Cortir Handbook 2019
Cortir Handbook 2019
Cortir Handbook 2019
BLADES
Handbook
Edition 2019 CORTIR
KIRTxTHOMSEN
Concept & Design
Communication design, illustration and graphic design
KIRTxTHOMSEN
Contributors
Partners
|
The Blade Handbook™ A shared lingo of terms and definitions for wind turbine blades
Developed by Bladena and KIRT x THOMSEN in LEX, RATZ, EWIC and CORTIR projects mainly funded by EUDP (Energy Technology
Andersen & Co (FORCE Technology), John Dalsgaard Sørensen & Co (AAU), Lars Damkilde & Co (AAU), Christian Berggreen & Co (DTU
Mek), Torben J. Larsen & Co (DTU Wind) Peder Jacobsen & Co (Global Wind Service), Mads Lübbert & Co (DIS)
N
SWA ECO
C
DI
LA
ISBN 978-87-971709-0-8
NOR
BEL
THE BLADE
HANDBOOK™
A shared lingo for the future of wind
Copyright © 2019
Although the authors and publisher have made every effort
to ensure that the information in this book was correct,
they do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any
parts for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors
or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from
negligence, accident, or any other cause. No part of this
publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in
any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording,
or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior
written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief
quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-
commercial uses permitted by the copyright law.
CONTENTS
PART I
1 | BLADE ANATOMY 10
Blade & cross section
Surface
Inside
Root
Load cases
2 | STRUCTURAL 22
Strain & Stress
Materials
Beam structure
Bending & Torsion
Local effects
3 | LOADS 32
Wind conditions
Turbulence
Aerodynamics
Structural dynamics
PART II
4 | VIBRATIONS 42
Aeroelastic instability
5 | FAILURES 46
Failure modes
Root causes
Safety margins
6 | TESTING 60
Hybrid testing/hybrid simulation
8 | FRACTURE MECHANICS 70
Fracture modes
Crack loading
Cohesion strength in composites
PART III
9 | INSPECTION & SERVICE WORK 82
Working conditions
Inspection
10 | MARKET 86
Operation & maintenance
IEC references
Market map
Market & Decision Drivers
Decision Making / Operator's Focus
NOMENCLATURE 118
Thus, this Blade Handbook is aimed at helping all parties involved in R&D of wind
turbine blades to get a common understanding of words, process, levels and
concepts.
2 | STRUCTURAL
Strain & Stress
Materials
Beam structure
Bending & Torsion
Local effects
3 | LOADS
Wind conditions
Turbulence
Aerodynamics
Structural dynamics
1 | BLADE ANATOMY
ANATOMY OF A BLADE
BLADE SECTIONS
A wind turbine blade is divided into different sections as shown
Tip Section
Mid Section
Leading Edge L
Transition Zone
Shear
Webs
Spar cap
e g dE g n i da eL e g dE g n i l i a r T
e d i S er u s s er P
pa C ra p S e d i S n o i t c u S
e d i S n o itc u S b e W r a e h S t n or F
b e W raehS tfA
b e W raehS pa C ra p S e d i S n o i t c u S
t n i o P n o i t s i s narT e g d E g n i da eL
e s i w d r o h C e n i L r e t n e C e da lB
dE g n i da eL t n i o P n o i t c e n n o C e g dE g n i da eL
e g dE g n i l i a r T
t n i o P n o i t s i s narT e g d E g n i da eL t n i o P n o i t c e n n o C e g d E g n i l iarT
dr o h C e da lB dr o h C e da lB
C ra p S e d i S er u s s er P
pa C ra p S e d i S er u s s er P thgieH THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo
pa C ra p S e d i S er u s s er P t h g i efor
H the future of wind 11
e d i S er u s s er P
1 | BLADE ANATOMY
ANATOMY OF A BLADE
FUNCTION
The primary function of the blade is to capture the wind and transfer the load to the shaft.
This creates a bending moment on the root bearing, and a torque on the main shaft.
Wind
Flap Flap
Flap
Gravity
Edge Edge
Edge
Shell 1
Shell 2
Shear web(s)
Root
SURFACE
SHELLS
The SS and PS shells are large aerodynamic panels designed to transfer lift, created by the
shells, to the spar caps.
SS
SS PS
Adhesive joint
PS
Adhesive
They are typically moulded in two blade shell jointand PS moulds), and adhesively
tools (SS
bonded to each other along their leading and trailing edge, and to the SS and PS spar caps
Core
in the middle. The shell skins are lightweight glass fiber skins (often 2 to 54 layers of triax
Core
material at 0, +45 and -45Deg), of low thickness; they therefore need to be stabilised by the
use of a core (PVC or PET core, balsa, etc.). Without a core, they would buckle and would
therefore not be able to keep their required profile.
Adhesive
Adhesive Core
Core
Skins
Adhesive
Adhesive
Skins
They are long, narrow and slender components; thick at the root end, thin at the tip end.
They are mostly made of unidirectional fibers (0°) and some off-axis material (up to 20%),
which makes them less sensitive to twist, torsion and other induced loads.
Tip
n
Root
SS Com pressio
ion
Tens
PS
Wind
Spar cap 1
Spar cap 2
Spar cap 3
Biax THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 15
Tip
1 | BLADE ANATOMY
SHEAR WEBS
Spar cap 2
Shear webs are one of the simpler parts to design and manufacture. The primary function of
Spar cap 3
the shear web(s) is to keep the PS and SS caps away from each other, allowing the blade to
behave as a beam and retain its global stiffness.
Biax
Tip
Root
Core
They only carry shear loads, and the challenge from a design point of view is to stop them
crushing and/or buckling.
Construction is typically 2 to 8 plies of +/-45° glass biax either side of a low density core
(PVC, balsa, PET, etc.).
They sometime include feets or flanges, a transition where the skins join each others to
facilitate the load transfer to the shells or spar caps.
3 webs, 6 caps
ROOT
SHEAR WEBS
The primary function of the root is to transfer the bending moment of the blade to the root
bearing in the most uniform way, without damaging it.
This is usually achieved by progressively re-directing the loads carried in the UD caps into the
root tube, then into the metallic inserts that connect the root to the bearing.
Thin
UD
Thick
Biax
Triax
The metallic inserts usually extend from the hub and between 10 to 20% of the blade length
(R2.5 on a 25m blade, R9 on a 45m blade)
The root is typically a thick laminate, with a limited amount of fibers at 0° and most fibers at +/- 45°.
The thickness is needed to accommodate the root bolts, that create weakness in the laminate.
Blade manufacturing procedures can introduce conditions in the composite which strongly
influence fatigue life and potential failures. These conditions include local variations in resin
mixture homogeneity, local porosity variaions, local fiber curvature and misalignment of fibers
as well as local residual stresses. Such conditions are variables in all composite manufacturing
processes and should be considered in design.
Regardless if the exact same manufacturing process is achieved with the exact same
manufacturing conditions and materials, the composite specimen will never be completely
identical to the previously manufactured composite specimen.
