GHG Balancing
GHG Balancing
GHG Balancing
State of California
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), local agencies have a very important role to play in
California’s fight against global warming – one of the most serious environmental effects facing the State today.
Where local agencies undertake projects directly, they can and should design sustainable projects from the start,
incorporating global warming related considerations into their projects at the earliest feasible time. Further,
local agencies can encourage well-designed, sustainable private projects by analyzing and disclosing to the
public the environmental benefits of such projects in any required environmental documents. And where
projects as proposed will have significant global warming related effects, local agencies can require feasible
changes or alternatives, and impose enforceable, verifiable, feasible mitigation measures to substantially lessen
those effects. By the sum of their decisions, local agencies will help to move the State away from “business as
usual” and toward a low-carbon future.
This document provides information that may be helpful to local agencies in carrying out their duties under
CEQA as they relate to global warming. Included in this document are various measures that may reduce the
global warming related impacts of a project. As appropriate, the measures can be included as design features of
a project, required as changes to the project, or imposed as mitigation (whether undertaken directly by the
project proponent or funded by mitigation fees). The measures set forth in this package are examples; the list is
not intended to be exhaustive. Moreover, the measures cited may not be appropriate for every project. The
decision of whether to approve a project – as proposed or with required changes or mitigation – is for the local
agency, exercising its informed judgment in compliance with the law and balancing a variety of public
objectives.
The first section of this document lists examples of measures that could be applied to a diverse range of projects
where the lead agency determines that the project under consideration will have significant global warming
related effects. In general, a given measure should not be considered in isolation, but as part of a larger set of
measures that, working together, will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the effects of global warming.
The second section of this document lists examples of potential greenhouse gas reduction measures in the
general plan context. This section is included both to suggest how the measures set forth in the first section
could be incorporated into a general plan, as well as to identify measures that are general plan specific. The
measures in the second section may also be appropriate for inclusion in larger scale plans, including regional
plans (e.g., blueprint plans) and in specific plans. Including these types of measures at the larger planning
level, as appropriate, will help to ensure more sustainable project-specific development.
The third section provides links to sources of information on global warming impacts and emission reduction
measures. The list is not complete, but may be a helpful start for local agencies seeking more information to
carry out their CEQA obligations as they relate to global warming.
The endnotes set forth just some of the many examples of exemplary emission reduction measures already
being implemented by local governments and agencies, utilities, private industry, and others. As these
examples evidence, California at every level of government is taking up the challenge, devising new and
innovative solutions, and leading the charge in the fight against global warming.
(1) Generally Applicable Measures
Energy Efficiency1
• Design buildings to be energy efficient. Site buildings to take advantage of shade, prevailing
winds, landscaping and sun screens to reduce energy use.2
• Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an integral part of lighting
systems in buildings.
• Install light colored “cool” roofs, cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees.3
• Provide information on energy management services for large energy users.4
• Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and control
systems.5
• Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other outdoor lighting.6
• Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting.
• Use solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors for pools and spas.7
• Provide education on energy efficiency.8
Renewable Energy
• Install solar and wind power systems, solar and tankless hot water heaters, and energy-
efficient heating ventilation and air conditioning. Educate consumers about existing
incentives.9
• Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas.10
• Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications.11
Water Conservation and Efficiency12
• Create water-efficient landscapes.13
• Install water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture-based irrigation
controls.
• Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new developments and on public property.
Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water.
• Design buildings to be water-efficient. Install water-efficient fixtures and appliances.
• Use graywater. (Graywater is untreated household waste water from bathtubs, showers,
bathroom wash basins, and water from clothes washing machines.) For example, install dual
plumbing in all new development allowing graywater to be used for landscape irrigation.14
• Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non-vegetated surfaces) and
control runoff.
• Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles.
• Implement low-impact development practices that maintain the existing hydrologic character of
the site to manage storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining storm water runoff on-
1. Energy efficiency leads the mitigation list because it promises significant greenhouse gas reductions
through measures that are cost-effective for the individual residential and commercial energy consumer.
2. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) administers a Green Building Ratings
program that provides benchmarks for the design, construction, and operation of high-performance
green buildings. More information about the LEED ratings system is available at
http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19. Build it Green is a non-profit, membership
organization that promotes green building practices in California. The organization offers a point-based,
green building rating system for various types of projects. See
http://www.builditgreen.org/guidelines-rating-systems. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories’
Building Technologies Department is working to develop coherent and innovative building construction
and design techniques. Information and publications on energy efficient buildings are available at the
Department’s website at http://btech.lbl.gov. The California Department of Housing and Community
Development has created an extensive Green Building & Sustainability Resources handbook with links
to green building resources, available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/green_build.pdf.
