Name: Syed Haris Shah Class Number: 146 Semester: 6th Paper: Islamic Jurisprudence Submitted To: Kiran Nisar
Name: Syed Haris Shah Class Number: 146 Semester: 6th Paper: Islamic Jurisprudence Submitted To: Kiran Nisar
Name: Syed Haris Shah Class Number: 146 Semester: 6th Paper: Islamic Jurisprudence Submitted To: Kiran Nisar
Answer No 1:
Islamic Law of Inheritance:
Introduction:
When Muslim dies leaving some property behind, the question arises as to how
his property is to be disposed of. The rule regarding inheritance become very
important because Islamic law restricts the power of distribution of property
through will. Islam has devised many systems so to avoid the concentration of
wealth and inheritance is one of them. Islam very precisely has given a set of rules
regarding inheritance on which emphasis is given by the Prophet Muhammad
(PBUH) on learning these rules. Due to existence of different school of law various
variation were introduced into the traditional practice, when viewed on world-
wide basis this is an extremely complex and variegated phenomenon.
The law of inheritance is available in many verses of Holy Quran, including: Surah
Al-Nisa; Surah Al-Maida; Surah AL-Anfal; and Surah Al-Baqara. Following few of
them;
“Allah commands you regarding (the provision for) your children: to the male the
equivalent of the portion of two females, and if there be women more than two,
then theirs is two-thirds of the inheritance, and if there be one (only) then the
half. And to each of his parents a sixth of the inheritance, if he have a son; and if
he have no son and his parents are his heirs, then to his mother appertained the
third; and if he have brethren, then to his mother appertained the sixth, after any
legacy he may have bequeathed, or debt (hath been paid). Your parents and your
children: Ye know not which of them is nearer unto you in usefulness. It is an
injunction from Allah. Lo! Allah is Knower, Wise”
“And for you is half of what your wives leave if they have no child. But if they have
a child, for you is one fourth of what they leave, after any bequest they [may
have] made or debt. And for the wives is one fourth if you leave no child. But if
you leave a child, then for them is an eighth of what you leave, after any bequest
you [may have] made or debt. And if a man or woman leaves neither ascendants
nor descendants but has a brother or a sister, then for each one of them is a sixth.
But if they are more than two, they share a third, after any bequest which was
made or debt, as long as there is no detriment [caused]. [This is] an ordinance
from Allah, and Allah is Knowing and Forbearing” (COPIED)
“A Muslim cannot be the heir of a disbeliever, nor can a disbeliever be the heir of
a Muslim”
“Give the shares of inheritance that are prescribed in the Quran to those who are
entitled to receive it. Then whatever remains, should be given to the closest male
relative of the deceased”.
Elements of inheritance:
Deceased (moa’ris)
Legal heir (waris)
Property left by deceased (tark’a)
These three elements must co-exist for the application of inheritance. At the time
of the death of deceased, the respective shares of heirs automatically devolve
into them, however the actual distribution take place later.
After death of a Muslim, the first priority was the deduction of following financial
obligations from the leftover estate of deceased;
1. Funeral expenses;
2. Debts;
3. Payment of all dues if any such as hospital bills and alike incurred during
last days of deceased life;
4. Execution of bequest (will).
Once all above financial obligations are fulfilled then question arises who are the
legal heirs of deceased and up to what extent they will inherit. For that purpose
we have to know about classes of heirs.
Classifications of Heirs:
Shia Classification
Sunni Classification
1; Shia Classification:
Heirs by consanguinity
Heirs by marriage.
Heirs by consanguinity;
In above classes one principal is use i.e. nearer in degree excludes the farer which
means that the first class as a whole excludes the rest of the two and so on.
Heirs by marriage:
2; Sunni Classification:
1. Sharers
2. Residuaries
3. Distant Kindred
Sharers:
The Holy Quran mention nine persons as sharers, Sunni added three more by
analogy which make them twelve in number; Shias only recognize nine sharers
that are mentioned in Holy Quran. Out of these twelve, four are termed as
“primary heirs” as they are never excluded from inheritance. They include;
Out of these twelve, four are male and eight are female i.e.
