Audit Reports
Audit Reports
Audit Reports
AUDIT REPORTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you will be able to:
❑ Understand the meaning and Different types of Audit Reports as per
Standards of Auditing.
❑ Identify the different aspects of Reporting as per Standards of Auditing.
❑ Determine and apply knowledge of Reporting for further study and
Professional Practice.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Audit Report
1. INTRODUCTION
Assuming you are an auditor and have
concluded the audit field work, your next
step will be issuance of the audit report.
An audit report is very important medium
of communication i.e. auditor’s expert
views on the financial statements and it
has a significant bearing on the credibility
of such statements. By expressing views
in the report, the auditor takes upon
himself a great responsibility because a
large number of stakeholders are likely to
place reliance on the financial
statements. Therefore, the auditor is
necessarily required to be careful,
vigilant, and objective in the matter of
preparation of his report. The auditor
should endeavor to keep his report as
much simpler as possible but off course
complying with the applicable reporting
requirements.
Independent performed.
Auditor’s Report • To assist the user in
understanding those matters
that, in the auditor’s professional
judgment, were of most
significance in the audit of the
financial statements of the
current period.
SA-705 Modifications to • To issue an appropriate auditor’s 1st April 2018
(Revised) the Opinion in report when the auditor
the Independent considers the modification in the
Auditor’s Report report is necessary.
• To deal with the revised form and
content when the modification of
the opinion take place.
SA-706 Emphasis of To draw user’s attention to a matter 1st April 2018
(Revised) Matter or matters:-
Paragraphs and • Presented or disclosed in the
Other Matter financial statements and which is
Paragraphs in fundamental for the
the Independent understanding of the user, or
Auditor’s Report • Not presented or disclosed in
• the financial statement and
which is relevant for the
understanding of the user.
3.1 Purpose
SA 700 applies to an audit of a complete set of general-purpose financial statements and is written
in that context. The requirements of this SA are aimed at addressing an appropriate balance between
the need for consistency and comparability in auditor reporting globally and the need to increase the
value of auditor reporting by making the information provided in the auditor’s report more relevant
to users. This SA promotes consistency in the auditor’s report but recognizes the need for flexibility
to accommodate particular circumstances of individual jurisdictions. Consistency in the auditor’s
report, when the audit has been conducted in accordance with SAs, promotes credibility in the global
marketplace by making more readily identifiable those audits that have been conducted in
accordance with globally recognized standards. It also helps to promote the user’s understanding
and to identify unusual circumstances when they occur.
1. The overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements; and
2. Whether the financial statements, including the related notes, represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
In other words, the auditor shall express an unmodified opinion when the auditor concludes that the
financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable
financial reporting framework.
Source : accountlearning.com
1. Title: The auditor’s report shall have a title that clearly indicates that it is the re port of an
independent auditor.
2. Addressee: The auditor’s report shall be addressed as required by the circumstances of the
engagement.
(e) Specify the date of, or period covered by, each financial statement comprising the
financial statements.
When expressing an unmodified opinion on financial statements prepared in accordance with
a fair presentation framework, the auditor’s opinion shall, unless otherwise required by law or
regulation, use one of the following phrases, which are regarded as being equivalent:
(i) In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, […] in accordance with [the applicable financial reporting framework]; or
(ii) In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements give a true and fair view of […]
in accordance with [the applicable financial reporting framework].
When expressing an unmodified opinion on financial statements prepared in accordance with
a compliance framework, the auditor’s opinion shall be that the acc ompanying financial
statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the applicable financial
reporting framework].
If the reference to the applicable financial reporting framework in the auditor’s opinion is not
to Accounting Standards, the auditor’s opinion shall identify the origin of such other
framework.
4. Basis for Opinion: The auditor’s report shall include a section, directly following the Opinion
section, with the heading “Basis for Opinion”, that:
(a) States that the audit was conducted in accordance with Standards on Auditing;
(b) Refers to the section of the auditor’s report that describes the auditor’s
responsibilities under the SAs;
(c) Includes a statement that the auditor is independent of the entity in accordance
with the relevant ethical requirements relating to the audit, and has fulfilled the
auditor’s other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
The statement shall refer to the Code of Ethics issued by ICAI
(d) States whether the auditor believes that the audit evidence the auditor has
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for the auditor’s opinion.
5. Going Concern: Where applicable, the auditor shall report in accordance with SA 570.SA
570 deals with the auditor’s responsibilities in the audit of financial statements relating
to going concern and the implications for the auditor’s report. The auditor’s
responsibilities are to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding, and
conclude on, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of
accounting in the preparation of the financial statements, and to conclude, based on
the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists about the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
Implications on Auditor's
Report
Adequate Disclosure
of a Material Adequate Disclosure of a Consider the
An adverse Uncertainty Is Made in Material Uncertainty Is Not implications on
opinion the Financial Made in the Financial Audit report
Statements Statements
Unmodified opinion
Qualified/ adverse
and separate section
opinion and mention
"Material
in the basis of
Uncertainity related
opinion paragraph
to going concern"
Definition of Key Audit matter are those matters that, in the auditor’s professional
Key Audit judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial
Matters statements of the current period. Key audit matters are selected from
matters communicated with those charged with governance.
7. Responsibilities for the Financial Statements: The auditor’s report shall include a section
with a heading “Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements.” The auditor’s
report shall use the term that is appropriate in the context of the legal framework applicable
to the entity and need not refer specifically to “management”. In some entities, the appropriate
reference may be to those charged with governance.
This section of the auditor’s report shall describe management’s responsibility for:
This section of the auditor’s report shall also identify those responsible for the oversight of
the financial reporting process, when those responsible for such oversight are different from
those who fulfill the responsibilities described in next paragraph. In this case, the heading of
this section shall also refer to “Those Charged with Governance” or such term that is
appropriate in the context of the legal framework applicable to entity.
When the financial statements are prepared in accordance with a fair presentation framework,
the description of responsibilities for the financial statements in the auditor’s report shall refer
to “the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements” or “the preparation of
financial statements that give a true and fair view,” as appropriate in the circumstances.
8. Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements: The auditors report
shall include a section with the heading “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Statements.”
(I) This section of the auditor’s report shall:
(a) State that the objectives of the auditor are to:
(i) Obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error; and
(ii) Issue an auditor’s report that includes the auditor’s opinion.
(b) State that reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not
a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always
detect a material misstatement when it exists; and
(c) State that misstatements can arise from fraud or error, and either:
(i) Describe that they are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial
statements; or
(ii) Provide a definition or description of materiality in accordance with
the applicable financial reporting framework.
