Complaint For Annulment 15
Complaint For Annulment 15
Complaint For Annulment 15
FERNANDO MARTIN,
Defendant.
x---------------------------------------------------------x
. Sometime in February 2018, Mrs. Victoria Secreto (Respondent) met with was then couple
Sharmaine Mendoza and Val Ibulgar at a restaurant near University of San Agustin. The couple
agreed that they will get Mrs. Secreto as their wedding coordinator for they have known each
other since high school and the fact that Mrs. Secreto is best friends with Ms. Mendoza.
6. On April 8, 2018, the parties executed a contract (Service Agreement) containing the details of
the wedding and the obligations of the parties. The said contract specifically stated the requests
of the Plaintiff as to the materials and designs for the wedding venue, the number of expected
guests, and the venue for the reception and the menu for the catering
1.2 Defendant Fernando Martin,is of legal age, a Filipino, with address at 385
Corinthians Street, Quezon City, where he may be served with pleadings, motions, notices,
2 service. In addition, the contract also provides the Plaintiff’s special request for the cake
paid on or before the date of the wedding which is December 15, 2018.
8. On October 11, 2018, Plaintiff, by the request of Respondent, issued a check containing the
amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php 250, 000) as a down-payment for the said
9. On November 17, 2018, an additional amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php
agreement (MOA), where plaintiff would sell the clinic and its equipment to defendant for Php
15,000,000.00.
2.6 As per the Contract to Sell, payments would be made in four (4) installments, in
The transfer of ownership and the deed of absolute sale would be made upon the last
payment.”
2.7 Defendant paid Php 500,000.00 on 13 February 2009, date of signing of the
MOA, the receipt of which was acknowledged. The next day, 14 February 2009, defendant made
2 However, on November 18, a day after the Respondent accepted the amount, the
Plaintiff received a message on her Facebook account through messenger saying that the
additional amount of money was stolen from her because her bag containing the money was rob
at Robinson’s Jaro. The Plaintiff, being considerate to her best friend, paid the remaining balance
of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php 250, 000) and offered that the Respondent may
make adjustments as to the materials to be used in the venue. In exchange, the Respondent
promised that she will make her bestfriend’s wedding memorable as provided in the conversation
between Plaintiff and Respondent. Copy of the document of the said conversation is attached
11. On December 5, 2018, few days before the wedding, the Plaintiff had difficulty in
contacting her best friend as seen in the messages sent by her through text. Copy of the document
The injured party may choose between the fulfillment and the rescission of
the obligation, with the payment of damages in either case. He may also seek
rescission, even after he has chosen fulfillment, if the latter should become
impossible. However, on December 15, 2018, when the Plaintiff arrived at Jaro
Cathedral, she was surprised that there were no flowers inside the church as if
there was no wedding on that day. The Plaintiff, walked down the aisle with tears
and disappointments. Despite the incident, the wedding ceremony continued.
15. However, when the newly-wed and the guests arrived at reception,
there were only five (5) lechon manok on the table and nothing else. Forcing the
bride and groom buy food for their guests at McDonald’s Atria. Copy of pictures
of lechon manok and the newly-wed buying at McDonald’s is attached as Annex
“F” and Annex “G”, respectively.
16. More disappointments followed when the cake arrived at the venue
and it was less and different than what was stipulated in the contract. The worst
was the first layer of the said cake is made from stryofoam covered by red
fondant. Copy of the picture of the said cake is attached hereto as Annex “I”.
The court shall decree the rescission claimed, unless there be just cause
authorizing the fixing of a period.
This is understood to be without prejudice to the rights of third persons
who have acquired the thing, in accordance with Articles 1385 and 1388 and the
Mortgage Law. (1124)”
parties fail to comply with their respective obligations, the party who failed to
comply will be liable to pay thirty percent (30%) liquidated damages plus other
damages.”
3.5 Aisa Sarmiento, in exercise of its obligation under the Contract to Sell,
turned over the clinic to Fernando Martin after he paid the second installment, totaling his
payment to Php3,000,000.00.
3.6 On the other hand, Fernando Martin stopped payment after the second installment
3.7 Therefore, pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 1169 of the Civil Code, the effects of
delay in the delivery of an obligation or morasolvendi is the breach or violation of the obligation.
There has been no breach on the agreement on the part of AisaSarmiento, the breach herein was
3.8 In connection with the foregoing, it is of no doubt that Aisa Sarmiento is the
injured party of the herein case who can apply the provisions of Article 1191 of the Civil Code
and Section 3 of the Contract to Sell, which was stated earlier. Aisa Sarmientois entitled to
demand specific performance against Fernando Martin to pay the remaining balance of the
purchase price plus damages for the latter’s failure to comply obligation.
4.1 Aisa Sarmiento respectfully repleads the allegations of the foregoing paragraphs
by reference.
4.3 Thus, Aisa Sarmiento has the right to thirty percent (30%) liquidated damages,
pursuant to Section 3 of the Contract to Sell which was cited earlier, and to Article 1226 of the
Civil Code.
5.1 Aisa Sarmiento respectfully repleads the allegations of the foregoing paragraphs
by reference.
proceedings to enforce any of its rights hereunder, the party at fault will pay the
other reasonable compensation for its expenses and charges, including attorney’s
5.3 Fernando Martin is obligated to pay Aisa Sarmiento for any expenses, charges,
attorney’s fees, litigation expenses and costs of the suit, should Aisa Sarmiento resort to judicial
5.4 Based on the Contract to Sell, Fernando Martin should be made to pay Aisa
Sarmiento the amount of P200,000.00 by way of attorney’s fees, costs and litigation expenses.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, Aisa Sarmiento respectfully prays that this Honorable Court:
1. On the First Cause of Action, order Fernando Martin to pay the amount of Php
2. On the Second Cause of Action, order Fernando Martin to pay the penalty cost of 30%
3. On the Third Cause of Action, order Fernando Martin to pay the sum of Php
200,000.00 as and for attorrney’s fees and expenses of litigation, plus costs.
Aisa Sarmiento further prays for such other reliefs as may be just and equitable in the
premises.
By: