Dw02 Essay
Dw02 Essay
The photographs in this unit, unless otherwise noted, are from the
Worcester Photographic Collection, courtesy of the
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
For most Americans in 1898, the Philippines was a new and distant place. The United
States concluded a brief war with Spain in August 1898, and the terms of the Treaty of
Paris, signed in December, granted the Philippines to the United States in exchange for
a $20 million payment to the Spanish Empire. Americans avidly sought to learn about
the “white man’s burden” that they had taken up across the Pacific. Representations of
what British poet Rudyard Kipling called America’s “new-caught sullen peoples”
circulated in the metropole, peddled with appealingly visual titles such as Fighting in the
Philippines: Authentic and Original Photographs (1899) or Our Islands and Their People
as Seen with Camera and Pencil (1899). One of the first books to reach American
readers was The Philippine Islands and Their People, published in September 1898 by
Dean C. Worcester, identified on the book’s title page as an Assistant Professor of
Zoology at the University of Michigan.
2
Dean Conant Worcester, seated front and center, captioned this photograph:
“Our party and a group of Ilongote chiefs,” 1900.
Location: Dumabato, Isabela
[dw02d043] detail
Indeed, Worcester’s initial interests in the Philippines were biological, not political. Born
in rural Vermont in 1866, he first traveled to the Philippines in 1887 as a student
member of a University of Michigan bird-watching expedition led by his professor Joseph
Beal Steere. He returned in 1890 for another expedition in the company of Frank L.
Bourns, a fellow scientist and photographer. Not content to record the local bird life, the
two men traveled to the most remote regions of the islands, meeting hunters and
farmers, warriors and fishermen, all of them subjects for Worcester’s camera.
Dean Worcester’s rapid rise in 1898 from zoologist to colonial kingmaker was a mix of
expertise, happenstance, gumption, and connection. He was, in part, in the right place
at the right time: when the Spanish-American War began in April 1898, few Americans
had ever even been to the Philippines, let alone had any expertise about the place,
ornithological or otherwise. In the space of just a few weeks, Worcester turned his
letters home into a published book—one of the first to reach American readers, and
definitely the most lavishly illustrated.
One of Worcester’s readers may have been President William McKinley, who invited
Worcester to meet with him at the White House in December 1898. McKinley appointed
Worcester to the Philippine Commission, the first institution of civil government in the
country, from 1899 to 1901. Worcester went on to serve as secretary of the interior of
the Philippines from 1901 to 1913, and—with only a few interruptions for travel in the 3
United States—would spend the rest of his life in the Philippines. But it was those 14
years of colonial service that mattered most for Worcester, for the U.S. colonial
government, and for the ways that the state visualized the Philippine Islands and their
people.
Dean Worcester loved cameras. He had begun taking photographs as a young man, and
by the time he left for Manila on the Empress of Japan in January 1899, he was a
capable photographer who entertained himself aboard ship by taking group shots and
tinkering with his camera.
Worcester included himself (seated far left) in this group photograph with
“members of the first Philippine Commission and staff” while at sea in 1899.
Within a few years, Worcester had amassed considerable power in the colonial
administration, incorporating into his portfolio as secretary of the interior responsibility
for a wide range of undertakings: health, forestry, public lands, agriculture, weather,
mining, government laboratories, and non-Christian tribes. As part of his official duties,
Worcester regularly traveled through the 7,000 islands of the Philippine archipelago and
met with some of the country’s 10 million inhabitants. On his investigations, he always
brought along his own camera or hired a photographic assistant. Worcester praised
4
Charles Martin, his favorite photographic assistant, for having “made a large series of
valuable negatives which afford a permanent photographic record of conditions at
present obtaining among many of the non-Christian tribes of the archipelago and of
their manners and customs.” [1]
Most of the Filipinos Dean Worcester interacted with during his career as a
colonial official were urban, Spanish-speaking elites such as those seen above.
Worcester took relatively few photographs of these men and women known as
“ilustrados” (from the Spanish word for enlightened).
5
In addition to the non-Christian groups that fascinated Worcester, he also
photographed groups he labeled as “Spaniards” and “Spanish-German
Mestizos,” here six young women.
6
In the Philippines, Worcester encountered a substantial Chinese minority
population. But he appears to have spent very little time photographing the
ethnic Chinese or their neighborhoods.
[dw39b012] detail
7
Taken as a whole, the Worcester Collection does not evenly represent the ethnic
diversity and cultures of the Philippines in the early-20th century. By contrast, it clearly
reflects Worcester’s preoccupation with classifying the “primitive” racial types that he
encountered in the mountain highlands and distant islands. Despite his day-to-day
interactions with urban Filipinos, Worcester took the overwhelming majority of his
photographs in the most remote regions of the Philippines.
No one told Dean Worcester to collect these photographs, but the adventure of travel,
the technical challenge and excitement of camera work, and the documentary evidence
that it produced must have appealed to Worcester’s larger-than-life personality and
outsized physical presence. With the authority he held as head of the Philippine Bureau
of Science, Worcester set out to amass thousands of photographs of people and places
in America’s new colony. The Bureau of Science, which Cameron Forbes, another
American colonial official, described as “a great science library serving as a storehouse
of knowledge not only for the Philippines, but for much of the East,” took its camera
work seriously. As Forbes noted, “[i]f a photograph were needed, this bureau not only
took it, but filed it away so that it might be available in years to come.” [2]
Worcester’s motives were simultaneously scholarly and political. “Now that the
Philippine islands are definitely ours,” wrote anthropologist Daniel Brinton in 1899, “it
behooves us to give them that scientific investigation which alone can afford a true
guide to their proper management. … [A] thorough acquaintance with the diverse
inhabitants of the archipelago should be sought by everyone interested in its
development.” [3] Dean Worcester took up the challenge of documenting the diversity of
the Philippines, with the goal of both understanding the Filipino people and learning how
to govern them.
