BIBLIOGRAPHIE SUR

LES RELATIONS ENTRE

LE QUALITATIF ET LE QUANTITATIF

François Guillemette, Ph.D.

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Marie-Josée Berthiaume, Ps.éd.

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

Brannen, J. (Ed.). (1992). Mixing methods : Qualitative and quantitative

research. Aldershot, UK : Avebury.
Brannen, J. (1992). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches : An
overview. Dans J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods : Qualitative and
quantitative research (p. 3-37). Aldershot, UK : Avebury.
Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research : A
question of method or epistemology? British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 35(1), 75-92.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London : Allen &
Unwin.
Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research : Further reflections
on their integration. Dans J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods : Qualitative
and quantitative research (p. 57-78). Aldershot, UK : Avebury.
Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. New York : Oxford University
Press.
Cipriani, R. (1985). Quantité et qualité dans l'analyse sociologique : Faux
dilemme ou débat idéologique dans la connaissance scientifique? Revue de
l'Institut de Sociologie, (1-2), 181-189.
Combessie, J.-C. (1986). À propos de méthodes : Effets d'optique, heuristique
et objectivation. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, (10), 4-24.

RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES – Bibliographies – numéro 3 – pp. 1-6.

ISSN 1715-8702 - http://www.recherche-qualitative.qc.ca/Revue.html
© 2008 Association pour la recherche qualitative
1
2 RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES / BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. R. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods

in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
Crahay, M. (2006). Qualitatif - quantitatif : Des enjeux méthodologiques
convergents? Dans L. Paquay, M. Crahay & J.-M. De Ketele (Dirs),
L'analyse qualitative en éducation (p. 33-52). Bruxelles : De Boeck.
Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O. (2006). How
interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research
in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London : Sage.
Ercikan, K. & Roth, W.-M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into
qualitative and quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14-23.
Firestone, W. (1987). Meaning in method : The rhetoric of quantitative and
qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 16(7), 16-21.
Giorgi, A. (1975). Convergence and divergence of qualitative and quantitative
methods in psychology. Dans A. Giorgi, C. T. Fisher & E. L. Murray
(Eds.), Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology. Vol. 2 (p. 72-
79). Pittsburg, PA : Duquesne University Press.
Glassner, B., & Morano, J. D. (Eds.). (1989). The qualitative-quantitative
distinction in the social science. Boston : Klumer Academic.
Groger, L., & Straker, J. K. (2002). Counting and Recounting : Approaches to
combining quantitative and qualitative data and methods. Dans G. D.
Rowles & N. E. Schoenberg (Eds.), Qualitative gerontology : A
contemporary perspective (p. 179-199). New York : Springer.
Hammersley, M. (1992). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitiative divide.
Dans J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods : Qualitative and quantitative
research (p. 39-55). Aldershot, UK : Avebury.
Hedrick, T. E. (1994). The quantitative-qualitative debate : Possibilities for
integration. Dans C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-
quantitative debate : New perspectives (p. 45-52). San Francisco : Jossey-
Bass .
Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2002). Qualitative Research in Nursing (2nd ed.).
Oxford, UK : Blackwell.
House, E. R. (1994). Integrating the quantitative and qualitative. Dans C. S.
Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate : New
perspectives (p. 13-22). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis,
or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16.
 GUILLEMETTE & BERTHIAUME / Bibliographie sur les relations entre le qualitatif… 3

