AVAILABILITY AND USE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR

TEACHING BUSINESS STUDIES IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN

RUIRU DISTRICT KIAMBU COUNTY,KENYA

BY

OBADIAH PAMELA KERUBO

E55/CE/13690/2009

THESIS SUBMITTEDIN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE

REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD DEGREE OFMASTER OF
EDUCATION (COMMUNICATION AND TECHNOLOGY) IN
THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION KENYATTA UNIVERSITY.

JUNE 2015
 DECLARATION

I confirm that this research thesis is my original work and has been not been presented
in any other university/institution for certification. The thesis has been completed by
referenced work duly acknowledged. Where text, data, graphics, pictures or tables
havebeen borrowed from any other works- including the internet, the sources are
specificallyaccredited through referencingin accordance with anti-plagiarism
regulations.

Signature ................................................ Date ............................................

Pamela.K.Obadiah.

E55/CE/13690/2009.

This thesis has been submitted for appraisal with our approval as the university
supervisors.

Signature.................................................... Date..................................

Dr W. Kerich.
Department of Educational Communication
and Technology.
Kenyatta University.

Signature....................................................... Date........................................
Dr.D.Oludhe
Department of Educational Communication
and Technology
Kenyatta University.

ii
 DEDICATION

This work is dedicated to my husband Fred AkeyaMagare, my childrenLilian,

Divinah, Shawn, and Kate.

iii
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This thesis was written with the cooperation of many individuals to whom I owe a

great deal of credit and wishes to express sincere appreciation.

My profound gratitude to God the almighty, who has enabled me to come this far.

Most sincere gratitude goes to my supervisors Dr Wilson Kerich and Dr.David

Oludhe for their advice and untiring support, their patience and willingness to read my

work despite their busy schedules.

My thanks also go to the head teachers, Business Studies teachers and students in the

selected secondary schools in Ruiru district for their cooperation during data

collection.

I must offer my sincere appreciation and gratitude to my husband Fred

AkeyaMagare, my parents Mr and Mrs Obadiah who encouraged me to study and my

entire family for their patience and understanding during this process. My gratitude

also goes to my fellow students for both material and moral support given during the

study.

iv
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION ...........................................................................................................ii
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................. iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................ iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... v
LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................vii
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... viii
ABBREVIATIONS ACCRONYMS ............................................................................ ix
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... x
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Introduction. ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Background to the Study ...................................................................................... 1
1.3. Statement of the Problem .................................................................................... 6
1.5. Research Objectives ............................................................................................ 7
1.6 Research Questions .............................................................................................. 8
1.7 Significance of the Study ..................................................................................... 8
1.8 Delimitations of the study .................................................................................... 9
1.9 Limitations of the Study....................................................................................... 9
1.10 Assumptions of the Study ................................................................................ 10
1.11 Theoretical Framework .................................................................................... 10
1.12 Conceptual framework .............................................................................. 12
1.13 Operational Definition of terms. ............................................................... 14
CHAPTER TWO ......................................................................................................... 16
LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................ 16
2.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 16
2.2. Meaning of Community Resources .................................................................. 16
2.3. Importance of Community Resources .............................................................. 17
2.4. Methods, procedures, and activities that can be applied in using community
resources .................................................................................................................. 21
2. 5. Extent to which Community Resources have been used in other Countries ... 25
2.6. Related studies on Community Resources ........................................................ 29
2.7.Summery of Review of Related Literature ........................................................ 33
CHAPTER THREE ..................................................................................................... 35
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ....................................................... 35
3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 35
3.2. Research Design................................................................................................ 35
3.2.1 Study Variables ............................................................................................... 35
3.2.2. Location of the study ..................................................................................... 36
3.3 Target Population. .............................................................................................. 36
3.4. sampling techniques and sample size ............................................................... 36
3.4.1. Sampling techniques .................................................................................. 36
3.4.2. Sample size ................................................................................................ 37
3.5. Construction of Research Instruments .............................................................. 37
3.5.1. Interview Schedule for Principals .............................................................. 38
3.5.2. Questionnaires for Teachers ...................................................................... 38
3.5.3. Questionnaire for Students ......................................................................... 38

v
 3.6. The Pilot Study ................................................................................................. 38
3.6.1. Reliability................................................................................................... 39
3.6.2. Validity ...................................................................................................... 39
3.7 Data collection procedure .................................................................................. 39
3.8 Data analysis techniques .................................................................................... 40
3.9. Logistical and ethical considerations ................................................................ 41
CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................ 42
DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION ............................................................. 42
4.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 42
4.2 Teacher's background information..................................................................... 42
4.3. Knowledge of the community. .......................................................................... 47
4.4. Extent to which Community Resources have been used in teaching Business
Studies. ..................................................................................................................... 50
4.6. Report on responses of principals ..................................................................... 59
4.7. Comparison of principals, Business Studies teachers and Students responses. 60
CHAPTER FIVE ......................................................................................................... 63
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................... 63
5.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 63
5.2. Summary of research findings. ......................................................................... 63
5.2. 1.Teachers background information. ............................................................ 63
5.2.2. Availability of Community Resources used in teaching Business Studies.
.............................................................................................................................. 64
5.2.3. Extent to which Community Resources were used in teaching Business
Studies .................................................................................................................. 65
5.2.4. Factors that inhibit the use of community resources in teaching Business
Studies. ................................................................................................................. 65
5.2.5. Intervention measures towards improving use of Community Resources in
teaching Business Studies in secondary schools. ................................................. 66
5.3. Conclusion. ....................................................................................................... 66
5.4. Recommendations ............................................................................................. 67
5.5. Suggestions for further research ....................................................................... 68
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 69
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A .............................................................................................................. 73
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS ....................................................................... 73
APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................. 79
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS ....................................................................... 79
APPENDIX C .............................................................................................................. 82
INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR PRINCIPALS ................................................................. 82
APPENDIX D .............................................................................................................. 84
SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RUIRU 2012 .............................................................. 84
APPENDIX E .............................................................................................................. 85
PROJECTED ESTIMATED BUDGET ...................................................................... 85
APPENDIX F............................................................................................................... 86
TIME SCHEDULE ...................................................................................................... 86

vi
 LIST OF TABLES

Table 4.1 Age of the respondents................................................................................42

Table 4.2Teachers Academic and Professional Qualification....................................43

Table 4.3 Average Class size.......................................................................................44

Table 4.4.Knowledge of the School. ..........................................................................45

Table 4.5. Some of the resources identified near schools by teachers and stud...........46

Table 4.6. Extent to which various methods of teaching using community resources

have been used ............................................................................................................47

Table 4.7 .Frequency to which places of educational value in relation to Business

Studies were visited ....................................................................................................48

Table 4.8 Extent to which resource people were used in teaching Business Studies...49

Table 4.9.Extent to which places/events/activities of educational value in relation to

Business Studies have been used……………………………………………….........54

Table 4.10. Do Business Studies use community resources while teaching?.............57

Table 4.11. Reasons for inadequate use of community resources………………..…..57

vii
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Conceptual framework ..............................................................................12

Figure 4.1 Gender of respondents..............................................................................43

Figure 4.2 Respondents teaching experience ............................................................44

Figure 4.3 Location of the school.............................. ...............................................45

viii
 ABBREVIATIONS ACCRONYMS

GOK: Government of Kenya.

FKE: Federation of Kenyan Employers.

KICD Kenya Institute of Curriculum Developers.

NBFI: Non-Banking Financial Institutions

NSE: Nairobi Stock Exchange

ix
 ABSTRACT

Community resources when used in teaching and learning enhance understanding and
retention. This study examined the availability and use of community resources in
teaching Business Studies in secondary schools in Ruiru District Kiambu County
Kenya. A descriptive research method was adopted. A sample of 10 principals, 10
Business Studies teachers and 100 students was drawn from a target population of
1222 respondents. Data was collected using interview schedule for Principals and
questionnaires were used to collect data from teachers and students. Information was
collected from twenty two secondary schools in Kiambu District. Descriptive
statistics in form of percentages, frequencies, tables and ranks were used to analyse
data. Major finding of this study were that community resources were not regularly
used in Kenyan secondary schools due to constraints of time, finance etc. The study
also revealed that the respondents were conversant with community resources in their
District. From the findings teachers should try as much as possible to use community
resources in teaching Business Studies. This will improve the quality of instruction in
schools and ensure student active involvement in life-like learning activities.

x
 CHAPTER ONE

1.1 Introduction.

This chapter looks at the background to the problem,Statement of the problem,

Purpose of the study, research objectives andquestions, significance of the study,

Delimitations and limitations of the study, assumptions of the study, theoretical and

Conceptualframework andoperational of terms of this study have been defined.

1.2 Background to the Study

It is generally agreed that learners learn best by observing and analysing life

experiences. One of the educational reformers John Commenius who believed in

universal education, was certain that the old restrictions of time and place and

narrowly conceived curriculum concepts should be broken down into content,

teaching and learning resources and activities,Whittich (1967).

Commenius further statedthat breaking down concepts would be best done by giving

students opportunities to voice their own interests, enthusiasms, and curiosities by

seeking answers. This meant observing for themselves the activities of people,

visiting places and manipulating things. Clearly instructional materials add element of

reality by providing such concrete examples.

Instructional materials include print and non-print items that are designed to impart

information to students in the educational process (Bradley, Sankar and Raju 2005).

Among these items are textbooks charts community resources and many more.

1
The use of instructional materials in secondary schools has been widely researched

and findings indicate that the benefits of using them are immense. The integration of

instructional materials in classroom practice is believed to booster the quality of

instruction by fostering student cantered pedagogies (Abdo and Semela 2010).

Furthermore according to Mateer et al (2012), the use of relevant instructional media

in the classroom is invaluable since it engages students, aids their retention of

knowledge, motivates interest in the subject matter and helps to illustrate many

concepts taught.

Ciffone (1998) defines community resources as people, places or things that can be

found in all sectors of the community and can provide teachers with teaching

materials (borrowed or donated), project ideas, guest speakers, field trips, and

community service projects.

Community resources are part of instructional media which can be used in teaching.

When well used community resources can enliven a class, encourage student

participation and help students grasp difficult concepts. The outdoors can be effective

avenue for learners to develop an understanding for basic concepts. These basic

concepts extend far beyond the acquisition of simple facts by including relationship

building, values formation, and increasing sensitivity and awareness of the

environment surrounding the individual, (Ewert, 2006).

Dale (1969), states that full and well-rounded learning should be moved beyond our

school walls and into the community. This is a laboratory which can help to bridge

the gap between what we know and what we do in education. Utilizing the

community and its resources expand the notion of the classroom to include the entire

world of the student, (Sebolt 1972).

2
Olsen (1954) observed that a school cannot be realistic if it is confined to the four

walls of the classroom, library or laboratory. If young people are to develop

understanding, concerns and skills essential in the real improvement of human living,

they must have every opportunity to learn through extensive first hand, problem

solving experience. Books and visual materials are all important, but alone are not

sufficient. That is why the community opens doors for experience between the school

and the community. This can be achieved through the use of resource persons, field

trips, community surveys, work experiences and service projects, and visits to

factories, firms,social agencies and museums.

Dewey (1966) argued that it is the business of the school to set up an environment in

which play and work shall be conducted with reference to facilitating desirable mental

and moral growth. The problem of education is to engage pupils in the activities in

such a way that manual skill and technical efficiency are gained and immediate

satisfaction found in the work. Together with preparation for later usefulness those

things shall be subordinated to education- that is, to intellectual results and the

forming of a socialised disposition.

Brown, Lewis and Harcleroad (1969) called for more planned contacts with adults of

the community since such elderly people open new worlds of experience for learners.

