Literature Review: Dr. Fariza Khalid

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 35

GB6013 LITERATURE REVIEW

DR. FARIZA KHALID


LITERATURE REVIEW

A select analysis of existing research which is


relevant to your topic, showing how it relates to
your investigation.
It explains and justifies how your investigation
may help answer some of the questions or gaps
in this area Of research.
LITERATURE REVIEW

situates your research focus within the


context of the wider academic
community in your field;
reports your critical review of the
relevant literature; and
identifies a gap within that literature that
your research will attempt to address.
WHY LITERATURE REVIEW?

To have up-to-date awareness of the


relevant work of others
To make sure the relevance of your
research question
To ‘address a gap’
WHY LITERATURE REVIEW?

To understand and critically analyse the


background research
To select and source the information
that is necessary to develop
a context for your research
LR PROCESS
DURING

PRIOR AT THE END


PRIOR

An early view to establish the


context and rationale for your study
and to confirm your choice of
research focus/question
DURING

Make sure that you keep in touch


with current, relevant research in your
field, which is published during the
period of your research
WHEN YOU READ, THINK ABOUT:
What were the research aims of the paper/book?
Is the research aim achieved? If so, how did they do it?
Are there any problems with their methodology?
Was it a strong or a weak research model?
How will this research help with your own research?
What can you take from it?
What needs to be avoided?
What are you doing differently?
AT THE END

Relate your findings to the findings of


others, and to identify their
implications for theory, practice, and
research.
Ways of finding relevant material

Electronic References of Hand searching of


sources references journals
THINK ABOUT YOUR OWN LITERATURE

Who are the key players in my field?


What are the main ideas/debates in my field?
How have these ideas changed over time?
What are some of the problems with these
ideas/debates?
Is there a problem with the methodology?
What are you going to do differently?
First stage of the literature review is to
identify the key people in your field

What research and theory is there on my topic?


What are the key sources (books, articles) on my
topic?
Who are the main theorists and researchers in
this area?
How has the topic/problem been investigated
over time?
Identify a ‘gap’ in the literature

What  are the strengths and weaknesses of these


debates?
What evidence is lacking, inconclusive or limited?
What will you add to the topic? What will you do
differently?
WRITING IT UP

It should be framed by your research questions.


It must relate to your study
Be in control, not totally deferent to or ‘tossed
about by previous literature'.
Be selective. Ask ‘why am I including this?’
Engage in a dialogue with the literature, you are
not just providing a summary
WRITING IT UP

should be summarized, synthesized and critically


written
you need to digest information from different
sources , critically ecvaluate it and present your
conclusion in a concise, logicalland 'reader-friendly'
manner
SYNTHESIS WRITING

ARTICLE 1 ARTICLE 2 ARTICLE 3


what does this
all mean?

CRITICAL INTEGRATION AND SYNTHESIS


Synthesis - the combination
of components to form a
new connected whole
LITERATURE REVIEW
CRITICAL ENQUIRY

academic research is about critial enquiry therefore,it


is_important_that_you_critically_evaluate_the_mater
ial.
do you agree with the conclusions?
if not, why?
you need to digest information from different
sources , critically ecvaluate it and present your
conclusion in a concise, logicalland 'reader-friendly'
manner
COMPILING LITERATURE

find appropriate literature on a specific topic


manage the information
present a logical, synthesized, and reader-friendly
review of the current knowledge relating to a specific
topic
FINDING LITERATURE

Use the library database - eJournal Portal


Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Snow ball from the list of references in an article
E-JOURNAL PORTAL
I-QUEST
I-QUEST
GOOGLE SCHOLAR
ACADEMIA
RESEARCHGATE
SNOWBALL
LITERATURE REVIEW

Is not a cronological summary of what other people have


aid e.g.: Author A (year) said , and Author B (year) said
You need to synthesize not merely summarize the existing
knowledge
Novice researchers normally will copy and paste
information without 'digesting' the information at all. This is
unacceptable!
DIFFERENT POINTS, DIFFERENT AUTHORS
HOW DO YOU SYNTHESIZE?
HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR?
HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR?

define your research questions


plan your approach to your research and your review
search the literature
analyze the material you have found
manage the result of your research
write your literature
HOW DO YOU PLAN YOUR LR?

brainstrom the sub topics that suit


your research area
list it down
re-arrange
put the literature under the sub-topics
syhnthesize, paraphrase
NVIVO AND LR

brainstrom the sub topics that suit


your research area
list it down
re-arrange
put the literature under the sub-topics
syhnthesize, paraphrase

You might also like