Selected Research Issues in The Malaysian Agricultural Sector
Selected Research Issues in The Malaysian Agricultural Sector
Selected Research Issues in The Malaysian Agricultural Sector
JamalOthman
YaghoobJafari
SchoolofEconomics
UniversitiKebangsaan
Malaysiaz.B
STRACT
The agriculture sector remains a signfficant developmentfactor in Malaysia even though its share to the nationb GDp
has shrunkpronouncedlyfrom some 30% in the 1970sto only 7% in 20 I 3. Such statisticsmoy not, however,reflect the
true significanceof the Malaysian agricultural economy.Ihhile the agricultural sector of thepast decadeswas mainly
associatedwith the production of raw commoditiesand primary processing activities, its curyent importance maybe
seenin terms of the sector b contribution to the total economy,via its inter-sectoral linkagesand multi-functional roles.
Thispaper highlights a number of issuesthat have bearings on thefuture roles of the agricultural economyin Malaysia.
Theseinclude the emergingnotion of agricultural multi-functtonality, fficient allocation of land to various agricultural
sub-sectors,deforestationand oil palm expansion,shortages ofdomestic laboafood-fuel dilemma, and extensiveuse
ofagrochemicals. Policy implications and/or suggestionsforfuture researchare deliberatedfor each issue.
ABSTMK
the sectorin the long-runto continuecontributingto the markets.The useand consumptionofsuch goodsgenerate
socio-economicdevelopmentof the nation,particularly beriefits in the form of direct use values to farmers, final
the ruraleconomy. consumers,and manufacturers.Direct use values may
Given the aforementionedbackground,this paper also be termed as marketedbenefits.Traditionally,the
highlights somemajor developmentsandissuesaffecting marketed benefits ofagriculture have been the focus of
the Malaysian agricultural sector. These include the agriculturaleconomicstheory and policies.
notion of agricultureas a multifunctional resource, The secondbroadfunctionis the productionofnon-
e f f i c i e n t a l l o c a t i o n o f l a n d r e s o u r c e ,s h o r t a g eo f marketedbenefitsof agricultureor put simply agricultural
domestic labor, deforestationand climate change,food- externalitieswhich accrueto societyat largein the form of
energy dilemma, and extensive use of agrochemicals. indirect or non-consumptivebenefits.Specific examples
Such multitude of issues without doubt signifies the of non-marketedbenefitsof agricultureinclude ecological
momentouschallengesfacing contemporaryagricultural functionssuchas flood mitigation (provenin the caseof
policy makersandrelatedinstitutions in Malaysia. Policy paddy growing areas),soil conservation,nurturing and
implications and/or suggestionsfor future researchare purification of water resource,air pollution reduction,
deliberatedfor each issue. watershed protection, heat reduction, and biodiversity
preservation.It alsoencompasses socio-culfuralfunctions
such as rural landscape formation, employment buffer,
THE ISSUES vitality of rural communities,preservationof traditional
values and attributes, health and agro-recreational
AGRICULTURE
ASA MULTIFUNCTIONAL
RESOURCE function, educationalfunction, cultural and historical
heritage, and food security. Such a systems view of
Agricultural multi-functionality is the notion that the agricultural economy is indeed consistent with the
agricultureis notjust about food production or any farm general notion of sustainabledevelopment that calls for
level produce. Neither it is any value adding activities a balancedapproachtowardsthe environment, economy
within the traditional agricultural supply chain or put and socio-culturalproperties.
simply the agribusinesssystem. Rather, agriculture Traditionally, agriculturehasalwaysbeenassociated
also producesjointly a host of other produce in the with farm level production. In addition, the measureof
form of environmental and social externalities.This its efficiency and competitivenessincluding the analysis
is illustrated in Figure 1. The figure depicts two broad of comparative advantagebefween countries generally
economic functions of agriculture. First, the production follow the sameprinciples as applies to any industrial or
of farm level produce including its associatedvalue marketedgoods.This view, and forthat matterthe gist of
addedproducts which are traded in the conventional the agricultural economicsdiscipline hasnow undergone
marked changes,given the advent of agricultural multi-
functionality.