LOAD CASES
MAIN LOAD DIRECTIONS
FLAPWISE DIRECTION
FLAPWISE DIRECTION
COMBINED LOADING
α
TTL b
LTT
TTL
α STP LTT
b
STP
Flapwise
Flapwise
Edgewise
AXIAL STRAIN
The strains are divided into axial strains (longitudinal and transverse strains) and shear strain.
E.g. elongation of the individual fibers in the axial direction.
SHEAR STRAIN
The other type of strain is shear strains that changes the angles between fibers.
Shear
Stress
Stress
AXIAL STRESS
Similar to strains the stresses can be axial i.e. in the direction of the fiber. Axial stresses can be
a result of bending of a beam or stretching a rod.
SHEAR STRESS
Another type of stress is shear stress and will be directed along the surfaces of the fibers.
Shear stresses can be seen in overlap joints (a) or in torsion of a cross section (b).
a) b)
Stress
Stress
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ Stress
A shared lingo for the future of wind 23
2 | STRUCTURAL
MATERIALS
ELASTIC BEHAVIOR
Materials can behave in many ways but for wind turbine
blades the most important is the elastic behavior.
Load
Time
a) Load cycles induces fatigue over time. b) Example of fatigue cracks in the trailing
edge due to peeling stresses.
Large strength
+ + = COMPOSITES
Biax
Fibers in 2 directions
Weak in shear
Fibers in 2 directions
Stronger in shear
+ Biax
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 25
2 | STRUCTURAL
BEAM STRUCTURE
Wind turbine blades acts as a beam i.e. say a structure with a dominant length direction. Beams used in e.g. building
design normally have constant cross-sections. For various design reasons the beam can also be tapered or twisted.
Constant
Tapered
Twisted
Tapered + Twisted
Together that is a PRE-TWISTED STRUCTURE
(eg. similar to a helicopter blade)
A. BENDING
The primary way of carrying the loads are through bending.
Aerodynamic forces
Gravity
B. AXIAL FORCE
Gravity and centrifugal load creates an axial force which can be tension or compression.
1
Tension
Certifugal
Compression 2 Tension
C. TWISTING
Wind loads act excentrical and creates twisting in the blade.
Twisting Torsion Shear distortion
The twisting will give a rotation of the cross-section (Torsion) and a change in the cross-
section (Shear distortion). Shear distortion becomes more dominant for larger wind turbine
blades (60m+). The contribution is not covered by traditional beam theory, but will be seen
in a Finite Element analysis.
28 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
BENDING + SHEAR FORCE NORMAL + SHEAR STRESS
The bending moments create normal and shear stresses
Normal stress
Shear stress
LOCAL EFFECTS
In classical beam theory the load perpendicular on the blade is not accounted for in detail. However wind load acting
on the blade will create bending/shear in the transverse plane in the blade. These stresses may reduce the fatigue life
of the blade.
Point loads
REAL LIFE
Distributed loads
The longitudinal stresses from the global deformation (bending) of the blade are far larger
than the local stresses in the transverse plane. Longitudinal stresses stem from the transfer
of the load into the beam. The local stresses can e.g. be due to panel bending, buckling or
cross sectional shear distortion and can have a very large impact on composite structures,
where the main strength direction is the longitudinal and the transverse strength typically is
weaker.
Global
a) Global deformations include bending in
flap and edge. Global deformations are
easily observed with the eye.
Local
WIND CONDITIONS
GLOBAL
Polar high
Polar easterlies
The sun is the key source of the wind systems on
the planet. The heat over equator causes rising air Polar front
and flow near the surface from north and south. Westerlies
Horse latitudes
NE
The Coriolis force “bends” the flow causing three trade winds
Hadley cell
30o
60o
REGIONAL
More locally, but still on a large scale, the wind is H
104
HTK
driven from local high to low pressure regions. The T
1025
25
10
101
H
10
05
to days. 5
5
102
HTK
1005
T
H
T
1015
seconds/days (y-axis). 1
Microscale Convective scale Mesoscale
x
Courtesy
0.01 0.1 Courtney,
1 M,10Troen,10
I. 2(1990).
103Wind10
Spectrum
4
105 for 10
one6 year
10of7
continuous 8Hz measurements.
Geographical dimension m Pp 301-304, 9th symposium on Turbulence
and diffusion.
TURBULENCE
HEIGHTS
The type of terrain near the turbine has a friction level z
u(z)
on the wind - also denoted a terrain roughness. The
roughness causes a near surface boundary layer with
increasing wind speed for increasing height. The roughness
also creates turbulent vortices with length scales
increasing with height.
DAY VS NIGHT
Temperature effects in the boundary layer has a direct impact on the turbulent flow. The mixing of warm and cold
air near the surface causes unstable conditions yielding increased turbulent mixing - with a large shear in the mean
wind speed.
1.5km
200 m
80m
10.0 60m
40m
8.0
10m
6.0
4.0
2.0
00:00 03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00 24:00
Time of day
TERRAIN
A change in terrain roughness cause a change in tubulence regions with height. Here is an example of water - to -
land change causing the lowest level to be dominated by high turbulence (land conditions), the highest level with low
turbulence (water conditions) and an intermediate zone in between.
Wind 10m
5m
2m 2m 2m
2m
AERODYNAMICS
AIRFOIL TERMINOLOGY
2D airfoil terminology
Relative velocity
Lower surface
Chord line Mean line Downwas
h angle
Trailing edge
Lift
Drag
Courtesy Zahle, F., Sørensen, N. N., & Johansen, J. (2009). Wind Turbine 1x wind turbine
Rotor-Tower Interaction Using an Incompressible Overset Grid Method.
Wind Energy, 12(6), 594-619. 10.1002/we.327
WAKE
Courtesy: Machefaux, E., Larsen, G. C., & Mann, J. (2015). Multiple Turbine Wakes. DTU Wind Energy. 4x wind turbines
(DTU Wind Energy PhD; No. 0043(EN)).
Wake pattern from a row of 4 turbines behind each other. The wind speed reduction seen with red colors “waves” in
a pattern caused by the large scale structures in the incoming free wind field. This has a direct negative impact on
the production and also causes increased load levels on the downwind turbines.
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
OPERATIONAL FREQUENCY
A wind turbine is a highly flexible structure. The blades deflect noticeable, but the tower and main shaft are also
highly dynamic - and low damped dynamic systems.
3P, 6P, 9P
Tower loading from turbulence
0P, 1P
Foundation loading from turbulence
MODE SHAPES
Natural frequencies and modeshapes of a
turbine in standstill with the rotor shaft
locked. The order of mode shapes is
more or less always the same. Frequen-
cies decrease for larger turbines. The
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
first two modes mainly consist of tower f= 0.4173 Hz f= 0.4187 Hz f= 1.0553 Hz
Courtesy Hansen, M. H. (2003). Improved modal dynamics of wind turbines to avoid stall-induced vibrations. Wind Energy, 6, 179-195. 10.1002/we.79
5 | FAILURES
Failure modes
Root causes
Safety margins
6 | TESTING
Hybrid testing/hybrid simulation
7 | DAMAGE
Damage, defect & failure
NDT
8 | FRACTURE MECH.
