected area because of its success in sustainable conservation. Such a reputation
can only be achieved by:
1. Conservation of Biodiversity
• No loss of species in 20 years of management
• Populations of all rare and threatened species are increased or sustained. Some
locally extinct species successfully reintroduced.
• Natural ecological processes are operating with minimal need for management
intervention.
• The landscape of the reserve is perceived as natural and is largely devoid of
evidence of human presence.
2. Management Excellence
• The managers of the reserve are known for their professional skills and
effectiveness in achieving conservation and management outcomes in a cost-
effective way.
3. Community Support
• The reserve has achieved a high level of community support. The immediate
surrounding communities are proud of their reserve and the prestige and income
that it has brought to their communities.
4. Financial Sustainability
• The managers of the reserve have developed a very successful model of financial
sustainability without compromising the heritage values of the reserve.
5. Visitors
• The reserve receives a high level of visitors but the quality of visitor experience
and satisfaction remains high and this is achieved with a minimal impact on the
values and integrity of the reserve.
• Independent evaluation has established that the visitor use of the reserve has been
achieved with a net benefit to the reserve and is seen as a model for other protected
areas.
The following is a list of the main constraints on realization of the vision for the Al-
Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve.
1. Funding
• Funds to pay the salaries for the Management Team.
• Funds to purchase equipment, vehicle facilities and their maintenance.
• Funds for on-going surveillance and monitoring of flora and fauna.
• Funds to reintroduce locally extinct species.
2. Research
• Incompleteness of resource inventories.
• No prior experience in captive breeding and release of mammals.
• Delay in the demarcation of reserve boundaries.
3. Community
• Uncertainty regarding private land ownership within and around the reserve.
• Increase of development pressures.
• Rise of community opposition.
• Increase of flora harvest for food and medicine.
• Return of illegal goat grazing.
• Return of wildlife poaching.
• Incompatible agricultural practices around the reserve boundaries.
4. Political
• Potential political instability in Lebanon and the region.
• Threat from existing and planned rock quarries
• Lack of enforcement of ban on hunting.
• Potential for lack of clarity of roles of Management Team, NGO and any future
Government appointed committee.
5. Natural
• Fires and their threat to the ecology of the area.
• Water scarcity within reserve resulting in wildlife movement to outside the reserve
and exposing wildlife to hunters.
6. Personnel
• Maaser Shouf-Kefraya road is inside the reserve and requires rangers to patrol it.
• T.V. station and building constructed inside the reserve.
• Skills, education, language, experience of reserve team.
• Tourism pressure is on the increase.
32
5.1 OBJECTIVES
The following objectives represent the principle aims for the management of Al-Shouf
Cedar Nature Reserve during the five-year life of the Management Plan, and are a
based on the preceding “Vision for the Future”.
Policies and related Actions are presented below. The actual effect of these policies
on a range of Activities are illustrated in the Activities Table at Appendix 4.
POLICIES
POLICY 1.8 Import of soil: No soil or other material which may contain
organic matter, especially seeds, will be introduced to the
protected area.
ACTIONS
POLICIES
POLICY 2.4 Objects and artifacts: All objects and artifacts dating from
before 1920 encountered in authorized and unauthorized
excavations will be assumed to be the property of the
Government of Lebanon, through the Director of Antiquities,
unless and until proven otherwise.
ACTIONS
POLICIES
POLICY 3.5 Right to Know: The principle of “the community has the
right to know” will be adopted.
POLICY 3.8 Local priority: Where appropriate and cost effective, priority
will be given to purchasing of goods and services and
employment recruitment from the local community.
39
ACTIONS
POLICIES
ACTIONS
POLICIES
ACTIONS
TO DEVELOP LONG TERM SOURCES OF FUNDING THAT WILL ALLOW OF THE AL-
SHOUF CEDAR RESERVE TO SUPPORT ITS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
POLICIES
POLICY 6.3 Strategy: The generation of funding and other resources will
be guided by a properly considered and documented Funding
Strategy.
POLICY 6.7 Code of Conduct: All fundraising and other resourcing will
be undertaken in a totally lawful and ethical way, guided by a
‘Code of Conduct’, with all funds being publicly accountable.
ACTIONS
ACTION 6.2 Resources and Income Plan: Develop a Funding Plan for the
Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve which includes income
generation, sponsorship and donations of money, goods and
services.
POLICIES
POLICY 7.6 Health and Safety: Occupational health and safety issues
relating to staff will be given high priority.
ACTIONS
ACTION 7.1 Training: Draft and implement a Training Program for the
AL-Shouf Cedar Society and management team personnel
46
POLICIES
POLICY 8.12 Minister has Final Word: If for any reason a development is
proposed which is inconsistent with the management plan, that
development cannot be approved prior to the Minister of
Environment making a decision about whether she/he is
prepared to amend the management plan to allow the proposed
development.
ACTIONS
POLICIES
POLICY 9.2 Research Permit: All research projects within the reserve
will require a research permit that is issued by the reserve
manager. The application for such a permit should describe
the objectives, research methodology, field operations, and
on-site environmental impact.
ACTIONS
A list of all actions identified, by objective and priority rated. (very high, high,
medium, low)
eenline to Medium
nduct regular monitoring of Al-
houf Cedar Nature Reserve.
One of the important means by which the Management Plan will be implemented is by
preparation of an Annual Workplan for implementation by the Management Team. It
is essential that these Workplans are based on the Management Plan.
The budget process will closely conform to the Management Plan, in particular with
the Actions section of Part III. It is recognized that the budget and other constraints
may necessitate temporary departure from the order in the list of actions. However,
every endeavor will be made to maintain the order of activities set out in the plan.
57
In the relatively short time since the end of the Lebanese civil war there has been a
major pulse of development, especially in the rebuilding and modernisation of Beirut.
Many Lebanese nationals have returned from overseas to contribute to the re-building
of Lebanese society. Lebanese citizens are now enjoying a new degree of affluence
and a degree of freedom to travel around the country unknown during the civil war.
One consequence is that the Lebanese rural landscape is now much more accessible
from the cities, both for exploitation and aesthetic and recreational appreciation.
The economic expansionism of Lebanon has brought with it many threats to the
natural landscape, especially the threat from urban development and major quarries.
The Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve has already been impacted by several such
quarries. Indeed, there are large quarries in the northern section of the Al-Shouf Cedar
Nature Reserve, all established prior to the establishment of the reserve but continuing
to operate. Additional quarries will continue to represent an on-going threat to the
Lebanese rural landscape and in particular the Al-Shouf.
