5/20/2021 Print Article

The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/pri…

Print Article Close Window

Science News Online

Week of Feb. 17, 2001; Vol. 159, No. 7

Into the Mystic

Scientists confront the hazy realm of spiritual enlightenment

Bruce Bower

After spending 8 years training in the meditative practices of Zen Buddhism, neurologist James H. Austin spent a
sabbatical year from 1981 to 1982 at the London Zen Center. On a pleasant March morning, while waiting for a subway
train on a surface platform and idly glancing down the tracks toward the Thames River, Austin got his first taste of spiritual
enlightenment.

Instantly, the panorama of sky, buildings, and water acquired a sense of what he calls "absolute reality, intrinsic rightness,
and ultimate perfection." He suddenly shed his formerly unshakable assumption that he was an individual, separated from
the rest of the world by a skin suit. The sky and river remained just as blue, the buildings just as gray and dingy, yet the
loss of an "I-me-mine" perspective imbued the view with an extraordinary emptiness, he says.

Within seconds, other insights dawned. These included the notion that Austin had experienced an eternal state of affairs,
had nothing more to fear, couldn't possibly articulate what had happened, and felt a rush of mental release that impelled
him to take himself less seriously.

In Zen and the Brain (1998, MIT Press), Austin described how this brief experience spurred him to investigate brain
processes that underlie spiritual or mystical encounters.

Austin's fellow neurologists haven't taken his approach either to heart or to brain. The harsh reality of science is that those
who study mysticism and meditation rarely hear the sound of even one hand clapping among their colleagues, to
paraphrase a Zen saying.

Austin's Zen instructor told him that although many people attain what she called "moments of no-I," such experiences
seem incomprehensible to those who haven't had them. For scientists, creatures of the rational thinking embraced by the
17th-century Enlightenment, claims of mystical enlightenment have long smacked of self-deception, gullibility, mental
disorder, charlatanism, or all of the above.

However, a small band of researchers has begun to probe the nature of mystical experiences and other extraordinary
psychological happenings. They've issued a manifesto of sorts in Varieties of Anomalous Experience (2000, American
Psychological Association). The book explores scientific evidence on altered states of consciousness associated with
mystical experiences, near-death incidents, alien-abduction reports, and other so-called anomalous events.

The new book?edited by Etzel Cardeņa of the University of Texas Pan American in Edinburg, Steven J. Lynn of the State
University of New York at Binghamton, and Stanley Krippner of the Saybrook Graduate School in San Francisco?doesn't
take an X-Files approach to this material. The three psychologists see no reason to assume that supernatural worlds and
people-nabbing extraterrestrials exist outside the minds of people who report them.

Instead, the three academics want to launch a science to study the characteristics of human consciousness that make
mystical experience possible. Their focus on a spectrum of conscious states defies the mainstream-neuroscience notion
that there's a single type of awareness, which is either on or off, as if controlled by a light switch. Conscious experience
instead comes with a dimmer switch that varies in sweep and intensity from one person to another and gets wired up
mainly by cultural forces, in their view.

Psychologist William James said much the same in The Varieties of Religious Experience, first published in 1902. The title
of the new volume pays homage to James' book.

"Anomalous experiences aren't just reported by people on the fringe [of society] or who have mental or neurological
disorders," Cardeņa says. "Let's not renounce mystical experience as inherently impossible to study scientifically."

Mystical experiences

Although mystical experiences can't easily be diced up and quantified, they affect a surprisingly large number of people.
National surveys in the United States and England find that roughly one-third of adults say that they've had, for example, a

web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 1/7
5/20/2021 Print Article
moment of sudden religious awakening or felt close to a powerful, spiritual force that seemed to lift them out of themselves.

Such experiences may extend far back into human prehistory. According to archaeologists, cave and rock art from Africa to
Australia depicts shamans' supernatural encounters, which occurred during conscious states achieved through chanting,
dancing, hallucinogenic drugs, or other means (SN: 10/5/96, p. 216). In traditional societies, shamans act as spiritual
leaders and healers.

