Temporary Supervening Impossibility

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Temporary supervening impossibility

1. Temporary supervening impossibility is recognized in South African law, the effect, however is
that it suspends the obligations of the parties until the impossibility lapses. The impossibility,
however, should not be unreasonably long.

2. In World Leisure Holidays (Pty) Ltd v Georges   2002 (5) SA 531 (W) the court was asked
to consider the effect of temporary supervening impossibility of performance on the
obligations of the parties under a contract. On appeal, Cloete J found that temporary
impossibility of performance does not of itself bring the contract to an immediate end. Only
where the foundation of the contract has been destroyed, or where all or part of the
performance is already (or would inevitably become) impossible, is the creditor entitled to
regard the contract as having ended.1

3. Supersonic Tours (Pty) Ltd v South African Taxi Council [2001] JOL 9031 (T)

It is common cause that the defendant is a voluntary association with a legal persona. It
functions through its office bearers. With the removal from office of its functionaries it is
temporarily impossible for it to function. No one can consider or deal with its affairs. This
impossibility is an objective one. The impediment is in consequence of an order of court.

The concept of temporary impossibility is recognized by our law as suspending performance in a


contract. In the article "Temporary Supervening Impossibility of Performance", 94 South African
Law Journal (1977) 162 at 170 professor WA Ramsden expresses the following view:

"Temporary impossibility neither terminates an obligation nor gives rise to a right to terminate
an obligation. It merely suspends the duty to perform the obligation thus rendered temporarily
impossible while the impossibility continues."

The below are labour law cases:

4. Mokoatle v Commercial Industries National Provident Fund and Others (1) [2002] 1 BPLR 2989
(PFA) at para 24 – 25

An employee’s absence from work due to illness is normally regarded as a form of temporary
supervening impossibility of performance. As with all temporary supervening impossibility,
because non-performance is due to factors beyond the employee’s control, there is no breach of
the obligation to work and the operation of the contract is merely suspended for the duration of
the impossibility.

The contract itself, in its essential incidents, remains valid and in force. However, if the
impossibility lasts for an unreasonably long period, and is material or substantial, either party

1
may terminate the contract, provided the decision to terminate is communicated to the other
party: Brassey: The Effect of Supervening Impossibility of Performance on a Contract of
Employment; 1990 Acta Juridica 22 at 37; Joubert v Bester 1977 (4) SA 560 (T).

5. Rycroft and Jordan: A Guide to South African Labour Law at page 91

Where a contract has become totally and objectively impossible of performance after its
conclusion, the general rule is that the contract is discharged automatically, and that no further
liability for future performance or damage arises. If, on the other hand, the impossibility of
performance is only of a partial or temporary nature, discharge is not automatic.

You might also like