PLJ 2021 Lahore 386: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

386 Lah. M. RIAZ MALIK V. LEARNED ADDL.

SESSIONS JUDGE PLJ


(Muhammad Qasim Khan, J.)
6. In view of above, these writ petitions are dismissed being not
maintainable. However, the petitioners, if so desire, may avail remedy as
provided under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
(Y.A.) Petition dismissed.
-------------------------
PLJ 2021 Lahore 386
Present: MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, J.
MUHAMMAD RIAZ MALIK--Petitioner
versus
LEARNED ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
and 7 others--Respondents
W.P. No. 21890 of 2014, decided on 2.5.2016.
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973--
----Art. 199--Criminal Procedure Code, (V of 1898), S. 22-A(6)--Application for
registration of case--Dismissed--Execution of agreement--Producing of
forged lady--Cognizable offence--Civil litigation--Direction to--From a bare
reading of application filed by petitioner before learned Ex Officio Justice of
Peace, prima facie, commission of a cognizable of fence is made out--Mere
pendency of civil litigation or availability of remedy before Civil Court
cannot create any bar to launch criminal proceedings--Civil and criminal
liabilities are entirely independent in nature and have no nexus with each
other; hence, both she proceedings can go; side by side--Petition was
allowed. [P. 387] A
PLD 1992 Lahore 178 ref.
Mr. Abdul Khaliq Safrani, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. Amjad Ali Chatha, Additional Advocate General for Respondent.
Mr. Zabi Ullah Nagra, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Ex-parte to the extent of remaining Respondents vide order dated 14-
03-2016.
Date of hearing: 2.5.2016.
ORDER
Petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 16-07-2014 passed by
learned Ex Officio Justice of Peace, whereby application under Section 22-A(6),
Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner seeking direction for registration of case against
the proposed accused was dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that from the contents of
application commission of cognizable offence is made out, as at the time of
execution of the alleged agreement Shahida Ghalib was not in Pakistan and the
respondents by producing a forged lady got executed the said agreement, which
2021 M. RIAZ MALIK V. LEARNED ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE Lah. 387
(Muhammad Qasim Khan, J.)
needs investigation; civil and criminal litigation can go side by side; and while
passing impugned order learned Ex-Officio Justice of Peace has not properly
appreciated the material available before him; hence, impugned order is liable to
be set aside and while accepting instant petition direction for registration of case
against the private respondents may be issued.
2. On the other hand, learned Law Officer, while supporting the
impugned order has vehemently opposed this petition.
3. Arguments decided and record perused.
4. From the perusal of application filed by the petitioner before learned
Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, it appears that serious allegations have been
levelled against the private respondents, as stance of the petitioner is that at the
time of alleged execution of the agreement Shahida Ghalib, who was residing at
Libya, was not present in Pakistan and the alleged agreement was prepared
through bogus signatures and thumb impressions of Shahida Ghalib, which
needs thorough investigation.
5. From a bare reading of application filed by the petitioner before
learned Ex Officio Justice of Peace, prima facie, commission of a cognizable
offence is made out. Mere pendency of civil litigation or availability of remedy
before the Civil Court cannot create any bar to launch criminal proceedings.
Civil and criminal liabilities are entirely independent in nature and have no
nexus with each other; hence, both the proceedings can go side by side.
Therefore, in the light of judgment passed by the Full Bench of this Court,
reported as (PLD 1992 Lahore 178) Muhammad Shafi versus Deputy
Superintendent of Police (Malik Gul Nawaz) and 5 others", this petition is
accepted with direction
that after registration of case Investigating Officer shall firstly verify the fact
that on the date of execution of alleged agreement Shahida Ghalib was in
Pakistan and then he shall investigate the matter on the other aspects of the case.
However, during investigation, to the
extent of the persons who are found innocent, the Investigating Officer will
submit report for cancellation of case forthwith and he will proceed against the
persons who are found guilty in accordance with law.
(Y.A.) Petition allowed.
----------------------
388 Lah. Mst. SULLI V. SHERA PLJ
(Ch. Muhammad Iqbal, J.)

You might also like