Remifentanil Use in Anaesthesia and Critical Care: Basic Science Tutorial 342
Remifentanil Use in Anaesthesia and Critical Care: Basic Science Tutorial 342
Remifentanil Use in Anaesthesia and Critical Care: Basic Science Tutorial 342
Edited by
Dr. Alex Konstantatos
Correspondence to atotw@wfsahq.org 29th Nov 2016
QUESTIONS
Before continuing, try to answer the following questions. The answers can be found at the end of the article, together
with an explanation. Please answer True or False:
2) Regarding target controlled infusions (TCI) of remifentanil and Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA):
a. The Marsh model is used to predict target organ concentrations of remifentanil
b. The only patient specific data required for the TCI pump are height, weight and gender
c. Remifentanil use is associated with a lower propofol requirement during TIVA
-1
d. The effect site concentration of remifentanil should be kept between 2-12micrograms per ml (mcg.ml ) for
intraoperative analgesic maintenance
e. The bolus dose of remifentanil delivered is three to four times greater with plasma-site targeting (Cpt)
compared to effect-site targeting (Cet)
Ester
group
Despite being broken down by esterases, remifentanil can be used safely in patients with pseudocholinesterase
1
deficiency . Its major metabolite, remifentanil acid, undergoes renal excretion and accumulates in patients with reduced
1,2
renal function . Despite this, the dosing of remifentanil does not need to be adjusted for renal dysfunction as
1,2
remifentanil acid is almost entirely inactive .
Remifentanil’s side effect profile is similar to that of other opioids (Figure 2).
When comparing remifentanil to other short acting opioids (fentanyl, alfentanil and sufentanil), it is associated with
3 3
deeper anaesthesia and analgesia intra-operatively . This manifests as a lower blood pressure and heart rate . Higher
3
doses of remifentanil are associated with an increased risk of hypotension and bradycardia as well as apnoea . It is
prudent to have vasopressors and anticholinergics to hand when using remifentanil.
4
High intra-operative doses of remifentanil have been associated with post-operative hyperalgesia , although this may be
-1
due in-part to inadequate provision of post op-analgesia. As a guide, morphine (0.15–0.3mg.kg ) or alternative, should
be given at least 30 minutes before stopping remifentanil to allow it time to reach peak effect. Despite the occasional use
3
of rescue analgesia, naloxone is less likely to be needed following intraoperative remifentanil use . The incidence of
nausea and vomiting remains similar to other short acting opioids, however this appears to be less common when using
remifentanil as part of a Total Intravenous Anaesthesia (TIVA) technique. Post-operative shivering is twice as likely to
3
occur with remifentanil .
Minto Model
Target controlled infusion (TCI) pumps adjust the rate of a drug infusion to achieve a steady effect site concentration
taking into account the known pharmacokinetics of the drug and physical characteristics of the patient. The Minto model,
named after one of its developers, Dr. Charles Minto, is a model for predicting the concentration of remifentanil in plasma
5
and the effect site. While more accurate models exist (the Minto model can over-predict by as much as 15% ) its
versatility and wider body of experience have led to it being the most widely used model.
The Minto model is a three-compartment model programmed to target either effect site (Cet) or plasma site (Cpt). The
Cet rate constant (keo) and loss-of-consciousness effect have been derived from electroencephalogram (EEG)
parameters. The initial bolus dose delivered in Cet mode is 3-4x greater when compared to Cpt; this may be associated
with a greater incidence of adverse effects (e.g. chest wall rigidity, bradycardia, apnoea). Often this can be attenuated
by an incremental dosing approach to the desired Cet and the bradycardia can be managed with prophylactic
glycopyrrolate. It is advisable that clinicians unfamiliar with the use of remifentanil TCI use Cpt in preference to Cet.
