Injectable Hydrogels For Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Injectable Hydrogels For Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Injectable Hydrogels For Cartilage and Bone Tissue
14
www.nature.com/boneres
REVIEW ARTICLE
Tissue engineering has become a promising strategy for repairing damaged cartilage and bone tissue. Among
the scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications, injectable hydrogels have demonstrated great potential for
use as three-dimensional cell culture scaffolds in cartilage and bone tissue engineering, owing to their high
water content, similarity to the natural extracellular matrix (ECM), porous framework for cell transplantation
and proliferation, minimal invasive properties, and ability to match irregular defects. In this review, we
describe the selection of appropriate biomaterials and fabrication methods to prepare novel injectable
hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. In addition, the biology of cartilage and the bony ECM is
also summarized. Finally, future perspectives for injectable hydrogels in cartilage and bone tissue
engineering are discussed.
Bone Research (2017) 5, 17014; doi:10.1038/boneres.2017.14; published online: 30 May 2017
INTRODUCTION clinical interest for patients with cartilage lesions and bone
Cartilage and subchondral bone damage can be caused defects.
by a variety of conditions, such as trauma, arthritis, and Tissue engineering, which emerged in the early 1990s,
sports-related injuries.1–4 It has been reported that 60% of has become one of the most commonly used approaches
patients examined by knee arthroscopy exhibit cartilage for cartilage and bone tissue reconstruction and regen-
damage, and ~ 15% of people over 60 years old have eration.19–22 Generally, an engineered tissue is composed
some clinical symptoms of such damage.5–6 In particular, of a scaffold, cells, and necessary growth factors.23–24
the self-healing of damaged cartilage is limited, owing to To fully reconstruct the damaged cartilage and bone
its lack of vascularization, innervation, lymphatic networks, tissue, it is important to synthesize biocompatible and
and progenitor cells.6–12 For bone tissue, despite its high biodegradable scaffolds that mimic the native features of
vascularization, commonly used techniques for repair, such the specific tissue, successfully transport cells and growth
as autografting and allografting, are limited because of factors to the damaged tissue, and provide support to the
risks of donor-site morbidity, potential infection, and a high newly formed tissue until it matures.25 Ideally, the scaffolds
nonunion rate with host tissues.13–17 Bone defects are one of both cartilage and bone tissue engineering should be
of the leading causes of morbidity and disability in elderly porous, highly biocompatible, nontoxic, and capable of
patients.18 Medical restoration of the damaged cartilage promoting cell differentiation and new tissue formation;
and bone tissue remains to be achieved. Therefore, they should also have stable mechanical properties,
developing a method to perfectly and permanently repair degrade in response to the formation of new tissue,
the damaged cartilage and bone tissue is of significant facilitate the diffusion of nutrients and metabolites, adhere
1
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, PR China; 2Nanjing
Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, PR China; 3School of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen,
PR China; 4School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, PR China and 5Hunan Key Laboratory of Green
Chemistry and Application of Biological Nanotechnology, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, PR China
Correspondence: Yan Deng (hndengyan@126.com) or Nongyue He (nyhe1958@163.com)
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 25 November 2016; Revised: 8 January 2017; Accepted: 10 January 2017
Applications of hydrogels
M Liu et al
2
content gradually increases. In the superficial zone, the In contrast to cartilage tissue, bone is a highly vascular-
collagen fibers are aligned parallel to the surface. Collagen ized biomineralized connective tissue with high mechan-
fibers in the middle zone are unaligned and tangential to ical strength and structural complexity.57,75 Natural bone
the cartilage surface. In the deep zone, collagen fibers tissue has a distinct hierarchical structural organization at
are arranged radially. Finally, the collagen fibers in the the macrostructural, microstructural, and nanostructural
calcified zone tend to arborize with little organization and levels (Figure 3).76–77 At the macrostructure level, bone can
mineralization. be distinguished into cortical bone and cancellous bone.
At the microstructure level, the cortical bone is made up of
repeated units of osteon, whereas the cancellous bone is
composed of an interconnecting framework of trabeculae
complemented with bone marrow-filled free spaces. Each
osteon has 20–30 concentric layers of collagen fibers,
called lamellae, which surround the central canal and
contain various blood vessels and nerves. Finally, at the
nanostructure level, there are large amounts of collagen
fibers, calcium phosphate crystals, and non-collagenous
organic proteins, which are the main components of the
trabeculae and osteon units.76 The mechanical properties
of bone tissue strongly depend on the specific structure
and organization of the bony ECM.
