The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing existing research relevant to the research topic and identifying how the research may help answer questions or gaps. A literature review situates the research within the academic field, provides a critical review of literature, and identifies gaps the research aims to address. It is important for having up-to-date knowledge, ensuring research relevance, and understanding background research. The literature review process involves initial scoping, ongoing review as research is conducted, and relating findings to existing literature. When writing, the review should be framed by research questions, relate to the study, and critically engage with literature through synthesis rather than summary.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing existing research relevant to the research topic and identifying how the research may help answer questions or gaps. A literature review situates the research within the academic field, provides a critical review of literature, and identifies gaps the research aims to address. It is important for having up-to-date knowledge, ensuring research relevance, and understanding background research. The literature review process involves initial scoping, ongoing review as research is conducted, and relating findings to existing literature. When writing, the review should be framed by research questions, relate to the study, and critically engage with literature through synthesis rather than summary.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing existing research relevant to the research topic and identifying how the research may help answer questions or gaps. A literature review situates the research within the academic field, provides a critical review of literature, and identifies gaps the research aims to address. It is important for having up-to-date knowledge, ensuring research relevance, and understanding background research. The literature review process involves initial scoping, ongoing review as research is conducted, and relating findings to existing literature. When writing, the review should be framed by research questions, relate to the study, and critically engage with literature through synthesis rather than summary.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing existing research relevant to the research topic and identifying how the research may help answer questions or gaps. A literature review situates the research within the academic field, provides a critical review of literature, and identifies gaps the research aims to address. It is important for having up-to-date knowledge, ensuring research relevance, and understanding background research. The literature review process involves initial scoping, ongoing review as research is conducted, and relating findings to existing literature. When writing, the review should be framed by research questions, relate to the study, and critically engage with literature through synthesis rather than summary.
relevant to your topic, showing how it relates to your investigation. It explains and justifies how your investigation may help answer some of the questions or gaps in this area Of research. LITERATURE REVIEW
situates your research focus within the
context of the wider academic community in your field; reports your critical review of the relevant literature; and identifies a gap within that literature that your research will attempt to address. WHY LITERATURE REVIEW?
To have up-to-date awareness of the
relevant work of others To make sure the relevance of your research question To ‘address a gap’ WHY LITERATURE REVIEW?
To understand and critically analyse the
background research To select and source the information that is necessary to develop a context for your research LR PROCESS DURING
PRIOR AT THE END
PRIOR
An early view to establish the
context and rationale for your study and to confirm your choice of research focus/question DURING
Make sure that you keep in touch
with current, relevant research in your field, which is published during the period of your research WHEN YOU READ, THINK ABOUT: What were the research aims of the paper/book? Is the research aim achieved? If so, how did they do it? Are there any problems with their methodology? Was it a strong or a weak research model? How will this research help with your own research? What can you take from it? What needs to be avoided? What are you doing differently? AT THE END
Relate your findings to the findings of
others, and to identify their implications for theory, practice, and research. Ways of finding relevant material
Electronic References of Hand searching of
sources references journals THINK ABOUT YOUR OWN LITERATURE
Who are the key players in my field?
What are the main ideas/debates in my field? How have these ideas changed over time? What are some of the problems with these ideas/debates? Is there a problem with the methodology? What are you going to do differently? First stage of the literature review is to identify the key people in your field
What research and theory is there on my topic?
What are the key sources (books, articles) on my topic? Who are the main theorists and researchers in this area? How has the topic/problem been investigated over time? Identify a ‘gap’ in the literature
What are the strengths and weaknesses of these
debates? What evidence is lacking, inconclusive or limited? What will you add to the topic? What will you do differently? WRITING IT UP
It should be framed by your research questions.
It must relate to your study Be in control, not totally deferent to or ‘tossed about by previous literature'. Be selective. Ask ‘why am I including this?’ Engage in a dialogue with the literature, you are not just providing a summary WRITING IT UP
should be summarized, synthesized and critically
written you need to digest information from different sources , critically ecvaluate it and present your conclusion in a concise, logicalland 'reader-friendly' manner SYNTHESIS WRITING
ARTICLE 1 ARTICLE 2 ARTICLE 3
what does this all mean?
CRITICAL INTEGRATION AND SYNTHESIS
Synthesis - the combination of components to form a new connected whole LITERATURE REVIEW CRITICAL ENQUIRY
academic research is about critial enquiry therefore,it
is_important_that_you_critically_evaluate_the_mater ial. do you agree with the conclusions? if not, why? you need to digest information from different sources , critically ecvaluate it and present your conclusion in a concise, logicalland 'reader-friendly' manner COMPILING LITERATURE
find appropriate literature on a specific topic
manage the information present a logical, synthesized, and reader-friendly review of the current knowledge relating to a specific topic FINDING LITERATURE
Use the library database - eJournal Portal
Google Scholar Academia ResearchGate Snow ball from the list of references in an article E-JOURNAL PORTAL I-QUEST I-QUEST GOOGLE SCHOLAR ACADEMIA RESEARCHGATE SNOWBALL LITERATURE REVIEW
Is not a cronological summary of what other people have
aid e.g.: Author A (year) said , and Author B (year) said You need to synthesize not merely summarize the existing knowledge Novice researchers normally will copy and paste information without 'digesting' the information at all. This is unacceptable! DIFFERENT POINTS, DIFFERENT AUTHORS HOW DO YOU SYNTHESIZE? HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR? HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR?
define your research questions
plan your approach to your research and your review search the literature analyze the material you have found manage the result of your research write your literature HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR?
brainstrom the sub topics that suit
your research area list it down re-arrange put the literature under the sub-topics syhnthesize, paraphrase NVIVO AND LR
brainstrom the sub topics that suit
your research area list it down re-arrange put the literature under the sub-topics syhnthesize, paraphrase
Investigating Moroccan University Students Difficulties in Dealing With Concrete and Abstract Prepositions: The Case of The English Department in The School of Arts and Humanities, Meknes, Morocco