3. For more information, see Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Heat Island Group at
http://eetd.lbl.gov/HeatIsland/.
4. See California Energy Commission, “How to Hire an Energy Services Company” (2000) at
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001D.PDF.
5. Energy Star is a joint program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of
Energy that certifies energy efficient products and provides guidelines for energy efficient practices for
homes and businesses. More information about Energy Star-certified products is available at
http://www.energystar.gov/. The Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) is a
system that ranks computer products based on their conformance to a set of environmental criteria,
including energy efficiency. More information about EPEAT is available at
http://www.epeat.net/AboutEPEAT.aspx.
6. LED lighting is substantially more energy efficient than conventional lighting and can save money. See
http://www.energy.ca.gov/efficiency/partnership/case_studies/TechAsstCity.pdf (noting that installing
LED traffic signals saved the City of Westlake about $34,000 per year). As of 2005, only about a
quarter of California’s cities and counties were using 100% LEDs in traffic signals. See California
Energy Commission (CEC), Light Emitting Diode Traffic Signal Survey (2005) at p. 15, available at
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-400-2005-003/CEC-400-2005-003.PDF. The CEC’s
Energy Partnership Program can help local governments take advantage of energy saving technology,
including, but not limited to, LED traffic signals. See http://www.energy.ca.gov/efficiency/partnership/.
10. For example, Alameda County has installed two solar tracking carports, each generating 250 kilowatts.
By 2005, the County had installed eight photovoltaic systems totaling over 2.3 megawatts. The County
is able to meet 6 percent of its electricity needs through solar power. See
http://www.acgov.org/gsa/Alameda%20County%20-%20Solar%20Case%20Study.pdf.
11. Many commercial, industrial, and campus-type facilities (such as hospitals, universities and prisons) use
fuel to produce steam and heat for their own operations and processes. Unless captured, much of this
heat is wasted. Combined heat and power (CHP) captures waste heat and re-uses it, e.g., for residential
or commercial space heating or to generate electricity. See U.S. EPA, Catalog of CHP Technologies at
http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/catalog_of_%20chp_tech_entire.pdf. The average efficiency of
fossil-fueled power plants in the United States is 33 percent. By using waste heat recovery technology,
CHP systems typically achieve total system efficiencies of 60 to 80 percent. CHP can also substantially
reduce emissions of carbon dioxide. http://www.epa.gov/chp/basic/efficiency.html. Currently, CHP in
California has a capacity of over 9 million kilowatts. See list of California CHP facilities at
http://www.eea-inc.com/chpdata/States/CA.html.
12. The California Energy Commission has found that the State’s water-related energy use – which includes
the conveyance, storage, treatment, distribution, wastewater collection, treatment, and discharge –
consumes about 19 percent of the State’s electricity, 30 percent of its natural gas, and 88 billion gallons
of diesel fuel every year. See
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-999-2007-008/CEC-999-2007-008.PDF.
Accordingly, reducing water use and improving water efficiency can help reduce energy use and
associated greenhouse gas emissions.
13. The Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881) requires the Department of Water
Resources (DWR), not later than January 1, 2009, to update the Model Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance. The draft of the entire updated Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance will be made
available to the public. See http://www.owue.water.ca.gov/landscape/ord/updatedOrd.cfm.
14. See Graywater Guide, Department of Water Resources, Office of Water Use Efficiency and Transfers at
http://www.owue.water.ca.gov/docs/graywater_guide_book.pdf. See also The Ahwahnee Water
Principles, Principle 6, at http://www.lgc.org/ahwahnee/h2o_principles.html. The Ahwahnee Water
Principles have been adopted by City of Willits, Town of Windsor, Menlo Park, Morgan Hill, Palo Alto,
Petaluma, Port Hueneme, Richmond, Rohnert Park, Rolling Hills Estates, San Luis Obispo, Santa Paula,
Santa Rosa, City of Sunnyvale, City of Ukiah, Ventura, Marin County, Marin Municipal Water District,
and Ventura County.