Fracture modes
Crack loading
Cohesion strength in composites
4 | VIBRATIONS
VIBRATIONS
NATURAL FREQUENCY
Blades have different natural frequencies depending on the direction of vibration i.e. flapwise,
edgewise and twisting/torsion. Natural frequencies are the inherent frequencies which a
blade will adopt its free vibrations when set in motion by a single impact or a momentarily
displacement from its rest position, while not being influenced by other external forces. A
blade has many different natural frequencies and each has its own distinct mode of vibration.
However, the lower the frequency is – the larger the amplitude of that mode's vibration. Hence,
in practice it is just a few of the lowest frequencies that are governing the overall vibration of
the blade. The natural frequencies of a blade are given by the stiffness, mass-distribution and
damping of the structure.
RESONANCE
Resonance can occur when a blade is excited by external periodic forces at a frequency close
to one of its natural frequencies. Small periodic forces at a resonant frequency can build up to
produce large and violent oscillations of the structure. If the resonance occurs, the structure
could in the worst case collapse.
DAMPING
Damping reduces the amplitude of vibrations in a structure by dissipation energy from the
system. Energy can be dissipated in the structure due to friction and generation of heat or by
means of mechanical devices i.e. a viscous damper (dashpot).
NO DAMPING
Frequency of excitation
Amplitude
of vibration
WITH DAMPING
RESONANCE OCCURS
Frequency of excitation
INCREASED
STIFFNESS
Frequency of excitation
AEROELASTIC INSTABILITY
TWO PHENOMENAS
The phenomenon of aeroelastic instability, also called flutter, can can occur due to the structural
flexibility of wind turbines. Structural deformations induce changes in aerodynamic forces, i.e.
operation above rated speed or during standstill or parked position. The additional aerodynamic
forces cause an increase in the structural deformations, which lead to greater aerodynamic
forces in a feedback process.
The additional forced vibrations interacting with one or two of the blade natural modes of
vibration can result in violent self-feeding vibrations - such as classical flutter, stall flutter
and galloping. Self-feeding vibrations might result in catastrophic structural blade failure, if
resonance occurs.
Vibrations
Wind flow
Flow
IN OPERATION
STALL FLUTTER involves the coupling
Classical Flutter between separated Stall Flutter
and attached flow to the surface of the blade in a cyclic
manner.
Flow Flow
Used in
Failure Mode Recommended industry Required Mentioned
Bond
Bond line
line width
width
Bond
Bond line
line width
width
core
core
Skin/face
Skin/facesheets
sheets
debonding
debonding
debonding
debonding
Undeformed
Deformed
Strains
Wind turbine blades have thick laminates which are very strong in the fiber direction but
very weak in out-of-plane direction that will lead to delamination. Due to the airfoil shape
of wind turbine blades and the structural design with unsupported panels, the laminates
experience bending that causes out-of-plane stresses. While in-plane loads are effectively
carried by fibers, out-of-plane loads are controlled by matrix strength which it is sensitive
to the presence of defects such as porosity and debonding. For wind turbine blades strain
based failure criteria is not relevant since it does not identify the major blade failure modes
(buckling, bondlines, skin debonding and interlaminar failure).
ROOT CAUSE 1
SHEAR DISTORTION
OPERATIONAL FATIGUE
Normal operation
> Cross sectional shear distortion (CSSD)
> Bondlines damage
Bondlines damage
Hot spots
Deformed shape
Peeling stresses appear in the adhesive bondlines along the
Un-deformed shape blades in certain hot spots
AERODYNAMIC
TWIST COUNTERTWIST
FORCES
Gravity Gravity
Twisting Twisting
ROOT CAUSE 2
PANEL BREATHING
OPERATIONAL FATIGUE
Normal operation
> Panel breathing
> Bondlines damage
Blade panel deformations induced by edgewise gravity induced loads during any
operation of any wind turbine makes the panels breath.
Un-deformed shape
BONDLINES DAMAGE
Debonded
shear web
Peeling in the adhesive
bondlines
Undeformed panel
Suction side
Deformed panel
Pressure side
ROOT CAUSE 3
ROOT TRANSITION ZONE
OPERATIONAL FATIGUE
Normal operation
>Panel bending and shear forces
> Root failures
Convex surface
Concave surface
SAFETY MARGINS
Large differences can be found in the safety margins against various types of failure modes,
which indicates that current wind turbine blade designs need to be optimized to a higher
degree with regards to structural strength.
Unit Force
Material Strength-
inplane loads
Safety Strength-
4x t Unit Force
Material
inplane loads
Safety 4x t
TYPICAL CHAIN OF MARGINS: Structural Strength-
Safety 1x t
Weaknesses are perceived Structural Strength-
Safety 1x t
Material Strength-
out-of-plane loads
compensated by strengthening Safety 1x t
Material Strength-
out-of-plane loads
other links. Buckling Strength-
Safety 1.2x t
Safety 1x t
2x Unit Force
Material Strength-
inplane loads
NEW DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: Safety 2x t 2x Unit Force
Material Strength-
inplane loads
Strict focus on strengthening Safety 2x t
Structural Strength-
the weakest link and optimizing Safety 2x t Material Strength-
out-of-plane loads
Structural Strength- Safety 2x t
the other links. Safety 2x t Material Strength-
out-of-plane loads
Buckling Strength- Safety 2x t
Safety 2x1.2x t
2x Unit Force
Buckling Strength-
Safety 2x1.2x t
2x Unit Force
TESTING
FULL SCALE
SUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-COMPONENT
MATERIAL
FIELD
FULL SCALE
3 SUB-STRUCTURE
SUB-COMPONENT
MATERIAL
LENGTH SCALE
Testing is defined on a length scale from micro scale to structural scale
0 1cm 2 03 4
1cm 5
2 3 4 5
HYBRID TESTING/
HYBRID SIMULATION
Blade cut (not full-length blade test)
)
70 m
r (15-
m) om pute
st (0-15 in c
in te lblade
lade igita
ical b D
Phys
Hybrid Simulation is a tool that can be used in substructural testing. Testing at present is
performed mainly on laminate and full scale level.
DEFECT:
A flaw or a weakness in a blade that cause failure.
FAILURE:
The loss of an intended function due to a defect (tensile, shear, compressive etc.).
COLLAPSE:
Complete failure of a blade impossible to repair. Replacement needed.
• Defects are faults in the blade that might come from manufacturing.
• Failures are faults in the blade that have occured during the lifetime of the blade, due to
outside events (excessive loads, fatigue of materials, etc.)
• A lightning strike which results at the opening of the trailing edge of the blade is
considered as damage on the blade.
• The failure of the adhesive in a joint due to excessive loading is considered as a defect
for the blade, but as a failure for the adhesive joint.