(II) The Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section
of the auditor’s report shall further:
To exercises professional judgment and maintains professional
skepticism throughout the audit as per SAs;
Auditor’s Responsibilities in Audit of FS
(a) State that, as part of an audit in accordance with SAs, the audito r exercises
professional judgment and maintains professional skepticism throughout the
audit; and
(b) Describe an audit by stating that the auditor’s responsibilities are:
resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
(ii) To obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the
audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. In circumstances
when the auditor also has a responsibility to express an opinion on
the effectiveness of internal control in conjunction with the audit of the
financial statements, the auditor shall omit the phrase that the
auditor’s consideration of internal control is not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control.
(iii) To evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures
made by management.
(iv) To conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the
going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence
obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. If the auditor concludes that a material
uncertainty exists, the auditor is required to draw attention in the
auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements
or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify the opinion. The
auditor’s conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to
the date of the auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions
may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going concern.
(v) When the financial statements are prepared in accordance with a fair
presentation framework, to evaluate the overall presentation,
structure and content of the financial statements, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the
underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair
presentation.
(c) When SA 600, “Using the Work of Another Auditor”, applies, further describe
the auditor’s responsibilities in a group audit engagement by stating, the
division of responsibility for the financial information of the entity by indicating
the extent to which the financial information of components is audited by the
other auditors have been included in the financial information of the entity, e.g.,
include the registration number of the firm, wherever applicable, as allotted by ICAI, in the
audit reports signed by them.
The report is to be signed by the maker of the report. Normally, a chartered accountant in
practice signs the report in the name he is registered as a practitioner. If he is an individual,
it may be his individual name or the firm name of which he is the sole proprietor. For those
members in practise as a partnership firm, it is usual for them to sign in the firm name. Under
Section 145 read with Section 141(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, only the person appointed
as an auditor of the company or, where a firm is so appointed, only the partner in the firm
who is a chartered accountant, may sign the auditor’s report or sign or authenticate any other
document of the company required by law to be signed or authenticated by the auditor.
It is obvious that the person appointed makes the report; otherwise the very essence of the
appointment of a particular man or firm will be lost. In a profession, the particular skill and
reputation of the practitioner counts considerably and if anybody else is allowed to make the
report on behalf of the person appointed, then this confidence in the person will cease to be
a factor. This has other implications also from the point of view of professional responsibility;
it will create an unusual legal situation. It also has implications from the standpoint of the
practitioner. If in respect of appointments held by him, the reports are made by others,
gradually the goodwill of the practitioner will end and the clients may shift to the person
actually making the report.
If A, B and C were in practice as ABC & Co. Chartered Accountants, any of A or B or C could
sign as “ABC & Co.” in his own hand. But now in view of the objection raised by the
Department of Company Affairs to this practice, the Council of the Institute in the SA 700
“The Auditor’s Report on Financial Statements” has recommended to the members who are
in practice in partnership, that signature on or authentication of the auditor’s report or any
other document required to be signed or authenticated by the auditor should be made in the
following manner.
3. For ABC and Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration Number
Signature
(Name of the Member Signing the Audit Report)
(Designation {Partner/Proprietor})
In addition to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 referred to above, Clause (12) of
Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 provides that a chartered
accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct if he allows a
person, not being a member of the Institute or a member not being his partner, to sign on his
behalf or on behalf of his firm, any balance sheet, profit and loss account, report or financial
statements. The provision is intended to safeguard the professional purity by excluding non-
chartered accountants from signing the aforesaid documents. By excluding chartered
accountants who are not partners, it seeks to keep the line of professional responsibility clear.
Partners are mutual agents and therefore, allowing a partner to sign does not interfere with
the clarity of responsibility.
12. Place of Signature: The auditor’s report shall name specific location, which is ordinarily the
city where the audit report is signed.
13. Date of the Auditor’s Report: The auditor’s report shall be dated no earlier than the date on
which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the
auditor’s opinion on the financial statements, including evidence that:
(7) Where applicable, a Basis for Qualified (or Adverse) Opinion section that addresses, and is
not inconsistent with, the reporting requirements of SA 570 (Revised).
(8) Where applicable, a section that includes the information required by SA 701, or additional
information about the audit that is prescribed by law or regulation and that addresses, and is
not inconsistent with, the reporting requirements in that SA 701.
(9) A description of management’s responsibilities for the preparation of the financial statements
and an identification of those responsible for the oversight of the financial reporting process
that addresses, and is not inconsistent with, the requirements.
(10) A reference to Standards on Auditing and the law or regulation, and a description of the
auditor’s responsibilities for an audit of the financial statements that addresses, and is not
inconsistent with, the requirements.
(11) The auditor’s signature.
(12) The Place of signature
(13) The date of the auditor’s report.
Students may note that the Chartered Accountants need to ensure compliance with all the
requirements relating to signature prescribed in the relevant law or regulation, SAs and relevant
announcements/ clarifications issued by ICAI on the matter including the requirement to mention
UDIN (mandatory from 1st July, 2019). The requirement to mention UDIN is applicable both for
manually and digitally signed reports/certificates including certificates uploaded online.
For detailed understanding, students may refer the following link:
https://resource.cdn.icai.org/59024aasb48128.pdf
(b) The auditor’s report includes, at a minimum, each of the elements set out in Auditor’s Report
Prescribed by Law or Regulation discussed above when the auditor uses the layout or
wording specified by the Standards on Auditing. However, reference to “law or regulation” in
above paragraph shall be read as reference to the Standards on Auditing. The auditor’s report
shall thereby identify such Standards on Auditing.
When the auditor’s report refers to both the ISAs or the auditing standards of a specific
jurisdiction and the Standards on Auditing issued by ICAI, the auditor’s report shall clearly
identify the same including the jurisdiction of origin of the other auditing standards.
If supplementary information that is not required by the applicable financial reporting framework
is:
For example:
4. When the notes to the financial statements include an explanation or the
reconciliation of the extent to which the financial statements comply with another
financial reporting framework, the auditor may consider this to be supplementary
information that cannot be clearly differentiated from the financial statements. the
auditor’s opinion would also cover notes or supplementary schedules that are cross
referenced from the financial statements.
5. When an additional profit and loss account that discloses specific items of
expenditure is disclosed as a separate schedule included as an appendix to the
financial statements, the auditor may consider this to be supplementary information
that can be clearly differentiated from the financial statements.
Auditor's
Opinion Opinion
Deals with expressed by
auditor's Deals with the auditor Basis for Opinion If Yes, then If no, then auditor will
responsibilit the form and when he supplementary evaluate whether
y to form an content of concludes that information will supplementary
Other Reporting
Responsibilities
If If management
Signature management refuses,
changes auditor will
then OK explain in the
Place of Signature auditor’s
report that
such
information
Date of Auditor's Report has not been
audited.
AUDIT REPORTS 6.19
4.1 Purpose
The purpose of communicating key audit matters is to enhance the communicative value of the
auditor’s report by providing greater transparency about the audit that was performed.