16. See, for example, the City of Santa Cruz, Water Conservation Office at
http://www.ci.santa-cruz.ca.us/wt/wtcon/index.html; Santa Clara Valley Water District, Water
Conservation at http://www.valleywater.org/conservation/index.shtm; and Metropolitan Water District
and the Family of Southern California Water Agencies, Be Water Wise at http://www.bewaterwise.com.
Private projects may provide or fund similar education.
17. See Public Interest Energy Research Program, Dairy Power Production Program, Dairy Methane
Digester System, 90-Day Evaluation Report, Eden Vale Dairy (Dec. 2006) at
http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-500-2006-083/CEC-500-2006-083.PDF. See also
discussion in the general plan section, below, relating to wastewater treatment plants and landfills.
18. Many cities and counties provide information on waste reduction and recycling. See, for example, the
Butte County Guide to Recycling at http://www.recyclebutte.net. The California Integrated Waste
Management Board’s website contains numerous publications on recycling and waste reduction that
may be helpful in devising an education project. See
http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Publications/default.asp?cat=13. Private projects may also provide education
directly, or fund education.
19. See U.S. EPA, Our Built and Natural Environments, A Technical Review of the Interactions between
Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Quality (Jan. 2001) at pp. 46-48
http://www.epa.gov/dced/pdf/built.pdf.
20. See California Department of Housing and Community Development, Myths and Facts About
Affordable and High Density Housing (2002), available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/mythsnfacts.pdf.
21. Palo Alto’s Green Ribbon Task Force Report on Climate Protection recommends pedestrian and
bicycle-only streets under its proposed actions. See
http://www.city.palo-alto.ca.us/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=7478.
22. There are a number of car sharing programs operating in California, including City CarShare
http://www.citycarshare.org/, Zip Car http://www.zipcar.com/ and Flexcar http://www.flexcar.com/.
24. Promoting “least polluting” methods of moving people and goods is part of a larger, integrated
“sustainable streets” strategy now being explored at U.C. Davis’s Sustainable Transportation Center.
Resources and links are available at the Center’s website. See http://stc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/ssp.php.
25. See, for example, Marin County’s Safe Routes to Schools program at
http://www.saferoutestoschools.org/.
26. For information on the general plan process, see Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General
Plan Guidelines (1998), available at http://ceres.ca.gov/planning/genplan/gpg.pdf.
28. See the Attorney General’s settlement agreement with the County of San Bernardino, available at
http://ag.ca.gov/cms_pdfs/press/2007-08-21_San_Bernardino_settlement_agreement.pdf. See also
Marin County Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (Oct. 2006) at
http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/pdf/final_ghg_red_plan.pdf; Marin Countywide Plan (Nov. 6,
2007) at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/fm/cwpdocs/CWP_CD2.pdf; Draft Conservation
Element, General Plan, City of San Diego at
http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/genplan/pdf/generalplan/ce070918.pdf.
29. Public Resources Code Section 25402.1(h)2 and Section 10-106 of the Building Energy Efficiency
Standards establish a process that allows local adoption of energy standards that are more stringent than
the statewide Standards. More information is available at the California Energy Commission’s website.
See
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2005standards/ordinances_exceeding_2005_building_standards.html.
31. The City of Santa Monica, for example, has instituted a Green Building Program. See
http://www.greenbuildings.santa-monica.org/. The City of Pasadena also has a green building ordinance
that applies to public and private buildings. See
http://www.ci.pasadena.ca.us/permitcenter/greencity/building/gbprogram.asp and
http://ordlink.com/codes/pasadena/index.htm?Search_Code=Begin+Searching+Municipal+Code at Title
14. The City of San Francisco is considering adopting green building performance requirements that
would apply to public and private buildings. See
http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/gbtfrrreleasev1.3.pdf.
32. See, e.g., “Green County San Bernardino,” http://www.greencountysb.com/. As part of its program, the
County is waiving permit fees for alternative energy systems and efficient heating and air conditioning
systems. See http://www.greencountysb.com/ at p. 3. For a representative list of incentives for green
building offered in California and throughout the nation, see U.S. Green Building Council, Summary of
Government LEED Incentives (updated quarterly) at
https://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2021.
33. For example, Riverside Public Utilities offers free comprehensive energy audits to its business
customers. See http://www.riversideca.gov/utilities/busi-technicalassistance.asp.
