Determining Hardenability of Steel: Standard Test Methods For
Determining Hardenability of Steel: Standard Test Methods For
Determining Hardenability of Steel: Standard Test Methods For
1
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 1 Normalizing and Austenitizing TemperaturesA results. It is important to heat the specimen in such an
Normalizing Austenitizing atmosphere that practically no scaling and a minimum of
Steel Series Ordered Carbon Temperature, °F Temperature, °F decarburization takes place. This may be accomplished by
Content, max, % (°C) (°C)
heating the specimen in a vertical position in a container with
1000, 1300, 1500, 0.25 and under 1700 (925) 1700 (925)
3100, 4000, 4100
an easily removable cover containing a layer of cast-iron chips
4300, 4400, 4500, 0.26 to 0.36, incl 1650 (900) 1600 (870) with the bottom face of the specimen resting on the chips.
4600, 4700, 5000, 6.2.1 Other methods consist of placing the specimen in an
5100, 6100,B 8100,
8600, 8700, 8800, appropriately sized hole in a graphite block or placing the
9400, 9700, 9800 specimen in an upright tube attached to a flat base, both of a
0.37 and over 1600 (870) 1550 (845)
2300, 2500, 3300, 0.25 and under 1700 (925) 1550 (845)
heat-resistant metal, with the collar projecting for a tong hold.
4800, 9300 Place a disk of graphite or carbon, or a layer of carbonaceous
0.26 to 0.36, incl 1650 (900) 1500 (815) material such as charcoal, in the bottom of the tube to prevent
0.37 and over 1600 (870) 1475 (800)
9200 0.50 and over 1650 (900) 1600 (870)
scaling.
A
A variation of 610°F (6°C) from the temperatures in this table is permissible.
6.2.2 For a particular fixture and furnace, determine the time
B
Normalizing and austenitizing temperatures are 50°F (30°C) higher for the required to heat the specimen to the austenitizing temperature
6100 series. by inserting a thermocouple into a hole drilled axially in the top
of the specimen. Repeat this procedure periodically, for ex-
5. Test Specimens ample once a month, for each combination of fixture and
5.1 Wrought Specimens—End-quench specimens shall be furnace.
prepared from rolled or forged stock and shall represent the full 6.3 Quenching—Adjust the water-quenching device so that
cross section of the product. If negotiated between the supplier the stream of water rises to a free height of 2.5 in. (63.5 mm)
and the user, the end-quench specimen may be prepared from above the 0.5-in. (12.7-mm) orifice, without the specimen in
a given location in a forged or rolled product or from a position. The support for the specimen shall be dry at the
continuous cast billet. The test specimen shall be 1.0 in. (25.4 beginning of each test. Then place the heated specimen in the
mm) in diameter by 4.0 in. (101.6 mm) in length, with means support so that its bottom face is 0.5 in. above the orifice, and
for hanging it in a vertical position for end quenching. turn on the water by means of the quick-opening valve. The
Dimensions of the preferred specimen and of an optional time between removal of the specimen from the furnace and
specimen (Note 2) are given in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The specimen the beginning of the quench should not be more than 5 s. Direct
shall be machined from a bar previously normalized in the stream of water, at a temperature of 40 to 85°F (5 to 30°C),
accordance with 6.1 and of such size as to permit the removal against the bottom face of the specimen for not less than 10
of all decarburization in machining to 1.0 in. round. The end of min. Maintain a condition of still air around the specimen
the specimen to be water cooled shall have a reasonably during cooling. If the specimen is not cold when removed from
smooth finish, preferably produced by grinding. Normalizing the fixture, immediately quench it in water.
may be waived by agreement between the supplier and the 6.4 Hardness Measurement—Two flats 180° apart shall be
user. The previous thermal history of the specimen tested shall ground to a minimum depth of 0.015 in. (0.38 mm) along the
always be recorded. entire length of the bar and Rockwell C hardness measure-
5.2 Cast Specimens—A separately cast end-quench speci- ments made along the length of the bar. Shallower ground
men may be used for non-boron steels. Cast specimens are not depths can affect reproducibility of results, and correlation with
suitable for boron steel grades due to erratic results. A graphite cooling rates in quenched bars.