They give an example of Michigan state university which organised a community

resource workshop. It involved more than fifty teachers in a cooperative effort with

twelve local industries and chamber of commerce in learning about the

socioeconomic environment in which they worked. An outgrowth of the workshop

was a booklet describing full details of potential field trip sites in the area.

Participants contacted more than a thousand community leaders (citizens with special

3
talents and skills). Thus many community contacts were made and community

resources explored that were of interest for future use.

Thompson (1981) argues that the community should be a laboratory for study in order

that the content of the curriculum might be more relevant to the lives learners led and

would continue to lead in their community. Some of the earliest community schools in

Africa recognised the need for their teaching staff to be augmented by local people

possessing skills in craft and farming and also traditional history and custom which

the teachers, often draw from distant communities might well possess. Also present

was the idea that children should learn that not all knowledge which was of value was

to be found in textbooks but might also be learned from a storehouse of community

experience.

Julius Nyerere's policy 'education for self-reliance' called for inclusion of practical

activity and productive work into the educational curriculum, not as a punishment but

as an integral part of learning. Linkages between the school and the community were

made by inviting local intellectuals, elders and others to share their knowledge and

experience with the students, (Mbilinyi, 2003).

One of the first advocates for outdoor education we know today was L. B. Sharp in

Ewert(2006) felt that which ought and can be best be taught inside the classrooms

should there be taught, and that which can be best learned through experience dealing

directly with native materials and life situations outside the school should there be

learned.

The nature of business studies offers unique opportunities for resources within the

school community around the environment to be used to enrich students learning. It

is a subject that is concerned with the immediate and the larger environment.

4
Community institutions, people and businesses are rich reservoir of instructional

materials for business studies teachers. The use of community resources in teaching

can make students appreciate the local and international relevance of what they learn

in school while affording them the opportunity to apply business studies theory and

context. This is supported by Chew (2008) who in her study on the development of

localised instructional materials in Hong Kong, came to conclusion that teaching and

learning in business studies could be enhanced to a great extent by using

instructional resources based on local contexts, because such resources would be

more authentic and more relevant to student‟s needs.

Business studies is an applied or vocational subject tailored towards enhancing the

learner‟s capacity and ability for employment in the different sectors of the

economy, both formal and informal. Business studies also aims at equipping the

students with entrepreneurial skills that can consequently encourage and lead to the

realisation of self-employment (GOK Kenya, 2004). Many of these skills can be

achieved by use of community resources.

Every town, whether rural or urban, has placesandopportunities that exist for the

benefit of the community learning. Britain has identified Libraries, parks, hospitals,

town halls that offer potential for exciting learning. Use of Community resources

enables the learners to develop skills in creative thinking, independent enquiry, team

work and effective participation, (Ellis 2009). There are Places in Kenya that offer

opportunities for community teaching which include museums, railway stations, and

factories and so on.

Business studies subject prepares future entrepreneurs who play a big role in

development of the economy.Ouma (2011) observed that Business Studies is an

5
important subject to be taught only in secondary schools colleges and universities

alone. Kenya ought to reverse this trend and start teaching right from primary

schools. We need to teach Business Studiesright from primary school. By using

community resources, schools shall achieve the goals they have set for themselves.

Wanza (2008) in her a study on implementation of the Business Studies curriculum in

public secondary schools in Machakos District, Machakos County, Kenya found that

teaching and learning resources were inadequate for effective implementation of

Business Studies curriculum.

Business Studies is an elective to be selected from a cluster that includes Agriculture,

Computer Studies and Home Science. With the use of community resources learners

will be motivated and may have a positive attitude towards the subject. When students

have interest, they tend to learn the subject materials better. Heightened student

interest in class can lead to more students opting for the subject.

1.3. Statement of the Problem

In spite of the wide recognition of what can be achieved when using community

resources/experiences, research shows that they have not become an integral part of

instruction as one would have hoped. Teachers use only textbooks to provide

instruction and rarely use teaching resources.

Azeb (1975) in her study on use of community resources in elementary schools in

Ethiopia showed that most teachers assigned text books to the class as the main source

from which they obtained their instructional materials.Also a study conducted on

teaching Business Studies in Botswana secondary schools, Sithole (2010) discovered

that out of the total teachers sampled, (68%) had never used local people as guest

6
speakers or resource persons. In a similar study, Mitiale (2011), observed that social

studies teachers in Botswana make insufficient use of instructional materials

The similar finding was observed by Mwangi, (2001) in his study on selection and

utilization of instructional resources by teachers of English in Muranga District. He

found out that most teachers did not recognise the potential of community based

resources such as guest speakers and study tours and that Majority of teachers

depended on textbooks as the main source of information. Some teachers

unquestionably accept the orderly, systematic curriculum plan handed to them by

higher authority, in their classroom teaching.

A lot of research has been done on community resources and their effect on teaching

and learning. Their potential to motivate and engage students may be limited.

However, little has been done to find out the extent community resources have been

used in teaching and learning.

1.4 Purpose of the Study

The purpose of the study was to establish availability, use of community resources

and challenges faced by teachers when using community resources in teaching

Business Studies in Secondary schools in Ruiru District in Kiambu County.

1.5. Research Objectives

The following research objectives guided this study.

i. To find out the different types of community resources in usewhen teaching

Business Studies in secondary schools.

ii. To ascertain how often community resources are used by Business Studies

teachers while teaching.

7
iii. To identify factors that inhibits the use of community resources in teaching

Business Studies at the secondary school level in Ruiru District, Kiambu

County.

iv. To propose intervention measures towards improving use of community

resources in teaching Business Studies in secondary schools.

1.6 Research Questions

The study was guided by the following research questions:

i. What community resources are in use in teaching Business Studies in secondary

schools in Ruiru, Kiambu County?

ii. How often do you use community resources in teaching Business Studies in

secondary schools?

iii. What factors inhibit the use of community resources in teaching Business

Studies in secondary schools?

iv. What intervention measures should be taken towards improving the use of

community resources in teaching Business Studies?

1.7 Significance of the Study

The findings of this study are useful in the following ways.

First the study shouldbe valuable to secondary school Curriculum developers and

planners like Kenya Institute of Curriculum Developers. They will find the

information generated by the study relevant to their short term and long term

educational planning. K.I.C.D. is entrusted with responsibility of implementing the

curriculum.

8
Second the findings are expected to provide useful suggestions to other education

stakeholders like the Ministry of Education in its quest to provide the necessary

resources to implement the curriculum.

And third the findings may further be beneficial to teacher training institutions to

continue to create awareness on the importance of community resources for

teachingespecially in light of lack of finances to obtain expensive resources.

1.8 Delimitations of the study

The following were the delimitations of the study;

1. The study was conducted inRuiru District in Kiambu County, Kenya. The

district was selected because it is located in both urban and rural setting

which is an advantage as it provides opportunities to samplea variety of

community resources.

2. The study focused on both public and private schools. The study involved

Business Studies teachers, Principals of selected schools and Form three students.

1.9 Limitations of the Study

The following were limitations of the study:

The study limited itself to one District. For a more conclusive result rural and urban

districts should have been studied. However it is not possible due to financial and

time required for the study.

9
1.10 Assumptions of the Study

In the study, the following assumptions were made:

1. Community resources enhance learner's performance in Business Studies

because they increase student motivation.

2. Business Studies teachers are conversant with resources found in their local

community that can be used to enhance their lessons.

3. Most Business Studies teachers are aware of the benefits of using community

resources for learning.

1.11 Theoretical Framework

This study is based on constructivism theory of learning. Constructivism draws on the

developmental work of Piaget, Dewey among others. For Dewey knowledge emerges

only from situations in which learners have to draw them out of meaningful

experiences, (Dewey 1966).

Dewey suggested that people learn through authentic experience and reflection. He

believed that learning is propelled by cognitive dissonance rather than reinforcement

(White, 2009). Dewey also believed teaching using lecture, reinforcement or other

externally imposed methods lead to less personally and socially meaningful learning.

He felt real –world, practical problems lead to more experiential and lasting learning.

In his theory of contemporary experiential education, he believed that learning

through direct experience was the strongest form of learning, with an outcome that

also builds a sense of community with the learner, (Ewert 2006).

Students cannot learn by means of rote memorisation they can only learn by "direct

living" where concrete activities are combined with theory. The obvious implication

10
of Dewey's theory is that students must be engaged in meaningful activities that

induce them to apply the concepts they are trying to learn.

A productive constructivist learning consists of learner-centred active instruction. In

such learning, the teacher provides students with experiences that allow them to

hypothesize, predict, manipulate objects, pose questions, etc. By using community

resources, learners are exposed to study experiences that they have already discussed

in the classroom. Community resources bring out realism and they apply the new

knowledge and skill to previous learning. This helps create a restructuring of thought,

(White 2009).

Business studies being a vocational subject should relate theory to practice. It is the

teacher's role to provide the relevant real world experiences and facilitate the whole

process of learning.

11
 1.12Conceptual framework

Conceptual framework shows the relationships between variables in the study

graphically or diagrammatically.

Independent variables Moderating variables Dependent variables

Availability and use of Teacher‟s access and Positive attitude towards
Resource people knowledge Towards Business Studies
Field trips Training Acquisition of knowledge and
Working experiences Attitudes and beliefs skills
Community service Administration support Stimulation of interest in business
projects Student‟s entry behaviour related careers
Documentary materials Improved performance

Source owner

12
The conceptual framework above explains the use of community resources and their

Effect in learning. The framework explains when learners use community resources.

Such as use of field trips there is an expected increased motivation, acquisition of

knowledge and skills and stimulation of interest for natural resource related careers.

Provided the activity is well taught and well-articulated.

The independent variables are: community resources such as resource people, field

trips etc. moderating variable teachers‟ workload and nature of teaching tasks,

teachers attitudes and beliefs, access and knowledge on community resources, school

culture and leadership support in community resource integration. Dependent

variables positive attitude towards Business Studies, acquisition of knowledge and

skills stimulation of interests in business related careers and improved performance.

13
 1.13Operational Definition of Terms.

Availabilityof resource: The resource is present suitable or ready for use.

Business studies: A subject taught in secondary schools on how businesses

work, especially the financial and management aspects.This

will enable the learner to acquire the necessary skills and

abilities required in business operations.

Community resources: These are resources found outside the schools which are used

to facilitate the teaching learning processes. They include

people, places, activities etc.

Learning: The act or process of acquiring knowledge or skill.

Vocational: Relating to, providing or undergoing training in a special skill

to be pursued in a trade.

Resource person: An individual with specialized knowledge or skill that may be

used by teachers and learners to enhance learning. Such

specialist may be brought into the class or the learners may go

out to reach them.

14
Field trips: An excursion by staff and students to a place away from their

normal environment to study at first hand something of interest

or relevance to a course.

Working experiences:A period of work that is designed to encourage reflection on

the experience and to identify the learning that comes from

working

Community service projects: Work without payment that a student does to help their

local community.

Documentary materials: Relates to documents presenting factual material with little

or no fictional additions.

15
 CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Introduction

This chapter is organised under the following headings: Meaning of community

resources, importance of community resources in making learning experiences more

relevant, methods, procedures and activities that can be applied in using community

resources, extent to which community resources have been utilised, related studies

and summery of review of literature.

2.2. Meaning of Community Resources

Whittich (1967) defines community resources as various learning situations through

which pupils come into first hand contact with people, places and all things around

them. It includes visiting organisations, institutions and neighbourhoods or regions of

the community, interviewing public officials and community leaders.

The issue of use of community resources is dynamic and diverse given any country's

economic context. RuiruKiambu County has broad resources. They can be

categorised into three:

 Business units of the economy.

