11 Distribution System Load Characteristics (1172)
11 Distribution System Load Characteristics (1172)
11 Distribution System Load Characteristics (1172)
UD
interval, kilowatt demand meter is in- '4.
z
stalled at each residence. Graphic in-
tegrating meters with 15-minute interval
strip charts are installed at the master- Flg. 1. ResidentIal load survey plot plan
meter location on the primary circuit to
measure kilowatts and reactive kilovolt-
amperes for the entire group. These
tests run for a 12-month period. In addi- dential air conditioning. The annual kw- Figs. 4 and 5. The test-group coincidence
tion to daily load curves, an analysis of hr versus demand relationship will not factors, shown in the figures, are the ratio
-these data furnishes the following: provide reliable estimating results where of the maximum diversified demand of the
1. Correlation between the kilowatt-hour there is a mixture of air-conditioning and group during the 4-month peak period, to
(kw-hr) usage of an individual consumer nonair-conditioning customers and where the sum of the maximum noncoincident
and his peak demand. the yearly peak ordinarily occurs during demands, for each customer, during the
2. Coincidence factor relationship. the winter. The inaccuracy of the esti- same peak period. These curves are
3. Loss and power-factor data. mate is due primarily to the inclusion of similar to those published by others.1.2.3
4. Load factor information. the air-conditioning kilowatt-hour usage The coincidence relationship between
in the annual consumption figures. various test groups is obtained by com-
The derivation and significance of the Estimates of winter peak demands for paring the peak demand period graphic
above factors and relationships is dis- customers with large air-conditioning chart readings of the test group master-
cussed in the following paragraphs. usage, based on this relationship, will be meters.4
CORRELATION BETWEEN Kw-HR AND higher than actual demand, since the air- Surveys utilizing a single group size,
conditioning usage contributes greatly to while desirable for some purposes, do not
DEMAND
the annual kw-hr consumption and adds furnish intragroup coincidence-factor in-
This relationship has been established nothing to the winter peak demand. formation. However, the kw-hr versus
for the yearly peak demand versus annual The least-squares lines of best fit for the demand relationships discussed prev-
kw-hr usage, winter peak demand versus summer and winter peak-period relation- iously, can be derived. An example of
winter kw-hr usage, and summer peak de- ships are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. A tab- the results of such a survey, made some
mand versus summer kw-hr usage. These ulation of the pertinent statistics under- years ago, is shown in Fig. 6.
latter relationships are more significant in lying these curves is provided in Tables I
view of the increasing saturation of resi- and II. INTERCLASS COINCIDENCE FACTOR
If the test locations can, in the aggre-
Paper 57-168, recommended by the AIEE Trans- INTRACLASS COINCIDENCE FACTOR gate, be considered statistically repre-
mission and Distribution Committee and approved
by the AIEE Technical Operations Department Use of test groups of varying size pro- sentative of the residential customers as a
for presentation at the AIRE Winter General vides the data needed to evaluate intra- whole, a load curve for the entire resi-
Meeting, New York, N. Y., January 21-25, 1957.
Manuscript submitted October 25, 1956; made class coincidence. Scatter diagrams of dential class of customers can be prepared.
available for printing December 10, 1956. test-group coincidence factors for summer If this same technique is used for other
R. H. SARIKAS is with the Illinois Power Company,
Decatur, Ill., and H. B. THACKER iS With Westing-
and winter peak periods along with the classes of customers, similar load curves
house Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. hyperbolic regression lines are shown in can be prepared. When these load
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 POWER-FACTOR DATA
The power factor of the various test
4- SUMMER MONTHS CONSUMPTION - MWHR groups at time of peak load during the
winter peak period is shown in Fig. 8.
