EB 5 Visa News 2010 Year in Review
EB 5 Visa News 2010 Year in Review
EB 5 Visa News 2010 Year in Review
2010:Year in
Review
EB-5 Visa News
2010: Year in Review
The complete collection of EB5info.com's monthly newsletters, including professional
commentary and documents that highlight EB-5 news, issues, and events in 2010
Contents
Preface ... 4
January ... 5
February ... 19
March ... 25
April ... 30
May ... 37
June ... 47
July ... 56
August ... 67
September ... 74
October ... 84
November ... 98
December ... 112
Appendix A – USCIS-Approved EB-5 Regional Centers ... 122
Appendix B – Map of USCIS-Approved EB-5 Regional Centers ... 125
Appendix C – Top 10 Attorney Contributors ... 126
Appendix D – Top 10 Service Provider Contributors ... 127
Appendix E – Top 10 Advisor Contributors ... 128
Appendix F – Top 10 Firm Contributors ... 129
Appendix G – Top Q&A Contributors ... 130
Appendix H – Top 10 Resource Contributors ... 131
Appendix I – The Neufield Memo ... 132
Appendix J – The Startup Visa Act ... 141
Appendix K – USCIS Notice of Intent to Terminate Victorville Regional Center ... 148
Appendix L – USCIS Notice of Final Termination, Victorville Regional Center ... 157
Appendix M – Letter from Alejandro Mayorkas to Sen. Patrick Leahy ... 167
2010 saw explosive growth in the EB-5 program. The number of regional centers doubled again,
and is set to double in the upcoming months as a slew of entities flooded USCIS with applications
for designations before the new I-924 application fee went into effect in November. This process
came as capital to fund U.S. commercial enterprises continued to be scarce in the wake of the
credit crisis, causing many developers and project managers to seek alternative sources of capital
and look overseas for funding.
The number of investors applying for U.S. residency under the EB-5 visa program increased
dramatically as knowledge of the program spread and as other countries (principally
Canada’s) program for residency became much less compelling. According to USCIS, the
number of I-526 applications for residency nearly doubled from 1,028 in 2009 to 1,955, and
I-829 petitions to remove the green card conditions rose from 437 to 768.
Not all news, however, was positive. Concerns over the capability of many commercial
enterprises to create jobs as outlined in their operating agreements and according to USCIS
regulations dominated the discussion in stakeholder committee sessions and in the media.
Several EB-5 investors were denied their I-829 petitions and are facing removal from the U.S.
and loss of principal in their investments. These failures were caused principally either by
overly optimistic forecasts from developers who were not able to raise sufficient amounts of
capital in time to complete their projects or by material changes to original business plans
which may not have been disclosed to investors. The lack of a safety net by commercial banks
to provide lines of credit to entities with significant negative cash flow has proved difficult for
new enterprises and troubled business sectors seeking financing through the EB-5 program.
Many immigration attorneys are increasingly concerned with advising their clients on the
suitability of investments should project failure occur and are seeking ways to reduce their
potential liability, yet others are embracing the role of agent and finder despite the risks
involved. Issuers as well do not seem to be concerned with issues of rescission due to
improper solicitation, marketing, or the payment of fees despite guidance from securities
attorneys and regulators, or with issues of fraud by misleading investors with their agent’s
promotional activities. Investor actions against issuers, agents and promoters involved in
project failure, as well as scrutiny by securities authorities was not forefront in 2010, but that
may change as the number of EB-5 projects increases and several fail to achieve either their
immigration or commercial objectives in 2011.
As always, EB5info.com will be the source of information for the EB-5 visa program and we
would like to thank all of the professionals who contribute to our newsletters in an effort to
educate investors, attorneys and service providers in the field.
Michael Gibson
Managing Director
USAdvisors.org
January
• EB-5 Projects Receive Substantial Nationwide Media Coverage
• Attorneys and EB-5 Advisors Comment on Trends in Immigration Law
• Washington Post and National Public Radio Document Growth and Evolution of the
EB-5 Visa Program
• Effort to Create "Startup Visa" for Foreign Entrepreneurs Gains Steam
• Immigration Law Firm Miller Mayer Releases EB-5 Program Video
It's possible the project could receive additional financing from the State of Alabama down
the line, but that will be "an uphill battle" said Governor Bob Riley in comments to the local
press. ACFI will have to show the state that it has received at least $1 billion through EB-5
or other financing before Alabama will even consider assisting HK Motors in its endeavor.
2. Northeast Ohio Regional Center (NORC) – An article in Ohio's Daily Record profiled
Mike Steiner, a recently retired entrepreneur known locally for his success in the insurance
business, who be working with NORC to get its projects off the ground. According to the
Record, "Members of Woooster Growth Corp. viewed EB5 as a potential vehicle to
construct buildings" for a local "research park."
It is worth noting that NORC would not qualify for the $500,000 EB-5 investment since it is
not located in a Targeted Employment Area.
3. Noble Outreach – The Louisiana-based regional center made local headlines this
month for its groundbreaking on commercial property that will
include a restaurant, hotel, and "multipurpose conference center."
In what New Orleans City Business described as the razing of a
"pair of blighted buildings" in Algiers, Louisiana, construction of
the new facility is now underway.
And here are the "potential" EB-5 projects that made press in January:
The county wants to expand a terminal at the Plattsburgh International Airport, and it
believes EB-5 financing will prove a viable way to fund the expansion.
2. From the Colorado Business Journal comes a story on burgeoning EB-5 efforts in that
state, in particular the latest push by the development group Waveland Ventures to acquire
EB-5 regional center designation. Waveland would form the Colorado Regional Center,
which would solicit financing from foreign nationals to fund construction projects in rural
areas and ski towns. It looks like operator Chet Schwartz has been careful to pick these
locations because they qualify for Targeted Employment Area designation and can receive
the lower threshold $500,000 investment.
3. The St. Louis region is attempting to receive EB-5 regional center status in an effort to
fund "startups at plant and life science incubators and [send funds] into potential uses for
[an] old Chrysler plant." According to the St. Louis Dispatch, which reported the story,
EB-5 suddenly became a way to fund these endeavors as recession realities made it
harder to tap traditional sources of private financing.
The paper quotes Muzaffar Chishti of the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, who
responds to criticisms of the EB-5 program as a "green cards for sale" scheme by noting
that 10,000 visas is not really such a large quantity. Even if the U.S. were to issue the
maximum number of EB-5 visas available each year, he argues, they would still only make
up a fraction of the visas awarded to immigrants annually.
4. A New York state legislator is proposing that his district seek EB-5 regional center status
so that it can invest more in local tourist infrastructure – in particular a hypothetical ski
resort called the Adirondack Club and Resort.
Such a project, as the EB-5 community is well aware, would not be the first time an EB-5
regional center was set up to develop a ski resort.
Ever since the recession began, the market for H-1B nonimmigrant work visas has waned
significantly, and many immigration law firms that once considered the H-1B their bread
and butter are singing a different tune.
Demand for the EB-5 visa, which was once so obscure that few
immigration attorneys had experience working with it, has increased
substantially. Many major media publications – including the
Washington Post and Forbes.com this month – have covered the
explosive growth of EB-5 regional centers and the increasing number of
applications for EB-5 visas from foreign national immigrant investors,
and the explanation for those events usually goes something like this:
Bank aren't lending; developers need financing for their projects; they're
using the EB-5 program until the banks start lending again.
The piece also profiles Ron Klasko, an immigration attorney who runs what the
Intelligencer describes as an "immigration boutique" – the Philidelphia law firm Klasko
Rulon Stock & Seltzer – and has been traveling the globe to promote the EB-5 program to
interested investors.
Klasko also works directly with CanAm Enterprises, which runs the two EB-5 regional
centers in Pennsylvania as well as one in Hawaii and another in California. CanAm
Enterprises recommends that their investors work through Klasko's firm, although the
investors are under no obligation to do so.
Comparing the individual EB-5 process to the regional center program, the Intelligencer
turns to Klasko:
Klasko said there are numerous advantages to the regional center EB-5 application
process compared to the individual EB-5 process.
First and foremost, he said, individual EB-5 applicants are usually required to invest
$500,000 more than regional center investors are unless the enterprise is located in a rural
or high unemployment area.
Also, Klasko said, it’s often very difficult for individual EB-5 applicants to prove that their
investments have directly created 10 new jobs.
And for those individual EB-5 applicants looking to purchase an existing business and
restructure it to form an eligible new enterprise, the restrictions imposed by the USCIS have
"pretty much made that impossible."
"Our rules on expanding existing businesses are pretty tough to meet," Klasko said.
"Investors have to show net worth will increase by at least 40 percent, as well as adding 10
employees."
While it has been apparent to interested outsiders for the past year (if not longer) that the
EB-5 program has taken off and that many regional center operators are traversing the
glove in search of wealthy investors, what may not be apparent is the profound effect the
program's growth is having on immigration law practice. Many lawyers with no prior EB-5
experience are learning about the program.
Just a little over a year ago, the number of USCIS-approved EB-5 regional centers stood
at 20. Today, a quick look at the USCIS website shows 79.
ILW.com’s EB-5 Panel of Experts: Focus Changes to the USCIS/CSC
Interpretation of Indirect Job Counting
by Michael Gibson, USAdvisors.org
December 17:
The third and final phone session will be covering EB-5 Regional Centers on January 21, 2010
(registration ends on January 20):
January 18:
The focus has shifted from questions of due diligence and an internal discussion of job
creation methodologies to getting clarity from the USCIS/CSC representative on
comments made during the EB-5 stakeholders meeting in December. The question of job
counting and creation is of such great importance that the agenda of the call has been
completely changed.
The moderator of the discussion will be Lincoln Stone, who has chaired many such EB-5
panels before and is also instrumental in the submission of approved regional centers who
rely solely on the accounting of indirect and induced jobs, sometimes also referred to as
Capital Injection or Expenditure Methodology, so listeners should pay close attention as he
seeks direction from the CSC officials, in particular, Sasha Haskell, whose comments in the
stakeholder’s meeting caused the recent turmoil.
Here's my impression of their stance: The EB-5 visa exists to allow foreign nationals to
invest and create a certain number of U.S. jobs in return for a green card, and that by
simply stating that since funds have been spent in a targeted region, by default, "x"
amount of jobs have been created.
I will use South Florida as an example of why I question this methodology (please forget for
a minute that neither Miami nor Ft. Lauderdale qualify as a TEA; this is an illustration only). I
can show beyond any doubt that billions of dollars were spent to build some of the most
beautiful hotels, condos and office space this side of Dubai.
At the same time, I can also show a vacancy rate of over 80% in many of these luxury
apartments, thousands of square feet of unoccupied Class A office space, and a doubling
of the local unemployment rate. There is no question that the money was spent, but where
are the jobs? By any definition, there was a huge loss of jobs (direct, indirect, and induced)
in all sectors of the economy despite a massive investment of capital (both equity and
debt). Fortunately, no EB-5 regional center investments were located in this area at the
time, but one can see the analogy for Centers located in other regions of the country that
might have experienced job loss despite capital being invested.
I can see where the capital expenditure method works in times of rising GDP and declining
non-farm payrolls, but I do see the possible need for evidence that direct jobs were
created (in the particular EB-5 regional center investment) when the opposite is true, if only
to verify that the foreign nationals' funds did indeed create jobs through the EB-5 regional
center’s investment. One can argue that on the macro level investment would eventually
create jobs, and that might be true in the long term, but unfortunately this is a program
with a very short timetable and high standards for removal of conditions at the I-829 stage.
The long term success of the EB-5 program, I believe, will mean that regional centers
should be able to demonstrate that U.S. jobs were created or saved. Simply showing that
the investor’s money was spent may not be adequate proof to our representatives in
Washington of what a valuable program this is or that American jobs were indeed created
or saved as a result of foreign nationals investing through the immigrant investor green
card program. Empirical evidence would discredit those who say this program is about rich
foreigners “buying” green cards by showing definitive proof that investment resulted in
expanded U.S. payrolls and a greater U.S. GDP.
Opponents of the program are likely to ask for empirical data that U.S. jobs were indeed
created, not simply transferred from one location to another, or that capital invested
resulted in increased U.S. GDP through production of goods and services and the creation
of employment. It is my belief that the indirect-only capital contribution methodology does
not adequately prove the creation of jobs. It may satisfy the requirements of the law as
Congress intended, despite concerns from the agency that oversees the program, but I
feel that if the program is to succeed there should be a realization that opponents of the
program (and immigration in general) may try to block efforts to make this visa program
permanent or expand the scope for investment unless the stakeholders here can positively
prove that jobs are created through immigrant investment.
The Neufeld memo on the EB-5 program, essentially makes that job creation program
unworkable, and the Neufeld Memo on the H-1B program, literally changes decades of
established policy on the most important visa allowing U.S. companies to hire foreign
nationals. The USCIS, without any input from the users of the program (really, there was no
input), has broken the camel’s back. Absent an immediate withdrawal of these memos, it is
quite clear that in order to keep these programs workable, additional action will have to be
taken. AILA USCIS HQ Liaison Committee has sent to USCIS Chief Counsel Roxana Bacon
a detailed letter explaining how the USCIS has fundamentally eviscerated the H-1B
program, and has clearly violated the APA. I strongly urge you to read it, to understand the
depths to which the USCIS has delved in its war on the H-1B program.
Kuck goes on to state that USCIS issued the said memos so as to "curry favor" with
particular elected officials who harbor concerns about both the H-1B and EB-5 visa
programs. While he concedes that instances of fraud do crop up in both programs, Kuck
also maintains that changing the rules in a way that jeopardizes "legal and correct"
utilization of the programs is not the best way to purge either of its fraudulent users.
USCIS, he believes, has no business punishing others for its own "failure to police" either
program.
It was only "a matter of months," reports the Washington Post, before "more than 50
private and public enterprises were certified as [EB-5] regional centers, increasing the total
from 23 to 74." In a piece that focuses on the explosive growth of the EB-5 program, the
Post examines why the number of individuals coming to the United States with EB-5 visas
rose from 1,443 in 2008 to 4,218 in 2009.
The Post explains: Since "the primary motivation of the immigrant investors […] is to create
enough jobs to meet the visa requirement rather than to maximize the return on their
investment, they might prove less skittish" than a more traditional investor.
Also considered is the potential for fraud in an environment where regional centers are
springing up everywhere you look. Attorney David Morris, who was also quoted in the
piece, expresses concerns that the efforts of a few fraudulent operations soliciting funds
from foreign nationals could "poison the well" for legitimate organizations trying to take
advantage of the program.
EB-5 proponents, it seems, also fear that the process of seeing that all conditions are met
for regional center projects is still too slow. The Canadian immigrant investor program is
also seeing a record number of applicants, the Post reports, and its numbers are "three
times" that of the EB-5 program. A recent article on ABC News.com says that many
investors themselves "complain that EB-5 runs about as efficiently as the DMV," and some
have waited up to a year just to get denied and have to reapply.
Nevertheless, the EB-5 program enjoys bipartisan support. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) have even banded together to try and make the Regional Center Pilot
Program permanent. As Leahy tells the Post, "At a time when we’re seeing so many of our
jobs exported out of the country, [EB-5] creates jobs in the United States."
National Public Radio’s Jennifer Ludden has produced a very balanced and informative
piece on the EB-5 immigrant investor visa program.
In the audio broadcast published this month, she speaks with an English investor about his
investment in the Marriott Hotel
project run by EB-5 principal
Henry Liebman of the American
Life Seattle Regional Center and
with EB-5 Regional Center
Principal Ron Drinkard of
America's Center for Foreign
Investment (ACFI).
Krikorian also believes EB-5 is a way for rich foreigners to simply “buy a green card."
Muzaffar Chishti of the Migration Policy Institute then notes that the majority of EB-5
investors have been from Asia, predominantly from China, and that despite the recent
upsurge in applicants, the visa program is still widely underutilized.
Brian Thompson, the American Life EB-5 visa immigrant investor from England, states that
if the program were better publicized, there would be more demand for the visas.
Currently, the program is relatively unknown outside of the United States.
The following two articles were written by Michael Gibson of USAdvisors.org in response
to recent attention given to the push for a startup visa bill in both the U.S. House of
Representatives and Senate. Both articles originally appeared on EB-5 Visa News.