1
Cosmetic No need for immediate action Continue
Readings of lightning system Operation
below 50mΩ
2
Damage, below wear and tear Repair only if other damages Continue
are to be repaired Operation
3
Damage, above wear and tear Repair done within next 6 Continue
Readings of lightning system months Operation
above 50mΩ
4
Serious damage Repair performed within next Continue
3 months. Operation
Damage monitored
STOP
5
Critical damage Immediate action required to
prevent turbine damage. Operation
safety is not
Contact technical support ensured
NB! More information about damages and inspections can be found in the NGIR-reports (Next Generation Inspection
Reports), please contact Bladena to require these documents.
NDT
DETECTION OF DEFECTS IN WTG BLADES
8. LIGHTNING RECEPTOR SYSTEM
b. Thermography
d. Digital X-ray
1. DELAMINATION
5. KISSING BOND
3. DRY AREA
At the trailing edge
a. Ultrasonic testing
7. WRINKLES IN LAMINATES
5. KISSING BOND
or missing glue
Kissing bond
Can be difficult to detect because there is almost
no visual difference when blade is stopped. It
is preferable to use automated UT (Ultra-sonic
BLADE IN MOTION BLADE STOPPED testing) for detection. It enables the possibility to
compare adjacent areas.
1. Delamination: Lack of fusion between layers/ two fiber laminates which are
separated.
2. Air inclusions/Porosities: Small or large air pockets or impurities in material.
3. Dry areas: Lack of resin.
4. Adhesive defects: Adhesive not present, insufficient amount of adhesive or not
placed correctly.
5. Kissing bond: Little or no adhesion.
6. Skin/face sheet debonding: The deattachment of the outer or inner skin from
the core on a sandwich material.
7. Wrinkles in glass/carbon fiber laminates: Misalignment of fibers before or during
curing.
8. Placing and integrity of Lightning Receptor System: Are Receptors and internal
connectors intact and placed correctly?
7. Wrinkles in UD laminates
5. Kissing bond
4. Adhesive defects
1. Delamination
NDT
DETECTION METHODS
Transmitter
Transmitter Reciever
Reciever
Acoustic
Acoustic energy
energy
Thick
Thick laminate
laminate Thin
Thin laminate
laminate
abilityGelcoat
to digitally
Gelcoat disbond transfer and
disbond
Thick
Thick laminate
laminate Thin
Thin laminate
laminate
enhance images.
Kissing
Kissing bond
bond
Thick
Thick laminate
laminate Thin
Thin laminate
laminate Thick
Thick laminate
laminate Thin
Thin laminate
laminate
Adhesive
Adhesive defects
defects
Thick
Thick laminate
laminate
68 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™
Thin
Thin laminate
laminate
A shared lingo for the future of wind Thick
Thick laminate
laminate Thin
Thin laminate
laminate
DryDry areas
areas
a. Ultrasonic
a. Ultrasonic
AirAir inclusions
inclusions
b. Thermographic
b. Thermographic
NDT METHODS GRADING SYSTEM
Rating of the NDT detection probability for different defects.
Worst Best
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
[1] DELAMINATION
Thick laminate
Worst Best
Parallel to surface
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Perpendicular to surface
[7] WRINKLES IN LAMINATE
Thin laminate
FRACTURE MODES
DEFINITION
A structure can fail via a propagating crack when a concentrated stress exceeds the material’s
cohesive strength. When a material is subjected to fatigue loading above a certain threshold,
microscopic cracks begin to form in areas with stress concentrations (such as the grain
boundaries in metals or at the fibre-matrix interface in fibre-reinforced composites). The
property which describes the resistance of a material towards the propagation of a crack
is called fracture toughness. The field of mechanics concerned with the study of cracks in
materials is called fracture mechanics.
In a typical structure with defects, if the cracks are sufficiently small, loads redistribute around
cracks with little effect on the global response. Under these conditions, the crack growth
rate can be predicted knowing the material properties, the geometry and the applied loads.
When flaws are sufficiently large, significant load redistribution may lead to uncontrolled crack
propagation, eventually causing the whole structure to fail catastrophically. It is important to
know these operational limits, to inspect and treat damages before they reach a critical size.
The capacity of a structure to fulfill its design function (e.g. to support loads and deform as
expected) under the presence of cracks, is called Damage Tolerance. This term is also used to
describe the design method that takes into account the natural degradation of the materials
and the structural damages occurring during its lifetime. The goal is to provide sufficient safety
and redundancy in case of predictable and unexpected damage.
Safe-life
Safe-life
Safe-life Fail-safe
Fail-safe
Fail-safe Damage
Damage
Damagetolerance
tolerance
tolerance
Interlaminar cracks, (also known as delaminations) are cracks that grow between two plies.
These usually require little energy as they are characterized by low fracture toughness values.
Intralaminar cracks, involve the microscopic debonding between matrix and fibres, and are
typically limited in thickness by the two adjacent plies, but can grow under tension and shear
through a panel.
Translaminar cracks, similar to the previous, but involve the fracture of the fibre by either
traction or compression. Since very high forces are required to fracture fibers, these cracks
typically appear later than the other described above, and are an indication of an advanced
damage state.
Translaminar
cracking
Intralaminar Interlaminar
cracking cracking
z
y
(z - stack direction)
FRACTURE MODES
FRACTURE AND DAMAGE MODES IN COMPOSITES
Composite materials are made of numerous weaved fibre bundles (the reinforcement)
embedded and held together by a resin material (the matrix). In this highly discontinuous
structure, it is common to observe multiple microscopic cracks in different locations. Being
very small, they are hard to detect with conventional methods, but do not pose any significant
risk: It is found that small cracks are present in a composite structure at an early stage, or
already after manufacturing, but these are largely unaffected by loads for a great part of its
operating life.
For this reason, composites are considered more damage tolerant than metals.
Nevertheless, after prolonged loading, these small cracks may eventually coalesce and form a
450
400
350
300
250
macroscopic fracture. Only at this point, a growing macroscopic crack will start to weaken the
200
150
100
50
0
0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
damage exists: This involves the adhesion between the face sheet and the core and takes the
(z - stack direction)
name of face-core debonding.
A debonded sandwich panel will not be able to carry the prescribed loads and has much lower
bending stiffness.
P
P1 ,d1
8 | FRACTURE MECHANICS
CRACK LOADING
MODES OF CRACK LOADING
There are three types of loading that a crack can experience:
Mode I (tearing): The load is opening the two crack faces apart.
Mode II (sliding): The two crack faces slide with respect each other, parallel to the crack
propagation direction.
Mode III (shearing): The two crack faces slide with respect to each other in the out-of-plane or
transverse direction.
A crack experiences mixed-mode loading when a combination of these three modes is applied.
In homogeneous materials, cracks predominantly advance in the most favourable direction,
which coincides to pure mode I: under mixed-mode loading the crack will tend to orient itself
towards a direction where pure mode I exists.
This is not the case for discontinuous materials such as composites: ply interfaces and fibre
alignment act as boundaries which cracks cannot go through. In this case, cracks are forced
to propagate under mixed-mode and the growth rate depends on the particular mixed-mode
fracture toughness.
