Social and Cultural Impacts of Transportation Systems

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 43

Transportation Decision Making

Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Chapter 17
Social and Cultural Impacts of
Transportation Systems

Kumares C. Sinha and Samuel Labi


1
Outline

„ Definitions
„ Impact Mechanisms
„ Performance Measures
„ Equity and Environmental Justice
„ Procedure for Social and Cultural Impact Assessment
„ Assessment Tools
„ Mitigation Measures
„ Legislation
2
Social Impacts

According to FHWA (1982), social impacts are:

„ destruction or disruption of human-made resources,


„ social values,
„ community cohesion,
„ availability of public facilities or services,
„ displacement of people, businesses and farms; and
„ disruption of desirable community and regional growth.

3
Social Impacts
„ IOCGP (2003) defines social impacts as “the
consequences to human populations of any public or
private actions that alter the ways in which people live,
work, play, relate to one another, organize to meet
their needs and generally cope as members of
society.”

„ FTA (2005) describes social effects as the changes in


physical layouts, demographics, and sense of
neighborhood in local communities.

4
Cultural Impacts

„ According to National Historic Preservation Act of


1966, a project is considered to have adverse effects
on cultural environment if it causes direct or indirect
alteration of “any characteristics of a historic property
in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the
property’s location, design, setting, materials,
workmanship, feeling, or association.”

5
Legislation

1970 Federal Highway Act

1970 National Environmental Policy Act

1990’s Executives Orders

6
Developing Countries

„ Social Impact Assessments required by


World Bank
„ sociocultural
„ institutional
„ historical
„ political effects

„ Emphasis on Poverty Alleviation

7
Distributive Effects

„ Across community groups, population groups, ethnic groups

„ Spatial and temporal

„ Should be considered when


„ urban ROW requirement is large
„ Large displacement of households, businesses, community
amenities, historic districts and landmarks
„ conflicts with local plans
„ significant change in traffic characteristics
„ adverse effects on vulnerable segments of population

8
Impact Mechanisms

„ Direct
„ Relocation
„ Barriers
„ Integrative features

„ Indirect

„ Cumulative

9
Relocation Effects
„ Physical, emotional and financial stresses
„ Removal of formal and informal social networks
„ Vulnerable businesses include grocery shops, banks, and
shopping centers, gas stations, hotels, motels and
restaurants
„ Community facilities such as schools, churches, and
recreation areas
„ Vulnerable population segments are the elderly, low-income
families, long-time residents, handicapped persons, and
minority and ethnic group members. Also, families with
school-age children
10
Barriers
„ Roads and rail tracks can affect the structure, function and
social pattern of surrounding neighborhoods
„ Physical and psychological barriers
„ Elderly, young, and residents who travel on foot or bicycle
„ Isolation of community facilities, services, and institutions

Integrative Features
„ Pedestrian walkways, bikeways, trails and other facilities.
„ Beneficial sociocultural impacts.

11
Indirect Impacts
„ Increased traffic can lead to psychological
encumbrances that reduce the extent and quality of
social interaction in the community

„ Noise, dust, and debris, and reduced safety

„ Loss of parking affecting operation of businesses and


community facilities

„ Opening of new areas, introduction of settlers and


external intrusions, rural to urban migration
12
Cumulative Impacts

„ Combined effects of past, present and future


actions

„ Seemingly minor projects considered together


can have significant impacts

„ Counterbalancing effects of beneficial and


adverse impacts.
13
Target Facilities
„ Schools
„ Religious institutions
„ Playgrounds, parks, and recreational areas
„ Hospitals, clinics and other medical facilities
„ Residential and social facilities for the elderly
„ Social service agencies
„ Libraries

14
Target Groups
„ All persons in the impact area

„ Elderly, handicapped, non-drivers and transit-dependent


persons,

„ Minority groups

„ Low-income or poverty-stricken individuals

„ Groups vulnerable to conflict, violence, or economic


shocks
15
Performance Measures
„ Community Cohesion – the social network and actions that
provide satisfaction, security, camaraderie, and identity to
members of a community or neighborhood

„ Stability Index – to measure levels of community cohesion –


the longer the bength of time that residents lived in a
community

„ Cultural Impact – the possibility and extent of encroachment


of archeological sites, areas of historic schools, Amish and
Mennonite communities, and establishments registered with
the National Register of Historic places

16
Table 17.1

Performance
Measures
for Social
Impacts

17
Performance Measures for Cultural Impacts

18
The Issue of Poverty Alleviation in Developing Countries

„ Transportation plays a critical role in developing the economy and


strengthening the sociocultural fabric and is also critical for day-to-day
subsistence

„ Improved transportation systems facilitate the participation of low-


income residents in social, cultural and political processes and thereby
help such people to accumulate adequate physical, financial and social
assets to get out of poverty

„ Investments that reduce the distance of time to school contribute to


increased female enrollment rates

„ Increased access to local health care facilities reduces the time that
women and girls need to spend on in-home care for sick or aging family
members

„ Refer to A Sourcebook for Poverty Reduction Strategies (World Bank,


2002) for guidelines for using poverty reduction as a performance 19
measure.
Equity and Environmental Justice

„ Equitable distribution of both positive and negative


ecological, economic, and social impacts across
racial, ethnic, and income groups

„ Rawl’s Theory of Justice:


„ All social primary goods, such as liberty,
opportunity, income, and wealth, are to be
distributed equally, and
„ If such goods are not distributed equally, they are
to be distributed to favor the disadvantaged.