Worcester focused his attention on the most rural groups. “[T]here are probably no
regions in the world,” he later explained, “where … there dwell so large a number of
distinct peoples as are to be found in northern Luzon and in the interior of Mindanao.” [4]
A catalogue of his collection arranged by ethnic group shows a preponderance of images
taken among mountain-dwelling Igorots and Tingian Islanders, and relatively few
images taken of urban Ilocanos and Tagalogs.
Using Worcester’s photographs along with maps and documents, American officials
began to chart the new colony’s ethnic landscape. But their scholarly confusion showed
the impossibility of their undertaking; in 1900, Dean Worcester asserted that the
population of the Philippines included three “races” and 84 “tribes,” while three years
later the Philippine census counted 24 tribes—eight of them “civilized” and 16 of them
“wild.” [5] The world that Dean Worcester mapped was at least partly a landscape that
he himself had imagined.
9
Map titled “Races and Tribes of the Philippines,” from Herbert W. Krieger,
Peoples of the Philippines (1942). Dean Worcester’s efforts to map the ethnic
landscape of the Philippines shaped American anthropological knowledge of the 10
region for decades. In 1942, when the Smithsonian Institution published a series
titled War Background Studies, Herbert W. Krieger drew this map based on
Worcester’s earlier reports.
In a memoir written at the end of his career, Worcester reflected on his time with the
Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes.
At the outset we did not so much as know with certainty the names of the
several wild and savage tribes. … As I was unable to obtain reliable
information concerning them on which to base legislation for their control
and uplifting, I proceeded to get such information for myself by visiting
their territory, much of which was quite unexplored. [6]
The spirit of adventure and exploration that had brought the young man to the
Philippines in the 1880s had become a technique of colonial governance. Worcester’s
fascination with the rural Philippines reflected his official role as head of the Bureau of
Non-Christian Tribes as well as the paternalism of empire and the romance of agrarian
lifestyles that he saw disappearing before the progress of Western civilization. When
comparing rural indigenous Philippine ethnic groups to urban Filipinos, Worcester noted
that:
[a]t present the pagan tribes consider themselves to be the ones who are
better off, and I am bound to say I believe they are right. [7]
Just as important as what Worcester and other colonial photographers saw through their
camera lenses is the question of how they looked through them in the first place.
11
THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL GAZE
Photography was a way of seeing the Philippines that emerged out of the political and
military needs of the U.S. colonial government. As such, it was part of a constellation of
governance techniques that included mapping, census taking, and cultural observation.
The photographs in the Worcester archive reflect the visual and cultural concerns of the
emerging social science of anthropology, a field that initially took as its subject the
study of so-called “primitive” societies. At the turn of the century, anthropology had
emerged as a professional field of study; scholars formed the American Anthropological
Association in 1902. But many of its practitioners were people like Dean Worcester,
amateur scholars who sought to document, analyze, and classify cultures in regions of
the world that were increasingly coming under colonial control.
Ethnography in the Philippines had begun in the 19th century as Spanish writer Pedro
Paterno and German Ferdinand Blumentritt traveled to the region. But these works were
almost completely unknown in the United States before 1898. In the Bureau of Science
and the Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes, founded in October 1901, Dean Worcester gave
ethnographic study an official home, charged to “conduct systematic investigations” [1].
Many of the images in the Worcester archive reflect a way of looking that is specific to
visual anthropology. How does a photographer look at his subjects when trying to
document a “race” or “tribe”? When an anthropologist looks through the camera lens,
what does he or she see? The anthropological gaze is first and foremost an act of
looking. Whether the photograph taken is a formally posed portrait or an instantaneous
snapshot, the photographer looks at his or her subject with a direct and intense gaze
that would generally be deemed impolite if no camera stood between them. The
distance between them makes the photographic subject into the other—the thing that is
to be photographed—but a necessary intimacy remains in the personal relationship
between the photographer and his or her subject.
12
“Yardstick” Photos
Dean Worcester does not appear to have engaged in the formal
anthropometric measurement that many professional
ethnographers used. Instead, Worcester and his fellow
photographers used juxtaposition in their photographs in order to
convey size, and sometimes even used their own bodies as
yardsticks. Such depictions of scale can be found throughout the
Worcester archive.
13
14
top left: top right:
Worcester caption: Worcester caption:
“Negrito man, type 1, and myself, to show “Negrito [wo]man, type 12, and myself
relative size,” 1901. showing relative size,” 1901.
Location: Mariveles, Bataan Location: Mariveles, Bataan
[dw001A002] [dw01A041]
To see Filipinos as specimens for scientific study, Worcester had to turn human societies
into laboratories.
15
These images from Dean Worcester’s collection convey his impulse to catalogue
and classify the Philippine culture around him, objectifying both people and
cultural artifacts in the process.
[dw07_grid]
In one image taken in 1901, Worcester posed a young woman and her child before a
white sheet draped to form a makeshift photo studio. Separated from her home, her
community, and even from the culture that her portrait was meant to represent, the
woman becomes an object of scientific scrutiny.
While Worcester and his team used a cloth backdrop in many photographs, many
images feature subjects in natural environments. The varying degrees of posed and
spontaneous scenes suggest additional complexities in the relationship between
observer and observed.
Worcester frequently 16
photographed his subjects in
front of a hastily draped white
sheet. This common
photographic technique helped
him take clearly-focused
pictures, but also had the effect
of separating his subjects from
their cultures and communities.
[dw01A098]
[dw03I012] detail
17
A white backdrop is apparent in this photo portraying Worcester’s colleagues
and Filipinos—“observers” and “observed.”
18
Worcester’s caption: “Hand of Tinguiane woman showing fresh tattoo,” 1908.
Location: (Old Tauit) Burayutan, Apayao
[dw06HH002]
The striking appearance of the young woman within the photographic frame
belies Worcester’s effort to depict a disembodied image of bodily ornamentation.
19
Many photographs in the Worcester collection document clothing, jewelry, and
headgear, or document “exotic” cultural practices.