-1 -1
TCIs, such as the Minto model, give users an advantage over those who use “mcg.kg .min ” as they take a number of
patient characteristics, not just ABW, to predict the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in an individual patient. The Minto
model requires input of patient sex, age, weight (kg) and height (cm); these are used to calculate LBW. It is not
applicable to the majority of paediatric patients with an age cut off of greater than 12 years and a minimum weight of
30kg, and unfortunately there aren’t currently any widely available models for use in children; we suspect this will change
in the future. Age is an important determinant, as the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil vary greatly with age; for example
85 year olds have a 25% reduction in the volume of distribution of remifentanil and two-thirds the clearance rate
6
compared to 20 year olds . Special care must be exercised in frail, elderly patients in order to limit cardiovascular and
-1 -1
respiratory complications. This is more easily achieved using a TCI rather than the simpler mcg.kg .min technique.
Below is a graph and table (figure 3) of remifentanil blood concentrations, as predicted by the Minto model, plotted
against various infusion rates in a 70kg, 170 cm, 40-year-old male.
50
Predicted blood concentration (ng.ml-1)
40
30
Infusion rate Blood concentration
-1 -1 -1
(µg.kg .min ) (ng.ml )
20 0.05 1.3
0.1 2.6
0.25 6.3
10 0.4 10.4
0.5 12.6
1 25.2
2 50.5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Infusion rate (µg.kg-1.min-1)
Figure 3
CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
General Anaesthesia
-1 -1 -1”
Use of remifentanil during general anaesthesia usually requires a Cet of 3-10 ng.ml or about “0.1-0.3 µg.kg .min .
Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring offers an alternative means of titration i.e. if the BIS is outside acceptable ranges (e.g.
-1
<40 or >55) the remifentanil can be titrated up or down by 0.05ng.ml .
Due to its potent respiratory depressant effects, achieving spontaneous ventilation with TCI remifentanil can be
challenging especially with higher rates. If using a TIVA technique combining remifentanil and propofol it is advisable to
Remifentanil is an excellent choice for TIVA; it is safe in malignant hyperthermia and reduces the need for higher doses
7
of propofol due to a synergistic interaction between the two drugs . Dosage of remifentanil depends on clinical
-
experience, user preference and patient/operative factors. As a rough guide, the propofol Cet should be kept at 2-4µg.ml
1 -1
to ensure anaesthesia with remifentanil titrated between 6-12ng.ml (low propofol, high remifentanil) or propofol
-1 -1
concentration 5-6ug.ml with remifentanil 0.5-3ng.ml (high propofol, low remifentanil) for less noxious procedures or
7
in patients where spontaneous breathing is desired . Generally speaking, a low propofol, high remifentanil technique is
8
associated with a more rapid wake-up time . Higher concentrations of remifentanil will be needed in younger, fitter, more
muscular patients; where surgery is more painful and in patients with a history of opioid tolerance, for example in those
with a history of chronic pain or intravenous drug use. With higher concentrations of remifentanil, be mindful that there is
a greater potential for adverse cardiovascular and respiratory effects.
One note of caution: it is important that the IBW weight used in the Minto model at the start of the case closely reflects
that of the patient and is accurate, particularly if they are morbidly obese. IBW is accurately calculated by the TCI pump
using the James equation up to BMI 42 in men and 37 in women, after which a paradoxical decrease in IBW occurs. If
the estimated IBW weight used is too low, this can produce a confusing situation where a patient appears to require
much higher doses of remifentanil than would be expected for a given BIS value and stage of surgery. If this error
occurs, the weight cannot be changed intra-operatively without negating the whole model, so it is important to estimate
IBW weight accurately from the start. This is a controversial area, but the Janmahasatian equation may offer a more
8
accurate estimate for IBW in the morbidly obese, but it is more cumbersome to use . Some clinicians advocate the use of
the Servin formula or Lemmens method which gives an acceptable adjusted IBW compromise, one that is between ABW
9,10
(which may be too high) and IBW (which may be too low) . These formulae are often used in propofol TCI models but
9,10
can also be used with remifentanil . It is also important, where possible, to ensure that a patient has a recent, accurate
ABW measured preoperatively, rather than relying on any estimated weights given, which can be notoriously inaccurate.