20 Fig. 2 (above). Comparable information for summer
8 Residence test peak-period is provided in Fig. 9. Use
group, kw-hr con- of these data permits an evaluation of the
U,
16 sumption versus de- effect of such loads as air conditioning and
4 mand, summer-peak the improvement possible by such means
period as series and shunt capacitors. Data rel-
-Jz- 2
ative to the power factor of loads on the
I0 secondary system also permit an intelli-
~- 8 gent decision whether or not to use sec-
6 ondary capacitors after determining a
breakeven power factor for secondary
4 versus primary capacitors.7
Fig. 3 (left). Resi-
2 dence test group, LOAD FACTOR
0 kw-hr consumption
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 versus demand, Load factor can be obtained from an
4-WINTER MONTHS CONSUMPTION - MWHR winter-peak period analysis of the daily load curves or the
load factor may also be obtained from a
comparison of demand and kw-hr readings
curves are combined, the system load Loss DATA for a comparable period. The load-
curve is obtained. Such a series of load Loss data are obtained as a by-product factor versus coincidence-factor relation-
curves along with the actual system send- of the load study. For example, in the ship is also available. This relationship,
out from dispatching records is shown in residential test group shown in Fig. 1, the which has limited application in distri-
Fig. 7. Comparison of the series pro- difference between master-meter kw-hr bution planning, is useful in developing
vides interclass coincidence relationships. readings and total sales billed represents "selective selling" programs.8
1.0 1.0
0.9 0.9
0.8 172 _ 1 1 08
0
0 0.7 A I
_ _ _I l O 07
U- 0.6 < 06
Li 0.5 a_"I%,-, ti I a 05
_ _ e- Se
0 z
z 0.4 oU 04
5 0.3 Z 03
z
0
0)
0.2 I_ - - &
0
0.2
0.1 01
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1I 20 22 24 26 28 31vJ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS
Fig. 4. Residence test group, coincidence-factor relationship, summer- Fig. 5. Residence test group, coincidence-factor relationship, winter-
peak period peak period
The accuracy of the two demand estima- 1,231 .. 1,000-1,499 kw-hr ..... 117 ...... 3.4 4.0 0.1- 7.5 ...... 1.5- 5.0
1,735 .. 1,0500-1,999 kw-hr ..... 78 ...... 4.98 5.0 1.0-12.0 ...... 4.0- 6.0
tion nomographs is shown in Fig. 12. 2,240 .. 2,000-2,499 kw-hr ..... 49 ...... 5.99 6.0 1.5-10.0 ...... 5.0- 7.0
A number of companies are using similar 2,709 .. 2,500-2,999 kw-hr ..... 31 ...... 6.3 6.0 3.2-11.0 ...... 5.3- 7.0
3,242 .. 3,000-3,499 kw-hr ..... 17 7.98 ... 7.5 4.5-12.2 ...... 6.4- 9.4
schemes to monitor the loading of distri- 3,729 .. 3,500-3,999 kw-hr ..... 10 ..... 8.3 8.4 6.0-10.8 ...... 8.0- 9.0
bution transformers.'011 At least one 4,243 .. 4,000-4,499 kw-hr ... 11 ..... 9.0 8.7 5.5-14.5 ...... 8.4- 9.7
4,977 .. 4,500-4,999 kw-hr ..... 14 ..... 9.1 . 9.5 6.0-10.9 ...... 8.0-10.0
company has mechanized the operation, 9,414 .. 5,000-above kw-hr..... 6 .14. 14.6 .13.0 8.5-25.0 ...... 9.5-13.0
o 1.2
tion of an existing transformer-secondary
combination exceeds design limits, data 30.
0.8
are available to plan an adequate rebuild. 0.8
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I1
LU~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oC
0~~~~~~
U
(D1 N0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0
_r 0 SIS0NINOSN±~ B
0~~~~~~~~~~~
0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~000
_
0
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CN0 -J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
m 0
0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0
o 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 U,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0
00
z W z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0C
Li) 0l
0~~~~~~~~~0
(1) ()g
oLU
0
o~~~~~~~~~
U
< 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00
0
Ld a: 0 CD 0 L 0 0
pD001 )jOd8 10 4U83JOd PO 18 0lOJdL
ZD 0
0 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 r-, F- c
LL w~~~~~B WU) LU
cli
wn N.1<w0G
V L
TIIlIInS (.......ID 1]:Iz
~
~~~~~~C
cIn
LU
m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0
0 (0 () 0 0 0 0 0 L
°
0 X 0 0 O 0 0
0 N 0 0 0 0 _ 0
voltage drop for each transformer sta- see Fig. 16. The underlying data are shown 10000-
in Table IV. These data were obtained by 30-
tion, depending upon its location on the 8000-
feeder. The transformer-secondary com- installing demand meters at each residence 6000-:
ldr
2
bination nearest to the substation may and at the totalizing master-meter loca- 20-
100- 5000- I
be permitted more voltage drop than a tion. A large number of test groups were 80- ler
4000- 2
transformer-secondary combination near installed without individual demand 15. 60- 0
the end of the feeder. meters to obtain further data on group 50-
3000 1U'I-0
40-
Since iMdividual transformer loads are demands and losses. Since generally 0.