This highly organized and complicated structure of the
cartilage and bone is essential to support its biological
functions. The composition of both cartilage and the bony
ECM is highly complex. Normally, the native cartilage ECM
is composed primarily of water, type II collagen,
proteoglycans, hyaluronic acid, glycosaminoglycans, and
elastin.73,76,78–80 Unlike cartilage ECM, the bony ECM is
composed of oriented collagen I fibers and nanocrystals
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of depth-dependent architecture of of carbonated hydroxyapatite, and is complemented
cartilage tissue. From the superficial zone to the deep zone, the with a number of proteoglycans, glycoproteins, and
proteoglycan content gradually increases. In the superficial zone, the sialoproteins.81–82 All components of both cartilage and
collagen fibers are aligned parallel to the surface. Collagen fibers in the
the bony ECM, which are continuously synthesized,
middle zone are unaligned and tangential to the cartilage surface. In the
deep zone, collagen fibers are arranged radially. Finally, the collagen secreted, oriented, and modified by the chondrocytes or
fibers in the calcified zone tend to arborize with little organization and osteoblasts that they support, are essential for chondrocyte
mineralization.72 and osteoblast growth, development, maintenance, and
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of a distinct hierarchical structure of bone tissue. (a)At the macrostructural level, bone is composed of cortical bone
and cancellous bone. (b) At the microstructural level, the cortical bone is made up of repeated units of osteon, which is characterized by 20–30
concentric layers of collagen fibers, called lamellae. The lamellae surround the central canal and contain various blood vessels and nerves. (c) At the
nanostructural level, there are large numbers of collagen fibers, which are composed of periodic collagen fibrils and gaps between the collagen
molecules. The calcium phosphate crystals and non-collagenous organic proteins are embedded in these gaps between collagen molecules.76
regulate the biological activities of the native cartilage hydroxyethyl cellulose. Systematic investigations of the
and bone tissue.57,83–84 Under physiological conditions, the viability, proliferation, and differentiation capacity of
ECM exists in a state of dynamic reciprocity with chon- encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells in the hydrogel
drocytes and osteoblasts, and provides a mechanical have indicated that this chitosan-based injectable
framework for supporting the cells.70 In addition, the ECM hydrogel has a high potential for cartilage tissue
and ECM-incorporated growth factors, together with engineering. To make stimuli-responsive injectable hydro-
cytokines, provide a number of functional cues that affect gels, chitosan is usually combined with various chemical
chondrocyte and osteoblast metabolism, and secretion. components. By combining chitosan–glycerophosphate
Moreover, the microenvironment provided by the ECM is with different concentrations of starch, Sá-Lima et al97
dynamic and regulated by factors, such as mechanical have successfully prepared a novel thermoresponsive
properties, pH, oxygen concentration, and hormonal chitosan–starch hydrogel that can be used as an
actions, that affect tissue homeostasis and possible injectable vehicle for cell delivery. Furthermore, Moreira
aberrations thereof.69,85–86 Eventually, the ECM not only et al98 have reported a bioactive thermogelling chitosan-
regulates cell adhesion, migration, growth, differentiation, based injectable hydrogel synthesized by combining
and apoptosis but also takes part in cytokine activity and chitosan, collagen, and bioactive glass nanoparticles.
intracellular signaling.84,86 The complexity of the ECM is Chitosan is insoluble in water, but it can be dissolved in
essential for specific function of the cartilage and bone acetic acid solution. Therefore, chitosan-based hydrogels
tissue, and plays an important role in keeping the phy- are obtained from chitosan–acetic acid solution, which
siological stability of the microenvironment. Thus, design requires tedious washing steps.99 To overcome such
and synthesis of novel biomaterials that imitate the natural shortcomings, water-soluble chitosan derivatives have
ECM are of great significance in cartilage and bone tissue been introduced. For example, Kamoun100 has prepared
engineering, and regenerative medicine. a new class of nontoxic, injectable, biodegradable
materials called N-succinyl chitosan-dialdehyde starch
hybrid hydrogels. These hydrogels have shorter gelation
INJECTABLE HYDROGELS PREPARED WITH DIFFERENT times, limited water uptake, little weight loss, and con-
BIOMATERIALS siderably tighter hydrogel structures, thus making them
Various biomaterials have been exploited for the fabrica- preferable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.