The idea of agricultural multi-functionality has
significant influence on agricultural policy decisions
in many countries, particularly in the EU, South Korea
and Japan.A wide range of agricultural multi-functional
Marketed Benefits Marketed Benefits elements has become key components of agricultural
. Use and consumption .
policies. For instance, the nU under the Common
Envircnmental Function
offood, fiber, and raw . Social Function Agricultural Policies (cee) establishedpayment schemes
materials . Enducation Function that link the production of environmental goods and
. Cultural Functiott
. agriculture. Theseschemesprovide economic incentives
Ru'al Vitality
. Footl Security Function or payments to farmers for the provision of basic public
. Biodeversitl, goods under a sustainablefarming program (European
Commission2014).Cunently,many countriesincluding
Malaysia are deliberatingthe concept of payment for
environmentalservices(tes) which signifiesrecognition
Producers( farmers/Fishermen). to the economicimportanceofresourcesustainabilityand
manufacturers,and fi nal
consumers
servicesprovided by the naturalenvironment.
Undeniably,the elementsof non-marketedbenefits
of agriculturehave long been recognizedin one form
o r a n o t h e r i n t h e M a l a y s i a n d e v e l o p m e n ta g e n d a ,
Total Benefits of Agriculture
albeit somewhat segregatedacross the various line
rninistriesandagencies.However,the multi-functionality
FIGUREL SystemsApproachto Agriculture (Agricultural notion. which reflectsan integr-ativesocio-biophysical
MuIti-ftrnctionaIity) svsternof asricultureto date.has not rnadesignificant
.5orrllc. (20I0)
.lanral
Selected Issuesin theMalaysianAgriculturalSector
Research 129
9000
8000
o
7000
o
I 6000
5000
4000
F
3000
2000 *t*"1 _rru_t'Yf}*rfl
OrarrC\-Orrr o -car,fO-aa rrra-mrr'ro,l_
€A\O\O\Orrrr r €€€€€56
I ^tNctd-tN
2 . A v a i l a b i l i t yo f A g r i c u l t u r aLl a n d A r e ai n M a l a v s i a( 1 9 6 1 - 2 0 1 2 )
FIGURE
Srrrrtr': F,\()-FAOS fAf. Olllcialuebsitc
t30 Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 48(2)
1987 2012
Crops Sharewith respectto total Share with respectto total
Planted area Planted area
agricultural land area (%) agricultural land area (%)
Rubber l 8 8 .13 29.4 1041.5 13.2
Oilpalm t640.2 25.7 5076.9 64.5
Coconut 320.6 f, 112 1.4
Cocoa 370 5.8 21.7 0.28
Paddy 644.8 l0.l 684.5 8.7
There was an apparent structural change in the Figure 3 depictsthe changesin the pattem ofplanted
reallocationof land usewithin the agriculturalsector.This area for rubber, palm oil, cocoa, coconut, and paddy
mainly relates to oil palm, rubber, cocoa, and coconut over the 1984 to 2012period.The analysis excludes all
(Table l). other crops due to the small absolute changesin their
Additionally, Table 2 shows the changes in area cultivated area.
under the cultivation of other important agricultural crops The figure indicates clearly oil palm areahas been
in Malaysia. The major shift in terms of absolute quantity on a positive trajectory, while rubber, coconut and
of lands occurred mainly in the cultivation of fruits and cocoa demonstrateda steadydecline. Paddy areaon the
vegetables.Even so, the absolute changes in the area other hand has been rather stable. Technically, wetland
under cultivation of these crops were minute compared paddy is cultivated in areas where oil palm and other
to that of oil palm, rubber, cocoa, and coconut. perennialcropscannotbe grown. Therefore,therewas no
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
F
0
*h9r€ clo+rr\o r€O,O-dn<f €O.O-d
@€€€€ =X^^^
66600.
