Trial Technique
Trial Technique
Trial Technique
Credibility of Evidence
1. Evidence must conform to common experience. To the trial judge, probabilities rest
largely on evidence. Indeed, trial is a contest of probability.
2. The inference drawn from the evidence presented is logical. A conclusion that defies
logic cannot be believed.
3. The critical evidence is compatible with undeniable evidence of record. Object evidence
is the highest form of evidence. A testimony that is incompatible with it cannot be
believed.
4. The essential evidence is consistent with the surrounding circumstances.An asserted
fact, if true, should be supported by evidence of the circumstances that surround it, such
as:
a. Antecedent Circumstances- A party’s claim that a fact is true should be
consistent with the events preceding the occurrence of that fact.
b. Concomitant circumstances
c. Subsequent circumstances
5. A credible witness gives the evidence.- Even when the facts he narrated are logical and
natural, the known character of the witness for lying could make his statement
unbelievable.
6. The witness relates his story spontaneously. A testimony to be believed must have no
traces of coaching and rehearsal.
7. Witness has been consistent in his statements.
8. The demeanor of the witness reflects a character for truth.
A. Preparation
Trial Brief- is the counsel’s personal strategy and materials for the trial. Trial brief
specifies the plans for assaulting the opponent’s position or defending the counsel’s own
cause.It is to be distinguished from the Pre-trial Brief that the court usually requires the
parties to submit before the pre-trial conference.
● (Map of the Terrain) The counsel needs to have access to all the facts and the
documents relating to the legal dispute involved in the case. The counsel need to
arrange the facts in some order that will speed up his research. A collection of
the applicable laws and rules and a drawing of the issue/s for trial would
complete the map for trial.
● (troops and weapons) The counsel needs to assess the value of the testimonies
of the witnesses and the available documentary evidence from both sides. The
assessment will enable the counsel to determine how best to use what evidence
he has for building the case and to demolish that of the opponent.
● If the counsel have an organized and comprehensive trial brief, he does not have
to re-read the record of the case each time the court sets it for trial.
The point in making the summaries of opposing claims of the parties is to enable
you to see clearly where the issue/s lies.
Knowing the applicable laws will expand the counsel’s understanding of what the
dispute among the parties is about. Knowledge of the applicable law will help the
counsel examine his options and adopt a winning position that is consistent with
such law.
Be sure to include in the search laws and cases that the opposing party can
invoke against you to avoid being trapped into unwittingly stipulating some facts
that could harm your case.
Factual issue- an issue becomes factual when the contending parties cannot
agree that a thing exists or has actually happened.
● Only factual issues are tried in court and are resolved by weighing the
conflicting evidence of the parties. Legal issues are decided by applying
the law on the established facts of the case.
● Consist of a brief statement of what facts you have to prove to win the
case, taking into account the applicable laws and Supreme Court
decisions and evidence that you expect the other side to prove.
● Be an outline of how memorandum of arguments will look when you
submit it to the court at the end of trial.
● Not be a mere repetition of the summary of the opposing claims of the
parties.
● It is the theory of the case that will guide you in formulating your trial
strategy and your search for testimonial and documentary evidence.
The narration of the witness should contain evidentiary details that would enable
the judge to clearly and vividly visualize the incidents subject of the testimony.
6. Exhibit files
This will consist of originals of your exhibit and their photocopies in case you
prefer to keep the originals and leave only the photocopies with the court after
obtaining stipulation that the latter copies are faithful reproduction of the originals.
7. Detailed outline of the facts that your opponent’s evidence will prove.
You should have the list of witnesses for the opposite side with a detailed recital
of their detailed testimonies.
8. Cross-examination guide.
This should consist of probable questions that you could ask your opponent’s
witness to demolish his testimony.
After each hearing, make a brief summary of the testimonies of the witnesses
presented and the documentary evidence brought up in the course of such
testimonies.