RTI Second Appeal Kachiguda Police Station
RTI Second Appeal Kachiguda Police Station
RTI Second Appeal Kachiguda Police Station
Appeal before
As I am aggrieved by decision of State Public Information Officer and First Appellate authority, I
hereby file this appeal for your kind decision.
1. Details of appellant:
3. Details of First Appellate Authority [FAA]: Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Kachiguda Divn,East Zone,Hyd
3.1 Name/Designation of the FAA: Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Kachiguda Divn,East Zone,Hyd
3.2 Full Address of FAA: Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda Divn,
East Zone,Osmania University, Hyderabad – 500 007.
4. Dates of RTI application/first appeal:
5. Particulars of Decisions:
1. To get a certified copy of F.I.R, charge sheet, Evidence recorded in the case registered
against Chandrashekar Mawle and others in the month of September, year 1979.Kindly
provide me the documents of the same urgently.
3. To instruct the CPIO to give a copy of the destruction certificate if the said records are
destroyed.
5. Please provide me certified photocopy of pages of registers where the said records were
last recorded to have existed. Name, designation and office address of the officers and
other staff of the office who had last custody of the said records.
6. Date when the office first came to know that the said records are missing.
7. Details of efforts made to trace out the said records till date of your reply. Certified copy
of FIR filed for the missing/non-tracing of said records. In case if FIR is not filed till date
of your reply to this application, reasons for it be also made known to me.
9. Certified photocopy of report made by your office to your higher officers and their
reply on the matter of the said records.
10. Details of departmental action initiated against erring staff for the said records.
11. Certified photocopy of last audit queries and replies thereto in connection to said
records.
12. Certified copy of record evidencing last periodical verification/inventory of old records
undertaken by the dept/office as per prescribed procedure. If no inventory/verification
is undertaken, reasons thereof be made known to me.
13. Name, designation and full address of PIO of the office where additional/duplicate
copies would be available of the said record.
14. Please let me know if it is possible to retrieve the said record from computers.
15. Please provide me a sworn affidavit to this effect. [refer: CIC decision dated 06-11-2009
in Appeal No.CIC/SM/A/2008/00135 & SM/A/2009/001075].
I had applied to the Information officer cum SHO, Kachiguda Police Station to get a certified
copy of F.I.R, charge sheet, Evidence recorded in the case registered against Chandrashekar
Mawle and others in the month of September, year 1979, under the RTI Act 2005, as per my
application dated 16-05-2012. The application was accompanied by IPO of Rs. 10.00 (Nr 98E
212409), as payment for application fees.
The Information officer cum SHO replied to me vide Letter No. Lr.No.205/IKCG/OW/2012
dated 01.06.2012 and informed me that “no record was found pertaining to the year 1979,
since it was very old records. As such we cannot provide the same”.
I appealed the same with the appellate authority but did not receive satisfactory reply.
Information has not been given to me and the replies thereof are not satisfactory.
The SPIO has informed that he does not wish to comment on some of my questions.
2) To instruct the SPIO, in writing, to provide me the information “free of charge” as per
Sec 7(6) of the RTI Act, since the information has been delayed beyond the mandated 30
days, as prescribed in Sec 7(1) of the RTI act.
4) I demand imposition of Penalty under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act, at the rate of Rs. 250.00
for every day of delay (subject to a maximum of Rs. 25,000.00) from the date the
information was due (16th June 2009) till the date the information is actually given to me.
5) As per Sec 19(5) of the RTI Act 2005, during the appeal proceedings, the SPIO & the
appellate authority, should be asked to explain their “deemed” denial of request for
information, since the onus to prove that the denial of request was justified, is on the SPIO
& the appellate authority.
14. Declaration:
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Place: Hyderabad
INDEX OF APPEAL
The application was accompanied by IPO of Rs. 10.00 (Nr 98E 212409).
7. Postal A.D. card/Acknowledgement letter, received from SPIO & FAA 01/06/2012 &
23/07/2012
Place: Hyderabad
Place: Hyderabad