or metal mold may be used to form an overlength specimen 1.0 6.4.1 The preparation of the two flats must be carried out
in. (25.4 mm) in diameter which shall be cut to the standard with considerable care. They should be mutually parallel and
specimen size. The mold may also be used to form a 1.25-in. the grinding done in such a manner that no change of the
(31.8-mm) diameter specimen which shall be machined to the quenched structure takes place. Very light cuts with water
final specimen size. Cast tests need not be normalized. cooling and a coarse, soft-grinding wheel are recommended to
NOTE 2—Other sizes and shapes of test specimens are described in avoid heating the specimen. In order to detect tempering due to
Appendix X1. grinding, the flat may be etched with one of the following
etchant solutions:
6. Procedure
NOTE 3—5 % nitric acid (concentrated) and 95 % water by volume.
6.1 Normalizing—The wrought product from which the
NOTE 4—50 % hydrochloric acid (concentrated) and 50 % water by
specimen is to be prepared shall be normalized to ensure proper volume.
hardening characteristics. The sample shall be held at the
temperature listed in Table 1 for 1 h and cooled in air. Wash the sample in hot water. Etch in solution No. 1 until
Tempering of the normalized sample to improve machinability black. Wash in hot water. Immerse in solution No. 2 for 3 s and
is permitted. wash in hot water. Dry in air blast.
6.2 Heating—Place the specimen in a furnace that is at the 6.4.1.1 The presence of lighter or darker areas indicates that
specified austenitizing temperature (Table 1) and hold at this hardness and structure have been altered in grinding. If such
temperature for 30 min. In production testing slightly longer changes caused by grinding are indicated, new flats may be
times up to 35 min may be used without appreciably affecting prepared.
2
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
6.4.2 When hardness tests are made, the test specimen rests 6.4.2.1 The Rockwell tester should periodically be checked
on one of its flats on an anvil firmly attached to the hardness against standard test blocks. It is recommended that a test block
machine. It is important that no vertical movement be allowed be interposed between the specimen and the indenter to check
when the major load is applied. The anvil must be constructed the seating of the indenter and the specimen simultaneously.
to move the test specimen past the penetrator in accurate steps For general statements regarding the use of test blocks and
of 1⁄16 in. (1.5 mm). Resting the specimen in a V-block is not surface conditions, reference should be made to 4.7 and 5.2,
permitted. respectively, of Test Methods E 18.
3
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
6.4.3 Exercise care in registering the point of the indenter in 9.1.1 Previous thermal history of the specimen tested, in-
relationship to the quenched end of the specimen as well as cluding the temperature of normalizing and austenitizing,
providing for accurate spacing between indentations. A low- 9.1.2 Chemical Composition,
power measuring microscope is suitable for use in determining 9.1.3 ASTM grain size (McQuaid-Ehn) as determined by
the distance from the quenched end to the center of the first Test Methods E 112, unless otherwise indicated, and
impression and in checking the distance from center to center 9.1.4 A prominent notation on the standard hardenability
of the succeeding impressions. It has been found that with chart if any of the test specimens listed in Appendix X1 are
reasonable operating care and a well-built fixture, it is practical used.
to locate the center of the first impression 0.0625 6 0.004 in.
(1.5 6 0.10 mm) from the quenched end. The variations CALCULATION OF HARDENABILITY
between spacings should be even smaller. Obviously, it is more
important to position the indenter accurately when testing 10. Introduction
low-hardenability steels than when testing high-hardenability 10.1 This method of Jominy Hardenability calculation from
steels. The positioning of the indenter should be checked with the chemical ideal diameter (DI) on a steel is based on the
sufficient frequency to provide assurance that accuracy require- original work of M. A. Grossman and provides increased
ments are being met. In cases of lack of reproducibility or of accuracy by refinement of the carbon multiplying factors and
differences between laboratories, indenter spacing should be the correlation of a boron factor (B.F.) with carbon and alloy
measured immediately. content. These refinements were based on analysis of thou-
6.4.4 Readings shall be taken in steps of 1⁄16 in. (1.6 mm) sands of heats of boron and non-boron 1500, 4100, 5000, and
for the first 16 sixteenths (25.4 mm), then 18, 20, 22, 24, 28, 8600 series steels encompassing a range of compositions as
and 32 sixteenths of an inch. Values below 20 HRC are not follows and a range of DI as contained in Tables 2-5. The
recorded because such values are not accurate. When a flat on accuracy of this test method and the techniques used to develop
which readings have been made is used as a base, the burrs it have been documented. For comparison of this test method to
around the indentation shall be removed by grinding unless a others, or for steel compositions outside the mentioned grades,
fixture is used which has been relieved to accommodate the the user should refer to other articles concerned with calculat-
irregularities due to the indentations. ing hardenability.