Worcester’s caption: “Left arm of Manobo girl, type 5. Showing ornaments,” 1908.
Location: Bakua, Butuan
[dw13B010]
Photographs such as those in the Dean Worcester collection emerged from the practice
of anthropometry, the scientific definition of races by use of measurements of the
physical body. This effort drew on the latest techniques of criminology; indeed, the
mugshot had only emerged in European photography in 1883. For Worcester, and for
many of his readers back in the United States, such photographs were not only
scientifically sound, but on the technological cutting edge. For Worcester, who would
have been aware of the military and police uses of photography that were occurring in
this era, the blend of anthropology and criminology that these photographs represent
would have come as second nature.
20
Anthropology Meets the Mugshot
Observing Filipinos could also include measuring and documenting
their bodies, as with the images of these members of the Kalinga
tribe. Worcester frequently photographed his subjects seated in
front and side views to document their clothing, jewelry, and
hairstyles, but also to depict facial features that scholars would
have used to classify them into races. Part of the developing science
of anthropology, this photographic practice shared much with the
criminal mugshots that were also common in this era.
21
22
Top pair to bottom pair:
Worcester’s caption: “Kalinga man named Lauagan. This man followed us for three
days with a head axe, constantly sneaking behind us and undoubtedly seeking an
opportunity to kill us,” January 1905.
Location: Bunuan
[dw05a007] [dw05a008]
Worcester’s journeys brought him into close contact with rural Philippine tribes, and he
used his cameras to document the objects that he and other Americans found exotic
and intriguing. Examining these photographs of the “head-axe”—a weapon that was
typically used for hunting or harvesting but was sometimes used in the ritualized
warfare that Americans called “headhunting”—reveals some of the attraction that
violence and danger had for Worcester as he undertook his photographic work.
[dw05b004] detail
[dw05d027] detail
Worcester’s caption:
“Kalinga man named
Doget,”
January 1905
Island/Region: Cagayan.
Location: Pinakpook
[dw05d001]
25
Whether shown in the hands of a Filipino warrior or isolated against a
backdrop, images of the head-axe conveyed the romance and danger of
America’s colonial undertaking.
[dw06ee013] detail
26
Top left: Top right:
Worcester’s caption: Worcester’s caption:
“Three girls from Kapangan, types “Three girls from Kapangan,” 1907.
5, 6, and 7. Full length front views,” 1907. Location: Trinidad, Benguet
Location: Trinidad, Benguet [dw10L011]
[dw10L012]
Above right:
Above left: Worcester’s caption:
Worcester’s caption: “Kalinga woman, type 11.
“Kalinga woman,” 1901. Full length front view,” 1901.
Location: near Ilagan, Isabela Location: near Ilagan, Isabela
[dw05F030] [dw05f031]
27
Upper Left: Upper Right:
Worcester's caption: “Benguet Igorot girl, Worcester's caption: “Igorot woman,
type 19. Full length front view, reclining type 23. Reclining near stream,” 1904.
near stream,” 1904. Location: Baguio, Benguet
Location: Baguio, Benguet [dw10A181]
[dw10A071]
Lower Right:
Lower Left: Worcester's caption: “Benguet Igorot
Worcester's caption: “Benguet Igorot women, types 18 and 19 in bath,
women, types 18 and 19. Squatting on nude,” 1904.
bank of stream,” 1904. Location: Baguio, Benguet
Location: Baguio, Benguet [dw10A087]
[dw10A082]
We know little about how these images came to be staged or who was meant to see
them, but it is clear here that Worcester’s gaze had jumped from the documentary
impulse of the scientific photographer to the narrative imagination of the storyteller,
even as the unequal power relations of colonialism made these images possible.
28
29
Worcester’s caption: “Bontoc Igorots in automobile,” 1904. Location: Manila
[dw08A112] detail
COLONIAL COUNTERPOINT
The American colonial experience in the Philippines was full of contradictions, as officials
sought simultaneously to control the Filipinos and to engage and uplift them. Dean
Worcester cast himself as the nation’s leading expert on the Philippines, and took plenty
of credit for that work: “not one single measure for their betterment has ever been
proposed by anyone but myself,” he insisted in a letter to Secretary of War William
Howard Taft in 1908. [1] Dean Worcester’s mixed motives appear in his photographic
collection, which combined romance and condescension. Worcester’s official job as head
of the Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes was to defend indigenous Filipinos; he found
himself committed to changing Filipinos’ ways of life even as he wished them to stay
frozen in time. Ultimately, the only way he could imagine to protect them was to put
them—and their culture—into a museum.
30
In addition to taking photographic images, Worcester and his colleagues also
recorded Filipino voices. But visual accounts of Filipinos using Western
technologies—as in this image of a phonograph—often suggested the cultural
inferiority of Filipinos.
31
Depictions of rural Filipinos encountering American colonial officials often
showed Filipinos awed by western technology, juxtaposing two ways of life, one
marked as advanced, the other as backward.
Book illustration and caption: “Entertaining the Kalingas. They are listening with
great interest to the reproduction of a speech which one of their chiefs has just made
into the receiving horn of a dictaphone.” from Dean C. Worcester, The Philippines Past
and Present (New York: Macmillan, 1914), vol. 1, p. 464.
[PPP_v1_dictaphone]
Through institutions such as schools, churches, workshops, and military training camps,
American colonial officials sought to transform Filipinos. The institutions that aimed at
uplifting Filipinos taught them not about their own culture, but that of the Americans:
teaching English rather than Philippine languages, celebrating the Fourth of July rather
than the outlawed Philippine national holidays, and decorating classrooms with portraits
of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
32
Colonial officials such as Dean Worcester boasted of the civilizing effect of
American education. American flags decorate this classroom in the northeastern
province of Isabela. Display of the Philippine flag had been outlawed a few years
earlier.
