Reaction Paper
Reaction Paper
Reaction Paper
A Reaction Paper
Presented to
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements in the Course
Philosophy in Development Change (Dev M 704)
Submitted by
GIRBERT N. ADLAWON
September 13, 2014
The Philippine working middles classes are the most affected sector in the society in
the country are being taxed in many folds in contrast with its neighboring Southeast Asian
nations. While the country’s counterparts enjoy their living conditions due to a high
purchasing capability, ours on the other hand resorted to different forms of debts just to
sustain the necessities in life. Due to this occurrence, lawmakers in the country like Senator
Sonny Angara is pushing Senate Bill No. 2149 that would initially decrease the percentage
of income tax imposed and collected by the state to increase the purchasing capability of the
intermediate classes.
In lieu with this, the Bureau of Internal and Revenue headed by Kim Henares reacted on
the issue because it would initially delimit government’s capacity to improve and
disseminate various projects and services towards its stakeholders. However, the proponent
of the bill argued that if ever it becomes a law, it would practically improve the middle
classes’ mode of living based on the situations of other countries which embraced such form
of transition.
Essentially, the issue at hand is very timely. As we all know, the Philippine economy is
performing well in today’s time. The country’s gross national product is faring better
compared to its neighboring Asian countries. Despite the country’s economic development,
many are still making complaints more especially those in the intermediate classes.
Accordingly, they still could not feel such glimpse of change. On the other hand, the
wealthy folks who only comprise a pinch of the total percentage of the middle class are
getting richer and richer. So, it leaves a big question among us. If there is really
development, why the contributing middle classes are not feeling it despite their big
investment in terms of tax remittances from income. If we are gaining extra mileage today,
why we could not increase the basic salary of the country’s intermediate labor force if we
indeed gained from various investments. If the taxpayers’ money is just wasted due to
corruption, why we still pursue a very high tax rate by placing the burden among the middle
classes’ shoulders. If the government really intends to improve life by means of taxes why
its imposition is not equitable. The fact is others especially those above the middle class line
are not treated fairly by the country’s tax provisions. Foreign individuals are given tax
exemptions. Therefore, equitability is not fully afforded between the rich and those at the
middle. So, at this point of time, if the rich enjoys considerable favor from tax exemptions,
Corollary to this, the main point here is the practicability of the idea that the
imposition of a tax cut is really beneficial among the middle working class and, on one
hand, would not sacrifice the nation’s economic interest in a general perspective.
would only put the country in a great despair. Say for instance, tax cut means low revenues
from the government. This means that there would be less projects or services rendered to
various individuals due to financial incapability. On the other hand, the tax payers would
improved way of life, and other important things. More practically, debts to several agencies
would be minimized.
Based on the report of Senator Sonny Angara that tax cut does not affect the
financial aspect of the government and it even increases tax collections of countries which
are currently imposing such move. If we are going to make Thailand or Malaysia as an
example, their countries’ economy are as far better than ours in which their taxes are lower
in rates. The families in the said countries are enjoying the economic victories as their
purchasing power are greater than ours. We should take into account that how well each
family lives, it pointedly reflects the real face of a country. So, why we could not do the
same in our own home. Thus, increasing our purchasing power would definitely help our
country generate more income from taxes coming from goods and services that we purchase.
It would not be a great lost at all. The consumers are buying more. The producers continue
to escalate their income as consumers have increased their purchasing power. The
government as a result of this interaction collects taxes either in double or triple. This
From my personal perspective, lowered tax would definitely improve my way of life.
Currently, with the surging tax rate, I still could not feel that life is being improved. It seems
to me that the government is not giving something good in return that is worth noting at all.
By this time, I only get minimum of what I am supposed to receive and almost everything is
getting expensive. I even ended up going into various lending institutions just to compensate
taxes wherein the revenues only go to the pockets of the unfaithful politicians. Henceforth, it
would be better if the working middle class would directly benefit from it through tax
reductions.
Thus, I would be totally happy if taxes would be lowered in the country so I could
buy other important things to support life in general. Hopefully, with this type of
development in which I am very much positive of, a middle class like me could fully afford
buying a house and would not just end up renting for life.
Reference:
Angara, S. (2014, August 24). Retrieved September 9, 2014, from Inquirer.net:
http://opinion.inquirer.net/77762/overtaxing-working-middle-classes