From the Wall Street Journal comes a story EB-5 Visa News reported some time ago that
illustrates the efforts of a group of U.S. venture capitalists in organizing a grassroots
movement to modify the EB-5 immigrant investor visa so that foreign entrepreneurs can
come to the United States under a “start-up” visa program and obtain their U.S. green
card in exchange for creating U.S. jobs.
The proposal, which has recently gotten the support of several congressmen and senators
in Washington and lawmakers across the country, is similar to the EB-5 visa in that it
provides the investor with a conditional green card in exchange for his or her investment,
but unlike the EB-5 visa “pilot” or passive regional center program, the start-up visa
requires that the investor also be actively engaged in the formation of the venture and
creation of U.S. jobs. That would mirror more closely the traditional or “stand-alone” active
EB-5 visa, sometimes referred to as the "Million Dollar Green Card," but would allow the
foreign born investor to qualify for entry for a lower amount.
The effort is headed by very well known venture capitalists Brad Feld, Dave McClure, Eric
Ries, and others, and the effort is both well funded and organized. They are already using
their intimate knowledge of social media tools like Twitter to promote awareness and
understanding of the program, and have managed to send several thousand Twitter feeds
to members of Congress in support of their ideas.
This quote from their website illustrates the point that not only is foreign capital or equity
needed for the enterprise to be successful, but also the entrepreneurs themselves:
The United States has a similar program – the EB5 visa category, which allows immigrants
to invest $1 million or more and generate ten jobs as part of that investment. However,
that category is limited to investors, and not the entrepreneurs who are going to drive that
value creation. The impact of this visa category could be dramatically increased if we focus
on the entrepreneur who creates the business, as opposed to focusing solely on the
investor holding capital. Small changes can dramatically increase the efficacy of this
program and increase our economic competitiveness in the future.
If you would like to know more about the Startup Visa, you can visit the website here.
Tracking of their campaign results can be found here.
First off, the EB-5 requires that an immigrant invests $1 million (or $500,000 under certain
circumstances) of their own money in a new business. This rule ignores the fact that tech
startups are often backed by venture capitalists, and it overemphasizes the role of money
instead of assessing a foreigner’s talent and ambition as primary factors. The EB-5 is also
only given to immigrants who can promise to create 10 full-time jobs within 2 years, which
doesn’t mesh well with the reality that successful startups (while creating plenty of new jobs
in the medium and long-runs) often maintain deliberately low head counts in the short-run.
This emphasis on allowing the foreign born entrepreneur to come in and create a company
that employs Americans through his or her hard work, effort, and ingenuity rather than
solely through the investment of capital is quite different from the current EB-5 immigrant
investor visa program.
At some point, the efforts of those involved in the EB-5 community will have to reach out
to these individuals to see if there is common ground and/or to carry the message to our
representatives in Washington that foreign investment in the United States is good for
creating jobs and increasing the standard of living for both the immigrant investor/
entrepreneur and American citizens as a whole.
Miller Mayer Releases Video Explaining EB-5 Program Basics
From New York immigration law firm Miller Mayer comes this video, which is arguably the
most concise description of the EB-5 visa program yet made available by any EB-5
practitioner. Thanks goes out to Miller Mayer for making this available.
As Lynch notes, "There’s plenty of competition out there for investment dollars, and we’ll
be calling on our local EDCs, chambers of commerce, business authorities and investor
groups to help us sell mid-Michigan." Competition among regional centers – there are now
nearly 80 – has certainly grown fiercer since the dawn of the economic downturn and
subsequent hunt for alternative sources of financing.
Lynch continues, "We know that [mid-Michigan is] fertile ground to grow successful
businesses, but we need to prove it, and we will." EB-5 MRC will begin soliciting funds for
its projects in what is perhaps the most fertile ground of all for regional centers – The
People's Republic of China.
From Charles Child of Automotive News comes a very skeptical view of Hybrid Kinetic
Motors Corporation's plan to produce a line of “green” hybrid cars through the EB-5 visa
immigrant investor program. As EB5info.com reported last month, there was concern from
within Alabama about the large number of investors needed by
America’s Center for Foreign Investment (ACFI) before the State of
Alabama would provide any funding or incentives.
Nor does Child accept that the quality of HK automobiles will rival
that of Mercedes Benz, an assertion that comes straight from the
lips of HK CEO Chuantao Wang.
HK Motors hopes to
build cars like this
Italian-designed Whether HK Motors will ultimately produce cars in as great a
Quaranta. volume and as of fantastic quality as its leaders contend may be
beside the point. The automaker is already soliciting funds from
wealthy Chinese investors through ACFI, the only EB-5 regional center in Alabama. If the
center is able to raise $1 billion in total capital investment, it's likely that the state will help
foot the bill.
HK Motors would not be the first Asian carmaker in recent years to build a plant in the
region. Hyundai built a factory near Montgomery in 2002, and KIA opened a facility just
across the Georgia border in 2007. Car manufacturing plants are labor-intensive
enterprises that bring jobs to communities. If there is a market for the product, there are
jobs for the taking.
Citing its use of the EB-5 program, Child says HK's "plans have little to do with making
cars." However, if cars are not made and no jobs are created, the potential for EB-5 would
not exist.
For now, the State of Alabama will wait and see if ACFI comes up with the funds.
A press release from Twin Development LLC outlines the group's plan to bring a mixed-
use development to Federal Way, Washington.
The press release quotes Twin Development Co-Manager, Steve Smith: "This project is
further confirmation of the Pacific Northwest’s status as an international gateway. […] By
leveraging the opportunity presented by the EB-5 program, we can broaden access to
foreign capital sources while providing a lucrative opportunity for international investors."
Twin Development Regional Center joins American Life, one of the oldest, most
established regional centers, and Whatcom Opportunities in offering foreign nationals an
investment opportunity in Washington State.
According to Reuters:
Fiscally fragile euro-zone countries like Greece, Portugal and Spain are under intense
pressure to rein in huge budget deficits, aggravated by a steep economic downturn and
billions of euros in stimulus spending. Their financial woes have hit investor confidence in
the European single currency bloc and even sparked speculation that a country could be
forced out of the euro area.
As EU countries struggle to retain their financial integrity, rising costs will make it unlikely
that even the lure of EB-5 visas will bring European foreign nationals to the U.S. in large
numbers. A much more likely scenario is that Asian nations in less dire financial straits than
the EU, in particular China and South Korea, will continue to send the largest number of
EB-5 recipients to the U.S.
According to NVC:
Most prospective immigrant visa applicants qualify for status under the law on the basis of
family relationships or employer sponsorship. Entitlement to visa processing in these
classes is established ordinarily through approval by Citizenship and Immigration Services
(CIS) of a petition filed on the applicant’s behalf. The petitions of applicants who will be
processed at an overseas post are forwarded by CIS to the Department of State;
applicants in categories subject to numerical limit are registered on the visa waiting list.
Each case is assigned a priority (i.e., registration) date based on the filing date accorded to
the petition.
EB-6 recipients would not be able to count family members employed by a new enterprise
toward the total of 5, but only U.S. citizens they employ. By contrast, the EB-5 visa
requires that an investment from a foreign national create at least 10 new jobs.
According to Dave McClure, who organized a trip to Washington in which Silicon Valley
venture capitalists lobbied members of Congress in support of the bill, "job creation is a
national priority. […] With the Startup Visa Act, we can create thousands of new jobs
immediately, and tens of thousands more as these new startups grow into the next
Googles, Yahoos, and eBays of their generation."
Business-centered media outlets were all abuzz with last month's introduction of the EB-6
bill. An article in BusinessWeek cites venture capitalist Jeff Clavier, who says investors
"sometimes shy away from even compelling pitches from overseas startups in part
because of visa-related hassles" endemic to the status quo. Clavier claims he would likely
"give more favorable consideration" to foreign entrepreneurs soliciting funds were the new
visa category approved.
Critics of the bill cite its potential for loopholes, in particular the possibility that foreign
entrepreneurs would get to stay in the United States even if their businesses fail.
BusinessWeek quotes Kim Berry, who heads the Programmer's Guild trade group: "We're
not opposed to the concept. We're opposed to the loopholes."
If the Startup Visa Act becomes a reality, it's also not exactly
clear whether it would "compete" in any way with the EB-5 visa
program. To obtain an EB-5 visa, an immigrant must invest at
least $500,000 of his or her own money in a U.S. business. The
EB-5 would seem to cater to a different class of prospective
green card recipient than the EB-6.
NPR also quotes Stephen Yale-Loehr of Miller Mayer, who claims EB-5 is a "win-win-win"
for U.S. businesses, jobseekers, and immigrant investors. While the program has (and
likely always will) have some critics – the Federation for American Immigration Reform, for
example, calls EB-5 a "pay-for-play" system – more immigrant investors are utilizing the
program every year.
Sometimes the immigrant investors who actually stay in the U.S. are not the investors
themselves, but their children, notes NPR. Wang Wei, a 22-year old student, will be staying
in the U.S. because "his father is giving him a half a million dollars to invest in a mini-mall in
the city of El Centro."
International Immigration Services Attorneys Publish Major EB-5
Article
Mr. Meyer and Ms. Caco examine the growth of the Regional Center
program in recent years, offer theories on why growth is occurring,
and examine the EB-5 program from a historical perspective. This
historical perspective yields the not-so-comforting conclusion that the
EB-5 program is only as stable as USCIS wants it to be. Therefore,
political and bureaucratic risk in the EB-5 context should never be
Karen Caco minimized.
Mr. Meyer and Ms. Caco also provide a helpful overview of the process for establishing a
regional center in light of recent changes in the Regional Center program stemming from
the December 2009 USCIS memo.
“Spreading Like Wildfire” is the first installment in a two-part series written by Mr. Meyer
and Ms. Caco. The second installment, scheduled for publication in the next issue of
Immigration Briefings, will highlight day-to-day issues faced by regional centers and
attorneys who are actively practicing or seeking to practice in the EB-5 arena.
Readers interested in finding out more about this article should contact the authors
directly: Brandon Meyer (Brandon@ezusimm.com) or Karen Caco (Karen@ezusimm.com).
The meeting is open to all AILA members by RSVP only. If you wish to attend, please
RSVP with Robert Nadalin (robert@nadalinlaw.com) before March 8, 2010.
April
• EB-5 Initiatives in California, Mississippi, Indiana, and New England Gain Traction
• The Startup Bill: Actual Language Now Available
• Experts to Host Seminar Focused on Essential Issues in EB-5 Practice
The United States is the world’s largest recipient of foreign direct investment, helped by its
open economy, stable government, rule of law and huge consumer market. More than
$300 billion of such investment flowed into the United States in 2008, according to the
International Trade Administration.
Foreign companies employed 605,600 California workers in 2007, the last year for which
data were available, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Nearly one-quarter of
these workers were employed in manufacturing.
Attracting new industries is key to the Inland Empire’s growth. The region, which comprises
the more populous parts of Riverside and San Bernardino counties, has shed 183,600 jobs
since December 2006, many of them in construction and logistics.
“The two most important sectors for us were arguably the ones that were hit the worst,”
said Marc Weidenmier, professor of economics at Claremont McKenna College. “This area
needs to develop other things.”
One example of a foreign company that has recently invested in the Inland Empire region is
Nepco, a South Korean manufacturer of picture frames. Reasons Nepco cites for its
decision to locate operations in a state with a reputation for being expensive include
proximity to 37 million consumers and good transportation systems to get materials
shipped in and goods shipped out.
Although wages in the U.S. are higher than they would be overseas, says Tommy Kim,
Nepco's U.S. Director of Operations, the company saves time by not having material sent
back to China before being shipped (again) to the U.S. and placed on a display shelf.
Like neighboring San Bernardino County, Riverside County recently passed a resolution
that would encourage foreign investment through the EB-5 program. California currently
contains more EB-5 regional centers than any other state.
With over 80 EB-5 regional centers now operating, few states want to miss out on the
opportunity to secure foreign investment dollars through the EB-5 program, and Indiana is
no exception.
The Ball State Daily News has just reported that Delaware County, Indiana will court foreign
national immigrant investors who want to receive a green card for themselves and their
families by investing in a U.S. business. The county will try to receive immigrant investor
dollars through its work with a company called Energize East Central Indiana, which seeks
investment in logistics, advanced manufacturing, and food processing and distribution.
Terry Murphy, vice president of Economic Development in Delaware County, said this
summer Delaware County officials will try to attract foreign business from Japan, China,
Europe and possibly Turkey.
“I only see a plus side to it,” he said. “New businesses will bring construction jobs here as
well. All the service industries will benefit.”
Murphy said initial job creation could result in job opportunities for students and those just
out of college.
So far no foreign companies are on board with the program, and Hicks said it’s hard to
speculate when the program will actually get started.
If Indiana is able to sell investors on its solvency and what Hicks terms its "trustworthy tax
system," foreign investor dollars via the EB-5 program may help curb the trend of static job
growth that plagued Central Indiana even before the most recent recession.
Seaway Valley Pursues EB-5 Regional Center for Six States
According to a press release published this month, holding company Seaway Valley
Capital Corporation is partnering with ACG Consulting to create a new EB-5 regional
center that will cover six states in the Northeast. In
what appears to be a large potential investment zone
(land in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine would be
included), the company plans to fund projects for
Hackett’s Stores, a retail sales outfit, and the Harbor
Brewing Company.
Seaway Valley is located in Sackets Harbor, New York, and the new regional center would
presumably have its headquarters at the holding company's current office address. There
are currently three USCIS-approved EB-5 regional centers in New York state.
For readers looking for the actual bill introduced by Senators Kerry (D-MA) and Lugar (R-
IN), it is now available here.
The following comments come from Will Herman, well known entrepreneur and incubator
of several startups:
Simply put, anyone from anywhere
who starts a company in the U.S.
and is able to reasonably capitalize it
can get a visa to stay in this country
to develop their business here, on
American soil with American
employees, paying American taxes.
The new legislation is supported with over 100 signatures from leading venture capitalists
and angel investors throughout the country. I’m honored that my name is included on the
list. Not because I’m an investor looking for more deals, but I’m an American with an
insanely strong desire to see this country continue to set the pace for the rest of the world
when it comes to opportunity and leadership.
Relatively speaking, the streets of the US are, in fact, paved with gold. I’d like to see us
keep it that way and to provide opportunities for even more Americans to be able to mine
it.”
Beginning Thursday, April 29, a number of EB-5 experts and practitioners will participate in
a phone seminar to discuss key issues surrounding the EB-5 visa program. Among the
topics to be discussed are EB-5 indirect jobs, direct jobs, and induced jobs, risks for EB-5
investors, a breakdown of the regional center/business structure, and changes made to
the EB-5 program since the 2009 USCIS memorandum.
Speakers will include Michael Gibson of USAdvisors.org, attorney David Morris, professors
John Barrett and Scott Barnhart, Melissa Krinzman of Venture Architects, and Jason Oleet
of Oleet & Co.
USAdvisors.org wrapped up its Midwest tour with visits to Chicago, Illinois and East
Lansing, Michigan. In the Windy City, Michael and George met with Taher Kameli of the
Chicagoland Foreign Investment Group in addition to other immigration attorneys and
EB-5 practitioners. The stop in East Lansing included visits with attorney Bob Hood of
Willingham & Cote and Jim Lynch of the Michigan Regional Center Global Investment
Program. Based in Saginaw, the Michigan regional center is one of two in the state, and its
most recent press release states its mission to use the USCIS EB-5 visa program to
“rebuild the [Michigan] economy.” Mr. Lynch, no stranger to new product development,
has over two decades of experience in early stage venture capital investment.
Since hitting the road, Michael also managed to participate in two installments of the ILW
“Investor Options for Experts” phone seminar series, topics for which included
methodology-related questions about direct jobs, indirect jobs, and induced jobs as well
as what a regional center is, how it operates, business models for the regional center, and
risk factors for EB-5 investors. Other speakers included David Morris, Scott Barnhart,
Melissa Krinzman, Jason Oleet, and John Barrett, all of whom are either immigration
attorneys, EB-5 service providers, or EB-5 visa specialists. This phone seminar series will
continue throughout the spring and early summer.
Other organizations visited by USAdvisors.org on its Midwest tour included the following:
• Dunbar Harder, a full-service immigration law firm in Houston; Attorneys Ken Dunbar,
Terry Weir, April Thompson Nakanishi, Christin Burns, and Amy Donnelly Ashby
• Clara Dematteis Mager, Marie Alsace Galindo, Michele Polito, Du Zhiguo, and Amy
Orlowski of Butzel Long (Detroit, MI)
For this impending endeavor, she will film regional centers on the West Coast, in particular
the newly-approved Northern California Regional Center, where center principals Jake and
Stephen Weststeyn are planning an agricultural project that they anticipate will "generate
$170 million in economic activity" according to a recent press release.