One of the aftermath’s of the Lebanese civil war was unexploded mines in parts of the
country, including parts of the Al-Shouf. The limited placement of mines north of the
Maaser Shouf - Kefraya road had been removed by 2000. However, reportedly
extensive mine placements in the Niha Mountain (south of the Maaser Shouf-Kefraya)
remain, a factor that will limit public access to the Niha Mountain section for the
foreseeable future.
The mostly treeless summit of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve forms the skyline
of a large part of southern Lebanon and gains additional attention in winter with its
mantle of snow. The undeveloped landscape of the Al-Shouf Cedar Reserve contrasts
with the highly developed landscapes of the Bekaa Valley to the east and the Shouf to
the west. The mountains also contain small remnants of forest, especially cedar
forests. Public roads provide ready access to several parts of the Al-Shouf.
As such, the mountains provide an attraction for people seeking out the undeveloped
landscape. The most accessible of the cedar forests is the small but attractive Maaser
Shouf forest on the Maaser Shouf - Kefraya road which was opened to limited public
access in the late nineteen nineties. Since then, visitation has grown rapidly to in
excess of 50,000 in the 1999 season.
The rate of increase in the level of visitation is just one indicator of the visitor demand
for recreational and tourism access to public lands in Lebanon, in particular to cedar
forests. There is every reason to believe that the Al - Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve will
continue to have appeal to visitors, including as tourists, both national and
international.
The challenges for the management of the Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve will be not
how to attract visitors but how to manage the anticipated increased visitation in such a
way that the ecology of the reserve is not impaired and similarly, that the quality of
the visitor experience is not impaired but is enhanced. Only in this way can tourism
to the reserve be managed to the long term benefit of the reserve. Sound planning and
sound management will be the means by which tourism will be demonstrated to
benefit the reserve.
Great care will need to be taken to avoid conflicts between tourism, especially
international tourism, and other legitimate local and national uses such as
environmental education and specialised nature based activities such as bird-watching.
These issues will be addressed in the preparation and periodic review of a Visitor
Management Plan.
Great care will need to be exercised in avoiding creation of a tourism market which is
not easily regulated and which could create conflict with the primary conservation
objectives of the reserve. In particular, it is critically important to avoid acquiescence
to establishment of any overnight accommodation for tourism or tourism related
purposes.
The Al-Shouf Cedar Reserve Management Plan 2000-2005 requires the preparation
and annual review of a 10 year Business Plan (See Section 2.3 of this plan for
relationship between the two plans)
The Business Plan makes a number of assumptions and predictions which may prove
to be unachievable, at least in the shorter term. However, the Business Plan 2000-2010
should form the basis for a revised plan to be brought into operation as a matter of
priority.
The need to regulate the level of visitation to the reserve, together with the seasonality
of the access, means that the opportunity for revenue raising will be limited and will
fluctuate from month to month. Placing too much emphasis on fund raising from
visitor access fees is problematic and may lead to unfulfilled revenue estimates.
Similarly, much of the management work that needs to be undertaken in the reserve is
bio-diversity conservation and not related to the provision of most visitor experiences.
It is therefore arguable that visitors should not be expected to pay for conservation
management aspects of the reserve.
The Funding Plan for the nature reserve needs to be regularly and carefully reviewed
to ensure that the return on investment of staff time and any re-investment of funds is
maximised and conversely that staff time commitment to fund raising is balanced
against the management demands of the reserve.
To facilitate fine tuning of both the Business Plan and the Funding Plan, it will be
important for management to accurately monitor performance of both plans from the
very beginning of the plans being operational.
The Annual Review of the Business Plan should be conducted in conjunction with the
annual review/preparation of the:
• Annual Workplan
• Budget and
• Funding Plan
60
A Funding Plan has been prepared for Al-Shouf Cedar Nature Reserve. This plan
requires the regular review and implementation of the Funding Plan.
The Funding Plan 2000 is to provide the basis for fund raising towards the financial
sustainability of the reserve. However, it must be emphasised that all fund raising
undertaken must be consistent with the Management Plan, in particular with the
protection and maintenance of the important natural heritage values of the reserve.
Fund raising should not be limited to external funding but will of necessity include
making a case for regular funding from Government to at least cover those
conservation activities directed at protection and management of National Heritage
values. Funding commitments and forecasts should be developed at least three years in
advance to avoid short-term fund raising with the attendant uncertainty for
management personnel.
The preparation of this draft management plan is a requirement of the Protected Areas
Project of Lebanon. Following the receipt of comments on this Draft Management
Plan, the revised plan will be submitted for Minister of Environment approval in 1999.
In keeping with international practice, the plan will be subject to extensive review
within 5 years of ministerial approval. That review will involve community
consultation. Prior to review of the plan, the managing authority will have prepared an
independent report on performance measured against the objectives.
The Al-Shouf Cedar Society (or other committee or agency lawfully responsible for
the area) will be responsible for regular review of the implementation of the
management plan approved by the Minister. They also need to report to the Minister
the results of their assessment of progress and make any recommendations they see
necessary to improve progress in implementation.
If the Governor of Mount Lebanon during the term of this plan, appoints a
Government Committee for the reserve (or other committee or agency lawfully
appointed), will be expected to, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment to:
• Periodically meet with the Al Shouf Cedar Society and their Management Team
(or other committee or agency lawfully responsible for the area) to establish
progress and problems encountered by the Society in implementation of the plan.
• Periodically, in the company of the Al Shouf Cedar Society, (or other committee
or agency lawfully responsible for the area) inspect the reserve to observe the
condition of the reserve and compliance with the management plan
• Prepare annual reports to the Minister, incorporating the report presented during
the relevant year from the Al Shouf Cedar Society (or other committee or agency
lawfully responsible for the area) and any other information relevant to the
implementation of the plan.
• Make recommendations to the Minister on any changes necessary to improve the
compliance with and implementation of the plan.
62
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Biodiversity The natural biological diversity, including, but not limited to
the diversity of species, plant communities and natural
associations of plants and animals. But see the Natural
Heritage Charter.
Cultural Heritage Heritage may be defined as the places and things that a
people or community regard as part of their inheritance and
which they consider worthy of protection. Cultural heritage is
mainly those places or objects which are man-made as
distinct from natural.
Natural Heritage Heritage may be defined as the places and things that a
people or community regard as part of their inheritance and
which they consider worthy of protection. Natural heritage is
that part of heritage which is derived from nature as distinct
from man-made features or human contrived things.
64
Single Article - The proposed law that aims to establish a natural protected area (Al-
Shouf Cedar) has been legalized as it has been amended by the Committee of
Administration and Justice.