8,9,10
Summary of the various formulae used to calculate IBW or LBW (for reference) (all weights in kg) :
11
Remifentanil has a relatively short context-sensitive half-time of only 3 to 4 minutes . Clinically it takes about 6-12
minutes before a patient will resume spontaneous ventilation after remifentanil is stopped or reduced to low Cet
-1
(approximately 2.5ng.ml ). Numerous factors will influence this, such as the Cet at the time of turning off the infusion and
the presence of other respiratory depressant drugs. It is important to consider these facts when timing wake up to ensure
patients breathe and emerge from anaesthesia in a timely and appropriate manner at the end of surgery. This
predictable property makes remifentanil useful for longer operations, for patients in whom rapid wake-up times are
desirable e.g. post-neurosurgery, in obese patients, or when post-operative respiratory depression needs to be avoided,
for example obstructive sleep apnoea.
-1
Remifentanil has been described as part of a modified rapid sequence induction (RSI) (Cet 4-6ng.ml ) in combination
with an induction agent (ketamine, thiopentone or propofol) and suxamethonium or rocuronium.
1. In those with abnormal sensitivity to muscle relaxants e.g. allergy, myasthenia gravis, malignant hyperthermia etc.
2. Where assistance of nerve stimulators is desirable e.g. for monitoring facial nerve function during mastoid/parotid
surgery or if planning a regional block immediately after induction
3. Where avoidance of incomplete reversal or recurisation is desirable
4. Less risk of awareness.
G Wait for approximately 3 minutes This allows the remifentanil and volatile
agent or TIVA time to take effect and will
make intubation smoother.
If using BIS it usually takes this long for the
BIS to reach <40
Treat any hypotension with vasopressor –
rarely needed
H Intubate as normal The patient rarely coughs, particularly if
also using TIVA, where it is extremely
unlikely. However, if the patient has a large
muscle mass or is a smoker it might be
prudent to spray the vocal cords with
lidocaine and wait before instrumenting the
airway to avoid coughing. Increasing the
remifentanil Cet first ± additional doses of
propofol often settles this situation quickly.
The intubating conditions should be
adequate in most cases to intubate easily
without muscle relaxant. If despite these
measures, in the rare occurrence where
coughing were to persist or if the
anaesthetist were faced with a difficult
airway, it may be more appropriate to
abandon this technique and use a rapidly
acting muscle relaxant to assist intubation,
if deemed clinically appropriate.
Figure 4. Suggested intubation protocol using remifentanil without muscle relaxant
Remifentanil crosses the placental barrier however it is rapidly metabolized and redistributed by the foetus, even in the
13
pre-term . Remifentanil has a greater depressant effect on maternal respiratory function and consciousness than other
opioids; this needs to be explained to parturients and must be vigilantly monitored in a 1:1 fashion by clinicians and
midwives. Constant oxygen saturation monitoring is mandatory and supplemental oxygen and resuscitative equipment
14
must be immediately available together with staff trained in their use . There is no difference in maternal or neonatal
morbidity or mortality when comparing epidural analgesia to remifentanil PCA; however, it is prudent to tell the neonatal
13
team that remifentanil has been used during labour should the baby require any resuscitation .
Remifentanil can also be useful during emergency Caesarian sections to avoid laryngoscopy-induced pressor response
15 -1
in eclamptic patients . Aiming for Cet 4-6ng.ml should be sufficient to achieve this as part of a RSI technique. Single
-1
intravenous boluses of remifentanil (0.6-1.3µg.kg ) have also been described, but this warrants caution, as a bolus
method delivers remifentanil much faster than TCI delivery and may lead to adverse cardiovascular effects, truncal
rigidity and apnoea.