34. Under Southern California Gas Company’s Energy Efficiency Program for Commercial/Industrial Large
Business Customers, participants are eligible to receive an incentive based on 50% of the equipment
cost, or $0.50 per therm saved, whichever is lower, up to a maximum amount of $1,000,000 per
customer, per year. Eligible projects require an energy savings of at least 200,000 therms per year. See
http://www.socalgas.com/business/efficiency/grants/.
The California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research Program estimates that the
technical potential for rooftop applications of photovoltaic systems in the State is about 40 gigawatts in
2006, rising to 68 gigawatts in 2016. See Public Interest Energy Research Program, California Rooftop
Photovoltaic (PV) Resource Assessment and Growth Potential by County (2007), available at
http://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/displayOneReport.php?pubNum=CEC-500-2007-048.
36. As described in its Climate Action Plan, the City of San Francisco uses a combination of incentives and
technical assistance to reduce lighting energy use in small businesses such as grocery stores, small retail
outlets, and restaurants. The program offers free energy audits and coordinated lighting retrofit
installation. In addition, the City offers residents the opportunity to turn in their incandescent lamps for
coupons to buy fluorescent units. See San Francisco’s Climate Action Plan, available at
http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/climateactionplan.pdf.
37. Among other strategies for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions, Yolo County has adopted purchasing
policies for computers and electrical equipment.
http://www.yolocounty.org/docs/press/GreenhouseGas.htm.
38. See, for example, Los Angeles County Green Purchasing Policy, June 2007 at
http://www.responsiblepurchasing.org/UserFiles/File/General/Los%20Angeles%20County,%20Green%
20Purchasing%20Policy,%20June%202007.pdf. The policy requires County agencies to purchase
products that minimize environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions.
39. Some local agencies have implemented a cool surfaces programs in conjunction with measures to
address storm water runoff and water quality. See, for example, The City of Irvine’s Sustainable
Travelways/Green Streets program at
http://www.cityofirvine.org/depts/redevelopment/sustainable_travelways.asp; The City of Los Angeles’s
Green Streets LA program at
http://water.lgc.org/water-workshops/la-workshop/Green_Streets_Daniels.pdf/view; see also The
Chicago Green Alley Handbook at
http://egov.cityofchicago.org/webportal/COCWebPortal/COC_EDITORIAL/GreenAlleyHandbook_Jan.
pdf.
40. See the website for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Urban Heat Island Group at
http://eetd.lbl.gov/HeatIsland/LEARN/ and U.S. EPA’s Heat Island website at
www.epa.gov/heatisland/. To learn about the effectiveness of various heat island mitigation strategies,
see the Mitigation Impact Screening Tool, available at http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/resources/tools.html.
42. The Irvine Ranch Water District in Southern California, for example, uses a five-tiered rate structure
that rewards conservation. The water district has a baseline charge for necessary water use. Water use
that exceeds the baseline amount costs incrementally more money. While “low volume” water use costs
$.082 per hundred cubic feet (ccf), “wasteful” water use costs $7.84 per ccf. See
http://www.irwd.com/AboutIRWD/rates_residential.php. Marin County has included tiered billing rates
as part of its general plan program to conserve water. See Marin County Countywide Plan, page 3-204,
PFS-2.q, available at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/fm/cwpdocs/CWP_CD2.pdf.
44. See, e.g., the City of San Diego’s plumbing retrofit ordinance at
http://www.sandiego.gov/water/conservation/selling.shtml.
45. The City of Roseville offers free water conservation audits through house calls and on-line surveys. See
http://www.roseville.ca.us/eu/water_utility/water_conservation/for_home/programs_n_rebates.asp.
46. See Landscape Performance Certification Program, Municipal Water District of Orange County at
http://waterprograms.com/wb/30_Landscapers/LC_01.htm.
47. For example, San Diego’s Metropolitan Wastewater Department (SDMWD) installed eight digesters at
one of its wastewater treatment plants. Digesters use heat and bacteria to break down the organic solids
removed from the wastewater to create methane, which can be captured and used for energy. The
methane generated by SDMWD’s digesters runs two engines that supply enough energy for all of the
plant’s needs, and the plant sells the extra energy to the local grid. See
http://www.sandiego.gov/mwwd/facilities/ptloma.shtml. In addition, the California Air Resources
Board approved the Landfill Methane Capture Strategy as an early action measure.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccea/landfills/landfills.htm. Numerous landfills in California, such as the
Puenta Hills Landfill in Los Angeles County
(http://www.lacsd.org/about/solid_waste_facilities/puente_hills/clean_fuels_program.asp), the Scholl
Canyon Landfill in the City of Glendale
(http://www.glendalewaterandpower.com/Renewable%20Energy%20Development.asp), and theYolo
Landfill in Yolo County, are using captured methane to generate power and reduce the need for other
more carbon-intensive energy sources.
