Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 104 views

    Complaint: Municipal Trial Court of Daet

    Uploaded by

    Ronbert Alindogan Ramos
    Rolando Saa filed a complaint against Roy Tabara for estafa under Article 315(2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code. According to the complaint, Tabara falsely pretended to be a surveyor named Jose Tabara and received P47,000 from Saa for surveying and relocation plans. However, Tabara did not perform any work and refused to return the money despite demands, damaging Saa. Saa later discovered that Tabara was not actually a surveyor and was only related to the real surveyor Jose Tabara.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Complaint: Municipal Trial Court of Daet

    Uploaded by

    Ronbert Alindogan Ramos
    104 views4 pages
    Rolando Saa filed a complaint against Roy Tabara for estafa under Article 315(2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code. According to the complaint, Tabara falsely pretended to be a surveyor named Jose Tabara and received P47,000 from Saa for surveying and relocation plans. However, Tabara did not perform any work and refused to return the money despite demands, damaging Saa. Saa later discovered that Tabara was not actually a surveyor and was only related to the real surveyor Jose Tabara.

    Original Title

    SAA Compliant

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Rolando Saa filed a complaint against Roy Tabara for estafa under Article 315(2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code. According to the complaint, Tabara falsely pretended to be a surveyor named Jose Tabara and received P47,000 from Saa for surveying and relocation plans. However, Tabara did not perform any work and refused to return the money despite demands, damaging Saa. Saa later discovered that Tabara was not actually a surveyor and was only related to the real surveyor Jose Tabara.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    104 views4 pages

    Complaint: Municipal Trial Court of Daet

    Uploaded by

    Ronbert Alindogan Ramos
    Rolando Saa filed a complaint against Roy Tabara for estafa under Article 315(2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code. According to the complaint, Tabara falsely pretended to be a surveyor named Jose Tabara and received P47,000 from Saa for surveying and relocation plans. However, Tabara did not perform any work and refused to return the money despite demands, damaging Saa. Saa later discovered that Tabara was not actually a surveyor and was only related to the real surveyor Jose Tabara.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Republic of the Philippines

    FIFTH JUDICIAL REGION


    MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF DAET
    Branch ____
    Daet, Camarines Norte

    ROLANDO SAA CRIMINAL CASE NO. ________


    Complainant,

    - versus -

    ROY TABARA FOR: ESTAFA under Art. 315 (2)(a)


    Accused, of the Revised Penal Code
    x----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

    COMPLAINT
    The undersigned complainant hereby accuses ROY TABARA of Daet,
    Camarines Norte of the crime of Estafa under Art. 315 (2)(a) of the Revised
    Penal Code, committed as follows:

    “That on or about April 26, 2018 in the Municipality of Daet,


    Province of Camarines Norte, and within the jurisdiction of this
    Honorable Court, the above–named accused, with grave abuse of
    trust and confidence and intent to gain, did there and there,
    willfully, unlawfully and feloniously make false pretenses to the
    herein private complainant when he acted and pretended as a
    surveyor by the name of JOSE TABARA, and by reason of said
    false pretense, the accused received the total amount of
    (P47,000.00) FORTY SEVEN THOUSAND PESOS as payment for
    the surveying and relocation plans, when in truth and in fact, the
    accused is not the real JOSE TABARA and neither is he a surveyor
    and consequently was not able to produce any outputs regarding
    the surveying and relocation plans of complainant’s property and
    despite repeated demands upon the accused to perform its
    obligation to deliver the aforementioned plans, the accused
    deliberately failed, refused and continue to fail and refuse to
    deliver the same to the damage and prejudice of the herein private
    complainant.”

    CONTRARY TO LAW.

    Daet, Camarines Norte, March 10, 2020.

    ROLANDO SAA
    Complainant
    Brgy. Mataque, Capalonga,
    Camarines Norte
    WITNESSES:

    1. Complainant Rolando Saa

    EXHIBITS:

    1. Sinumpaang Salaysay ng Reklamo


    2. Official Receipts
    3. Demand Letter

    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 10th day of March 2020


    at Daet, Camarines Norte, Philippines.
    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )
    Province of Camarines Norte )
    Municipality of Daet ) S.S.

    SINUMPAANG SALAYSAY NG REKLAMO

    Ako, si ROLANDO SAA, may sapat na gulang, Pilipino, at naninirahan sa


    Brgy. Mataque, Capalonga, Camarines Norte, matapos manumpa ng naaayon
    sa batas ay nagsasasabi:

    Na ako ang private complainant sa kasong aking isinampa laban kay


    ROY TABARA sa kasong Estafa o paglabag sa Art. 315 (2) (a) ng Revised Penal
    Code;

    Na noong buwan ng April at Mayo, 2018 ay nagkipagkita ako kay ROY


    TABARA sa Daet, Camarines Norte at nakipagkasundo sa kanya upang siya na
    ang magsurvey at mag-parelocate ng aking pag-aaring lupa na matatagpuan
    sa bayan ng Capalonga, Camarines Norte;

    Na matapos ko siyang bayaran at upang pagtibayin ang aming


    kasunduan ay nagbigay pa si Roy Tabara ng mga resibo sa mga halagang
    (P10,000.00) sampung libong piso, (P20,000.00) Dalampung libong piso at
    (P17,000.00) labinpitong libong piso;

    Na matapos kong i-abot ang mga nasabing halaga kay Roy Tabara ay
    hindi ko na siya nakitang muli. Kaya ako’y nagtungo sa kanyang bahay sa
    Tagas upang bigyang linaw ang kanyang biglaang pagkawala.

    Na aking napag-alaman na hindi pala surveyor si Roy Tabara bagkus


    siya ay kamag-anak lamang ni Jose Tabara na siyang lehitimo at lisensyadong
    surveyor at dahil sa kanyang kasinungalingan ay hindi niya natupad ang
    aming napagkasunduang survey plan;

    Na dahil sa panloloko at pagpapanggap ni Roy Tabara, ako ay kanyang


    nalinlang at hindi na isinauli ang perang aking ibinayad na nagkakahalagang
    apatnaput pitong libong piso P47,000.00.

    SA KATUNAYAN NG LAHAT NG ITO ay aking nilagdaan ang salaysay na


    ito ngayong ika-10 ng Marso, 2020 dito sa bayan ng Daet, Camarines Norte.

    ROLANDO SAA
    Complainant

    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 10th day of March 2020


    in daet, Camarines Norte, affiant exhibited his OSCA ID No.16-1979 as
    competent evidence of identity.

    Doc No. ____ NOTARY PUBLIC


    Page No. ____
    Book No. ____
    Series of 2020

    You might also like