Other stops in California include the Bay Area Regional Center, California Wineries &
Vineyards Regional Center, LLC, CMB McClellan Park, and the California Global Alliance
Regional Center.
The following is an excerpt from Karen Caco’s account of the first stop on the tour:
"Our first stop [...] was at California Wineries & Vineyards Regional Center, LLC ("CWVRC")
started and operated by Christina Lau. [The center includes] the geographic area of Napa
County [...] Christina was kind enough to meet with us for two+ hours and shared her
vision for this Regional Center. [...] A well thought out plan indeed."
Earlier this month, Ms. Caco's firm, International Immigration Services, PA, released this
press release:
Karen Caco of International Immigration Services, PA (“IIS”) has started her filming of EB-5
Regional Centers throughout the United States. The first filming will be done in Northern
California and starts next week. IIS Associate Attorney Brandon Meyer is accompanying
her.
They are filming 3 Regional Centers at this time; Northern California Regional Center in
Stockton, CMB, McClellan Park in Sacramento and California Global Alliance in Selma.
Remaining the only Attorney in the world to actually visit and film the Regional Centers and
their projects, this is the second trip for Karen Caco. The inaugural tour and filming was
undertaken in 2007 when there were less than 20 Regional Centers in the United States.
At the time, she completed the filming in collaboration with Michael Gibson. Today with
more than 80 Regional Centers, both have decided that it made more sense to divide up
the filming of these 80+ Regional Centers throughout the remainder of 2010.
Karen and Brandon will conduct interviews and collect film footage that will be used for
future DVD’s and media with USAdvisors.org. Filming the production for IIS is Javier Araujo
with 360 Image Design, a well-known professional artist, photographer and videographer.
Brandon and Karen recently wrote two EB-5 articles on business immigration; “Now for the
Hard Part: Attracting Investors to EB-5 Regional Centers.” Immigration Briefings (March
2010), and “Spreading Like Wildfire! What Explains the Explosive Growth of EB-5 Regional
Centers?” Immigration Briefings (February 2010), both published by Thomson Reuters.
Keep track of Karen and Brandon and their filming at EB5info.com and at
www.easyUSimmigration.com.
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has just granted EB-5 regional center
status to the Northern California Regional Center, and the new center’s principals are
optimistic about bringing jobs and economic growth to the region.
According to an April press release, the center’s “first project, an agricultural development
project, will create a large impact on Northern California, generating $170 million in
economic activity both directly and indirectly.” Of course, no EB-5 visa project can get off
the ground without investors, but center principals, Jake and Stephen Weststeyn, feel that
the design of the EB-5 program holds promise for a region hit hard by the economic
recession.
As for acquiring investors, Stephen Weststeyn says there are tentative plans to take a trip
to China and participate in EB-5 seminars. “We’re probably going to focus most of our
efforts on Asia,” he says.
While traveling to Asian countries for the purpose of promoting an EB-5 visa project is not
the least bit uncommon in today’s environment, getting to this point has been a long time
coming for the Weststeyns and the Northern California Regional Center. It was two and a
half years ago when a Wall Street Journal article about the EB-5 program first snagged
their mutual attention.
After reading “a follow-up article in Forbes that piqued [their] interest,” according to
Stephen Weststeyn, they finally determined that a new regional center based in Stockton,
California would be an excellent way to utilize the program.
“In the early days, there wasn’t too much online about EB-5,” say the Weststeyns, “It was
through Michael’s [Michael Gibson of USAdvisors.org] DVD that we learned about the
program. He was one of the first people we got in touch with when we started all this.”
After making the decision to become a regional center under the EB-5 visa program,
navigating through the Department of Homeland Security’s approval process, and finally
getting the coveted letter of approval from USCIS, the Northern California Regional Center
is ready to become a viable force for economic growth in a region where there is a great
need for job creation.
“I think there is a lot of opportunity for our regional center in the area,” says Stephen
Weststeyn, “I think it will open things up for a lot of jobs.”
According to a statement from the desk of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), “Senators Reid,
Schumer, and Menendez have released a productive framework for the process of drafting
comprehensive immigration reform legislation.” Among the many reforms included in the
proposal is a permanent extension of the EB-5 Visa Program, which Senator Leahy
supports.
“I hope the outline released today will encourage discussions across the aisle, and that they
will lead to a bipartisan legislative proposal. All Americans are concerned with updating our
immigration laws, fulfilling our labor needs, and addressing the escalating violence along
our southern border. I hope we can come together to address these pressing matters.”
EB-5 Program To Fund Redevelopment Of Brooklyn Navy Yard in New
York City
New York’s first regional center is making the Navy Yard its initial investment. There are 95
other regional centers across the country. New York has two others serving Buffalo and
upstate. California, with 26 regional centers, has the most in the nation.
The New York City Regional Center LLC wanted to target a project in an area with high
unemployment that would also have government support, said George Olsen, the group’s
managing principal.
The unemployment rates in the neighborhoods that border the Navy Yard were 14.8% in
Bedford-Stuyvesant, 9.9% in Fort Greene and 7.9% in Williamsburg, according to figures
from the third quarter of 2009, the latest available from the Fiscal Policy Institute.
The Navy Yard currently houses 242 businesses and has 5,000 employees working in
industries such as e-commerce, manufacturing and film.
The paper also reports that the city is paying "an additional $81 million for infrastructure
upgrades." The $125 million raised through the EB-5 program will be divided nearly equally
between the Steiner Studios project and green jobs creation project.
Leading Immigration Attorneys to Speak at EB-5 Visa Seminar in New
York City
Geared toward the immigration attorney needing to know more Stephen Yale-Loehr
about the EB-5 program, be it rudimentary knowledge or a more in-
depth understanding of particular EB-5-related topics, the seminar
will last from 6:00 to 9:00 PM.
According to Stephen Yale-Loehr, this seminar "will cover all aspects of the EB-5 program,
from basic to advanced issues."
An instructor at Cornell Law School in Ithaca, New York, Mr. Yale-Loehr is also a practicing
attorney with Miller Mayer, LLP and a well-known name in the EB-5 community. For more
than a quarter of a century, Mr. Yale-Loehr has practiced immigration law and is often cited
as an expert when it comes to the USCIS EB-5 visa program.
“Attendees will gain an appreciation for the complexities of the program” as well as when
the visa is or is not appropriate for particular clients, says Mr. Yale-Loehr. Non-AILA
members can still attend the seminar for $50, which will be payable at the door.
For those considering attending the event who have additional questions about seminar
topics, discussions, or other matters relating to the event itself, Stephen Yale-Loehr can be
reached at swy1@cornell.edu or (607) 273-4200 x 318.
EB-5 Directory To Be Distributed AT AILA Conference, Other Events
Tuesday, June 1 is the last day for regional centers, firms, and other EB-5-related
organizations to sign up for the 2010 USAdvisors.org EB-5 Regional Center Directory. The
directory will be distributed at this year’s AILA conference, the EB-5 Investors Conference
in Boston this August, and a host of additional EB-5 events and seminars.
Net profits for the directory will be donated to the Wounded Warrior Project. For additional
information or to sign up, see the EB-5 Directory page at EB5info.com.
June
• Wall Street Journal and CNBC Cover the EB-5 Program Before a National Audience
• South Dakota EB-5 Effort Saved at the Last Minute by State Government
• Projects in Alabama and Michigan Receive USCIS Approval
• Victorville One of the "Most Successful" Regional Centers Declares Principal
• Western Governor Travels to China Seeking EB-5 Visa Program Investors
• List of Florida Regional Centers Continues to Grow
Greg Siskand, an immigration attorney with Siskand Susser, was also quoted by the
Journal: "I’ve not heard of the big Wall Street firms being involved in a major way in this
business, so I think it’s an area of opportunity."
For financial advisors who would like to enter the immigrant investor market, Gibson and
Siskand provide these recommendations:
“If they have foreign language skills and can cater to these individuals,” that’s a huge advantage,
Gibson notes.
Since most centers haven’t been operating long enough to complete their projects or establish an
investment track record, Gibson said he fears that many projects marketed to investors “won’t be
successful commercially, or in terms of job creation.”
Regional Centers and immigration lawyers are good sources of referrals for EB-5 clients, but they
rely on referrals, too. Many centers pay about $25,000 for investor referrals, Gibson said.
In closing, the Journal notes that investors who participate in the EB-5 program should be
prepared to have their funds tied up for several years. According to Siskand, there may
also be significant "uncertainty about the end of the process."
CNBC's Take on the EB-5 Visa Program: "If you want to come to
America, money talks."
CNBC profiled the EB-5 visa program this month, acknowledging both the regional center
platform as well as those investors who utilize the EB-5 program as individuals.
One immigrant investor interviewed for the special was Grant Fraser, a Canadian
entrepreneur and founder of Utah-based Navigator, which CNBC describes as an "award-
winning" computer software company.
Hope not Lost for EB-5 Investors in South Dakota Agriculture Project
The South Dakota Banking Commission may have just saved several EB-5 investors from
losing their opportunity to obtain U.S. residency. According to American News, a small
group of investors will be able to make a short-term $30 million construction loan to
Northern Beef Packers, a South Dakota company, without obtaining a state lending
license.
Additional financing for the program has already come in the form of investments made by
wealthy foreign nationals participating in the U.S. EB-5 visa program. Were the State of
South Dakota not to allow an additional avenue for financing, the project may very well
become a financial failure, compromising the ability of investors to receive their green
cards.
The project, which began in 2005, involves the use of an empty building that currently "has
many liens and other claims against it," according to the press. Capital raised by the
original investors, among them EB-5 immigrant investors, is still insufficient to make the
new beef packing plant operational. The $30 million obtained from Epoch, however, should
be enough to convert the building in question into a beef packing facility and close any
gaps in financing.
At the hearing, Steve Sanford, the attorney representing Epoch, reportedly stated, "I think
we need to be grateful we live in a state where we can get this kind of thing done with
dispatch." EB-5 investors are likely to feel the same way.
As a columnist for the Montgomery Advertiser points out, the project must receive at least
$1 billion in financing before the State of Alabama is willing to cut the regional center a
check. Since initial funding for the HK Motors project will largely come from the EB-5
program, the regional center will need to find an extraordinarily large number of investors if
it is to receive any additional funding.
According to regional center operator Boyd Campbell, ACFI understands that the "scope
of the HK Motors project is huge […] But we are moving forward because time doesn’t
stand still and HK Motors wants to build a fleet of next-generation motor vehicles using
next-generation ‘green’ technologies that are here today."
HK Motors is a Pasadena, California-based startup. It has yet to manufacture any cars, but
plans to produce up to 3 million hybrid cars per year in the United States. On display at a
press conference earlier this year was an Italian-designed concept car, the likes of which
HK would like to produce at the Alabama facility.
USCIS has approved the city of Lansing, Michigan as an EB-5 regional center. According
to a press release from the Lansing Economic Development Corporation (LEDC), Lansing
Mayor Virg Bernero claims the "coveted designation" will allow the city to "attract and
leverage foreign investment that will help grow the city's economy and create new jobs."
"This is another home run for our regional business community," said Tim Daman,
President and CEO of the LRCC. "Mayor Bernero and the Chamber share a vision of
transforming the Lansing region into an economic powerhouse with global reach. The EB-5
program is a perfect companion to our successful efforts to designate Capital Region
International Airport as a U.S. Customs Port of Entry and Foreign Trade Zone."
LEAP President and CEO Denyse Ferguson said the city's EB-5 status will make the
Lansing region an even more compelling location to start a new business. "When you add
together all of the tremendous assets that already make our region a great place to live and
work, the EB-5 Regional Center sends a strong signal to the rest of the world that Lansing,
Michigan is open for business," Ferguson said.
Whether the presence of a third regional center in Michigan – the EB-5 Michigan Regional
Center and International Michigan Investments Regional Center have already received
USCIS approval – will help spur the state's struggling economy is yet to be seen. Interest
in the EB-5 program has increased significantly this year, and competition on the regional
center playing field continues to increase.
Last month, the Victorville Regional Center in Southern California secured ten Chinese
investors for its project at a local airport.
Victorville's EB-5 funding will first go toward construction of a wastewater treatment facility
integral to the operation of a nearby Dr. Pepper/Snapple bottling plant and Plastipak
plastics facility. This is the cornerstone of larger efforts to fund development near the
airport. The city's goal is to raise $25 million through the EB-5 program by November, and
each investor is putting it closer toward achieving that goal.
On June 15, Johns will travel to Asia on another of several trips he has been making to
secure additional EB-5 investor capital for the city of Victorville. In addition to China, Johns
will pitch the project to prospective investors in other countries, including South Korea.
The state of Idaho is making an effort to secure investment dollars via the EB-5 visa
program, and many Chinese investors have already committed.
Earlier this month, Governor Butch Otter traveled across China pitching the Idaho State
Regional Center's cornerstone project--an existing gold mine in the Boise Basin near Idaho
City. The regional center and Westlink, its Chinese partner, have already secured 120
investors who will be pumping a total of $60 million into the project in exchange for U.S.
green cards.
According to Steve Wood of Oxyfresh, an Idaho company that sells dental, pet, and
healthcare products, "Every company we met wanted to do something with us." Oxyfresh
and several other Idaho companies were represented by Otter on his most recent China
visit.
The ambitious project would include retail, offices, boat docking and a hotel, with a rooftop
bar and pool. Harbourside is slated to rise at the northwest corner of Indiantown Road and
U.S. 1. Construction is expected to begin by the end of the year.
Normally, a project of this nature would obtain partial financing from banks. But with banks
continuing to fail at a record pace, and remaining ones forced to set aside capital for
souring loans, Harbourside's developer has had to be creative. So the developer is asking
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to approve the creation of an EB-5 center in
Jupiter.
Nick Mastroianni, who would become an operator at the regional center if it receives
USCIS approval, expects the project to create around 2,000 jobs.
The Palm Beach Development and Finance Center, the Palm Beach Post notes, is another
EB-5 regional center already operating in South Florida. It seeks to raise capital for projects
as diverse as solar technology, security systems for the military and government entities,
and home goods. While there is a lot of interest in the regional center, attorney Al Zucaro
acknowledges that it has not yet secured any investors.
EB-5 projects are most attractive, says Zucaro, when they are both real estate-based and
endorsed by local governments.
July
• Victorville Regional Center Receives "Notice of Intent to Terminate" From USCIS
• Immigration Attorney Critiques "Creative" Job Counting Methodologies
• Chinese Media Outlet Profiles the EB-5 Program
• EB5info.com Launches Russian Language Site
• EB5info.com Editor Note – Jose Latour's "Immigration Insider" Blog
There was a total of four projects, all of which are in question to some degree. USCIS sent
a letter to Victorville's attorney stating that at least three of the projects probably were not
viable, but that the regional center went on to promote the projects anyway. The first
project involved construction of a power plant, but the city defaulted on the equipment
needed to build it.
Although there is still much to learn about Victorville's troubles, it may be a couple of
months before the final word comes from USCIS. The city just sent several hundred pages
of documentation to the federal government in an attempt to make its case, and it is
awaiting a response.
Information about the regional center's troubles began leaking when Inland Energy, the
company that received a contract from the city to raise money for regional center projects,
fell short of the $25 million it pledged to raise by May of this year. So far, Victorville has only
received $3 million of that amount.
On behalf of Victorville Regional Center, attorney David Hirson sent this letter to Michael
Gibson of USAdvisors.org:
Dear Michael,
Of the four only one, the Victorville Wastewater Treatment Facility (VWTF) was
actually marketed to potential investors. The City of Victorville (City) and the
Southern California Logistics Airport Authority (SCLAA) have been extremely
conservative and set high standards to be met in handling their Regional Center
and in dealing with the investors. I have personally attended many meetings and
had discussions about the program with City Council members, City officials and
members of the board of SCLAA.
The other three projects were not immediately ready for receiving investment
money. The other projects are not proceeding at this time and are put on hold to
allow for an improvement in the economy. They are not ‘defunct’ but simply
delayed. Immediately upon receipt of the NIT all the web site was amended to
reflect this, thereby removing the main tangible cause for complaint by the USCIS.