Worcester’s caption: “Group of Ilocano and Gad-Dane school boys, with their
American teachers,” 1905. Location: Echague, Isabela
[1898_AmAnthopologist_p300_p303]
The colonial military was among the most transformative institutions. Its two main
branches, the Philippine Scouts and Philippine Constabulary began as temporary military
expedients during the Philippine-American War, as American officers sought to suppress
the insurgency by recruiting men from some ethnic groups to fight as soldiers against
others. But in the years after the war, colonial officials touted the value of the Scouts
and the Constabulary as schools for citizenship. Frederick Chamberlin, an American
journalist, wrote that “[n]ext to baseball, many are inclined to believe that the
constabulary is the most active single civilizing agent in our administration.” [2]
33
Images such as this pair of
photographs—in which a
Constabulary soldier is
photographed “in uniform”
and “without uniform”
—helped Worcester show the
transformation of tribal
Filipinos through military
service.
[dw08A055]
[dw08A054]
34
In the following series of three photographs, which Dean Worcester noted were
evidence of the transformation of “old school” Igorot warriors into “new school” soldiers.
He arranged photographs in specific ways to tell a story of colonial uplift.
35
Worcester identified this 1903 series “Bontoc Igorot warriors of the old school
and new school.” Showing the men first in traditional dress with shields and
spears, and then in U.S. military uniforms, the series boasts of the elimination of
their traditional Filipino ways of life.
1903. Location: Bontoc
[dw08A051] [dw08A052] [dw08A053]
36
As his tenure as a colonial administrator continued, Worcester traveled to remote
regions of the Philippines on almost-yearly tours, but as he grew more comfortable in
his government offices in Manila, his travels were shorter, more ritualized, attended by
an ever-larger retinue of colonial officials, and restricted to ceremonial encounters with
tribal chiefs. The photographic record reveals these visits less as cultural exchanges and
close observations, but public spectacles. They were increasingly staged performances
of a way of life that was already disappearing.
Colonial officials went to great lengths to teach Filipinos Western athletic games,
such as this foot race with an American flag (on left) at the finish line. At the
same time, they suppressed Philippine popular sports.
37
The traditions behind tribal cultures were suppressed, but the spectacle was not.
This image of war games in the southern Sulu archipelago shows how U.S.
officials such as Dean Worcester could look with approval on Filipino traditions,
but only when they were confined to ceremonial performances.
Worcester went out of his way to document styles of dress. Even under Spanish rule,
rural Filipinos moved between traditional and Western styles of dress. Anthropologist
Albert Jenks noted that among the Tingian people, “[t]he men commonly wear only the
breech-cloth, though they usually possess trousers and shirts which may be worn on
festival occasions.” [3] Worcester noted in his diary that “most of the Igorrote headmen
had coats of white or blue or other color (frequently a khaki coat they had got off a
soldier) and some of them also wore trousers of remarkable patterns.” [4] Whether for
soldiers or schoolchildren, clothing was a powerful marker of progress toward
“civilization,” and the Dean Worcester collection documents the importance of clothing
in a narrative of colonial uplift.
38
Paired images such as these sought to use clothing as markers of cultural
progress, favorably comparing “Sunday clothes” with “every-day clothes.” But
sometimes images told different stories than the narratives of civilization in their
captions. On closer examination, these men did not look very different in their
Sunday dress than their everyday clothes.
Worcester’s caption: “Bukidnon women dancing in the street to welcome us,” 1909.
Location: Impalutao, Bukidnon
[dw11I006] detail
But the women of Bukidnon had clearly learned that civilization required putting away
their traditional clothes, even if they brought them out for special occasions “to show
that they had them.” If the anthropological gaze sought to turn a “primitive” society into
a laboratory in order to study it, sometimes it was too successful. Increasingly,
traditional indigenous Philippine cultures were being turned into a museum—displaying
clothes that people no longer wore.
40
Even as Bukidnon women chose their clothes to please Worcester, they also knew
of his interest in traditional Philippine cultures. These women displayed an older
costume during his ceremonial visit, but did not wear it “lest they displease” the
Americans.
Worcester’s caption: “One of the dummies at the foot of the arch shown in 11j003. The
people were afraid to wear these clothes lest they displease us,
but wanted to show that they had them,” 1909.
Location: Kalasungay, Bukidnon
[dw11J004] detail
41
42
RECASTING “NATIVES”
Dean Worcester’s images of the Philippines circulated widely in the United States, from
the halls of Capitol Hill in Washington to the St. Louis World’s Fair of 1904 to the parlors
of middle-class Americans. As they circulated, the images changed—and even when
they didn’t, the changing contexts of their presentation told new stories about the
American colonial experience. Photographic images moved from the darkroom to the
printed pages of official state documents, most notably with the publication in 1905 of
the Census of the Philippine Islands. Here the surveillance powers of the state that had
been so crucial in pacifying the islands now joined with the documenting, collecting, and
classifying impulses of the anthropological gaze.
43
In this 1905 photograph, E. Y. Miller, an officer in the U.S. Army and the colonial
governor of the Palawan province, holds on his lap a Moro child. The boy was
the son of Datu Batarosa, a powerful local chief with whom Miller would have
worked on a regular basis.
Worcester’s caption: “Moro boy, type 1. Son of Datu Batarasa,
with Governor E. Y. Miller,” 1905. Location: Bona-Bona, Palawan
[dw23A003]
44
A photo of the same boy with
other children in the background
creates a different impression.
[dw23A001]
[Sec_Int_1910]
National Geographic caption: “A MORO BOY. The son of Dato Bata Rosa seated on
the knee of Captain E. G. Miller [sic], who lost his life while serving as Governor of
Palawan. The Moros are found in their greatest strength in the Island of Mindanao and
the Sulu Archipelago. They are unexcelled pirates and slave traders, treacherous and
unreliable to the last degree. The whole race numbers about 300,000, has never been
brought under complete control and its pacification presents one of the most difficult
problems before the Philippine government.”
