A - Cross-Sectional - Study - of - Eruption - Time - of - Primary Teeth
A - Cross-Sectional - Study - of - Eruption - Time - of - Primary Teeth
A - Cross-Sectional - Study - of - Eruption - Time - of - Primary Teeth
13492
Original Article
deviations were calculated for all variables. Student’s t-test and paired Kariya P Verma N Singh K Indira MD Present
t-test were used to assess the statistical significance of differences in et al., [13] et al., [17] et al., [15] et al., [16] study
the mean ages of tooth eruption between the gender, and between the Tooth North India South India
upper and lower arches respectively at 5% probability level (p<0.05). Maxilla (months)
Central
RESULTS incisor
9.74 12.8 9.48 11.1 12.21
The present study examined 954 Indian children of which 452 (47.4%) Lateral
11.57 14.3 10.20 13.19 13.72
were boys and 502 (52.6%) were girls. Since there were no significant incisor
differences in the mean age of eruption of the teeth on the right and Canine 18.57 22.8 19.20 19.13 21.67
left sides for both the maxilla and mandible, an average of the mean First
eruption age of each pair of teeth in both the arches was calculated 14.71 18.6 15.7 16.15 17.67
molar
for males and females, as has been done in most previous studies on Second
27.80 30.1 27.7 29.18 28.98
the emergence ages of the teeth [9,10]. The results obtained for mean molar
eruption time of primary teeth including Standard Deviation (SD) and Mandible (months)
Standard Error of Mean (SEM) has been presented in [Table/Fig-1]. Central
The mandibular central incisors were the first teeth to erupt with an 8.30 11.4 8.28 10.21 10.28
incisor
overall mean eruption time of 10.3±0.6 months (Mean±SD). The mean Lateral
14.05 14.8 10.20 15.73 13.14
age of eruption was 10.2±0.79 months and 10.4±0.38 months in incisor
boys and girls respectively. Canine 20.55 23.3 19.32 21.24 22.12
First
Boys Girls 16.21 19.03 15.12 17.10 18.86
molar
Mean SD SEM Mean SD SEM
Second
Tooth (months) (months) (months) (months) (months) (months) 26.78 29.8 27.7 28.51 27.37
molar
51,61 12.07 0.74 0.10 12.34 0.89 0.11 [Table/Fig-2]: Comparison of mean ages (in months) of eruption of primary teeth
52,62 13.42 0.98 0.13 14.02 0.63 0.10 in both the arches combined by gender and sides (Right/Left) in Indian population.
53,63 21.52 1.15 0.18 21.81 0.59 0.08 Genetic, racial and environmental differences may vary considerably
54,64 18.19 0.88 0.13 17.14 1.11 0.17 between Indian and other population groups. Studies conducted on
55,65 29.12 0.89 0.12 28.83 0.73 0.10 populations of other global ethnic groups in Nepal, Saudi Arabia, and
71,81 10.19 0.79 0.098 10.37 0.38 0.05 Egypt were cross-sectional and used comparable criteria for tooth
emergence [Table/Fig-3]. The present study demonstrated delayed
72,82 13.27 0.85 0.13 13.00 0.76 0.12
eruption times of the first primary tooth in south Indian children when
73,83 22.02 1.20 0.19 22.37 0.75 0.11
compared to the data from other studies [9-12]. Although Nepal is
74,84 19.23 0.81 0.13 18.49 0.47 0.07 geographically located adjacent to India, slight differences in the
75,85 27.59 1.43 0.25 27.14 0.79 0.11 eruption times in both the genders were noted when compared
[Table/Fig-1]: Mean, SD and SEM in months, of eruption for primary teeth in boys to those of Indian counterparts [11]. Whilst these findings might
and girls. suggest possible role of genetics and/or ethnicity in the emergence
SD: Standard deviation; SEM: Standard error of mean
of primary teeth, the evidence in the literature regarding the role
Comparison of gender showed a tendency towards earlier eruption of ethnicity is unclear. Numerous studies conducted on different
in boys for all teeth except that the mandibular lateral incisors and population groups have shown a strong influence of genetics on the
first and second primary molars in both the arches erupted earlier in timing and sequence of eruption of teeth [12,19,20]. The sequence
of eruption of primary teeth was consistent with the findings in the
girls. However, statistically significant difference were noted in girls
literature and followed the typical trend in both boys and girls, i.e.,
only for the first primary molar in both maxilla and mandible (p<0.05).
central incisors, lateral incisors, first molar, and canine followed by
Further, earlier eruption of the maxillary lateral incisor in boys was
the second molar [10,13,16,17].
significant compared to that in girls (p<0.05). When the maxillary and
mandibular arches were compared, there was a tendency for central Saudi Arabia India (Present
[12] Egypt [10] Nepal [11] study)
incisors, lateral incisors, and second molars to be chronologically
advanced in the mandible as compared to the maxillary counterparts, Arch Tooth Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
while canines and first molars emerged earlier in the maxilla, in both Central
11.19 11.20 9.8 9.9 12.67 10.33 12.1 12.3
incisor
boys and girls. The sequence of eruption of teeth was identical in
both the genders and was in the following order of eruption: central Lateral
13.09 13.31 12.0 13.2 14.00 11.50 13.4 14.0
incisor
incisors, lateral incisors, first molar, canine and second molar.
Maxilla Canine 21.14 21.03 19.4 19.9 19.10 18.80 21.5 21.8
DISCUSSION First
molar
16.88 16.90 17.1 17.0 15.86 14.71 18.2 17.1
Wide variations in the emergence time of primary teeth among
Second
different population groups have been reported in the literature. The molar
28.16 28.25 25.4 28.0 26.67 25.00 29.1 28.8
children [Table/Fig-2]. These differences might be partly due to [Table/Fig-3]: Comparison of mean difference ages (in months) of eruption of
variations in the study design and sampling techniques. primary teeth in both the arches combined by sides (Right/Left) in global population.
PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS:
1. Faculty of Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry, King Faisal University AlHassa, Saudi Arabia.
2. Faculty of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, KIMS Dental College and Hospital, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS: [Jain H et al.] Etymology: Author Origin
Gunashekhar Madiraju, • Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 20, 2019
C/o Chinmayee Dental Care and Orthodontic Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. • Manual Googling: Jan 02, 2019
E-mail: indshe117@gmail.com • iThenticate Software: Jan 20, 2020 (19%)
Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None Date of Submission: Nov 19, 2019
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes Date of Peer Review: Dec 10, 2019
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes (from parents) Date of Acceptance: Jan 09, 2020
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2020