Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 79 views

    C++ STL JAVA Collections

    Uploaded by

    Akash Shaw
    The C++ Standard Template Library (STL) uses templates that allow for type-safe generic collections while the Java Collections Framework (JCF) uses object collections without type safety. STL focuses on performance and iterator design while JCF prioritizes interfaces and memory is automatically managed. Key differences include how each handles types, algorithms, memory, and passing functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    C++ STL JAVA Collections

    Uploaded by

    Akash Shaw
    79 views1 page
    The C++ Standard Template Library (STL) uses templates that allow for type-safe generic collections while the Java Collections Framework (JCF) uses object collections without type safety. STL focuses on performance and iterator design while JCF prioritizes interfaces and memory is automatically managed. Key differences include how each handles types, algorithms, memory, and passing functions.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The C++ Standard Template Library (STL) uses templates that allow for type-safe generic collections while the Java Collections Framework (JCF) uses object collections without type safety. STL focuses on performance and iterator design while JCF prioritizes interfaces and memory is automatically managed. Key differences include how each handles types, algorithms, memory, and passing functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    79 views1 page

    C++ STL JAVA Collections

    Uploaded by

    Akash Shaw
    The C++ Standard Template Library (STL) uses templates that allow for type-safe generic collections while the Java Collections Framework (JCF) uses object collections without type safety. STL focuses on performance and iterator design while JCF prioritizes interfaces and memory is automatically managed. Key differences include how each handles types, algorithms, memory, and passing functions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Differences between the C++ Standard Template Library (STL) and the Java

    Collections Framework (JCF) include the following:

     STL uses template classes and functions which have type parameters. In the
    JCF, the collection classes provide collections of Objects. In Java, there is
    no way to create a general collection in which all of the elements have the
    same type. Instead, the collections are all collections of objects. These
    collections can hold objects of any type, and there is no way for the
    compiler to verify that all of the objects that are put in the collection are of
    the same type. With template classes it is possible to design a general
    collection in which all of the elements are of the same type and for which
    the compiler can enforce that only objects of the correct type are added to
    the collection. In contrast, the Java programmer must provide class casts
    when removing the objects from the collections. In this case, type errors are
    not caught until runtime, when they show up as class cast exceptions.
     STL include performance as part of the interface requirements. This is not
    normally the case for java collections.
     In Java, the algorithms are organized by container, while in STL the
    algorithms are independent of the container on which they operate.
     STL uses value semantics so that assignment copies a collection. Java uses
    reference semantics and assignment simply assigns a reference. Similarly,
    Java collections always contain pointers to objects, while STL collections
    can contain pointers to objects or the objects themselves.
     STL iterators differ from those in Java. STL has a hierarchy of iterators
    which different capabilities, including moving either only forward or
    moving forward and backward, and providing random access to container
    elements. Container classes are characterized by the iterators that they
    provide, and generic algorithms are characterized by the iterators that they
    use. Iterators in STL have values that can be compared. Java only provides
    Iterator and ListIterator. Random access iterators are not provided, and
    interators do not have values that can be compared.
     Java relies heavily on interfaces which do not exist in C++
     In STL, containers can contain either objects or objects of primitive types,
    and many algorithms operate on either containers or arrays. In Java,
    containers contain only objects, and algorithms must be defined separately
    for containers and for arrays.
     The memory allocation model is part of the STL framework and the STL
    programmer needs to be aware of deallocating memory. Neither of these are
    concerns in the JCF.
     C++ allows passing functions as parameters which is not allowed in Java.

    You might also like