6.4.4.1 Hardness readings should preferably be made on Element Range, %
two flats 180° apart. Testing on two flats will assist in the Carbon 0.10–0.70
detection of errors in specimen preparation and hardness Manganese 0.50–1.65
measurement. If the two probes on opposite sides differ by Silicon 0.15–0.60
Chromium 1.35 max
more than 4 HRC points at any one position, the test should be Nickel 1.50 max
repeated on new flats, 90° from the first two flats. If the retest Molybdenum 0.55 max
also has greater than 4 HRC points spread, a new specimen
should be tested. 10.2 Tables 2-18 are to be used to calculate hardenability
6.4.4.2 For reporting purposes, hardness readings should be from the chemical ideal diameter for the grades shown in 10.1.
recorded to the nearest integer, with 0.5 HRC values rounded Hardenability results are to be reported for the first 10 sixteenth
to the next higher integer. (16 mm), the 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, and 32 sixteenths of an
inch.
7. Plotting Test Results NOTE 5—The reporting of hardenability using the calculated method
7.1 Test results should be plotted on a standard hardenabil- differs from the procedure as shown in 6.4.4
ity chart prepared for this purpose, in which the ordinates 10.3 DI Calculation for Non-Boron Steels—This calcula-
represent HRC values and the abscissae represent the distance tion relies on a series of hardenability factors (Table 6) for each
from the quenched end of the specimen at which the hardness alloying element in the composition which, when multiplied
determinations were made. When hardness readings are taken together, gives a DI value. (For simplicity, only multiplying
on two or more flats, the values at the same distance should be factors for DI in inch–pound units are given. For DI in
averaged and that value used for plotting. A facsimile of the millimetres, use the metric value table.) The effects of phos-
standard ASTM hardenability chart3 on which typical harden- phorous and sulfur are not considered since they tend to cancel
ability curves have been plotted is shown in Fig. 4. one another. A No. 7 austenitic grain size is assumed since most
8. Index of Hardenability steels with hardenability control arc melted to a fine-grain
practice where experience has demonstrated that a high per-
8.1 The hardenability of a steel can be designated by a centage of heats conform to this grain size. An example DI
specific HRC hardness value or HRC hardness value range at calculation is given as follows for an SAE 4118 modified steel:
a given Jominy (“J”) distance. Examples of this method are J
Element % Multiplying Factor
4⁄16 in. (6.4 mm) = 47 HRC min, J 7⁄16 in. (11.1 mm) = 50 Carbon 0.22 0.119
HRC max, and J 5⁄16 in. (7.9 mm) = 38–49 HRC. Manganese 0.80 3.667
Silicon 0.18 1.126
9. Report Nickel 0.10 1.036
Chromium 0.43 1.929
9.1 Report the following information that may be recorded Molybdenum 0.25 1.750
on the ASTM hardenability chart: Copper 0.10 1.040
4
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
FIG. 4 Facsimile of Standard ASTM Hardenability Chart, Showing Typical Hardenability Curves
[Chart Size: 81⁄2 by 11 in. (216 by 279 mm)]
5
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
10.4.6 Calculate the DI with boron as follows: or Table 3 (mm) for non-boron steels or from Table 4 (in.) or
Table 5 (mm) for boron steels.
where: 10.6 For the example non-boron heat with an IH = 45 HRC
DIB = DI (without boron) 3 boron factor and a calculated DI of 1.79 in., the hardness at the respective
DIB = 1.24 in. 3 2.36
end-quench positions can be calculated by dividing 45 by the
DIB = 2.93 in.
