3-1 Scenario Analysis: Project Risk Analysis-Comprehensive
3-1 Scenario Analysis: Project Risk Analysis-Comprehensive
3-1 Scenario Analysis: Project Risk Analysis-Comprehensive
Family security is considering the introduction of a child security product consisting of tiny
Global Positioning System (GPS) trackers that can be inserted in the sole of a child’s shoe. The
trackers allow parents to track the child if he or she were ever lost or abducted. The estimates,
plus or minus 10%, associated with this new product are as follows: Unit price: $125, Variable
costs per unit: $75, Fixed costs: $250,000 per year, Expected sales: 10,000 units per year.
Because this is a new product line, the firm’s analysts are not confident in their estimates and
would like to know how well the investment would fare if the estimates on the items listed above
are 10% higher or 10% lower than expected. Assume that this new product line will require an
initial outlay of $1 million, with no working capital investment, and will last for ten years, being
depreciated down to zero using straight-line depreciation. In addition, the firm’s management
uses a discount rate of 10% and a 34% tax rate in its project analyses.
a. Calculate the project’s NPV under each of the following sets of assumptions:
(1) the best-case scenario (use the high estimates—unit price 10% above expected, variable costs
10% less than expected, fixed costs 10% less than expected, and unit sales 10% higher than
expected),
(2) the base case using expected values, and
(3) the worst case scenario.
b. Given your estimates of the range of NPVs for the investment, what is your assessment of the
investment’s potential?
b. What level of annual unit sales does it take for the investment to achieve a zero NPV?
Use your spreadsheet model to answer this question. (Hint: Use the Goal Seek function in
Excel.)
c. If unit sales were 15% higher than the base case, what unit price would it take for the
investment to achieve a zero NPV?
2-11 PROJECT VALUATION HMG Corporation is considering the manufacture of a new
chemical compound that is used to make high-pressure plastic containers. An investment of $4
million in plant and equipment is required. The firm estimates that the investment will have a
five-year life, and will use straight-line depreciation toward a zero salvage value. However, the
investment has an anticipated salvage value equal to 10% of its original cost. The number of
pounds (in millions) of the chemical compound that HMG expects to sell over the five-year life
of the project are as follows: 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 2.0. To operate the new plant, HMG estimates
that it will incur additional fixed cash operating expenses of $1 million per year and variable
operating expenses equal to 45% of revenues. HMG also estimates that in year t it will need to
invest 10% of the anticipated increase in revenues for year t + 1 in net working capital. The price
per pound for the new compound is expected to be $2.00 in years 1 and 2, then $2.50 per pound
in years 3 through 5. HMG’s tax rate is 38%, and it requires a 15% rate of return on its new-
product investments.
a. Exhibit P2-11.1 contains projected cash flows for the entire life of the proposed investment.
Note that investment cash flow is derived from the additional revenues and costs associated with
the proposed investment. Verify the calculation of project cash flow for year 5.
b. Does this project create shareholder value? How much? Should HMG undertake the
investment? Explain your answer.
c. What if the estimate of the variable costs were to rise to 55%? Would this affect your
decision?
c/ Calculate the critical change ( %) of some following variables: Price per unit, market share,
market size (Year 1), Growth rate in market size beginning in Year 2, Unit variable cost, fixed
cost, tax rate, cost of capital, Investment in NWC.
Variables Estimated value Critical Critical % change
value( breakeven
value)