Claire Brandes - Barnett Essay

Moral Development in William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”
William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning” tells the story of a young boy, Sarty, and his father, a
man who exhibits a pattern of criminal and dishonest behavior. Both demonstrate differing levels
of maturity with regards to their moral reasoning skills. These levels are reflected in Kohlberg’s
Theory of Moral Development, which includes three levels of moral development that are further
subdivided into six stages (OpenStax College, 301). Both Sarty and Abner’s actions are
characteristic of several of Kohlberg’s stages, allowing for their moral development to be
followed throughout the piece. Abner appears set in his criminal ways, and Sarty initially
demonstrates compliance. However, Sarty later shows that he is beginning to redefine what he
considers to be right and wrong. Ultimately, Sarty shows that he is more morally mature than his
father.
Abner shows an immature sense of morality. When Abner suspects that Sarty is going to
alert the justice of the Peace that his father was to blame for Mr. Harris’ barn burning, he
reprimands Sarty by telling him to “stick to your own blood or you ain’t going to have any blood
to stick to you.” Essentially, he is advocating that Sarty lie in the interest of preserving the
family, or else the family will not show loyalty to him in return. In actuality, Abner is
manipulating his son to lie to protect Abner himself, the only true criminal in the Snopes family.
This blatant manipulation of his own son shows that Abner’s only interest is to evade the law.
This is the defining characteristic of stage one of pre-conventional morality, where “behavior is
driven by avoiding punishment” (OpenStax College, 301). Additionally, Abner acts according to
self-interest, a trait characteristic of stage two of pre-conventional morality. His character shows
a complete disregard for the law, from committing arson to spite those who have “wronged” him
to stealing horses during the Civil War. These actions demonstrate that he does what he wants
while disregarding how he may be negatively affecting others. According to Kohlberg, this
pattern of selfish behavior is characterized by stage two of pre-conventional morality, where
“behavior is driven by self-interest and rewards” (OpenStax College, 301). As an adult, Abner
should display post-conventional morality, where “behavior is driven by the balance of social
order and individual rights.” However, his moral growth is clearly stunted as the level of
morality he displays here is typically expected of a young child (OpenStax College, 301-302).
In the beginning of the story, Sarty’s moral compass is governed by his loyalty to his
family. In one of the first glimpses inside Sarty’s head, he thinks that the justice of the Peace and
Mr. Harris are the “enemy.” This is due to his perception that they oppose his family. Sarty even
attacks a stranger outside of the store in defense of his family after his father is called a “barn
burner.” His behavior is driven by seeking social approval from his family members as all of his
actions and thoughts have been in defense of them. In this way, Sarty displays stage three of
conventional morality, where “behavior is driven by social approval” (OpenStax College, 302).
Moreso, Sarty seeks approval particularly from his father, which is evident when he lies to the
justice of the Peace, telling him that Abner was not responsible for the barn burning. Sarty knows
this act will please his father specifically. Although the behavioral model Sarty adheres to is not
ideal, he already displays a more mature sense of morality than Abner with regards to Kohlberg’s
theory.
When Sarty attempts to pacify Abner’s rage in order to stop him from hurting any more
people, he shows he has matured in his moral reasoning. After Abner is punished by de Spain for
ruining his rug, Sarty anticipates Abner’s anger and preemptively tries to calm him. Faulkner’s
use of language such as “…he cried” emphasizes the desperation in Sarty’s voice while he tries
to placate Abner. Furthermore, once Sarty believes he has successfully controlled Abner’s anger,
he begins to daydream that the “terror and grief” caused by his father will finally come to an end.
Sarty is then clearly shocked and upset when he realizes Abner is going to follow through with
the barn-burning anyway. This reaction is the first piece of definitive evidence that Sarty is
beginning to disapprove of his father and foreshadows Sarty completely defying him. The action
Sarty takes here against his father is also the precursor for his advancement to stage four of
conventional morality.
By warning de Spain about Abner, Sarty shows that his moral reasoning has matured.
When he tries to prevent his father’s feelings of anger, Sarty shows that he is apprehensive about
the morality of his father’s attitude. However, his advancement in moral reasoning is solidified
when he saves de Spain’s barn from the same fate as Mr. Harris’. As the story reaches its climax,
Sarty demonstrates a distinct shift in character as he warns de Spain even with the knowledge
that he is jeopardizing the safety and freedom of his family, especially Abner. He even thinks, “I
could run on and on and never look back, never need to see his face again. Only I can’t.” Here
Sarty acknowledges that he could simply leave his family behind in the interest of his own
safety, but decides to selflessly save de Spain’s property instead. This is the distinct and defiant
act that shows he has reached stage four of conventional morality, where “behavior is driven by
obeying authority and conforming to social order” (OpenStax College, 302). Sarty conforms to
societal values in which respecting the law is the norm.
In the end, Sarty develops an advanced view of morality compared to Abner. Although
Sarty’s initial sense of morality is similar his father’s, he displays a precocious sense of morality
by the end of the piece as Kohlberg theorized that individuals typically reach stages of
conventional morality in adolescence, and Sarty has not yet reached this age (OpenStax College,
301). By demonstrating his alignment with stage four of conventional morality, he has surpassed
not only his father with regards to moral development, but other children his age. Additionally,
the fact that he has followed this natural development thus far gives reason to believe that Sarty
will continue to develop a healthy sense of morality as he matures into adulthood. Faulkner’s
piece shows that a child’s view of morality does not always mirror that of their family or peers,
and that they may develop an individual sense of morality.

References
Faulkner, William. "Barn Burning."Harper's Magazine, June 1939, reprinted in Collected Stories,
New York: Random House, 1950.
OpenStax College, Psychology. OpenStax College. 8 December 2014.

http://cnx.org/content/col11629/latest/.

Claire Brandes - Barnett Essay

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Claire Brandes - Barnett Essay

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Claire Brandes - Barnett Essay

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Moral Development in William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”

characteristic of several of Kohlberg’s stages, allowing for their moral development to be

pattern of selfish behavior is characterized by stage two of pre-conventional morality, where

societal values in which respecting the law is the norm.

and that they may develop an individual sense of morality.

OpenStax College, Psychology. OpenStax College. 8 December 2014.

You might also like