appropriate dividing factor listed in Table 2 (in.) for non-boron
10.5 Hardenability Curves from Composition—With a pre- steels. (For simplicity, the DI should be rounded to the nearest
determined DI (DIB for boron steel), the end-quench harden- 0.1 in.).
ability curve can be computed by the following procedure: 10.7 Equations for Tables 2-10—Equations representing a
10.5.1 The initial hardness (IH) at the J = 1⁄16 in. position is least squares polynomial fit of the data contained in Tables
a function of carbon content and independent of hardenability 2-10 are listed in Tables 7-6. The use of these equations to plot
and is selected from Table 7. For the example non-boron SAE curves may result in random inflection points due to the
4118 modified heat containing 0.22 % carbon, the initial characteristics of polynomial equations. These inflections will
hardness is 45 HRC. be minor, however, and should be disregarded.
10.5.2 The hardness at other positions along the end-quench
specimen (termed distance hardness) is determined by dividing 11. Keywords
the initial hardness by the appropriate factor from Table 2 (in.) 11.1 end-quench hardenability; hardenability
6
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 2 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Non-Boron Steels, in.
7
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 3 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Non-Boron Steels, mm
8
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 4 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Boron Steels, in.
9
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 5 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Boron Steels, mm
10
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 6 Multiplying Factors, in.
Carbon-
Grain
% Alloy Mn Si Ni Cr Mo Cu V
Size
7
11
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 6 Continued
Carbon-
Grain
% Alloy Mn Si Ni Cr Mo Cu V
Size
7
12
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 6 Continued
Carbon-
Grain
% Alloy Mn Si Ni Cr Mo Cu V
Size
7
13
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 6 Continued
Carbon-
Grain
% Alloy Mn Si Ni Cr Mo Cu V
Size
7
14
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 8 Jominy Distance for 50 % Martensite versus DI (in.)
“J”
“J” mm DI, mm “J” mm DI, mm mm DI, mm
15
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 10 Boron Factors versus % Carbon and Alloy FactorA
%
Carbon 5 7 9 11 13 15 18 22 26
0.10 6.18 5.38 5.09 4.61 4.28 4.14 3.72 3.68 3.55
0.11 5.76 5.07 4.77 4.35 4.05 3.88 3.54 3.48 3.35
0.12 5.38 4.78 4.48 4.10 3.84 3.65 3.37 3.30 3.18
0.13 5.04 4.52 4.22 3.88 3.64 3.44 3.21 3.14 3.03
0.14 4.72 4.28 3.98 3.68 3.47 3.26 3.07 2.99 2.88
0.15 4.44 4.06 3.77 3.50 3.31 3.09 2.94 2.86 2.76
0.16 4.19 3.86 3.57 3.34 3.16 2.94 2.82 2.74 2.64
0.17 3.96 3.68 3.40 3.19 3.03 2.81 2.71 2.63 2.54
0.18 3.75 3.51 3.24 3.05 2.91 2.70 2.61 2.53 2.44
0.19 3.57 3.36 3.10 2.93 2.80 2.59 2.52 2.44 2.36
0.20 3.40 3.22 2.98 2.82 2.70 2.50 2.43 2.35 2.28
0.21 3.25 3.09 2.86 2.72 2.60 2.42 2.35 2.28 2.20
0.22 3.12 2.98 2.76 2.63 2.52 2.34 2.28 2.20 2.13
0.23 3.00 2.88 2.61 2.55 2.44 2.27 2.21 2.14 2.07
0.24 2.90 2.78 2.59 2.47 2.37 2.21 2.15 2.07 2.01
0.25 2.81 2.70 2.52 2.40 2.30 2.15 2.09 2.01 1.95
0.26 2.73 2.62 2.45 2.34 2.24 2.10 2.03 1.96 1.89
0.27 2.66 2.55 2.39 2.28 2.18 2.05 1.98 1.91 1.84
0.28 2.60 2.49 2.34 2.23 2.13 2.00 1.93 1.86 1.79
0.29 2.54 2.43 2.29 2.18 2.08 1.96 1.88 1.81 1.74
0.30 2.49 2.38 2.24 2.14 2.04 1.92 1.83 1.76 1.70