[ng1189_1913_Nov_27]
Worcester as Storyteller
Like most colonial officials, Worcester returned regularly to the United States. By 1913,
he had hired a booking agent who arranged paid lectures across the country. During his
two-year tour, Worcester’s images reappeared as lantern slides (sometimes 46
hand-colored), projected in public auditoriums as a backdrop to Worcester’s own
booming voice that spoke with great authority about the colonial project. In December
1913 and January 1914, Worcester packed Carnegie Hall with a series of lectures on
such topics as “The Picturesque Philippines” and “Wild Tribes of the Philippines.” The
New York Times praised the lectures for including both photographs and films:
Worcester’s visual extravaganza wowed not only the crowds at his lectures, but
government officials as well. One of the final stops on Dean Worcester’s U.S. speaking
tour was in Washington, D.C., where he appeared before the Senate Committee on the
Philippines. His testimony was both oral and visual: on December 30, 1914, he lectured
the senators for two hours in a darkened committee room illuminated by the glow of his
lantern slides.
Old / New
As the photographs that Dean Worcester and others took in the Philippines were
collected, sorted, and circulated throughout the United States, one style emerged as a
visual habit that shows the power of photography as its anthropological aims were put
to storytelling ends. Published works about the Philippines—by Dean Worcester or
others—regularly featured images of transformation, both of the Philippine landscape
and its inhabitants: a paved road replaces a meandering footpath; a modern
schoolhouse stands next to a thatch-roofed hut; a long-haired boy returns as a white-
suited man. The visual trope of sequential transformation was among the most popular
ways of depicting America’s colonial enterprise, appearing in books, magazines, and
even in official government reports.
47
The caption of the frontispiece to Worcester’s 1914 book reads:
“The Metamorphosis of a Bontoc Igorot. Two photographs of a Pit-a-pit, a
Bontoc Igorot boy. The second was taken nine years after the first.”
48
The text explains that the man became a doctor. By including the contrasting
images of a barefoot boy and a white-suited man as the first pictures in his book,
Dean Worcester presented images as evidence of the achievements of the colonial
project.
captions:
top: “The Old Way of
Crossing a River.”
Dean C. Worcester,
The Philippines Past
and Present (1914).
[dw_ppp_v2_006]
49
captions:
top: “Old-style Road across
Lowlands. Tracks of this sort
become completely impassable
during the rainy season.”
Dean C. Worcester,
The Philippines Past
and Present (1914).
[dw_ppp_v2_004]
Bakidan
Bakidan was a Kalinga chief whom Worcester knew well from his
travels in the mountains of Luzon. Over time, however, as
Worcester published accounts of his time in the Philippines,
descriptions of his relationship to Bakidan changed from depictions
that highlighted close and personal relations to stories that erased
Bakidan’s individuality and highlighted his tribal and “savage”
identity.
50
This photograph of
Bakidan, a Kalinga chief,
was taken in 1905 during
an extended stay by
Worcester in the village of
Bunuan in the northern
Philippines.
Worcester’s caption:
“Kalinga man named
Bakidan, type 1. Half length
front view,” 1905
Location: Bunuan, Cagayan
[dw23A001]
[PPP_v1_Bakidan]
51
Taken during his 1905 journey to Bunuan, this photograph shows Bakidan
(highlighted in red) with three other chiefs, and, at the center, Worcester and
Colonel Villamor. These four chiefs appear elsewhere in Worcester’s
photographic collection, but not identified as chiefs or brothers.
Worcester’s caption: “Blas Villamor, Bakidan, Saking, and two other brothers of
Bakidan, and myself. There are six brothers in this family and they rule the upper
Nabuagan River valley. Bakidan is the most powerful,” 1905.
Location: Bunuan, Cagayan
[dw05A010]
52
In his 1914 book, Worcester depicted his trip to the Kalinga as a journey “In
Hostile Country” rather than a visit to a leading local politician. Worcester
noted that “the four chiefs were not as yet ready to lay down their shields or
head-axes.”
Book caption: “In Hostile Country. Colonel Villamor and the author at Bakidan’s
place in the Kalinga country. The four chiefs were not as yet ready to lay down their
shields or head-axes.”
[dw05A010]
Sometimes the images in the Dean Worcester collection were simplified or altered by
Worcester to serve his own political ends—he took them for political purposes, of
course. But Worcester—a politician, anthropologist, scientist, and photographer—was
unique. Sometimes images of Filipinos were used by other authors and publishers,
many of whom had little connection to the Philippines and felt less compunction about
playing fast and loose with the photographic record. Consider the following depiction of
the “educational value of the constabulary,” published in Frederick Chamberlin’s The
Philippine Problem, 1898–1913 (1913).
53
This sequence of photographs was published in the 1910s both in a government
report and a popular account of U.S. Philippine policy. At first glance, the series
appears to tell a story of benevolent colonialism by tracing the transformation of
a soldier after “a year in jail.” But the photographic archive suggests a more
complicated history.
[Chamberlin_Feb_03_000005_EdConst]
This sequence was a famous image of U.S. colonialism in the Philippines, depicted in
government documents and popular publications. But when we trace the narrative back
from the printed page to the moment of photographic encounter, the story gets more
complicated. Worcester’s notes and archives tell a different story of transformation, in
which he took four different photographs in 1901, and only arranged them much later in
a sequence with a narrative of colonial uplift.
[dw08A026]
Worcester’s caption:
“Bontoc Igorot man, type 5.
2/3 length profile view,” 1901.
Location: Manila, Manila
[dw08A028]
55
The front view of this man, clearly taken
at the same time as the middle picture
above, allows his face to be seen.
Worcester’s caption:
“Bontoc Igorot man, type 5.
Half length front view,” 1901.
Location: Manila, Manila
[dw08A027]
Worcester’s caption:
“Bontoc Igorot man, type 5.
After a year in jail.
Half length profile view,” 1901.
