All Paradigms-Geographical-Thought.....
All Paradigms-Geographical-Thought.....
All Paradigms-Geographical-Thought.....
PARADIGMS IN GEOGRAPHY
INTRODUCTION: -
The term ‘Paradigm’ was first used by the US science theorist and historian
Thomas Kuhn in his book “The Structure of Scientific Revolution”. His book
"The Structure of scientific revolutions" (1962) presented the idea that
science undergoes Periodic Revolutions which he calls "Paradigm shifts".
In the second edition of his book, Kuhn (1970a) argued that the most basic
function of a paradigm is as an exemplar: a concrete problem solution within
a discipline that serves as a model for successive scientists. Generally, such
exemplars tie a scientific theory together, serving as an example of a
successful and striking application. Paradigms (in the sense of ‘exemplars’)
will guide research as they are presented to students as models the students
should try to copy.
Bird (1977) has argued that Kuhn has been the most influential scientific
methodologist as far as geography is concerned. Mair (1986) suggests that
geographers influenced by Kuhn fall into two groups. First there are those
who have used Kuhn to legitimize their propaganda for a ‘paradigm change’
within the discipline and as a weapon against the scientific ‘establishment’.
Second, several geographical historiographers have tried to apply a Kuhnian
model to the development of geographical thought. The paradigm concept
has taken on a life of its own beyond that originally envisaged by Kuhn, and
as such has been regarded as a useful ‘exemplar’ (model or teaching
framework) for histories of geography. To explain the process of
development of Science Kuhn prepared a model called "Paradigm of
science".
PARADIGMS IN GEOGRAPHY: -
It was largely from the Darwinian tradition that Fredrich Ratzel led the
subject into the first phase of professionalism, and then the ‘deterministic
school’ founded by him represented the first paradigm phase in geography.
Ellsworth Huntington tried to explain the styles of life of human groups and
nations in the light of their weather and climatic conditions. In his book
‘Civilisation and Climate’, he asserted that civilization could develop only in
regions of stimulating weather.
Vidal de La Blache and his followers laid stress on possibilism and declared
that man is not a passive agent ruled by the forces of nature which play their
role and determine man’s destiny and shape human society.
Second quarter of the 20th century was devoted to research in human and
regional geography. In Geography occurred a sociological trend put forward
by writings of Vidal De la Blache, Lucien Febvre and Jean Brunhes in France
and Isaiah Bowman and H.H Barrows in United States.
Vidal de la Blache asserted “Nature sets limits and offer possibilities for
human settlement, but the way man reacts or adjusts to theses conditions
depends on his own traditional way of life’. He meant to say that the physical
environment provides a range of possibilities which man turned to his use
according to his needs, wishes and capacities, in creating his habitat. Blache
emphasized the concept of a way of living (genre de vie) in supporting the
philosophy of possibilism. The ‘genre de vie’ refers to the inherited traits
that members of a human community learn- what may be called a culture.
This approach has been criticized on several accounts. For example, despite
numerous possibilities, man has not been able to get rid of the obstacles set
by the physical forces. The possibilities may be many in temperate regions
but limited in the desert, equatorial, tundra and high mountainous region.
as the subject matter of geography would give the field a logical definition.
He also insisted that geographers should consider and emphasize the form
and spatial structure created by visible phenomena on the surface of the
earth as their unifying theme.
The main focus of the paradigm was on areal differentiation, on the very
character of the earth’s surface especially of the inhabited parts.
The regional paradigm flourished in France, Great Britain and the United
States. Richard Hartshorne’s name is associated with the regional paradigm.
Schaefer, with his spatial organization paradigm initiated what may be called
the quantitative and theoretical revolution in geography. His paper
“Exceptionalism in Geography” became a rallying point for the large crop of
young geographers who were feeling greatly dissatisfied with the ’sterile’
regional paradigm of geography as chorology. He put forward a strong case
for geography to adopt the philosophy and methodology of scientific
positivism. He claimed that in geography the major regularities refer to
spatial patterns and hence, geography should be conceived as the science
concerned with the formulation of laws governing the spatial distribution of
certain features on the surface of earth. He regarded identification of laws
about patterns of spatial relationship as the raison d’etre if geography.
The Behavioural approach has been adopted since the time of Immanuel
Kant. In 1947, Wright put emphasis on Behavioural approach for the
interpretation of man-nature interaction. Kirk supplied one of the first
Behavioural models. In his model, he asserted that in space and time the
same information would have different meaning for people of different
socio-economic, cultural and ethnic backgrounds living in a similar
geographical environment. Each individual of a society reacts differently to a
piece of information about the resource, space and environment.