0.31 2.44 2.33 2.20 2.10 1.99 1.88 1.79 1.72 1.65
0.32 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.06 1.95 1.84 1.74 1.68 1.61
0.33 2.36 2.24 2.12 2.02 1.91 1.80 1.70 1.64 1.57
0.34 2.32 2.20 2.09 1.98 1.87 1.76 1.66 1.60 1.53
0.35 2.29 2.17 2.05 1.95 1.84 1.72 1.63 1.56 1.49
0.36 2.26 2.13 2.02 1.92 1.80 1.69 1.59 1.52 1.45
0.37 2.23 2.10 1.99 1.89 1.77 1.65 1.55 1.49 1.42
0.38 2.20 2.07 1.96 1.85 1.74 1.62 1.52 1.46 1.38
0.39 2.18 2.04 1.93 1.82 1.70 1.58 1.49 1.42 1.35
0.40 2.15 2.01 1.90 1.79 1.67 1.55 1.46 1.39 1.32
0.41 2.12 1.98 1.87 1.76 1.64 1.52 1.43 1.36 1.29
0.42 2.09 1.96 1.84 1.73 1.62 1.49 1.40 1.34 1.26
0.43 2.06 1.93 1.82 1.70 1.58 1.46 1.37 1.31 1.23
0.44 2.04 1.90 1.78 1.68 1.56 1.43 1.35 1.28 1.21
0.45 2.01 1.87 1.75 1.65 1.53 1.40 1.32 1.25 1.19
0.46 1.98 1.85 1.72 1.62 1.51 1.38 1.30 1.23 1.17
0.47 1.94 1.82 1.69 1.59 1.48 1.36 1.28 1.21 1.15
0.48 1.91 1.80 1.67 1.57 1.46 1.34 1.26 1.19 1.13
0.49 1.89 1.77 1.64 1.54 1.43 1.32 1.24 1.17 1.10
0.50 1.87 1.75 1.61 1.51 1.41 1.30 1.22 1.15 1.08
0.51 1.83 1.72 1.58 1.48 1.39 1.27 1.20 1.12 1.06
0.52 1.80 1.70 1.56 1.46 1.37 1.26 1.18 1.10 1.04
0.53 1.77 1.67 1.53 1.44 1.34 1.24 1.16 1.07 1.02
0.54 1.74 1.65 1.51 1.42 1.32 1.23 1.14 1.05 1.00
0.55 1.71 1.62 1.48 1.39 1.30 1.21 1.12 1.02 1.00
0.56 1.68 1.60 1.46 1.37 1.28 1.20 1.10 1.00 1.00
0.57 1.65 1.57 1.44 1.35 1.26 1.18 1.07 1.00 1.00
0.58 1.62 1.55 1.42 1.33 1.24 1.17 1.05 1.00 1.00
0.59 1.60 1.52 1.40 1.31 1.22 1.14 1.02 1.00 1.00
0.60 1.57 1.50 1.38 1.29 1.20 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.61 1.54 1.48 1.36 1.27 1.18 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.62 1.51 1.46 1.34 1.25 1.16 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.63 1.49 1.43 1.32 1.23 1.13 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.64 1.47 1.41 1.30 1.21 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.65 1.45 1.39 1.29 1.19 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.66 1.42 1.37 1.28 1.17 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.67 1.40 1.35 1.26 1.15 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.68 1.38 1.33 1.24 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.69 1.36 1.31 1.22 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.70 1.35 1.28 1.20 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
16
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 10 Continued
%
Carbon 5 7 9 11 13 15 18 22 26
0.71 1.33 1.26 1.18 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.72 1.32 1.25 1.16 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.73 1.30 1.22 1.14 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.74 1.29 1.20 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.75 1.27 1.17 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.76 1.26 1.15 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.77 1.24 1.12 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.78 1.22 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.79 1.20 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.80 1.18 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.81 1.15 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.82 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.83 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.84 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.85 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A
Alloy factor is the product of all the multiplying factors (Table 5) excluding that for carbon.
