Enbanc: Republic of The Philippines Court of Tax Appeals Quezon
Enbanc: Republic of The Philippines Court of Tax Appeals Quezon
Enbanc: Republic of The Philippines Court of Tax Appeals Quezon
ENBANC
-versus-
OFFICEMETRO PHILIPPINES,
INC. (formerly REGUS CENTRES,
INC.),
Respondent.
x------------------------------------------x CTA EB NO. 1213
OFFICEMETRO PHILIPPINES,
(CTA Case NO. 8382)
INC. (formerly REGUS CENTRES,
INC.)
Present:
Petitioner,
Del Rosario, P.J.,
Castaneda, Jr.,
-versus-
Bautista,
Uy,
Casanova,
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
Fabon-Victorino,
REVENUE,
Mindaro-Grulla, and
Respondent.
Ringpis-Liban, JJ.
Promulgated:
NOV Z~ 2016 ~ -
X---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
C.T.A. EB NOS. 1210 & 1213
Page 2 of5
Verily, the Court En Bane recognizes the Order3 dated August 5, 2013
of the RTC. However, the Court En Bane emphasizes that although
Officemetro is declared insolvent and dissolved as contained in the said
Order, it does not necessarily translate to the extinguishment of its liability
to pay the subject taxes. In fact, the Order4 dated May 28, 2015 and the
subsequent Orders 5 of the RTC show that Officemetro' s liquidation process
is still in the approval stage of the Proposed Liquidation Plan. Thus,
payment of the subject taxes is yet to be made by Officemetro and therefore,
it could not have mooted the previously resolved motion for reconsideration6
ofthe CIR.
( 1) By payment or performance;
1
Court En Bane Docket, pp. 180-182.
2
Court En Bane Docket, pp. 187-206.
3
Annex "A" of the Motion for Partial Reconsideration, Court En Bane Docket, p. 212.
4
Id., Annex "B", p. 213.
5
Id., Annexes "C", "D" and "E", pp. 214-216.
6
Court En Bane Docket, pp. 167-175.
RESOLUTION
C.T.A. EB NOS. 1210 & 1213
Page 3 of5
( 5) By compensation;
(6) By novation."
Based on Article 1231 of the Civil Code, dissolution is not one of the
modes to extinguish an obligation. To finally effect its extinguishment,
liquidation becomes a necessary process after a corporation's dissolution. In
this regard, the Court En Bane reiterates the concept of liquidation as
explained by the Supreme Court in the case of Anthony S. Yu, eta/. v. Joseph
S. Yukayguan, et a/., 7 viz:
7
G.R. No. 177549, June 18,2009,589 SCRA 588.
RESOLUTION
~.T.A. EB NOS. 1210 & 1213
Page 4 of5
SO ORDERED.
8
Id., citing China Banking Corp. v. M Michelin & Cie, 58 Phi1261, 266 (1933) and Campos, THE CORPORATION
CODE: COMMENTS, NOTES AND SELECTED CASES (Vol. 2, 1990 ed.), pp. 415,415-416.
RESOLl!TION
C.T.A. EB NOS. 1210 & 1213
PageS ofS
WE CONCUR:
~G. DEL
Presiding Justice
LOVELL~
'
BAUTISTA E~.UY
Associate Justice As;~~stice
p (On Leave)
CAESAR. A. CASANOVA ESPERANZA R. FABON·VICTORINO
Associate Justice Associate Justice
~N,M~~G~ ~- ~ -1: --
CIELITO N. MINDARO·GRULLA MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS·LIBAN
Associate Justice Associate Justice