20
„ Environmental justice principles and issues may differ
from country to country

„ World Bank describes social sustainability as a


provision of equitable economic opportunity for the
diverse social groups

„ The attainment of environmental justice is a key


equity-related performance measure

„ Analysis of distributive effects helps to identify and


address the issue of environmental justice
21
Impacts Related to Environmental Justice*

22

*Table 17.2
Distribution of Costs and Benefits of
Transportation Projects*

Set 1:All persons who Population


accruesome of entire
benefitsfromthe region
project

Set 2: Set 3:
Persons who Populationof
incur some minority or
costsdueto low income
theproject persons
23

*Figure 17.1
„ The overlap of Sets 1 and 2 are those who incur both
costs and benefits

„ The overlap of Sets 3 and 2 refers to minority and low-


income people who are made worse off by the project

„ The overlap of Sets 3 and 1 refers to minority and low-


income people who benefit from the project

„ The overlap of all 3 sets represents minority or low-


income people who receive some benefits and also
incur some costs
24
Distribution of Project Costs and Benefits

„ Example of Atlanta Metro Using Income


Groups

„ Medium-income zones were estimated to


receive less net benefits than lower-and
higher-income zones

25
26
figure 17.2

Define the Region of Influence or


Area of Potential Effects
Identify Data Requirements

Field Visits, GIS, Identify social and cultural


Questionnaire Surveys, performance measures
Focus Groups, etc.

Identify all Potentially Affected


Individuals and Groups

Identify Social and Cultural Develop a Public


Resources and Profiles Involvement Plan
Repeat for Other
Transportation
Alternatives

Determine the Social and Cultural


Impacts of the Proposed Action

27
Impact Area

„ Influenced by the available level of


aggregation of socioeconomic data

„ Should generally include communities within


and immediately surrounding the project area

„ Consultation with state local organizations

28
Potentially Affected Groups

„ Public hearings, interviews, and surveys

„ Cluster analysis using Census data on ethnic


composition, income, car-and home-ownership rates,
etc. to identify distinct communities

„ Local government and neighborhood organizations

29
Community Profiles and Inventory of
Sociocultural Resources

„ Existing conditions and trends

„ Census data and MPO’s

„ Interviews and surveys

„ Cultural resources inventory

„ Visual maps, tables, graphs, and narrative texts.

30
Prediction of Sociocultural Impacts

„ Determination of expected levels of social and cultural


capital after implementation and assessing these
levels vis-à-vis the projected conditions

„ Judgements of expects through Delphi process

„ Response of affected public using comparable areas


or interviews

31
Evaluation of Social Impacts

Should include the following:


„ Application of screening criteria
„ if the impact is likely to occur, who will be affected, and where
and how
„ scale, severity, and extent
„ potential for mitigation
„ duration of the impact over time and its reversibility
„ associated economic costs
„ institutional barriers
„ Consideration of relevant standards and criteria
„ from professional groups and government institutions
„ Comparison with spatial (regional/national) and
temporal averages (growth rates).
32
Example 17.1

Metro-Rail versus BRT


Expert consultations, field inspections and aerial photos.
BRT provides better access to community facilities and parks;
adverse impact on community cohesion is less for Metro;
displacement of households and businesses is more for metro
due to increased ROW needs; no impact on minority or low-
income segments.
Metro will have more accessibility problem for disabled. During
construction, pedestrians, transit users, and bicyclists
experience increased inconvenience and safety risks.
Some archeological sites will be affected by metro, and BRT has
adverse effects on a historic cathedral.

33
Ratings of Various Levels of Socio Cultural Impacts*

*Table E17.1.1
34
Sociocultural Impacts of Rail and BRT*

-5 -2

-4 -1

-3.00 -2.75

Table E17.1.2
35
Example 17.2

A new highway section to serve a planned


BRT to link LBD to the suburbs. GIS analysis
of two most affected neighborhoods. Assess
the social impact in terms of community
cohesion.

36
Assessment of Community Cohesion

Table E17.2

37
Example 17.3

Use of sociocultural impact checklist

Alt 1 yields 10 adverse impacts with 5


permanent

Alt 2 yields 9 adverse impacts with 4


permanent

Therefore, Alt 2 is somewhat more desirable


38
Example 17.4

Airport runway expansion will require acquisition


of additional nearby land from an old,
established neighborhood.
Will involve significant relocation.
Identify the social groups that are most likely to
be affected and discuss the nature of their
difficulties.

39
Solution: Using census data:

a. Groups: elderly, handicapped, low-income,


households with school-age children, non-English
speaking ethnic and racial minority, and long-term
residents

b. Businesses: Small businesses that cater to local


clientele, typically family-owned, ethnic or minority-
owned.

Specific difficulties can be identified through field


surveys and interviews.
40
Tools for Sociocultural Impact Assessment: Qualitative

a. Expert consultation through roundtable and brainstorming


sessions, focus groups, and Delphi techniques for consensus building

b. Field solicitations (neighborhood surveys, interviews and


questionnaires)

c. Field solicitations for organized involvement of public bodies


- Citizen advisory groups, public meetings, community events,
special workshops.

d. Field solicitations (on-site analysis)


- Walking through common routes, recreational areas, and
places of social gathering, such as malls, barbershops, and so on.

e. Comparative analysis
41
Quantitative Tools

a. Visual tools for image or data analysis


- Superimposed maps to identify social and
cultural impacts
- Aerial photographs and GIs tools
- Overlay analysis
- Use of GIs tools to analyze the impact on
historic sites for 12 alternative projects for the
I-69 corridor

b. Statistical Analysis

c. Computer modeling 42
Mitigation

„ Preemptive

„ Minimization

„ Mitigation

„ Enhancement

43

You might also like