Communicating key audit matters provides additional information to intended users of the financial
statements (“intended users”) to assist them in understanding those matters that, in the auditor’s
professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the
current period. Communicating key audit matters may also assist intended users in understanding
the entity and areas of significant management judgment in the audited financial statements.
4.2 Scope
Communicating key audit matters in the auditor’s report is in the context of the auditor having formed
an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. Communicating key audit matters in the auditor’s
report is not:
(a) A substitute for disclosures in the financial statements that the applicable financial
reporting framework requires management to make, or that are otherwise necessary
to achieve fair presentation;
(b) A substitute for the auditor expressing a modified opinion when required by the
circumstances of a specific audit engagement in accordance with SA 705 (Revised);
(c) A substitute for reporting in accordance with SA 570 (Revised) when a material
uncertainty exists relating to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt
on an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern; or
(d) A separate opinion on individual matters.
(a) Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of
most significance in the audit of the financial statements [of the current period]; and.
(b) These matters were addressed in the context of the audit of the financial statements as a
whole, and in forming the auditor’s opinion thereon, and the auditor does not provide a
separate opinion on these matters.
Illustration 2
The following illustrates the presentation in the auditor’s report if the auditor has determined
there are no key audit matters to communicate:
Key Audit Matters
[Except for the matter described in the Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion section or
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern section,] We have determined that there are
no [other] key audit matters to communicate in our report.]
Report"`
Other
Scope of the Purpose of important
Communicating Objectives of Determing Key Communicating
SA the Auditor Audit Matters Key Audit Matters points to be
Key Audit Matters considered
1
AUDIT REPORTS 6.23
The decision regarding which type of modified opinion is appropriate depends upon:
(a) The nature of the matter giving rise to the modification, that is, whether the financial
statements are materially misstated or, in the case of an inability to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, may be materially misstated; and
(b) The auditor’s judgment about the pervasiveness of the effects or possible effects of the matter
on the financial statements.
5.2 Objective
The objective of the auditor is to express clearly an appropriately modified opinion on the financial
statements that is necessary when:
(a) The auditor concludes, based on the audit evidence obtained, that the financial statements
as a whole are not free from material misstatement; or
(b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement.
5.3 Circumstances When a Modification to the Auditor’s Opinion is
Required:
The auditor shall modify the opinion in the auditor’s report when:
The auditor concludes that, based on the audit The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient
evidence obtained, the financial statements as appropriate audit evidence to conclude that
a whole are not free from material the financial statements as a whole are free
misstatement; or from material misstatement.
section of our report, the aforesaid standalone financial statements give the information required by
the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting
principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of XYZ Ltd. as at March 31, 2021, and
profit/loss, for the year ended on that date.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
As discussed in Note 6, the Company’s financing arrangements are about to expire and the
Company has been unable to conclude renegotiations or obtain replacement financing. This s ituation
indicates that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not adequately disclose this matter.
5.4.2 Adverse Opinion: The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having
obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the
aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
ILLUSTRATION 4
ABC Ltd. is a company engaged in the manufacture of iron and steel bars. PP & Associates
are the statutory auditors of ABC Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. During the course of audit, CA
Prakash, the engagement partner, found that the Company’s financing arrangements have
expired and the amount outstanding was payable on March 31, 2021. The Company has
been unable to re-negotiate or obtain replacement financing and is considering filing for
bankruptcy. These events indicate a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt
on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be unable to
realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The
financial statements (and notes thereto) do not disclose this fact. What opinion should CA
Prakash express in case of ABC Ltd.?
SOLUTION:
In the present case based on the audit evidence obtained, CA Prakash has concluded that a
material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant dou bt on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and the entity is considering bankruptcy. The
financial statements of ABC Ltd. omit the required disclosures relating to the material uncertainty.
In such circumstances, CA Prakash should express an adverse opinion because the effects on
the financial statements of such omission are material and pervasive.
The relevant extract of the Adverse Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Adverse Opinion
paragraph is as under:
Adverse Opinion
In our opinion, because of the omission of the information mentioned in the Basis for Adverse
Opinion section of our report, the accompanying financial statements do not present fairly, the
financial position of the entity as at March 31, 2021, and of its financial performance and its
cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Basis for Adverse Opinion
The financing arrangements of ABC Ltd. has expired and the amount outstanding was payable
on March 31, 2021. The entity has been unable to conclude re-negotiations or obtain replacement
financing and is considering filing for bankruptcy. This situation indicates that a material
uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not adequately disclose this fact.
5.4.3 Disclaimer of Opinion: The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to
obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes
that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be
both material and pervasive. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare
circumstances involving multiple uncertainties, the auditor concludes that, notwithstanding having
obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding each of the individual uncertainties, it is not
possible to form an opinion on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the
uncertainties and their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements.
ILLUSTRATION 5
MNO Ltd. is a power generating company having its plants in the north eastern states of the country.
For the FY 2020-21, M/s PRT & Associates are the statutory auditors of the company. During the
course of audit, the audit team was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence a bout a
single element of the consolidated financial statements. That is, the auditor was also unable to obtain
audit evidence about the financial information of a joint venture investment (in XYZ Ltd.) that
represents over 90% of the entity’s net assets. What kind of opinion should the statutory auditors
issue in such case?
SOLUTION:
M/s PRT & Associates are unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the financial
information of a joint venture investment that represents over 90% of the entity’s net assets. The
possible effects of this inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence are both material and
pervasive to the consolidated financial statements.
Therefore, the statutory auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion paragraph is as under:
Disclaimer of Opinion
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of MNO Ltd. Because of
the significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our report,
we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit
opinion on these financial statements.
Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
The Group’s investment in its joint venture XYZ Company is carried at ` 95 crores on the Group’s
consolidated balance sheet, which represents over 90% of the Group’s net assets as at March 31,
2021. We were not allowed access to the management and the auditors of XYZ Company, including
XYZ Company’s auditors’ audit documentation. As a result, we were unable to determine whether
any adjustments were necessary in respect of the Group’s proportional share of XYZ Company’s
assets that it controls jointly, its proportional share of XYZ Company’s liabilities for which it is jointly
responsible, its proportional share of XYZ’s income and expenses for the year, (and the elements
making up the consolidated statement of changes in equity) and the consolidated cash flow
statement.
If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall
determine the implications as follows:
(a) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive, the auditor shall qualify the
opinion; or
(b) If the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected
misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive so that a qualification of the
opinion would be inadequate to communicate the gravity of the situation, the auditor shall:
(i) Withdraw from the audit, where practicable and possible under applicable law or
regulation; or
(ii) If withdrawal from the audit before issuing the auditor’s report is no t practicable or
possible, disclaim an opinion on the financial statements.