most rural customers are served by indi- 30-.
known, the loads to be connected to pro- 10- I,-
0:
posed feeders can be estimated with a vidual transformers, individual customer 20-
2000- 0
high order of accuracy. This eliminates load information is very significant. A is-
0
0
2
41
lz
1°0
difficulties which might arise if more load test has been initiated to determine the 0
2
0
1500-
1
is transferred to a new feeder than was individual characteristics of a carefully 6- 2
0
10-
intended. selected sample of our rural customers. 5. 8- 1000-
2 0
This will provide data on the duty cycle 4. 2 6-.
0
2
LoAD FORECASTING of rural distribution transformers serving 5- 41 800- 2
a:
A further use of these data is in the prep- single- or multiple-customer secondaries 3-
4-
600-
2
aration of load-density maps which show and further improve our knowledge of 3-
13
It
the coincident load in each unit of area. kw-hr versus demand, and coincidence 2-
500-
This unit area is usually a square mile for relationships. The meters to be used for 2- 400-
rural areas and 1/4 of a square mile for this test are of a special design and have a
urban areas. The load-density maps meter trough that can be plugged into the I '~~ ~~-
300d
are prepared by counting the number of customers' outdoor meter socket. This
customers in each class within an area, trough will in turn accommodate the test
I 250]
using distribution maps, and assigning meter and the customers' kw-hr billing Fig. 11. Demand estimation nomograph for
these customers the average kw-hr usages meter. Such an arrangement greatly urban residential service, four wintef months
of customers in their respective area. reduces the cost of such a survey. kw-hr consumption
20_
reached its maximum coincident demand. z
w 80
z
30
40 -
2. The daily average load characteristic
0 per customer shown as a percentage of 0ir
(A
z
50_ maximum demand per customer, both Sz
5. Coincident demand per customer as a PERCENT OF DAYS HAVING LOAD GREATER THAN
Fig. 12. Accuracy of transformer load function of average monthly kw-hr usage LOAD SHOWN IN ORDINATE
estimation, kw-hr method per customer for the group.
Fig. 14. Daily load magnitude frequency oF
6. Diversity factors related to number of occurrence, group N-1, eight customers
ways. A representative list of problems customers and presented as absolute
to which load data are being applied fol- diversity versus number of customers and
lows: also in per cent of full diversity versus
number of customers. load survey data, a demand meter has
1. Load forecasting by determination of been developed that records 15-minute de-
class and system peak loads. Another company installs primary and
secondary metering to obtain: mands on a magnetic tape. The tapes
2. Determination of distribution trans- containing the 15-minute demand read-
former, primary feeder, and substation load- 1. Fifteen minute maximum kva (kilo-
ing for use in distribution system planning. ings can be fed into a machine which
volt-amperes) and cumulative kw-hr. punches the data on cards that in turn
3. Economic determination of appliance- 2. Kilowatt-hour and kilovar-hour usage
promotion policies based on effect on are fed into data-processing machines to
per hour and per day. Readings are taken
system load caused by load characteristics on primary feeders, at the distribution
obtain various desired information. This
of various appliances. transformers, and at the individual home. new demand meter will considerably
4. Development of load curves in various These data is used in obtaining the following: speed up operations in interpreting load-
portions of the system as a basis of design a. Daily load curves. survey data and may well be justified
for specific facilities. b. Determining the effect of tempera- both for load testing and for demand
5. Periodic survey of distribution trans- ture on hourly load variation of billing purposes.
former loading and development of change- appliance groups.
