Malicious Mischief
Malicious Mischief
Malicious Mischief
It is the willful damaging of another’s property for the sake of causing damage due to hate,
revenge or other evil motive.
1. Special Cases of Malicious Mischief (Art. 328) – As regards the means employed and the nature
of the damaged properties
2. Other Mischiefs (Art. 329)
3. Damage and Obstruction to means of communication (Art. 330) - As regards the means
employed and the nature of the damaged properties
4. Destroying or damaging statues, public monuments or paintings (Art. 331) - As regards the
means employed and the nature of the damaged properties
Any person who shall deliberately cause to the property of another any damage not falling
within the terms of the next preceding chapter.
Is it Malicious Mischief if the act of damaging to another’s property was inspired by mere pleasure of
destroying?
Yes.
NOTE: The crime of Malicious Mischief is not determined solely by the mere act of inflicting upon the
property of a third person, but it must be shown that the act had for its object, the injury of the property
merely for the sake of damaging it
It means not only loss but also diminution of what is a man’s own.
It is THEFT IF after damaging the property, the offender removes or makes use of the fruits or
objects of the damage
Damaging of property must not result from crime (Reason: Such damages are mere incidents of
the crime and as such may give rise only to civil liability)
May a person charged with malicious mischief be found guilty of damage to property through reckless
imprudence?
Yes. Since Reckless imprudence is not a crime itself but merely a way of committing it.
What are the Special Cases of Malicious Mischief? (Also called “Qualified Malicious Mischief
(Art. 328)
What are the Penalties of the Special Cases of Malicious Mischief? (Art. 328)
1. Prison Correcional in its minimum and medium periods – Value of the damage caused exceeds
P200,000.
2. Arresto Mayor – Value does not exceed P200,000 but is over P40,000
3. Arresto Menor – Value does not exceed P40,000
(As amended by R.A. No. 10951)
OTHER MISCHIEFS
1. Arresto Mayor in its medium and maximum periods – Value of the damage caused exceeds
P200,000.
2. Arresto Mayor in its minimum and medium periods – Value does not exceed P200,000 but is
over P40,000
3. Arresto Menor or fine not less than the value of the damage caused and not more than
P40,000– Value does not exceed P40,000 or cannot be estimated
(As amended by C.A. NO. 3999 and R.A. 10951)
DAMAGE AND OBSTRUCTION TO MEANS OF COMMUNICATION
What are the Penalties for Damage and Obstruction to means of communication? (Art. 330)
1. Prision Correcional in its medium and maximum periods – Any person who shall damage any
railway, telegraph or telephone lines
o Object of the offender is merely to cause damage
2. Prision Mayor – If the damage shall result in any derailment of cars, collision, or other accident,
without prejudice to the criminal liability of the offender for the other consequences of his
criminal act.
o The derailment of cars SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PURPOSELY SOUGHT for by the
offender. It must have resulted from damage to railway, telegraph or telephone lines.
Is Article 330 applicable when the telegraph or telephone lines do not pertain to railways?
No. Art. 330 applies to person who cuts telegraph or telephone wires BUT it must pertain to a
railway system
What crime is committed if as a result of the damage caused to railways, certain passengers of the
train are killed?
It depends.
If there is no intent to kill – Damages to means of communication with homicide (Art. 4 & 48)
If there is intent to kills and damaging the railways was the means to accomplish the criminal
purpose – Murder
What are the Penalties for Destroying or Damaging Statues, Public Monuments, or paintings?
(Art. 331)
1. Arresto Mayor in its medium period to Prision Correcional in its minimum period – To any
person who shall destroy or damage statues or any other useful ornamental public monuments
2. Arresto Menor or a fine not exceeding P40,000, or both such fine and imprisonment, in the
discretion of the court – To any person who shall destroy or damage any useful or ornamental
painting of a public nature.