5.8 Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report When the Opinion is
Modified
When the auditor modifies the audit opinion, the auditor shall use the heading “Qualified Opinion,”
“Adverse Opinion,” or “Disclaimer of Opinion,” as appropriate, for the Opinion section.
What special consideration are required for expressing Qualified Opinion?
When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion due to a material misstatement in the financial
statements, the auditor shall state that, in the auditor’s opinion, except for the effects of the
matter(s) described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section:
(a) When reporting in accordance with a fair presentation framework, the accompanyin g
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects (or give a true and fair view of)
[…] in accordance with [the applicable financial reporting framework]; or
(b) When reporting in accordance with a compliance framework, the accompanying finan cial
statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with [the applicable
financial reporting framework].
When the modification arises from an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the
auditor shall use the corresponding phrase “except for the possible effects of the matter(s) ...” for
the modified opinion.
ILLUSTRATION 6:
CA Yash is the statutory auditor of Laksmi Vardhan Limited for the FY 2020-21. In respect of loans
and advances of ` 55,00,000/- given to Sarvagya Private Limited, the Company has not furnished
any agreement to CA Yash and in absence of the same, he is unable to verify the terms of repayment,
chargeability of interest and other terms.
What kind of opinion should CA Yash give in such situation?
SOLUTION:
In the present case, with respect to loans and advances of ` 55,00,000/- given to Sarvagya
Private Limited, the Company has not furnished any agreement to CA Yash. In absence of such
agreement, CA Yash is unable to verify the terms of repayment, chargeability of interest and other
terms. For an auditor, while verifying any loans and advances, one of the most important audit
evidences is the loan agreement. Therefore, the absence of such document in the present case,
tantamount to a material misstatement in the financial statements of the company. However, the
inability of CA Yash to obtain such audit evidence is though material but not pervasive so as to
require him to give a disclaimer of opinion.
Thus, in the present case, CA Yash should give a qualified opinion
The relevant extract of the Qualified Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Qualified Opinion
paragraph is as under:
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us,
except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion section of our
report, the financial statements of Laksmi Vardhan Limited give a true and fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company
as on 31.03.2021 and profit/ loss for the year ended on that date.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
The Company is unable to furnish the loan agreement with respect to loans and advances of `
flows for the year then ended in accordance with the Accounting Standards issued by the Institute
of Chartered Accountants of India.
Basis for Adverse Opinion
MSD Ltd. has faced an extraordinary event (earthquake), which destroyed a lot of business
activity of the company. Due to such event it may not be possible for the company to realize its
assets or pay off the liabilities during the regular course of its business. Thi s situation indicates
that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statement and notes to the financial statements of the
company do not disclose this fact.
What special consideration is required for expressing Disclaimer of Opinion?
When the auditor disclaims an opinion due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence, the auditor shall:
(a) State that the auditor does not express an opinion on the accompanying financial
statements;
(b) State that, because of the significance of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Disclaimer
of Opinion section, the auditor has not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(c) Amend the statement required in SA 700 (Revised), which indicates that the financial
statements have been audited, to state that the auditor was engaged to audit the financial
statements.
ILLUSTRATION 8:
CA Abhimanyu is the statutory auditor of PQR Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. During the course
of audit CA Abhimanyu noticed the following:
1. With respect to the debtors amounting to ` 150 crores, no balance confirmation was
received by the audit team. Further, there have been defaults on the payment
obligations by debtors on the due dates during the year under audit. The Company
has created a provision for doubtful debts to the tune of `25 Cr. during the year
under audit. The Company has stated that the provision is based on receivables
which are older than 36 months, which according to the audit team is inadequate
and as such the audit team is unable to ascertain the carrying value of trade
receivables.
2. Further, in respect of Inventories (which constitutes 40% of the total assets of the
company), during the reporting period, the management has not undertaken
physical verification of inventories at periodic intervals. Also, the Company has not
maintained adequate inventory records at the factory. The audit team was unable to
undertake the physical inventory count as such the value of inventory could not be
verified.
Under the above circumstances what kind of opinion should CA Abhimanyu give?
SOLUTION:
In the present case, CA Abhimanyu is unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence
with respect to the following:
1. The balance confirmation with respect to debtors amounting to ` 150 crores is not
available. Further there has been default in payment by the debtors and the provision so
made is not adequate. The audit team is also unable ascertain the carrying value of trade
receivables.
2. With respect to 40% of the company’s inventory, neither the physical verification has be en
done by the management nor are adequate inventory records maintained. The audit team
is also unable to undertake the physical inventory count as such the value of inventory
could not be verified.
In the above two circumstances the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence on which to base the opinion, and the possible effects on the financial statements of
undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive.
Thus, CA Abhimanyu should give a Disclaimer of Opinion.
The relevant extract of the Disclaimer of Opinion Paragraph and Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion paragraph is as under:
Disclaimer of Opinion
We do not express an opinion on the accompanying financial statements of PQR Ltd. Because of
the significance of the matters described in the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of our
report, we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis
for an audit opinion on these financial statements.
Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
We are unable to obtain balance confirmation with respect to the debtors amounting to ` 150
crores. Further, there have been defaults on the payment obligations by debtors on the due dates
during the year under audit. The Company has created a provision for doubtful debts to the tune
of `25 Cr. during the year under audit which is inadequate in the circumstances of the company.
The carrying value of trade receivables could not be ascertained.
Further, in respect of Inventories (which constitutes 40% of the total assets of the company),
during the reporting period, the management has not undertaken physical verification of
inventories at periodic intervals. Also, the Company has not maintained adequate inventory
records at the factory. We were unable to undertake the physical inventory count and as such the
value of inventory could not be verified.
Unless required by law or regulation, when the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor’s report shall not include a Key Audit Matters section in accordance with
SA 701.
matters of which the auditor is aware that would have required a modification to the opinion, and the
effects thereof.
How Auditor should give description of Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Statements When the Auditor Disclaims an Opinion on the Financial Statements?
When the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial statements due to an inability to obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall amend the description of the auditor’s
responsibilities required by SA 700 (Revised) to include only the following:
(a) A statement that the auditor’s responsibility is to conduct an audit of the entity’s financial
statements in accordance with Standards on Auditing and to issue an auditor’s report;
(b) A statement that, however, because of the matter(s) described in the Basis for Disclaimer of
Opinion section, the auditor was not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to
provide a basis for an audit opinion on the financial statements; and
(c) The statement about auditor independence and other ethical responsibilities required in SA
700.
Nature of Matter Giving Rise to the Auditor’s judgment about the Pervasiveness of
Modification: the Effects or Possible Effects on the Financial
Statements
Withdraw
Qualified from the
Opinion
6.35
engagement
or disclaimer
of opinion
6.36 ADVANCED AUDITING AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
• When facts become known to the auditor after the date of the auditor’s report and
the auditor provides a new or amended auditor’s report (i.e., subsequent events).
