Ball Drop: Above The Floor. The Ball Hits The
Ball Drop: Above The Floor. The Ball Hits The
Ball Drop: Above The Floor. The Ball Hits The
Ball Drop
In this activity you will determine a numerical value for the magnitude of the acceleration due to
gravity and explore the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration for a freely falling object.
A ball is dropped from rest a distance yi above the floor. The ball hits the Release point
floor and bounces back up. The origin of the coordinate system (y = 0) is the
floor and the positive y direction points upward.
viy = 0 ; yi
+y
FLOOR y=0
PREDICT
Think about the motion you expect to occur in this experiment. Specifically, what will the
acceleration-time, velocity-time, and position-time graphs look like? Discuss these predictions with your
group members. Carefully sketch your predictions for the vertical acceleration (ay), vertical velocity
(vy), and vertical position (y) of the ball as functions of time on the grids located on the RESULTS page
of this Activity. The time axes are identical. Include a time interval long enough to include three bounces
from the floor.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A motion detector is used to measure the position of the ball as a function of time. The motion
detector emits short bursts of ultrasonic sound pulses and measures the time for a reflected pulse to
return to the detector. The detector then uses a programmed value for the speed of sound in air to
convert this time interval to a distance between the detector and the nearest object.
A long rod is attached to a table and a
Detector
Motion
ANALYZE - Qualitative
Locate and Copy the Ball Drop Fall 2020.cmbl experiment file to your computer double Click on it to
start. The computer should recognize the .cmbl extension as a Logger Pro file; if not, simply choose
Logger Pro from the Open with box.
On each graph, locate regions where
a) the ball is in contact with the ground.
b) the ball is moving vertically up.
c) the ball is moving vertically down.
On the “Ball Drop Results” page (located at end of this Activity), compare the measured graphs in this
experiment file with your predicted graphs. Describe how they are similar and how they are
different. Explain any discrepancies with your predicted graphs.
ANALYZE - Quantitative
A. Acceleration-Time Graph
• Select (drag across) a region of the Acceleration-Time graph when the ball is in free fall (between
two successive bounces the ACCELERATION IS CONSTANT).
ONLY ANALYZE THE PORTION OF THE CURVE WHERE THE ACCELERATION IS CONSTANT. DO NOT
SELECT THE ENTIRE GRAPH! It is also wise to use the longest length of free fall motion possible.
However, avoid using points in time directly before the ball appears to contact the ground or
appears to have just left the ground. Such points are likely to increase the uncertainty in the
analysis you are about to perform.
• Select Analyze->Statistics and record both the mean and the standard deviation in the mean
on the Ball Drop Results page (section A).
Your instructor may require you to show the region you have chosen before moving on.
The uncertainty in the slope is rounded to one significant figure (from 0.01986 to 0.02). Then
the value of the slope is written with the same precision as its uncertainty (the second decimal place
in this example). Thus, the value of the slope is written as
m (slope) = (-9.63 + 0.02) m/s2.
Once done, do NOT close the window with the curve fitting parameters.
ii) Using Analyze->Examine, determine the Velocity-Time coordinates for two points on the linear
portion of the graph by placing the cursor on the linear portion of the graph and recording the
coordinates displayed. The two points must correspond to data in the range you selected above.
Use the two data points to calculate the slope of the Velocity-Time graph. Record the data
points and show the calculation on the “Ball Drop Results” page (section B ii). Once done, do
NOT close the window with the curve fitting parameters.
Time
Velocity
Time
Position
Time
ANALYZE - Qualitative
Compare your measured graphs with your predicted graphs. Describe how they are similar and how
they are different. Explain any discrepancies in your predicted graphs.
ANALYZE - Quantitative
A. Acceleration-Time Graph
Record the acceleration and its uncertainty (use the standard deviation as the uncertainty). Use the
correct number of significant figures and correct units. Write the result in “proper form”.
• Record the vertical intercept and its uncertainty exactly as it appears in the parameter box:
Vertical intercept (b) =
Now write the vertical intercept and its uncertainty in “proper form” (uncertainty, correct number
of significant figures and correct units):
Vertical intercept (b) =
i) Using the fitting parameters from the Velocity-Time graph, write the acceleration of the ball
(and its uncertainty) while it is in free fall in proper form.
ii) Use Analyze->Examine to determine the coordinates of two points on the Velocity-Time graph
during which the ball is in free fall (between successive bounces). Use these coordinates to
calculate the acceleration of the ball while it is in free fall. Record the data points and show the
calculation below. Is the value reasonable compared to the value you found in part Bi) above?
C. Position-Time Graph (quadratic fit: y = At2 + Bt + C).
Write the coefficients and their uncertainty exactly as they appear in the parameter box:
Coefficient “A” =
Coefficient “B” =
Coefficient “C” =
Now write the coefficients in “proper form” (uncertainty, correct number of significant figures and
correct units)
Coefficient “A” =
Coefficient “B” =
Coefficient “C” =
i) Using the curve fitting parameters from the Position-Time graph, calculate the acceleration of the
ball (and its uncertainty) while it is in free fall. Write the result in “proper form”.
D. i) Compare the three values of the acceleration that you determined in parts A, Bi, and Ci. Are
they equal within experimental uncertainty (1 or 2 sigma)? If not, why not?
You must justify your answer by explicitly writing the range of values for each acceleration as
defined by their uncertainties.
ii) Are the measured accelerations equal to the gravitational acceleration g = 9.81 m/s2 within
experimental uncertainty? If not, why not?