Mode I
Mode I
Mode I
Mode II
Mode II
Mode III
Mode I/II
ModeI/IIIII
Mode
Mode II
Mode III Mode III
Mode III
FRACTURE MECHANICS
ENERGY RELEASE DURING CRACK PROPAGATION
A crack in a structure propagates if it has sufficient energy to do so. Several methods are
available to measure the amount of energy released during propagation, in basic terms, this can
be found simply from the load-displacement curve.
The amount of energy “contained” into a crack is called the energy release rate. When a crack
propagates, this quantity reaches a critical value, which takes the name of Fracture Toughness
(Gc). It is found that the fracture toughness is independent from the crack length, it is therefore
a constant material property. These are the fundamental quantities used in linear elastic
fracture mechanics.
PP
P1P,d,d
1 1 1
P2P,d,d aa
2 2 2
Gc
Gc
dd==displacement
displacement
2000
1800
1600 Fracture toughness varies depending
G)n
1400 on the mode in which the crack
1200 propagates. For laminated composites,
Gc [J / m2]
1000
mode I is 3 to 5 times weaker than
800
mode II..
n
600
400
200
0
0o 15o 30o 45o 60o 75o 90o
Mixed mode angle
100
m2]
Ultimately, when applying cyclic loads to a structure, the speed at which a crack grows is also
well defined if the loads are expressed using this fundamental material property. The Paris-law
curve, indicates that there is a linear correlation between the energy applied to a crack and the
speed of propagation.
2000
1800
10 -4
da 1600
= C(ΔG)n
dN Note that the quantity G is not equal to
10-5 1400
the applied load. A long crack contains
da/dN [in / cycle]
1200
Gc [J / m2]
10-9 0
0o 15o 30o 45o 60o 75o 9
Mixed mode angle
10 -10
1 10 100
ΔG [J / m2]
COHESION STRENGTH IN
COMPOSITES
FRACTURE
Mode PROCESS
I ZONE Mode II Mode III
Opening
It is possible for interlaminar cracks to Shearing Tearing
be characterised by a long fracture process zone. In this
situation, it is not possible to identify a defined crack tip, but there are two distinct regions: A
zone where the material is beginning to be damaged and has reduced strength and a second
region where intact fibres behind the damage front bridge the crack.
450
Unbonded 400
Damage front
region Fiber bridging
350
300
0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
250 δ a constant). A graph correlating these
X2 two quantities takes the name of
200
150
R-curve.
100
50 R-curve Specimen 2
0 Specimen 1 Specimen 3
0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
Cohesive laws need to be experimentally measured for materials and interfaces. The correct
deduction and implementation of these laws enable the accurate prediction of the behaviour
of cracked composite structures. These are conveniently introduced in numerical Finite
Element tools and used to simulate the propagation of a crack under loads.
X2 σn
δn* δn σn
X1
δn0
δn
a) b)
a) b)
Cohesive zone
a) Illustration of a cohesive zone, which is specified along the anticipated cracking path
b) Example of the cohesive law describing the relation between the normal stress and the separation
10 | MARKET
Operation & maintenance
IEC references
Market map
Market & Decision Drivers
Decision Making / Operator's Focus
11 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Design drivers
Technology Readiness Level
Storyboarding
9 | SERVICE & INSPECTION
WORKING CONDITIONS
ACCESS
2 types of access - indoor or outdoor access
indoor outdoor
acces access
Hatches
(outdoor access)
65
60
175cm
105 53
60
R5000
R10000 R16000
INSPECTION
INSPECTION METHODS
Visual inspection
Acoustic emission
Ultrasonic testing
Shearography
Thermography
Digital X-ray
100
For a specific crack size of a, PoD(a)
is the probability that cracks with
Probability of detection [%]
40
Easy access
20
Moderate access
Difficult access
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Crack size [mm]
This PoD curve was originally referred to a specific NDT technology used in oil & gas industry. It
schematically illustrates the basic idea of PoD. The PoD curves for wind turbine blades may take
another form.
Damage propagation
corresponding to:
Scheduled maintenance
Damage [%]
Using both NDT, outside and inside surface inspection you get the80full picture of the blade’s %
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
condition.
10 %
10 %
80 %
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
The three inspection levels: Outside, inside and NDT inspection. The outside inspection only sees the tip
of the iceberg, by using NDT and inside inspections the whole iceberg can be uncovered.
L2A
LT
L2A
LT
Photos taken with drones or from AI handles the majority of Individual cases are
ground. the data handling reviewed by people
L2A
LT
L2A
fT(t)
FT(t) RT(t)
fT(t)
0 t t
Reliability function RT (t)
= probability that component life > t
h(t) FT(t) RT(t)
Probability of failure FF (t)
= 1 - RTT (t) = probability of failure of component before time t
0 t t
h(t)
t
‘Bathtub curve’
t
Hazard / failure rate
= average number of failures in a given time interval
[t ; t+Δt] given survival of the component up to time t
80
0
0 50 Inspections
Scheduled: 100 after
150predefined
200 scheme.
250 300 350 400
Crack size [mm]
Condition-based: Monitor condition of system and decide if repair is necessary based on
degree of deterioration.
Damage propagation
corresponding to:
Scheduled maintenance
Damage [%]
Corrective maintenance
Condition-based maintenance
Time
5
t4
10 | MARKET 4
3
t2
2
t1
1
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE
Corrective maintenance is based uponDamage
the principle ofT Run toT Failure T T t Failures happen at
T T (RTF).
1 2 3 4 5 F
5
t4
Failure
4
t3
3
t2
2
t1
1
TF,1 TF,2 TF,3 TF,4
T T2 T3 T4 T5 TF t
Example of corrective maintenance, the turbines run until failure.
1
D(t)
CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE
DFailure
Condition-based
fail maintenance is a maintenance strategy that recommends maintenance
actions based on the information depicting the current condition of the wind turbine
blades. A model (no matter if it is a physics-based or data-driven model) characterizing
T1 theTwind t
the deterioration of 2 turbine blades, as the continuous curves shown in this
figure, should be defined. Pre-defined decision alternatives (rules) determines the damage
thresholds, and the maintenance
TF,1
actions to be done
TF,2 TF,3
when aT damage reaches one specific
F,4
damage threshold.
D(t)
Dfail
T1 T2 t
DECISION MAKING
Minimize the total expected total costs (in the remaining lifetime)
Probability of detection
or
Minimize the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE)
Decision alternatives / parameters:
• When and how to inspect?
• When and how much to repair / exchange?
• Which decision rule to apply for choosing between repair alternatives?
• Lifetime extension, e.g. 4 years
0 10 20 30 40 50
Crack depth in mm
State Failure
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 89
yr r
yr-1 r-1
10 | MARKET
an inspection, which is closely associated with the total maintenance costs. Based upon the
8
5
It should be noted that for damage category 5 of offshore wind turbines, a heavy lifting vessel
40
4
(HLV) should typically be chartered to carry the equipment for major repair or replacement,
and a crew transfer
3 vessel (CTV) can often be deployed for the other damage categories.