Father;
Grandfather;
Brother;
Husband;
Mother;
Grandmother (Both);
Wife;
Daughter;
Granddaughter;
Sister (full) i.e. from same mother and father;
Paternal Sister;
Maternal Sister;
Maternal grandmother
Paternal grandfather
Agnatic granddaughter
These are collectively known as “Quranic Heirs”. They get fix share and the rest of
estate is distributed among the residuaries.
Residuaries:
Those who take no share prescribed, but succeed to the residue left once the
claims of shares are classified, are termed as “residuaries”, they include;
Descendants;
Ascendants;
Descendants of father i.e. full brother/s and sister/s, consanguine brother/s
and sister/s;
Descendants of true grandfather i.e. paternal uncle/s and aunt/s etc.
Distant Kindred:
They are all those relations by blood who are neither sharers nor residuaries and
are only entitled to inherit when there are no sharers and residuaries to get the
estate. They are group of potential heirs relating to the class of cognate relatives.
After going through above process following rules are devised. The heirs are
classified into first category heirs and second category heirs;
1. Share OF husband:
If no entitled descendants exist (i.e.; Children/Grandchildren), then
Husband = 1/2
If entitled descendants exist (i.e.; Children/Grandchildren), then
Husband = 1/4
Note: entitled descendants = Sons, Daughters, Son’s Son, & Son’s Daughter.
Daughter’s children are NOT treated as entitled descendants.
2. Share of wife:
Wife = 1/4
If entitled descendants exist (i.e.; Children/Grandchildren), then
WIFE = 1/8
Note: entitled descendants = sons, daughters, son’s son, & son’s daughter.
Daughter’s children are not treated as entitled descendants.
3. SHARE OF DAUGHTER’(s):
If only one daughter (and no sons), then
Daughter = 1/2
If two or more daughters only (and NO Sons), then
Daughters = 2/3
(To be shared equally between all of them)
4. Share of father:
If entitled descendants exist (Sons, Daughters, Son’s Sons, Son’s Daughters), then
Father = 1/6
If no male descendants exist (sons, son’s sons), then
Father = residue
5. Share of mother:
Mother = 1/6
If no entitled descendants exist, then
Mother = 1/3
If brothers/sisters, father, or spouse exist, then
If no daughters exist
Brothers & sisters inherit only when there are no descendants (son/sons, son’s
son
Etc.) And no ascendants (father/grandfather etc.)
The Arabic word “al-khalala” is used in the quran, chapter 4 – al-Nisa, verses 12 &
176, which is translated by almost all the translators of the quran to mean
“ascendants & descendants” thus giving rise to the interpretation that they
include “parents and children”. However, many scholars have preferred to classify
the word as meaning “father or son” thus excluding the female
components of both ascendants and descendants (mother & daughters).
If no full brother and no female entitled descendant exist
9. Consanguine sister (sister from same father but different mother):
Consanguine sisters inherit only when there are no son’s or son’s son(s) and no
father and no full brother.
If only one full sister and no consanguine brother, then
True grandmother is defined as the one whose line of connection with the
deceased is not interrupted by a male between two females. They are entitled
only if the father or mother do not exist.
Eg;
mother’s mother;
father’s mother
Father’s father’s mother;
Mother’s mother’s mother.
Uncles and aunts are only entitled in the absence of grandparents. This means
that they will receive shares only if there are no parents and grandparents
because grandparents do not inherit when the parents are living. They will also
not inherit if the children (or children’s children) of the deceased are living.
Proportions here are also in the ratio of 2:1 for male: female.
Nephews and nieces are only entitled in the absence of brothers and sisters. This
means that they take the shares of the brothers/sisters of the deceased in their
absence. Hence a nephew/niece will receive what his/her parent (brother/sister
of the deceased) would have received if he/she was alive. They will also not
inherit if the children (or children’s children) of the deceased are living.
Proportions here are also 2:1 for male: female.
Answer no:2
A) RULE OF REPRESENTATION
ILLUSTRATION:
Take for instance a family tree wherein A is the common ancestor of two sons, B
and C. B has two children, D and E and C has two children F and G.