out schedules. c. Determining kva demand versus IMPORTANCE OF LOAD CHARACTERISTICS
6. Determination of "cost to serve" kw-hr usage of various appliance IN DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER
individual-load groups as a basis for evalu- groups. It is planned to use a program
for developing this information in DESIGN
ating current rate schedules.
which data-processing machines will Over the years, many changes have
Many different methods and procedures eliminate a major part of the manual taken place in the make-up of the distri-
are used in making load surveys and apply-
calculations.
bution transformer. The basic com-
ing the information.'0 One company has Another electrical utility uses a continu- ponents of copper, iron, insulation, and
selected customer groups of about 40 ing field check on certain selected trans- oil have been improved by new process
customers having some common electric- formers to keep statistical data up to date techniques. New materials, tanks, finish
load characteristic such as an average for use on their entire system. Recording appearance, and protection have all been
peak-month kilowatt-hour usage between a eters and voltmeters are in contin- points of design improvement. How-
100 and 150 kw-hr. Individual graphic uous service, measuring the loads on this ever, since the introduction of grain-
recording meters are installed on each sample group of transformers, and sta- oriented steel, there has been very little
customer's service to record 1/2-hour tistical data are thus kept up to date by change in the basic operating character-
kilowatt demands for a 16-day period. periodically correcting according to data istics of the distribution transformer.
From these demand data and from kw-hr obtained from the sample group. This is rather surprising in view of the
usage obtained either by test data or from As a means of simplifying and reducing significant changes in system loads and
meter books, the following is developed: the cost of tabulating and interpreting operating practices which have occurred
100
x
4 90
X 80
i : f ilA!gflunl.1
1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~11~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
4
P
Z 70
z
c 60
0
50
3 40
a. 30
Z 20
o 10
0
JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC. Fig. 13. Daily maximum loads, group
MONTH AND DAY N-1, eight customer
570 Sarikas, Thacker-Distribution System Load Characteristics AUGUST 1 957
YEAR 1954 - 55 Fig. 15. Com-
mercial test
CHAMPAIGN CHAMPAIGN groups, daily
SUMMER PEAK-WEEK WINTER PEAK - DAY load curves
10 o 0T
° 80 60 1 T1
a-
- so
'20 i F- N *20
12 2 6 T( 2 4 12 2 4 6 18 10 12 2 4 6 6 10 12 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2- 4 6 8 10 12
AM PM AM PM
a-
DANVILLE DANVILLE
o° mf
SUMMER PEAK- DAY SUMMER PEAK-WEEK
100
0.
0 60
° 60
° 40 20
20
u 100 40
2 4 6 P M0 12 2 4 6 6
A2 12 12 2 4 6 6 10 12 2 4 6 8 1o 12
60
AM PM AM PM
f-J
--I
DANVILLE DANVILLE
I
KEWANEE
WINTER PEAK- DAY WINTER PEAK -WEEK SUMMER PEAK - DAY
100 0. I0 1 I I/
00 1I
0
-J
so , soC 0 0
a
eol-ll r rvrI 1 T1
I 1 n
so
1 11
0
4o80
40
-r-l °l I- I III---l- -
I
°ITTIA- 1
I t
S 0
+i40- a-
0.
,,20 1 201 1 I I--
0
12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 6 10 12 12 2 4 6 6 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 i2 2 4 6 8 i0 12 2 4 6 8 IC
AM PM AM PM AM PM
I
KEWANEE
SUMMER PEAK -WEEK 11 T of 6
0.
a 4-
20
-11111AM
m
1P
0L2 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 Le J.,I
i i
AMl pM
Table 111. Urban Commercial Electric Service. Identity and Characteristics of Test Groups of Customers
Maximum 15-Minute
Demand for Group Annual-Load Factor Kw-Hr Per Kw of Demand Intraclass Coincidence Factor
No. of Summer Winter Kw-Hr Used Kw-Hr Summer Winter Summer Winter
Group Customers in Peak Peak in Year by Per Kw of Peak Peak Peak Peak
Location Test Group Period Period Test Group Demand Per cent Period Period Annual Period Period
Kewanee ...... 72 . 297 . 233 . 839,362 2,859 .. 32.6 1,175 ....... 1,006 ... 0.76 .... 0.81 . 0.68
Champaign .. 74 .. 6 i 23 .. 2,195,350 2,535....... 28.9
1,0. 996 ... 0.82 .. 0.87.. 0.76
Danville ..... 154 . . 724 574 2,110,427 1,122
2,917 .... 33.3...
