The Docrtine or Plea of Non Est Factum
The Docrtine or Plea of Non Est Factum
The Docrtine or Plea of Non Est Factum
The doctrine of non est factum ( latin for “not my deed “) Is a common law doctrine that can allow
the signer of a legal document to escape the usual legal consequences of the signature . In its early
days , non est factum was available only to blind and illiterate person who without being careless , relied
another party’s flamed explanation of the document . Non est factum can void contract.
Non est factum is a Defence in a contract law that allows a signing party to escape performance of an
agreement which is fundamentally different from what he or she is intended to execute or sign. A claim
of non est factum means that the signature on the contract was signed by the mistake .
Non est factum . Can be described as a doctrine in the sense that it is part of the law or as a plea in the
sense of an attempt by a particular signer to invoke the doctrine .
The doctrine of non est factum was exemplified in THOROUGHHOOD’S CASE (1854) . In this case Mr
Thoroughhood’s tenant , Mr William Chicken , owed areas of rent . Mr Thoroughhood intended to free
him from liability and document was created to that effect . The document that was created however
was one that transfered the property to Mr William . Mr Thoroughood was an illiterate and he has
asked Mr Chicken what the document entailed Mr Chicken misrepresented to him that the document
was an document to cancel arrears of rent Thus , Mr Thoroughood signed it . Subsequently, Mr Chicken
sold the property to an innocent third party.
The court held that the principle of non est factum would apply hear since considering the fact that
Mr Thoroughood was an illiterate and he made enquiries as to what purpose the document was for .
Thus the deed of transfer to Mr Chicken was void .
According to Saunders v Anglia Building Society [ 1971] applied in Petelin v Callen [1975] the strict
requirements necessary plea are generally that
(a) The person pleading non est factum must belong to class of persons who brought no fault
of their own are unable to have any understanding of the purpose of the particular
document because of blindness, illiteracy or some other disability . The disability must be
one requiring the reliance on others for advice as to what they are signing .
(b) The signatory must have made a fundamental mistake as to the nature of the contents of
the document being signed including its practical effect
(c) The document must have been radically different from one intended to be signed .