ddNNN NNNNN
Fi
E * ** ** _* *!. ** *r -| *
:h1,p"qr$
d
2000 *+ **- *+ **-
*iPrd.#**s
*+,*t *$ ** *+ *a"
F 1000
0
$ h I r € O, O iol m + h \O r € O\ O - al o + h \O r € C)' O * ol
€ €€ € € € O OO OO O O O O\O O OOO O O O^ O
^ -OOOC- C= O C =
- 6l ol N N o.l ol al N N N ..1 d c.l
FIGURE4. Land Use Under Cultivation of Oil Palm, and Other Crops Including Rubber,
Cocoaand Coconutin Aggregate
Source:Department of Statistics,Malaysia1985-2012
_\\___
a
E 3000
2000 -
o
F I 000
0
-NNPPPPNUPNPPP
rc a@ 6 6 @ \C.O\O \O € € € € \O \O O O C O C C OO C C - - -
4 rjO' ! @ Q C *p ur A'J) O ! @ € O * pa 5 rj O! @ € O - lJ
500
=
F
FIGURE6. Comparisons
of LandUseChanges
amongAgriculturalCrops
Soarce:Compiled basedon the Departmentof StatisticsYear Book Statisticsof Malaysia for 1985-2012
45o/owasfrom conversionofpre-existing croplandsuch deescalatedwhile the shareof forestsand other land use
as rubber. sourcesexpanded significantly. Over the 1990 to 1995
There are also argumentsthat the clearing of virgin period, the marginal ZVoincreasein the cultivation of oil
tropical forestswere primarily for the logging of timber palm was likely to have originated from the other land
(wwr 2005; Tan 2009). Consequently,the clearedarea sourcesbecausethe fall in pre-existingcropswere able
was allocatedfor oil palm cultivation. The many diverse to generatesome98% ofthe oil palm expansionarea.In
argumentslead to the seemingly elusive question on the subsequentperiods,respectively,44o/o,66ohand73o/o
whether or not oil palm plantation actually caused of oil palm area likely originated from non-preexisting
massivedeforestationin Malaysia. We examinedthis by crop land area.This trend signifies that land under pre-
comparing the shifts in land use for pre-existing crops existing crops may no longer be responsiveto any shifts
including rubber, coconut, and cocoa with changes in in oil palm demand as they did before.
land areaunder oil palm plantation. The preceding discussionssuggestthat future oil
Figure 6 comparesthe changesin land taken away palm expansionmight pose direct pressureon forest
from pre-existing crops with the increasein land under resourceswith wide implication on biodiversity and
oil palm cultivation. In the figure, the first column in each microclimate change effects, unless there is a clear
period representsa fall in pre-existing crop plantation policy shift, which emphasizes growth from value
while, the secondcolumn shows the increasein land use adding activities, particularly the high-end downstream
under oil palm plantation. industries.
The total increasein oil palm cultivation is greater
than the total decreasein cultivation of other crops in SHORTAGE AGRICULTURAL
OFDOMESTIC LABOR
aggregate.This somewhatsuggeststhat further expansion
ofoil palm hasbeenfueled by other types ofland supply. One of the most debated issues facing the Malaysian
Since the other type of land use also experiencedsmaller agricultural sector is the shortagesof domestic labor.
decreasethan the increase in oil palm plantation, it is While the contribution of agricultural employment
highly likely that the oil palm plantationexpansionoccurs (including livestock, forestry and fishing) declined very
on deforestedland. As indicatedearlier by the second substantiallyfrom26Yo of total employmentin 1990to
column in Table 3, the probableshareof pre- existing 11.4o/oin2Oll (Tables4 and 5), therewas alsoa clearshift
crops in expansionofnew land for oil palm cultivation in terms of ernployment proportion within the various
TABLE 3. Changesin Shareof Pre-Existing Crops (Rubber, Cocoa and Coconut) in Responseto Increasein Oil Palm Area
Time Changein oil Changein plantationof pre-existing Shareof pre-existingcrops Shareofother sources
Period palmplantation* crops(rubber,cocoa,coconut)* (rubber,cocoa,coconut) (including forestryarea)
tBl ( D ) =l
(A) (B) (c): ! c
A
1990-1995 453.8 -443.5 0.98 0.02
1995-2000 836.8 -467.5 0.56 0.44
2000-2005 674.6 -226.4 0.34 0.66
2005-2012 I025 -241 0.23 0.73
* Valuesare in thousandsofhectales
Sirrrca: Calculatedbrsed on tlrc StatisticsnublishcdLrvtlre [)cnartnrerrtol'Statistic.N'lalavsiaI 985-20| ]
Research
Selected Issuesin theMalaysianAgriculturctlSector 133
agricultural sub-sectors.Most notably the proportion . A grave concern is the increasing reliance of
of labor employedin the oil palm sub-sectorincreased the agricultural sector particularly the oil palm sub-
remarkably,whereasthe number of employmentin other sector on foreign labor. The oil palm farm sub-sector
sub-sectors(rubbeq cocoa, and other crops including is labor intensivewith very low prospect for effective
pepperand tobacco)declinedsubstantially(Ministry of mechanization even in the very long run. Further, there
Plantation Industries and Commodities 2010). is also little scopefor domesticworkers to be drawn into
finding employment in this sector due to the relative
structural unattractiveness,while rapid economic
TABLE4. Shareof AgriculruralEmploymentwith Respect developmentand strengtheningof domesticcurrencies
to TotalEmployment in the labor-sourcecountries, particularly Indonesia
potentially affect labor supply in the intermediate to
Agricultural Percentagewith respectto longer-run. Another related issue is the imposition of
Year
Eriolovment total emDlovment current minimum wage policy for domestic and foreign
1990 1738.0 26 labor acrosseconomic sectorsincluding oil palm and
rubber sub-sectors.