1,089.. 0.67 . 0.73 0.66
Granite City. 74 . .477 . 297 1,468,179 3,081 .... 35.2
1,008 . 1,016 . 0.72 O.. 0 .. . 0.66
Mt. Vernon.. 60 402 306 1,212,050 3,020 .... 34.5....5
1,193 .. .... 1,180 0.63.7... , 72
Average ..... 87 . . .2,882..... 32.9..9 1,058.. 1,102 ... 0.72 . .78 . 0.69
Note: Summer-peak period includes the months of June-Sept. Winter-peak period includes the months of Nov.-Feb.
15-Minute Demands in Kw
6 1 No. of Range of Tests for
Average Measure- Range of Middle Half of Cases
54 Kw-Hr Range of Annual Use ments Average Median All Tests Ranked by Demands
-z
4-4
> < 793 . Under 1,000 kw-hr . .....4....... 1.4 . 1.6 . 0.2-2.1 ..... 1.5-1 7
a 1244 . 1,000-1,499 kw-hr ...... 12. 1.9 . 1.8 . 0.3-3.9 ..... 1.3-2.5
1908 ...... 1,500-2,499 kw-hr ...... 5 ...... 2.8 .......2.4....... 1.4-3.4 ........ 2.0-2.9
3296. 2,500-4,499kw-hr ...... 14 4.2 . 4.3 . 1.5-7.2 ..... 2 8-5 2
5297 . 4,500-5,999 kw-hr . .....9 5.8 . 5.7 . 4.2-8.1 ..... 4.5-6 6
6720 . 6,000-7,999 kw-hr . .....8....... 6.1 . 6.4 . 3.4-8.1 ..... 5.4-7 1
0- - 9649 . 8,000 kw-hr and over.... 6 . 7.2 . 7.1 . 5.4-9.5..... 6.4-7.7
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CONSUMPTION IN MWHR
Fig. 16. Rural test group, annual kw-hr made along these lines at probable in- 3. SYNTHETIC OR EQUIVALENT LOAD CURVBS.
R. F. Hamilton. AIEE Transactions, vol. 61,
consumption versus demand creases in manufacturing costs. Justifica- 1942, pp. 369-81.
tion for such changes in the light of in- 4. TEE SUMMATION OP LOAD CURVES, R. P.
creased costs must be based on studies of Hamilton. Ibid., vol. 63, Oct. 1944, pp. 729-35.
in recent years. Load growth on the 5. Table III of discussion by Robert H. Sarikas
distribution system has resulted in greater economical transformer loading, recogniz- of WHAT Do LOSSES COST IN HYDRO, TEBRMAL,
load densities, and the advent of new ing the added cost of increased losses and AND COMBINED SYSTEMS, V. W. Ruskin. Ibid.,
vol. 75, pt. III, June 1956, p. 336.
loads such as air conditioning and the tele- greater voltage regulation resulting from
6. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING
vision set have resulted in a demand for heavier transformer loading. This could (book), H. P. Seelye. McGraw-Hill Book Com-
better voltage regulation. Such load be done, were sufficient information pany, Inc., New York, N. Y., first edition, 1930,
chap. 33.
growth has also been accompanied gen- available, by developing the relationship 7. ECONOMIC MBRITS OP SECONDARY CAPACITORS,
between the annual costs of the various R. A. Zimmerman. AIEE Transactions, vol. 72,
erally by lower power factors and by factors involved in the application of dis- pt. III, Aug. 1953, pp. 694-97.
significant changes in the daily and tribution transformers and the average 8. LOAD RESEARCH, AS A GUIDE TO SELECTIVB
seasonal load curves. Perhaps the main SELLING, G. M. Turner. Electric Light and Power,
reason for there being little basic change load over the expected life of a trans- Chicago, Ill., May 1952.
in the operation characteristics of the former. Development of such relation- 9. DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMER LOAD SURVEY
ships, based on reliable information as to AND TRANSFORMER-SECONDARY DESIGN, H. E.
distribution transformer, has been the Carpenter. Missouri Valley Electric Associatiox
difficulty of obtaining load-characteristic load factor, cost of losses, cost of voltage Engineering Conference, Kansas City, Mo., Mar.