48. On April 30, 2007, the Public Utilities Commission authorized a CCA application by the Kings River
Conservation District on behalf of San Joaquin Valley Power Authority (SJVPA). SJVPA's
Implementation Plan and general CCA program information are available at
www.communitychoice.info. See also
http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/comdev/advance/Sustainability/Energy/cca/CCA.cfm.
(County of Marin); and http://sfwater.org/mto_main.cfm/MC_ID/12/MSC_ID/138/MTO_ID/237 (San
Francisco Public Utilities Commission). See also Public Interest Energy Research, Community Choice
49. The Land Use Element designates the type, intensity, and general distribution of uses of land for
housing, business, industry, open-space, education, public buildings and grounds, waste disposal
facilities, and other categories of public and private uses.
50. Samples of local legislation to reduce sprawl are set forth in the U.S. Conference of Mayors’ Climate
Action Handbook. See
http://www.iclei.org/documents/USA/documents/CCP/Climate_Action_Handbook-0906.pdf.
51. For a list and maps related to urban growth boundaries in California, see Urban Growth Boundaries and
Urban Line Limits, Association of Bay Area Governments (2006) at
http://www.abag.ca.gov/jointpolicy/Urban%20Growth%20Boundaries%20and%20Urban%20Limit%20
Lines.pdf.
52. The Circulation Element works with the Land Use element and identifies the general location and extent
of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public
utilities and facilities.
54. San Francisco’s “Transit First” Policy is listed in its Climate Action Plan, available at
http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/climateactionplan.pdf. The City’s policy gives
priority to public transit investments and provides public transit street capacity and discourages
increases in automobile traffic. This policy has resulted in increased transit service to meet the needs
generated by new development.
55. The City of La Mesa has a Sidewalk Master Plan and an associated map that the City uses to prioritize
funding. As the City states, “The most important concept for sidewalks is connectivity. For people to
want to use a sidewalk, it must conveniently connect them to their intended destination.” See
http://www.ci.la-mesa.ca.us/index.asp?NID=699.
56. San Francisco assesses a Downtown Transportation Impact Fee on new office construction and
commercial office space renovation within a designated district. The fee is discussed in the City’s
Climate Action plan, available at
http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/climateactionplan.pdf.
57. For example, Seattle, Washington maintains a public transportation “ride free” zone in its downtown
from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily. See
http://transit.metrokc.gov/tops/accessible/paccessible_map.html#fare.
58. See, e.g., Reforming Parking Policies to Support Smart Growth, Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (June 2007) at
implementation.pdf.
59. See Safe Routes to School Toolkit, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2002) at
www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/pedbimot/bike/Safe-Routes-2002; see also
www.saferoutestoschools.org (Marin County).
60. The Housing Element assesses current and projected housing needs. In addition, it sets policies for
providing adequate housing and includes action programs for that purpose.
61. The U.S. Conference of Mayors cites Sacramento’s Transit Village Redevelopment as a model of
transit-oriented development. More information about this project is available at
http://www.cityofsacramento.org/planning/projects/65th-street-village/. The Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) has developed policies and funding programs to foster transit-
oriented development. More information is available at MTC’s website:
http://www.mtc.ca.gov/planning/smart_growth/#tod. The California Department of Transportation
maintains a searchable database of 21 transit-oriented developments at
http://transitorienteddevelopment.dot.ca.gov/miscellaneous/NewHome.jsp.
62. The City of Berkeley has endorsed the strategy of reducing developer fees or granting property tax
credits for mixed-use developments in its Resource Conservation and Global Warming Abatement Plan.
City of Berkeley’s Resource Conservation and Global Warming Abatement Plan p. 25 at
http://www.baaqmd.gov/pln/GlobalWarming/BerkeleyClimateActionPlan.pdf.
63. The Open Space Element details plans and measures for preserving open space for natural resources, the
managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, public health and safety, and the identification of
agricultural land. As discussed previously in these Endnotes, there may be substantial overlap in the
measures appropriate for the Conservation and Open Space Elements.
64. The Safety Element establishes policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated
with seismic, geologic, flood, and wildfire hazards.