 Resource personnel.

 Social –economic activities.

16
The business units of the economy are made up of a number of players that include

financial service providers (commercial banks and NBFI), insurance companies,

entrepreneurial enterprises, manufacturing sector and the NSE.

The resource personnel in the community context comprises of leaders and

management teams of sectors of the economy in the region, for example business

experts and consultants and analysts.Guest speakers can be anyone from

environmental professionals to student's family members to other community

members.

Social-economic activities engaged in the context of community resources are

business trips, seminars and exhibitions , students visits to business oriented firms and

agencies as well as engagement of public speeches, talks, forums in teaching and

learning of business studies. These activities are essential in equipping the students

with skills and knowledge in learning , observing and practising business procedures

(banking, insurance, bookkeeping, international trade, entrepreneurship and business

etiquette) and programmes in the economy as well as enhancing research abilities and

it's consequent undertaking in business studies oriented programmes.

2.3. Importance of Community Resources

Olsen (1965), explained that community experiences, first- hand learning through

immediate sensory contacts with the environment is a basic psychological learning

approach. Through these contacts the pupil uses the community as a learning

laboratory. He explores it, studies and improves it.

A Roman satirist observed;

17
"I tell you we don't educate our children in school; we stultify them and send them out
into the world half-baked. And why?Because we keep them utterly ignorant of real
life. The common experience is something they never see or hear. All they know is
pirates trooping up the beaches in chains, tyrants scribbling edicts, oracles
condemning three virgins to be slaughtered to stop some plague. Action or language,
it's all the same; great sticky honey –balls of phrases, every sentence looking as
though it has been plopped and rolled in poppy seed and sesame, (Ishumi 1974, p.25).
Students need to experience what they learn in class in the community.

Wittich (1973, p.233) summarised the works of Commenius, Pesstalozzi, Herbert and

Froebel as follows:

"The most effective way to help students to become informed about their social and
natural environment is to provide for them learning experiences which are real or
lifelike and which are available to them for first hand scrutiny, questioning and
cognition".

Ciffone (1988) also observed that community resources can provide the motivation

some students need to see the connection between classroom and the real world.

Involving students in the community gives them exposure to a stimulating learning

environment and to different people and perspectives; provides students a greater

sense of purpose.

Relatively new, too, is awareness throughout the society that we are all in some

measure responsible for the care and preservation of our environment, in towns and

cities just as much as in countryside. There is also an attitude of mind which needs to

be fostered as increasing numbers of children and young people are encouraged to

move out of the school environment into the world beyond. In particular, students

need to be aware that some areas of town and country are sensitive to over-use, that

some habitats are rare and precious, and that much of the world needs to be conserved

and be damaged as much by overuse by those who care for it as by the more

obviously destructive attitudes of developers, the thoughtlessly careless, or those

whose behaviour is clearly anti-social, (Maureen 1972).

18
Akrofi (1981) explains that making the community to be a classroom becomes more

and more important when we consider the role of the school as an agent of social

change. From this point of view education is intervention. The sole aim is to

encourage learners to develop into a good citizen of his community. The traditional

function of the school is to help the parents to transmit their culture, beliefs, and

values to the children. Conditions have so changed educational needs that they not

only have to train children to be like their parents but also to fit into current patterns

of life.

Learning will become more powerful and deeper if students can see continuity from

classroom to outdoor experiences, from academic to non-academic domains. It is

through this continuity and alignment that helps students to connect and apply their

learning across disciplines in and out of the classroom. This conscious effort to help

students transfer their knowledge and thinking skills to non-academic contexts is a

good way to facilitate transfer learning, (Heng 2007).

Dewey (1965) defines education as a reconstruction or reorganisation of experience

which adds to the meaning of experience. The increment of meaning corresponds to

the increased perception of the connections and continuities of the activities in which

we are engaged.

Teachers always face the task of pulling together the diverse understanding their

students bring into the classroom. The use of community resources provides a shared

memory for the class. The event becomes part of the common knowledge of the class

and can be referred in subsequent lessons. What is learned is, thus, reinforced and

extended in later discussions as the teacher refers to field observations.

19
Education process should be everywhere a reflection of life experiences of society and

service to the same system. Freire (1970) observed that a teacher talks about reality

as if it is motionless, static, compartmentalized, and predictable. Or else he expounds

on a topic completely alien to the existential experience of the students. His task is to

"fill" the students with the contents of his narration- contents which are detached from

reality, disconnected from the totality that engendered them and could give them

significance. Words are emptied of their concreteness and become a hollow alienated

and alienating verbosity.

Rousseau in Olsen (1954) observed that if you wish to teach a child geography and

you provide him with globes, spheres and maps. What elaborate preparations! What is

the use of all these symbols; why not begin by showing him the real thing so that he

may at least know what you are talking about. Attitude development results from the

students contact with his social environment. This cannot be achieved if school and

community are separate environments.

Holtschlag (2001) stated that in order for students to make the transfer of classroom

lessons to real world applications, we need to be open to all the possibilities our

community offers. We do not need a big city in which to teach because the resources

are all around us; parents businesses, zoos, museums, nature centres, parks etc. We

are as rich in our community resources as in our imaginations and we have the

opportunity to partner with the community to create meaningful relevant lessons.

Secondary school business teachers and students should make personal contacts and

become a part of the community through active participation in its activities.

A business teacher's major goal is to help individuals and families live more

effectively. He is thus obliged to be aware of all community forces and their

20
influence. He must be familiar with the information about the community

background, attitudes, practices and resources. A keen understanding of these aspects

of community living that impose upon individuals and their families will increase her

ability to put over the subject matter in such a manner that t it should take.

2.4. Methods, procedures, and activities that can be applied in using community

resources

Wittich et el (1973) identifies major methods used to utilize community resources for

educational purposes as walking trips, field study, visits by resource persons, special

learning trips and community surveys.

Community survey activities include fact-finding interviews with business,

governmental, or community leaders in their normal work settings. They enable

accurate determination and understanding of factors inherent in community structure

and processes. Business Studies students will benefit from the opportunity to ask

professional questions about taxation, law, transportation, communication, job

opportunities, etc. To gain the most from a community survey, the students must

discuss what they have read. Formulate well-thought out key questions and with the

teacher, list the names of authorities who feel could best answer the questions.

Olsen defines community surveys as accurate determination through organised study,

of social or physical data, particularly with reference to its spatial patterning and

casual relationships.

Grasha (1996) describes resource persons as people in the community with diversified

interest, talents, occupations and accomplishments. Visits by resource persons are

valuable means of bringing demonstrations and specialised information into the

21
classroom. Guest speakers can provide novelty needed to capture student's attention.

Their elaborations on issues often provide a different context for the content of the

class. Resource persons help students to acquire and retain information.

Taiwo, (2007), states that resource persons fascinate students as they get excited to

see professionals like bankers, experts in international trade etc. they motivate

students and some aspire to be like them. They also provide current and authentic

information which will not be available in textbooks. No community either small or

isolated is without resource people who can contribute to making classroom

experiences more realistic and vital.

Olsen (1954) observed that resource persons contribute to solution of the problems,

they help to enrich and broaden meanings, to awaken and build worthwhile interests,

to acquaint students with varied aspects of their social and physical environment and

develop deep sensitivity to people, their ways of living, accomplishments and

problems.

Resource persons can be of any age and come from all the sectors of the community.

Careful planning and approaches are needed to secure resource people. First of all, the

important step is determining how a particular person's area of competence fits into

the program of the class. It is essential to know what contributions the visit of the

resource person can make to the enrichment of the students understanding,

development and modification of attitudes. Guest speakers from the community can

provide new information and experiences to students and link the school to outside

world.

Field trips provide an opportunity for real experiencing through which to gain valid

understanding. They provide an experience not available in the classroom.

22
Theoretical concepts can be matched with real life examples. They connect the

students with the real life experience. Students find themselves face to face with real

life situations that have previously only talked about in the classroom. They enable

students to get concrete evidence necessary to build concepts, (Dale 1959).

Wittich (1973), states that field trips arouse and create interest. Few learners fail to be

motivated as they contemplate and examine things, processes and ideas. They create a

background of experience which will give meaning to reading and simple research

done later in the formal study situations of the school classroom and library.

Leader, (2003), states that field trips add value to the educational experience provided

by schools. They provide an experience not available in the classroom. They give the

teacher an opportunity to confront students with different learning challenges, which

include enhancing investigative skills, problem solving and participating in extended

periods of concentrative study. Many teachers see trips as an important motivating

factor, perhaps a way of overcoming barriers with pupils who show signs of

disaffection.

Field trips allow students to meet and work with experts who are not normally

available in the school time. If students are exposed to outside visits, learners are

expected to exercise responsibility and self-control, the qualities of perseverance,

initiative and self-discipline (school publications, 1975).

Bagulia (2005), observed that field trips tend to be more meaningful and permit easier

transfer of learning. They review and drill ideas learnt in visiting factories. The idea

of learning a plant and products manufactured can be better fixed in student's minds.

The learners can have a positive impact on long term memory due to memorable

nature of the field work setting.

23
Field trips not only enhance students understanding of the subject but also facilitate

good communication and relation between the students and teachers. Leader (2003)

states that relationships between teachers and students can flourish and subsequently

there are huge dividends back in school.

Walking trips involve visiting nearby community workers, food stores plant and so

on. Walking trips provide invaluable study experiences within the immediate vicinity

of the school. Walking trips make it possible for pupils themselves to watch important

things happen. Students are given opportunities to leave the school grounds alone or

in groups to investigate and report what they have found.

Special learning trips include those organised around facilities maintained for the

purpose of the school district itself. They include museums, government agencies etc.

Community resources involve working experiences. Olsen (1954) describes work

experience as a sustained intellect activity of body and mind carried on for the

purposes which are primarily pre vocational in nature. It is a practical activity in the

production or distribution of goods or services exercised in a normal way in business,

industrial, professional, and industrial fields. The aim of work experience is to help

young people to acquire vocational orientation, the specific skills and interests and

sustained self-discipline essential to their individual success in some vocational

career. In this process the community becomes a partner with the school.

Community service projects can enhance learning. These are co-operative group

activities organised and carried out by students as specific contributions to civic

welfare. Rickinison (2004) states that community projects have the capacity to link

with most curriculum areas. Two specific examples of benefits stemming from this

are positive gains and skills and improved understanding of design and technology

24
related issues. (Olsen 1954) also observed that a youngster who serves his fellows as a

safety patrol man or as an assistant in the library, office or laboratory gain a feeling of

personal significance, a sense of belonging, a new maturity and finer loyalty to his

school community.

Community resources also include documentary materials. They are available in

every community. They not only make learning more interesting and functional but

also bridge the gap between the school and community. Documentary materials can

be secured from standard publishers, government officials' civic organisations and

business organisations, (Olsen 1954).

2. 5. Extent to which Community Resources have been used in other Countries

History of use of community resources lies in variety of academic traditions such as

of educational reformer John Amos Comenius (1592-1870) who believed that

children learn best through the use of their senses, and where better to experience this

holistic learning than outdoors. Likewise, Philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-

1778) and educational reformer Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi 1746-1827 both believed

in the efficacy of direct experience, (Ewert 2006).

Brown (1969) observed that San Diego city schools curriculum services division

compiled a list of authoritative and motivating resource persons, who have indicated a

willingness to participate via telephone in classroom instruction. Names, addresses,

and telephone numbers are given for more than 200 individuals, along with their

special fields of competence and interest, and grade level suitability. Amplified

telephone calls are placed from the classroom. Students prepare questions in advance

25
and resource person answers are heard by all in the room. Categories of specialists

include communication, manufacturing, marketing, transportation and utilities.