Location: Bontoc, Bontoc
[dw08A029]
56
In his diary for June 21, 1901, Worcester
noted that “Francisco had on a full rig of
cloths [sic]—white coat, trousers made
out of a pair of miner’s Alaska drawers,
army leggings and American shoes,”
closely matching this image of a
constabulary uniform (above). But in
Manila that June, Worcester also
photographed Francisco in a more
“primitive” state (right).
Worcester’s caption:
“Bontoc Igorot man, type 5.
Called Francisco.
Half length front view,” 1901.
Location: Manila
[dw08A025]
These images show the power of photographic manipulation, and cause us to ask why
an author might have wanted to shuffle photographs in service of a good story. But they
also make us wonder whether Dean Worcester was not so much a puppet-master but
also entranced by his own narrative of colonial control and uplift. Evidence suggests that
he only put the images into this narrative in a government report in 1910, but that he
used the images quite often afterward, even in his congressional testimony in 1914,
when he told Congress that “I will show you the evolution of the first Bontoc soldier who
ever enlisted…. This man is a chief named ‘Francisco,’ dressed as he had been when I
first saw him. [indicating] This slide shows how he looked a year after, after he had
been in contact with the Americans.” [3] Colonial storytelling was a complicated matter
that was never entirely under the storytellers’ control.
The blend of the scientific and the touristic, the official and the private that marked
colonial Philippine photography reached its apotheosis in the pages of National
Geographic, the iconic magazine that brought the world to the parlors of Victorian
America. Founded in 1888, the National Geographic Society initially found few readers
for its dry and scholarly publications. But subscriptions to The National Geographic
Magazine skyrocketed after the U.S. embarked on overseas colonization, and a
revolution in printing technology enlivened the pages with photographs—many of them
painstakingly tinted and reproduced in full color. Articles on the Philippines appeared
with regularity after 1898—over 30 were published between 1898 and 1908—and
photographs from Dean Worcester’s collection illustrated many of them.
The connections between Worcester’s entourage and the National Geographic Society
were thick and deep: photographer Charles Martin, who appears often in Worcester
Collection photographs (he took many of them as well) became head of the NGS
57
Photographic Laboratory in 1915 after he left the U.S. Army.
In the pages of the magazine, Worcester shared his familiar stories of colonial uplift,
and readers delighted at the array of images that illustrated his articles. His
photographic essays were not without controversy, however; a 1903 article by another
author that depicted bare-breasted Filipina women prompted debate among the
magazine’s editors about its propriety. Worcester made a claim for the images’ scientific
value, won the argument, and revolutionized the magazine’s editorial practices.
In November 1913,
National Geographic juxtaposed the
familiar and the exotic in an article by
Dean Worcester, with a run of
hand-colored photographic illustrations
of rural Filipinos.
58
The title of Dean Worcester’s article:
“The Non-Christian Peoples of the
Philippine Islands
With an Account of What Has Been
Done for Them under American Rule”
59
Thumbnails show the layout of the photographs selected and colorized for
Worcester’s article.
60
Presenting “Peoples”
Through his text and images—carefully hand-colored by National
Geographic staffers—Dean Worcester conveyed to a mass audience
of American readers his sense of the racial landscape of the
Philippines and boasted of “what has been done for them under
American rule.” The images selected for his November 1913 National
Geographic article introduced appealing figures representing tribes
rather than individuals; vibrant colors accentuated the sense of the
exotic for American readers.
61
“Mangyans” (above) and “Ilongot Woman and Girls”
[ng1178-1179_Nov1913]
62
“A Negrito” (top left); “A Tagakaolo” (top right)
“A Lubuagan Igorot Woman” (bottom two images)
[ng1180-1181_Nov1913]
63
“Tiruray Women” (top)
“A Tingian Girl” (bottom left); “A Tingian Girl in Mourning” (bottom right)
[ng1184-1185_Nov1913]
64
“An Ilongot Family” (left) and “Wild Tinglians of Apayao” (right)
[ng1186-1187_Nov1913]
65
“A Tingian Man” (left) and “A Moro Boy” (right)
[ng1188-1189_Nov1913]
66
LOOKING & LOOKING BACK
The U.S. imperial agenda that emerged from the Spanish-American War in 1898 was
always controversial and critics of American colonial policy continued to voice their
concerns. Many focused their attention on Dean Worcester, a vigorous supporter of U.S.
policy in the Philippines and temperamentally one of the most divisive figures in the
islands. James H. Blount, a vocal anti-imperialist, questioned Dean Worcester’s
pretensions to scientific authority and mocked him for “discovering, getting acquainted
with, classifying, tabulating, enumerating, and otherwise preparing for salvation, the
various non-Christian tribes.” Blount felt that Worcester used photography to
manipulate both Filipino subjects and American readers, trying to convince both groups
that the Philippines was unprepared for political independence. “Professor Worcester,”
he wrote, “is the P.T. Barnum of the ‘non-Christian tribe’ industry.” [1]
We know very little about the men and women who sat for Dean Worcester’s camera.
Most of them could not read or write, and so a century later we are left to decipher their
emotions and motivations from the images themselves.
Many of the images feature defiant resistance, sullenness, evasion, even obvious
boredom; a stubborn refusal to look at the photographer; or a testy stare directly back
at the camera and the political power that it embodied. There were few options for the
residents of the hill tribes who posed for Worcester and his companions, but the
photographs show their efforts to act, even within that limited range.
67
We know little about what the men and women who sat for Worcester’s
photographs thought about the experience. We do know that some opposed his
efforts, and in images such as this, it is possible to imagine how resistance,
boredom, or testiness might have made their way into the photographic archive.
[dw04B001]
Some responded well, and evidence shows that Worcester’s photo-making was often a
collaborative undertaking. In his diary on February 7, 1901, he wrote that he “Made one
print from each negative before breakfast in order to show them to the Igorrotes,”
suggesting a willingness to engage in dialogue with his photographic subjects. The next
day, he noted in his diary that he had “Made prints of negatives before breakfast, so as
to give them to the Igorrotes, who were much pleased with them.” [2]
But from Worcester’s own writings, we know that some Filipinos did not appreciate his
efforts to photograph them, and sometimes his relationships with sitters were less
egalitarian.