tion of injectable hydrogel scaffolds for cartilage tissue-
engineering applications, including natural biomaterials Collagen/gelatin-based injectable hydrogels. Collagen
and synthetic biomaterials. is the most abundant mammalian protein in the skin,
connective tissue, ligaments, bone, and cartilage of the
Natural biomaterial-based injectable hydrogels body.101–104 There are at least 19 types of collagen, such
Natural biomaterials have been widely investigated as type I, type II, type III, and type V.101 Recently, naturally
because of their perfect biocompatibility, biodegradabil- derived collagen has been widely used to construct
ity, and similarity to the ECM. Natural biomaterials recently collagen-based scaffolds for various biomedical applica-
investigated for use as injectable hydrogel prepar- tions, particularly tissue engineering, because it has the
ations include chitosan, collagen/gelatin, alginate, fibrin, favorable property of being weakly antigenic.8,49,105 Yuan
elastin, heparin, chondroitin sulfate, and hyaluronic et al105 have combined type I and type II collagens to
acid.3,46,50,52–53,87–91 construct a favorable injectable hydrogel whose com-
pressive modulus can be regulated by changing the type
Chitosan-based injectable hydrogels. Chitosan is a linear I collagen content in the hydrogel. The chondrocytes
polysaccharide that is derived from natural chitin, which is embedded in the hydrogel maintain their natural
composed of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine.92–95 morphology and secrete cartilage-specific ECM.
Recently, chitosan has become increasingly attractive as Funayamaet al106 have developed an injectable type II
an injectable hydrogel for cartilage repair, owing to its collagen hydrogel scaffold and have embedded chon-
structural similarity to cartilage glycosaminoglycan.43,93,96 drocytes in the collagen-based hydrogel and injected it
Chen et al48 have fabricated a tough chitosan–gelatin into the damaged rabbit cartilage without a periosteal
hydrogel via an in situ precipitation method. This graft. At 8 weeks after the injection, favorable hyaline
in situ formed hydrogel exhibits improved mechanical cartilage regeneration with good chondrocyte morphol-
properties, and is biodegradable and biocompatible. ogy was observed, and significant differences between
Naderi-Meshkinet al96 have developed a chitosan- the transplanted and control groups were observed after
based injectable hydrogel via the combination of 24 weeks. Furthermore, collagen-based injectable hydro-
chitosan, glycerol phosphate, and the cross-linking agent gels can be prepared by integrating collagen with other
biomaterials. For example, Kontturiet al107 have devel- glycol chitosan. Chondrocytes encapsulated in the
oped an injectable, in situ forming type II collagen/ hydrogel show excellent proliferation and increased
hyaluronic acid hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. deposition of cartilaginous ECM; considering these results,
After encapsulation of chondrocytes and chondrogenic this hydrogel has great potential for cartilage tissue repair.
growth factor transforming growth factor-β1 into the To overcome its poor mechanical properties, fast
hydrogel, the cell viability and proliferation, morphology, degradation, and hydrolytic reactions, hyaluronic acid is
glycosaminoglycan production, and gene expression usually modified or combined with other biomaterials for
have been investigated. This hydrogel is able to practical applications.113,122 Palumbo et al123 have
maintain chondrocyte viability and characteristics, and designed an in situ forming hydrogel by the addition of
it maybe a potential injectable scaffold for cartilage tissue divinyl sulfone-functionalized inulin to two types of amino-
engineering. functionalized hyaluronic acid derivatives, specifically
Gelatin is a natural protein derived from the degrada- pendant ethylenediamino and amino/octadecyl hyaluro-
tion of collagen with high biocompatibility and biode- nic acids. The properties of the hydrogel indicate that the
gradability in physiological environments.108–109 Recently, presence of pendant C18 chains improves the mechan-
use of gelatin to prepare injectable hydrogels has ical performances of hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels
received popularity. Oh et al110 have designed and and decreases their susceptibility to hyaluronidase hydro-
synthesized an interconnected, double thermoresponsive lysis. Furthermore, encapsulated bovine chondrocytes in
macroporous gelatin-based injectable hydrogel by stabi- the hydrogel result in high viability and proliferation.
lizing oil-in-water high internal phase emulsions, with Domingue et al124 have used cellulose nanocrystals as
gelatin-graft-poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide). In this inject- nanofillers to develop a new class of reinforced hyaluronic
able hydrogel, gelatin was chosen as the backbone of acid-based injectable hydrogels, which comprise adipic
the amphiphilic graft copolymer to form high internal aciddihydrazide-modified hyaluronic acid and aldehyde-
phase emulsions. The double thermoresponsive properties modified hyaluronic acid reinforced by the aldehyde-
of the hydrogel promote proliferation and penetrate modified cellulose nanocrystals. The biological perfor-
fibroblasts during cell seeding. Geng et al111 have mance of the developed hydrogel has been evaluated
prepared a gelatin-based injectable hydrogel from on the basis of the incorporation of human adipose-
oxidized dextran, amino gelatin, and 4-arm PEG-acrylate derived stem cells. The hydrogel has been found to
through a two-step process. The attachment and spread- possess preeminent cell-supportive properties and
ing of preosteoblasts, as well as the encapsulated cell to spread well within the volume of gels, in addition to
spreading and proliferation within the hydrogel indicate exhibiting pronounced proliferative activity.