Upper grade social science teacher took a class to a civic centre and wrote "very

stimulating tour when studying the United States government, reparation of the tour

very necessary to increase interest and make for more intelligent questions. The tour

of the building is very interesting and the importance of the functions of the various

offices takes on some realism that is not found in the books. The follow up

discussions and written reports for essay type grading showed this to have been very,

very worthwhile, (Brown 1973)."

Reddi (2004) made a case study in the use of teleconferencing in distance education in

India. Teleconferencing makes it possible to connect resource persons at one end and

the learners/ participants gathered at disposal centres, and engage them in dialogue,

discussions and doing activities with effective learning outcomes. They use resource

persons to provide information in their area of expertise.

In Guinea, for instance it is intended that every school no matter what its level or type

of education it provides will be a centre of education revolutionary which will take

place in the life of the local community. Students interact with the community

resources. Consequently for each stage of education there is a concrete form of

corresponding centre of education revolutionary activity which dovetails into the life

of the village, the ward, region and the nation, (Thompson 1981).

In Somali the national literacy campaign inaugurated in Somalia in 1973 followed the

successful adoption of the Roman alphabet for writing of Somali and its immediate

introduction as the medium of instruction in schools. A two year campaign utilising

all the educated Somalis as instructors was estimated to have made 400,000 people

26
literate and was followed by a one year campaign in which literacy was associated

with teaching about health and livestock management. For this second phase all

schools were closed for one year to free teachers and pupils to participate more in the

exercise. In the process teachers and pupils were able to practice what they had

learned in the classroom.

The work of Tai Solarin at Mayflower school at Ikenne, Nigeria is a case in point.

Dissatisfied with the secondary grammar school in which they were working, Solarin

and his wife set about building a school of their own in which there would be a

greater freedom of thought and belief, less rigid discipline, and strong emphasis on

manual and practical activities. Gradually they built up a largely self sufficient school

community in which building and maintenance and food production were undertaken

by the pupils, and which was both co-educational and residential. (Thompson 1981)

Thomson (1981) observed that in Ethiopia it is intended that eventually the schools

will become self-reliant and self-sufficient. In agricultural areas the plan is for each

school to have at least ten hectares of land whilst in urban areas schools will be

attached to garages, industries or other productive units.

He further observed that in Ethiopia the Zemecha campaign for development through

co-operation was launched in 1974. It deployed 60,000 secondary and university

students together with their teachers to teach rural people the principles of Ethiopian

revolution and to assist them in local development activities, land reform and

formation of farmers associations. This programme was to last for five years at least

in order to reach as many as seven million people. One of the purposes of such

campaigns is to re-educate those participating as instructors.

27
Natangali School in Tanzania in the early 1930 perhaps took this idea furthest in its

deliberate attempt to contribute in the school the modern forms of knowledge of the

outside world with the traditional knowledge of local tribes which was conveyed to

the other young people outside the school. The school appointed four Watambili

elders (with long experience in traditional education), one from each of the main local

tribes to come into residence in the school and continue their teaching as part of the

normal curriculum. (Thompson 1981)

The Kwamsisi community school in Tanzania was developed by Korogwe College of

national education working with teachers and members of the community. The

primary school wing has pioneered the reform of primary school curriculum along

community- centred lines including a study in the four areas of functional literacy and

numeracy, citizenship and political education, self-help and cultural activities, and

community studies. These studies were linked to community projects in the village.

(Thompson, 1981)

The Phelps-Stokes commissions, representing the government and missionary bodies

and including notably James Aggrey, the most distinguished African educationist of

his day suggested ways in which these principles might be implemented. The teaching

of school subjects should be linked to the study of the local community and

curriculum should include health, the use of the environment in agriculture and

industry.

The reason for the trend taken by many countries is the belief that local members of

the community are in a better position to guide the integration of the school with the

community. Equally important is the growing need to tap community resources to

finance educational development.

28
2.6. Related studies on Community Resources

Research was conducted by the national foundation for educational research in

England on a review of outdoor learning in primary school pupils, secondary school

students and undergraduate learners. In their findings, opportunities for outdoor

learning by school students had decreased substantially in the recent years. There is

evidence that fieldwork is restricted to science. Provision of outdoor learning is

affected by a wide range of barriers and opportunities. These barriers include, fear and

concern about the health and safety of the students. Teachers did not want to take

responsibilities of accidents happening to the students while they are out of the

classroom. He further found out that teachers lack confidence when teaching out of

the classrooms. They may not be able to control the behaviours of students, some

students may be distracted. He further observed that shortage of time, resources and

support were contributing factors. His final observation was wider changes within and

beyond the education sector was a contributing factor, (Rickinson 2004).

Taiwo (2007) conducted a study on the influence of teachers' variables on the use of

community resources for social instructions in Ilorin metropolitan environment. From

the findings of her study, she made the following observations. Majority of social

studies teachers made little or no use of community resources in enhancing their

teaching. The teachers identified factors such as lack of experience with community

oriented pedagogy, inadequate time to integrate community resources, administrators

non-support, lack of funds, inadequacy of pre-service training, low teacher morale,

the school timetable and distance of needed resources to the schools as inhibiting

factors against the effective use of community resources.

29
Bola (2006) made an investigation into the use of resource persons for quality control

of science instruction in Kware state secondary schools in Nigeria. Her findings

revealed that female teachers are less inclined to attend workshops and conferences

where resource persons are known to present papers. This is because sometimes

workshops and conferences in which resource persons feature may be outside their

station. Thus travelling outside the station may not attract female science teachers.

Bola's study also revealed that science teachers in government schools are more aware

of the existence of resource persons than those in community and schools under the

management board. The trend is a result of the location of most government schools

in townships and more importantly the ministry often supports its science teachers to

attend workshops and conferences where resource persons present papers concerning

improving the quality of science instruction and the education policy, held in

universities whenever the need arises. Thus it is not surprising that science teachers

from government schools know that resource persons are available.

Bola's study also revealed that science teachers with higher academic qualification are

more inclined to invite resource persons to secondary schools. They perceive resource

persons as partners in progress and seek their expertise for improvement of science

instruction in secondary schools. Also science teachers with a degree and teaching

qualification in addition realise the shortage of qualified teachers in Nigerian

secondary schools and may be overloaded in terms of periods per week and class size.

Therefore they would require some assistance from resource persons from the

faculties of education of the universities.

Thompson (1981) argues that teachers continue to be doubtful about the instruction

provided by members of the community who may well be themselves "uneducated" as

30
well as unskilled in the art of teaching. Learners remain unwilling to give the due

respect to such instructors and the local instructors who have often found their work

uncongenial have tended to be unreliable and fall away.

He further observed that teachers of social studies area who wish to take their classes

out of school to visit a museum or post office, for instance, may not find it easy to

persuade their colleagues to allocate sufficient block of time on the timetable for the

purpose or to give up their own claims on the school bus or lorry.

Olsen (1954) stated that teachers face administrative problems among them are

scheduling, transportation, expenses and liability.

Azeb (1975) felt that teachers encounter many problems in using community

resources. Many educational systems practice strict schedules that are not flexible

enough to allow planning for an extended visit. This rigidity has left teachers with no

time to use community resources. He further observed that financial problems are

very dominant because no funds are allocated for this purpose. Azeb found out that

many teachers had negative attitudes towards the use of community resources because

this gives them extra responsibilities. He noted that parents feel that the use of these

resources in a particular area tend to base education on the needs of the particular

community and this means students will be trained for life within the community

only. The findings pointed out that head teachers fear that students will perform

poorly in examinations if they are offered experiences outside materials assigned by

the ministry of education.

Awino (1987) conducted a study on resources used for teaching Social Studies in

Nairobi primary schools and her observations were that planning educational trips for

students has been hindered by a number of factors such as lack of time for good

31
preparation or opportunity for a trip itself. Also the biggest task seems to be getting

students and teachers to establish good attitudes towards such endeavour.

She further observed that use of resource person is not without problems. Resource

people are not taken seriously by students and this makes them unwilling to turn up

when invited again. Others are suspicious that they were not invited in good faith.

Very superior resource people are too busy with their occupations that they are not

reliable. There are also some resource persons who need payment which is normally

not forthcoming. Finally duration of lessons is also too short to allow adequate use of

such people.

Digolo (1986) conducted a study on use of community resources in primary schools.

He made the following findings, that use of resources is affected by lack of

articulation of need for utilisation of resources in the educational objectives and

policies at the national curricular and instructional levels. Teachers and administrators

felt that the classes were too large in terms of enrolment. Large classes in terms of

enrolment negatively affected the incorporation of community resources and

community oriented activities since teachers were influenced to design lesson delivery

systems and strategies that suited overcrowding conditions of their classes.

Another constraint observed was lack of guidelines for acquisition and utilisation of

community resources. It was found out that some schools used the official school

syllabi as guideline for selection and utilisation of resources even though such

documents were not sufficiently oriented to the communities surrounding the school.

Achoki (2004) conducted an inquiry into the use of resources in teaching of secondary

schools biology in North Kisii District, Kenya. In his findings textbooks, charts and

specimens were instructional resources used by most teachers. Even though resources

32
found in the local environment were used in the teaching of biology, it was limited

mainly to plant and animal materials. Resource persons, field trips,

factories/industries, forests just to mention a few played a limited role in teaching and

learning of the subject. He observed that lack of finance and support from

administration accounted for the inadequacy of most instructional materials.

Wanza (2008) conducted a study on implementation of the Business Studies

curriculum in public secondary schools in Machakos central division. In her findings,

75% of the respondents indicated that the resources were available even though they

were inadequate. Community resources are inexpensive materials which can be found

within the schools. The study will come out with measures that will encourage

teachers to make use of community resources while teaching.

2.7. Summery of Review of Related Literature

The above studies show that a lot of research has been done on use of community

resources and their importance in teaching and learning. Despite the tremendous

amount of information available there is still much that needs to be understood. This

is supported by the fact that research in developed countries has considered the factors

that will encourage use of community resources.

Several studies have been made in Africa on use of community resources in other

subjects but none has been made on business studies. Business studies are referred to

as a 'living subject' because the ideas, concepts and activities in the business world are

part and parcel of our daily existence. They are therefore practical to the student's life

and society as a whole, (Nyam 2005). K.I.C.D. has advocated that teachers utilise

locally available materials which are cost effective. Community resources provide a

33
rich environment in teaching Business Studies. It is therefore necessary to find out to

what extent community resources are used by teachers of Business Studies.

It has also been noted from the review that there are several challenges when using

community resources. The study addresses the gap in knowledge by seeking to find

out if teachers and students use community resources, and the challenges they face if

any.

34
 CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

3.1. Introduction

This chapter outlines the procedure that was used to collect the required data. It

details the research design, study location of the study, target population, the sample

size and sampling procedure, research instruments, research instrument used and their

preparation, data collection analysis, procedures and ethical considerations that were

taken into account.

3.2. Research Design

The study was a descriptive study. According to Lokesh (1984), descriptive research

studies are designed to obtain precise information concerning the current status of the

phenomena and whenever possible to draw valid conclusion from the facts discussed.

This design assists a researcher to identify, observe, describe and analyse existing

phenomenon on the basis of prevailing circumstances. The design was adopted

because the variables involved in the study cannot be manipulated.

3.2.1 Study Variables

Independent variables include useof community resources, such as resource people

field trips, work experiences, community service projects etc.

Moderating variables include teacher‟s workload and nature of teaching tasks and

school culture and leadership resource support in teacherscommunity resource

35
integration. Dependent variables include positive attitude towards Business Studies,

acquisition of knowledge and skills, stimulation of interest in business related careers

and improved performance.