1995 1492.7 18.7
In short, how labor supply uncertainties and the
2000 1407.5 15.2 implementation of the minimum wage policy will affect
2005 t40t.4 12.9 Malaysian agriculturalsustainabilityand competitiveness
2006 t392.4 12.5 in the longer run is quite unknown empirically.
2007 1389.9 12.2
FOOD-FUEL
DILEMMAANDPALMOIL'PRICEWAR'
2008 1390.9 t2
2009 1390.8 t2.0 Another daunting challenge in Malaysian agriculture
2010 1390.3 11.6 is the increasing public interests on food security. The
widely debated food-fuel dilemma across the globe in
201r 1389.4 n.4
light of global climate change and renewable energy
,Soarce:Ministryof PlantationIndustriesandCommodities
Malaysia development issuesis indeed very relevant to Malaysia.
(2012\
Malaysia is endowedwith abundantsupply of palm
oil and thus the country has a comparative advantage
TABLE 5. Shift in Employment Within the Agricultural
in using palm oil as a renewable feedstock for the
Sub-Sectors
production of the relatively environment friendlier
biodiesel.Technically,biodieselis a product of a mix of
Pepper fossil fuel (diesel)with either crudepalm oil or processed
Year Oil Palm" Rubbero Cocoa" and
palm oil. However, as the biofuel industry expands,both
tobaccod
biodiesel and palm oil-based food products ultimately
1990 I I 5,285 98,386 50,91I 84,4s6 will be competing for the same crude palm oil (ceo)
1996 t5t,t62 49,891 2r,369 78,866 as intermediate input. As illustrated in Figure 7, cto is
2000 2s1,039 ?5 R?? 6,903 92,167 produced from crushedfresh fruit bunches(rrns) which
2004 365,000 13,385 4,001 7s,974 is further processedto producebiodiesel,cosmeticsand
2005 chemicalproducts,andwide rangesof food productssuch
362,000 II,781 3,069 74,025
as cooking and frying oil, margarine, food emulsifiers,
2006 42,800 I I,882 66,655
and cocoa butter equivalent.
2007 426,000 I 1,503 69,903 Given that Malaysia'sbiodiesel industry is
2008 438,000 n,076 7t , t 0 9 synonymouswith palm oil, there are concernsthat
2009 451,000 10,377 70,968 there will be increasedcompetition in the use of the
2010 446,368 10,8
II 69,340 same palm oil input for the manufactureof biodiesel
and the aforementionedfinal products including food.
20rt 477,9t3 10 , 8 8 8 68,8',76
Should there be insufficient supply of feed stocks,
' The number of ernployment represents workers in the plantation
and contingent on relative price changes,increases
subsectoronly
n PeninsularMalaysiaonly and not including smallholderfamilies in demand for biodiesel may result in the expansion
' For the year 2008, employment in cocoa industry included estate of oil pahn cultivation. This rnight further aggravate
workers, smallholder,grinders and chocolate manufacturing environmentalissuesincluding loss of biodiversity,
(includingentrepreneurs) carbonerrissionsand micro climatic change.Therefore,
d Number of smallholderfarniliesinvolved in pepperplantation.and
the potential provision of economic incentivessuch as
number of employment at curing stationsexcluding some 38.000
biofuel mandatesand subsidiesrnay have considerable
tobacco fanners.
Sorrrr:e:Ministry of Plantationlndustriesand CornrnoditiesMalaysia
irnpactson relatedmarketsin Malaysia especiallyfood
(2012) p r o d u c t s ,w h i c h u t i l i z e st h e s a r n eC l , o i n t e r n r e d i a t e
134 Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 48(2)
Export Market
input. Consequently,in the longer run this may lead to To what extent such policy shocks may affect the
changesin the composition of agricultural outputs in competitivenessof the Malaysian oil palm economy,
related sub-sectorsdue to the links with primary input welfare andthe environmentwill be an importantresearch
markets- land and labor resources. challenge.