The other issues were also puzzling. USCIS had approved an I-526 for an investor.
In that package as with all subsequent filings, business plans and econometric
reports were filed. The NIT challenges this while stating “…. Although a review of
the regional center proposal and three Form 1-526 petitions appears to indicate
that this project is a viable commercial venture, …..”. Subsequent to the NIT the
Adjustment of status for the first approved I-526 investor was also approved for the
investor and his family.
The RFE for another I-526 investor cases did not deal at all with the business plan
issue or the alleged missing econometrics report. Only issues relating to source of
funds and a date of birth clarification were raised. Based on my review of the
response to the NIT filed by the City, I am confident that this unwarranted “cloud”
will be removed very shortly.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that you may
have.
Thank you.
David
David Hirson, Partner,
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP.
Fragomen Consular Practice (FCP)
18401 Von Karman Avenue, 2nd Floor
Irvine CA 92612-1596
+1.949.660.3504 (Direct) +1.949.261-0209 (Main)
+1.949.279.2156 (Mobile) +1.949.261.2821 (Fax)
dhirson@fragomen.com http://www.fragomen.com
When I attended the EB-5 Stakeholders Meeting at the California Service Center (“CSC”) in
March 2010, a regional center principal asked a question something along the lines of:
In the venture capital (“VC”) world, out of ten projects, VC firms expect nine to fail and
maybe one will be the next Google. Since this is accepted business practice, can I count
jobs using this same approach? Meaning, if four of my regional center projects fail (which,
of course they won’t) and project five creates enough excess jobs to satisfy the job creation
requirements for the investors in projects one-four, will this work? Likewise, can an
investor’s money be divided among the five projects or must it all go to one project?
Having seen this pattern on a couple of occasions when representing individual investors
in their I-526 regional center petitions and having been met with various levels of denial
and resistance when I raised this issue with the regional center, I decided that I would seek
a reiteration of the definitive answer provided in March 2010. The July 28, 2010 CSC
Liaison Meeting was my chance, but this is where things get interesting…and even less
clear.
During the Q&A session of the July 28, 2010 CSC meeting, I asked the following
questions:
Let’s assume that I’m a prospective regional center investor. I want to invest in a regional
center with projects 1-5. Must my $500,000 be invested in one of these projects, such as
Project 1, or can my money be equally divided among Projects 1-5? Consequently, at the
I-829 stage, let’s say my funds went to Project 1, which fails to create jobs. If Project 2
creates excess jobs, can I utilize jobs created by Project 2 to lift my conditions?”
I expected to receive three quick “no’s” to these questions and that this would be the end
of the matter. Instead, I started getting a meandering, waffling response of “well, it
depends on whether the different projects are separate or related, subsidiaries, the
particulars of the project, yada, yada, yada. This waffling continued for a couple more
minutes before it was abruptly cut off under the guise that I was intentionally asking tricky
questions that were case-specific and otherwise trying to trick the CSC into making policy
in the field. Thus, it was all my fault and I should feel bad for committing some type of sin!
Nothing could be further from the truth. I was merely seeking reiteration of what had been
said in the past. Nevertheless, CSC did reveal that these questions were being considered
at USCIS headquarters for definitive guidance, the timetable for which was unclear.
Therefore, maybe some type of a more creative approach will be blessed as compliant at
some undefined point in the future under certain circumstances that have yet to be
determined. So what does one do in the meantime until this guidance is released,
remembering that USCIS spent eight years mulling over regulations to deal with the 800 or
so stalled EB-5 cases impacted by the 2002 amendments? After all, life must go on while
bureaucrats mull over the fate of the world.
Here are the lessons I believe should be drawn from these experiences:
If your project is solid, there is no need to reinvent the wheel and come up with a highly
creative approach to job counting. The project will create the requisite jobs. Creativity is
good for the art gallery, but it’s just inviting problems in the future in the regional center
context.
Creativity is good for the art gallery, but it really isn’t helping your regional center client in
the future. Perhaps you think you’re doing your regional center client a favor by blessing
the creative approach, but if the history of the EB-5 program tells us anything, it’s that a
“by-the-book” conservative approach wins the race. Don’t be afraid that advocating a
conservative approach will result in the prospective regional center taking their business
elsewhere. Telling a client what they want to hear may win the business, but it’s not good
practice.
Furthermore, creativity and envelope pushing is just exposing regional center investors and
their attorneys to a potential future of pain and disappointment. The I-829 denial that was
used as an example for the June 2010 EB-5 Stakeholders Meeting makes this point
crystal clear.
Bottom line to attorneys representing individual investors in regional centers:
If the regional center’s explanation is unsatisfactory, you may wish to have a serious
discussion with your client (within SEC guidelines, of course) about whether he or she
wants to proceed with an investment in that regional center. If the regional center fails or
something else happens that the investor finds unacceptable, you will get sued along with
the regional center if you failed to raise your concerns with the regional center or the client.
It’s just not worth the risk.
Conclusion:
While USCIS seems to waffle on whether a creative approach might be acceptable and
may waffle on the circumstances under which a creative approach might also be
acceptable, what is the point in finding out the hard way that a creative approach is not
compliant with the EB-5 program?
Again, I refer the reader to the I-829 denial featured in the June 2010 EB-5 Stakeholders
Meeting. Conservatism may have a bad name on Air America (which went bankrupt and
was quickly forgotten), but sometimes it may be a better approach to EB-5 practice. I
hope that this essay does not come off as too sanctimonious or as the random missives of
the naïve and unseasoned. However, nobody benefits from a return to the bad old days of
EB-5 practice that characterized the period from 1998 to 2006. Pushing the envelope too
far will get us back there faster than any of us can imagine.
China Daily Interviews Idaho Regional Center Operator, EB-5 Service
Provider Brian Su
The Idaho state government regards China as one of its major potential markets for the
program and has hired Chinese market specialists to help sell the state as an investment
destination.
Dickens made his third trip to China, bringing along Idaho governor C.L. “Butch” Otter to
promote the regional centers.
Idaho launched its first regional center in December last year and the second in January. It
has not had any success story yet out of the program. But the centers are still new and
hopes are still high.
China Daily also points out how emigrating to the United States is a "popular move"
among China's wealthy citizens, although moving to countries like Canada or Australia is
often a less tedious process. Despite the difficulties, it appears there is still an allure
particular to the United States that motivates Chinese people of means to bear any
hindrances inherent to the immigration process.
For clarification on Chinese interest in emigrating to the United States, China Daily
publishes commentary from EB-5 service provider Brian Su:
“The US is still a huge attraction to Chinese people and is always the first pick for the most
capable investors,” said Su. “And the EB-5 program can be a fast track to a US green
card.”
In major Chinese cities, such as Beijing, Shanghai and Hangzhou, wealthy Chinese
are
often invited to glamorous EB-5 promotions events, where high-level state officials greet
them. […]
Whether such an incentive pays of for Muroff is yet to be seen. Additional comments from
Dickens indicate that the majority of Chinese individuals interested in EB-5 are "not
sophisticated investors." They are, instead, "entrepreneurs who start private companies or
those who made their fortune from China’s real estate bubble."
Investors like these prefer to invest in "familiar industries," according to China Daily, like
"real estate and retail trade."
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has provided the following invitation:
Though greatly underutilized, the EB-5 immigrant visa may be the answer for clients who
lack other options as a result of our broken immigration system. This comprehensive one-
day program provides exceptional training in EB-5 investor law for practitioners at every
level.
The morning sessions are split into two tracks. Track I,
designed for the new EB-5 practitioner, will provide an
overview of the law, recommend a protocol for determining
whether EB-5 is an appropriate client strategy, and will
delve into the details of preparing and filing an EB-5 case.
Registration Information:
AILA Member: $475
AILA Member's Paralegal: $475
Nonprofit AILA Member: $325
AILA Law Student Member: $275
Government Rate: $475
CLE Credit:
This AILA conference has been filed for MCLE and specialized credit in appropriate jurisdictions.
Participants must designate the state(s) for notification on the registration form and sign the official
record of attendance for the state(s) on site. Number of credit hours awarded for each state will be
available at the conference. Eligible participants can receive up to 8.4 CLE credit hours.
EB5info.com now has a Russian counterpart with a ".ru" URL. To be exact, EB5visa.ru is
the address, and it's still a "young" site according to webmaster Igor Kasyanchuk, who is
responsible for its creation and maintenance.
When everything is set up,
says Kasyanchuk, the site will
be visible in Yandex, the
popular Russian-language
search engine, and should
include complete translations
of everything published on the
English site.
Of course, the purpose of a Russian-language site with information about the USCIS EB-5
visa program is to begin making news, events, and contact information for EB-5
practitioners more globally available. According to Kasyanchuk, the creation of EB5visa.ru
may, in the future, serve as a template for creating versions of the site in other languages.
Many an EB-5 attorney maintains a web presence, and in that regard Jose Latour is no
different. Unlike some reading material focused on immigration law, however, Latour's
"Immigration Insider" blog offers a perspective on investment immigration that is fresh and
colloquial.
Of interest to the EB-5 visa community are recommendations on how USCIS and the
Department of Commerce (DOC) could work together to improve the outreach of the EB-5
immigrant investor visa program to prospective EB-5 foreign national investors. The memo
is fascinating as the subject of a USCIS/DOC partnership to promote the EB-5 immigrant
investor visa program has been the subject of a number of stakeholder discussions. This is
the first time, however, that an actual plan has been put in writing and proposed to a large
audience.
Seeing that the memo addresses a potentially enormous legislative and national problem
should comprehensive immigration reform not occur this year, the fact that the EB-5
immigrant investor visa program even gets mentioned is big news for EB-5 investors,
practitioners, and stakeholders.
Partner with Department of Commerce (DOC) to administer the EB-5 Immigrant Investor
Visa Program
The paragraph mentions how the EB-5 immigrant investor visa program requires foreign
nationals who invest in the United States to create at least 10 jobs to obtain LPR status.
Then it states:
Due to a number of factors the EB-5 program has been underutilized and, as a result, job
creation under this program has been limited. USCIS views the EB-5 visa program as an
important tool in assisting the U.S. economy as our country continues to recover from the
recent recession.
Currently, an opportunity exists for USCIS and the DOC to work together in promoting the
EB-5 Visa Immigrant Investor Pilot Program (Pilot Program). The goals of the Pilot Program
and the goals of certain DOC components, such as Invest in America, seem to provide a
natural starting point for agency collaboration. OPS proposes setting up a working group
with the DCO to determine how DOC might assist USCIS in making the EB-5 program
more accessible to foreign investors through administrative efficiencies and promotion.
Incidentally, Otter's interest in EB-5 is due, in large part, to "Project 60," an effort "aimed at
increasing Idaho's gross domestic product to $60 billion," according to the Statesman.
The first time Idaho tried to start a regional center, it created the tech-focused InvestIdaho,
an undertaking that, in the words of Brian Dickens of the Idaho Department of Commerce,
"[isn't] going anywhere" due to the fact that the regional center is not located in a Targeted
Unemployment Area and cannot qualify for $500,000 EB-5 investments.
Idaho became interested in the gold mine project when Sima Muroff, Principal Manager for
Blackhawk on the River, learned of the potential that may lie in land recently acquired by
Don and Candy Miller, a wealthy Idaho couple. This from the Statesman:
In 2005, the Boise North End couple had bought a ghost town called Quartzburg, about
three miles outside of Placerville, with the idea of turning it into a recreation or
second-home development.
The Gold Hill Mine there was first opened in 1864 but has been abandoned since 1938.
At the sale closing, the previous owner told Don Miller he had some papers with
information about the property. Miller was presented with a garage full of documents - the
entire record of all mining and exploration at Quartzburg since 1863. The documents
offered a road map for geologists looking to reopen the mine.
"It would be worth $30 million to $40 million if you had to go out and collect it today," Don
Miller said.
He worked with the Colorado School of Mines to analyze the documents and the
information. The most remarkable find was that the piles of tailings sitting on the property
since the mine closed in 1938 weren't tailing at all.
Instead of a pile of waste, Miller was sitting on 180,000 tons of rich ore that had been
mined and left unprocessed. It is valued at more than $50 million, he said. Best of all, the
ore has few contaminants and has not leached heavy metals into the ground.
A mutual friend at the Cascade Bank in McCall referred the Millers to Muroff. He and his
partners bought into the Gold Hill Mine and it became the centerpiece of the Idaho
Regional Center's investment.
If Muroff and Governor Otter can reopen and exploit this mine with the
help of foreign investment capital, it will be a success story for the
EB-5 visa program, which, as the Statesman also notes, "has
produced mixed results."
With nearly 100 EB-5 regional centers operating and so few projects
actually getting off the ground relative to that number, a successful
gold mine in Idaho would certainly show that the EB-5 program can
work as it was intended and be a win-win situation for Americans and
foreign national investors.
Brunner, who is a former official in the city of D.C.'s National Capitalization Revitalization
Corporation, is heading up the project with her partner, immigration attorney David Morris
of the Visa Law Group.
The new D.C. development is receiving a $100 million loan from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, and Brunner says that the amount of funding to be
raised through the U.S. EB-5 immigrant investor program may ultimately match that figure.
Dubbed "CityMarket," the development is a 1-million square-foot plan that will take up a
two-block area between 7th and 9th streets and O and P streets. The first phase will
include 395 apartments, the Giant grocery store, and a hotel with nearly 200 rooms.
All told, the project is valued at $260 million, according to the Post.
When asked how the Chinese government feels about the USCIS EB-5 investment visa
program, EB-5 service provider Brian Su's response is simple and to the point: They don't
like it.
Although it's true that the Chinese State Council made a statement last month proclaiming
the government's respect for a "citizen's choice for immigration," Su notes, China's recent
request that all high-level officials and Communist Party leaders register their family
members living overseas belies the fact that it's not completely comfortable with such
emigration – in particular with foreign government incentives like the EB-5 visa program.
As for whether such a warning will discourage potential investors from investigating the
EB-5 visa program, Su isn't worried.
"People are still interested," he says. "I don't think there will be any significant impact on
the interest." But for regional centers "following the rules," he adds, "it's bad news."
Bad news or not, more EB-5 visas were issued to Chinese immigrant investors than to
those from any other country in 2009, and it's unlikely the government's fear of wealth
leaving the country will put a large damper on regional center marketing efforts or Chinese
interest in investment immigration any time soon.
EB-5 Program Breathes New Life Into Plan for Suburban Sports
Complex
The Sportsplex will be built in two phases and will cover 165 acres in McHenry County.
The Herald adds the following:
Given recent immigration debates, project developers and planners are quick to defend the
EB-5 program.
"Not many of the investors will live in McHenry County. They may live somewhere else in
the U.S.," Kameli said. "But their money creates jobs in McHenry County. That’s what
residents should care about."
Managing partner for the complex [Lou] Tenore said it was a way for potential new citizens
to speed their progress.
"It doesn’t guarantee citizenship," Tenore said. "They just don’t have to sit in line."
The Sportsplex initiative has also received permission to sell $18 million in recovery zone
bonds received through the federal stimulus package. That funding, along with EB-5, will
bring in money for the development without having to pay back debt to any banks.
September
• Regional Centers in Colorado, Montana, Washington, and Utah Make News
• Victorville Regional Center Receives Second Termination Notice from USCIS
• New EB-5 Visa Projects in Florida Focused on Mixed-Use Development
• New York Deal May Become the Most Expensive EB-5 Project on Record
Could Colorado be the next success story for the EB-5 visa program?
As Schwartz points out, however, only a handful of those regional centers appear to be
active, which may leave a larger opening for more serious newcomers eager to have the
EB-5 visa program fund new initiatives.
When it comes to whether the state of Colorado holds any particular appeal to the
immigrant investor, Schwartz is confident.
"We think there is some appeal to the international community," he says, noting that
"Colorado and the world-class ski areas" are not exactly unknown locales in other parts of
the world. Compared to some parts of the country, he adds, "Colorado has a little more
pizzaz."
As for selling investors on its proposed initiatives, the regional center is aware that alleged
instances of "over-marketing" EB-5 visa projects to foreign investors has the Chinese
government issuing warnings about the program. But Schwartz says he isn't worried.
"I'm not concerned about it," he says. "We're trying to find [sales] contacts who are honest
and straightforward."
Given the current high rate of unemployment, it may come as a surprise that finding a
Targeted Employment Area (TEA) in Colorado is easier said than done.
