SBM Level of Practice Template

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

SBM VALIDATION FORM

Name of School _______________________________________________ ____________________________________


School ID ________________________________________________ __________________________________
Name of School H ________________________________________________
Designation ________________________________________________
SBM VALIDATION FORM
Name of School District
I - PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT ( 60%)
Thematic Area Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Computation/Rating Results
Enrolment Increase % of Inc
Baseline
1 - Marginal: At least 1% increase (0.01-3.0%)
Access SY 2016 - 17: #DIV/0! 2 - Average: At least 3%
SY 2017 - 18: #DIV/0! increase (3.01-5%) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
( 25% ) 3 - High: At least 5% increase (5.0% - up)
SY 2018 - 19: #DIV/0!
Ave. % of Increase #DIV/0!
Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR ) % of Dec. 1 - Marginal: At least 2% decrease (0.01%-2%)
2 - Average: At least 4% decrease
(40% ) Baseline (2.01-4.0%) 3 - High: Has 0
SY 2016 - 17: 0 DR or more than 4% decrease (4.01%-up)
SY 2017 - 18: 0
SY 2018 - 19: #DIV/0!
Ave. % of Decrease 0
1 - Marginal: At least 1% increase (0.01-3%) #DIV/0!
Completion Rate ( CR ) % of Inc 2 - Average: At least 3% #DIV/0!
Baseline increase (3.01-5%) 3 - High:
Has 5% increase or at least (5.01%-up)
SY 2016 - 17: #DIV/0!
SY 2017 - 18: #DIV/0!
SY 2018 - 19: #DIV/0!

Ave. % of Increase #DIV/0!


AVERAGE
Quality NAT MPS NAT Average/SMEA
( 35% ) Baseline
1 - Marginal: 50% below
SY 2014 - 15: 2 - Average: 51-75%
3 - High: #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
SY 2015 - 16: 76-100%
SY 2016 - 17:
Ave. % #DIV/0!
Sub - total #DIV/0!
Interpretation #DIV/0!
Final Rating (PI) 60% #DIV/0!
Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of " Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
II - SBM Assessment Scores ( 40%)
SBM Principles Weight Average Rating (WAR) Cumulative Scores of Validators per Results
Principle
Leadership 0.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Curriculum & Learning 0.3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Accountability 0.25 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Resource Management 0.15 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Sub-total 100% #DIV/0!
Final Rating (40%) #DIV/0!

Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description


0.50 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

III - FINAL RATING


Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance Improvement 0.6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 0.4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
TOTAL 100 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Interpretation SBM Level of Practice #DIV/0!

Description of SBM Level of Practice Numerical Rating Scale Description SBM Level of Practice
0.50 - 1.49 Developing Level I
1.50 - 2.49 Maturing Level II
2.50 - 3.00 Advanced Level III
CONFORMED BY:

__________________________
School Head
VALIDATED
BY:
SBM TASK
FORCE

_________________________ __________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________


SBM Validator SBM Validator SBM Validator SBM Validator

SBM Coordinator Chief, SGOD


ALFREDO B. GUMARU, Jr.,EdD., CESO VI
Schools Division Superintendent
SBM SCORING SHEET (40%)

Name of School District

Weighted
Average
Principles Indicators TOTAL
Rating
% Average
Rating (WAR)
II - VALIDATED SBM PRACTICE
1. Leadership & Governance
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Rating 0 #DIV/0! .30 #DIV/0!
(Indicate 0,1,2, or 3)
2. Curriculum and Instruction
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4.a 2.5 2.6.a 2.7.a
Rating 0 #DIV/0! .30 #DIV/0!
(Indicate 0,1,2, or 3)
3. Accountability and Continuous Improvement
3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5
Rating 0 #DIV/0! .25 #DIV/0!
(Indicate 0,1,2, or 3)
4. Management of Resources
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5
Rating #DIV/0! .15
(Indicate 0,1,2, or 3) 0 #DIV/0!
TOTAL OF W.A.R #DIV/0!
Validated SBM Practice (Total of WAR x 0.4) #DIV/0!

You might also like