ILLUSTRATION 9:
In respect of the audit of BDS Ltd., the statutory auditor of the company noticed some
matters. The statutory auditor wants to draw the user’s attention towards such matters,
though his opinion is not modified in respect of such matters. Draft the relevant paragraphs
of the audit report for the following matters:
i. The company has a plan to resume its construction activities with respect to one
of its thermal power project, The activity of such power plant was suspended in the
FY 2018-19. The thermal power project comprises of the plant and equipment
amounting to ` 5.95 crore and capital work in progress of ` 147.50 crore.
ii. The financial statements of 5 branches are included in the Standalone Financial
Statements of BDS Ltd. whose financial statements reflect total assets of ` 90
crores as at 31.03.2021 and total revenue from operations of ` 40 crores for the
year ended on that date. The financial statements of these branches have been
audited by the branch auditors.
SOLUTION:
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to the following note of the standalone financial statements:
Note 27 regarding the plans of the Company to resume construction/developmental activities of
a thermal power project. The carrying amounts related to the project as at 31st March, 2021
comprise of plant and equipment of ` 5.95 crore and capital work in progress of ` 147.50 crore.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Other Matter
We did not audit the financial statements of 5 branches included in the Standalone Financial
Statements of the company whose financial statements reflect total assets of ` 90 crores as at
31.03.2021 and total revenue from operations of ` 40 crores for the year ended on that date. The
financial statements of these branches have been audited by the branch auditors whose reports
have been furnished to us, and our opinion in so far as it relates to the amounts and disclosures
included in respect of these branches, is based solely on the report of the branch auditors.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Relationship between Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Key Audit Matters in the
Auditor’s Report
Key audit matters— Those matters that, in Emphasis of Matter paragraph – A
the auditor’s professional judgment, were of paragraph included in the auditor’s report
most significance in the audit of the financial that refers to a matter appropriately
statements of the current period. Key audit presented or disclosed in the financial
matters are selected from matters statements that, in the auditor’s judgment,
communicated with those charged with is of such importance that it is fundamental
governance. [SA 701] to users’ understanding of the financial
statements.[SA 706]
Matters that are determined to be key audit A widespread use of Emphasis of Matter
matters in accordance with SA 701 may also paragraphs may diminish the effectiveness
be, in the auditor’s judgment, fundamental of the auditor’s communication about such
to users’ understanding of the financial matters.
statements. In such cases, in Use of Emphasis of Matter paragraphs is
communicating the matter as a key audit not a substitute for a description of
matter in accordance with SA 701, the individual key audit matters where SA 701
auditor may wish to highlight or draw further is applicable.
attention to its relative importance. There may be a matter that is not
Communicating key audit matters provides determined to be a key audit matter in
additional information to intended users of accordance with SA 701 (i.e., because it did
the financial statements to assist them in not require significant auditor attention),
understanding those matters that, in the but which, in the auditor’s judgment, is
auditor’s professional judgment, were of fundamental to users’ understanding of the
most significance in the audit and may also financial statements (e.g., a subsequent
assist them in understanding the entity and event). If the auditor considers it necessary
areas of significant management judgment to draw users’ attention to such a matter,
in the audited financial statements. the matter is included in an Emphasis of
Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report in
accordance with this SA.
The communication of key audit matters in The auditor may do so by presenting the
the auditor’s report may also provide matter more prominently than other matters
intended users a basis to further engage in the Key Audit Matters section (e.g., as the
with management and those charged with first matter) or by including additional
governance about certain matters relating to information in the description of the key
the entity, the audited financial statements, audit matter to indicate the importance of
or the audit that was performed. the matter to users’ understanding of the
financial statements.
SA-706
Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in
the Independent Auditor’s Report
Scope
• This SA deals with additional communication in the auditor’s report when the auditor considers it necessary to draw users’
attention to a matter or matters
• (a) presented or disclosed in the financial statements that are of such importance that they are fundamental to users’
understanding of the financial statements; or
• (b) other than those presented or disclosed in the financial statements that are relevant to users’ understanding of the
audit, the auditor’s responsibilities or the auditor’s report.
Objectives
• The objective of the auditor, having formed an opinion on the financial statements, is to draw users’ attention, when in the
auditor’s judgment it is necessary to do so, by way of clear additional communication in the auditor’s report, to:
(a)A matter, although appropriately presented or disclosed in the financial statements, that is of such importance that it is
fundamental to users’ understanding of the financial statements; or
(b)As appropriate, any other matter that is relevant to users’ understanding of the audit, the auditor’s responsibilities or the
auditor’s report.
Definitions
• Emphasis of Matter paragraph : A paragraph included in the auditor’s report that refers to a matter appropriately presented or
disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is of such importance that it is fundamental to users
understanding of the financial statements.
• Other Matter paragraph: A paragraph included in the auditor’s report that refers to a matter other than those presented or
disclosed in the financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is relevant to users’ understanding of the audit, the auditor’s
responsibilities or the auditor’s report.
Requirements
• Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs in the Auditor’s Report
• When the auditor includes an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
• (a) Include the paragraph within a separate section of the auditor’s report with an appropriate heading that includes the
term “Emphasis of Matter”;
• (b) Include in the paragraph a clear reference to the matter being emphasized and to where relevant disclosures that fully
describe the matter can be found in the financial statements. The paragraph shall refer only to information presented or
disclosed in the financial statements; and
• (c) Indicate that the auditor’s opinion is not modified in respect of the matter emphasized.
• Other Matter Paragraphs in the Auditor’s Report
If the auditor considers it necessary to communicate a matter other than those that are presented or disclosed in the
financial statements that, in the auditor’s judgment, is relevant to users’ understanding of the audit, the auditor’s
responsibilities or the auditor’s report, the auditor shall include an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report, provided:
• (a)This is not prohibited by law or regulation; and
• (b)When SA 701 applies, the matter has not been determined to be a key audit matter to be communicated in the auditor’s
report.
The auditor shall include the paragraph within a separate section with the heading “Other Matter,” or other appropriate
heading.
• Communication with Those Charged with Governance
• If the auditor expects to include an Emphasis of Matter or an Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report, the auditor
shall communicate with those charged with governance regarding this expectation and the wording of this paragraph.