Carbon/Grain Size 7
Up to 0.39 %, incl MF = 0.54 ( %C)
Over 0.39 to 0.55 %, incl = 0.171 + 0.001 ( %C) + 0.265 ( %C)2
Over 0.55 to 0.65 %, incl = 0.115 + 0.268 ( %C) − 0.038 ( %C)2
Over 0.65 to 0.75 %, incl = 0.143 + 0.2 ( %C)
Over 0.75 to 0.90 %, incl = 0.062 + 0.409 ( %C) − 0.135 ( %C)2
Manganese
17
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 12 Equations For Table 7 Carbon Content, Initial Hardness, 50 % Martensite Hardness
Initial Hardness, H = 35.395 + 6.990x + 312.330x2− 821.744x3+
1015.479x4− 538.346x5
50 % Martensite Hardness, H = 22.974 + 6.214x + 356.364x2− 1091.488x3+
1464.880x4− 750.441x5
where:
H = Hardness in HRC
x = % Carbon
TABLE 13 Equations For Table 8 and Table 9 Jominy Distance for 50 % Martensite versus DI
DI (in.) = 0.14 + 0.443x − 0.01294x2+ 0.000166x3
DI (mm) = 0.35 + 8.262x − 0.231x2+ 0.00405x3− 0.000029x4
where:
x = J Position in 1⁄16 in. or mm
TABLE 14 Equations for Table 10 Boron Factor versus % Carbon and Alloy Factor
7 to 0.81 % C, incl B.F. = 10.29157 − 69.64546 X + 245.7061 X2− 445.3980 X3+ 398.8044 X4− 140.6225 X5
Over 0.81 % C B.F. = 1.00
9 to 0.77 % C, incl B.F. = 10.45573 − 79.18534 X + 311.9332 X2− 630.5490 X3+ 627.6022 X4− 244.4064 X5
Over 0.77 % C B.F. = 1.00
11 to 0.73 % C, incl B.F. = 9.005326 − 64.37669 X + 249.6933 X2− 506.0601 X3+ 509.4772 X4− 201.9323 X5
Over 0.73 % C B.F. = 1.00
13 to 0.67 % C, incl B.F. = 8.054231 − 55.10171 X + 213.6752 X2− 447.8863 X3+ 477.8413 X4− 204.4974 X5
Over 0.67 % C B.F. = 1.00
15 to 0.63 % C, incl B.F. = 9.001263 − 76.47680 X + 355.8714 X2− 872.9646 X3+ 1067.359 X4− 512.7757 X5
Over 0.63 % C B.F. = 1.00
18 to 0.59 % C, incl B.F. = 6.849017 − 46.78647 X + 196.6635 X2− 471.3978 X3+ 587.8504 X4− 295.0410 X5
Over 0.59 % C B.F. = 1.00
22 to 0.55 % C, incl B.F. = 7.217034 − 54.73529 X + 248.9901 X2− 632.7765 X3+ 826.1873 X4− 431.7227 X5
Over 0.55 % C B.F. = 1.00
26 to 0.53 % C, incl B.F. = 7.162633 − 57.52117 X + 279.6173 X2− 756.9353 X3+ 1042.628 X4− 568.5680 X5
Over 0.53 % C B.F. = 1.00
where:
X = % carbon
18
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 15 Equations for Table 2 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Non-Boron Steels, in.
“J” Distance
DIA Dividing Factor
(1⁄16 in.)