3.2.2. Location of the study

The study was conducted in Ruiru District of Kiambu County Kenya. Ruiru district is

approximately 30km from Nairobi the capital city of Kenya. The district was selected

because it is located in both urban and rural setting which is an advantage as it

provides opportunity to sample a variety of community resources.

3.3 Target Population.

The target population in this study comprised all secondary school principals, teachers

and students of 22 secondary schools Ruiru District. The estimated population was 22

principals, 200teachers and1000 students.

3.4. Sampling techniques and sample size

3.4.1. Sampling techniques

The study involved Business Studies teachers, Head teachers and learners in Form

three. Purposive sampling, stratified sampling and random sampling techniques were

adopted.

The schools surveyed were selected through stratified random sampling technique the

strata involved boys, girls or mixed schools. The same technique was applied to

further sample schools on the basis of whether or not they were private and public

schools. Purposive sampling technique was adopted where there was only one

Business Studies teacher. However where there were two or more teachers one was

36
selected randomly.Principals in each sampled schoolwere purposivelysampled.

Student respondents were selected randomly.

The teachers of Business Studies were selected because they implement the Business

studies curriculum and they make use of community resources while teaching. Head

teachers gave information on why they are unable to support the use of community

resources. Finally the learners in form three enlightened the researcher on the

community resources they use and how often they use them. Form three class was

selected because form four was an examination class while form ones and two are not

yet fully oriented in the school.

3.4.2. Sample size

The study population comprised principals of selected schools, Business Studies

teachers, and form three learners from the ten selected secondary schools. Ten

Business Studies teachers, ten Principals were selected and one hundred students of

form three were sampled.

3.5. Construction of Research Instruments

The data was collected using

1. Questionnaire for Business Studies teachers

2. Questionnaire for form three Business Studies students

3. Interview schedule for principals.

37
3.5.1. Interview Schedule for Principals

The study applied semi-structured interview which has an advantage of being

flexible. The interview comprised of open and close-ended questions. These

questions give the researcher in-depth information which may not be collected using

questionnaires.

3.5.2. Questionnaires for Teachers

Questionnaires were the main data collection tools in the study. Teacher's

questionnaire was divided into three parts. Part one had items on availability of

resources, part two extent to which community resources have been utilised and final

part challenges if any when using community resources. Some questions were close –

ended seeking specific information while others were open-ended giving respondents

an opportunity to give their views on the subject.

3.5.3. Questionnaire for Students

The questionnaire comprised open-ended and close ended questions. It had questions

on availability of resources in their school, how often the teachers use them. Data

from the student questionnaire was used to compare information with that given by

the teachers on the use of community resources, to determine the adequacy and

extent they use community resources.

3.6. The Pilot Study

Prior to visiting the schools for data collection, a re-test study was done before the

actual study. This was to ensure that the instrument was able to measure the

variablesexpected in the study. It was carried out at Githurai Secondary School. The

38
instruments were administered on a group of ten selected participants who had the

same characteristics. The sampling of participants followed similar procedures

designed on the actual study described above. The participants filled the

questionnaires and were allowed to give their opinions. This facilitated changes and

modifications of questionnaire for improvement of the instruments and procedures

for the actual collection of the data of the study. Vague statements of the

questionnaire were refined or removed all together and final instruments made.

3.6.1. Reliability

To test the reliability of the instruments, the researcher used split- half techniques.

This was done by administering the instrument to the all respondents in the pilot

study. After they make their responses, the instrument items were divided into two

sets using odd numbered items for one set and even number for the other set.

Responses made on each set of the items were scored by the researcher on the basis

on the assigned scores. The results were correlated using Pearson's product

correlation coefficient alpha. A reliability value of 0.86 was established.

3.6.2. Validity

The instruments of this study were subjected to initial item screening for content and

logical validity. Seven postgraduate students in the department of education

communication technology were selected. Based on their feedback, some

modifications were made to improve the quality of the item.

3.7 Data collection procedure

The researcher obtained permit from the ministry of education science and technology

authorizing her to collect data from secondary schools. The permit from the ministry

39
instructed the researcher to first report to the district commissioner and district

education officer, before embarking on the study. The researcher did, and received

permit from both offices. The D.C. gave permit instructing the D.O in four divisions

to allow the researcher to visit schools under their jurisdiction. The D.E.O's permit

authorized head teachers of the selected schools to allow the researcher into their

schools for the purpose of collecting data.

The researcher visited the selected schools. The first visit was to explain the nature

and purpose of the study and to seek permission from the head teachers. During the

visit, the researcher and the Head teachers agreed on the appropriate dates to visit the

schools and to administer the instruments.

On the second visit the researcher with the help of the heads of department selected

one form three class for those schools which had more than one stream. To select

student respondents the researcher sought the help of the teachers. The student

questionnaires were administered by the researcher with the business studies teacher.

Questionnaires were collected on the same day.

Teacher's questionnaires were issued to respective business studies teachers teaching

form three classes. They were to fill them at their own free time but were collected

later in the day.

For the interview guide, the researcher conducted face to face interview with the

principals. Interviews lasted between 15-20 minutes, but in every case participants

were given plenty of time to respond freely.

3.8 Data analysis techniques

The items in the questionnaire were both closed and open-ended. Responses to close

ended items were analysed using tally marks. For responses to open –ended items the

researcher had to read through all the responses by item and classify the responses

40
into broad categories. Tally marks were then used to indicate the individual responses

to each category. From tally marks of raw data, frequencies were obtained and

percentages calculated. The analysed data was then organised and displayed in tabular

form.

3.9. Logistical and ethical considerations

The researcher sought permission from the relevant authorities like the ministry of

education. Information given by participants was treated with confidentiality.

Anonymity of the participants was ensured where numbers were used to label data

instead of names.

Finally informed consent was sought from the subjects through a written request

attached to the questionnaire.

41
 CHAPTER FOUR

DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION

4.1. Introduction

This chapter presents the findings of the study. It includes analysis, interpretation and

discussion of the data gathered from the field of study in an attempt to investigate the

availability and use of community resources in teaching Business Studies in

secondary schools in Ruiru district, Kiambu County. The findings will be discussed

according to the following objectives that guided the study:

i. To find out the types of community resources used in teaching Business Studies in

secondary schools.

ii. To establish how often community resources are used by Business Studies

teachers.

iii. To identify factors those inhibit the use of community resources in teaching

Business Studies at the secondary school level in Ruiru District, Kiambu County.

iv. To propose measures towards improving the use of community resources in

teaching Business studies in secondary schools.

4.2 Teacher's background information.

The analysis of demographic information of the participants is presented according to

gender, age, academic qualification and category of the school. This information will

highlight the important characteristics of the participants. Knowledge of demographic

characteristics of teachers is useful in highlighting the important characteristics of the

42
participants who took part in the study. It provides a basis for projections of use of

community resources in relation to different background characteristics.

Figure 4.1: Teacher's numbers by Gender.

00

40

60

Figure 4.1 shows that 60% of the participants were male and 40% constituted female

participants. It can be concluded that majority of teachers of business studies were

male teachers.

Table 4.1Age of the Respondents.

Age No. of teachers. %

20-30 2 20

31-40 5 50

41-50 3 30

Over 50 0 0

Total 10 100

43
Table 4.2 above indicates that majority of the participants fell in the age bracket of

between 31-40 years (50%) followed by ages 41-50 years (30%), below 30 years

(20%) and over 50 years there was none (0%).

The age of an individual respondent is important to the study since it reflects not only

his chronological growth but also experiential development.

Table 4.2.Teacher's Academic and Professional Qualification.

Academic/professional No. of teachers %

qualification
Untrained 2 20

Diploma 1 10

Bachelor of ed. Degree 5 50

Master‟s Degree 2 20

Total 10 100

From table 4.2 70% of the respondents were graduate teachers with bachelor's degree

in education, 10% diploma holders and 20 % were untrained teachers.

44
Figure 4.2: Teaching Experience.

below 2 years
3-5 years
over 5 years

Figure 4.2 shows that 60% of the teachers can be regarded as being very experienced

having taught for more than five years. The length of time a teacher has spent in a

school has given him an opportunity to be exposed to variety of community resources

such as people objects, places of learning importance and activities that can provide

educational experience. 40% of the teachers had taught less than 5 years.

Table 4.3.Average class size.

No. of students per class Frequency %

Below 30 1 10

31-45 2 20

46 & above 7 70

Total 10 100

45
Table 4.5 indicates that 70% of the respondents had a class size of 46 and above

students while 30% of the respondents had a class size of less than 46 students. A

large class size influences the methodology and type of resources that can be adopted

in presentation of lessons.

Figure 4.3.Location of the school.

rural
urban

Location of the school refers to the places in which the schools of the study are

situated. They have a bearing on the type of community resources that may be used in

teaching business studies.

Figure 4.3 shows that 30% of the respondents indicated that their schools were located

in urban setting while 70% in the rural areas.

46
4.3. Knowledge of the community.

The first objective of the study was to identify community resources available in

communities surrounding the schools of study which can be used to teach business

studies in secondary schools.

Every community is endowed with a wide variety of resources that can be used in

teaching business studies. This section was considered essential to determine how

respondents viewed the community surrounding their schools and community

resources therein.

Table 4.4.Knowledge on the community surrounding the school.

Teachers Students

Item Frequency % Frequency

%

Rich and full of activities in the 3 30 60 60

field of Business Studies.

Has a few activities and people in 6 60 30 30

the field of Business Studies

Very poor with nothing to be 1 10 10 10

noticed.

Total 10 100 100 100

47
Table 4.4Shows that 30% of the teacher respondents referred the community as rich

and full of activities, 60% reported that the community had a few activities and people

in the field of Business Studies and 10% stated that the community was poor with

nothing to be noticed.

60% of the student respondents felt that their district is rich and full of activities and

people in the field of Business Studies, 30% felt that it has a few activities and people

in the field of Business Studies and 10% stated that the district is poor with nothing to

be noticed. According to the responses of the students, local environment is very

resourceful. From the findings, the teachers feel that the community where the schools

are located is not surrounded by community resources.

The researcher wanted to find out if Business Studies teachers were conversant with

community resources in their school district.

The respondents were required to identify (from a given list), some of the resources

found in their school district. Since more than one response was supplied by each

respondent the frequencies apply not to the total number of respondents but to how

many respondents confirm that the resource is found in that district.

48
 Table 4.5.Some of the resources identified near the schools by teachers and

students.

Teachers Students

Item Frequency % rank No. of % rank

respondents

Banks 7 70 4 90 90 3

Insurance companies 5 50 10 50 50 8

Industries 7 70 4 80 80 4

Warehouses 6 60 7 46 46 9

Wholesalers 10 100 1 80 80 4

Open air markets 10 100 1 94 94 2

Retail Shops 10 100 1 100 100 1

Post office 7 70 4 54 54 6

Accounting firms 5 50 10 46 46 9

Law firms 6 60 7 38 38 11

Airport 0 0 14 0 0 14

Sea Port 0 0 14 0 0 14

Railway Terminal 2 30 13 20 20 13

Farms 6 60 7 60 60 7

The resources that were identified by all the teacher respondents with the highest

percentage (100%) were wholesalers, open air markets and retail shops. They were

followed by banks, manufacturing companies and post office with 70% of the

49
respondents, agricultural firms with 60%, insurance companies and firms were

identified by 50% of the respondents. 20% of the respondents identified railway

terminals and none identified a sea port or airport.

