SEA4.Solar Water Heater Implementation
SEA4.Solar Water Heater Implementation
SEA4.Solar Water Heater Implementation
From a city and national perspective this reduction will have the following benefits:
● The reduction in residential power use will improve the energy security of a city as it needs
to draw down less power from the grid supply.
● The reduction in demand (during peak times in particular) from the residential sector means
that fewer power stations need to be planned for in the future. Eskom has recognized that
solar water heaters will play a major role in its demand side management (DSM) pro-
gramme.
● Jobs will be created in the solar water heater industry – both in manufacturing and system
installation. Employment creation is a huge national and city priority.
20000 16318
direct jobs
15000
8733
10000
3778
5000 952 1341
80 130 700
0
ol
r
el
Ts
as
H
al
s
ea
an
ga
s
SW
co
og
E
ie
cl
th
R
od
nu
Bi
oe
Bi
Bi
technology
For households, a solar water heater (SWH) also has several benefits:
● Water heating costs for a mid- Cumulative Savings from the Installation of a Solar Water
high income household can be Heater (unsubsidised)
reduced by some 60% with a R 30,000.00
SWH. This amounts to about a R 25,000.00
25 to 30% saving on an average R 20,000.00
R 15,000.00
monthly electricity bill. With the
R 10,000.00
price of electricity projected to R 5,000.00
increase sharply in the next few R 0.00
years, this adds up to a lot of R -5,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
money saved over time. R -10,000.00
R -15,000.00
R -20,000.00
● From an environmental perspec-
Years
tive, water will be heated mostly
Loan Repayments Electricity Saved Cumulative Savings
by the sun reducing a house-
hold’s CO2 emissions by about
Savings in electricity costs can be used to offset the additional
2.6 tons per year (Eskom). A cost of a SWH. Depending on the system used and the amount
useful comparison is if an aver- of hot water required by a household, studies show that a SWH
age family car drives 7800km, it will pay for itself in electricity saved over a 4 – 8 year period.
will produce the same amount of After that, all savings from the SWH will be cash in the pocket
for the homeowner.
CO2.
● Improved quality of life and a reduction in electricity costs can be expected in a low income
household, where energy costs are often a large component of household expenditure and
the SWH may replace the use of “dirtier” fuels, such as paraffin, for water heating.
A solar water heater comprises three main parts: the collector, the storage tank and an energy trans-
fer fluid.
Solar water heaters are classified as either active or passive and direct or indirect systems. They may
make use of either flat plate collectors or evacuated tubes. Below the differences are briefly dis-
cussed.
Storage Tank
Photo: Solar Heat Exchangers
Collector
Active vs passive
Active: Uses a pump to circulate the fluid/water between the collector and the storage tank.
Passive: Uses natural convection (thermosiphon) to circulate the fluid/water between the collector
and the storage tank.
Direct: The collector heats the water directly and the water then circulates between the collector
and the storage tank. A direct system can only be used in areas which are frost and lime
free, without treated or borehole water.
Indirect: The water is stored in the storage tank, and is heated by a heat transfer fluid. This is
heated in the collector and flows around a jacket which surrounds the tank and thereby
heats the water. An indirect system can be used in all conditions.
*
Much of this information was drawn from the Solar Heat Specialist Handbook
Evacuated-tube collectors: This comprises a closed glass tube, inside which is a metal absorber sheet
with a heat pipe in the middle, containing the heat transfer fluid. Evacuated tubes are a newer
technology manufactured mostly in China. Generally evacuated tubes have exceptional performance
but have not yet had time to establish a track record of reliability.
Photo: Solar Heat Exchangers
Installation methods
Close coupled system: This is the most energy efficient and most commonly used installation. It
consists of a roof-mounted solar collector, combined with a horizontally-mounted storage tank
which is located immediately above the collector.
Photo: Solar Heat Exchangers
Collector
3,600
3,400
3,200
3,000
These targets are similar to those 2,800
2,600
3,400
Due to the high use of electricity for water heating in this income group, a SWH rollout will work
financially as the system will begin to pay for itself over a short period of time.
SWH cumulative cashflow to achieve 50% installation Net Present Value (10%
in med-hi income houses by 2020 -Tshwane discount rate):
(unsubsidised) 5yrs: R27,237,517
10yrs: R117,706,744
20yrs: R716,574,919
R 8,000,000,000 Electricity savings
R 6,000,000,000 Loan Repayments
Total Savings
R 4,000,000,000
R 2,000,000,000
This graph shows the
R0 total project financial vi-
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
R -2,000,000,000 ability
R -4,000,000,000
Assumptions: Systems cost R10000 paid back over 10yrs @12% p.a., electricity price increase of
5% p.a., SWH price increase of 5% p.a.
Here the project does not look viable due to the relatively low use of electricity and other fuels for
water heating purposes.
Assumptions: System cost R6000 paid back over 10yrs @12% p.a., electricity price increase of
5% p.a., SWH price increase of 5% p.a.
R 1,000,000,000
R0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
R -1,000,000,000
R -2,000,000,000
Assumptions: System cost R3000 (subsidized) + R3000 paid back over 10yrs @12% p.a., elec-
tricity price increase of 5% p.a., SWH price increase of 5% p.a.
It should be noted that good quality, small (55litre) solar water heaters are available for around
R3000 fully installed. The graph above shows that if these systems were installed instead of the lar-
ger and more expensive ones modeled, the rollout would be financially viable, even without being
subsidized.