First Article:
The public properties of the villages of Niha, Jbaa, Mresti, Khreibeh, Maaser, Barouk,
Bmohray, Ain Darah and Ain Zhalta are considered as Natural Protected Area in
addition to the properties of the east side of Barouk Mountain, the mentioned public
properties are located within the borders shown below:
Second Article:
Aiming to preserve the wood, plant and animal wealth in the natural protected area;
hence cutting , investing or industrializing trees of seedlings within the protected area
is prohibited by law whatever their kinds.
1. Setting fire or burning the grass and others such as plants and natural wastes which
exist in the protected area or (within) less than 500 meters of its border.
2. Wild hunting in the protected area or within a distance less than 500 meters of its
border.
3. Camping in the protected lands or throwing the wastes etc…….
4. Every act that may damage the protected area or deforms its natural sights or
destroys its resources.
Each person who sets fire in the protected area is punished by entering the prison for a
juration ranging from one month to two years. Punishment must meet with the
damages estimated by the court. In the case of there being two punishments for the
same offense with different texts, the extreme punishment is applied.
Appointing the members of the protected land must take into consideration the
representation of the area municipalities and those who have in-depth experience in
ecology.
333.720994
Contents
Preamble 3
Purpose 3
Ethos of the Charter 4
How to use the Charter 5
Parns
PART A Definitions
Alphabetical reference to the definitions 6
Values 7
Degradation and disturbance 9
Conservation processes 9
Actions 10
Part B Conservation Principles
Basis of conservation 11
Conservation policy 12
Removal of elements 12
Part C Conservation Processes
Regeneration 13
Restoration 13
Enhancement 13
Reinstatement 14
Preservation 14
Modification 14
Maintenance 14
Part D Conservation Practice
Obtaining information about a place 15
Conservation policy 16
Conservation plan 16
Consultation 16
Records 16
Monitoring 16
Background
Development of the Charter 17
Purpose of the Charter 18
Administration and Future Review 18
Address for copies and comments 18
3
Preamble
IUCN (the International Union The Australian Natural Heritage Charter was adopted in
for the Conservation of Nature
and Natural Resources) is now December 1996 following a two-year period of extensive
known as the World national consultation. At that time the Australian Committee for
Conservation Union. IUCN accepted responsibility for the promotion, promulgation,
The Charter is not intended to
provide a detailed process for administration and future review of the Charter. The Charter
describing places for the purpose is for use by all Australian organisations and individuals.
of listing them on heritage
registers.
C O N S E R VAT I O N P R A C T I C E
Each step is a discrete Determine the conservation processes which will be used.
stage How will the conservation objectives be met?
Articles 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Monitoring is a
fundamental element Decide on responsibilities for decisions,
of conservation approvals and actions.
Article 30
practice
Formulate the conservation plan.
How will we make it happen?
Article 30
Definitions
A
ALPHABETICAL REFERENCE TO THE DEFINITIONS
In this Charter, words for which a definition is provided are
printed in italics.
GENERAL
Article 1. For the purpose of the Charter the following
definitions apply.
GENERAL
1.1 Place means a site or area with associated ecosystems ,
which are the sum of its geo-diversity , biological diversity
and natural processes.
7
VA L U E S
VALUES
1.3. This definition is 1.2 Natural significance means the importance of ecosystems,
essentially
the same as that used in biological diversity and geodiversity for their existence value,
‘The National Strategy for or for present or future generations in terms of
the Conservation of Australia’s
Biodiversity’ to which all their scientific, social, aesthetic and life-support value.
Australian Governments
are signatory.
1.3 Biological diversity(also known as biodiversity ) means
the variety of life forms: the different plants, animals and
micro-organisms, the genes they contain, and the
ecosystems they form. It is usually considered at four levels:
genetic diversity , species diversity , ecosystem diversity and
community diversity.
1.10. Special classes of 1.7 Genetic diversity means the variety of genetic
indigenous species, often
defined in legislation by terms information contained in the total genes of individual
such as threatened species, plants, animals and micro-organisms in an area.
vulnerable species, or
endangered species, have not
been defined in this Charter. 1.8 Geodiversity means the range of earth features including
geological, geomorphological, palaeontological, soil,
hydrological and atmospheric features, systems and earth
processes.
1.11 Introduced species means a translocated or alien species 1.11. Introduced species
occurring at a place outside its historically known include those that have
been translocated to a
natural range as a result of intentional or accidental dispersal place from elsewhere in
by human activities. Australia, and those that
are genetically modified.
1.12 Organism means any living being.
1.22 Conservation, may, according 1.22 Conservation means all the processes and
to circumstance, include actions of looking after a place so as to retain its
conservation management measures,
regeneration, restoration,
natural significance and always includes protection ,
enhancement, reinstatement, maintenance and monitoring .
preservation or modification, or a
combination of more than one of
these.
ACTIONS
1.29 Protection means taking care of a place by
maintenance and by managing impacts to ensure that
natural significance is retained.
1.32 Monitoring means ongoing review, evaluation and 1.32. Monitoring is used to
assessment to detect changes in condition of the natural allow review of decisions
assisted by knowledge of the
integrity of a place, with reference to a baseline effects of conservation
condition. processes and actions.
11
Conservation
B Principles
BASIS OF CONSERVATION
CONSERVATION POLICY
REMOVAL OF ELEMENTS
C REGENERATION
Article 12. Article 12. Regeneration does not include physical
(i) See also the note at Article intervention, but includes monitoring and
1.23 concerning assisted
regeneration.
may include conservation management
(ii) ‘Conservation management of measures of a non-physical nature.
a non-physical nature’ may
include actions such as placing a
protective covenant on a title to
land, reserving the place as a
nature reserve or placing
interpretative signs at the place
about its natural significance.
RESTORATION
Articles 13 and 17. In Article 13. Restoration is appropriate only if there is
considering restoration and sufficient evidence of an earlier state to
reinstatement, the length of time
that has passed since the
guide the conservation process and if
existence of the ‘earlier state’ returning the ecosystem to that state
will influence decisions on reveals the natural significance of that
conservation policy and process place.
and will be a matter of judgement
by the practitioner for each place.
ENHANCEMENT
Article 14. Examples of Article 14. Enhancement is appropriate only if there
enhancement include: is evidence that the introduction of
raising the numbers of a
species to that needed for a viable
additional habitat elements or individuals
self-perpetuating community; of a species which exist at that place are
returning an element of necessary for, or contribute to, the
habitat that has been seriously conservation of the
depleted, e.g. adding gravel natural significance of the place.
material to expand the shallows
and riffles of a stream that has
been deepened or mined.
Article 15. Where organisms are introduced to a
Article 15. This means that place for the purpose of enhancement the
genotypes different to the local
genotype of a species at a place
individuals introduced to the place
should not be introduced to it should not alter the natural species
unless it is necessary for diversity or genetic diversity of the place
restoration or preservation of if that would reduce its
the natural significance. natural significance.