The resources that were identified by all the student respondents with the highest

number (100%) were retailers, open air markets 94%, banks 90%. Manufacturing

companies and wholesalers were identified by 80% of the respondents. Post office

with 54%, insurance companies and firms were identified by 50% of the respondents.

Accounting firms and warehouses were identified by 46%of the respondents.

Agricultural firms with 60%, of the respondents. 20% of the respondents identified

railway terminals and none identified a sea port or airport.

It can be concluded that the community surrounding the school is rich in community

resources that can be used in teaching business studies.

4.4. Extent to which Community Resources have been used in teaching Business

Studies.

The second objective is to find out how often community resources have been used in

teaching business studies

50
 Table.4.6. Extent to which various methods of teaching using community

resources have been used.

Teachers Students

Item/resource No. of respondents No. Of respondents

Regularly Occasion Never Regularly occasionally never

ally

Practical activities 6(60%) 3(30%) 1(10%) 10(10%) 20(20%) 70(70%)

Use of written materials 2(20%) 6(60%) 2(20%) 25(25%) 60(60%) 15(15%)

like newspapers and

magazines

Field trips 2(20%) 6(60%) 2(20%) 5(5%) 10(10%) 85(85%)

Resource persons 1(10%) 3(30%) 6(60%) 0(0%) 10(10%) 90(90%)

According to the responses of the teachers, practical activities were used regularly by

6 (60%) occasionally by 3(30%) and never by 1(10%) of the participants. Using

written materials like magazines and newspapers was regularly done by2 (20%) of the

respondents 6(60%) said they occasionally used these materials and 2(20%) never

used them. Field trips were regularly taken by 2(20%) occasionally by 60(60%) and 2

(20%) never. Resource persons were not regularly used by 1(10%), occasionally used

by 3(30%) and never used by 6(60%).

According to the responses of the students, practical activities were used regularly by

10 (10%) occasionally by 20(20%) and never by 70(70%) of the participants. Using

written materials like magazines and newspapers was regularly done by25 (25%) of

51
the respondents 60(60%) said they occasionally used these materials and 15(15%)

never used them. Field trips were regularly taken by 5 (5%) occasionally by 10(10%)

and 85 (85%) never. Resource persons were not regularly used by 0(0%), occasionally

used by 1(100%) and never used by 9(90%)

Table.4.7.How often places of educational value in relation to Business Studies

were visited.

Teachers Students

Extent of use Respondents % Rank Respondent % Rank

Every lesson 0 0 4 0 0 3

Once a month 0 0 4 0 0 3

Once a term 1 10 3 0 0 3

Once a year 6 60 1 40 40 2

Never 3 30 2 60 60 1

Total 10 100 100 100

From the table above, teacherrespondents 30% stated that they had not visited any

place of educational value. 60% said they visited once a year. 10% said they visited

once a term. None of the respondents visited every lesson.

60% of the student respondents had never visited places of educational value. 40%

had visited once a year.

It can be concluded that places of educational have not been properly utilized in

teaching Business Studies

52
Table 4.8.Extent to which Resource People were used in teaching Business

Studies.

The researcher had classified some resources into two groups, people and

activities/events/places. The frequencies do not apply instead of total of 10

respondents a rank ordering was provided.

Teachers Students

Item Respondents % rank Respondents % Rank

Shopkeeper 0 0 0 1 10% 3

Accountant 0 0 0 2 20% 1

Insurer 0 0 0 0 0% 6

Banker 0 0 0 0 0% 6

Salesman 1 10 1 1 10% 3

Entrepreneur 0 0 0 2 20% 1

From the table aboveteachers' responses it can be concluded that none of the resource

person has been invited or visited. Almost 10 out of 10 respondents admitted not to

have used resource persons in teaching Business Studies. It can be concluded from the

table above that resource people have not been properly used. These findings go

against those of (Bola 2006) who found out that science teachers perceive resource

persons as partners in progress. They seek their expertise regularly for improvement

of science.

53
 The students were asked whether they use resource persons while learning. The

resource person used by the highest number was an accountant and entrepreneur used

by 20%. The second in rank was salesman and shopkeeper at 10%. The rest of the

resource persons have not been used by the respondents at 0%.

The eleventh item was a list of places that have been visited for educational purposes.

4.9. Extent to which places/events/activities of educational value in relation to

Business Studies have been used.

Teachers Students

Item Respondents % Rank Respondents % Rank

Local market 1 10 3 40 40 3

Supermarket 0 0 6 50 50 2

Manufacturing industry 3 30 2 30 30 4

Warehouse 0 0 6 20 20 6

Airport/railway station/seaport 1 10 3 0 0 7

Exhibitions /trade fair 4 40 1 0 80 1

Local bank 0 0 6 30 30 4

Insurance company 0 0 6 0 0 7

From table 4.14 above, the findings of teachers seem to indicate that places of

educational value have been poorly used. The commonly visited place was trade fairs

with 40% of the respondents. Manufacturing industry had 30% of the respondents,

54
local market and processing industry 10%. The rest of the places had not been visited

by the respondents.

From the responses of students, the most visited place was the Nairobi international

trade fair with 80% of the respondents. Supermarkets at 50%, local market 40%, local

bank 30%, warehouse and manufacturing industry 20%, processing industry 10% and

finally none of the respondents had visited an airport and an insurance company. It

can be concluded except for the trade fairs, other resources have not been properly

used.

In addition to the above findings, the students felt that teachers should use community

resources regularly while teaching. They thought their teachers were lazy and were

not doing their best.

4.5. Objective three was to identify factors that inhibit the use of community

resources in teaching Business Studies at secondary schools.

This objective was to find out the challenges if any that teachers face when using

community resources.

Research question 5 was what are the constraints encountered by Business Studies

teachers in using community resources?

55
Table 4.10.Do Business Studies teachers use community resources while

teaching.

Teachers

Responses Frequency %

True 5 50%

Not true 1 10%

Sometimes 4 40%

Total 10 100%

Table 4.10.Above shows that 50% of the teachers admitted that it was true they did

not make use of community resources. 10% reported "it was not true" that they did

not use community resources in teaching. 40% indicated that they sometimes used

community resources.

Research question four was to find out factors that inhibit the use of community

resources in teaching business studies in secondary schools.

56
Table 4.11.Reasons for inadequate use of community resources by Business

Studies teachers.

Statement SA A UN D SD TOTAL

The school is not surrounded by 5(50) 3(30) 0(0) 1(10) 1(10)

community resources.

There is lack of time to use 4(40) 3(30) 0(0) 2(20) 1(10)

community resources.

In my opinion students lack 0(0) 2(20) 2(20) 4(40) 2(20)

interest when community

resources are used.

There is over enrolment of 5(50) 3(30) 0(0) 1(10) 1(10)

students in my school.

There is lack of support from 7(70) 1(10) 0() 1(10) 0(0)

school authorities in funding

community resources.

Parents do not like seeing 2(20) 2(20) 4(40) 1(10) 1(10)

students outside the school

compound.

Disrupts the timetables and 3(30) 3(30) 2(20) 1(10)

1(10)
other functions of the school.

It is risky to take students out or 2(20) 2(20) 3(30) 2(20) 1(10)

to bring strangers in the school.

57
Table 4.15, required respondents to give specific reasons from a given list for

inadequate use of community resources in teaching business studies. Respondents

who reacted from the previous question, those who reported "it is true"and I

sometimes use community resources were asked to indicate specific reasons for

inadequate use of resources. 80% of the respondents felt that their schools were not

surrounded by community resources while 20% felt the schools were surrounded by

community resources. If there was enough time to make use community resources in

teaching- 70% of the respondents revealed that there was no of enough time to use

community resources while 30% felt that there was enough time to make use of

community resources. 60% of the respondents felt that students showed interest

towards use of community resources while 40% said their students were not

interested. The respondents were asked how they felt about the size of their classes

and the use of community resources, 80% of the respondents thought that their classes

had a large number of students while 20% felt their classes were small. It was

observed that 80% said they did not receive support from the administration while

20% had support from administration. Most of the respondents were undecided about

the reaction of parents seeing students out of the school compound. 60% of the

respondents felt that use of community resources disrupts the timetable and other

functions of the school while 40% of the respondents felt otherwise. Finally 40% of

the respondents felt that it is risky to take students out or bring strangers into the

classroom against 60% who thought otherwise.

In addition to the above observations, the teachers felt that some of the students lack

discipline making it risky to take them out of the school compound. Another

challenge is that a large class will require more than one teacher to take the students

out of the school compound thus disrupting school timetable and functions of the

58
school. Finally some teachers felt that specific resources should be recommended by

K.I.C.D.

4.6. Report on responses of principals

According to the report of majority of head teachers, secondary schools have only a

few of the teaching /learning materials. Majority of the head teachers looked at the

local community as very resourceful for business studies lessons. Majority of the head

teachers agreed that by providing first-hand information by letting students interact

freely with local environment can make learning experiences more relevant. Majority

of the principals said that business studies teachers sometimes used community

resources.

On the basis of responses of majority of the head teachers, the conclusion was made

that the reason for inadequate use of community resources was that they could not

cover the assigned syllabus if they gave attention to experiences involving community

resources not suggested in the syllabus. They also felt that there are too many students

per class therefore the need for many teachers to accompany them on a trip. They

disrupt the school timetable and other activities of the school. It was also noted that

majority of the head teachers did not have means of transport as most schools visited

did not have as school bus which therefore means that for field trips to be made a bus

has to be hired.

Finally there is the problem of transportation and other expenses for a trip or other

activities. They stated that some of the students come from a poor background and

cannot pay extra cash to cover the activities. Their budget is limited and cannot cover

the costs.

59
4.7. Comparison of principals, Business Studies teachers and Students responses.

On knowledge of the community, the responses of teachers differ from those of head

teachers and students who agreed that the community was rich and full of activities

and people in the field of Business Studies. This was indicated by majority of head

teachers and majority of the students. Teachers however felt that the community had a

few of the activities and people in the field of Business Studies. This was indicated

bymajority (60%) of the respondents. The community being "very poor with nothing

to be noticed" had the lowest responses from all the three groups. This was expressed

by 10% of the teachers none of the head teachers and 10% students. From the

responses of teachers, Business Studies teachers look at their community as having

only a few activities and people in the field of Business Studies.These findings of

teachers go against other findings like those (Ellis 2009, Digolo 1986) who found out

that each community has certain materials which are easily accessible to a resourceful

teacher. Ellis further noted that every town whether rural or urban has buildings and

opportunities that exist for the benefit of learning.

They however seemed to be conversant with the resources found in their school

districts. This is because, except for port which had no responses, all the other

resources listed were identified.

Was adequate use of community resources made by Business Studies teachers? There

was consensus between teachers, head teachers and students who agreed that it was

true that they did not make adequate and effective use of community resources. This

was expressed by majority of theteachers, students and head teachers.Lowest in

responses from both teachers and students were that "it was not true".

60
This was also confirmed by Taiwo (2007), who found out that majority of social

studies teachers made little or no use of community resources in enhancing their

teaching

Responses to extent to which community resources were utilised differed widely

betweenhead teachers, teachers and students. While the highest response for teachers

was once a year the highest response for students was never .these responses were

30%teachers and 60% of the students. Another pattern that emerged from the data was

that guest speakers are the least frequently used despite the educational benefits that

they can bring to the classroom such as the communication of the latest information

on the business world and information that is subject specific which may not be

readily available in textbooks Borrington (20040).

The findings of this study also confirm other previous studies for example; a study

carried out by Awino (1987) on resources used for teaching social studies in Nairobi

primary schools, reported that resource people are not taken seriously by students.

Some of the comments made by teachers are that resource persons too busy and

therefore always unwilling to turn up even if invited. They also felt duration of the

lesson is too short and therefore does not allow the use of resource persons.