"The good news for Colorado is that the unemployment rate isn't as high as the national
average," says Schwartz. That's why the regional center received approval to take on EB-5
visa projects all throughout the state – in particular those rural areas with populations low
enough to qualify as TEA's.
"We're focusing a lot of attention on areas in the mountains," he says. "There is still some
zeal for development in the mountains."
If the Colorado Regional Center is successful in its attempts to use investment immigration
as a catalyst for new development initiatives in the Centennial State, it will join the relatively
small percentage of regional centers in the United States actively managing EB-5 visa
projects.
Metzler is referring to new jobs created at nearby industrial facilities that depend on the
wastewater treatment plant.
Dated September 1, Metzler's letter also states that the new notice "jeopardizes the ability
of the Southern California Logistics Airport Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility to
sustain jobs created as it prohibits the ability of the SCLA (wastewater treatment plant) to
refinance its construction debt."
USCIS does not appear so sympathetic, however. In its letter to Victorville, it asserts that
"neither the Dr. Pepper Snapple plant nor the Plastipak plant appear to have a relationship
with the wastewater treatment plant other than being parties to agreements to be
consumers of the services of the wastewater treatment plant […] It would appear that your
regional center asserts that any newly created public or private entity that provides a
commodity or service to commercial consumers, such as a wastewater treatment plant,
power plant, solid waste disposal center, etc., would in effect be able to claim credit for the
jobs created by the commercial consumers of its services."
Regional center operators, however, seem confident in their assertions that the regional
center has nothing to fear.
William Buck Johns of Inland Energy, the developer awarded the contract to seek out
immigrant investors, tells the Sun they're "expecting the green light from USCIS any day
now." The article goes on:
Johns said other companies planning a move to the SCLA and create jobs will be utilizing
the wastewater treatment as well. In addition, the Victorville Federal Prison will also be a
user of the plant.
Johns said the regional center is still actively marketing the EB-5 program to investors, but
said it is dire that the matter be cleared up with the federal government.
“It’s just a clear misunderstanding by the USCIS. We’re well within the bounds of the
program, and this is one of the more successful EB-5 programs in the country.”
With so many new EB-5 regional centers opening their doors, seeing one in danger of
having to shut them is certainly an anomaly. If USCIS and Victorville cannot come to an
agreement, 28 committed investors are likely to lose their chance for a green card.
EB-5 in Montana? The Governor Says Yes.
The governor was meeting with ALPS CEO Robert Minto, who
updated him on plans to open a regional center in Big Sky Country. According to the
KAJ18 television channel, he "hopes to have the first projects funded by late 2011 or early
2012."
American Life Inc. began funding development projects in the SODO district in 1996 and
became eligible for immigrant investor funding ten years later with the formation of
American Life Ventures. The group now oversees 10 USCIS-approved regional centers
participating in the EB-5 visa program.
Utah's Mountain States Regional Center Focused on the Hospitality
Industry
Approved August 11, Mountain States Regional Center is the first to appear in the state of
Utah.
But it also is authorized to pursue foreign investments that could be used in Utah and other
parts of the West in fields as varied as horse ranch development, high technology,
healthcare services and innovation, entertainment, education and infrastructure.
Without providing details, Westfall said “we have several projects around the state that are
in the pipeline. We anticipate having all of the funds put together for our first project in 60
days.” He added that center officials have been in discussions with investors in China, the
Middle East, Japan, Russia and several other countries.
If Westfall is trying to get foreign investors to fund Marriott-branded properties, he will join a
fairly large group of EB-5 regional centers seeking funds for new hotels and other
development initiatives in the hospitality industry.
“The United States gets about 1 million immigrants a year. EB-5 is open to 10,000 a year,
who are high net-worth individuals, generally well-educated with no criminal record,” said
immigration lawyer Larry Behar of Fort Lauderdale. “Is that the kind of immigration we
want? You’re darn right.”
Behar has developed a specialized EB-5 unit with a staff of eight who do legal work for
proposed regional centers, help market the approved centers and help foreign investors
obtain the visas.
He recently returned from a trip to China with the governor of Idaho to tout mining ventures
in Idaho approved as an EB-5 regional center. And he’s now seeking approval for what
would be the largest EB-5 regional center nationwide: a $250 million cancer treatment
hospital in Brooklyn, N.Y.
"Some EB-5 investors worry if they’ll meet employment requirements," he tells the paper.
"But a hotel creates jobs immediately, and we've found some investors are more
comfortable when government is involved."
Miami Herald Takes a Look at Possible Florida EB-5 Project
The Miami Herald ran a story this month about the Great Southern Hotel, which it
contends was once "a landmark of Hollywood's [Hollywood, FL] Young Circle." It seems
that the hotel has sat idle for some time but is now about to get a "$100,000 face-lift."
Raelin Story, spokeswoman for the city of Hollywood, tells the Herald that "the project is a
compromise between the owner and the city to clean up decaying property - at least what
the public can see - while it sits empty awaiting redevelopment.
The regional center’s EB-5 visa project is located in a TEA and is stated to be worth $144
million, $80 million of which it plans to receive from immigrant investor visa funding. The
center’s marketing material states that the project should create 400 more jobs than
required.
Nicholas Mastroianni II, President of Allied Capital & Development of South Florida, LLC
and new managing principal at the regional center has experience in the real estate and
development market, and past projects have included subdivisions, town home
developments, commercial facilities, and mixed use sites. USCIS approval of the Florida
Regional Center brings the total number of EB-5 regional centers in Florida to 15.
Nicholas A. Mastroianni II, Manager, Florida Regional Center, said, “Not only is this a major
milestone for the Florida Regional Center and Harbourside Place, but it is a life raft for Palm
Beach County and the Town of Jupiter; the economic stimulus this will bring to the area is a
necessity. We have been promoting this project for months and we can now begin to file
I-526 applications for interested foreign investors.”Harbourside Place features an
entertainment plaza and outdoor amphitheatre, retail space, restaurants and eateries, office
sites, 4-star hotel accommodations and marina. This full-scale development encompasses
a thrilling range of opportunities for business, visitors and residents.
Each year, the U.S. government reserves 3,000 green cards for foreign investors who invest
in designated regional centers through the EB-5 Visa Program. These initiatives enjoy full
government support as they stimulate the economy, generate at least ten jobs per
investment, and promote community development while providing direct access to green
cards for foreign investors and their families.
The Florida Regional Center will bring the benefits of the EB-5 Visa Program to the
business community of Palm Beach County. Regional center projects must be approved by
the U.S. government and the main criteria is that each investor’s contribution will create ten
sustainable jobs for U.S. workers in a designated geographical region.
For more information on Harbourside Place and other Florida Regional Center projects, visit
www.FLRegionalCenter.com or email us at info@FLRegionalCenter.com.
New York Project May Raise Largest Figure on Record for EB-5
Although Ratner is only seeking about $250 million of that amount through the EB-5
funding element, that figure would still be among the largest amounts ever raised through
the immigrant investor green card program – possibly the largest.
It also seems Ratner received some guidance from New York City officials who, impressed
by the successful Brooklyn Navy Yard project being handled by the New York City Regional
Center, have urged Ratner to use the EB-5 visa program as a source of financing for his
own ventures.
It remains to be seen whether Ratner's trip to China or any subsequent efforts to exploit
the EB-5 program for his Atlantic Yards project will culminate in the largest figure ever
raised by the program for a single initiative. The plans, however, are ambitious. The Journal
is also reporting that construction of 16 residential towers – also part of Atlantic Yards – is
planned for next year.
The New York City Regional Center does have a hand in the project as "sponsor," the
paper states, but the Atlantic Yards project still needs approval from the federal
government before it can use any of the $250 million it is able to raise through the
program.
October
• USCIS Shuts Down Victorville Regional Center
• USAdvisors.org Forges Partnership With Chinese Media Company
• Atlantic Yards Project a Hit With Chinese Investors
• Chinese Public Security Bureau Issues Warning About EB-5 Investments
• Northern California Regional Center Principals Comment on the Dairy Industry, China
• Gold Coast Regional Center Operator Speaks With EB5info.com
• Former DNC Chairman to Use EB-5 Funding for Mississippi Project
For the first time ever, USCIS has shut down an operational
EB-5 regional center.
Other EB-5 visa projects in Victorville's pipeline also caused skepticism among USCIS
officials, most notably the construction of a power plant for which the city of Victorville
defaulted on needed equipment costs and a railroad project that never came to fruition.
In August, the regional center received a second termination notice calling into question
the jobs it was counting toward totals needed to satisfy the USCIS requirement that 10
jobs be created per green card issued. It seems the regional center attempted to include
jobs created at the bottling facility among its totals since the plant was a consumer of the
service provided by the wastewater treatment utility – methodology ultimately deemed
faulty by USCIS.
It would appear that your regional center asserts that any newly created public or private
entity that provides a commodity or service to commercial consumers, such as a
wastewater treatment plant, power plant, solid waste disposal center, etc., would in effect
be able to claim credit for the jobs created by the commercial consumers of its services.
Victorville's Response
In light of continued requests that Victorville demonstrate it was able to raise money for its
EB-5 visa projects according to criteria approved by USCIS, city spokeswoman Mariana
Gitmore told the Victorville Daily Press Tuesday that the regional center was unable to do
so.
Speaking on behalf of the regional center, attorney David Hirson (pictured) sent the
following statement to EB5info.com:
That the 28 investors who have already agreed to invest in Victorville's projects are eagerly
awaiting any news of the regional center's appeal goes without saying.
Miami, November 22-26, 1633 North Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33132,
Marriott Biscayne Bay Hotel
Los Angeles, December 9-10, 333 South Figueroa Street, Los Angeles,
California 90071, Los Angeles Downtown Marriott
New York City developer Forest City Ratner (FCR) has been very active in China during the
month of October.
According to EB-5 service provider Brian Su, FCR's project, which is being handled by the
New York City Regional Center (NYCRC), "presents a lot of pressure and challenges to
other EB-5 projects that are currently being marketed in China" largely due to the star
power of its unlikely promoters.
Officials from the New York City Regional Centre (NYCRC) are touring China to drum up
498 investors with the aim of contributing $249m to the city’s biggest property project
outside Ground Zero.
Some have criticized the New York project, suggesting that its use of EB-5 is merely an
excuse to exploit low-interest financing for a portion of the project the developer could
have afforded anyway. Others emphasize that the Nets stadium itself has already received
full funding.
Whatever the case, the presence of American basketball stars in Beijing definitely helps
FCR's project stand out. A seminar held in Beijing's Minzu Hotel brought over 200
prospective investors, a large number of whom signed up "on the spot" to invest in the
project. The roadshow, which includes 9 dates, will continue through November 5.
As many EB-5 practitioners are already aware, the Chinese government has issued
warnings to potential EB-5 investors about risks associated with the program. The
following document is an English translation from the Chinese-language news site, SINA
net:
The EB-5 Program was first introduced to China at the end of 2005. With increasing trade
between China and the US, more and more Chinese entrepreneurs need the green card to
go to the US for business purposes, expanding their business in the US, as well as
sending their kids to study in US. The EB-5 Investment Immigration Program has been
expanded since 2007. LiJuan Zhou, CEO of the overseas branch of HONGHAI, said that
there are now way more Chinese EB-5 applicants than Korean applicants according to the
latest statistic report from OCT – 2008 to Sept, 2009 – by USCIS. 1795 Chinese from
mainland China applied for EB-5 besides 142 Chinese from Taiwan. Sheng Liu, General
Manager of the US Project Division of Fei Yang Group, said that USCIS issued more than
1800 green cards to investors in 2009, almost double those issued in 2008. Chinese
applicants obtained one fifth of the total green cards, a little bit less than Korean
applicants, but the number of Chinese investors who applied for the green card is
increasing the most.
The EB-5 marketing promotion in China also expanded rapidly. For example, in 2005,
there was only one EB-5 project being promoted in Guang Zhou. At the end of 2009,
however, there were more than 20 EB-5 projects introduced with different scales – some
projects are big and some are small, such as a restaurant project.
Senior Immigration Consultant of GuoFeng LLC, ShaoHeng Lin, indicates the reason why
the EB-5 program has gained popularity among the immigration agencies and investors in
the last two years is the EB-5 “ Flexible Immigration Requirement.”
The EB-5 “Flexible Immigration Requirement” gives you the flexibility to do what you want
in the USA: No degree requirement, any age, and no entrepreneur experience requirement.
Any person who reaches 21 years old and shows a source of $500,000 legally (business
income, stock gain, house sale, house loan, gifts, etc.) can apply.
In Canton, A lot of people can easily meet the EB-5 requirement. For instance, a kid who
wants to study in US, as long as he is 21 years old and has a $500,000 investment fund
from his parents can apply for it and come back to China with a green card after
graduation.
The whole family can get the green card if one of the households applies for EB-5.
For many Chinese individuals and families, it's an easy and fast way to get a green card.
It’s also very attractive to the immigration agency. They can turn around cash in a much
shorter time since the EB-5 program process only takes about 3-8 months.
Risks: “Investment Fund” and “Green Card” are two major risks
However, recently the Ministry of Public Security has warned potential immigration
applicants that EB-5 projects promoted by some of the immigration agencies belong to
private equity activity and have huge risks.
YouWen Zhen, General Manager of GuoHeLi investment consulting LLC in Shen Zheng,
pointed out two huge risks:
First, Investing Fund Risk: The investors need to fund the project first before getting the
visa, and EB-5 projects are not financially guaranteed by the US government; the investing
fund cannot be withdrawn within 5 years. The investment must be truly at risk. From the
EB-5 procedure, the applicants must fund $500,000, a huge amount once they start to
apply through the agency. While Canada's investor immigration funding is backed up by
the Canadian government, USCIS asks all regional centers to clearly state in their contract
with EB-5 investors that EB-5 investments must be “at risk” and there can be no mention
of redemption rights or guarantees. However, some of the immigration agencies and
American personnel ignore this rule and promote EB-5 illegally, as private equity.
Second, Green Card Risk: The EB-5 applicants cannot control and manage the investing
process themselves. If the investment fails and does not create 10 jobs in two years, their
green card will be canceled. At the beginning, the applicants and family only get a
“conditional green card." There is a long way to go to get the permanent green card; in
case the investment fails, they not only lose the green card, but also the investment fund.
In China, there are EB-5 investors who got “conditional green cards," but as for today,
none of them have successfully changed to I-829. We encourage people to do their own
due diligence, especially studying the mutual fund companies who actually run the EB-5
projects before they choose to invest in the project.
Yahoo! Finance Profiles Current State of EB-5 Program
In a column this month, Yahoo! Finance Economics Editor Daniel Gross provided a brief
profile of the EB-5 visa program, noting that if the program were "fully utilized, it would
bring at least $7 billion annually and create or preserve 100,000 jobs per year."
As millionaires are "being minted by the millions" abroad, Gross notes, U.S. companies are
themselves investing elsewhere. He sees EB-5 as a way for the United States to make up
for those investment dollars that are traveling to places far away and not stirring the
cauldron of economic activity at home. Making brief mention of developer Bruce Ratner
and the New York City Regional Center's "controversial" Atlantic Yards project recently
profiled by the Wall Street Journal, Gross's piece also summarizes how the program may
be used as a source of funding for existing initiatives for which American investors are not
likely to be found.
If Gross's observation that EB-5 is still producing "lackluster numbers" that are nowhere
close to the 10,000 visas USCIS is able to issue each year really can be, as he contends,
"chalked up to a failure of marketing," then perhaps this year's explosive growth in the
number of regional centers will begin bringing more immigrant investor dollars to U.S.
shores.
Last year, the number of EB-5 visa approvals was just shy of 1,000. Considering the level
of marketing and competition in many countries – China, in particular – Gross may be
content to learn there's a good chance that number will increase.
The EB-5 Visa, Canada, and High Quality Protein – Reflections on the
Northern California Regional Center's Trip to China
by Stephen Weststeyn, Northern California Regional Center
We at Northern California Regional Center traveled to China last month to seek out
investment for our current EB-5 project, Weststeyn Dairy Farms. As there are many
investors coming to the U.S. from China, we decided to travel there and spend some time
informing people of our current project. We traveled to many cities in China, including
Beijing and Shanghai, and it was quite the experience.
The timing of our trip could not have been
better, noting the changes in the Canadian
immigration program that have made the
U.S. EB-5 program much more desirable
to foreign immigrant investors.