Article 16. Enhancement should be limited to a
Article 16. This refers to existing minor part of biological diversity or geo-
natural systems and is not an
argument against the creation of
diversity of a place and should not
new habitat following mining etc. constitute a majority of the ecosystem, or
habitats or earth features of the place.
14
REINSTATEMENT
Article 17 Reinstatement is appropriate only if there is Article 17. Reinstatement is
evidence that the species or habitat elements similar in concept, but not
the same as, reconstruction
or earth features, which are to be introduced, of a cultural place.
have existed there naturally at a previous
time, and if returning them to the place
contributes to restoration of the natural
significance of that place, and if processes
threatening to their existence at that place
have been discontinued.
PRESERVATION
Article 18. Preservation is appropriate where the Article 18. There may be
natural significance of a place is its existing situations where the
conservation strategy for
stage of natural succession or the existing protecting natural
state of its geo-diversity . significance is to maintain
the ecosystem of a place at a
particular point
Article 19. Preservation should be limited to the in its succession, e.g.
minimum intervention, or the change of preservation may be an
appropriate conservation
maintenance actions, needed to suspend the process for the locality of the
natural earth processes or processes of Wollemi pine in New South
succession and where that intervention or Wales, thought to be a
change will not adversely affect surrounding surviving relic of a previous
ecosystems . climatic environment.
MODIFICATION
Article 20. Modification is acceptable where the
conservation of a place cannot otherwise be
achieved and where modification does not
substantially detract from its natural
significance and where the modification will
not adversely affect surrounding ecosystems
Conservation
D Practice
OBTAINING INFORMATION ABOUT A PLACE
Article 24. Article 24 Work or other conservation action or processes at
(i) The minimum a place should be preceded by research, and
information required
before work or other
review of the available physical, oral,
conservation action or documentary and other evidence about the
processes are existing biological diversity ,geo-diversity and
commenced at a place ecosystems including evidence from Indigenous
is identification of its people.
natural significance.
Article 25. If the place Article 25 Evidence of the existing biological diversity ,
appears to have geo-diversity, and any other significant features
features of cultural
heritage significance,
of the place(such as cultural heritage) should be
reference may also be recorded before any intervention in the place.
made to the Australia
ICOMOS Charter for
the Conservation of
Places of Cultural
Heritage Significance
(known as the ‘Burra
Charter’).
Article 26. The study Article 26. Study of a place may require some intervention to
should be designed so provide the data essential for deciding the natural
as to provide
appropriate data.
significance of a place and the conservation
policy and strategy. In these cases the intervention
should be carried out with minimal impact on the
biological diversity and geo-diversity of the place
and the intervention actions should be recorded.
CONSERVATION POLICY
Article 29 A written statement of the conservation Article 29. See also Articles
policy should be prepared setting out the 6-9. The statement of
conservation policy should
natural significance and the proposed be of as high a quality as
conservation procedure together with the possible, and prepared or
justification and supporting evidence. reviewed by a person with
appropriate experience,
knowledge or professional
qualifications.
CONSERVATION PLAN
Article 30 A conservation plan should be prepared, Article 30. The conservation
incorporating the conservation policy, plan may be a component of
a more broadly-based
stating the conservation process(es) that will management plan for a range
be used, naming the organisations and/or of land uses for the place,
individuals responsible for policy decisions, e.g., a farm plan, a plan of
stating the conservation outcomes that the management for a reserve or
conservation plan is intended to achieve, and a land or vegetation
rehabilitation program.
outlining the monitoring program for the
conservation .
N S E R V AT I O N P L A N
Background
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHARTER
This Charter was developed over a two-year period in consultation with key people
and organisations in the nature conservation community around Australia. An initial
round of consultation during 1995 resulted in the Interim Australian Natural Heritage
Charter (January 1996). A second round of national consultation during 1996 further
refined the Interim Charter. The Australian Natural Heritage Charter was adopted in
December 1996.
The Charter was developed with funding from the Australian Heritage Commission. A
national Steering Committee provided perspectives of the Australian Committee for
IUCN (World Conservation Union), the Australian Heritage Commission,
the Australian Local Government Association, the Australian Nature Conservation
Agency, the Environment Institute of Australia and Indigenous people. Steering
Committee members were Pam Eiser, John Heath, Theo Hooy, Mary Lou Morris,
Meg Switzer, John Pritchard and Lisa Florian. The project consultant who developed
the Charter was Lorraine Cairnes of Fathom Consulting, Sydney.
The Charter relates closely in its general structure and logic to that of the Australia
ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (‘Burra
Charter’)—and can be used in conjunction with the Burra Charter for places which
have both natural and cultural values.
18
Postal GPO Box 528, Sydney, New South Wales 2001, Australia
E-mail aciucn@ozemail.com.au
Article 2: The aim of conservation is to retain the cultural significance of a place and
must include provision for its security, its maintenance and its future.
Article 3: Conservation is based on a respect for the existing fabric and should
involve the least possible physical intervention. It should not distort the evidence
provided by the fabric.
Article 4: Conservation should make use of all the disciplines which can contribute to
the study and safeguarding of a place. Techniques employed should be traditional but
in some circumstances they may be modern ones for which a firm scientific basis
exists and which have been supported by a body of experience.
Article 5: Conservation of a place should take into consideration all aspects of its
cultural significance without unwarranted emphasis on any one aspect at the expense
of others.
Article 7: The conservation policy will determine which uses are compatible.
Article 9: A building or work should remain in its historical location. The moving of
all or part of a building or work is unacceptable unless this is the sole means of
ensuring its survival.
Article 10: The removal of contents which form part of the cultural significance of the
place is unacceptable unless it is the sole means of ensuring their security and
preservation. Such contents must be returned should changed circumstances make this
practicable.
2
Article 11: Preservation is appropriate where the existing state of the fabric itself
constitutes evidence of specific cultural significance, or where insufficient evidence is
available to allow other conservation processes to be carried out.
Article 14: Restoration should reveal anew culturally significant aspects of the place.
It is based on respect for all the physical, documentary and other evidence and stops at
the point where conjecture begins.
Article 16: The contributions of all periods to the place must be respected. If a place
includes the fabric of different periods, revealing the fabric of one period at the
expense of another can only be justified when what is removed is of slight cultural
significance and the fabric which is to be revealed is of much greater cultural
significance.
Article 18: Reconstruction is limited to the completion of a deleted entity and should
not constitute the majority of the fabric of the place.
Article 19: Reconstruction is limited to the reproduction of fabric, the form of which
is known from the physical and/or documentary evidence. It should be identifiable on
close inspection as being new work.