Rule of Exclusion:
Under Muslim law, the nearest heir to the ancestor excludes the remote heirs in
case of inheritance. If B dies in the lifespan of A, then upon A’s death, only C can
inherit the property of A. Thereby, C will exclude the children of B i.e. D and E from
having any right to inheritance over A’s property. Had doctrine of representation
been applicable to this case, then the heirs of B via D and E would have gained
rights to inheritance by representing B. This means that C would receive one- half
of A’s property and the other half would be shared by D and E.
REASON:
The reason that Muslim law does not apply the doctrine of representation is that
under Muslim law the right to inheritance does not arise until the time the
ancestor has died. This means that a right that is not vested with any particular
member, to begin with, cannot be passed on or be used by the deceased person’s
heirs.
B) RULE OF PRIMOGENITURE:
MEANING:
INHERITANCE LAWS:
Primogeniture is still used today in places where there are hereditary monarchies.
It was much more common, though, back in the days when much of the world
was still ruled by them. Inheritance laws were needed so that everyone knew who
the legitimate heir was, whether that was the eldest son or the eldest child. This
system often ended any problems before they started - but not always.
Explanation:
Imagine for a moment, that the father of a large extended family dies, and there
is no will. It's likely that siblings, cousins, even uncles and aunts would start
squabbling over possessions. Now imagine that the deceased was a king. Those
same family members are now squabbling over the kingship and using armies to
fight for it. Although there were inheritance laws that prescribed who would get
what, this didn't always eliminate fighting; when succession wasn't
straightforward or the proper heir had a defect or an illness of some kind, there
could be conflict over succession.
MOST COMMON FORMS OF PRIMOGENITURE:
Throughout Europe, Asia, and Africa, kingship was generally based on male-
preference Cognate or Agnatic rules. Male-preference Cognate primogeniture
was where a king's sons were all eligible for the throne before his daughters. If he
didn't have any living children, his brothers were next in line for the throne,
followed by his sisters.
Agnatic primogeniture was where either men or women could rule, but they had
to be descended from a male royal. So, all a king's children would be eligible for
the throne, but his daughters' children would not be. If a king had no living
children, his siblings would all be eligible, but not his sisters' children.
Most kingdoms also used the Semi-Salic Law, which meant that women could
inherit if there were no legitimate male heirs.
C) DOCTRINE OF HUJUB:
MEANING:
Sometimes, an heir may be deprived of inheriting due to the presence of another
heir. This concept is called hujub (exclusion).
TYPES OF HUJUB;
Hujub Nuqsaan
Hujub Hirmaan
This is when an heirs share is reduced due to the presence of another heir. A
quick example of this is the case of the husband; If the mayyit (deceased) leaves
behind no children, he (the husband) inherits 1/2. If the mayyit does leave behind
children, he will be partially excluded to 1/4.
Rule #1:
The following six people can never be fully excluded: Mother, Father, Daughter,
Son, Husband, and Wife. These are the six basic heirs; they
will always inherit something as long as they are alive. However, some of them
may be partially excluded sometimes. As mentioned previously, partial exclusion
will be discussed later.
Rule #2:
A Father (or father’s father i.e. paternal grandfather, or higher) and son (or son’s
son i.e. grandson, or lower) exclude all siblings. Doesn’t matter if they are
brothers, sisters, haqeeqi, allaati or akhyaafi. In the presence of a father,
grandfather (or higher) or son, grandson (or lower), all of them will be excluded.
Example 1:
Paternal grandfather
2 Haqeeqi brothers
3 Allaati sisters
2 Sons
Only the paternal grandfather and the 2 sons will inherit in this case.
Example 2:
2 Granddaughters
1 Grandson
1 Wife
3 Akhyaafi sisters
2 Haqeeqi brothers
1 Allaati brother
Rule#3:
A son excludes all grandchildren (however low down the line, male or female).
Example:
Father
Wife
Husband
2 Sons
3 Granddaughters
2 Grandsons
Rule #4:
A father excludes only his own parents (i.e. only paternal grandfather and
paternal grandmother, or higher). A mother, however, excludes all
B grandparents, not just her own parents (i.e. she excludes grandmothers on
B sides, maternal and paternal). She does not exclude paternal grandfather.
Example 1:
Father
Paternal grandfather
Paternal grandmother
Maternal grandmother
Son
The paternal grandfather and paternal grandmother will not inherit in this case.