that the injectable hydrogel possesses favorable mechan-
ical properties, biodegradability, and biocompatibility. Fibrin-based injectable hydrogels. Fibrin, which is
regarded as a favorable cell-transplantation matrix that
Hyaluronic acid-based injectable hydrogels. Hyaluronic can enhance cell attachment, proliferation, differentia-
acid, which interacts with chondrocytes through surface tion, and migration in a 3D scaffold, is a natural fibrous
receptors such as CD44 and RHAMM,112–114 is a linear protein involved in blood clotting.125–127 In previous
polysaccharide in the adult cartilage ECM and is studies, fibrin, alone or in combination with other materials,
composed of disaccharide units of glucuronic acid and has been used to synthesize scaffolds for cartilage tissue-
N-acetylglucosamine.115–117 Hyaluronic acid plays very engineering applications.128–131 Benavides et al132 have
important roles in cartilage and limb bud formation, applied fibrin-based hydrogels, together with PEG and
mesenchymal cell condensation, chondrocyte matrix human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells, to develop a
deposition, and chondrogenic differentiation.73,118–119 novel injectable hydrogel system that is able to induce a
Therefore, hyaluronic acid is regarded as an ideal fibrin-driven angiogenic host response and promote in situ
biomaterial for cartilage tissue repair. Yu et al120 have amniotic fluid-derived stem cell-derived neovasculariza-
fabricated an injectable hyaluronic acid/PEG hydrogel tion. Almeida et al133 have developed an injectable,
with excellent mechanical properties for cartilage tissue cartilaginous ECM microparticle-functionalized fibrin-
engineering. Cells encapsulated in the hydrogel in situ based hydrogel, which transforms growth factor trans-
demonstrate high metabolic viability and proliferation. In forming growth factor-β3 into a putative therapeutic for
addition, taking advantage of its biocompatibility, struc- articular cartilage regeneration. The capacity of the
tural similarity to glycosaminoglycan, and ready formation hydrogel to promote chondrogenes is of freshly isolated
of ionic complexes of chitosan, Park et al121 have stromal cells in vivo suggests that the hydrogel can induce
successfully fabricated an injectable chitosan–hyaluronic cartilage formation and has the potential for cartilage
acid hydrogel utilizing hyaluronic acid and methacrylated repair, and thus may have the potential to overcome
several current challenges related to cartilage tissue degradation profile, compressive strength, and elastic
engineering. In addition, because alginate microbeads module have indicated that alginate/O-carboxymethyl
are stable and biocompatible, this hydrogel has been chitosan forms a preferable blend for tissue-engineering
widely applied among injectable hydrogel systems for applications.
tissue regeneration.125 Hwang et al134 have developed a
novel hybrid hydrogel system using alginate particles and Heparin-based injectable hydrogels. Heparin, which is
a fibrin matrix. In this hydrogel, the introduction of alginate best known for its anticoagulant properties, is a negatively
particles into a fibrin matrix enhances cellular mobility and charged, highly sulfated, linear polysaccharide com-
proliferation, volume retention, and vascularization in vivo, posed of repeating disaccharide units of 1,4-linked uronic
thus making the injectable hybrid system a desirable acid and glucosamine residues.145–148 Owing to its
approach for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. negatively charged functional groups, heparin can inter-
act with proteins, including ECM proteins, growth factors,
Alginate-based injectable hydrogels. Alginate, which and chemokines, which plays important roles in many
consists of guluronic and mannuronic acids, is a polysaccharide biological processes, such as triggering multiple down-
extracted from brown algae (Phaeophyceae).50,135–136 stream signaling pathways and controlling cellular pro-
Alginate has become one of the most commonly used liferation, and differentiation.149–154 As a result, heparin
biomaterials in injectable hydrogel preparation for carti- has widely been used for the fabrication of injectable
lage tissue-engineering applications, owing to its favor- hydrogels that control the delivery of growth factors in
able scaffold forming, non-immunogenicity, and non- tissues, especially during cartilage tissue repair.153,155–158
toxicity.135,137–139 For example, Balakrishnan et al140 have For example, Jin et al159 have used horseradish perox-
produced a rapidly gelling, oxidized alginate-based idase (HRP)-mediated co-cross-linking to form dextran–
injectable hydrogel by self-cross-linking periodate- tyramine (Dex–TA) and heparin–tyramine injectable
oxidized alginate and gelatin in the presence of borax. hydrogel conjugates whose swelling and mechanical
The hydrogel integrates well with the cartilage tissue in properties can be controlled for cartilage tissue-
addition to exhibiting negligible inflammatory and oxida- engineering applications. Chondrocytes incorporated in