Article 20: Adaptation is acceptable when the conservation of the place cannot
otherwise be achieved, and where the adaptation does not substantially detract from its
cultural significance.
Article 21: Adaptation must be limited to that which is essential to a use for the place
determined in accordance with Articles 6 and 7.
Article 26: The organization and individuals responsible for policy decisions must be
named and specific responsibility taken for each such decision.
Article 28: The records required by Articles 23, 25, 26 and 27 should be placed in a
permanent archive and made publicly available.
NORTH ZONE
(North Of Maaser Shouf - Kefraya Road)
Photography - Amateur
Photography - Professional
Bird-watching
Picnicking
Skiing
Camping
Research
Quarrying - new
Roads - new
Buildings
Photography - Amateur
Photography - Professional
Birdwatching
Walking on tracks
Picnicking
Skiing DANGER*
Camping
New Quarrying
Roads - new
Research
* Extensive parts of the Niha Mountain section of Al-Shouf Nature Reserve contain
buried land mines.
8
Appendix 5
LEGEND
A1: THREATENED SPECIES AT NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELS
A2: ENDEMIC SPECIES
B3: RARE SPECIES
B4: SPECIES THAT ARE WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY RESTRICTED TO EAST MEDITERRANEAN
REGION
B5: LOCALISED SPECIES WITHIN THE RESERVE
B6: SPECIES THAT ARE PREFERABLY CUT BY LOCAL PEOPLE
C7: HIGHLAND SPECIES
C8: BIO-INDICATOR SPECIES
C9: ECONOMIC SPECIES (MEDICINAL (M), FODDER (F))
D10: COMMON SPECIES
D11: WIDESPREAD SPECIES IN THE WORLD OR EUROPE OR ASIA AND AROUND THE
MEDITERRANEAN.
INVENTORY
PRIORITIES A A B B B B C C C D D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PINACEAE
Cedrus libani + + +
CUPRESSACEAE
Juniperus oxycedrus + + M + +
Arceuthos drupacea + + + + +
POACEAE (GRAMINEAE)
Themeda trianda syriaca +
Hyparrhenia hirta + F +
Phalaris brachystachys +
Phalaris bulbosa + +
Stipa bromoides + F +
Stipa barbata + F +
Oryzopsis miliacea F + +
Oryzopsis holciformis blancheana + +
Milium pedicellare + +
Milium trichopodum + +
Heleochloa acutiglumis + +
Alopecurus anthoxanthoides + +
Phleum montanum + + + F
Phleum nodosum + +
Gastridium ventricosum + F +
Eragrostis pilosa + + +
Corynphorus deschampsioides + +
Pilgerochloa blanchei + + F
9
Trisetaria flavescens F +
Arrhenatherum elatius + + + + F +
Arrhenatherum palaestinum + F +
Arrhenatherum kotschyi + + + +
Melica inaequiglumis + + F +
Melica ciliata laxiflora + F +
Cynosurus coloratus + F +
Dactylis glomerata hispanica + F +
Poa diversifolia + + F
Poa silvicola + +
Poa persica alpina +
Briza maxima + F +
Bromus tomentellus + + F
Bromus tectorum + +
Bromus japonicus + +
Agropyron panormitanum + F +
Agropyron libanoticum + F +
Heteranthelium piliferum + +
Aegilops ovata +
Taeniatherium crinitum + F
CYPERACEAE
Cyperus flavescens + +
Scirpus holoschoenus +
Blysmus compressus + +
Carex stenophylla +
Carex divisa + +
Carex flacca + +
JUNCACEAE
Juncus capitatus + +
LILIACEAE
Colchicum decaisnei + + +
Colchicum hierosolymitanum +
Colchicum brachyphyllum +
Asphodelus microcarpus + M +
Asphodeline brevicaulis druzorum +
Gagea anisanthos +
Gagea peduncularis +
Gagea micrantha +
Gagea reticulata +
Tulipa aucheriana westii +
Tulipa lownei +
Tulipa montana +
Fritillaria crassifolia + +
Fritillaria libanotica +
Scilla hyacinthoides + +
Scilla cilicica +
Ornithogalum billardieri + +
Ornithogalum neurostegium + F
Puschkinia scilloides libanotica +
Hyacinthus orientalis +
Bellavalia macrobotrys +
Bellavalia hermonis +
Bellavalia flexuosa +
10
Muscari neglectum +
Muscari commutatum F +
Allium rotundum +
Allium affine + +
Allium arvense + +
Allium stamineum +
Allium rupicolum + + +
Allium feinbergii +
Allium libani +
Allium trifoliatum +
AMARYLLIDACEAE
Sternbergia clusiana + +
Ixiolirion tataricum B + +
IRIDACEAE
Iris histrio +
Romulea bulbocodium +
Romulea nivalis +
ORCHIDACEAE
Cephalanthera longifolia + +
Epipactis consimilis + + +
Ophrys fuciflora + +
Orchis anatolica + + +
Orchis tridentata + + +
Orchis romana libanotica + + + +
Anacamptis pyramidalis + +
Himantoglossum affine + + + +
SALICACEAE
Salix libani +
BETULACEAE
Alnus orientalis +
FAGACEAE
Quercus infectoria latifolia +
Quercus brantii look + +
Quercus calliprinos + +
SANTALACEAE
Osyris alba +
ARISTOLOCHIACEAE
Aristolochia altissima + + + +
Aristolochia poecilantha + +
Aristolochia scabridula + +
POLYGONACEAE
Rumex nepalensis +
Polygonum kitaibelianum + F
Polygonum cognatum +
Polygonum cedrorum +
Atraphaxis billardieri +
CHENOPODIACEAE
Chenopodium foliosum +
Atriplex lasiantha + +
AMARYNTHACEAE
Amarynthus retroflexus +
PHYTOLACCACEAE
Phytolacca pruinosa + +
11
CARYOPHYLLACEAE
Telephium imperati orientale + +
Herniaria incana +
Paronychia echinata + +
Minuartia meyeri +
Minuartia globulosa +
Minuartia intermedia +
Minuartia hamata + +
Arenaria leptoclados +
Holosteum umbellatum +
Cerastium dichotomum +
Cerastium inflatum +
Cerastium brachypetalum roeseri +
Silene aegyptiaca + + + +
Silene italica +
Silene longipetala +
Silene damascena + + +
Silene makmeliana +
Silene libanotica + +