Howe, K. R. (1992). Getting over the quantitative-qualitative debate. American

Journal of Education, 100(2), 236-256.
Jick, T. D. (1983). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods : Triangulation
in action. Dans J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology (p. 135-
148). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
Johnson, B. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research : A
research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7),
14-26.
Kelle, U., & Erzberger, C. (2004). Qualitative and quantitative methods : Not
in opposition. Dans U. Flick, E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A
companion to qualitative research (p. 172-177). London : Sage.
Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods : When
stories converge. Dans M. M. Mark & R. L. Shotland (Eds.), Multiple
methods in program evaluation. New directions for program evaluation.
no. 35. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Ledrut, R. (1985). Le qualitatif et le quantitatif. Recherches sociologiques,
XVI(2), 229-236.
Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organisational research.
Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Lund, T. (2005). The qualitative-quantitative distinction : Some comments.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(2), 115-132.
Lusardi, P. T. (2004). Selecting a research design : Quantitative versus
qualitative. Dans J. A. Fain (Ed.), Reading, understanding and applying
nursing research (2nd ed.) (p. 191-218). Philadelphia, PA : F.A. Davis.
Luttrell, W. (2005). Crossing anxious borders : Teaching across the
quantitative-qualitative « divide ». International Journal of Research &
Method in Education, 28(2), 183-195.
McLean, J. E. (2006). Foreword : From quantitative to qualitative and half way
back. Research in the Schools, 13(1), iii-iv.
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology.
Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd
ed.). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
Morgan, D. L. (2006). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and
quantitative methods. Dans S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy, Emergent
methods in social research (p. 165-182). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods : Qualitative and quantitative
approaches (5th ed.). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
4 RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES / BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Pires, A. P. (1987). Deux thèses erronées sur les lettres et les chiffres. Cahiers
de recherche sociologique, 5(2), 85-105.
Pole, K. (2007). Mixed method designs : A review of strategies for blending
quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Mid-Western Educational
Researcher, 20(4), 35-38.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research : Quantitative and
qualitative approaches. London : Sage.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method : Moving beyond qualitative and
quantitative strategies. Berkeley : University of California Press.
Ratnesar, N., & Mackenzie, J. (2006). The quantitative-qualitative distinction
and the null hypothesis significance testing procedure. Journal of
Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 501-509.
Reichardt, C. S., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative
methods. Dans T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Quantitative methods
in evaluation research (p. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative inquiries
are not incompatible : A call for a new partnership. Dans C. S. Reichardt &
S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate : New perspectives
(p. 85-91). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.). (1994). The qualitative-quantitative
debate : New perspectives. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994). The relationship between the
qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Dans C. S. Reichardt & S.
F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate : New perspectives (p.
5-11). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
Rinaldo, V. (2005). Today's practitioner is both qualitative and quantitative
researcher. The High School Journal, 89(1), 72-77.
Ritchie, J. (2003). The applications of qualitative methods to social research.
Dans J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide
for social science students and researchers (p. 24-46). London : Sage.
Rossi, P. H. (1994). The war between the quals and the quants : Is a lasting
peace possible? Dans C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-
quantitative debate : New perspectives (p. 23-36). San Francisco : Jossey-
Bass .
Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate : The
analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educational
Researcher, 20(6), 10-18.
 GUILLEMETTE & BERTHIAUME / Bibliographie sur les relations entre le qualitatif… 5

Schwartz, H., & Jacobs, J. (1979). Qualitative sociology : A method to the

madness. New York : Free Press.
Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative vs. qualitative research : An attempt to clarify
the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation : The end
of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers.
Educational Researcher, (15), 4-12.
Smith, M. L. (1994). Qualitative plus/versus quantitative : The last word. Dans
C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis (Eds.), The qualitative-quantitative debate :
New perspectives (p. 37-44). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
Sudweeks, F., & Simoff, S. (1999). Complementary explorative data analysis :
The reconciliation of quantitative and qualitative principles. Dans S. Jones
(Ed.), Doint internet research Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Combining
qualitative and quantitative approaches. London : Sage.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use
of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Dans A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and
behavioral research Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Thyer, B. A. (Ed.). (2001). The handbook of social work research methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Trend, M.-G. (1978). On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative
analysis : A case study. Human Organization, (4), 345-367.
Van der Maren, J.-M. (1996). Méthodes de recherche pour l'éducation (2e éd.).
Montréal : Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
Wilson, T. P. (1986). Qualitative « versus » quantitative methods in social
research. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, (10), 25-51.
Yeh, C. J., & Inman, A. G. (2007). Qualitative data analysis and interpretation
in counseling psychology : Strategies for best practices. The Counseling
Psychologist, 35(3), 369-403.
Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T. S., Kalil, A., & Way, N. (2008). Mixing qualitative
and quantitative research in development science : Uses and
methodological choices. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 344-354.

François Guillemette est professeur de méthodologie et de formation pratique au

Département des Sciences de l’Éducation de l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.
Il est président de l’Association pour la Recherche Qualitative depuis 2006, de même
6 RECHERCHES QUALITATIVES / BIBLIOGRAPHIES

que chercheur associé au Centre de Recherche Interuniversitaire sur la Formation et

la Profession Enseignante (CRIFPE) et chercheur-membre du Consortium National de
Recherche sur l’Intégration Sociale (CNRIS). Docteur en éducation et docteur en
théologie, ses projets de recherche portent notamment sur l’utilisation de la
méthodologie de la théorisation enracinée (Grounded Theory) au Canada et en
Europe, le développement des compétences professionnelles dans les programmes de
formation post-secondaire, la communication en déficience intellectuelle.

Marie-Josée Berthiaume est membre de l’Ordre des psychoéducateurs et

psychoéducatrices du Québec. Elle est professionnelle de recherche à l’Université du
Québec à Trois-Rivières et à l’Association pour la Recherche Qualitative.