Traditionally, the Canadian immigration
program has outperformed the United
States EB-5 program quite substantially,
and there have been far more Chinese
emigrants going to Canada through its
immigration program than have gone to
the United States. However, Canada has
changed its immigration-by-investment
Beijing, China program, and Chinese emigrants see the
United States as a much better deal. This
recent change in the Canadian
immigration program provided our regional center with the most optimal timing for its
China trip.
Also when we were in China, we learned that California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
was going to be in Shanghai talking about the United States EB-5 program. The star
power of Arnold made for very responsive enthusiasm about California EB-5 projects.
The Chinese economy is growing very rapidly, and you could feel that there was a wealth
of opportunity to be had in China. Every city we visited confirmed this feeling. One thing we
noted when visiting is that there is a need for high-quality protein food sources. The
traditional Chinese meal is very low in protein. The Chinese demand for high-quality protein
sources will be a huge driver of growth in the global marketplace.
With over 1.5 billion people to feed, China will need to source food products from all over
the world in order to feed its populace. In the dairy industry, the Chinese have been one of
the largest driving forces of global demand. Rabobank, a large international agriculture
bank, has recently cited milk demand growth to quickly outpace supply over the next
decade, leaving tremendous opportunity for the dairy industry in the United States.
There is a great potential in the United States, especially California, to help China quench
its thirst for dairy products. California has been the United States' leader in dairy with
higher milk production than any other state, and it has some of the most efficient dairy
operations in the world. Northern California Regional Center is proud to offer investors the
opportunity to invest in a project that will essentially be helping feed the world
Our trip to China was not only an opportunity to inform potential investors of our project
thanks to the changing Canadian immigration program and the California governor's visit,
but it also provided a chance to see how successful our EB-5 project could be in the
coming decade with China’s growing demand for high-quality food sources.
If you ask Chip Abele, using the EB-5 visa program to fund new development projects is
little more than a "different twist" on what he has been doing for years.
"We're putting $30 million of our own funds into the deal," says the Chairman of Gold
Coast Florida Regional Center. "Every one of our dollars" is headed in the same direction
as any immigrant investor capital.
Gold Coast received USCIS approval in May of this year and was quick to publicize its first
project. While some claims, in particular the notion that Hollywood Circle will bring 18,000
jobs to South Florida in the next five years, have led to a raised eyebrow or two among
some EB-5 visa practitioners, Abele is confident that Hollywood Circle is a solid investor
green card opportunity.
"We were very bullish on the EB-5 program, and we're very bullish on structuring an
investment opportunity that we'll present to clients and investors. We have offices in South
Africa that have been there 20 years," he says, also adding that for players in the "South
Florida real estate market, doing business in Latin America is what you do."
And an already-established global presence – one that now includes Hong Kong and
Venezuela in addition to South Africa – is one way Abele hopes Gold Coast will distinguish
itself from the growing multitude of EB-5 regional centers, though he admits he and his
partners have almost no experience in European or Asian markets.
"We're taking in more than a million dollars a year from state and local government," he
says. "We've got state-subsidized funding. We've got Publix."
After initially forming the Broward County Regional Center, the group quickly decided to
expand its request beyond the single-county area.
Projects to Come?
As for any additional EB-5 visa projects in Gold Coast's future, Abele is willing to discuss
the Great Southern Hotel redevelopment recently profiled by the Miami Herald, though he
says it's merely in the center's pipeline.
"It is not a project for the regional center currently," he says. "I have not submitted it or run
the economic model on it."
For now, it seems Hollywood Circle is Gold Coast's primary EB-5 item. Whether that
project ultimately stands out against the veritable flood of mixed-use residential-retail
facilities being marketed to EB-5 visa investors, however, remains to be seen.
Big Political Name Uses EB-5 Funds for Electric Car Project
Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe made news this month
when he and former President Bill Clinton made a public appearance in Times Square to
show off McAuliffe's latest project: an electric car
that will be built in the United States.
The cars will be assembled by Greentech Automotive, which McAuliffe founded last year.
In addition to a plant Greentech plans to build in Tunica, Mississippi, McAuliffe is looking to
purchase land in both Tennessee and Virginia.
He expects the MyCar to go on sale mid-2011, after it’s modified to meet U.S. regulations
and upsized for American consumers. The first 100,000 [cars] will sell for $10,000, with
federal and state tax credits knocking the price down to around $8,500, he says.
Three more hybrid cars are planned for as early as 2013: a sports car, a mid-sized vehicle
and a subcompact. He won’t disclose his backers, saying only that they are “strategic
investors active in the green technology area.
Bloomberg goes on to describe the amount of money McAuliffe is raising through EB-5 as
"infinitesimal" compared to the millions he will need to get this project off the ground.
Some commentators believe McAuliffe's motivation may be, in part, political. After an
unsuccessful run for the Virginia gubernatorial nomination in 2009, some view McAullife's
latest venture as an attempt to show he can bring jobs to Virginia – a move that would give
him considerable bragging rights among contenders in any future political contest.
EB-5 Reform? Startup Act in the News Again
An article in news blog Business Daily takes a look not only at the EB-5 visa immigrant
investor program in its current form, but also the new Start-Up Visa Act introduced earlier
this year by Senators Kerry (D-MA) and Lugar (R-IN). As many EB-5 practitioners are
already aware, were the bill to ultimately pass and be signed into law, it would re-allocate a
number of the 10,000 EB-5 visas available for issue each year to a new category – the
EB-6 visa.
The main purpose of the bill is reform of the EB-5 program, and it
includes measures also called for by the Employment Benefit Act, a
House bill introduced last December by Representative Jared Polis
(D-CO).
These "qualified super-angel investors" would have to meet certain requirements set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to participate, a rule favored
by attorney Angelo Paparelli, who Business Daily quotes in the article.
Any qualified venture capital firm must be based in the United States and have been in
business for at least two years. Partners must be U.S. citizens and the firm must have
made investments in the recent past.
"Immigrant entrepreneurs" who have employed at least five employees after two years or
have acquired capital assets worth $1 million will receive green cards.
While the news blog seems to make no bones about the potential of a bill that includes
EB-5 reform and provisions for an EB-6 visa – the article headline is "Change in start-up
visa law sure way to lure investment" – it also states that such a bill is unlikely to come
before Congress again until sometime next year.
It's worth noting that passage of this law would almost certainly cross into territory
occupied by the politics of immigration. As Business Daily notes, "[Lawmakers] who tout
this bill emphasize the job-creation aspect rather than the political hot potato of
immigration reform."
November
• EB-5 Project to Create Jobs in Chicago Suburb
• New Colorado Regional Center Pioneers Historic Restoration, Biofuel Initiatives
• Washington D.C. EB-5 Project Breaks Ground
• USAdvisors.org Adds Dates and Locations to its Chinese TV Filming Schedule
• Chinese IPO Market Growing at an Extraordinary Rate in 2010
• Canadian Immigration Program Implements Tougher Criteria
• Attorney Essay: In Defense of the EB-5 Program
McHenry County, Illinois EB-5 Regional Center to Create Jobs for the
Community
by Michael Gibson, USAdvisors.org
“The investor wants to come to the United States for a better future for their children and
grandchildren,” said Kameli, who secures most of his foreign investors through an office in
Dubai. “The local governments are happy because you’re bringing all that sales tax and
property tax revenue to them. The U.S. government is happy because you’re creating
jobs.”
Kameli has been a strong advocate for federal scrutiny for EB-5 visa regional centers.
While much of the local opposition has deemed the project not viable, Kameli is certain
that his region needs these jobs to stimulate the economy. He has plans for other
developments in the region for which he has been soliciting tens of millions of dollars
during numerous trips to Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
One plan is to build a string of “memory care” centers for Alzheimer's patients in Aurora,
Elgin and Wood Dale, Illinois. Other ideas include a manufacturing plant in Rockford, a
water park in Wisconsin, and coffee shops and restaurants throughout the region, he said.
He has eased investors’ concerns by structuring the EB-5 visa financing so the money
would serve as a loan, with the farmland and whatever is built on it serving as collateral.
Regional center operators are bringing the EB-5 visa program to a town once home to one
of America's highly-canonized folk heroes.
Leadville, Colorado, in addition to having the highest altitude of any incorporated U.S. city,
was also where famed gambler and gunslinger Doc Holliday took up residence after his
participation in the O.K. Corral. Now this former mining boomtown may be getting a
makeover, and immigrant investor dollars may help foot the bill.
According to Jeff Edwards of the Colorado
Intercontinental Regional Center (“CIRC”),
which is handling the Leadville project, "our
vision is to take historic buildings in
downtown Leadville dating back to the late
1800s" and spend EB-5 money "renovating
them and bringing them back to life for real
estate and technology-driven businesses." If
all goes according to plan, those businesses
will use the historic commercial property as
office space.
A Change of Plans
In 2008, Edwards learned his colleague Steve Smith had purchased about 700 acres of
land in Leadville and had plans to build a community of 1,000 homes. The goal was to
create affordable housing for people who worked in the nearby resort communities, but
could not afford to live there.
In order to "create potential for EB-5," Edwards explains, they decided to capitalize on a
problem in the area, the Beetle Kill Plague, which has wrought havoc upon local forestland
and made it necessary to clear many nearby sites. The investor visa program would fund a
"labor-intensive" tree harvesting and construction apparatus using downed timber for
home construction. The name of the "program" would be Timber to Homes, and it would
create the new "Village of AltaColorado."
But that project, which was the basis for CIRC's December 2009 regional center
designation, was developed prior to the collapse in the housing market. In 2010, Leadville
and the surrounding area’s economy "will not support a growing population," Edwards
acknowledges. Even so, he and Smith still believe commercial real estate is viable, and
both are "in the process" of setting up the downtown Leadville renovation project. With an
increase in local employment driven by new businesses occupying the renovated office
space coupled with the nearby anticipated reopening of one of the largest molybdenum
mines in North America, Edwards and Smith are confident that the need for local housing
will increase, bringing the Village of AltaColorado closer to realization.
"We've had discussions with multiple marketing entities with a presence in China,"
Edwards says, "and they are anxious to market our projects in China.”
If all goes according to plan, Chinese and other international investors will soon be hearing
about the small town of Leadville, its historic properties, and the commercial restoration
initiative.
Timber to Fuel?
Just as the regional center has re-defined its real estate efforts with shifts in economic
realities, Edwards and Smith have had to alter the focus of their Timber to Homes project.
As construction of new homes may no longer be a workable use of the EB-5 visa program,
the regional center sees an opening in the market for ethanol, which the federal
government has mandated must compose a larger percentage of the nation's fuel supply
each year.
Instead of using downed timber for home construction, Edwards explains, it will be used to
produce cellulosic biofuel. Trees cut down in the mountains of Colorado will be transported
by truck or rail to cellulosic ethanol plants to be constructed either in Colorado or
elsewhere in the US. One such plant, partially funded by the US Department of Energy and
provided with loan guarantees by the Department of Agriculture, is located in Soperton,
Georgia, and CIRC is already in discussion with that facility on potential feedstock
collaboration. At these plants, cellulosic biomass will be converted into ethanol, which can
then be added to the nation's fuel supply and help satisfy federal ethanol requirements.
According to Edwards, "There isn't a single US plant operating today that's producing
[cellulosic biofuel] on a commercial scale," and the nation has not even approached the
number of gallons the government has mandated be part of the fuel supply by 2011. He
feels the current lack of supply versus federal government requirements will ensure
ongoing demand for biofuels.
Of course, everything from the logging itself to the biofuel processing element will be part
of what Edwards terms a "labor intensive" EB-5 investment project that should satisfy
USCIS job creation requirements.
"We're hoping to have a project in front of investors by first quarter 2011," he says.
EB-5 Capital Issues Press Release on Marriott Hotel Project
With projected completion of all three in Spring 2014, the $520 million, 14-story Marriott
Marquis will complement the city’s Convention Center that opened in 2003. The Marquis
will bring over 1200 direct jobs to the City. It will be the largest hotel in Washington with
1,175-rooms, 100,000 s.f. of function space and 53,000 s.f. of meeting space and will
enable the city to compete and capture revenue previously lost to Prince George County’s
2,000-room Gaylord hotel. The Courtyard and the Residence Inn locations will bring an
additional 500 rooms to the Marriott Convention Center complex.
Hometown hotel giant, Marriott, will manage the four-star hotel, which upon completion,
will be the third Marriott Marquis property in the world and the first Marquis development in
over 25 years.
“Not only is EB-5 Capital bringing much needed capital to projects throughout the District,
it is putting its resources to work in projects that will deliver real job opportunities for our
residents,” said Neil O. Albert, City Administrator of the District of Columbia. “EB5 Capital’s
investment in this project is an incredible endorsement of strength of our hospitality
industry.”
The Marriott complex gives the city the unparalleled ability to strengthen its convention and
tourism industry, which is just second to the federal government,” adds Ms. Brunner,
Managing Director for EB-5 Capital. “This project, along with the DC regional center’s
Roadside Development’s project, the City Market at O Street, is another success story of
EB-5 creating partnerships with international clients who are making a substantial
contribution to the United States economy.”
For more information about the Marriott Marquis, Capstone Development, City Market at
O, or EB-5 investment opportunities, please contact Angel Brunner:
(angel@eb5capital.com) or visit www.eb5capital.com. for additional information.
Orlando, December 13-17, 8701 World Center Drive, Marriott World Orlando
According to a recent entry on The Beacon, the official blog of USCIS, an October article in
the Chinese-language Epoch Times provides an overview of the EB-5 visa program that
addresses specific questions about investor-regional center logistics. Information for the
article was submitted directly by USCIS as part of "an ongoing series addressing general
immigration questions posed by [Epoch Times] readers."
Most of what USCIS shares is basic. Immigrant investor questions like "What is the most
common way to obtain an EB-5 visa?" and "How long does it take for me to immigrate
after applying for an EB-5 visa?" crop up in the article.
Although the target audience appears to be Chinese investors who have heard about EB-5
and are still in a very early investigation phase, other questions address possible concerns
of more serious would-be investors.
"I want to invest $500,000.00 in an area, but there is no regional center there. How long
does it take for a regional center to be established in mid-America?" is one question
USCIS answers for the Epoch Times, and its response details establishment of a regional
center, approval of a business plan, and the use of said business plan in determining
"market conditions, project costs, and activity timelines."
Definitions for Forms I-526, I-829, and the new I-924 are also provided.
By comparison, the Shanghai Stock Exchange ranked fourth for the largest IPO market
during the same time frame with 11 firms raising $8.2 billion.
It's likely that the sudden surge in IPO's was due to the October 2009 debut of the 创业
板, or Chinext, subsidiary board, which helps smaller companies access capital markets.
Chinext makes it possible for Chinese companies without any kind of state ownership to
provide public offerings.
As of July 2010, there are 57 companies with IPO's on Chinext, the total market value of
which makes up about 5.5% of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
The total number of domestic IPO's on the Shanghai Stock Exchange will likely eclipse
Shenzhen by the end of 2010, but the shift in growth is still worth mentioning. As China
Private Equity author Peter Fuhrman, who is also Chairman and CEO at China First
Capital, notes, "the locus of the world’s IPO activity is shifting to China."
EB-5 visa practitioners would be well served to stay aware of domestic capital investment
activity in China and consider how the impact of such investment – not to mention the
general increase in Chinese domestic wealth – will impact their efforts to secure immigrant
investor dollars for projects in the U.S.
To underscore just how strongly Corporate America supports such a bill, Ferrell quotes
Ernst and Young CEO Jim Turley, who is also serving on President Obama's National
Export Council: "Whenever there’s a student from anywhere in the world who is walking
across the stage from a leading university getting his or her PhD or masters we should
staple a visa there to him or her and say you’re welcome to stay."
Writing for Slate magazine, Jill Priluck says the Startup Visa Act "can't come soon
enough." Priluck also notes how "British Prime Minister David Cameron just established a
new 'entrepreneur visa' for foreign founders with investment commitments from leading
investors" in spite of "a pending immigration cap" in the United Kingdom. Such a move
indicates that other Western nations are already capitalizing on the prospect of luring
innovation from overseas by putting entrepreneurs on a fast track to citizenship.
Both publications also note how the EB-5 visa, in particular, is currently underutilized due
to the greater risk involved in obtaining one. Participants must invest in a U.S. business
and place their faith in projects that may or may not create 10 jobs and allow them to
obtain permanent residency. In the process of obtaining the visa, the investor takes on a
good deal of risk.