Our recipe for AFOI with remifentanil is shown in Figure 6. Of note, only the sedation for AFOI is covered in this tutorial,
the technique and complexities of AFOI can be found in ATOTW 201.
Conscious-sedation
Remifentanil can be used for many procedures where awake-sedation is required, examples include:
• Simple dental extractions
• Joint / fracture reductions in A+E
• Burns dressing changes
• Awake tracheostomy
• Bronchoscopy
• Adjunct-rescue to partially failed regional block or regional block that is wearing off
Safe use of remifentanil relies on appropriate patient selection. Remifentanil is not suitable for any patient that has a
potentially difficult airway, is morbidly obese, is not starved, or for a potentially prolonged procedure. It also needs to be
9
carried out in a location that is equipped to deal with any complications and have full AAGBI monitoring and
resuscitation kit available. There are two schools of thought when it comes to providing supplemental oxygen during
conscious-sedation – on the one hand providing a reservoir of oxygen in the lungs is useful in the event of any airway or
breathing problems. On the other hand, an early fall in SpO2 helps to identify a patient who is over-sedated, allowing the
remifentanil to be reduced or stopped more rapidly and the patient encouraged to breathe.
Our recipe for conscious-sedation is essentially the same as steps A-D of the AFOI recipe above (Figure 6), however we
will reiterate that this must not be rushed – allow at least 2-3 minutes for the patient to respond to any dose increases.
Avoid uncontrolled boluses as they can result in severe bradycardias and apnoeas, particularly in adults. Don’t forget
prophylactic glycopyrrolate. Ensure that the patient’s IBW weight used in the Minto model is accurate.
• Rapid offset allowing for earlier neurological assessment during sedation holds.
• Profound respiratory depression helping to avoid patient-ventilator dysynchrony – less of an issue with modern
ventilator modes.
• Very short context-sensitive half-life and minimal accumulation (unlike alfentanil or morphine) –ideal for
2
resuming spontaneous breathing rapidly .
• No need to dose-adjust in chronic or acute kidney injury (AKI) – offset times are approximately twice as long in
2
moderate-severe renal impairment however as the difference is only 16.5 mins this is not usually significant .
• More predictable offset times particularly in patients with multi-organ dysfunction.
Since remifentanil is now more readily available the costs associated with its use have dropped significantly such that the
cost of a 24-hour infusion of remifentanil is comparable to that of a 24-hour infusion of alfentanil. (UK prices; Remifentanil
19
= £5.72 for 2mg, Alfentanil = £3.20 for 5mg ). In our practice, remifentanil is used first line with propofol for
analgesia/sedation on the ICU.
Disadvantages to using remifentanil in the intensive care setting can be safely managed and should not discourage use.
These disadvantages include:
• Potential for hyperalgesia and withdrawal following cessation of remifentanil infusion, warranting the use of
post-remifentanil analgesia/opiate to be in place prior to dose reduction.
Remifentanil is less suitable for patients who do not have a secure airway, i.e. endotracheal tube. However, if patients
are selected carefully and as experience grows, use in critical care patients without an endotracheal tube is likely to
increase, for example, in aiding patient compliance with non-invasive ventilation, to provide optimal analgesia for brief
dressing changes or turns and to provide better analgesia during invasive procedures.
-1 -1
Suggested infusion rates for a continuous infusion of remifentanil on the ICU would be 0.1 – 0.15µg.kg .min (6 –
-1
9ng.mL ) in ventilated patients to run alongside a propofol infusion. In non-ventilated patients, a remifentanil infusion of
-1 -1
0.05-0.1µg.kg .min may be more appropriate depending on patient factors. Protocol guided use of a remifentanil in
intensive care, may allow safe nurse-led dosing and weaning.
3. Ensure you have reliable IV access and infusion pumps and change syringes promptly – the rapid offset of
remifentanil can be problematic if an infusion finishes unexpectedly.
4. Remove/change IV sets and flush cannulas at the end of the operation to avoid inadvertent doses in recovery,
or worse, back on the ward.