"Mystical experiences occur on a continuum," says psychologist David M. Wulff of Wheaton College in Norton, Mass. "Even
if they're not religiously inspired, they can be striking, such as the transcendent feelings musicians sometimes get while
they perform. I have colleagues who say they've had mystical experiences, although they have various ways of explaining
them."

In Varieties of Anomalous Experience, Wulff reviews current scientific evidence and theories about mystical experience. He
defines such events as those that deviate sharply from a person's ordinary state of awareness and leave the person with
an impression of having encountered a higher reality. Mystical encounters are rare and fleeting, yet they stand out as
defining moments in the lives of those who have them, Wulff says.

They can include a sense of existing in a unitary place outside of space and time or feeling immersed in a kind of objective
or ultimate reality that eludes verbal description. For many people having mystical experiences, physical objects recede
from view in the wake of feelings of peace, joy, and having encountered the sacred or divine, Wulff reports.

The most systematic scientific study of how mystical experience alters people's lives will probably never be replicated. In
1966, Berkeley, Calif., physician Walter Pahnke randomly selected half of a group of 20 Protestant seminarians and gave
them the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin before the entire group listened to a radio broadcast of a Good Friday service.
Those who didn't receive psilocybin got a B vitamin that caused the skin to flush, thus serving as a placebo.

After the service, those who ingested psilocybin reported having had experiences resembling those of classic mystics, such
as a feeling of oneness with God or ecstatic visions. The B vitamin group recalled more mundane reactions. Immediately
afterward, participants learned whether they had received drug or placebo.

Six months later, the researcher surveyed the participants. After 25 years, another researcher contacted seven of those
who had received psilocybin and nine who had gotten the placebo. In both follow-ups, members of the psilocybin group
cited many more positive changes in their attitudes and behavior that they attributed to the Good Friday broadcast than
placebo-group members did.

Pahnke's work suggests that healthy people who are open to mystical experiences and have them in supportive situations
enjoy lasting, positive aftereffects, Wulff notes.

In other situations, he points out, mystical encounters can turn sour. For example, in Varieties of Religious Experience,
James cited the writings of English poet John Addington Symonds in which he described periodic "moods" resembling
mystical experiences, complete with loss of a sense of self and obliteration of space and time. But the poet reported
dreading these moods.

In contrast, some people stage mystical states for their own ends. James characterized most self-proclaimed mystics as
superficial and petty but thought that a small number of people possess mind-altering qualities "indispensable to the world's
welfare."

In the past 20 years, investigations of epilepsy patients have linked reports of mystical and paranormal experience and
religious preoccupation to bursts of electrical activity in the brain's temporal lobes. A novel written by Mark Salzman, Lying
Awake (2000, Knopf), revolves around a nun who fears that medical treatment for her temporal lobe epilepsy will also wipe
out her vivid religious visions.

In How We Believe (2000, W.H. Freeman and Co.), Michael Shermer of Occidental College in Los Angeles speculates that
many religious visionaries and founders of major religions may have had temporal-lobe seizures that jump-started their
mystical journeys.

Whatever happened inside the skulls of the ancient mystics, most people today who report mystical and so-called peak
experiences don't have brain or mental ailments, Austin says.

Some people consider the hallucinations and altered thinking of schizophrenia as akin to mystical visions. But this mental
disorder exhibits only a superficial similarity to mystical experiences, Austin contends. Consider that schizophrenia lasts for
decades, disrupts psychological development, heightens one's sense of self and isolation, and often includes the torment
of being berated by imaginary voices?opposite extremes of mystics' reports of their transcendence.

Neither schizophrenia nor mystical experience has been comprehensively explained, Wulff maintains, although theories
abound. Sigmund Freud viewed mystical reports as a sign of a person's regression to an earlier stage of development.

web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 2/7
5/20/2021 Print Article

Freud's psychoanalytic disciple Carl Jung described mystical experience as a positive process springing from a shared,
unconscious reservoir of human experiences and themes.

In the 1960s, humanistic psychologist Abraham Maslow proposed a hierarchy of "self-actualization" that was topped off by
having peak experiences of ecstatic fusion with the world. Lower in the hierarchy are experiences that psychologists now
refer to as "flow" and attribute to creativity.

