Econometrics Means "Economic Measurement." Although Measurement Is An Important Part of
Econometrics Means "Economic Measurement." Although Measurement Is An Important Part of
Econometrics Means "Economic Measurement." Although Measurement Is An Important Part of
METHODOLOGY OF ECONOMETRICS
How do econometricians proceed in their analysis of an economic problem? That is, what is their
methodology? Although there are several schools of thought on econometric methodology, we
present here the traditional or classical methodology, which still dominates empirical research
in economics and other social and behavioral sciences. Broadly speaking, traditional econometric
methodology proceeds along the following lines:
1. Statement of theory or hypothesis.
2. Specification of the mathematical model of the theory
3. Specification of the statistical, or econometric, model
4. Obtaining the data
5. Estimation of the parameters of the econometric model
6. Hypothesis testing
7. Forecasting or prediction
8. Using the model for control or policy purposes.
i. Vagueness of theory
ii. Unavailability of data
iii. Core variables versus peripheral variables:
iv. Intrinsic randomness in human behavior
v. Poor proxy variables
vi. Principle of parsimony
vii. Wrong functional form
Note that an estimator, also known as a (sample) statistic, is simply a rule or formula or method
that tells how to estimate the population parameter from the information provided by the sample
at hand. A particular numerical value obtained by the estimator in an application is known as an
estimate.
the PRF based on the SRF is at best an approximate one. This approximation is shown
diagrammatically in Figure below
For X = Xi , we have one (sample) observation Y = Yi . In terms of the SRF, the observed Yi can
be expressed as
Now obviously in Figure Yˆi overestimates the true E(Y | Xi) for the Xi shown therein. By the
same token, for any Xi to the left of the point A, the SRF will underestimate the true PRF. But we
readily see that such over- and underestimation is inevitable because of sampling fluctuations.
The critical question now is: Granted that the SRF is but an approximation of the PRF, can we
devise a rule or a method that will make this approximation as “close” as possible? In other
words, how should the SRF be constructed so that βˆ1 is as “close” as possible to the true β 1 and
βˆ2 is as “close” as possible to the true β2 even though we will never know the true β1 and β2?