Bimodule - Wikipedia

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Bimodule

In abstract algebra, a bimodule is an abelian group that is both a left and a right module, such
that the left and right multiplications are compatible. Besides appearing naturally in many parts
of mathematics, bimodules play a clarifying role, in the sense that many of the relationships
between left and right modules become simpler when they are expressed in terms of
bimodules.

Definition

If R and S are two rings, then an R-S-bimodule is an abelian group such that:

1. M is a left R-module and a right S-module.

2. For all r in R, s in S and m in M:

An R-R-bimodule is also known as an R-bimodule.

Examples

For positive integers n and m, the set Mn,m(R) of n × m matrices of real numbers is an R-S-
bimodule, where R is the ring Mn(R) of n × n matrices, and S is the ring Mm(R) of m × m
matrices. Addition and multiplication are carried out using the usual rules of matrix addition
and matrix multiplication; the heights and widths of the matrices have been chosen so that
multiplication is defined. Note that Mn,m(R) itself is not a ring (unless n = m), because
multiplying an n × m matrix by another n × m matrix is not defined. The crucial bimodule
property, that (rx)s = r(xs), is the statement that multiplication of matrices is associative.

If R is a ring, then R itself can be considered a R-R-bimodule by taking the left and right
actions to be multiplication—the actions commute by associativity. This can be extended to
Rn (the n-fold direct product of R).

Any two-sided ideal of a ring R is an R-R-bimodule.

Any module over a commutative ring R is automatically a bimodule. For example, if M is a left
module, we can define multiplication on the right to be the same as multiplication on the left.
(However, not all R-bimodules arise this way.)

If M is a left R-module, then M is an R-Z-bimodule, where Z is the ring of integers. Similarly,


right R-modules may be interpreted as Z-R-bimodules, and indeed an abelian group may be
treated as a Z-Z-bimodule.
If R is a subring of S, then S is an R-R-bimodule. It is also an R-S- and an S-R-bimodule.

If M is an S-R-bimodule and N is an R-T-bimodule, then is an S-T-bimodule.

Further notions and facts

If M and N are R-S-bimodules, then a map f : M → N is a bimodule homomorphism if it is both a


homomorphism of left R-modules and of right S-modules.

An R-S-bimodule is actually the same thing as a left module over the ring , where
is the opposite ring of S (with the multiplication turned around). Bimodule
homomorphisms are the same as homomorphisms of left modules. Using these
facts, many definitions and statements about modules can be immediately translated into
definitions and statements about bimodules. For example, the category of all R-S-bimodules is
abelian, and the standard isomorphism theorems are valid for bimodules.

There are however some new effects in the world of bimodules, especially when it comes to
the tensor product: if M is an R-S-bimodule and N is an S-T-bimodule, then the tensor product
of M and N (taken over the ring S) is an R-T-bimodule in a natural fashion. This tensor product
of bimodules is associative (up to a unique canonical isomorphism), and one can hence
construct a category whose objects are the rings and whose morphisms are the bimodules.
This is in fact a 2-category, in a canonical way—2 morphisms between R-S-bimodules M and N
are exactly bimodule homomorphisms, i.e. functions

satisfying

1.

2. ,

for m ∈ M, r ∈ R, and s ∈ S. One immediately verifies the interchange law for bimodule
homomorphisms, i.e.

holds whenever either (and hence the other) side of the equation is defined, and where ∘ is the
usual composition of homomorphisms. In this interpretation, the category
End(R) = Bimod(R, R) is exactly the monoidal category of R-R-bimodules with the usual tensor
product over R the tensor product of the category. In particular, if R is a commutative ring,
every left or right R-module is canonically an R-R-bimodule, which gives a monoidal
embedding of the category R-Mod into Bimod(R, R). The case that R is a field K is a motivating
example of a symmetric monoidal category, in which case R-Mod = K-Vect, the category of
vector spaces over K, with the usual tensor product giving the monoidal structure,
and with unit K. We also see that a monoid in Bimod(R, R) is exactly an R-algebra. See (Street
2003).[1] Furthermore, if M is an R-S-bimodule and L is an T-S-bimodule, then the set
HomS(M, L) of all S-module homomorphisms from M to L becomes a T-R-module in a natural
fashion. These statements extend to the derived functors Ext and Tor.

Profunctors can be seen as a categorical generalization of bimodules.

Note that bimodules are not at all related to bialgebras.

See also

profunctor

References

1. Street, Ross (20 Mar 2003). "Categorical and combinatorial aspects of descent theory".
arXiv:math/0303175 .
Jacobson, N. (1989). Basic Algebra II. W. H. Freeman and Company. pp. 133–136. ISBN 0-
7167-1933-9.

You might also like