Further, the Malaysian government also provides
cooking oil (largely palm oil-based) subsidies(via EXTENSIVE
USEOFAGROCHEMICALS
the Cooking Oil Subsidy Scheme) to the tune of 37
percent (ad valorem) to benefit targeted low-income The Malaysian farming sector is still dependent on
householdgroups(JamalandYaghoob2011).In light of agrochemicals including chemical fertilizers and
budgetarypressures,there have been calls for a review pesticides. These agrochemicalswhile playing an
of the cooking oil subsidies. Such a move may have important role in sustaining the needed yields and
considerableimpacts on domestic cooking oil prices ensuring adequateprofit levels to producers inevitably
and outputs.Studieshave shown that domesticcooking lead to increasing environmental damages (such as
oil marketliberalizationposenegativelong-run impacts aquaticbiodiversity) and food safety issues.In addition,
on domestic cooking oil prices and outputs, while the substantial agrochemical subsidies provided to the
the production of biofuel from palm oil may increase paddy production sub-sectorrenderthe use ofsuch inputs
substantially(Jamaland Yaghoob201l). inefficient. In the longer-run, it results in even more
Another pertinent issue is associatedwith oil intensive useof chemical-basedinputs as the natural soil
palm trade policies. The introduction ofexport tax on base further erodes.
cPo productsby Malaysia encouragesthe domestic Mineral fertilizers constitute more than 90o/oof
downstreamprocessingof oil palm products while fertilizer consumption in Malaysia. Table 6 shows the
discouragingthe export of crude palm oil. However, in upward trend of fertilizer usein the country for2002,2001
recentyearstherehasbeenan importantdevelopmentin and 2008. Table 7 further depicts the decomposition of
relationto Indonesia'spalm oil exportpolicy.ln2012, the total nutrient consumptionfor industrial crops where
Indonesia imposed new differential export tariffs on oil palm standsat 84 %, rubber 9o/o,rice 6%, while the
her exports of palm oil, which affected substantially remaining goesto coconut,sugarcane,cocoaand tobacco.
Malaysia's downstream industry, as well as exports. It is also important to note here that oil palm, as
Media reports highlighted that the local palm oil Malaysia's most important industrial crop is notably
industry lost some wt9 billion in export revenue due potash (potassium) intensive. Technically, under-
to the lndonesianpolicy (Ooi 2014).As Malaysiaand utilization of potashwould leadto substantialdeclinein
lndonesiaboth contributesome90 percentofthe global yield. The main issuewith potashas a fertilizer element
supplyofpalm oil, and the fact that Malaysiahashuge is the dependenceof Malaysia on a few global players
vested interest in related investmentsin Indonesia, (producersand exporters)who possesssufficientmarket
incoherenttradepoliciesbetweenthe two countriesmay power in terms of price determination.
effectivelymanifestinto a "price war" with potential Similar to chemicalfertilizers,the use of pesticides
adversewelfare impactsespeciallyto Malaysia. hasalsoincreased(MalaysianCrop Life andPublic health
Taking into consideration the wide range of association, 2008).Theimpactofpesticideson food safety
aforementionedissues,it is crucial to review and in Malaysia is a growing concern(Economic Planning
appraisethe irnpactsof pertinentpolicy responses U n i t 2 0 0 4 ) . T a b l e 8 s h o w st h e v a l u e o f p e s t i c i d e s
affecting biodieseldeveloprnent,cooking oil rnarket consumedfor crops vigilance in Malaysia for different
liberalization a .n d t r a d ep o l i c i e sv i s - a - v i sI n d o n e s i a . Yeafs.
SelectedResearchIssuesin the MalaysianAgriculturul Sector 135
change. CIFOR Program on the underlying Causesof . International Journal o/ Management Studies l8(2):
Deforestation. 121-144
Clay,J-2004- WorldAgriculture & Environment:A Comntodin* Koh, L.P &Wilcove, D.S. 2008. Is oil palm agriculturereally
by Commoditl' Guide to Impacts and Practices. Island destroying tropical biodiversity. Conservation Letters
Press. rQ):6044.