6 months 1 year 18 months 2 years 3 years 4 years 20
Inspection interval
x 105 0
7 0 50
Cost of waittime
Cost of downtime 3 years
6 Cost of vessel
3 years
Cost of technician
Cost of replacement
5 Cost of repair
Cost [Euro]
Cost of inspection
4 1.5 years
1.5 years 1.5 years
3
0 Damage pr
Decision 1 Decision 2 Decision 3 Decision 4 Decision 5
correspond
Decision alternative
Damage [%]
The total maintenance cost for different decision alternatives - Transverse cracks
x 105
dq
9 100
Total maintenance cost [Euro]
80
6
dq
= C(ΔG) n
dN
5
60
40
4
Damage categories
3
1 2 3
6 months 41 year 518 months 2 years 3 years 4 years 20
Inspection interval
x 10 5 0
Cost trend as 7function of inspection interval – Decision Alternative 2
Cost of waittime 0 50
Cost of downtime 3 years
6 Cost of vessel
3 years
Cost of technician
Cost of replacement
5 Cost of repair
Cost [Euro]
90 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind Cost of inspection
4 1.5 years
1.5 years 1.5 years
3
DECISION ALTERNATIVES - EXAMPLES
DECISION ALTERNATIVE A
1 No action
2 Minor
repair 3 Moderate
repair 4 Moderate
repair 5 Major
repair
DECISION ALTERNATIVE B
1 No action
2 No action
3 Moderate
repair 4 Moderate
repair 5 Major
repair
DECISION ALTERNATIVE C
1 No action
2 No action
3 No action
4 Moderate
repair 5 Major
repair
DECISION ALTERNATIVE D
1 No action
2 No action
3 No action
4 No action
5 Major
repair
1 No action
2 No action
3 No action
4 No action
5 No action
A decision alternative implies the action “to repair or not to repair” dependent on the current damage
category. Above, five different decision alternatives is shown.
Category Description
1 Cosmetic / no damage
2 Damage below wear and tear
3 Damage above wear and tear
4 Serious damage
5 Critical damage
The Markov model gives the probability of evolution of damage from time step to time step,
e.g. the probability that a damage in category 2 develops to category 3 within the next month.
The model assumes that predictions for the future development of the damage can be made
solely on its present state.
Furtheremore it can be used to estimate e.g. the time to reach a category 5 damage (failure)
given it is in category 1 now, represented by a probability distribution function. Example:
(expected value: 12.4 years and standard deviation 6.5 years):
0.9
0.8
Cumulative Distribution Function CDF [-]
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time to failure [years]
Corrective Preventive
(Repair after failure) (Repair before failure)
Maintenance costs
Expected failure costs
Total costs
Expected costs
Optimal strategy
Maintenance effort
The optimal maintenance strategy.
Failure types
a) Failures that can be repaired / maintained
State Failure
yr r
yr-1 r-1
.
....
.....
y2 2
y1 1
y0 0
T0 T1 T2 ..... Tr-1 Time
Cost [Euro]
Cost of inspection
4 1.5 years
1.5 years 1.5 years
3
0
Decision 1 Decision 2 Decision 3 Decision 4 Decision 5
DAMAGE PROPAGATION Decision alternative
dq
= C(ΔG)n
dN
Damage categories
Damage
1 2 3 4 5
t5
5
t4
4
t3
3
t2
2
t1
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 TF t
IEC REFERENCES
WIND TURBINE STANDARDIZATION IEC
The IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is a worldwide organization for
standardization comprising all national electrotechnical committees. The object of the IEC
is to promote international co-operation on all questions concerning standardization in the
electrical and electronic fields. To this end and in addition to other activities, the IEC publishes
International Standards.
IEC 61400-15 Assessment of site specific wind conditions for wind power
stations
IEC 61400-28 TS Through life management and life extension of wind power assets
MARKET MAP
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
The development of a wind project – from the need is defined till the site is cleaned up
after decommissioning – involves several stakeholders each performing various activities as
specified below. The lead of the work till commissioning of the project is the Developer. After
that, the lead is called the Operator. Developer and Operator can be the same entity, but both
Developer
Owners engineer
Financial advisor
Operator
EPC contractor
Insurance company
Commisioning Repairs
Retrofits
Upgrades and
repowering
MARKET MAP
WIND TURBINE OPERATION & MAINTENANCE EXECUTION OPTIONS
The current trend among utilities (owners of distribution nets and end-users) with bidding
out projects in public tendering covering both financing, construction and operation of a
project paid by the developer via procurement of the electricity production to the tendered
Fit-in-Tariff is effectively an outsourcing of the operation and maintenance to an operator.
Identification Assesment
What are the risks? What is the likelihood of the risk
$ Return (benefit)
occuring?
$
OWNER'S/
Investment (cost)
= ROI
OPERATION IN OPERATION OUTSIDE WAR-
How severe will the risk impact
be? OPERATION OUTSIDE WAR-
PROJECT WARRANTY Monitoring RANTYControl RANTY
DEVELOPER'S
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN
Has the situation changed?
Are there new risks emerging? IN HOUSE What can we do to reduce
the impact of the risk? OUTSOURCED
n = Number of cash flows
RISK LEVEL
CFj
IRR
= Cash flow at period j
= Internal Rate of Return
Identification
What are the risks?
Assesment
What is the likelihood of the risk
k level $ Return (benefit)
occuring?
k
0 = ∑ CFj = 1ROI
(1 IRR)-n
j
(1
∑ nq
IRR)q<j CF0 How severe will the risk impact
Investment (cost)
j=1 IRR CONTINUOUS
be?
Turbine OEM Full outsourcing of both
1
$
IMPROVEMENT
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN Are there new risks emerging? PL the impact of the risk?
ntracts n = Number of cash flows
Identification Assesment
dmin Contract realized revenue
CFj = Cash flow at period j
What are the risks? What is the likelihood of the risk
$ Return (benefit)
Contract realized total costIRR
for delivery
= Internal Rate of Return
occuring? K
Contract margin
= ROI EC risk impact
AC
k
1 (1 IRR)-n
∑ nq
How severe will the
CH
j
2
Monitoring Control
ASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONHas DE-COMISSIONING
the situation changed? What can we do to reduce
theNimpact of the risk?
Turbine OEM
(TENDERING)
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURNPROCUREMENT
Identification
Are there new risks emerging? Assesment
LA
DO
nnection
benefit)
n =concept
Business
and case
Number of cash flows
Final micrositing
and project layout
Manufacture Inspection What are thedown
Closing risks? What isPthe likelihood of the risk
PLAN
CFj = Cash flow at period j occuring?