The auditor shall determine the appropriate person(s) within the entity’s governance structure with
whom to communicate. If the auditor communicates with a subgroup of those charged with
governance, for example, an audit committee, or an individual, the auditor shall determine whether
the auditor also needs to communicate with the governing body .
with person(s) with management responsibilities adequately informs all of those with whom the
auditor would otherwise communicate in their governance capacity. (Ref: Para. A8)
(a) The auditor’s views about significant qualitative aspects of the entity’s accounting
practices, including accounting policies, accounting estimates and financial statement
disclosures. When applicable, the auditor shall explain to those charged with governance
why the auditor considers a significant accounting practice, that is acceptable under the
applicable financial reporting framework, not to be most appropriate to the particular
circumstances of the entity;
(b) Significant difficulties, if any, encountered during the audit;
(c) Unless all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity:
i. Significant matters arising during the audit that were discussed, or subject to
correspondence, with management; and
ii. Written representations the auditor is requesting;
(d) Circumstances that affect the form and content of the auditor’s report, if any; and
(e) Any other significant matters arising during the audit that, in the auditor’s professional
judgment, are relevant to the oversight of the financial reporting process.
Advocacy
Self-review Familiarity
threats, which
Self-interest threats, which threats, which Intimidation
may occur when
threats, which may occur when may occur when, threats, which
a professional
may occur as a a previous because of a may occur when
accountant
result of the judgement needs relationship, a a professional
promotes a
financial or other to be re- professional accountant may
position or
interests of a evaluated by the accountant be deterred from
opinion to the
professional professional becomes too acting objectively
point that
accountant or of accountant sympathetic to by threats, actual
subsequent
a relative*; responsible for the interests of or perceived.
objectivity may
that judgement; others; and
be compromised;
The nature and significance of the threats may differ depending on whether they arise in relation to
the provision of services to a financial statement audit client*, a non- financial statement audit
assurance client* or a non-assurance client.
10.1 Meaning- Self Review Threats
Self-review threats, which occur when during a review of any judgement or conclusion reached in a
previous audit or non-audit engagement, or when a member of the audit team was previously a
director or senior employee of the client. Instances where such threats come into pla y are
(i) when an auditor having recently been a director or senior officer of the company, and
(ii) when auditors perform services that are themselves subject matters of audit.
14. Circumstances that may create self-review threats include, but are not
limited to:
The discovery of a significant error during a re-evaluation of the work of
the professional accountant in public practice.
Reporting on the operation of financial systems after being involved in their design
or implementation.
Having prepared the original data used to generate records that are the subject
matter of the engagement.
• Ensure that comparative information agrees with the amount and other disclosure
presented in the prior period.
• The accounting policies applied are consistent with those applied in current period.
• If there have been any changes in the application of accounting policies than they are
properly disclosed and presented.
(b) Evaluating the impact on financial statement: If the auditor becomes aware of any possible
misstatement in the comparative information, then:
• He should perform the necessary audit procedures to obtain sufficient audit evidence.
• If the auditor had audited the prior period’s financial statement than he should follow
the relevant requirements of SA 560.
(c) Written Representation: As required by SA 580, the auditor should also request written
representation. He should also obtain a specific written representation regarding any prior
period item that is disclosed in current year’s financial statement.
the management and request that the predecessor auditor be informed. If then the
prior years statements are amended with new report by the predecessor auditor,
then the auditor shall report only on the current period.
(c) Reporting treatment common to both (for corresponding figures and comparative
information):
(i) If the financial statement of the prior period were audited by a predecessor auditor,
the auditor (is permitted by law or regulation to refer to the predecessor audit report
– on case of corresponding figures and decides to do so) shall state in his audit
report:
• That the financial statement of the prior period were audited by a
predecessor auditor;
• The type of the opinion expressed by the predecessor auditor;
• The date of that audit report.
(ii) If the prior period financial statement were not audited than he shall report the same
in other matter paragraph in his audit report that the corresponding/comparative
figures are unaudited. However, the disclosure does not relieve him from his
responsibility of obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the open ing
balances do not contain misstatements that materially affect the current period’s
financial statements.
(Note: Students are advised to refer Series of SA 700 on Audit Reporting and Conclusion for
better understanding)
1. With Reference to
Assess the consistency of corresponding figures, auditor 2. With Reference to
accounting policies used opinion should refer in his comparative figures
opinion only when
Obtain Written
representation d) If prior period FS unaudited,
mention the same in the AR
Other Matter
The financial statements of ABC Company for the year ended March 31, 20X0, were audited by
another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on those statements on March 31, 20X1.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial
Statements
[Reporting in accordance with SA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in SA 700 (Revised) given in
Auditing Pronouncement.]
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
[Reporting in accordance with SA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in SA 700 (Revised).]
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
[Reporting in accordance with SA 700 (Revised) – see Illustration 1 in SA 700 (Revised).]
Relevant Note given by the management in the financial statements of India Branch Office of
ABC Limited
"During the year, ABC Limited (‘the Company’) has incorporated a private limited company ('XYZ
Private Limited') in India for the purpose of furtherance of the Company’s objectives and has entered
into a Business Transfer Agreement dated October 5, 2016 with XYZ Private Limited for transfer of
all assets and liabilities alongwith the business of India Branch Office to XYZ Private Limited on
going concern basis effective April 01, 2016. Further, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide letter No.
…………………. dated December 22, 2016 has also granted approval for transfer of assets and
liabilities and business of India Branch Office to XYZ Private Limited.
ABC Limited has confirmed that it shall provide continuing financial and operational support to its
Branch Office in India for its operations during the transitional period and loss incurred post the date
of transfer of business to XYZ Private Limited, if any, shall be borne by ABC Limited
The current year financial statements of India Branch Office have been prepared on the basis that
the Branch Office does not continue to be a going concern and all its assets are carried in the books
of accounts at the values likely to be recovered at the time of closure of operations, to the extent
ascertainable at the time of preparation of these financial statements".
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Members of India Branch Office of ABC Limited
Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the standalone financial statements of India Branch Office of ABC Limited (“the
Company”), which comprise the balance sheet as at March 31, 20X1, and the statement of Profit &
Loss, (statement of changes in equity) and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and
notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies and other
explanatory information.
In our opinion, and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us the
aforesaid financial statements, give a true and fair view, in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the India Branch Office of the Company as at
st
March 31 , 2XXX and profit/loss, (changes in equity) and its cash flows for the year ended on that
date.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs). Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements as per the ICAI’s Code of
Ethics and the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to Note XX regarding India Branch Office management’s intention to close the
operations of the Branch Office subject to regulatory approvals. Accordingly, the financial statements
have been prepared on the basis that the India Branch Office does not continue to be a going
concern and provisions have been made in the books of account for the losses arising or likely to
arise on account of closure of operations including the losses on the realizability of curre nt assets.
Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
(b) Attention is invited to Note____ which explains management assessment regarding advances
of `____ paid to certain project managers including `____ paid during earlier years. The
Company has incurred expenses on account of travel at various sites in cash and has closing
balance of `1,75 crores against which management has obtained confirmation from
respective project managers for balances aggregating ` 0.65 crores and has provided
balance amount of `1.1 crores as provision for doubtful advances. Further, for such
transactions, the Company has not complied with provision for deduction of taxes at source.