The response of teachers and students indicated that use of educational visits is not

widespread. Some teachers provide their students with events such as field trips. The

place that was visited most was trade fairs and exhibitions identified by majority of

teachers and students. The teachers‟ use of this methodology is commendable because

educational visits are a viable method of extending a traditional classroom

environment to outdoors and enabling learners to observe business settings first hand,

thus making learning more interesting and enjoyable (Myers and Jones2004).

61
Reasons for inadequate use of community resources had similar responses from head

teachers and teachers. They both agreed that transportation and other expenses for a

field trip or other activities was a problem in their school. These findings agree with

Taiwo(2007), Olsen (1954), Azeb(1975) and Achoki(2004). These findings also agree

with western scholars such as Asegedom (1998) who made study in northern

Ethiopian primary schools and confirmed that school leadership is critical in

facilitating instructional media use. Hence it can be argued that little can be achieved

(and much might be lost) without their support and active support.

Secondly they both agreed that more time was required to use community resources

while teaching. If they were to use community resources regularly they will not cover

the work laid down in the syllabus. Earle (2002) identified shortage of „planning time‟

among teachers as one of the restraining factors of technology integration. Howe ever

these findings go against (Abdo and Seemela 2010) who found out that the frequency

with which teachers use media in the classroom was not impacted by teacher‟s

workload, time constrains and class size.

62
 CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1. Introduction

This chapter deals with the summary of the research findings, the conclusions based

on the findings, the implications of these, recommendations for action and

suggestions for further research.

5.2. Summary of research findings.

The study sought to find out availability and use of community resources in teaching

Business Studies in secondary schools in Ruiru district Kiambu County.

The analysis of data enabled the researcher to come up with the following findings

presented below based on the research questions.

5.2. 1.Teachers background information.

The findings established that there were more male teachers 60% than female

teachers. The study also established that majority (80%) of the teachers were

professionally trained. Majority had bachelors of education degree followed with

those with postgraduate and others made up of the smallest proportion.

60% of the teachers had a teaching experience of over five years. This clearly

indicated that most of the teachers were experienced and should therefore be very

aware of the important role of community resources in teaching and learning process

as well as how to use them effectively.

63
Average class size of most of the teachers taught was (40) students and above whereas

the ministry of education recommends the maximum number of students per class

should be 45 students. Some of the teachers were teaching classes with more than 45

students. This is likely to have an effect on the use of resources by the teacher in the

teaching process.

5.2.2. Availability of Community Resources used in teaching Business Studies.

Objective one of the study was to identify the community resources used in teaching

Business Studies in secondary schools in Ruiru District of Kiambu County.

It can be concluded from the responses of majority of the students and head teachers

that the community was resourceful and full of activities, people and places that could

be used in teaching Business Studies.

All the three groups seemed to be well conversant with resources found in their

district. This was confirmed as they identified some of the community resources

found in their district except for airport and sea port, all other resources had responses

from the teachers, students and head teachers. Results derived from data obtained

from teachers, administrators and students revealed that all secondary schools of study

were situated in communities which had adequate amount of resources.

64
5.2.3. Extent to which Community Resources were used in teaching Business

Studies

The second objective sought to establish how often teachers used community

resources in teaching Business Studies. Results derivedfrom the data provided by

classroom teachers indicated that the extent to which any particular community

resources were used in teaching and learning was not adequate. Data provided by

teachers showed that it was evident that they did not adequately use community

resources. At no instance they were found using places orpeople from community.

Even results of the data provided by students showed that they did not adequately use

community resources during lessons.

It is apparent from the results provided by data obtained from teachers, administrators,

students and observations that the extent and frequency of use of community

resources in secondary schools was inadequate.

The results reveal that resource people and educational visits were been poorly used

because the % was quite low with both the students and teachers.

5.2.4. Factors that inhibit the use of community resources in teaching Business

Studies.

Results of data obtained from teachers and administrators indicated that the factors

which hindered the effective use of community resources during teaching and

learning in secondary schools were:

Examination pressure particularly externally set and evaluated examination KCSE,

Lack of parental and administration support in terms of providing finance,

Inflexibility of the timetable being used by secondary schools in which periods lasted

65
forty minutes per lesson considered too short to allow incorporation of community

oriented teaching and learning methods as field trips, surveys, nature walk outside the

school compound as indicated in Table 4.4.

Results provided by teachers and administrators show that their secondary schools

were too large in terms of enrolment. Large classes affected the incorporation of

community resources since teachers were influenced to design lesson delivery

systems and strategies that suited the overcrowding conditions of their classes.

5.2.5. Intervention measures towards improving use of Community Resources in

teaching Business Studies in secondary schools.

Respondents' additional recommendations favoured more encouragement of the use of

community resources. Among the changes suggested include,

Co-operations from head teachers, some teachers suggested that the administration

should provide funds for Business Studies projects by charging an extra fee for trips,

they can also invite resource persons to the school with the support of school

administration, teachers should change their attitudes and value their profession, and

consider resources in the community as useful as other valuable educational materials,

ministry of education officials should be cooperative and responsive to the needs of

the schools and finally develop a criteria for selection of suitable teaching and

learning resources from communities. Consider whether the selection will be carried

out by a teacher orpanel.

5.3. Conclusion.

From the findings of this study, the following conclusion can be derived. First

majority of Business Studies teachers made little or no use of community resources in

66
enhancing their teaching of Business Studies. It is evident that use ofresource persons

and educational trips is not widespread. Secondly the teachers identified factors such

as lack of funds, inadequate time to integrate community resources in their

instruction, administratorsnon-support, the school timetable, and the syllabus militate

the effective use of community resources by teachers.

5.4. Recommendations

The following recommendations were made based on findings of this study

1. Business Studies teachers should try as much as possible to integrate the use

of community resources in teaching Business Studies contents. This will

improve the quality of instruction given in schools and also ensure the use of

student centred approach in teaching.

2. School authority particularly school administration should encourage teachers

to use community resources through financial support, appropriate scheduling

of standard timetable and organisation of regular student development

programme to promote teachers efficiency.

3. Ministry of education through inspectorate division should continually

organise seminars and workshops for in servicing Business Studies teachers on

importance and professional use of wide variety of community resources to

facilitate teaching and learning.

67
5.5. Suggestions for further research

1. More intensive investigation should be done on attitudes of teachers and

school heads into the use of community resources in teaching Business

Studies.

2. Similar study should be carried out in other districts in Kenya to determine

whether the findings are similar.

68
 REFERENCES

Abdo, M,.Semela T. (2010). “The Tale of Instructional Media use in Primary

SchoolsofGedeoZone, Southern Ethiopia” Australian journal of education, Vol.
(35)78-89.

Achoki , j. (2004). Inquiry into the Use of Resources in Teaching of Secondary

schoolsBiologyin North Kisii District, Kenya. Unpublished M.E.D
Thesis Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Adam.S. Powell. M. “Using Community Resources”.Classroom Compass 1996 vol 3

No.1. http://www.sed/.org.scimath/compass/vo3no1/usingcom.html.

Adenekule M. (1984). An Investigation Into Effective Utilisation of Instructional

Resources Available in Social Studies Secondary Schools in Oyo State with
ParticularReference to Ogbomoso Local Government Area.Upublished
M.E.D. Thesis university of Ibadan, Ibadan

Akrofi, K. A. (1981). The Living Classroom. London George Allen and Urwin
Ltd .

Awino, O. (1987). A Survey of Resources Used in Teaching Social Studies in Nairobi

PrimarySchools.Unpublished M.E.D.Thesis Kenyatta University.

Azeb, D. (1975). An Investigation of Utilisation of Community Resourcesin

Elementary Schools in Ethiopia to Provide Relevant Education. Unpublished
Dissertation, Ohio, university.

Bagulia, A. (2005). Modern Education, Audio-Visual Aids. New Delhi. Anmol

Publications.

Borrington K.(2004). Teaching and Assessing Skills in Business Studies.Cambridge

University Press.

Bola, D. (2005).An investigation Into the Use of Resource Persons for quality control
of Science Instruction in Kwara State Secondary Schools.Unpublished Thesis
University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

Bradley, R.V. Mbarika, V.Sankar, C.S. Raju, P.K. (2005). Multimedia Instructional
Materials in Mis Classrooms, ideal group inclusive.

Brown, J.W. Lewis.R.B. Harcleroad.F.F. (1969).A-V.Instruction Technology Media

and Methods. New York. Mc Grawshill Company.

Chew, S.K.(2008). The development of Authentic and Localised Instructional

Material for Teaching Business English to year One BBA (honours) Students at Hong
Kong Baptist Unpublished ThesisUniversity,Hong Kong, pp 29-35

69
Ciffone, E. (1998). Using Community Resources in Environmental Education.
Advancing Educationand Environmental Literacy info 34. pdf. Resource
library

Conner, O. M. (1972).Out and About. New York. Methuen and Company Ltd.

Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual Methods in Teaching. New York. Dryden press.

Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and Education. USA. Macmillian Company.

Digolo, O. (1986). A study of Utilisation of Community Resources of Primary

Schools in Kenya to Provide Relevant Education. Unpublished Phd Thesis
Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Earle,R.S.(2002). “The Intergration of Instructional Technology Into Public

Education: Promises and Challenges”, ET Magazine 42(1), 5-13.

Ewert, A. Gilbertson. K. Bates. T. Mclaughlin. T. (2006).Outdoor Education methods

and strategies. USA. Human Kinetics Champaign.

Ellis, M. (2009).Engaging with your Community; Teaching Resources.

http://www.engagingplaces.org.uk/network/art71046

Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York. Herder and Herder.

Gaciabu, R. W. (1989). An investigation of the Utilisation of Community Resources by

Home Science Teachers in Secondary Schools: A Case Study of Embuand
KirinyagaDisricts. Unpublished M.ed. Thesis Kenyatta University Kenya.

Government of Kenya, (2004). National Action Plan on Education for All (2003-
2015).Government Printers .Nairobi.

Grasha, A. (1996). Teaching With Style. California. Alliance Publishers.

Heng, C.B. (2002). Generating Beyond the Classroom. Culture, knowledge and
understanding conference. Singapore.

Holtschlag, M. (2001).Using Community rResources to the Fullest. Volume. 6. no.1.

http://ndl.handle.net2027/spo491908.

Ishumi, A.G.M (1974). Education , A review of Concepts Ideas and Practices .Dar-
es-salaam. Dar-es-salaam Institute of Education.

Jan, H. (2009). “Using Field Trips to Enhance Student Learning in Operations

Management”California Journal of operations management volume7, (1)144-
153.

70
Kombo, O.L & Tromp, L.A. (2006).Proposal & Thesis Writing: An Introduction.
Pauline publications Africa 2nd edition. Don Bosco Printing Press, Makuyu
Kenya

Kontari C.R. (2004). Research Methodology.Methods and Techniques. New Delhi.

New Age International Ltd.

Leader, A. (2003).Tips for Trips.London/NewYork.Continuum.

Lokesh, K. (1984). Methodology of Educational Research. Van Educational Books.

New Delhi.

Mark, R. (2004). A review of Education Research on Outdoor Learning.

http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/teachingandlearning/resourcematerials/growing
schools.

Marjorie Mbilinyi, Equity, Justice and Transformation in Education.

http://www.hakielimu.org.

Moore S.J. Hamson J.B. Donaldson M.L. (2005) Who Stays in Teaching and
Why?Areview of literature on teacher retention available at
http://www.gse.harvard.adu/ngt, retrieved on April 19 2010.