5. Be patient and titrate slowly when using remifentanil for conscious sedation, including AFOI. Impatience is likely
to cause more side effects.
SUMMARY
Remifentanil is an excellent, versatile drug with many possibilities for use within anaesthesia and critical care. Through
education and appropriate use, remifentanil has the potential to significantly improve the conduct of cases and ultimately
the quality of care experienced by our patients.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
2. Regarding target controlled infusions of remifentanil and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA):
a. False: The Minto model is used for remifentanil TCI whereas the Marsh model is used for propofol TCI
b. False: Age is also required for the Minto model
c. True: Remifentanil exhibits synergism with propofol allowing lower propofol concentration during TIVA
-1 -1)
d. False: It should be kept between 2 – 8 nanograms per ml (ng. ml ) not micrograms per ml (µg.ml
e. False: The bolus dose delivered with effect-site targeting (Cet) is 3-4 times greater when compared to
plasma-site targeting (Cpt)
1. Egan TD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil: an update in the year 2000. Current Opinion
in Anaesthesiology. 2000, 13:449-455.
2. Breen D, Wilmer A, Bodenham A, Bach V, Bonde J, Kessler P, Albrecht S, Shaikh S. Offset of pharmacodynamic
effects and safety of remifentanil in intensive care unit patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Critical
Care. 2004, 8:R21-R30.
3. Komatsu R, Turan AM, Orhan-Sungur M, McGuire J, Radke OC, Apfel CC. Remifentanil for general anaesthesia:
a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 1266-1280.
4. Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients after surgery: a systematic review and a meta-
analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2014; 112(6): 991 – 1004.
5. Mertens MJ, Engbers FHM, Burm AGL, Vuyk J. Predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion of
remifentanil during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. British Journal or Anaesthesia 2003; 90(2): 132-141.
6. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD et. al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86(1): 10-23.
7. Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Engbers FH, Burm AG, Bovill JG, Vuyk J. Propofol reduces perioperative remifentanil
requirements in a synergistic manner: response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil-propofol
interactions. Anesthesiology. 2003; 99(2): 347-59.
8. Tahari AK, Chien D, Azadi JR, et al. Optimum Lean Body Formulation for Correction of Standardised Uptake
Value in PET Imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2014; 55: 1-4
9. Albertin A, Poli D, La Colla L, et al. Predictive performance of ‘Servin’s formula’ during BIS-guided propofol-
remifentanil target-controlled infusion in morbidly obese patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2007; 98(1): 66-
75
10. Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Bernstein DP. Estimating ideal body weight – a new formula. Obesity Surgery. 2005;
15(7): 1082-3
11. Milne SE, Kenny GNC, Schraag S. Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia. British
Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003; 90(5): 623-9
12. Checketts MR, Alladi R, Furguson K et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and
recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Published: December 2015.
13. Freeman LM, Bloemenkamp KW, Franssen MT et al. Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus
epidural analgesia in labour: randomized multicenter equivalence trial. British Medical Journal. 2015;350:h846
14. Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, van der Linden PD, Stienstra R. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of
patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009; doi:
10.1093/bja/aep359
15. Yoo KY, Kang DH, Jeong H, Jeong CW, Choi YY, Lee J. A dose-response study of remifentanil for attenuation of
the hypertensive response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in severely preeclamptic women undergoing
caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. International journal of obstetric anaesthesia. 2013; 22: 10-18.
16. Girard T, Kress J, Fuchs B, Thomason J, Schweickert W, Pun B et al, Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation
and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing
Controlled trial): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371: 126-134.
17. Reade MC, Finfer S. Sedation and delirium in the Intensive Care Unit. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;
370: 444-54.
18. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium
in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 41: 263-306.
19. Paediatric Formulary Committee. BNF for Children September 2016. London: BMJ Group, Pharmaceutical Press,
and RCPCH Publications; 2016
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of
this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/