Velezia rigida +
Dianthus strictus multipunctatus + + +
Dianthus strictus subenervis +
Dianthus micranthus + +
Dianthus libanotis + +
Dianthus karami +
BERBERIDACEAE
Berberis libanotica + M + +
PAEONIACEAE
Paeonia mascula + + + +
RANUNCULACEAE
Delphinium peregrinum + +
Consolida rigida + +
Anemone blanda +
Myosurus minimus +
Ficaria ficaroides + + M
Ranunculus hierosolymitanus + +
Ranunculus cuneatus + +
Ranunculus schweinfurthii +
PAPAVERACEAE
Glaucium leiocarpum + +
Fumaria asepala + +
Papaver umbonatum +
Hypecoum imberbe +
Corydalis rutifolia + +
Corydalis solida brachyloba +
BRASSICACEAE (CRUCIFERAE)
Gardaria chalepensis +
Biscutella ciliata + +
Thlaspi brevicaule +
Thlaspi microstylum + +
Isatis lusitanica (aleppica) + +
Peltaria angustifolia + +
Barbarea minor + + +
Nasturtium macrocarpum +
12
Cardamine graeca + +
Erophila setulosa + + +
Arabis verna + +
Arabis aucheri + +
Arabis caucasica + +
Erysimum repandum +
Erysimum goniocaulon +
Anchonium billardieri +
Alyssum contemptum + +
Alyssum mouradicum + +
Alyssum repens + +
Alyssum stribrnyi + +
Alyssum baumgartnerianum + +
Alyssum condensatum + +
Alyssum murale + F +
Fibigia eriocarpa + +
Clypeola jonthlaspi +
Hesperis pendula + +
CRASSULACEAE
Umbilicus erectus +
Sedum tenuifolium + + +
Rosularia libanotica + +
ROSACEAE
Rosa canina M +
Rosa glutinosa + +
Rubus tomentosus +
Rubus collinus +
Prunus ursina +
Prunus mahaleb +
Prunus prostrata +
Prunus microcarpa +
Amygdalus korschinskii + +
Pirus syriaca +
Sorbus flabellifolia + +
Sorbus torminalis +
Crataegus azarolus +
Crataegus monogyna M + +
Potentilla geranioides syriaca +
Geum urbanum + M +
Poterium spinosum +
FABACEAE (PAPILIONACEAE)
Lupinus hirsutus +
Spartium junceum M +
Cytisus syriacus + + +
Ononis natrix F + +
Ononis adenotricha + F
Ononis pusilla + +
Trigonella berythea + +
Trigonella spinosa + +
Trigonella brachycarpa aucheri + +
Medicago minima F +
Medicago falcata + +
Medicago sativa + + F +
Medicago x varia +
13
Medicago lupulina F +
14
Trifolium plebium + + +
Trifolium pauciflorum +
Trifolium medusaeum +
Trifolium fragiferum + +
Trifolium physodes + + F +
Trifolium speciosum + +
Trifolium boissieri +
Trifolium campestre + +
Anthyllis maura + + +
Hymenocarpus circinatus +
Lotus tenuis + + +
Lotus corniculatus alpinus + M +
Lotus gebelia + F
Lotus angustissimus + +
Securigera securidaca +
Colutea cilicica + + + M
Astragalus emarginatus +
Astragalus pinetorum + +
Astragalus gummifer M + +
Astragalus echinus + + F
Astragalus zachlensis +
Astragalus cruentiflorus +
Astragalus drusorum maroniticus +
Astragalus sofarensis + +
Astragalus coluteoides + +
Astragalus hermoneus +
Hippocrepis unisiliquosa +
Vicia narbonensis + + +
Vicia tenuifolia +
Ervum orientale +
Lathyrus nissolia + +
Lathyrus hierosolymitanus + +
Lathyrus digitatus + + + F
Lathyrus inermis + +
Lathyrus libani + + +
GERANIACEAE
Erodium acaule + + +
Erodium cicutarium + +
Erodium gruinum + +
Geranium libanoticum +
Geranium libani +
LINACEAE
Linum nodiflorum +
Linum pubescens + +
Linum bienne M + +
POLYGALACEAE
Polygala supina +
ANACARDIACEAE
Rhus coriaria M +
ACERACEAE
Acer tauricolum +
EUPHORBIACEAE
Euphorbia aulacosperma +
15
MALVACEAE
Alcea kurdica coelesyriaca +
Alcea digitata + +
HYPERICACEAE (GUTTIFERAE)
Hypericum hircinum + +
Hypericum thymifolium +
Hypericum scabrum + +
Hypericum libanoticum +
Hypericum montbretii + +
CISTACEAE
Helianthemum ledifolium +
Halimium umbellatum syriacum +
RHAMNACEAE
Rhamnus punctata +
Rhamnus cathartica M +
THYMELAEACEAE
Daphne oleoides + + +
APIACEAE (UMBELLIFERAE)
Chaerophyllum macrospermum + + +
Anthriscus lamprocarpa +
Scandix pecten-veneris + +
Scandix stellata +
Torilis leptophylla + +
Turgeniopsis foeniculacea +
Turgenia latifolia F +
Pimpinella tragium +
Danaa cornubiensis + +
Hippomararthrum boissieri +
Lecoquia cretica +
Sison exaltatum +
Foeniculum vulgare + M +
Cnidium orientale + +
Bupleurum gerardii +
Bupleurum linearifolium irregulare + +
Peucedanum depauperatum + +
ERICACEAE
Rhododendron ponticum + + +
brachycarpum
PRIMULACEAE
Cyclamen coum + +
Cyclamen persicum +
Androsace maxima +
PLUMBAGINACEAE
Acantholimon libanoticum + +
Acantholimon ulicinum + +
STYRACACEAE
Styrax officinalis + M
APOCYNACEAE
Vinca libanotica + M
GENTIANACEAE
Blackcstonia perfoliata + +
CONVOLVULACEAE
Convolvulus dorycnium oxysepalus +
Convolvulus scammonia + + M
16
Convolvulus libanoticus + F
17
CUSCUTACEAE
Cuscuta approximata +
Cuscuta planiflora +
Cuscuta balansae +
Cuscuta monogyna +
BORAGINACEAE
Cynoglossum nebrodense + +
Onosma frutescens +
Onosma sericia + +
Brunnera orientalis + +
Myosotis refracta + +
Symphytum palaestinum +
LAMIACEAE (LABIATAE)
Ajuga tridactylites palaestina + + +
Teucrium stachyophyllum +
Teucrium scordioides +
Teucrium polium + M +
Scutellaria tomentosa +
Scutellaria brevibracteata + +
Scutellaria utriculata +
Lavandula stoechas M +
Marrubium radiatum +
Nepeta italica +
Nepeta curviflora + +
Nepeta cilicica + +
Sideritis libanotica + +
Lallemantia iberica + +
Prunella vulgaris + M +
Prunella orientalis + +
Eremostachys laciniata + + M
