Disk Scheduling Algorithms: - Operating System Computer Mansi Mandaviya Mansi Karia 4 (

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Disk Scheduling algorithms

Subject:- Operating system


Branch : - Computer
Presented By : - Paresh Parmar
: - Mansi Mandaviya
: - Mansi Karia
Sem : - 4 (2016)
Branch:- Computer

(Government Engineering college ,


Bhavnagar) 1
 Disk Scheduling Algorithms are used to
reduce the total seek time of any
request.

 The operating system is responsible for


using hardware efficiently — for the disk
drives, this means having a fast access
time and disk bandwidth.
Disk Scheduling

 Access time has two major components


 Seek time is the time for the disk are to move the
heads to the cylinder containing the desired sector.
 Rotational latency is the additional time waiting for the
disk to rotate the desired sector to the disk head.
 Minimize seek time
 Seek time  seek distance
 Disk bandwidth is the total number of bytes transferred,
divided by the total time between the first request for
3
service and the completion of the last transfer.
Disk Scheduling (Cont.)
 Several algorithms exist to schedule the
servicing of disk I/O requests.
 We illustrate them with a request queue (0-
199).

98, 183, 37, 122, 14, 124, 65, 67

Head pointer 53
4
FCFS

Illustration shows total head movement of 640 cylinders.


5
SSTF
 Selects the request with the minimum seek
time from the current head position.
 SSTF scheduling is a form of SJF
scheduling; may cause starvation of some
requests.
 Illustration shows total head movement of
236 cylinders.

6
SSTF (Cont.)

7
SCAN
 The disk arm starts at one end of the disk,
and moves toward the other end, servicing
requests until it gets to the other end of the
disk, where the head movement is
reversed and servicing continues.
 Sometimes called the elevator algorithm.
 Illustration shows total head movement of
208 cylinders.
8
SCAN (Elevator)

9
C-SCAN
 Provides a more uniform wait time than SCAN.
 The head moves from one end of the disk to the
other. servicing requests as it goes. When it
reaches the other end, however, it immediately
returns to the beginning of the disk, without
servicing any requests on the return trip.
 Treats the cylinders as a circular list that wraps
around from the last cylinder to the first one.

10
C-SCAN (Cont.)

11
C-LOOK
 Version of C-SCAN
 Arm only goes as far as the last request in
each direction, then reverses direction
immediately, without first going all the way
to the end of the disk.

12
C-LOOK (Cont.)

13
Selecting a Disk-Scheduling Algorithm

 SSTF is common and has a natural appeal


 SCAN and C-SCAN perform better for systems that place
a heavy load on the disk.
 Performance depends on the number and types of
requests.
 Requests for disk service can be influenced by the file-
allocation method.
 The disk-scheduling algorithm should be written as a
separate module of the operating system, allowing it to be
replaced with a different algorithm if necessary.
 Either SSTF or LOOK is a reasonable choice for the 14
default algorithm.
Thank you....

You might also like