We strongly recommend that management should undertake these transactions through
banking channels and in the absence of any confirmations, we are unable to confirm the
completeness of expenses as at year- end and consequential adjustment required to closing
tax liabilities and interest thereupon, if any.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs). Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of
the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in
accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements as per the ICAI’s Code of Ethics and the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013,
and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion, except for the matters, discussed above.
Financial Reporting Framework (XYZ Laws) of Jurisdiction X (that is, a financial reporting
framework, encompassing law or regulation, designed to meet the common financial
information needs of a wide range of users, but which is not a fair presentation framework).
• The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility for
the financial statements in SA 210.
• The auditor has concluded an unmodified (i.e., “clean”) opinion is appropriate based on the
audit evidence obtained.
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are those of the jurisdiction.
• Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material uncertainty
does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with SA 570 (Revised).
• The auditor is not required, and has otherwise not decided, to communicate key audit matters
in accordance with SA 701.
• Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible for
the preparation of the financial statements.
• The auditor has no other reporting responsibilities required under local law.
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of ABC & Associates (the entity), which comprise the
balance sheet as at March 31, 20X1, and the Profit and Loss Account (and the cash flow
statement)1 for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, includ ing a summary
of significant accounting policies.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements of the entity are prepared, in all material
respects, in accordance with XYZ Laws.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Standards on Auditing (SAs). Our responsibilities
under those Standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the entity in accordance with
the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements, and we have
fulfilled our other responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis fo r our opinion.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial
Statements2
1
Where applicable.
2
Or other terms that are appropriate in the context of the legal framework of the particular entity.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with
XYZ Law and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the entity’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and
using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the
entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so .
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the entity’s financial reporting
process.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial stat ements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s
report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with SAs will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Paragraph 40(b) of this SA explains that the shaded material below can be located in an Appendix
to the auditor’s report. Paragraph 40(c) explains that when law, regulation or national auditing
standards expressly permit, reference can be made to a website of an appropriate authority that
contains the description of the auditor’s responsibilities, rather than including this material in the
auditor’s report, provided that the description on the website addresses, and is not inconsistent
with, the description of the auditor’s responsibilities below.
As part of an audit in accordance with SAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain
professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and
obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for
one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control .3
3
This sentence would be modified, as appropriate, in circumstances when the auditor also has responsibility to issue an opinion on the
effectiveness of internal control in conjunction with the audit of the financial statements.
4
SA 210, Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
Note : Students are advised to refer Illustrations of Auditor’s Reports with Modifications to
the Opinion given in SA 705.
5 The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
6 As may be applicable.
7 As may be applicable.
8
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title “Report on Other
Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
9 Where applicable.
10
Where applicable.
Illustration of an Auditor’s Report that Includes a Key Audit Matters Section, an Emphasis
of Matter Paragraph, and an Other Matter Paragraph
For purposes of this illustrative auditor’s report, the following circumstances are assumed:
• Audit of a complete set of financial statements of a listed company (registered under the
companies Act, 2013) using a fair presentation framework.
• The financial statements are prepared by management of the entity in accordance with the
Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 (a general
purpose framework).
• The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility
for the financial statements in SA 210.
• The auditor has concluded an unmodified (i.e., “clean”) opinion is appropriate based on
the audit evidence obtained.
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are those of the ICAI’s Code of
Ethics and the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
• Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material
uncertainty does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt
on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with SA 570 (Revised).
• Between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report, there was
a fire in the entity’s production facilities, which was disclosed by the entity as a subsequent
event. In the auditor’s judgment, the matter is of such importance that it is fundamental to
users’ understanding of the financial statements. The matter did not require signific ant
auditor attention in the audit of the financial statements in the current period.
• Key audit matters have been communicated in accordance with SA 701.
• Corresponding figures are presented, and the prior period’s financial statements were
audited by a predecessor auditor. The auditor is not prohibited by law or regulation from
referring to the predecessor auditor’s report on the corresponding figures and has decided
to do so.
• Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible
for the preparation of the financial statements.
• In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other reporting
responsibilities required under the Companies Act, 2013.
11 1
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
12 As may be applicable
13 As noted in paragraph A16, an Emphasis of Matter paragraph may be presented either directly before or after the Key Audit Matters section
based on the auditor’s judgment as to the relative significance of the information included in the Emphasis of Matter paragraph.
• The terms of the audit engagement reflect the description of management’s responsibility
for the financial statements in SA 210.
• A departure from the applicable financial reporting framework resulted in a qualified
opinion.
• The relevant ethical requirements that apply to the audit are the ICAI’s Code of Ethics and
the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
• Based on the audit evidence obtained, the auditor has concluded that a material
uncertainty does not exist related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt
on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern in accordance with SA 570 (Revised).
• Between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report, there was
a fire in the entity’s production facilities, which was disclosed by the entity as a subsequent
event. In the auditor’s judgment, the matter is of such importance that it is fundamental to
users’ understanding of the financial statements. The matter did not require significant
auditor attention in the audit of the financial statements in the current period.
• The auditor is not required, and has otherwise not decided, to communicate key audit
matters in accordance with SA 701.
• Those responsible for oversight of the financial statements differ from those responsible
for the preparation of the financial statements.
• In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other repor ting
responsibilities required under the Companies Act, 2013.
14
The sub-title “Report on the Audit of the Standalone Financial Statements” is unnecessary in circumstances when the second sub-title
“Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements” is not applicable.
section.” As an expert you are required to brief the special considerations required for
expressing:
(a) Qualified Opinion;
(b) Adverse Opinion and
(c) Disclaimer of Opinion.
6. ADKS & Co LLP are the newly appointed statutory auditors of PKK Ltd. During the course of
audit, the statutory auditors have come across certain significant observations which they
believe could lead to material misstatement of financial statements. Management has a
different view and does not concur with the view of the statutory auditors. Considering this
the statutory auditors are determining as to how to address these observations in terms of
their reporting requirement. Please advise.
7. KPI Ltd is a joint venture of KPI Inc, a company based in US, and OPQ Ltd, a company based
in Japan (hereinafter referred to as ‘JV partners’). KPI Ltd was regis tered in India and is
operating as a marketing support company for KPI Inc. All the costs of KPI Ltd are incurred
in India and entire revenue of KPI Inc is generated in USD. The entire funding requirements
of KPI Ltd are taken care of by the JV partners. Since KPI Ltd is based in India, hence it is
also required to get its financial statements audited.
The company appointed new auditors for the audit of the financial statements for the year
ended 31 March 2020 after doing all appointment formalities wherein auditors are required to
ensure compliance with Standards on Auditing and Internal Standards on Auditing.
As an expert you are required to advise the auditor about the requirements regarding auditor’s
report for audits conducted in accordance with both Standards on Auditing issued by ICAI
and International Standards on Auditing.