68
“This girl was badly frightened,” Worcester noted in
reference to the photo on the left.
[dw08C008]
Worcester occasionally used deception to get hold of his photographs. Attending a Moro
wedding in one of his early voyages in the early 1890s, he noted:
[w]e were very anxious to get pictures of the guests, and that evening
smuggled in our dismounted camera, together with some magnesium
powders and a flashlight lamp. Under pretext of contributing our share to
the entertainment, we showed them how to make artificial lightning. Bourns
focussed by guess, I touched off magnesium powders, and in this way we
made a number of exposures, only two of which gave us negatives that
would print. [3]
69
Worcester’s blurry photograph appears below.
Worcester’s caption: “Interior of a Moro house with a woman and girls in the
foreground,” 1891. Location: Jolo, Sulu
[dw23D029]
Filipinos also resisted Worcester’s Kodak by using the limited powers that were available
to them in the political arena. In 1907, in an effort to co-opt political opposition in the
islands and to delegate some of the routine tasks of governance, the U.S. established
the Philippine Assembly, a legislative body based on extremely limited voting rights. On
numerous occasions, the Filipino elites who dominated the Assembly used that forum to
object to the visual representations of the Philippines that circulated around the world in
publications like National Geographic. In 1914, the Assembly took a remarkable step
and voted to outlaw “the taking, exhibiting, or possession of photographs of naked
Filipinos” on the ground that these images “tended to make it appear that the
Philippines were inhabited by people in the nude.” [4]
The legislators in Manila were hardly friends of the rural highland Filipinos on whose
behalf they claimed to speak—in fact, they may have been embarrassed that images of
“uncivilized tribes” stood in for the Philippines as a whole in the visual record upon
which Americans gazed. Journalist Vicente Ilustre wrote in 1914 criticizing Worcester for
showing images of “these unfortunates.” [5] 70
Filipinos’ efforts to control the camera’s power drew a rebuke from Dean Worcester. In
testimony before Congress in 1914, Worcester told the Senate:
[w]e have twice had bills passed … intended to make it a criminal offense
for any person to take a photograph of those fellows up in the hills. The
Filipinos want to conceal the very fact of the existence of such people.
There has been agitation in favor of the destruction of the whole series of
Government negatives showing the customs of the non-Christian people,
the conditions which we found among them and the conditions which prevail
today.” [6]
The proposed bill never became a law. Through most of the colonial period, legislation
required the approval of the Philippine Commission (on which Dean Worcester served)
or the governor-general, and calls for modesty in rural photography were outvoted by
an insistence on the value of the images for ethnographic research. The shape-shifting
of visual anthropology—at once political surveillance, savage romance, and colonial
fantasy, always cloaked under the gaze of science—allowed it to elude the attacks of
critics.
Looking Back
The photographic encounters between Worcester and his sitters range from friendly and
easygoing to violent and unwilling. But the collection is massive and among its images
are striking views of men and women who lived through revolution, war, and colonialism
at the turn of the century and looked back at the camera in ways that capture our
attention today, reminding us that the photographic archive is never completely at the
mercy of the storyteller.
71
[dw01h007]
72
[dw08f006]
73
[dw11d004]
74
[dw08c001]
75
[dw03j015]
76
[dw02d018]
77
[dw05g002]
78
[dw05k004]
79
[dw06cc002]
80
[dw08d002]
Closing up Shop
Dean Worcester never stopped taking photographs, but in the final years of his life he
no longer took them in an official capacity. In 1913, President Woodrow Wilson and the
Democrats took office and promised a new departure for America’s Philippine policy;
longtime colonial officials—most of them known to be Republicans and devotees of
former presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft—found themselves out
of jobs. Worcester offered his resignation in September 1913 and by the 1920s had
moved to the province of Bukidnon in the southern Philippines, where he tried his hand
as a ranch owner.
81
By the time Worcester left government service in 1913, the camera was ubiquitous in
the Philippines. It was no longer the sole property of colonial officers. Photographic
images were part of the day-to-day experience of American colonial officials, and they
increasingly surrounded Filipinos as well. As a global consumer culture increasingly
penetrated Southeast Asia, photo studios popped up along the streets of Manila’s
fashionable shopping districts, and photographers soon set up shop in small towns
throughout the colony. Filipinos increasingly took their own photographs, depicting their
own lives and communities away from the gaze of colonial officials. In fact, there was
decreasing interest in photographic accounts of the Philippines, and after Worcester’s
departure, little support for ethnographic study of the colony. The Bureau of
Non-Christian Tribes closed in the 1930s, and Worcester’s photo collection was donated
to the Museum of Natural History in New York City, and then transferred to the
University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
Meanwhile, viewed from a century’s distance, the photographs in the Dean Worcester
Collection teach us invaluable lessons: foremost, they underline the need to consider
the power relations in any visual encounter, but particularly in those interactions that
take place on a visual terrain marked by inequalities of status, gender, and race.
Second, these photographs remind us to pay attention to the circulation of such images.
Even a century later, they must be handled with respect for the people and the cultures
they depict.
But perhaps the final lesson is that these photographs teach no easy lessons. As viewers
scrutinize these images, wondering what was going through the minds of Dean
Worcester and other photographers, wondering how these images were collected and
circulated, wondering what it was like to sit for such a photograph or to come across it
later—we must tread carefully, forego the impulse of the snapshot and its easy
legibility, and start to look in new and more egalitarian ways.