2 To 2.1, incl DF = 4.68961 − 11.00832 X + 13.83314 X2− 8.80283 X3+ 2.78698 X4− 0.34880 X5
Over 2.1 DF = 1.00
3 To 3.1, incl DF = 2.34904 − 0.28254 X − 1.42995 X2+ 1.16697 X3− 0.33813 X4+ 0.03403 X5
Over 3.1 DF = 1.00
4 To 4.1, incl DF = 5.66795 − 6.14648 X + 3.52874 X2− 1.06026 X3+ 0.16301 X4− 0.01015 X5
Over 4.1 DF = 1.00
5 To 4.4, incl DF = 4.53651 − 2.92609 X + 1.00411 X2− 0.17129 X3+ 0.01369 X4− 0.00038 X5
Over 4.4 DF = 1.00
6 To 5.0, incl DF = 4.39436 − 2.16072 X + 0.56027 X2− 0.08145 X3+ 0.00840 X4− 0.00053 X5
Over 5.0 DF = 1.00
7 To 5.3, incl DF = 4.20866 − 1.54405 X + 0.08294 X2+ 0.08613 X3− 0.01963 X4+ 0.00127 X5
Over 5.3 DF = 1.00
8 To 5.6, incl DF = 4.44473 − 1.79085 X + 0.24617 X2+ 0.03378 X3− 0.01189 X4+ 0.00084 X5
Over 5.6 DF = 1.00
9 To 5.8, incl DF = 4.95421 − 2.43521 X + 0.62983 X2− 0.07914 X3+ 0.00399 X4− 0.00001 X5
Over 5.8 DF = 1.00
10 To 6.1, incl DF = 5.31610 − 2.80977 X + 0.84183 X2− 0.141781 X3+ 0.01301 X4− 0.00051 X5
Over 6.1 DF = 1.00
12 To 6.6, incl DF = 5.63649 − 2.89264 X + 0.90309 X2− 0.17297 X3+ 0.01881 X4− 0.00086 X5
Over 6.6 DF = 1.00
where:
X = DI in inches.
A
Max DI = 7.0 in.
19
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 16 Equations for Table 3 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Non-Boron Steels, mm
“J” Distance
DIA Dividing Factor
(mm)
3.0 To 52.5, incl DF = 1.65890 − 0.03528 X + 0.00068 X2− 0.000005 X3
Over 52.5 DF = 1.00
where:
X = DI in millimetres.
A
Max DI = 177.5 mm.
20
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 17 Equations for Table 4 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Boron Steels, in.
“J” Distance
DIA Dividing Factor
(1⁄16 in.)
2 To 2.5, incl DF = 22.97570 − 54.60177 X + 54.29984 X2− 26.85746 X3+ 6.59130 X4− 0.64165 X5
Over 2.5 DF = 1.00
3 To 2.9, incl DF = 13.25591 − 28.28828 X + 26.35541 X2− 12.23150 X3+ 2.81374 X4− 0.25263 X5
Over 2.9 DF = 1.00
4 To 3.5, incl DF = 28.50611 − 46.70430 X + 31.90431 X2− 10.91263 X3+ 1.86570 X4− 0.12747 X5
Over 3.5 DF = 1.00
5 To 4.4, incl DF = 24.56368 − 33.70604 X + 19.34623 X2− 5.52132 X3+ 0.78088 X4− 0.04375 X5
Over 4.4 DF = 1.00
6 To 4.9, incl DF = 5.32872 + 1.00334 X − 3.67571 X2+ 1.70752 X3− 0.31024 X4+ 0.02018 X5
Over 4.9 DF = 1.00
7 To 5.2, incl DF = 5.34598 + 0.98810 X − 3.15067 X2+ 1.33727 X3− 0.22285 X4+ 0.01332 X5
Over 5.2 DF = 1.00
8 To 5.6, incl DF = 2.61397 + 4.69073 X − 4.71553 X2+ 1.58031 X3− 0.22844 X4+ 0.01219 X5
Over 5.6 DF = 1.00
9 To 5.8, incl DF = 3.80939 + 2.96448 X − 3.58847 X2+ 1.22906 X3− 0.17730 X4+ 0.00938 X5
Over 5.8 DF = 1.00
10 To 6.1, incl DF = 11.75138 − 8.15904 X + 2.57305 X2− 0.42384 X3+ 0.03679 X4− 0.00136 X5
Over 6.1 DF = 1.00
12 To 6.6, incl DF = 10.94580 − 6.42904 X + 1.72900 X2− 0.24187 X3+ 0.01769 X4− 0.00055 X5
Over 6.6 DF = 1.00
14 To 6.9, incl DF = 14.86832 − 10.16374 X + 3.32700 X2− 0.59480 X3+ 0.05639 X4− 0.00221 X5
Over 6.9 DF = 1.00
where:
X = DIB in inches.
A
Max DI B= 7.0 in.
21
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
TABLE 18 Equations for Table 5 Distance Hardness Dividing Factors for Boron Steels, mm
“J” Distance
DIBA Dividing Factor
(mm)
where:
X = DIB in millimetres.