tive stress responses. Moreover, chondrocytes encapsu- the hydrogel exhibit favorable viability and proliferation,
lated in the hydrogel have favorable viability, and exhibit with increased production of chondroitin sulfate and
a normal phenotype in terms of proliferation and migra- abundant collagen content. In addition, heparin-based
tion within the matrix, thus suggesting that the hydrogel is injectable hydrogels can also be combined with other
a promising injectable, cell-attracting adhesive scaffold scaffolds to reinforce its curative effects. Such a strategy
for cartilage tissue engineering. has been attempted by Kim et al,160 who have combined
However, there is a drawback to using an injectable the advantages of a porous gelatin-incorporated poly
alginate hydrogel: it is not strong enough to maintain the (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) scaffold and heparin-
structural shape of the regenerated tissue.141 Therefore, based injectable hydrogels to produce a scaffold/hydro-
alginate is usually modified or used in combination with gel composite for delivering chondrocytes to repair partial
other biomaterials to improve its mechanical properties. thickness cartilage defects. Cells encapsulated in the
Zhao et al142 have devised a fully injectable and mecha- scaffold/hydrogel composite exhibit enhanced expres-
nically strong calcium phosphate–alginate cement sion of chondrogenic genes and increased the produc-
hydrogel system. The mechanical properties of the tion of glycosaminoglycans. In addition, significant
hydrogel are much better than those of previous inject- cartilage formation that integrates well with the surround-
able polymeric and hydrogel carriers, and the encapsu- ing natural cartilage tissue has been observed when this
lated cells are viable, exhibit osteodifferentiation, and composite has been used to repair partial thickness
secrete bone minerals. Furthermore, owing to its lack of defects of rabbit knees. All of these results indicate that
cell adhesion ability, alginate is usually blended with other the scaffold/hydrogel composite is a promising scaffold
polymers.143–144 An injectable, biodegradable, oxidized system for cartilage regeneration.
alginate/hyaluronic acid hydrogel has been prepared by
Park and Lee.143 At 6 weeks after injection of the hydrogel Elastin-based injectable hydrogels. Elastin is an insoluble,
with primary chondrocytes into mice, effective cartilage polymeric, elastic protein found in soft tissue, such as skin,
regeneration has been observed. In another study, a class blood vessels, and lungs.161–162 Currently, elastin-based
of biocompatible and biodegradable alginate-based biomaterials are widely used in tissue engineering, espe-
hydrogel blend has been synthesized by using alginate cially in fabricating injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue
and O-carboxymethyl chitosan with the addition of engineering, because elastin not only improves local
fibrin nanoparticles.144 Evaluation of the swelling ratio, elasticity but also facilitates cellular interactions and
signaling during neoplastic tissue formation.162–163 For PEG,114,174–177 poly(L-glutamic acid),178–179 poly(vinyl
instance, Fathi et al87 have fabricated a highly cytocom- alcohol),180 poly(propylene fumarate),181 α,β-poly-
patible and injectable elastin-based hydrogel with alter- (N-hydroxyethyl)-DL-aspartamide,182 PEG-poly(N-isopropyl
able gelation characteristics, favorable mechanical acrylamide) (PNIPAAm),183 methoxy polyethylene glycol,184
properties, and good structural stability. This hydrogel is and methoxy polyethylene glycol–poly(ε-caprolactone).185
generated by the synthesis of a polymer (PNPHO) by For example, Yan et al186 have reported a novel poly
functionalizing poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-polylactide-2- (L-glutamic acid)-based injectable hydrogel. Preliminary
hydroxyethylmethacrylate-co-oligo(ethylene glycol)mono- studies of the hydrogel have demonstrated successful
methyl ether methacrylate with succinimide ester groups, injectability, rapid in vivo gelling, excellent cell growth,
then covalently attaching elastin to PNPHO via interaction satisfactory mechanical stability, and favorable ectopic
of its primary amine groups with the ester groups of PNPHO cartilage formation. Skaalureet al187 have developed a
in aqueous solution. The elastin-co-PNPHO solutions are new cartilage-specific, degradable hydrogel based on
injectable and convert into hydrogels in situ at 37 °C PEG and have encapsulated bovine chondrocytes from
without any cross-linking reagent. In addition, this elastin- different sources in the hydrogel for cartilage tissue
based injectable hydrogel shows favorable structural engineering. This new PEG-based injectable hydrogel
stability and mechanical properties as well as preferable shows promise for cartilage regeneration. Moreover, De
cyto-biocompatibility, thus making it a favorable candi- France et al188 have designed an in situ gelling nano-
date for cartilage tissue-engineering applications. composite hydrogel based on poly(oligoethylene glycol
methacrylate) and rigid rod-like cellulose nanocrystals.