Some researchers argue that mystical experiences, from Zen enlightenment to born-again religious conversions, sprout
from the types of mental errors that people commit in experiments that probe logical thinking. Examples include seeing
what one expects to see and assuming that random events are connected and have meaning.

These theories don't attempt to explain why some individuals have more mystical experiences than others do or how
culture and ritual behavior shape such events, Wulff says. "There does seem to be an innate capacity in the human brain
for having mystical experiences that needs to be explored," he remarks.

Deep hypnosis

People who enter deep hypnotic states with great ease offer valuable opportunities for studying mystical experiences, in
Cardeņa's view. Deep hypnosis typically triggers sensations of merging with a bright light, becoming one with the world,
and other responses that correspond with those in descriptions of near-death experiences and of shamans' activities in
traditional societies, the Texas psychologist says.

Hypnosis inspires much controversy in scientific circles. Some psychologists argue that during hypnosis, a person simply
tries to please the hypnotist by responding to his or her suggestions but doesn't enter a new conscious state.

Only a portion of hypnotized people appear to manage their responses in this way, Cardeņa argues. Using in-depth
interviews and self-report questionnaires, psychologist Ronald J. Pekala of Coatesville Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical
Center in West Chester, Penn., has distinguished between people who mainly react to a hypnotist's suggestions and those
who rapidly enter deep hypnotic states on their own.

Some individuals in the latter group are especially fantasy-prone and generate vivid visual images that they can partially
control and remember later. Others, dubbed dissociaters, experience hypnosis in a different way. Their sense of self or
personality changes in ways that are profoundly meaningful, they say during hypnosis, but that they forget immediately
afterward.

In a study of 12 highly hypnotizable college students, Cardeņa told each of them to go into a deep hypnotic state as he
counted from 1 to 30. Within about 15 minutes, they all began to report altered states of awareness that included
sensations of floating, flying, and becoming separate from their physical bodies. They recalled encountering a limitless sea
or other unusual worlds, experiencing sounds as colors or other strange sensory mixes, existing outside time and space,
uniting with a bright light, and reaching enormous mental calm.

Their descriptions of deep hypnosis contain many of the themes found in shamans' "soul journeys," Cardeņa asserts.
Shamans' soul journeys typically include vivid flights or falls through openings in the earth. The shaman then reaches a
culturally defined supernatural world where he contacts spiritual allies for various purposes.

In traditional societies, people often prize personal reflection in semiconscious states. Shamans represent a small minority
of people best able to enter and control altered states of consciousness (SN: 9/25/99, p. 205).

However, the experiences of highly hypnotizable dissociaters more closely resemble what happens in spirit possessions,
as experienced by shamans and others in traditional cultures, Cardeņa says. Spirit possessions usually don't include vivid
sights. Instead, the practitioner feels dizzy, overcome by a perceived change of body or self, and pressed down by a weight
on the shoulders frequently interpreted as a spirit's presence. The visited person remembers little of what transpired during
a possession.

"The parallels between shamanic and deep hypnotic phenomena strongly suggest that there is a universal disposition to
having extraordinary experiences," Cardeņa contends.

Dismissing the mystical

Cognitive and brain scientists appear more inclined to dismiss the mystical realm than to study it. "There's nothing in our
conception of what a human is that allows this stuff to fit in," comments psychologist Eleanor Rosch of the University of
California, Berkeley.

Austin suspects that a better understanding of brain areas that contribute to the individual notion of self will lead to insights
about spiritual enlightenment. Parts of the cortex and the inner brain, including the thalamus and the amygdala, work
together to generate each person's sense of "I-me-mine," he theorizes. During mystical or spiritual episodes, transmission

web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 3/7
5/20/2021 Print Article
of chemical messengers, including consciousness-altering opioids, within this brain system might undergo dramatic
changes.

Rosch, who has studied Buddhist meditation traditions since 1977, takes a more radical stance. She rejects the popular
scientific assumption that the brain somehow weaves together perceptual information emanating from objects and events
that exist independently of perceivers and of each other.