1955. (Available from the author.)
information which is sufficiently represen- regulation, etc., provides a sound basis 10. MBTER BooKc GIVES TRANSFORmER LOAD,
tative for the entire electrical utility in- for determining economical transformer L. J. Weed. Electrical World, New York, N. Y.,
dustry to serve as the basis for evaluating loading, and evaluating the desirability Sept. 6, 1954.
the over-all economics of transformer de- of further changes in transformer design. 11. LOAD CRECK TEAT SMALL TRANsFORMER,
M. J. Urner. The Line, Sept. 1955.
sign changes. For this reason, load- 12. COMPUTERS GAUGE TRANSFORMER LOAD,
survey work such as described in this Conclusion H. E. Stratton, R. H. Joerden, B. M. Gal}aher.
Electrical World, New York, N. Y., Mar. 21. 1955.
paper is highly desirable. The work being done in the electrical 13. ECONOMIC LOADING OP DISTRIBUTION TRANS-
A significant change in the load char- utility industry to obtain a more com- PORMERS, C. F. Mitchell. Proceedings, American
Power Conference, Chicago, 11., Mar. 1956.
acteristics of many areas of the United plete and realistic knowledge of load 14. LOAD CHARACTBRISTICS OP "SMALL LIGHT
States, having an important bearing on characteristics is producing valuable re- AND POWER" CUSToMERS-THEIR E CONOMIC SIG-
distribution transformer design and oper- sults. A knowledge of the character- NIPICANCB, Constantine Bary. Electric Light and
Power, Chicago, III., Oct. 1955.
ating practice, has been the trend towards istics of individual and group loads of 15. MANUAL OF PROCBDURE FOR LOAD SURVEYS,
a summer-peak demand which approaches different classes and how they combine Load Research Committee. Association of Edison
or exceeds the winter peak. These Illuminating Companies, New York, N. Y.,
in various parts of the system is essential Feb. 1951.
summer peaks, brought about mainly by to efficient, economical system design.
a growing use of residential air condition- Many other benefits can accrue from a
ing, occur at a time when ambient tem- greater familiarity with load character-
peratures and their effect on distribution istics. Not the least of these are possible
transformer loading are at an extreme.
Such loads also appear to have resulted in
changes in apparatus design to provide
greater operating economy to the utility.
Discussion
a higher-load factor with attendant re- Because of the importance of such informa-
duction in the ability of the transformer A. H. Kidder (Philadelphia Electric Com-
tion to the industry, it is the authors' pany, Philadelphia, Pa.): This discussion
to carry short-duration loads. Reduction opinion that load surveys and the free was prompted by my inference for Mr.
in allowable transformer loading is exchange of resulting data should be Sarikas' paper that he proposed to use a
certainly not to be desired from the stand- strongly encouraged by both utilities and curve similar to Fig. 6 with one similar
point of obtaining the most use from the to Fig. 4 as a moderately reliable basis for
manufacturers. estimating the maximum load on any given
investment in distribution transformer distribution transformer installation. My
capacity. Recognizing this, an improved References experience has taught me that the vagaries
insulation system and more efficient cool- of customers' meter-reading schedules, the
ing has been incorporated in recent trans- 1. COINCIDENCE-FACTOR RBLATIONsHIPS OF ELHC- dissimilarity between the loads of appar-
former designs, which has resulted in sub- TtIC-SERVICB-LOAD CHARACTR.1STICS, Constantine ently identical residences, etc., make kw-hr
Bary. AIEE Transactions, vol. 64, Sept. 1945, sales an unreliable substitute for distribu-
stantial improvement in life expectancy pp. 623-29.
tion-transformer load testing; although the
and has allowed a greater margin of 6ver- 2. EVALUATION OP INCOMPLBTELY DIVEERS'IED information illustrated by the authors
LOADS, W. L. Tadlock. Electrical Engineering,
load capability. Other changes could be vol. 62, Nov. 1943, pp. 485-92. does provide a practical basis for estimating