Chondroitin sulfate-based injectable hydrogels. Chon- This injectable hydrogel possesses enhanced mechanical
droitin sulfate, which is composed of sulfated disacchar- properties, increased stability and gelation rates, and
ide repeating units with 1–3 linkages of D-glucuronic acid decreased swelling ratios.
and N-acetylgalactosamine, is an abundant anionic However, synthetic biomaterials are not very biocompa-
linear polysaccharide present in connective tissue and tible, and, as compared with natural biomaterials, they
bones, and is an important component of cartilage in the lack biological activity. The most common strategy used to
body.164–167 Chondroitin sulfate plays important roles in solve this problem is modifying or combining synthetic
many biological processes such as intracellular signaling, biomaterials with bioactive polymers. For example, Yan
cell recognition, the connection between ECM compo- et al178 have fabricated a series of injectable poly(L-
nents and cell-surface glycoproteins, and chondrocyte glutamic acid)/alginate (PLGA/ALG) hydrogels by self-
phenotype regulation, as has widely been investigated in cross-linking hydrazide-modified poly(L-glutamic acid) and
cartilage tissue engineering.168–171 Wiltsey et al172 have aldehyde-modified alginate. This injectable PLGA/ALG
developed a poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-graft-chondroi- hydrogel exhibits attractive properties for future applica-
tin sulfate-based injectable hydrogel scaffold, which acts tion in cartilage tissue engineering. In addition, Yu
as a favorable adhesive interface with surrounding tissue. et al120,189 have fabricated two hyaluronic acid/PEG-
The hydrogel system has been demonstrated to have based injectable hydrogels. Both hydrogels possess
improved mechanical properties at 37 °C, enhanced good mechanical properties and short gelation times,
adhesive tensile strength (ranging from 0.4 to 1 kPa), and and the cells encapsulated in the hydrogels exhibit high
no cytotoxicity to human embryonic kidney 293 cells. metabolic viability and proliferation, thus indicating that
Chen et al173 have successfully developed a novel both hydrogels have great potential in cartilage tissue
injectable pullulan/chondroitin sulfate composite hydro- engineering.
gel, synthesized under physiological conditions, for carti-
lage tissue engineering. The hydrogel system is very
cytocompatible, enhances cell proliferation, and INJECTABLE HYDROGELS FABRICATED VIA DIFFERENT
increases cartilaginous ECM deposition, thus showing APPROACHES
promise for cartilage tissue repair. There are various approaches available for the fabrication
of injectable hydrogels; depending on the approach
Synthetic biomaterial-based injectable hydrogels used, injectable hydrogels can be divided into physical
Compared with natural biomaterials, synthetic biomaterials, hydrogels and chemical hydrogels. Physical hydrogels
owing to their enhanced controllability and reproducibility, are spontaneously formed by weak secondary forces,
enable the systematic study of cell–matrix interactions.57 which respond to the changes in temperature, pH, or
To date, several degradable synthetic polymers have ionic concentration.63,190–191 Chemical hydrogels are pro-
been studied for the development of injectable hydrogels duced through a variety of chemical processes, for
for cartilage tissue engineering; these polymers include example, enzymatic cross-linking, Schiff base cross-linking,
Michael additions, click chemistry, and photo-cross- properties. Ren et al204 have grafted temperature-
linking.44,56,62–63,192–193 sensitive PNIPAAm onto gelatin via atom transfer radical
polymerization, creating a hydrogel that successfully
undergoes a sol-to-gel transition at physiological tem-
Injectable hydrogels by physical methods perature. Tan et al205 have synthesized a temperature-
Temperature-sensitive injectable hydrogels. Injectable sensitive injectable hydrogel whose lower critical solution
hydrogels that are sensitive to temperature changes have temperature is ~ 35 °C, by grafting PNIPAAm-COOH with a
recently attracted substantial attention for applications in single carboxy end group onto aminated alginate
cartilage tissue engineering, because of their gelation through amide bond linkages. In addition, the hydrogel
ability at physiological temperature. These injectable is not cytotoxic and preserves the viability of the
hydrogels are present in aqueous form at room tempera- entrapped cells, thus making it suitable as a cell delivery
ture, but they rapidly gel at physiological temperature vehicle for cartilage tissue-engineering applications.