Along with neuroscientist Christine A. Skarda, Rosch turns that theory on its head. People initially perceive the world
through their sensory organs as a seamless whole with no separation of self from surroundings, Rosch and Skarda say. In
a series of operations, the brain combines contrasting elements, such as different wavelength frequencies of light, into
perceptions, such as color, that inform behavior.

As people employ the perceptions that the brain wrests out of a web of interconnected sensations, they become conscious
of looking at the world as separate beings. That's an eminently handy ability, Skarda contends, but it's a creation of the
perceptual system rather than a reflection of an absolute state of affairs.

Much evidence on how brain cells operate can be interpreted within this framework, according to Skarda, who had worked
at the University of California, Berkeley and now studies meditation practices at a Buddhist institute in India.

Skarda's approach suggests that the brain cultivates concepts that can be tailored flexibly to different situations, Rosch
asserts. For instance, the concept of big takes on a different implication when applied to fleas, as opposed to elephants.
And the concept of great, as expressed in the exclamation "Great!" can involve feelings ranging from excitement to disgust,
depending on the situation. A set of conceptual definitions, or representations, in the brain couldn't keep its balance on this
shifting terrain of meaning, Rosch argues.

Moreover, people form these kinds of concepts over a background of nonconceptual thought, she says. Nonconceptual
thinking is often hard to describe in words. Still, it fires up intuition, artistic experiences, and the indescribable feelings
attached to phenomena such as doing complex mathematics, feeling love or grief, and finding spiritual enlightenment.

In fact, Rosch notes, if the brain indeed fashions a sense of self and of external objects from a seamless fabric of
sensations, then the moments of "no-I" that meditators such as Austin ascribe to enlightenment may signal the recovery of
a larger reality, as it's initially picked up by our senses. As Zen practitioners have long held, everyday perception?even
when brokered by tens of billions of brain cells?may be a useful fiction.

Still, even far less provocative approaches to mystical experience draw blank stares from many scientists, Wulff notes. "I
don't think this is likely to become a popular area of research," he says.

Seeds of mystical research, however, may flower as researchers increasingly turn to examine positive aspects of mental
life, such as the nature of happiness, Cardeņa remarks.

"Psychologists haven't really entered into the study of mystical experience, but they're parked just outside the door," he
says.

Letters:

Finally, scientists are exploring the nature of religious experiences. Scientists will soon discover that the final frontiers
of science and the origin of religion are one and the same.

In authentic Zen Buddhism, ultimate reality is that from which all things come and to which all things return.
Astrophysicists are traveling in time to find the beginningless beginning of our universe. The irony is that what
scientists have been searching for is being experienced by people who have no formal scientific training but know
everything about the origin of the universe.

Ellen S. Best and Min Pai

Wellspring Zen Monastery
Pound Ridge, N.Y.

There have been many studies of manic-depressive illness and its relationship to creativity. Many biblical figures with
prophetic and religious vision have been studied as possibly bearing manic-depressive characteristics. People who
have experiences of oneness with the universe often cannot escape profound feelings of connection to something
greater than themselves.

Since so many people have these peak experiences, it would be interesting to answer "Why?" in a scientific manner.
Could there be an explanation that is purely spiritual?

Ruth Housman
Newton Center, Mass.

web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 4/7
5/20/2021 Print Article
The important story "Into the mystic" should have all the facts right. "The most systematic scientific study of. . .mystical
experience" was conducted by Walter Pahnke. But he was a Cambridge (not Berkeley) physician and also a student in
the Ph.D. program at Harvard Divinity School. The year was about 1962 and not 1966.

The 20 seminarians with whom he worked were students at Andover Newton Theological School in Newton, Mass.
The drugs were administered when the students attended a Good Friday service in Marsh Chapel at Boston University,
where Howard Thurman was preaching. The rest of the story is accurate. I was privileged to participate in a separate
session in which Dr. Pahnke administered psilocybin to some faculty members to discover their experiences, as well.

M.B. Handspicker
North Bennington, Vt.

I have out-of-body experiences nearly every night?I dream.