=IRRROI= Internal Rate of Return How severe will the risk impact
ntract
ome realized revenue
ent (cost) Equity investor Procurement of Logistics Service De-commisioning
be? DO
ntract realized total kcost for delivery
1 (1 IRR)equipment
-n and j
∑ nq
0 = ∑ CFj (1
civil works IRR)q<j CF0
CONTINUOUS K
EC
ntract margin IRR
AC
j=1
Monitoring Control
IMPROVEMENT CH
construction Debt financing Construction plan Construction and Maintenance Clean-up
ACT CHECK
T
3
Has the situation changed? What can we do to reduce
g permits and Construction Insurance covering Commisioning Repairs
the impact of the risk?
TE OF RETURN financing
d approvals Identification
Are there new risks emerging? Assesment Either with own or sourced service with independent service
= Number of cash flows What are the risks? What is theLA
N
likelihood of the risk
DO
ANCING
tual strategy PLANNING
Liability
= Cash flow at period
plan
coverage
j & CONSTRUCTION OPERATION
Retrofits DE-COMISSIONING
occuring?P engineers or a combination of provider
OI
NDERING) PROCUREMENT
How severe will the risk impact
= Internal Rate of Return
be?
those two.
Inspection Upgrades andClosing down
ness
case
concept
plan and
1 (1 IRR)-n j
Final micrositing
and(1
project
∑ nq
layout
Manufacture
repowering PLAN
IRR) q<j
CF0
for delivery
IRR CONTINUOUS
Monitoring Control
IMPROVEMENT CK
AC
equipment and
Has the situation changed?
4
civil works
Are there new risks emerging? the impact of the risk?
t financing Construction plan Construction and Maintenance Clean-up Either with own or sourced service
AN
ws
and permit installation ACT CHECK
DO
j
CONSTRUCTION OPERATION DE-COMISSIONING
PL engineers or a combination of
LANNING &
those two.
struction
urn Insurance covering
Commisioning Repairs
ROCUREMENT
cing
∑ nq
1 IRR)q<j CF0
nal micrositing
lity coverage
d project layout
Manufacture Inspection
Retrofits
Closing down
CONTINUOUS
PLAN
IMPROVEMENT K
EC
AC
5
uipment and repowering
il works
level.
AN
DO
nstruction plan
d permit
Construction and
installation
Maintenance Clean-up
PL ACT Either with own or sourced service
CHECK
CONSTRUCTION OPERATION DE-COMISSIONING engineers or a combination of
urance covering Commisioning Repairs
those two.
Manufacture Inspection Closing down
Retrofits PLAN K
EC
AC
CH
T
Commisioning Repairs
Inspection Closing down
PLAN
100 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
Retrofits
Service De-commisioning DO
Upgrades and
repowering
WIND PROJECT LIABILITIES AND INSURANCE COVERAGE OPTIONS
WEAR AND TEAR Natural and inevitable degra- WTO WTO O&M cover, but only to cover
dation of the blade due to unexpected peaks in cost.
operation as per the operation-
al procedure.
QUALITY Quality issues in material, OEM WTO Extended Warranty and/or O&M
workmanship, production Cover. Business interruption.
methods, transport, storage and Serial defects will only be
installation. covered until is is realised that
they are serial defects. If serial,
regress towards OEM.
DESIGN Either defects due to faulty OEM OEM Latent Defects and Business
cotnfiguration/selection of interruption. Regress towards
turbine or serial defects. OEM.
ACT OF GOD Lighting, flooding, extreme WTO WTO All risk and business
weather interruption.
ACCIDENT Any accidental damages to WTO WTO All risk and business
assets. interruption.
WILFUL Theft, vandalism, sabotage, WTO WTO Operator’s risk and business
terrorism interruption.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 101
10 | MARKET
MARKET MAP
WHAT DRIVES WHO WHEN IN A WIND PROJECT
Although the overall driver for the total project lifetime profitability is the full LCOE with all
its components, each stakeholder will sub-optimize on other cost components. As all other
projects, the construction, operation and maintenance of a wind project, there are inherent
conflicts among the stakeholders as regards to priorities in each specific situation.
FINANCIAL
OPERATOR INSTITUTION Contract Margin
Operational Profit Risk Management
Continuous Business Brand
AEP and
and Return of
LCOE
Operator of Investor
Bank, Fund, either a single
or Export Improvement Investment
project or a portfolio
Credit Agency of projects.
providing
Income model
debt-based purely by
financing for sell of
a project.
energy.
EPC CONTRACTOR
OWNER Contract Margin
Operational Profit Risk Management
Continuous Business CAPEXon Investment
Return
Company
Owner of aexecuting the full EPC
project. Typically, a Improvement
contractpurpose
special (Turbines, electrical
company andwork
and civil work) for a project.
owned by either by an utility or
by an operator.
INSURANCE COMPANY
PROJECT DEVELOPER Contract Margin Risk Management Brand
AEP and Brand
Companiesof
Developer providing
a project.insurance
coverage of project liabilities.
$ Return (benefit)
= ROI
$
Investment (cost)
$ Return (benefit)
ed revenue
ed total cost for delivery
gin
104 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
venue
1/4 Business
Improvement
Risk level
$ Return (benefit)
1/2 3/4
= RO
$
Investment (cost)
OPERATIONAL PROFIT AND CONTRACT MARGIN
Company level (given period):
0 = ∑ CFj
Operational profit j=1 Contract
IRR marg
CAPEX + OPEX
LCOE =
AEP
or
106 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
Wind Turbines
Electrical
infrastructure
Assembly &
installation
Ref.: MEGAVIND, 2013: THE DANISH WIND POWER HUB - Strategy for Research, Development, and Demonstration
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 107
10 | MARKET
DECISION MAKING /
OPERATOR'S FOCUS
OPERATIONAL RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT
Overview of general elements to review to establish risk and opportunity elements for
operational management of a wind turbine project. For each element, the operational
management can execute investments to either improve performance, mitigate risk or limit
impact for malperformance.
= ROI
Investment (cost)
Climate Inspection and
analysis
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN
0 = ∑ CFj
IRR = Internal Rate of Return j=1 IRR
System powerk Wind turbine-n ∑ nq Liability coverage Defects and
1 (1 IRR) j
0 = ∑ CFj
performance (1 IRR)q<j CF0 failures
j=1 IRR
Off take
very of contracts
Time to
react
$ Ret
Damage control
Risk $
Inv
Management
1/2
INTERNA
Continuous
1/4 Business
Improvement
C
I
Risk level
1/2 3/4 k
0= ∑
j=1
SITING
N INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLANNING &
A
DO
PL (TENDERING) PROCUREMENT
CH
T
DECISION MAKING /
OPERATOR'S FOCUS
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk management is the identification, evaluation, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO
31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical
application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability or impact of
unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities.
Identification Assesment
What are the risks? What is the likelihood of the risk
occuring?
How severe will the risk impact
be?
Monitoring Control
Has the situation changed? What can we do to reduce
Are there new risks emerging? the impact of the risk?