A
Max DI B= 177.5 mm.
22
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1.1 Scope TABLE X1.1 Orifice Sizes for Testing Small-Size Specimens
quenched end. For readings to 8⁄16 in. from the quenched end,
two hardness traverses are made, both with readings 1⁄16 in.
apart; one starting at 1⁄16 in. and being completed at 8⁄16 in.
from the quenched end, and the other starting at 3⁄32 in. (2.4
mm) and being completed at 15⁄32 in. (11.9 mm) from the
quenched end.
X1.3.3 Only two flats 180° apart need be ground if the
mechanical fixture has a grooved bed that will accommodate
the indentations of the flat surveyed first. The second hardness
traverse is made after turning the bar over. If the fixture does
not have such a grooved bed, two pairs of flats should be
ground, the flats of each pair being 180° apart. The two
hardness surveys are made on adjacent flats.
X1.3.4 For plotting test results, the standard form for
plotting hardenability curves (Fig. 4) should be used. Distances
FIG. X1.1 Support for Smaller-Size Specimens, Showing 0.25-in. for the odd number 1⁄32 in. (0.8 mm) should be measured with
(6.4-mm) Specimen in Position care.
23
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.
A 255 – 02e1
X1.4 Subsize Specimen as Insert in Standard End- X1.2). The small test specimen inserted in the sheath, and the
Quench Test sheath warmed to a temperature above the melting point of the
X1.4.1 A specimen available only in a small size may be Woods metal. After the Woods metal is molten, screw the stud
prepared as an insert in an axially drilled standard size test in place so that the specimen is forced firmly against the
which serves as a sheath (Fig. X1.2). About 0.2 g of Woods bottom of the hole. Then heat the assembly and quench in
metal4 shall be placed in the bottom of the test sheath (Fig. accordance with 6.2 and 6.3. The sheath shall preferably be
made from a plain low-carbon steel. After the quench, warm
the assembly in boiling water to melt the Woods metal and
4
The composition of Woods metal is 50 % bismuth, 25 % lead, and 25 % tin, and remove the specimen. Then make Rockwell hardness measure-
the melting point is 200°F (93°C). ments on the C scale on the specimen as prescribed in 6.3.
REFERENCES
(1) Grossman, M. A., Hardenability Calculated from Chemical Compo- (6) Hewitt, W., Hardenability—Its Prediction from Chemical Composi-
sition, AIME Transactions, Vol 150, 1942, pp. 227–259. tion, Heat Treatment of Metals, Vol 8, 1981, pp. 33–38.
(2) Banerji, S. K., and Morral, J. E., Boron in Steel , AIME, Warrentown, (7) Tartaglia, J. M., and Eldis, G. T., Core Hardenability Calculations
Pa, 1980, pp. 106–126. for Carburizing Steels, Vol 15A, No. 6, Metallurgical Transactions,
(3) Siebert, C. A., Doane, D. V., and Breen, D. H., The Hardenability of June 1984, pp. 1173–1183.
Steels, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1977, p. 64 ff. (8) Jatczak, C. F., Determining Hardenability from Composition. Metal
(4) Just, E., New Formulas for Calculating Hardenability Curves, Progress, Vol 100, No. 3, September 1971, p. 60.
Metals Progress, November 1969, pp. 87–88. (9) Kramer, I. R., Siegel, S., and Brooks, J., Factors for the Calculation
(5) Doane, D. V., and Kirkaldy, J. S., eds., Hardenability Concepts with of Hardenability. AIME Transactions, Vol 163, 1946, p. 670.
Applications to Steel, The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, (10) Crafts, W., and Lamont, Y., The Effects of Some Hardenability,
PA, 1978. AIME Transactions, Vol 158, 1944, p. 162.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee A01 has identified the location of selected changes to these test methods since the last issue,
A 255 - 99, that may impact the use of these test methods.
(1) New section 10.2 added. (2) Previous section 10.2 renumbered as 10.3.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
24
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Mon Jul 23 12:32:21 EDT 2007
Downloaded/printed by
VICENTE B ESCUDERO (EUROBRIDAS FITTINGS) pursuant to License Agreement. No further reproductions authorized.