8. TUV Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of manufacture of spare parts. Saroj &
Associates are the statutory auditors of the company for the FY 2020-21. During the course
of audit, CA Saroj noticed that the company had a major customer, namely, Korean Mart from
South Korea. Owing to an outbreak of war and subsequent destruction leading to government
ban on import and export in South Korea, the demand from Korean Mart for the products of
TUV Ltd. ended for an unforeseeable time period. When discussed with the management, CA
Saroj was told that the company is in the process of identifying new customers for their
products. CA Saroj understands that though the use of going concern assumption is
appropriate but a material uncertainty exists with respect to the identification of new
customers. This fact is duly reflected in the financial statements of TUV Ltd. for the FY 2020 -
21. How should CA Saroj deal with this matter in the auditor’s report for the FY 2020-21?
9. Sun Moon Ltd. is a power generating company which uses coal as raw material for its power
generating plant. The company has been allotted coal blocks in the state of Jharkhand and
Odhisa. During the FY 2020-21, a scam regarding allotment of coal blocks was unveiled
leading to a ban on the allotment of coal blocks to various companies including Sun Moon
Ltd. This happened in the month of December 2020 and as such entire power generation
process of Sun Moon Ltd, came to a halt in that month. As a result of such ban, and the
resultant stoppage of the production process, many key managerial personnel of the company
left the company. There were delays in the of payment of wages and salaries and the banks
from whom the company had taken funds for project financing also decided not to extend
further finance or to fund further working capital requirements of the company.
Further, when discussed with the management, the statutory auditor understood that the
company had no action plan to mitigate such circumstances. Further, all such circumstances
were not reflected the the financial statements of Sun Moon Ltd. What course of action should
the statutory auditor of the company consider in such situation?
10. CA Omkar is the statutory auditor of Sabhyata Ltd. for the FY 2020-21. The company is
engaged in the business of manufacture of floor tiles. During the course of audit, CA Omkar
obtained certain audit evidence which were not consistent with the affirmation made in the
financial statements. Discuss as to how CA Omkar should deal with the situation in the
auditor’s report.
opinion on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the uncertainties
and their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements.
If, after accepting the engagement, the auditor becomes aware that management has
imposed a limitation on the scope of the audit that the auditor considers likely to result
in the need to express a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor shall request that management remove the limitation.
If management refuses to remove the limitation, the auditor shall communicate the
matter to those charged with governance, unless all of those charged with
governance are involved in managing the entity, and determine whether it is
possible to perform alternative procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence.
7. Refer Para 3.4
8. As per SA 570, “Going Concern”, loss of a major market or a key customer is one of the
operating indicators that may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a
going concern.
In the present case, TUV Ltd. has a key customer in South Korea from which the demand for
its products has ended on account of outbreak of war, subsequent destruction and
government ban on import and export in South Korea. Further, the company has not yet
identified new customers and is in the process of doing the same. As such, the identification
of new customer is a material uncertainty that cast a significant doubt on the company’s ability
to continue as a going concern.
However, this matter is duly disclosed by the management of TUV Ltd. in the financial
statements for the year ended 31.03.2021.
As such, considering that the going concern assumption is appropriate but a material
uncertainty exists with respect to identification of new customer, CA Saroj should:
(1) Express an unmodified opinion and
(2) Include in his audit report, a separate section under the heading “Material Uncertainty
Related to Going Concern” to:
(i) Draw attention to the note in the financial statements that discloses the matters
and
(ii) State that these events or conditions indicate that a material uncertainty exists
that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern and that the auditor’s opinion is not modified in respect of the matter.
Thus, CA Saroj should deal with this matter in his auditor’s report in the above mentioned
manner.
9. SA 570- “Going Concern” deals with the auditor’s responsibilities in the audit of financial
statements relating to going concern and the implications for the auditor’s report.
The auditor’s responsibilities are to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding,
and conclude on, the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of
accounting in the preparation of the financial statements, and to conclude, based on the audit
evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists about the entity’s ability to continue
as a going concern.
When the use of Going Concern Basis of Accounting Is Inappropriate i.e. if the financial
statements have been prepared using the going concern basis of accounting but, in the
auditor’s judgment, management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is inappropriate, the auditor shall express an adverse
opinion.
Also when adequate Disclosure of a Material Uncertainty Is Not Made in the Financial
Statements the auditor shall:
(i) Express a qualified opinion or adverse opinion, as appropriate, in accordance with SA
705 (Revised); and
(ii) In the Basis for Qualified (Adverse) Opinion section of the auditor’s report, state that
a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s abil ity to
continue as a going concern and that the financial statements do not adequately
disclose this matter.
In the present case, the following circumstances indicate the inability of Sun Moon Ltd. to
continue as a going concern:
• Ban on the allotment of coal blocks
• Halt in power generation
• Key Managerial Personnel leaving the company.
• Banks decided not to extend further finance and not to fund the working capital
requirements of the company.
• Non availability of sound action plan to mitigate such circumstances.
Therefore, considering the above factors it is clear that the going concern basis is
inappropriate for the company. Further, such circumstances are not reflected in the financial
statements of the company. As such, the statutory auditor of Sun Moon Ltd. should:
(1). Express an adverse opinion in accordance with SA 705 ( Revised) and
(2). In the Basis of Opinion paragraph of the auditor’s report, the statutory auditor should
state that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern and that the financial statements do not
adequately disclose this matter.
10. SA 705 deals with the auditor’s responsibility to issue an appropriate report in circumstances
when, in forming an opinion in accordance with SA 700 (Revised), the auditor concludes that
a modification to the auditor’s opinion on the financial statements is necessary.
The decision regarding which type of modified opinion is appropriate depends upon:
(a) The nature of the matter giving rise to the modification, that is, whether the financial
statements are materially misstated or, in the case of an inability to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, may be materially misstated; and
(b) The auditor’s judgment about the pervasiveness of the effects or possible effects of
the matter on the financial statements.
Further, the auditor shall modify the opinion in the auditor’s report when the auditor concludes
that based on the audit evidence obtained, the financial statements as a whole are not free
from material misstatement.
In the present case, during the course of audit, CA Omkar obtained certain audit evidence
which were not consistent with the affirmation made in the financial statements. Therefore,
CA Omkar should modify his report in accordance with SA 705- “Modifications To The Opinion
In The Independent Auditor’s Report.
CA Omkar should issue either a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion depending upon the
circumstances of the case:
(a) CA Omkar shall express a qualified opinion when, having obtained sufficient
appropriate audit evidence, he concludes that misstatements, individually or in the
aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements
(b) CA Omkar shall express an adverse opinion, when the auditor, having obtained
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in
the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
Thus, since CA Omkar has obtained audit evidence which are inconsistent with the
affirmations made in the financial statement, CA Omkar should modify his opinion as per the
circumstances of the case.