Phlomis brevilabris +
Phlomis chrysophylla +
Phlomis rigida +
Lamium striatum + + +
Lamium amplexicaule +
Lamium truncatum + +
Ballota saxatilis +
Stachys hydrophylla +
Stachys distans + F +
Salvia multicaulis + +
Salvia tomentosa +
Salvia microstegia + +
Salvia viscosa +
Micromeria myrtifolia + M +
Micromeria graeca +
Calamintha rotundifolia + +
Ziziphora canescens + +
Ziziphora capitata +
Origanum ehrenbergii + + +
Origanum syriacum + + M +
SOLANACEAE
Solanum dulcamara + M +
Datura stramonium + M +
Hyoscyamus reticulatus +
18
SCROPHULARIACEAE
Verbascum orientale +
Verbascum tiberiadis +
Verbascum cedreti +
Verbascum tripolitanum +
Verbascum gaillardotii + +
Verbascum leptostachyum +
Anarrhinum orientale +
Kickxia sieberi +
Linaria chalepensis + +
Scrophularia rubricaulis +
Veronica polifolia + +
Veronica syriaca + +
Veronica cymbalaria + +
Veronica orientalis +
Parentucellia latifolia + +
OROBANCHACEAE
Orobanche camptolepis +
RUBIACEAE
Rubia aucheri +
Sherardia arvensis + +
Crucianella macrostachya +
Crucianella ciliata + +
Asperula arvensis +
Asperula glareosa + +
Asperula libanotica +
Asperula breviflora +
Galium incanum + +
Galium libanoticum + +
Galium verum M +
Galium peplidifolium + + +
Galium hierosolymitanum +
Galium murale +
Galium verticillatum +
Cruciata coronata +
CAPRIFOLIACEAE
Lonicera etrusca +
Lonicera nummulariifolia + +
VALERIANACEAE
Valeriana dioscoridis + +
Centranthus longiflorus + +
Valerianella dactylophylla + +
Valerianella echinata +
DIPSACACEAE
Morina persica + + +
Cephalaria stellipilis +
Cephalaria cedrorum +
Scabiosa argentea +
Scabiosa palaestina +
CUCURBUTACEAE
Bryonia multiflora +
Bryonia syriaca +
19
CAMPANULACEAE
Campanula cymbalaria + +
Campanula stricta libanotica + +
Campanula peregrina + +
Asyneuma rigidum + +
Legousia pentagonia +
ASTERACEAE (COMPOSITAE)
Eupatorium cannabinum M +
Pulicaria auranitica + + +
Gnaphalium luteo-album + +
Helichrysum c. conglobatum + + + +
Helichrysum pallasii + +
Filago anatolica + +
Tagetes minuta +
Achillea kotschyi +
Anthemis tinctoria discoidea +
Anthemis cretica cassia + +
Tanacetum cilicium +
Tanacetum aucheri + +
Doronicum orientale + +
Senecio vernalis + +
Senecio doriiformis doriiformis + +
Siebera pungens +
Carlina involucrata libanotica +
Notobasis syriaca + +
Ptilostemon diacantha +
Onopordum cynarocephalum +
Serratula pusilla +
Centaurea triumfetti +
Lapsana communis ramosissima +
Leontodon tuberosus +
Leontodon asperrimus +
Picris strigosa +
Tragopogon longirostris +
Tragopogon buphthalmoides + +
Scorzonera cana +
Scorzonera mollis +
Taraxacum syriacum + +
Taraxacum officinale + + + M +
Taraxacum aleppicum +
Steptorhamphus tuberosus +
Cicerbita mulgedioides + +
Cephalorrhynchus tuberosus + +
Crepis hierosolymitanum +
Crepis reuteriana +
20
Appendix 6
MAMMAL SPECIES LIST
FOR AL-SHOUF NATURE RESERVE
LEGEND
A1: GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES B6: SPECIES THAT ARE PERSECUTED BY LOCAL PEOPLE
A2: LOCALLY THREATENED SPECIES C7: SPECIES RESTRICTED TO AL-SHOUF CEDAR RESERVE
A3: ENDEMIC SUBSPECIES C8: BIO-INDICATOR SPECIES
B4: SPECIES THAT ARE MAINLY OR C9: ECONOMIC SPECIES
WHOLLY RESTRICTED TO MIDDLE EAST D10: EXTINCT SPECIES
B5: RARE SPECIES D11: COMMON SPECIES
INVENTORY (Based on inventories conducted by the National Council for Scientific Research.)
Priorities A A A B B B C C C D D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
INSECTIVORES
Erinaceus europaeus concolor + + + + +
Crocidura russula + +
CHIROPTERA
Rhinolophus ferrumequinum ferrumequinum + + + +
Rhinolophus hipposideros minimus + + + + +
Tadarida teniotis + + +
Myotis blythi omari + + + +
Pipistrellus pipistrellus pipistrellus + + + +
Pipistrellus kuhli ikhawanius + + + +
CARNIVORES
Canis aureus syriacus + + + +
Canis lupus pallipes + + + + +
Vulpus vulpus palaestina + + + +
Martes foina syriaca + +
Vormela peregusna syriaca + + +
Mustela nivalis +
Meles meles canescens + +
Hyaena hyaena syriaca + + + +
Felis silvestris tristrami + + +
Felis chaus + +
Caracal caracal schmitzi ? + + +
ARTIODACTYLS
Sus scrofa lybicus + +
Dama dama ? +
LAGOMORPHA
Lepus capensis syriacus + + +
RODENTIA
Sciurus anomalus syriacus + + +
Hystrix indica indica + +
Eliomys melanurus + +
Spalax leucodon ehrenbergi + + +
Apodemus mystacinus mystacinus +
Apodemus sylvaticus +
Cricetulus migratorius cinerascens +
Meriones tristrami tristrami +
Microtus nivalis hermonis +
Microtus guentheri guentheri + + +
21
Appendix 7
INVENTORY (Based on inventories conducted by the National Council for Scientific Research.)
Priorities A A B B B B C C C D D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PHIBIA
dela
Salamandra + + +
infraimmaculata
infraimmaculata
ra
viridis + + +
Rana levantina + + + +
Hyla savignyi + + +
TILIA
Testudinidae
Testudo graeca terrestris + +
konidae
Hemidactylus turcicus ? + + +
Ptyodactylus puiseuxi ? + + +
maeleonidae
maeleo chamaeleon + + + +
midae
dakia stellio stellio + +
rtidae
Lacerta laevis laevis + +
Lacerta kulzeri + +
Lacerta media + + +
Ophisops elegans + +
cidae
Ablepharus budaki +
budaki ?