Carl R. Anderson
Bethesda, Md.

In an out-of-body experience, people are aware that their "self" or center of awareness has left the physical body. Lucid
dreaming, which is dreaming while knowing that one is dreaming, is closely related to out-of-body experiences.?B.
Bower

I rather often experienced mystical enlightenment, as Robert Austin described it, when I was jogging regularly. We may
not be able to repeat the psilocybin study of Walter Pahnke, but couldn't we study whether endorphin levels correlate
with these types of mystical feelings and spiritual ideas?

Harold Zeckel
Arlington, Mass.

Some of the scientists of enlightenment contend that innate capacities for mystical experiences need to be explored.
Others appear to be interested in exploring such capacities only as human delusions. Both groups make assumptions
that circumscribe the phenomena they will examine and limit the tools available. These researchers will find what they
set out to find, limited by their assumptions, and they will not take seriously the experiential claims of their subjects.
Their research will not contribute anything of significance unless, perhaps, the scientists seek the experiences for
themselves. But then would that still be "science"?

Barry N. Bishop
Lewisburg, Pa.

References:

Cardeņa, E., S.J. Lynn, and S. Krippner, eds. 2000. Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific
Evidence. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.

Austin, J.H. 1999. Zen and the Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Shermer, M. 2000. How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Skarda, C.A. 1999. The perceptual form of life. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(November/December):79.

Further Readings:

Rosch, E. 1999. Is wisdom in the brain? Psychological Science 10(May):222.

van Quekelberghe, R. and D. Eigner, eds. 1996. Yearbook of Cross-Cultural Medicine and Psychotherapy: Theme
Issue: Trance, Possession, Healing Rituals and Psychotherapy. New York: VWB.

Bower, B. 1999. Slumber's unexplored landscape. Science News 156(Sept. 25):205. Available at
http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc99/9_25_99/bob2.htm.

______. 1996. Visions on the rocks. Science News 150(Oct. 5):216. Available at
http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arch/10_5_96/bob2.htm.

Sources:

James H. Austin
University of Idaho
3890 Moscow Mount Road
Moscow, ID 83843-8113
web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 5/7
5/20/2021 Print Article
Etzel Cardeņa
University of Texas Pan American
Department of Psychology and Anthropology
1201 West University Drive
Edinburg, TX 78539-2999

Stanley Krippner
Saybrook Graduate School
450 Pacific, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94133-4640

Steven Jay Lynn

Department of Psychology
State University of New York, Binghamton
Binghamton, NY 13902

Michael Shermer
History of Science, Technology and Evolutionary Thought
Cultural Studies Program
Occidental College
Los Angeles, CA 90041

Christine Skarda
c/o Drikung Kadyud Institute
P.O. Box Kulhan
Dehra Dun
Upper Pradish 248001
India

David M. Wulff
Department of Psychology
Wheaton College
Norton, MA 02766

Ronald J. Pekala
Coatesville VA Medical Center
West Chester, PA 19320

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20010217/bob7.asp
From Science News, Vol. 159, No. 7, Feb. 17, 2001, p. 104.

MARKETPLACE (Sponsored Links)

Have You Invented Anything?
We have been providing inventor services for over 20
years. Offices nationwide. Free info.
www.InventHelp.com

Instant Savings on an HP Color LaserJet

Printer
$399.99 After $100 Instant Savings on a HP 2605DN
Color LaserJet Printer! Limited time offer!
www.OfficeDepot.com

Instant Savings on a Sony Cyber-shot 8.1

Megapixe...
$299.99 After $50 Instant Savings. Limited time offer
from Office Depot®.
www.OfficeDepot.com

Big Savings on a Lenovo™ Widescreen

Notebook!
$629.99 After $50 Instant & $220 Mail-in Savings.
Limited time offer from Office Depot®.
www.OfficeDepot.com
web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 6/7
5/20/2021 Print Article

Copyright (c) 2001 Science Service. All rights reserved.

web.archive.org/web/20071217191911/http://www.sciencenews.org/scripts/printthis.asp?clip=%2Farticles%2F20010217%2Fclip_bob7%2Easp 7/7