While the H1B, E-1, and E-2 visas are options for some skilled workers who want to reside
in the United States, Priluck explains, these visas are only temporary. Quoting Stephen
Yale-Loehr of Miller Mayer, "We don't have a true startup visa on the green-card side of the
immigration equation."
As the current lame duck Congress is unlikely to pick up on the Startup Visa Act or other
immigration legislation not passed this year, it will probably be some time before a new
entrepreneur visa becomes a reality.
According to the release, "Canada’s old immigrant investor criteria were the lowest when
compared to other countries with similar programs. The new criteria now align it more
closely with other immigrant-receiving countries."
The closest one comes to an investor visa program similar to Canada's is the US EB-5
visa program, which requires a minimum $500,000 investment in a US business. While the
US program has never hit the maximum number of investor green cards it's permitted to
issue in a given year, the Canadian program had to take a hiatus last summer when "the
volume of applications submitted under the Program had grown exponentially and
processing times had increased," according to the government release.
As the new criteria set forth by the Canadian government clearly reduce the number of
prospective applicants to its foreign investment program, application volume will likely
diminish as well. Whether doing so will actually increase the number of individuals applying
for the EB-5 investor green card, however, remains to be seen. The EB-5 visa program
attracts investors who may or may not also have an interest in moving to Canada.
Sometimes the desire to reside in one place over another supersedes dollar figures,
especially for those individuals with the means to participate in either program.
"These changes were necessary," said Jason Kinney, Canada's Minister of Citizenship,
Immigration and Multiculturalism. "The requirements had not been increased in more than
a decade and we need to keep pace with the changing economy."
Applications from earlier this year that still have not been processed will continue being
considered alongside new ones subject to Canada's most recent criteria.
Valid criticism is helpful. Attorneys in the EB-5 bar have offered passionate, well-reasoned
critiques of USCIS’ administration of the EB-5 program. The goal has been to inform
USCIS of the harmful effects of some of its interpretations, unfounded in the law. So the
larger goal of what I’d call “valid criticism” is to improve the EB-5 program by bringing
clarity and predictability, consistent with the law and regulations.
In contrast, the individual I have in mind criticizes the general EB-5 program as a way to
deter a particular project. Not surprisingly, many things he has said about the program are
false. These false and ill-informed statements, however, have a real impact. They taint the
public’s perception of the EB-5 program, which the federal government reported as
bringing an estimated $1 billion into the U.S. economy back in 2005.
They paint USCIS as lax guardians of immigration, when more astute observers have
criticized the Service for its undue and arguably unlawful restrictions of the EB-5 program.
They undermine investors’ confidence in the program, deterring capital and job creation in
rural and high unemployment areas. Finally, they smear the reputations of conscientious
regional center operators who work hard do everything right with one hand tied behind
their back, partially blindfolded on treacherous terrain.
The regional center unfairly smeared in this instance is the New York City Regional Center,
a client my firm has worked with closely for the past three years to obtain initial designation
and subsequent amendments.
Here are just some things the blogger has gotten wrong:
1. “Not only does it look like the United States is selling visas, but the terms are
easier than in other countries.”
Wrong. For example, the federal Canadian investor program has three basic requirements:
1. Business experience
2. Minimum net worth of CN$800,000 (US$560,000)
3. Investment of CN$400,000 (US$281,000).
There is no requirement that any jobs be created. The Canadian government holds the
money for five years, after which it is returned to the investor without interest.
The low threshold is responsible for the vast oversubscription of the Canadian investor
program, resulting in a current three-year backlog.
2. “The EB-5 controversy.”
Wrong again. In a Congress notable for partisan bickering, the EB-5 program is among the
few that both Republicans and Democrats endorse.
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Representative Zoe Lofgren
(D-CA) and Representative Steve King (R-IA) are all on record as EB-5 supporters. No one
in Congress has criticized the EB-5 program.
"[T]he costs of using investment funds are relatively lower than the costs of bank loans. […]
[W]e are in pursuit of profit maximization.” The blogger adds a condemning gloss: “That
may impress potential investors, but sure seems to contradict the spirit—and perhaps the
letter—of the EB-5 program.”
Wrong again. The law requires the EB-5 new commercial enterprise to seek a profit.
Nonprofits are barred as proper recipients of EB-5 money in the regulatory definition of
“commercial enterprise.” So both the spirit and the letter of the EB-5 program embrace the
profit-making drive and, in fact, require it.
4. “That’s why the USCIS and the rest of the press should give this ‘project’
serious scrutiny.”
He apparently doesn’t know that USCIS did give this project serious scrutiny. USCIS
approved the project in an amendment filed by the regional center in question – a filing
called an “exemplar” I-526 petition for pre-approval of a project. Or perhaps the blogger
thinks that the Wall Street Journal is not serious enough press? The Journal recently
covered the development project in an article dated May 10, 2010, including the EB-5
component.
Everyone involved in the EB-5 program – regional center operators, investors, attorneys,
advisors, and USCIS – have much at stake in the proper administration of this program.
When there are inaccuracies about the program, or the program as applied to certain
projects, it harms everyone doing their best to contribute to a clean system. It’s one thing if
we have disagreements about what the program should look like. It’s another thing when
someone tries to tear down the program to further another agenda. Let’s at least agree to
resist the latter.
December
• Major Media Outlet Publishes Harsh Critique of the EB-5 Visa Program
• Deadline to Participate in ILW.com Seminar Rapidly Approaching
• New EB-5 Statistics Made Public at USCIS Stakeholder Meeting
• EB-5 Stakeholders, Economists Comment on Letter from Director Mayorkas to
Senator Leahy
• South Florida EB-5-Funded Marina to Operate on "Fractional Ownership"
• Milwaukee EB-5 Construction Project Forced to Compromise with Preservationists
Prominent voices from the EB-5 community are featured in the story,
among them Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration attorney who
Reuters declares the "unofficial dean of the EB-5 bar," and attorney
Jose Latour, who runs the popular blog "Immigration Insider."
Stephen Yale-Loehr Michael Gibson of USAdvisors.org also contributes to the piece.
"As sources of domestic capital have dried up, developers have tried to scramble to find
other ways to finance their projects either in whole or in part," Yale-Loehr told Reuters,
noting just how attractive foreign investment capital has become to players in a down real
estate market.
According to Gibson, many former peddlers of sub-prime mortgages are now promoting
regional center projects and "will tell investors almost anything they can to get them to sign
the subscription agreement."
Citing the practices of Maslink, a firm that markets the EB-5 program in China, Reuters
reveals how firm operator Jason Lee's pitch to prospective investors violates a
fundamental rule of EB-5 law by suggesting that investors will get all of their $500,000
investment back if the project – in this case, the re-opening of an Idaho gold mine – were
to fail.
Even so, the expose paints a critical picture of what the EB-5
program has brought upon the immigrant investor community
that has sought to utilize it:
But 4,489 of the applicants were rejected outright for any number of reasons, including an
inability to prove to the government's satisfaction that the funds they proposed to invest
came from legal sources. Another 848 are still pending.
Of the 8,382 immigrant investors who were allowed into the program and granted
conditional visas over the years, 5,748 have theoretically been in the country long enough
to apply for unconditional green cards - the permanent resident status that represents the
finish line.
So how many have actually reached that milestone during the past 20 years? Just 3,127
investors. The other 2,621 have either had their applications for permanent residency
rejected, fallen into some sort of legal limbo or just given up and gone back home with their
families in tow and their dreams broken.
In other words, only 54 percent of the immigrants who start the process of gaining
permanent residency using the EB-5 program actually attain it. That's a coin toss, not a
slam dunk. Yet the businesses marketing the program promote it as a sure thing.
Also listed among Reuters's causes for concern is the common practice among
immigration attorneys of accepting undisclosed commissions in return for steering clients
toward a particular regional center or centers – a glaring conflict of interest that "may
violate U.S. securities laws" or even turn into a nasty malpractice suit if a client's EB-5
investment heads south.
The Association to Invest in the U.S.A. (IIUSA) – profiled briefly in the article – came into
being in large part to curb some of these less savory practices, in particular the habit of
attorneys collecting finders fees.
Whether such actions will ultimately abate or continue thriving is impossible to predict. The
picture painted by Reuters, however, isn't exactly optimistic.
ILW.com EB-5 for Experts Phone Seminar Series – Registration
Deadline: January 11
With speakers: Michael Gibson, Robert C. Divine, Robert Gaffney, J. Bennett Grocock,
Michael G. Homeier, Elizabeth Hurst, John Patrick Pratt and Sarah von Helfenstein
To follow-up to the December 30 seminar, ILW.com will host two more phone sessions on
January 13 and February 3. Below are the details from ILW.com:
SECOND Phone Session on January 13: Securities law: Avoiding Litigation and
Rescission – REGISTRATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 11, 2011, 11:59 PM!
What factors improve the chance of success in an EB-5 investment? This session will
address the roles of capital, debt and equity, cash flow, and other factors that are critical to
making an informed decision in assessing the strength and weakness of the offering.
Topics:
• Why proper valuation of risk is important
• Factors used in evaluating risk, research, due diligence
• The importance of capital
• The importance of the timeline in project completion
• Cash flow
• Equity v. Debt
• The role of management, competition & market
• The decision making process
• Comparisons of dissimilar projects
• Risk ratings and standards in risk valuations
One remarkable feature of the presentation, which is available in full at the USCIS website,
is the 55% drop in overall issuance of the EB-5 visa in 2010 compared to the previous
year. According to the presentation, 1,885 EB-5 visas were issued in 2010 compared with
4,218 in 2009. The drop likely reflects an effort in 2009 to expedite the EB-5 approval
process pending the previous "sunset date" for the program.
That means several new EB-5 regional centers could begin competing for investors in
2011. Currently, 120 regional centers have been approved by USCIS.
On December 3 2010, a letter received by the Office of Senator Patrick Leahy (D–VT) from
USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas confirmed that USCIS interpretation of EB-5 law does,
in fact, allow for the counting of indirect jobs outside a regional center's approved
geographic boundaries. Although a regional center must still "focus its EB-5 capital
investment activities on a single, contiguous area within the defined geographic jurisdiction
requested by the regional center," according to the letter, indirect jobs outside the
approved investment zone may be included in job creation totals.
"We knew this was incorrect because it defied logic, was insupportable
by statute law, case law, or regulations, and the California Service Center Boyd Campbell
was ignoring the statement," said Campbell. "But still, we needed some
assurance that someone of Director Mayorkas's stature and authority agreed that this is
incorrect."
Many economists' reactions to the letter were positive as well, with Judson C. Edwards of
Edwards Economics offering the following comments:
This letter adds needed clarity for economists analyzing impacts for EB-5
projects. In my opinion, this opens the door for national economic impact
studies becoming the standard for all EB-5 job creation models – making
enforcement of regional center boundaries applicable only to the location
of the direct jobs. Accordingly, the national impacts would provide
maximum indirect job creation for qualifying projects and simplify the
justification for
calculation.
Edwards adds, "It will be interesting to see how this 'national focus' will be
Dr. Judson C.
accepted by USCIS." Edwards
While largely a breath of fresh air for EB-5 stakeholders concerned about
the future of their job counting methodologies, others in the EB-5
community are approaching the letter with caution.
"While the economist has a good idea of what the likely impact area is
from most types of economic activities," they argue, "the Regional
Center principals likely do not and will feel the need to press for greater
job creation outside the defined region because of this current ruling."
Both economists also believe the letter may "amplify a trend already
Dr. Alan Hodges
underway whereby the geographic areas of proposed Regional Centers
seem to be expanding to entire states or multi-state areas, primarily to
apply the Regional Center’s existing businesses to a larger geographic area,
but given the recent ruling, to also increase the indirect jobs created by their
economic activity."
Jeff Carr of Economic & Policy Resources is also skeptical. "I am not sure
this is the panacea that everyone thinks it is," he said.
"Some EB-5 projects may actually result in a net loss of jobs outside of the
Jeff Carr
regional center (e.g. a facility location and expansion), so are some folks
going to now subtract job losses outside of the regional center from regional
center job impacts to arrive at the net new number of jobs?"
Whether Mayorkas's statement provides clarity or confusion, it is sure to affect the way
regional centers and economists approach the geographic and job creation models of
current and upcoming EB-5 initiatives.
Here's how it works: Marina racks won't be sold to individual buyers, but instead to six
different owners. Each boat owner then has the ability to use any boat in the whole
complex. That way, the boat owner can choose which type of boat he or she wants to use
depending on his or her desired activity. Heise hopes this concept will attract boat owners
who want more bang – and more boat – for their buck.
According to Heise, "the average boater only uses his boat 30 days a year." Fractional
ownership in a marina should provide more value to boat owners and, if you ask Heise,
"[reduce] the cost of boat ownership to about half."
Heise said he got the idea for fractionalized marina ownership from NetJets, the Columbus,
Ohio, company that began selling fractional ownership shares in jets back in 1986 and was
purchased by billionaire investor Warren Buffet 12 years later.
To make his project a success, Heise said he needs to raise $34 million — on top of his
family's $3.5 million contribution.
At a time when accessing capital to fund any real estate-related project in Florida is almost
impossible, Heise is deploying another novel idea.
He intends to tap into the federal government's EB-5 visa program, which is designed to
help foreigners expedite the process of applying for green cards by encouraging them to
invest in businesses that create jobs in the United States.
Heise also tells the paper that his EB-5 brokers are bringing him 10 to 20 investors at a
time. He wants to have a fully operational marina that employs in excess of 150 people by
2012.
To handle demand for boats during busy seasons, Heise will create ownership levels that
range from $30,000 to $100,000 per year. Those who pay the most money will get the
most access to the most boats.
If he can just "take some of [the hassle associated with boat ownership] away" from boat
owners, Heise tells the Herald-Tribune, this somewhat unusual venture will be successful.
In a report, preservationists noted the structures' past uses, which include housing the first
Jewish English-language newspaper in Wisconsin. The buildings are also excellent
examples of Italianate design, according to the report.
Steve Bass, on behalf of MMAC, suggested before the commission that the buildings were
not actually historic, but "merely old."
Supporters of the Marriott project cite its potential to create 350 to 450 construction jobs
and up to 200 hotel jobs after construction. Estimated annual tax revenue from the hotel
stands at $2.26 million.
Although it appears an appeal of the commission's decision may be out of the question –
the decision was unanimous – the developer has expressed concern over the feasibility of
incorporating existing facades into its construction plan.
Appendix A:
USCIS-Approved EB-5 Regional Centers
Office of Communications
The guidance memorandum update to the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) clarifies that for purposes
of the Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur (Form I-526) adjudication and the job creation
requirements, USCIS will consider the two-year period to begin six months after the adjudication of the
Form I-526.
USCIS officers will ensure that the business plan filed with the Form I-526 reasonably demonstrates that
the requisite number of jobs will be created by the end of the two-year period. For Regional Center
petitions and for purposes of indirect job creation, USCIS adjudicators may consider economic models
that rely on certain variables to show job creation and the amount of investment to determine whether the
required infusion of capital or creation of direct jobs will result in a certain number of indirect jobs.
USCIS also has concluded that certain direct and indirect jobs that would have previously been
considered to be temporary or intermittent (such as construction jobs) may be considered as permanent
jobs for Form I-526 and the Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions (Form I-829) purposes if the
positions can be expected to last at least 2 years.
– USCIS –
www.uscis.gov
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Office of Domestic Operations
Washington, DC 20529
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8
AD09-04
Memorandum
To: SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS
REGIONAL DIRECTORS
DISTRICT DIRECTORS
FIELD OFFICE DIRECTORS
NATIONAL BENEFIT CENTER DIRECTOR
1. Purpose
This AFM update provides United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
personnel with instructions related to the timing of job creation and the meaning of “full-
time” positions in the EB-5 program.
The AFM update clarifies that each petitioner must submit a business plan, along with their
Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur, which provides an accounting of the
required number of qualifying jobs that will be created within the two-year period of
conditional residency. This AFM update also clarifies that there may be some flexibility with
respect to the timing of job creation at the Form I-829, Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove
Conditions, stage. Finally, this AFM update clarifies the meaning of full-time position as it
relates to job creation.
The AFM update conforms the filing locations with the Federal Register Notice dated
January 9, 2009, 74 Fed. Reg. 912-913.