before solidifying in the desired tissue.194–195 The threshold
temperature at which hydrogels transform from a solution pH-sensitive injectable hydrogels. Injectable hydrogels
to a hydrogel state is defined as the lower critical solu- sensitive to pH value show significant potential in regenera-
tion temperature. The most useful characteristic of tive medicine. To obtain pH-sensitive injectable hydrogels, it
temperature-sensitive hydrogels is that they can undergo is necessary to incorporate the hydrogel with a pH-sensitive
a phase transition without any chemical stimulus. To date, moiety such as the polyelectrolyte N-palmitoylchitosan,65
the most common explanation of the phase transition polyacrylic acid,206 oligomeric sulfamethazine,207 and sulfa-
mechanism of temperature-sensitive injectable hydrogels methazine oligomers (SMOs).208 For example, Shim et al209
is that when the temperature changes, there is a and Kim et al191 have synthesized a pH-sensitive injectable
change in the hydration state favoring intra- and inter- hydrogel by adding pH-sensitive SMOs to both ends
molecular hydrogen bonding, thus eventually changing of a temperature-sensitive poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide)–
the hydrogel solubility.196–197 Therefore, to make inject- PEG–poly(ε-caprolactone-co-lactide) (PCLA–PEG–PCLA)
able hydrogels that are sensitive to temperatures, block copolymer. This pH-sensitive SMO–PCLA–PEG–PCLA–
temperature-sensitive polymers such as poly(lactic- SMO injectable hydrogel exists in solution at high pH (pH 8.0),
co-glycolic acid)–PEG,194 poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide),195 but rapidly changes into a stable gel under physiological
PNIPAAm,197 and poly(ethylene glycol-b-[DL-lactic acid- conditions (pH 7.4). Kim et al191 have encapsulated human
co-glycolic acid]-b-ethylene glycol)198 are needed. mesenchymal stem cells and recombinant human bone
PNIPAAm, an inverse temperature-sensitive polymer morphogenetic protein-2 into the hydrogels under physiolo-
derived from polyacrylic acid, has become one of the gical conditions and injected the mixture into the backs of
most commonly used temperature-sensitive polymers, mice. Histological studies observing human mesenchymal
owing to its rapid phase transition at its ~ 32 °C lower stem cell differentiation for 7 weeks have revealed miner-
critical solution temperature.199–201 However, linear PNI- alized tissue formation and high levels of alkaline phospha-
PAAm is not stable at physiological temperature, thus tase activity in the mineralized tissue.
requiring the modification of other polymers to improve
the stability and mechanical properties. Kloudaet al202 Other physical injectable hydrogels. Other physical
have studied the effects of the macromer end group, injectable hydrogels, such as ion-sensitive and stress-
acrylate or methacrylate, and the effects of fabrication sensitive hydrogels, for cartilage tissue-engineering
conditions on the degradative and swelling properties of applications have also been reported.62–64 For instance,
PNIPAAm-based injectable hydrogels. When immersed in Park et al64 have prepared an ionically cross-linkable
cell culture medium at physiological temperature, the hyaluronate-grafted-alginate hydrogel that easily forms
hydrogels maintain constant swelling, and exhibit no gels in the presence of calcium ions and has been
observable degradation over 8 weeks; the methacrylated demonstrated to be useful in cartilage regeneration by
hydrogels show greater swelling than their acrylated the subcutaneous injection of primary chondrocyte-
analogs. Another temperature-sensitive PNIPAAm-based encapsulated hyaluronate-grafted-alginate into the dor-
injectable hydrogel, synthesized by functionalizing PNI- sal region in a mouse model. Except for the novel
PAAm with methacrylate groups by degradable phos- methods of developing physical injectable hydrogels,
phate ester bonds, has transition temperatures between determining how to improve the biocompatibility, biode-
room temperature and physiological temperature.203 gradability, mechanical properties, and the in vivo main-
Making temperature-sensitive injectable hydrogels by tenance of structural integrity of correlated biomaterials
modifying PNIPAAm with natural polymers is another are further research topics for the design of physical
strategy to optimize their stability and mechanical injectable hydrogels.
auricular chondrocytes have been encapsulated into properties. Meanwhile, owing to the properties of collagen,
PEGDM copolymer hydrogels composed of degradable this hydrogel enhances cell adhesion and proliferation.
