Basic Principles of Analytical Method Validation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 34

Principles of Analytical

Method Validation
Ian Ace A. Pacquiao, RPh,
MSPharm
Introduction
⦿ Quality should be built into the product
and testing alone cannot be relied on to
ensure product quality
⦿ The validation process of an analytical
procedure demonstrates that a
procedure is suitable for its intended
purpose.
⦿ The validation process is an essential but
time-consuming activity for most
analytical development laboratories.
Objectives
⦿ At the end of the activity, the students are
expected to:
• Discuss the basic principles of analytical method
validation
• Discuss the process of analytical method
validation
• Identify the information needed in an analytical
procedure
• Discuss the different analytical method
validation characteristics
Basic Principles of Analytical
Method Validation
⦿ There are many reasons for the validation
of analytical procedures, which includes:
• Regulatory requirements
• Good Science
• Quality Control Requirements
Cycle of Analytical Methods
Process of Analytical Method
Validation
⦿ Typical process that is followed in an
analytical method validation is
chronologically listed
• Planning and deciding on the method validation
experiments
• Writing and approval of method validation
protocol
• Analysis of the method validation data
• Reporting the analytical method validation
• Finalizing the analytical method procedure
Process of Analytical Method
Validation
⦿ A normal validation protocol should
contain the following contents at a
minimum
• Objective of the protocol
• Validation parameters that will be evaluated
• Acceptance criteria for all validation parameters
evaluated
• Details of the experiments to be performed
• Draft analytical procedure
Process of Analytical Method
Validation – Validation Parameters
Type of Analytical Testing for Impurities Assay –
Procedure Content/
Characteristics Identificati Quantitatio Limit Potency
on n
Accuracy - + - +
Precision -
Repeatability - + - +
Intermediate Precision + - +
Specificity + + + +
Detection Limit - - + -
Quantitation Limit - + - -
Linearity - + - +
Range - + - +
Information Required in an
Analytical Procedure
⦿ Minimal information that should be
included in the final analytical procedure
are as follows:
• Rationale of the analytical procedure and
description of the capability of the method
• Proposed analytical procedure
• List of permitted impurities and its levels in an
impurity assay
• Validation data
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Typical Validation Characteristics include:
• Accuracy
• Specificity
• Precision
• Linearity
• Range
• Robustness
• Detection limit
• Quantitation limit
• Sample and standard stability
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Accuracy
• International Convention on Harmonization
(ICH) defines accuracy as:
● Closeness of agreement between the values that are
accepted either as conventional true values or an
accepted reference value and the value found (in the
analytical procedure*)
• Also defined as trueness
● Closeness of agreement between value found using
the method and either an accepted reference value or
established true value
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Accuracy
• Evaluation method example: Spike and Recovery
Experiments
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Accuracy
• ICH recommends assessing a minimum of nine
determinations over a minimum of three
concentration levels covering the specified
range
• This is usually reported as percent recovery by
the assay of known added amount of analyte in
the sample
• Typical accuracy of the recovery of the drug
substance is expected to be at about 99-101%
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Method Precision
• The precision of an analytical procedure
expresses the closeness of agreement between a
series of measurements obtained from multiple
samples of the same homogenous sample under
prescribed conditions
• This is usually investigated at three levels mainly
● Repeatability
● Intermediate precision
● Reproducibility
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Repeatability (intra-assay precision)
• Measure of precision under:
● Same operating conditions
● Short interval of time
● Normal operating conditions
● Same equipment
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Assessment of Repeatability according to
ICH
• Use of a minimum of nine determinations over a
minimum of three concentration levels
• Use a minimum of six determinations at 100% of
the test concentration
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics – Repeatability Data
Replicate Percentage Label Claim
1 100.6
2 102.1
3 100.5
4 99.4
5 101.4
6 101.1
Mean 100.9
Percentage Relative Standard 0.90
Deviation
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Intermediate Precision
• This is defined as the variation within the same
laboratory
• Parameters investigated include:
● Day to day variation
● Analyst variation
● Equipment variation
• Experimental design is encouraged
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Intermediate Precision
• ICH recommends the reporting of standard