● Negative safety and health impacts and costs of water heating using dangerous and dirty fuels
such as paraffin.
● Increased affordability of SWHs as incomes rise and economies of scale bring SWH costs down.
● Opportunity cost of time for a person to heat water using more ‘traditional’ fuels, such as wood.
● Potential for peak load reduction, and avoiding network capacity constraint that accompanies
the common use of kettles for water heating in low income houses.
● Likely Eskom subsidy for SWHs is expected to improve their affordability significantly.
From a simple economic as well as welfare point of view, therefore, it seems that SWHs in the low
income sector should remain a strong focus, and innovative solutions to rollout should be further
explored.
Various barriers have hindered the full-scale implementation of solar water heaters. These include:
Financing/low electricity prices: South Africa has one of the lowest electricity prices in the world.
This means that the SWH system payback period is longer than most households are prepared to
consider. In addition, systems are expensive, partly because the industry is still a relatively small
one, and economies of scale are not realised.
Standards: The standards for SWH’s have until recent years been voluntary and will remain so in
the next few years. However projects and clients can enforce compliance with South African Na-
tional Standard (SANS) 1307 which will regulate the quality of systems. In 2007 the South African
Bureau of Standards (SABS) purchased a SWH test rig which can accurately test systems against
SANS 1307, and manufacturers are becoming compliant against with standard.
Trained plumbers and installers: There is a lack of trained plumbers and installers who are qualified
to install solar water heaters in South Africa, particularly if there is going to be a radical growth in
the market over the next few years. The Central Energy Fund (CEF) has launched training programs
through various training providers and a registered qualification through the South African qualifi-
cation authority exists.
Awareness: There is a lack of general awareness of the benefits of solar water heaters.
Long term support from government: There are currently no subsidy or incentive schemes to entice
consumers to purchase a solar water heater (although a significant subsidy from the Eskom DSM
fund seems likely).
This mechanism is attractive because the hot water user (house/ hospital etc) bears no capital costs
and doesn’t worry about the maintenance of the system. Although in the long run users will pay
more than if they bought and installed a system themselves, this mechanism works well as it avoids
prohibitive capital costs and is relatively ‘hassle free’ (no maintenance, repair, responsibility etc).
This provides a useful mechanism for cities to consider implementing within their own facilities
(council housing schemes, public facilities, large buildings, etc). Within the residential or commer-
cial sector cities could play a role in supporting fee for service mechanisms through administering
and collecting the monthly tariff (service fee) on the ESCO’s behalf, through their established rates
collection process.
Note: The
CDM Finances and Big financiers (eg DBSA) ESCO could be
grants/subsidies a private firm
contracted by
city, or a city
owned SWH
Repayments Loans utility
Houses
The Metro will support these projects on two levels. They will provide financial support through the
negotiation of pricing structures that will ensure the projects’ financial viability. They will also pro-
vide administrative support, such as the inclusion of relevant projects within the municipal billing
system.
The basic premise underlying the model is that the Metro will not incur any costs other than the
purchase of ‘green’ electricity (at a premium). It will make use of supplementary finance mecha-
nisms available to green energy, to offset the cost of this electricity and in so doing reduce the price
differential between renewable energy and Eskom grid electricity.
Once the system is up and running, a TREC can be issued to anyone who displaces 1MWh of con-
ventionally generated ‘dirty’ grid electricity (e.g. through installing solar water heaters) or anyone
who generates 1MW-hr of ‘clean’ electricity (e.g. a wind farm). This certificate can then be sold on
the open market to individuals or businesses who want to ‘green’ their electricity consumption.
The number of REC’s a consumer receives is calculated as displaced energy over 10 years, based
on the daily sunlight hours and system efficiency.
Through adopting this simple demand pull system the return on investment for the end user has
dramatically increased, and demand has grown, assisting government towards reaching their
mandatory renewable energy target. For more information please visit:
http://www.bcse.org.au/default.asp?id=289
http://www.orer.gov.au/publications/mret-overview.html
http://www.orer.gov.au/recs/index.html
In terms of satisfying the community need for hot water, 305 SWHs were installed (without electric-
ity back-up) to provide hot water. Provision of SWHs was made possible through the local authority
securing a low interest loan from the Development Bank of Southern Africa. Residents paid a fixed
rate for hot water as a way of servicing the loan. The SWHs are mounted on stands on the existing
rooftops in order to receive the best orientation (north) for the heating of the panels.
Initially the community expressed a high level of satisfaction with the hot water service. A survey
conducted in 2003 found residents continuing to use the SWHs, but complained of heaters not heat-
ing water sufficiently over the cold rainy winter months of the Cape. Systematic maintenance did
not seem to be taking place either.
The SWH systems are now owned by the City of Cape Town, and residents/tenants continue to pay
a fixed monthly rental fee (the monthly rental fee increased from R17.50 to R23 by 2003) included
in their monthly rent to cover the repayments on the capital cost of the SWHs. As regards the cur-
rent situation, little is known, except for anecdotal evidence of some systems being broken or in
need of maintenance. Momentum around this project has ceased and the City of Cape Town should
be encouraged to assess the current status and develop a plan to take project forward to a more sus-
tainable situation.
Photo: Suntank
Photo: Suntank
Large scale solar water heating on mid- Solar water heating on retirement centre
high income Durban apartment block