Mugenda,O. M .and Mugenda, A.G. (1999). Research Methods: Quantitative and

Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi. African Centre of Technology Studies
(ACTS) Press.

Mulusa,T.(1990). Evaluation for Beginners.A Practical Study Guide. Nairobi

university college adult art distance education.

Mwangi, M. (2001).Selection and Utilisation of Instructional Resources by Teachers

ofEnglish in Selected Secondary Schools in Muranga District.Unpublished
Masters Thesis Kenyatta University.

Myers B, Jones L. (2004). Effective use of Field trips in Educational Programming.A

Three Stage Approach.Universiity of Florida
IDFASfrom<httpedis.ifas.uf.edu/pdffilesWC/WC05400.pdf.retrieved on Sept 28,
2010.

Nyam.J. (2005).Certificate to Business Studies Book 4 Teachers Guide. Oxford

University Press.East Africa Kenya.

Olsen, G. (1954). School and the Community. USA. Prentice Hall.

Orodho, J. A. (2008). Techniques of Writing Research Proposal and Reports in

Education and Social Sciences. Maseno.Kanezja HP Enterprises.

71
Ouma. O. (2011, November 3). Teach Business Right from Primary School. Daily

Nation.

Reddi.V. (2004).“Teleconferencing Training Kit”. Commonwealth education media

centre for Asia. http// cemca.org.in/ckfinder/userfiles/teleconf6.pdf.

Taiwo, H. (2007,). Influence of Teachers Variables on the Use of Community

Resources for Social Studies Instructions in Ilorin metropolitan Environment.
Department of Arts and Social Sciences Education.Ilorin Nigeria. Ilorin
Journal of Education, Vol (27)11-18

Thompson, A. R. (1981). Education and Development in Africa. London. Macmillian

Publishers.

Wang F. Reeves T.C. (2006).Why do Teachers Need toUse Technology in

theirClassrooms?Issues, problems and solutions computers in schools 20(4) 49-65.

UyangorS.M. Ece D.K. (2010). The Attitudes of Prospective Mathematics Teachers

towards instructional Technologies and Material Development Course. The
Turkish online journal of educational technology, (9) 213-220 from
http://wwwto. Jet.net/articles/v9il/9123pdf> retrieved on June 12 2011.

Wanza. K. (2008).Implementation of Business Studies Curriculum in Public

Secondary Schools in Machakos Central Division of MachakosDistrict,Machakos
County, Kenya. Unpublished Masters of education thesis Kenyatta
University Kenya.

White, C. (2010). Learner –Centred Instruction. California. SAGE publications Ltd.

Wittich, A. W. (1967). Instructional Technology; its Nature and Use. New York.
Harper and Row

72
 APPENDIX A

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS

Please do not write your name but you are requested to consider each question

seriously and give the information you are asked as honestly as possible.

Put a tick between the brackets against the most suitable answer(s) you have chosen.

1: Gender. Male Female

2 Your age: a) 20-30yrs b) 31-40 yrs c) 41-50 yrs

d) over 50yrs

3. Your academic qualification?

a) Diploma b) Degree c) Masters d) Others

4. How long have you taught business studies?

a). Less than 12 months.

b). 1-5 years

c). 6-10 years.

d). 11-15 years.

e) 16-20 year

f.) 21 and above years.

5. What is the average number of students in the classes that you teach?

a). Below 30

b) 31-45

c) 45 and above

73
Section B: Availability and use of community resources.

6. In what area is your secondary school situated?

a). Urban

b) Rural

7. During business studies lessons you have

a). All the teaching/learning resources.

b) .Most of the teaching/learning resources.

c) .A few teaching/learning resources.

d). None of the teaching/learning resources.

8. What is your view about the community resources surrounding your school?

a). Very rich in resources.

b) .Rich in resources.

c) .Little to be noticed.

d) .Poor in resources.

e) .Hardly any resources.

9. What are the major activities of the community in which the school is situated?

(Can give more than one answer).

a). Commercial.

b). Agricultural.

c) Industrial.

d) Social.

e) Others (please specify)...........................................

10. Below, you are provided with a list of people and activities that are commonly

found in other districts. Tick against any that is found in your district. (More than one

answer allowed.).

74
 a. Banks

b. Insurance companies.

c. Manufacturing companies.

d. Warehousing.

e. Wholesalers.

f. Open air markets.

g. Shops/commercial stores.

h. Post office.

i. Accountants.

j. Entrepreneurs/small scale business people.

k. Airport

l. Ports

m. Railway station.

n. Agricultural firms

Section B. Extent to which community resources have been utilized.

11. Does your school have a guideline for selection of resources in the community for

teaching?

a) Yes.

b) No.

12. How often do you use the following community resources to teach business

studies?

75
Resources Regularly Occasionally Never

Trips to nearby school.

Trips far from school.

Exhibitions/international
trade fair
Resources persons

Case study.

13. Which of the following methods do you often use when teaching business studies

in your school? (More than one answer allowed).

a) Lectures

b) Demonstration

c) Using invited speakers

d) Visual aids

e) Dramatising

f) Field trips to the local community

14. Business education teacher can make learning experiences more relevant by:
(More than one answer allowed)
a) Giving students theoretical knowledge which they will apply later in life
b) Using materials recommended by Kenya institute of education.
c) Providing firsthand information by letting them interact freely with the local
environment.
d) Teaching them in order to pass examinations.

15. Outof the places listed below, which one have you ever visited as abusiness
studies class.

76
 a. Local market
b. Supermarket
c. Manufacturing industry.
d. Processing industry.
e. Warehouse.
f. Airport/railway station/seaport.
g. Local bank
h. Insurance company.

16. From the list of people provided below, tick against any that you either visited as a

class or were invited to your business class.

a. Shopkeeper

b. Accountant.

c. Insurer.

d. Banker.

e. Entrepreneur.

f. Salesperson.

Section C: Challenges faced in using Community Resources.

17. What is your reaction to the following statement? As a business studies teacher,

you do not make adequate and effective use of community resources during lessons.

a) It is true.

b) It is not true.

C) Sometimes I use community resources.

If your answer to question 13 is either A or C or both, why is that you do not use these

resources.

77
 Indicate by using the following keys: Strongly Agree (SA) Agree (A), Undecided (U),

Disagree (D) and Strongly Disagree (SD).

Tick as appropriate.

SA A UD D SD
Q. Do you agree with the following statements?
13. There are inadequate community resources around
my school.
14. There is lack of time to use community resources.
15. In my opinion students lack interest when community
resources are used.
16. There is over enrolment of students in my school.
17. There is lack of support from the school authorities in
funding community resources.
18. Parents do not like seeing students of our school
outside the school.
19. Disrupts the timetables and other functions of the
school.
20. It is risky to take students out or to bring strangers.
21. Lack of enough time

22. In your opinion what are some of the challenges facing you as a teacher when

using community resources?

…………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………….

23. Suggest ways in which the above challenges can be overcome.

…………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………

78
 APPENDIX B

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS

All information provided will be treated as confidential.

Please do not write your name but you are required to consider each question

seriously and give the information you are asked for as honestly as possible. Put a tick

between the brackets against the most suitable answer(s) you have chosen.

1. Gender: Male Female

2. During business studies lessons you use (one answer only).

a. All the teaching/ learning materials.

b. Most of the teaching /learning resources.

c. A few teaching /learning resources.

d. none of the teaching/learning materials.

3. What can you say about your district?

a. Rich and full of activities and people in the field of business studies.

b. Has a few activities and people in the field of business studies.

c. Very poor with nothing to be noticed.

4. Below, you are provided with a list of people and activities that are commonly

found in other districts. Tick against any that is found in your district. (More than one

answer allowed.).

a. Banks

b. Insurance companies.

c. Manufacturing companies.

d. Warehousing.

e. Wholesalers.

79
 f. Open air markets.

g. Shops/commercial stores.

h. Post office.

i. Accountants.

j. Entrepreneurs/small scale business people.

k. Airport

l. Ports

m. Railway station.

5. React to this statement, "your business studies teacher does not like to make use of

people, activities and other items found in your district."

a) It's true

b). It is not true.

c). Sometimes she/he uses them.

6. From the list of people provided below, tick against any that you either visited as a

class or were invited to your business class.

a. Shopkeeper

b. Accountant.

c. Insurer.

d. Banker.

e. Transporters.

f. Salesperson.

80
7. Out of the places listed below, which one did you ever visit as business studies

students?

a. Local market

b. Supermarket.

c. Manufacturing industry.

d. Processing industry.

e. Warehouse.

f. Airport/railway station/seaport

g. Exhibition displays.

h. Local bank.

i. Insurance company.

j. Agricultural shows.

8. How often does your class and your business studies teacher make use of the

following?

Regularly. Occasionally. Never.

Practical activities.

Use of written materials like

magazines and newspapers.

Field trips.

Resource persons

9. In your opinion, what additional information would you like to share with the

researcher on use of community resources in business studies?..................................

..........................................................................................................................................

81
 APPENDIX C

INTERVIEW GUIDE FOR PRINCIPALS

1. Age category in years. Below 30yrs( ), 31-40yrs( ) 41 & above( )

2. Gender Male( ) Female( )

3. How many years have you been an educational administrator in this school?

...........................................................................................................................

4. What is the size of the school in terms of enrolment?..........................................

5. What is the average number of pupils in each class?..........................................

6. Who are the sponsors of the school?....................................................................

7. What are the major activities of the community in which the school is

situated?...........................................................................................................

8. In your opinion is the school surrounded by community resources that can be

used to teach business studies? …………………………………………………

9. Does your school have a guideline on how to select resources in the

community for teaching?

10. Do you think there should be an active exchange of ideas and activities

between the school and the surrounding community?

11. In your opinion, do teachers of business studies use community resources

when teaching business studies? Yes No

Give reasons for your answer..........................................................................

12. How would you rate the interpersonal relationships of all the stakeholders in

your school? Teachers versus students/BOG/parents/other teachers. Good

82
 Bad.

13. Does it contribute to use of community resources..............................................

............................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................

14. Which methods are commonly used by teachers when covering the syllabus in

your school?.........................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................

............................................................................................................................

..............................................................................................................................

15. How often do teachers in your school approach you for the guidance regarding

the use of resources in the community for teaching?..........................................

...........................................................................................................................

16. Does your school face any challenges when it strives to use community

resources for teaching? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes state them.

………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………..................

17. If any, give your suggestions on how to overcome the above problems.

.......................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................................

83
 APPENDIX D

SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN RUIRU 2012

1. Githurai mixed
2. Githunguri mixed
3. Kitamaiyu mixed
4. Kwihota mixed
5. Matopeni.
6. Murera.
7. Ruiru Girls.
8. Ruiru Secondary.
9. Blessed Mugutha.
10. Gitothu
11. Wankan
12. St LucieKeriri.
13. St Triza.
14. St Linda
15. Citi Science
16. Cardinal Otunga.
17. Ruiru Star.
18. Blessed Hands.
19. Victorian Girls.
20. Paresia Victory Academy
21. Lindsar Mixed high.
22. St Stephen Koma high.

84
 APPENDIX E

PROJECTED ESTIMATED BUDGET

ITEM. APPROXIMATED AMOUNT

Stationary. 10,000

Secretarial. 15000

Photocopying 5000

Binding of thesis 3000

Transport. 8000

Internet surfing. 5000

Miscellaneous. 2500

TOTAL 48,500

85
 APPENDIX F

TIME SCHEDULE

ACTIVITY DATE

Selection of study title September 2011

Writing proposal January 2012-April 2012

Submission of proposal May 2012

Defence at the department level July 2012

Collection of data September 2013

Analysis and compiling of findings April 2014

Submission of Thesis September 2014

86