Example 2:
Mother
Paternal grandfather
Maternal grandmother
Paternal great-grandmother (father’s mother’s mother)
Only the mother and paternal grandfather will inherit in this case.
Rule #5:
Just as the mother excludes all grandmothers (on either side, maternal and
paternal), the grandmother will also exclude all great-grandmothers (maternal
and paternal). This pattern continues infinitely. A mother or grandmother
(however high in the chain) excludes higher grandmothers (however high in the
chain) on either side of them (i.e. maternal and paternal).
Paternal grandmother
Maternal great-grandmother (mother’s mother’s mother)
Paternal great-grandmother (father’s father’s mother)
Son
Only the paternal grandmother and son will inherit in this case.
Rule #6:
Example 1:
Example 2:
2 Daughters
Paternal grandfather
2 Granddaughters
3 Grandsons
Rule #7:
Example 1:
3 Haqeeqi sisters
7 Allaaati sisters
5 Akhyaafi sisters
Mother
Example 2:
Rule #8:
2 Granddaughters
2 Haqeeqi sisters
3 Akhyaafi brothers
2 Akhyaafi sisters
The 3 akhyaafi brothers and 2 akhyaafi sisters will not inherit in this case.
D) DOCTRINE OF RETURN:
INTRODUCTION:
According to this Doctrine under the Muslim Law, the residue property returns to
the Sharers and not the Distant Kindred in absence of any heir under the
residuary category. If there is more than one Sharer then the property should be
returned in the proportionate shares and if there is one sharer then the whole of
the residue property should be transferred back to the sole sharer. The residue
cannot be transferred to the Distant Kindred because according to the rules, the
distant kindred do not get anything so long as there is a sharer or residuary alive.
EXPLANATION:
The question of ''return' arises only in the case of the sharers, because their
shares are fixed and determined. At times they exhaust the whole estate (e.g.
parents and two daughters, the parents receiving one-third, and two-thirds going
to the two daughters), and on other occasions they do not exhaust it (e.g. a
daughter and the mother, the former receiving half and the latter one-sixth).
In the latter case, the question arises as to what is to be done with the remaining
one-third and to whom should we return it. In the event of there being no specific
shares for the heirs (such as brother and uncles, who do not inherit as sharers)
the question of return does not arise.
SCHOOL OF THOUGHTS:
The four Sunni schools say: The excess of the sharers' shares is given to the
residuary. Hence if the deceased has a single daughter she will take half and the
remainder goes to the father; and in his absence, to the full or consanguine sisters
because they are residuaries with a daughter; and in their absence to the full
brother's son; and in his absence to the consanguine brother's son; and then, in
this order: the paternal uncle, the consanguine uncle and the paternal uncle's
son. In the absence of all of them, the excess will be returned to the sharers in the
proportion of their shares, except the husband and the wife, as they are not
entitled to the return.
For example;
if a decedent leaves behind mother and a daughter, the mother will take one-
sixth and the daughter half as their respective shares, and the remainder will be
given to them as 'return' by division into four parts, the mother receiving one-
fourth and the daughter three-fourths. Similarly, if he leaves behind a
consanguine and a uterine sister, the former will take the daughter's share and
the latter the mother's share.
The Shafi’I and the Maliki schools say: If there is no residuary, the remainder, after
the of the sharers' shares, will escheat to the bait al-mal.
The Imamiyyah observe: The sharers are entitled to the remainder in proportion
to their shares by way of 'return' if there exists no relative in their category; and if
such a relative exists, after the sharer takes his share the remainder will go to that
relative (e.g. when the mother and the father are heirs, after the mother takes
her determined share, the remainder shall go to the father).
If there exists with a sharer a relative who does not belong to his category, the
sharer will take his share and then also the remainder by way of 'return' (e.g.
when the decedent is survived by his mother and a brother, she, after taking one-
third as a sharer, will take the remainder by way of 'return,' the brother receiving
nothing because he belongs to the second category, while she belongs
assignment to the first category).
Answer no: 3
DISQUALIFICAN FROM INHERITANCE
Introduction:
Due too many reasons mainly personal in nature some people are disqualified
from inheriting any property; these reason are also known as “impediments to
inheritance” and it include followings conditions given below in detail.