Corely,R. H. V& Hill J. K. 2005.Impactsof selectivelogging Ministry of PlantationIndustriesand CommoditiesMalaysia.
on canopy and ground assemblagesfor sampling. Bio 2006. National Biofuel Policy.
Conserve 125: 123-131. Departmentof StatisticsMalaysia,variousyears(1985-2012).
Department of Agriculture, Malaysia 2006. National Report YearBook of Statistic.
on the Implementation of UNCCD: Combating Land Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities
Degradation and Promoting SustainableLand Resource Malaysia.20 I 3 . Statisticson commodities20 I 2.
Managementin Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Departmentof Md. Wahid Murad, Nik Hashim Nik Mustapha & Chamhuri
Agriculture Malaysia. Siwar. 2008. Review of Malaysian agricultural policies
Department of Agriculture, Malaysia. 2010. Impact of the with regards to sustainability. American Journal o/
quality offarm servicesproviders and good agricultural Environmental Sciences4(6): 608-614.
practices in the paddy sector. Unpublished technical Mohamed Ali Sabri. 2009. Evolution of fertilizer use by crops
report,2010. in Malaysia: recent trends and prospects.Paperpreser-rted
Donald, P.F. 2004. Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural at the IFA CrossroadsAsia-Pacific 2009 conference,Kota
commodity production systems. Conserve Bio. 18:.17_37. Kinabalu, Malaysia: 8-10 December.
Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia. 2004. Economic Ooi Tee. 2014. New Straits Times Online. Averting Price War,
Instruments for Environmental Management. Ktala September1 2014. htQ://wwwnst.com.my lnodel28972
Lumpur: Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia. Tilman, D. 2001.Forecasting agriculturally driven global
European Commission. Agricultural and Rural Development. environmental change.Science 292l.281-284.
http://ec.europa.EU/agriculture/direct-support/index_ Tana, K.T., Lee, K.T., Mohameda, A.R. & Bhatia, S. 2009.
en.htm. Palm Oil: Addressing Issues and Towards Sustainable
FAO. 2009.FAOSTATOnline StatisticalService.UnitedNations Development. Renetvableand SustainableEnergt Revietvs
Food and Agriculture Organization. l3(2):420-27.
FitzherbertEB, Struebig MJ, Morel A, Danielsen F, Briihl CA, Soyka, T., Palmer, C. & Engel, S. 2007. The Impacts of
Donald PF&Phalan B.2008. How will oil palm expansion Tropical Biofuel Production on Land-Use. Tropentang,
affect biodiversity? Trendsin Ecologt & Evolution 23(10): 9-11 October 2007. Witzenhausen.
5 3 84 5 . Tey, Y.S. 2010. Malaysia's strategic food security approach.
Green, R.E., Cornell, S.J., Scharlemann,J.W. & Balmford, A. I nternational F ood Research Journ al 17(3)'. 50 l-5 07.
2005. Farming and the fate of wild nahtre.Science 307: Wong, L.C.Y. 2007. Globalization and Asian agriculture: a
550 555. Malaysian perspective. 7th Asian International Forum,
Jamal Othman . 2006. New dimension for Malaysian agriculture Fukuoka, Japan,5-6 September.
amidst industrialization. Seminar proceedings of Multi World Wildlife Fund. 2005. Agricultural and environment:
functionality and RevitalizationofAgriculture. Indonesian Palm oil: habitat conversion.
Ministry of Agriculture, MAFF Japan and ASEAN
Secretariat.Jakarta,2006.
Jamal Othman. 2007. Multifunctionality of Agriculture in Jamal Othman *
Malaysia. Edited by Nousa Noor, and Ariffin Tawang. Yaghoob Jafari**
Kuala Lumpur: Department of Agriculture, Malaysia. School ofEconomics
JamalOthman.2010.Malaysianagriculturalmulti functionality: Faculty of Economics and Management
economicvaluation and policy implications. Invited paper Universiti KebangsaanMalaysia
presentedat the 2010 Agro biodiversity Conference, 43600 Bangi, SelangorD.E.
MARDI and Biodiversity International, Tawau , Sabah, MALAYSIA
l0 - 13 May.
Jamal Othman &Yaghoob Jafari. 2011. Effects of cooking *Corresponding author; email: jortman@ukm.edu.my
oil subsidy removals on related markets: A comparative
static,multi-commodity, multi stageproduction approach.