2. Relevant Laws
INA § 203(b)(5) creates a class of immigrant visas (EB-5) for individuals who invest a
specified amount of capital in the United States and who will “create full-time employment
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 2
for not fewer than 10” qualified employees. INA § 216A places conditions upon the
permanent resident status of aliens admitted in the EB-5 classification that must be removed
at the end of a two-year period of conditional residency. In order to have the conditions
removed, EB-5 visa holders must file a Form I-829 that demonstrates that the petitioner is,
among other requirements, “conforming to the requirements of INA § 203(b)(5).” INA §
216A(d)(1)(B).
Consistent with the two-year period of conditional residency, USCIS regulations generally
require evidence to obtain approval of a Form I-526, including a business plan that
demonstrates that jobs will be created within the two-year period of conditional residence. 8
C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B).
USCIS regulations relating to the removal conditions from the lawful permanent resident
status of alien entrepreneurs status provide that a petitioner must demonstrate that “the alien
has created or can be expected to create within a reasonable period of time” the required jobs.
8 C.F.R. § 216.6(c)(1)(iv).
Effective immediately, USCIS personnel are directed to comply with the following
instructions, as set forth in revisions to the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) noted in
section 5, as summarized below.
For purposes of the Form I-526 adjudication and the job creation requirements, USCIS will
deem the two-year period described in 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B) to commence six months
after the adjudication of the Form I-526. USCIS officers should ensure that the business plan
filed with the Form I-526 reasonably demonstrates that the requisite number of jobs will be
created by the end of this two-year period.
For Regional Center petitions and for purposes of indirect job creation, USCIS officers may
consider economic models that rely on certain variables to show job creation and the amount
of investment to determine whether the required infusion of capital or creation of direct jobs
will result in a certain number of indirect jobs.
USCIS also has concluded that direct and indirect construction jobs that are created by the
petitioner’s investment and that are expected to last at least 2 years may now count as
permanent jobs for Form I-526 and I-829 purposes.
4. Use
This AFM update is intended solely for the guidance of USCIS personnel in performing their
duties relative to adjudications. It is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or by any individual
or other party in removal proceedings, in litigation with the United States, or in any other
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 3
form or manner. In addition, the instruction and guidance in this AFM update is in no way
intended to and does not prohibit enforcement of the immigration laws of the United States.
5. Contact Information
Chapter 22.4(c)(4)(D) of the AFM is amended to number it as three subsections and include
the new subsections (ii) and (iii) at the end of Paragraph (D) and prior to the Note.
(i) The petition must be supported with evidence the new commercial enterprise
will create no fewer than 10 full-time positions (or the equivalent). ….
***********
(ii) Clarification of the Two-Year Period for Job Creation.
(a) Petitioners who are filing a Form I-526 must submit “a comprehensive
business plan showing that, due to the nature and projected size of the new
commercial enterprise, the need for not fewer than ten (10) qualifying
employees will result, including approximate dates, within the next two-years,
and when each employee will be hired.” 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B)
(emphasis added). The requirement for a business plan that shows jobs will
be created in two years applies to all Form I-526 petitions, including those
filed under the Regional Center Program, that will rely on indirect job creation
to satisfy the statutory employment creation requirement.
The regulations, however, do not clearly state when the two-year period
commences for purposes of adjudicating the Form I-526. The reference to a
two-year period relates to the two-year period of conditional residence, and
the time requirement of 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B) is intended to ensure that
aliens seeking to enter the United States on EB-5 visas have a legitimate and
feasible plan to create jobs as required by the statute within that period of
conditional residence. Nevertheless, at the time of adjudication of Form I-
526, the alien entrepreneur will not have attained conditional permanent
residence, and the officer adjudicating Form I-526 cannot be certain when the
period of conditional residence will in fact commence.
USCIS has determined that the average processing times for EB-5 petitioners
filing for immigrant visas via consular processing and EB-5 petitioners filing
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 4
For example, the RIMSII handbook states the following about the RIMSII
economic model, which is often used to demonstrate indirect job creation:
This assumption supports the conclusion that the indirect jobs will be
created within the requisite two-year period.
(ii) Many economic models used to demonstrate indirect job creation rely
on certain assumptions or variables to show the requisite job creation. For
example, a model might demonstrate that the requisite jobs will be created
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 5
Nothing in this paragraph should be construed to alter in any way the current
adjudication procedures. Officers may review the evidence required by the
petitioner to demonstrate the number of jobs that will be created by the
investment. For example, Form I-526s filed under the Regional Center Program
which rely on indirect job creation must also comply with the evidentiary
requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(4)(iii) to demonstrate the number of jobs
created. Officers may also continue to determine the reasonableness of a
business plan to ensure that the jobs are likely to be created.
Section 203(b)(5) of the INA requires that the investment in a new commercial
enterprise will create full-time employment for not fewer than 10 qualified
employees. The INA further defines full-time employment as “employment in a
position that requires at least 35 hours or service per week at any time,
regardless of who fills the position.” USCIS has interpreted the full-time
employment requirement to exclude jobs that are intermittent, temporary,
seasonal or transient in nature. See, e.g., Spencer Enterprises v. U.S., 229
F.Supp.2d 1025 (E.D.Cal. 2001). For example, historically, construction jobs
have not been counted toward job creation because they are seen as
intermittent, temporary, seasonal and transient rather than permanent.
USCIS, however, now interprets that direct and indirect construction jobs that are
created by the petitioner’s investment and that are expected to last at least 2
years, inclusive of when the petitioner’s I-829 is filed, may now count as
permanent jobs. Although employment in some industries such as construction
or tourism can be intermittent, temporary, seasonal or transient, officers should
not exclude jobs simply because they fall into such industries. Rather, the focus
of the adjudication should be on whether the position, as described in the
petition, is continuous full-time employment rather than intermittent, temporary,
seasonal or transient. For example, if a petition reasonably describes the need
for general laborers in a construction project that is expected to last several years
and would require a minimum of 35 hours per week over the course of that
project, the positions would meet the full-time employment requirement.
However, if, for example, the same project called for electrical workers to provide
services during three to four five week periods over the course of the project,
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 6
such positions would be properly deemed to be intermittent and not meet the
definition of full-time employment.
Generally, it is the position that is critical to the full-time employment criterion, not
the employee. Accordingly, the fact that the position may be filled by more than
one employee does not exclude a position from consideration as full-time
employment. For example, the positions described above would not be excluded
from being considered full-time employment if the general laborers needed to fill
the positions varied from day to day or week to week as long as the need for the
position remains constant. This interpretation is consistent with 8 C.F.R. §
204.6(e), which, as part of the regulatory definition of full-time employment
includes job sharing arrangements.
It is important to note, however, that this new interpretation does not override the
regulatory definitions of employee and full time employment at 8 C.F.R. §
204.6(e). Thus, the positions must still be filled by qualifying employees, and
such positions may not be filled by independent contractors. In addition, multiple
part time positions may not be combined to create one full time position.
2. Chapter 25.2(e)(1) of the AFM is amended to include the following new paragraph at the
beginning of Paragraph (1). The existing Paragraph (1) will now become Paragraph (2) and
so on.
(1) Initial Review. Form I-829 petition is intended to examine whether the alien
entrepreneur has satisfied the conditions of his admission to the United States.
Primarily, USCIS is determining whether the alien has invested the requisite capital
and created the requisite jobs through that investment. Form I-829 petition is to be
filed within 90 days prior to the second anniversary of the alien’s admission to the
United States in conditional resident status.
3. Chapter 25.2(e)(4)(D) of the AFM is amended to include the following new paragraphs at the
end of Paragraph (D).
Recognizing that circumstances may change after an alien secures admission to the
United States, USCIS chose to implement INA § 216A with some “flexibility.” See,
59 FR 1317-01, 1317-18 (Jan. 10, 1994) (proposed rule). Consistent with this
flexibility, USCIS provides that Form I-829 must contain evidence that the petitioning
alien “has created or can be expected to create within a reasonable time ten full-time
jobs for qualifying employees.” 8 C.F.R. § 216.6(a)(4)(iv).
In making the “reasonable time” determination, officers should consider the evidence
submitted along with the petition that demonstrates when the jobs are expected to
be created, the reasons that the jobs were not created as predicted in Form I-526,
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 7
the nature of the industry or industries in which the jobs are to be created, and any
other evidence submitted by the petitioner.
If after considering the evidence, the officer determines that the jobs are more likely
than not going to be created within a reasonable time, Form I-829 should be
approved consistent with 8 C.F.R. § 216.6(d)(1) if the petitioner is otherwise eligible
to have his or her conditions removed. If, however, the officer determines that the
jobs will not be created within a reasonable period of time, Form I-829 should be
denied consistent with 8 C.F.R. § 216.6(d)(2).
4. Chapters 22.4(b), 25.2(a), 25.2(b), 25.2(g)(1), and 25.2(i)(2)(C) of the AFM are revised to
reference that all petitions and applications related EB-5 immigrant classifications and
Regional Center proposals must be filed at the California Service Center (CSC).
Chapter 25.2(a)
California Service Center director, regional directors and field office directors in
offices with a high volume of Form I-829s shall designate an EB-5 trained and
certified officer as an EB-5 point of contact (POC) to facilitate the review and
management of Form I-829. For purposes of clarity in these instructions, references
to service center management and field office management includes the appropriate
EB-5 POC.
Chapter 25.2(b)
Officers are reminded that, in accordance with the Notice in the Federal Register at
74 Fed. Reg. 912-913, published on, and in effect since, January 9, 2009, Form I-
829 petitions are to be filed with the California Service Center.
Chapter 25.2(g)(1)
All such Form I-829s shall be returned to the California Service Center.
Chapter 25.2(i)(2)(C)
The California Service Center shall generate weekly a printout from the MFAS to
determine those conditional residents within its jurisdiction who have failed to file a
timely Form I-829 to have the conditions on their status removed in accordance with
section 216A(c) of the Act and will take the actions described above in this section to
terminate the status of such conditional residents and their dependents.
Clarification of Two-Year Period the Meaning of Full-Time Positions for Job Creation by EB-5
Alien Entrepreneurs
HQDOMO 70/6.1.8 AD09-04
Page 8
5. The AFM Transmittal Memoranda button is revised by adding a new entry, in numerical
order, to read:
S. ll
111TH CONGRESS
2D SESSION
A BILL
To establish an employment-based immigrant visa for alien
entrepreneurs who have received significant capital from
investors to establish a business in the United States.
2
1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para-
2 graph (7); and
3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol-
4 lowing:
5 ‘‘(6) SPONSORED ENTREPRENEURS.—
3
1 furtherance of a commercial entity
2 based in the United States; or
3 ‘‘(III) generate not less than
4 $1,000,000 in revenue.
5 ‘‘(B) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph:
6 ‘‘(i) QUALIFIED SUPER ANGEL INVES-
4
1 ‘‘(III) is comprised of partners,
2 the majority of whom are United
3 States citizens;
4 ‘‘(IV) has capital commitments of
5 not less than $10,000,000;
6 ‘‘(V) has been operating for at
7 least 2 years; and
8 ‘‘(VI) has made at least 2 invest-
9 ments of not less than $500,000 dur-
10 ing each of the most recent 2 years.’’.
11 (b) CONDITIONAL PERMANENT RESIDENT STA-
12 TUS.—Section 216A of the Immigration and Nationality
13 Act (8 U.S.C. 1186b) is amended—
14 (1) by striking ‘‘Attorney General’’ each place
15 such term appears and inserting ‘‘Secretary of
16 Homeland Security’’;
17 (2) in subsection (a)—
18 (A) in paragraph (1)—
19 (i) by striking ‘‘(as defined in sub-
20 section (f)(1))’’ and inserting ‘‘, sponsored
21 entrepreneur’’; and
22 (ii) by striking ‘‘(as defined in sub-
23 section (f)(2)) shall’’ and inserting ‘‘shall
24 each’’;
MDM10086 [Discussion Draft] S.L.C.
5
1 (B) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting
2 ‘‘sponsored entrepreneur,’’ after ‘‘alien entre-
3 preneur,’’;
4 (3) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the
5 following:
6 ‘‘(3) SPONSORED ENTREPRENEURS.—The Sec-
7 retary of Homeland Security shall terminate the per-
8 manent resident status of a sponsored entrepreneur
9 and the alien spouse and children of such entre-
10 preneur if the Secretary determines, not later than
11 3 years after the date on which such permanent resi-
12 dent status was conferred, that—
13 ‘‘(A) the qualified venture capitalist or
14 qualified super angel investor who sponsored
15 the entrepreneur failed to meet the investment
16 requirements under section 203(b)(6)(A)(i); or
17 ‘‘(B) the entrepreneur failed to meet the
18 job creation, capital investment, or revenue gen-
19 eration requirements under section
20 203(b)(6)(A)(ii).’’;
21 (4) in subsection (c)—
22 (A) in paragraph (1)—
23 (i) in the matter preceding subpara-
24 graph (A), by inserting ‘‘sponsored entre-
25 preneur,’’ after ‘‘alien entrepreneur,’’; and
MDM10086 [Discussion Draft] S.L.C.
6
1 (ii) by striking ‘‘alien entrepreneur
2 must’’ each place such term appears and
3 inserting ‘‘entrepreneur shall’’;
4 (B) in paragraph (3)—
5 (i) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by insert-
6 ing ‘‘or sponsored entrepreneur’’ after
7 ‘‘alien entrepreneur’’; and
8 (ii) in subparagraph (C), by inserting
9 ‘‘sponsored entrepreneur,’’ after ‘‘alien en-
10 trepreneur’’;
11 (5) in subsection (d)(1)—
12 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph
13 (A), by striking ‘‘alien’’ and inserting ‘‘alien en-
14 trepreneur or sponsored entrepreneur, as appli-
15 cable’’;
16 (B) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘invested, or
17 is actively in the process of investing,’’ and in-
18 serting ‘‘has invested, is actively in the process
19 of investing, or has been sponsored by a quali-
20 fied super angel investor or qualified venture
21 capitalist who has invested,’’;
22 (C) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘or
23 203(b)(6), as applicable’’ before the period at
24 the end; and
MDM10086 [Discussion Draft] S.L.C.
7
1 (6) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the
2 following:
3 ‘‘(4) The term ‘sponsored entrepreneur’ means
4 an alien who obtains the status of an alien lawfully
5 admitted for permanent residence under section
6 203(b)(6).’’.
Appendix K:
Notice of Intent to Terminate, USCIS to Victorville Regional Center
Appendix L:
Notice of Final Termination, USCIS to Victorville Regional Center
Appendix M:
Letter, USCIS Director to Senator Patrick Leahy
12/09/2010 16:39 FAX 2023052707 DOJIINS/HQ
u.s. Citizenship
and Immigration
NO , Services
DEC - 3 2010 •
Thank. you for your September 27, 2010 letter regarding the EB-5 Regional Center Program
administered by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). You expressed your view
that, contrary to USCIS's existing interpretation, a proposed regional center business plan may
encompass job creation outside the center's geographic boundaries. Upon review of the applicable
EB-5 law and regulations, we agree that a regional center may rely on jobs indirectly created
outside its geographic boundaries.
USCIS's interpretation derived from the geographic requirements identified in Matter ofIzummi, 22
I&N 158 (Comm'r. 1998), and other sources. Matter of[zummi holds that if a new
enterpriSe is engaged directly or indirectly in lending money to job-creating businesses, those
job-creating businesses must all be-located within the regional center's geographic limits.
Similarly, Section 61O(a) of the Departments of Commerce, Justice and _state, the Judiciary, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1993, Pub. L. 102-395, as provides that "[a]
regional center shall have jurisdiction over a limited geographic area, which shall be described in
the proposal and consistent with the purpose of concentrating pooled investment in defined
economic zones." Likewise, USCIS's regulation at 8 CFR 204.6(m)(3)(i) requires each regional
center to provide a proposal that "clearly describes how the regional center focuses on a geographic
region of the United States."
Based on those sources, USCIS interprets the law to require that a regional center focus its EB-5
capital investment activities on a single, contiguous area within the dermed geographic jurisdiction
requested by the regional center. Nevertheless, we agree that the law does. not further mandate that
all indirect job creation attributable to a regional center take place within that jurisdiction. I will,
therefore, ensure that USCIS policy reflects this understanding of the law.
Thank you again for your letter. I assure you that USCIS maintains its commitment to the success
of the EB-5 Regional Center Program. I look forward to our continued collaboration on important
issues of mutual interest.
Sincerely,
Director
Skype: usadvisors
Twitter: @EB5info