CONTINUOUS
DAMAGE CONTROL IMPROVEMENT
Damage control is action that is taken to make N the bad results of something as small as
Aresults
DO
K
EC
AC
CH
T
110 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
DE-COMISSIONING
PRIORITISATION OF INVESTMENT
Each activity to improve operations or reduce impacts will be an investment which will
be prioritized among the full portfolio of potential investments. A number of models and
parameters are used to prioritize between the portfolio:
Cost of no action
Complexity of implementation
Return on Investment
Contractual Constrain: Will the implementation breach any contracts, either in word or spirit?
Policy Constrain: Does the implementation conflict with any of our internal policies, including
maximum payback time or minimum Return of Investment?
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 111
10 | MARKET
DECISION MAKING /
OPERATOR'S FOCUS
PRIORITIZATION OF INVESTMENT
Most organizations will prioritize their investments within their constraints annually in the
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - OPEX
Annual Operating Plan with an objective to maximize their overall Return on Investment in
the following order and to the limit of their budgeted investment capacity:
Operator
nce company
#32
3. Low hanging fruits with high Return on Investment to a given minimum
4. Other investment ranked as per their Return on Investment or other predefined ranking
methods to the limit of the budgeted investment capacity.
stor and financial institution
DE-
OPERATION
COMISSIONING
For an investment request (for blade repairs, blade upgrades or optimization) to be
Inspection
successful, it has to be ranked so high in the priority list that it is within the investment
Closing down
capacity.
Service De-commisioning
INVESTMENT CAPACITY
Maintenance Clean-up
g Repairs
09
Retrofits
16
12
Upgrades and
repowering
38 18
08
05 29
23
32
15 26
112 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
SIZE MATTERS
As the blade size increases both the risk and opportunity related to blades and their impact on
the overall LCOE increases, and hence blade investments will be ranked relatively higher on the
priority list going forward. However, as the operating experience and hence realized operating
cost is limited, it is important to monitor and analyse performance of said blade and hence pre-
actively and consciously manage risk related to the blades.
125m
160 m
95m
140 m
80m
120 m
100 m 50m
80 m
60 m
23m
40 m
BLAD E 12m
20 m
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 113
11 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
DESIGN DRIVERS
Key areas cover the entire area of design parameters, which are key for driving the product
development forward and minimizing the risk early on in the design process.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Discovery/ Laboratory Open Water Commercial
Concept Definition Validation Validation Deployment
Proof of Test Facility System Demo &
Concept Validation Verification
BRAINSTORMING
This process involves generation of a vast number of ideas that can solve or mitigate a
specific problem. In the course of brainstorming, there is no assessment of ideas. So, people
can speak out their ideas freely without fear of criticism. Even bizarre/strange ideas are
accepted with open hands. In fact, the crazier the idea, the better. Taming down is easier
than thinking up.
Frequently, ideas are blended to create one good idea as indicated by the slogan “1+1=3.”
Brainstorming can be done both individually and in groups. The typical brainstorming group
includes six to ten people.
114 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
MORPHOLOGY MATRIX
User and stakeholder feedback method to put up options and possibilities in a simple form to
gain input, overview and generate alignment among key project participants.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 115
11 | PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
STORYBOARDING
Storyboarding has to do with developing a visual story to explain or explore. Storyboards can
help creative people represent information they gained during research. Pictures, quotes
from the user, and other pertinent information are fixed on cork board, or any comparable
surface, to stand for a scenario and to assist with comprehending the relationships between
various ideas.
0,5m 45o
fibers
1,5m
8 plates 14 x sets
Glue
32 x sets Laminat
(4 layers)
Laser measuring
4m
1) 1,5m
5,5m
600mm 2) 3) Prepare installation area
4)
Area of installation
Reinforce manhole
Entrance
5) B2
As far as 6) Measure for Plates
Fitting with
cardboard plates
Install brackets
B2
room 7) Cut and Install Plate 1
Push in
1 - Cut brackets to fit curve in TE
2 - Bottom sucktion side B1 ?
B1
3 - Top sucktion side B2 B1
B3 B3
116 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
PROTOTYPING
A prototype is an early sample, model, or release of a product built to test a concept or
process or to act as a thing to be replicated or learned from.
Basic prototype categories.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 117
APPENDIX
NOMENCLATURE
AEROELASTICITY
The science which studies the interactions among inertial, elastic, and aerodynamic forces.
AERODYNAMIC FORCES
Forces caused by the wind flow over structures.
CAPEX
Capital Expense. The money the company spends to acquire or upgrade its physical assets.
COMPOSITE MATERIAL
A composite material is made by combining two or more materials – often ones that have
very different properties. The two materials work together to give the composite unique
properties.
COMBINED LOADING
A mix of two or more loads. I.e. the mix of gravitational load and flapwise load.
118 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE (CBM)
A maintenance strategy that recommends maintenance actions based on the information on
the current damage severity.
CORTIR
Cost and Risk Tool for Interim and Preventive Repair. The title of an EUDP Project headed by
Bladena.
DECISION ALTERNATIVE/RULE
The decision alternative/rule defines the actual maintenance actions for a specific damage
observed at an inspection.
DOWNTIME
The time which the wind turbine is not producing electricity.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 119
APPENDIX
NOMENCLATURE
FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA)
FMEA is a risk assessment tool, that evaluates the severity, occurrence, and detection of risks
to prioritize which ones are the most urgent.
FATIGUE
The process in which damage accumulates due to application of loads reversals whose
magnitude are typically much lower than the strength of the material.
GUIDE2DEFECT (G2D)
A Danish company (spin-off from Bladena) which has a blade database of failures from the
field.
ISP
Independent Service Provider.
MATERIAL STRENGTH
Ability to withstand an applied load without failure.
120 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
MEAN WIND SPEED
Average wind speed over a 10 minute time interval.
MODE SHAPE
Specific pattern of vibration executed by a mechanical system at a specific frequency.
O&M
Operation and Maintenance.
OEM
Original equipment manufacturer.
OPEX
Operational Expenses. The money the company spends on an ongoing, day-to-day basis in
order to run a business (the wind turbine).
OWNERS REQUIREMENT
Additional specifications added to the existing certification requirements found in standards
today.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 121
APPENDIX
NOMENCLATURE
PPA
Power purchase agreement.
PTC
Power tax credit.
RISK
The probability that the investment will lose value.
122 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind
THE MARKOV MODEL
In probability theory, a Markov model is a stochastic model used to model randomly changing
systems. It is assumed that future states depend only on the current state, not on the
events that occurred before.
TURBULENCE (WIND)
Atmospheric turbulence is the set of apparently random and continuously changing air
motions that are superimposed on the wind’s average motion.
VALUE CHAIN
The Value Chain in the Wind Industry consists of three parties: Wind Turbine Manufacturers
(OEMs), Wind Turbine Owners (WTOs) and Insurance Companies.
WTG
Wind Turbine Generator.
WTO
Wind Turbine Owner.
THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind 123
BLADE
HANDBOOK
Developed by Editor
124 THE BLADE HANDBOOK™ A shared lingo for the future of wind N
SWA ECO
KIRTxTHOMSEN
C
DI
LA
NOR
ISBN 978-87-971709-0-8
BEL