Mabuya vittata +
22
bridae
Coluber jugularis + + +
asianus
Coluber najadum ? + +
Coluber rubriceps + + +
Elaphe quatuorlineata + + +
Malpolon monspessulana + + +
Natrix tessellata + + + +
tessellata
ridae
ra palestinea ? + + +
ra libetina ? + + +
23
Appendix 8
Priorities D D D C C C C B B B B B B B A A
PELECANIDAE 1 1 1 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
6 5 4
Pelecanus onocrotalus(1) + + +
CICONIIDAE
Ciconia ciconia(2) + + + + +
Ciconia nigra(2) + + + + +
ACCIPITRIDAE
Aquila clanga + + + + +
Aquila heliaca(2) + + P + +
Falco naumanni(2) + + + F + +
Aegypius monachus(2) + + + + +
Accipiter brevipes(2) + + + + F + +
Pernis apivorus(2) + + +
Neophron percnopterus(2) + + + F +
Gyps fulvus(2) + + + + pF +
Aquila pomarina(2) + + + +
Falco cherrug(2) + + + +
Falco biarmicus(2) + + + p +
Hieraaetus pennatus + + + + + +
Circaetus gallicus + + + + +
Falco eleonorae + + + +
Circus aeruginosus + + p
Accipiter nisus + + + p
Aquila chrysaetos + + + pF
24
Hieraaetus fasciatus + + + +
Falco peregrinus + + + p
Milvus migrans + + +
Circus pygargus + +
Accipiter gentilis + +
Buteo rufinus + + +
Falco columbarius + +
Falco tinnunculus + +
Aquila nipalensis + +
Buteo buteo +
Falco subbuteo +
PHASIANIDAE
Alectoris chukar + + +
Alectoris graecea + + +
Coturnix coturnix + +
GRUIDAE
Anthropoides virgo(2) + + +
Grus grus(2) + + +
SCOLOPACIDAE
Scolopax rusticola + + + +
COLUMBIDAE
Columba palumbus + + p
Streptopelia turtur + + +
Columba livia +
CUCULIDAE
Clamator glandarius + + + +
Cuculus canorus + + + +
TYTONIDAE
Tyto alba + + + +
STRIGIDAE
Asio otus + + p
Strix aluco + + +
Athene noctua + +
Otus scops + +
CAPRIMULGIDAE
Caprimulgus europaeus + +
APODIDAE
Apus pallidus + + + +
Apus melba + +
Apus affinis + F
Apus apus +
ALCEDINIDAE
Halcyon smyrnensis + p
MEROPIDAE
Merops apiaster + p +
CORACIIDAE
Coracias garrulus + + p
UPUPIDAE
Upupa epops +
PICIDAE
Dendrocopus syriacus + + +
Jynx torquilla + +
25
ALAUDIDAE
Melanocorypha calandra + + +
Calandrella rufescens + + +
Melanocorypha bimaculata + +
Calandrella brachydactyla + +
Alauda arvensis + F
Galerida cristata +
Lullula arborea +
Eremophila alpestris
HIRUNDINIDAE
Ptyonoprogne rupestris + +
Riparia riparia + + p
Hirundo rustica + +
Hirundo daurica +
Delichon urbica +
MOTACILLIDAE
Anthus cervinus +
Motacilla flava + + +
Motacilla cinerea + + +
Anthus similis +
Motacilla alba +
Anthus campestris +
Motacilla alba +
Anthus trivialis
Anthus pratensis
Anthus spinoletta
PYCNONOTIDAE
Pycnonotus xanthopygos + + +
TROGLODYTIDAE
Troglodytes troglodytes
PRUNELLIDAE
Prunella modularis
TURDIDAE
Oenanthe pleschanka + p +
Oenanthe isabellina + +
Turdus pilaris + +
Monticola saxatilis + +
Luscinia luscinia +
Saxicola rubetra +
Irania gutturalis + + + F
Oenanthe lugens + p
Turdus philomelos + +
Turdus iliacus + +
Turdus viscivorus + +
Oenanthe hispanica + +
Oenanthe finschii + +
Oenanthe oenanthe +
Oenanthe deserti +
Turdus torquatus +
Turdus merula +
Phoenicurus phoenicurus +
Saxicola torquata +
Monticola solitarius +
26
Cercotrichas galactotes
Erithacus rubecula
Luscinia megarhynchos
Phoenicurus ochruros
SYLVIDAE
Sylvia melanothorax + + +
Sylvia rueppelli + p +
Phylloscopus sibilatrix F +
Hippolais languida + +
Hippolais olivetorum + +
Phylloscopus sibilatrix F +
Hippolais icterina +
Regulus regulus + +
Sylvia borin + +
Sylvia hortensis + +
Sylvia conspicillata +
Sylvia cantillans +
Sylvia melanocephala +
Sylvia nisoria +
Sylvia curruca +
Sylvia communis +
Hippolais pallida +
Sylvia atricapilla
Phylloscopus bonelli
Phylloscopus collybita
Phylloscopus trochilus
MUSCICAPIDAE
Ficedula albicollis +
Muscicapa striata +
Ficedula hypoleuca
PARIDAE
Parus lugubris + + +
Parus ater + +
Parus major +
SITTIDAE
Sitta neumayer
TICHODROMADIDAE
Tichodroma muraria + + p
ORIOLIDAE
Oriolus oriolus + + + + +
LANIIDAE
Lanius nubicus + +
Lanius minor +
Lanius senator +
Lanius collurio +
Lanius isabellinus
CORVIDAE
Garrulus glandarius + +
Corvus corone cornix +
PASSERIDAE
Passer hispaniolensis + +
Passer domesticus +
Petronia petronia
27
FRINGILLIDAE
Fringilla montifringilla + +
Serinus pusillus +
Serinus serinus +
Serinus syriacus(1) + + +
Carduelis spinus +
Rhodopechys sanguinea + +
Carduelis carduelis +
Carduelis cannabina +
Carduelis chloris
Fringilla coelebs
C.coccothraustes
Emberizidae
Emberiza cineracea + + +
Emberiza hortulana + + +
Emberiza melanocephala + +
Emberiza caesia +
Miliaria calandra +
Emberiza cia +
Emberiza citrinella
28
Appendix 9
KEY CONTACTS
Ministry of Environment, Lebanon: UNDP, Lebanon
Tel: +961 (0)4 522222 United Nations House,
Fax: +961 (0)4 525080 Riad Solh Square, Beirut,
E-mail: info@moe.gov.lb PO Box 11-8575
http://www.moe.gov.lb Tel: +961 (0)1-981301, 981311
Fax: +961 (0)1-981521, 981522
E-mail: registry@undp.org.lb