Under Muslim law, just as in any other system of law, there are certain persons
who are, although heirs not entitled to a share in the inheritance on account of
their disqualifications. These disqualifications are several. We would discuss them
one by one.
1; Difference of Religion:
Explanation;
A Muslim who had renounced Islam, or had in any manner ceased to be a Muslim,
will, nonetheless, be entitled to inheritance in the property of his deceased
Muslim relation whose heir he is. But his non-Muslim descendants will not be
entitled to inherit the property of the deceased Muslim. At the same time, it
should be noticed that the inheritance to the property of a convert to Islam is
governed by Muslim law.
2; Murderer:
Under the Hanafi law an heir who has caused the death of the deceased
intentionally, inadvertently, by accident, mistake, or negligence is excluded from
inheritance. Under the Shia law the heir is disqualified only if the death is caused
intentionally.
Explanation;
This is a principle of general policy, and if followed in most systems of law that an
heir who has caused the murder of the deceased is disqualified from inheritance.
In the pre-Islamic Arabia the inheritance was tagged with blood-wide and blood-
feud, and in that system, a murderer could obviously not inherit. The principle
was adopted in the Islamic law and is recognized in all Muslim countries.
3; Estoppel in Succession:
During the lifetime of deceased if somebody had denied the relationship due to
which he could be entitled to some share as heir then after the death of the
deceased he cannot claim benefit of such share.
Explanation;
Under Muslim law a child in the womb of her mother is entitled to inherit, if it is
born alive. A still-born child is treated as having been born alive if its mother was
treated with violence as a consequence of which she gave birth to it. The law
among the Shias and the Sunnis in this regard is the same.
4; Illegitimate Children:
An illegitimate child is considered to be a children of mother under Sunni law and
is fully entitled to her inheritance but such children is treated as nobody in Shia
law and is not entitled to any inheritance from mother and father her and vice
versa.
Explanation;
Under the Hanafi law an illegitimate child is not entitled to inherit from its father,
but it is allowed to inherit from its mother. The mother can also inherit the
property of her illegitimate children. The illegitimate child inherits not merely the
property of its mother but also the property of all other relations with whom it is
related through the mother.
Thus, when a Hanafi female dies leaving behind her husband and an illegitimate
son of her sister, the husband will take 1/2 as sharer and the residue will go to
sister’s son. Since the illegitimate child cannot inherit from its father, it cannot
inherit from any other relation through the father.
Under the Ithana Ashari School, an illegitimate child is treated as nullius filius, and
cannot inherit the property of any of its parents. The question of its inheriting the
property from any other person through its parents does not arise.
Insanity and unchastely are not disqualifications under the Muslim law, and,
therefore, an insane or unchaste heir is entitled to inherit.
6; Childless widow:
Under Shia law, she cannot inherit land; however she is entitled to benefits out of
such property. Under the Ithana Ashari law, a childless widow is not entitled to a
share in her husband’s land, both agricultural as well as urban. However, she is
entitled to her share in the value of trees and buildings standing on the land as
well as share in the movable property of her husband. Immovable property
includes the debts due to her husband.
Explanation;
In Abdul Hammed Khan v. Peer Mira, it was held that a childless widow, in the
absence of other heirs, was entitled to inherit not merely her share but also rest
of the property including the land, of her husband by the application of the
doctrine of return.
7; Stepchildren:
Step children do not inherit from step relations and vice versa. Since stepparents
are not related to their stepchildren they are not entitled to inherit the property
of their stepchildren.
8; Apostasy:
An apostate cannot inherit from Muslim. As per Imam Abu Hanifa the property
earned by him as a Muslim will be distributed among his heirs and the property
earned as apostate will go to Bait-ul-mall while other Fuqha like Abu Yausaf,
Imam Shafia and Imam Malik hold the view that whole property will go to Bait-ul-
mall.
A child whose mother has been divorced by li’an was treated as illegitimate and
all the rules regarding illegitimacy shall apply inn such a case.
11; Slavery:
A slave person cannot own property because he himself is under control of other
person or somebody rules him. As slavery is abolished to modern era in present
time so this concept has no practical value.
THE END…..