Petitioner-Appellant Vs Vs Respondent Teodoro Gonzalez, Gabriel & Borbon

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 2586. January 19, 1906.]

TOMAS GUISON , petitioner-appellant, vs . MARIA CONCEPCION ,


respondent.

Teodoro Gonzalez, for appellant.


Gabriel & Borbon, for appellee.

SYLLABUS

1. WILLS; INABILITY TO SIGN; SIGNATURE BY ANOTHER. — The testatrix was


not able to sign her name to the will, and she requested another person to sign it for
her. Instead of writing her name he wrote his own upon the will. Held, That the will was
not duly executed. (Following Ex No. 2002, August 18, 1905.)

DECISION

WILLARD , J : p

Jacoba Concepcion Salcedo made her will in Manila, on January 3, 1904. The last
part of the will is as follows:
"Asi lo otorgo ante los testigos Señores Ambrosio Reyes, Mariano de Leon
y Felix Polintan, de Manila, Islas Filipinas, y por no yo poder firmar, firma a mi
ruego el mismo Feliciano Maglaqui, en mi presencia y de los mencionados
testigos, quienes tambien suscriben, cada uno de ellos en presencia de los otros y
la mia.
"(Firmado) FELICIANO MAGLAQUI.
"(Firmado) AMBROSIO REYES.

"(Firmado) MARIANO DE LEON.

"(Firmado) FELIX POLINTAN.


"Nosotros Ambrosio Reyes, Mariano de Leon y Felix Polintan,
atestiguamos que Filiciano Maglaqui, a ruego de la Sra. Jacoba Concepcion
Salcedo y en presencia de la misma y la nuestra, firmo el testamento que
antecede; y que cada uno de nosotros lo firmo en presencia de los otros y de
dicha testadora.
"Manila, tres de Enero de mil novecientos cuatro.
"(Firmado) AMBROSIO REYES.

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2016 cdasiaonline.com


"(Firmado) MARIANO DE LEON.

"(Firmado) FELIX POLINTAN."


It will be seen that the witness Feliciano Maglaqui, instead of writing the name of
the testatrix on the will, wrote his own. Probate of the will was refused in the court
below on the ground that the name of the testatrix was not signed thereto, and the
petitioner has appealed. The question presented has been decided adversely to the
appellant in the following cases: Ex parte Pedro Arcenas et al., 1 No. 1708, August 24,
1905 (4 Off. Gaz., 568); Ex parte Nemesio Del n Santiago, 2 No. 2002, August 18, 1905
(4 Off. Gaz., 507.)
The judgment of the court below is af rmed, with the costs of this instance
against the appellant, and after the expiration of twenty days judgment should be
entered in accordance herewith and the case remanded to the court below for
execution. So ordered.
Arellano, C.J., Mapa, Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

1. 4 Phil. Rep., 700.

2. 4 Phil. Rep., 692.

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2016 cdasiaonline.com

You might also like