deviation, relative standard deviation and
confidence interval of the data
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Reproducibility
• Measures the precision between laboratories
• This parameter is considered in the
standardization of an analytical procedure
• Validation of this analytical procedure the
following should be done
● Similar studies performed at different laboratories
using the same sample and same experimental
designs
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Reproducibility
• Is measured during method transfers between
laboratories
● Originating laboratory
● Receiving laboratory
• Direct method transfer
● Protocol be initiated with:
● Details of the experiment to be performed
● Acceptance criteria
Characteristics – Method
Transfer Data
Runs Average Percent
Originating Laboratory 12 100.7
Receiving Laboratory 4 100.2
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Specificity
• ICH defines this as the ability to assess
unequivocally an analyte in the presence of
components that may be expected to be present
• Identity Tests should recognize compounds of
closely related structures which are likely to be
present should be discriminated from each other
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Specificity
• Identity tests
● Can be confirmed by obtaining positive results from
samples containing the analyte coupled with negative
results from samples that do not contain the analyte
● May also be applied material structurally similar or
closely related to the analyte to confirm a positive
response is not obtained
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Detection Limits
• This is a characteristic for the limit test only
• This is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample
that can be detected but not necessarily
quantitated under specified experimental
conditions
• Usually expressed in concentration of the
analyte in the sample
● Percentage, parts per million (ppm), parts per billion
(ppb)
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Detection Limits
• Approaches to determine detection limits
● Visual examination
● Instrumental methods
● Analysis of a series of samples with known concentrations
and establishing minimum level at which analyte can be
reliably detected
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Quantitation Limits
• Characteristic of quantitatve assays for low
levels of compounds in sample matrices such as
● Impurities in bulk drug substance
● Degradation products in finished pharmaceuticals
• The QL of a method is affected by both the
detector sensitivity and the accuracy of sample
preparation at the low concentration of
impurities
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Quantitation Limit
• ICH recommends three approaches to the estimation
of QL
● Visual evaluation
● Determination of signal to noise ratio (instrumental
method)
● Estimation of QL using an equation
• Whatever approach is applied, the QL should be
subsequently validated by the analysis of a suitable
number of samples prepared at the QL and
determining the precision and accuracy at this level
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Linearity
• This is the ability of an analytical procedure to
obtain test results of variable data which are
directly proportional to the concentration in the
sample
• Approaches for determination of linearity
● Weigh different amounts of standard to prepare
linearity solutions at different concentrations
● Prepare a stock solution of high concentration and
dilution of the stock solution
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Range
• This is the interval between the upper and the
lower concentration of analyte in the sample for
which it has been demonstrated that the analyte
has a suitable level of precision, accuracy and
linearity
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Range
• For assay of drug substances or finished
products, it is normally recommended to have a
range of 80-120% of nominal concentration
• For content uniformity, a normal range would
cover 70-130% of the nominal concentration
unless a wider and more appropriate range is
justified
• For dissolution testing, a normal range is +20%
over the specified range
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Robustness
• This is a measure of the analytical method to
remain unaffected by small but deliberate
variations in method parameters and provides
an indication of its reliability during normal
usage
• This is normally considered during the
development phase of the drug and depends
upon the procedure under study
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Robustness
• Common method parameters that can affect the
analytical procedure should be considered
based on the analytical technique and the
properties of the samples. Specifically:
● Sample preparation
● Extraction time
● Sample solvent
● Membrane filters
● Sample and standard stability
Analytical Method Validation
Characteristics
⦿ Robustness
• When results are affected by critical
experimental parameters, precautionary
statements should be included in the analytical
procedure should be explicitly written.

You might also like