[dw01h007]
Unmarried Negrito woman, type 4. Half length front view. 1900
Location: Dolores, Pampanga
[dw08f006]
Young Lubuagan man, type 4. Half length front view, sitting. 1908
Location: Lubuagan, Bontoc
[dw11d004]
Bukidnon man, type 2. 1/2 length front view, sitting. 1907
Location: Nanca, Bukidnon
[dw08c001]
Bontoc Igorot, type 1. The Presidente of Mayinit, holding his child. 1903
Location: Mayinit, Bontoc
[dw03j015]
Mangyan girl, type 7. Full length side view, squatting. 1906 82
Location: Bonganay, Mindoro
[dw02d018]
Ilongote woman, type 12. Half length front view. 1900
Location: Dumabato, Isabela
[dw05g002]
Kalinga man, type 2. Called Captain Sabaoay. Guided two military expeditions sent to
capture Aguinaldo. Half length front view. 1905
Location: Salecsec, Bontoc
[dw05k004]
Kalinga woman, type 3. 2/3 length front view. 1906
Location: Dalig, Isabela
[dw06cc002]
One of the three chiefs of Masimut, type 3. Front view, sitting. 1905
Location: Masimut, Cagayan
[dw08d002]
Old man. Full length front view. Type 1. 1907
Location: Talubin, Bontoc
83
NOTES | SOURCES | CREDITS
After Dean Worcester’s death in 1924 and the closure of the Bureau of Non-Christian
Tribes in the 1930s, the photographs in his collection—taken by Worcester, Frank
Bourns, Charles Martin, and other anonymous photographers—were returned to the
United States and now are held by the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology.
6. Worcester, Dean C. The Philippines Past and Present (New York: Macmillan, 1930), p.
89.
2. Chamberlin, Frederick. The Philippine Problem, 1898-1913 (Boston: Little, Brown &
Company, 1913), p. 159.
4. Dean C. Worcester, June 17, 1901 diary entry, quoted in Mark Rice, “His Name Was
Don Francisco Muro: Reconstructing an Image of American Imperialism,” American
Quarterly 62 (March 2010), p. 60.
1. “Calls Wild Men Our Wards,” New York Times, December 31, 1913, p. 7.
2. Dean C. Worcester, February 6, 1901 diary entry, quoted in Mark Rice, “His Name
Was Don Francisco Muro: Reconstructing an Image of American Imperialism,” American
Quarterly 62 (March 2010): p. 58.
1. Blount, James H. The American Occupation of the Philippines, 1898-1912 (New York:
G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912), pp. 573-578.
2. Dean C. Worcester, quoted in Mark Rice, “His Name Was Don Francisco Muro:
Reconstructing an Image of American Imperialism,” American Quarterly 62 (March
2010), p. 60.
3. Worcester, Dean C. The Philippine Islands and Their People (New York: Macmillan,
1898), pp. 192-197.
4. Kramer, Paul A. The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the
Philippines (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996), p. 375.
6. Dean C. Worcester, quoted in Rice, “His Name Was Don Francisco Muro,” p. 73.
85
SOURCES
Further Reading:
Beukers, Alan. Exotic Postcards: The Lure of Distant Lands (New York: Thames and
Hudson, 2007).
Brown, Michael F. Who Owns Native Culture? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
2003).
Lutz, Catherine A. and Jane L. Collins. Reading National Geographic (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1993).
Morris, Rosalind C. Photographies East: The Camera and Its Histories in East and
Southeast Asia. (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2009).
Pinney, Christopher. “Photos of the Gods”: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in
India (London: Reaktion Books, 2004).
Ryan, James R. Picturing Empire: Photography and the Visualization of the British
Empire (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).
Stephen, Ann, editor. Pirating the Pacific: Images of Trade, Travel and Tourism.
(Haymarket, NSW: Powerhouse Publishing, 1993).
De la Cruz, Enrique B. and Pearlie Rose Baluyut, editors. Confrontations, Crossings, and
Convergence: Photographs of the Philippines and the United States, 1898-1998 (Los
Angeles: UCLA Asian American Studies Center, 1998).
Folkmar, Daniel. Album of Philippine Types: Found in Bilibid Prison in 1903: Christians
and Moros (Including a Few Non-Christians) (Manila: Bureau of Public Printing, 1904).
Rafael, Vicente L. “White Love: Surveillance and Nationalist Resistance in the U.S.
Colonization of the Philippines.” In Cultures of United States Imperialism, Amy Kaplan
and Donald E. Pease, editors (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993), pp.
185-218.
86
Roces, Marian Pastor. “Old Photographs, Recuerdos Tristes.” Filipinas Journal 5 (1983),
pp. 113-124.
Dean Worcester
Rice, Mark. “His Name Was Don Francisco Muro: Reconstructing an Image of American
Imperialism.” American Quarterly 62 (March 2010), pp. 49-76.
Sinopoli, Carla M. and Lars Fogelin, editors and compilers. Imperial Imaginings: The
Dean C. Worcester Photograph Collection of the Philippines, 1890-1913 (Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, 1998).
Stanley, Peter W. “‘The Voice of Worcester Is the Voice of God’: How One American
Found Fulfillment in the Philippines.” In Reappraising an Empire: New Perspectives on
Philippine-American History, edited by Peter W. Stanley (Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1984), pp. 117-141.
Worcester, Dean C. The Philippine Islands and Their People (New York: Macmillan,
1898).
Worcester, Dean C. “Field Sports among the Wild Men of Northern Luzon.” National
Geographic 22 (March 1911), pp. 215-267.
Worcester, Dean C. The Philippines Past and Present (New York: Macmillan, 1914).
Online Resources:
Philippine Photography Archive. “The United States and Its Territories, 1870-1925: The
Age of Imperialism”
CREDITS
“Photography & Power in the Colonial Philippines ll” was developed by Visualizing
Cultures at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and presented on MIT
OpenCourseWare.
John W. Dower
Project Director
Emeritus Professor of History
Shigeru Miyagawa
Project Director
Professor of Linguistics
Kochi Prefecture-John Manjiro Professor of Japanese Language and Culture
Ellen Sebring
Creative Director
Scott Shunk
Program Director
Andrew Burstein
Media Designer
In collaboration with:
Christopher Capozzola
Author, essay
Associate Professor of History
MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences
SUPPORT
89