(PEG-4,5 LA-DM) and nondegradable PEGDM macromers Ding et al276 have incorporated collagen into the chitosan/
in a 60:40 molar ratio. The histological, biochemical, and β-glycerophosphate system to synthesize an injectable
integrative features of the neocartilage indicate that the chitosan/β-glycerophosphate/collagen-based hydrogel
viability, proliferation, and normal secretion of glycosami- scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mesenchymal stem
noglycan and hydroxyproline contents of the seeded cells co-cultured in the hydrogel have been demonstrated
chondrocytes are maintained, and the neocartilage to be capable of supporting neovascularization and
resembles the native swine auricular cartilage, thus osteogenic lineage differentiation. In recent years, syn-
indicating the promise of these hydrogels in cartilage thetic biomaterials-based injectable hydrogels for bone
tissue-engineering applications. tissue engineering have attracted attention. Jang et al277
have investigated an injectable in vivo forming hydrogel
scaffold made of methoxy polyethylene glycol-b-
INJECTABLE HYDROGELS FOR BONE TISSUE polycaprolactone block copolymer for bone tissue engi-
ENGINEERING neering. Differentiated osteoblasts encapsulated in the
Bone defects have become one of the leading causes of hydrogel exhibit characteristic expression of osteonectin,
morbidity and disability among elderly people osteopontin, and osteocalcin. Vo et al278 have designed
worldwide.268–269 Although autografting is regarded as an N-isopropylacrylamide/gelatin microparticle-composite
the gold standard for bone defect repair, it is limited by hydrogel. The gelatin microparticles incorporated in the
the donor-site morbidity and uncertain adverse effects.270 hydrogel enhance bony bridging and mineralization within
Therefore, bone tissue engineering has attracted consider- the defect and direct bone-implant contact. After encap-
able attention from researchers as a promising strategy for sulation of mesenchymal stem cells in the hydrogel,
repairing bone defects without the limitations and short- significant tissue infiltration and osteoid formation have
comings of using either bone autografts, allografts, or been observed, thus suggesting that the hydrogel system
xenografts.271 facilitate bone ingrowth and integration.
Recently, various injectable hydrogels with good mold- To improve the mechanical properties and mineraliza-
ability and 3D structures have been widely investigated for tion of the scaffold in bone tissue engineering, inorganic
use in bone tissue engineering. Among the biomaterials materials are usually introduced with hybrid hydrogels.
used for preparing injectable hydrogels, alginate is one of Given that hydroxyapatite (HA) is one of the major
the most investigated biomaterials used in bone tissue inorganic components in bone tissue,279 Fu et al280 have
engineering.135 Matsuno et al272 have developed a novel prepared a novel three-component injectable thermo-
injectable 3D hydrogel for bone tissue engineering that sensitive hydrogel composite composed of triblock PEG–
uses β-tricalcium phosphate beads and alginate as a PCL–PEG copolymer, collagen, and nanohydroxyapatite.
scaffold. Mesenchymal stem cells 3D-cultured within the This hydrogel composite has a good interconnected
hydrogel have been implanted subcutaneously for in vivo porous structure in addition to excellent thermosensitivity.
experiments, and have indicated that the scaffold can Furthermore, in vivo studies have demonstrated that the
favorably support osteogenic differentiation. Han et al273 PECE/collagen/nanohydroxyapatite hydrogel has good
have prepared an injectable calcium silicate/sodium biocompatibility and exhibits better performance in
alginate hybrid hydrogel by incorporating calcium silicate guided bone regeneration than in the self-healing process,
into an alginate solution. In 30 s to 10 min, this hydrogel thus indicating its great promise for bone tissue engineer-
undergoes internal in situ gelling when calcium ions are ing. Furthermore, Jiao et al281 have synthesized an in situ
released from calcium silicate with the introduction of cross-linkable citric acid-based biodegradable PEG mal-
D-gluconic acid δ-lactone. Moreover, the hydrogel effi- eate citrate/HA hydrogel. Huang et al282 have fabricated
ciently promotes the adhesion, proliferation, and differen- an injectable nanohydroxyapatite/glycol chitosan/
tiation of osteogenic and angiogenic cells. Chitosan is hyaluronic acid composite hydrogel. MC-3T3-E1 cells
another commonly used biomaterial for synthesizing inject- incorporated in the hydrogel attach and spread well after
able hydrogels in bone tissue engineering.274 Dessi et al275 7 days of co-incubation, thus suggesting that the hydro-
have successfully developed a thermosensitive chitosan- gel’s potential application in bone tissue engineering. Lin
based hydrogel cross-linked with β-glycerophosphate and et al283 have designed an injectable and thermosensitive
reinforced by physical interactions with β-tricalcium phos- hydrogel composite composed of poly(lactic acid-co-
phate. The hydrogel simulates natural bone tissue and glycolic acid)-g-PEG and HA for its potential application in
supports cellular activity and undergoes a sol–gel transition bone tissue engineering. The addition of HA into the
at physiological temperature with typical rheological hydrogel enhances the mechanical properties and
bioactivity of the hydrogel. Most recently, an injectable various preparation methods of injectable hydrogels,
alginate/HA hydrogel scaffold, combined with gelatin including both physical and chemical methods, were
microspheres (GMs), has been reported by Yan et al.284 highlighted. Physical hydrogels can be easily fabricated,
In this hydrogel, HA and GMs successfully improve the owing to their sensitivity to external stimuli such as
mechanical properties of the scaffold, thus demonstrating temperature, pH, ion concentration, and stress. Although
that the HA and GMs double-integrated alginate-based physical injectable hydrogels can easily be produced and
hydrogel has a suitable physical performance and bioac- have low cytotoxicity, they usually have a slow response
tive properties. Thus, the hydrogel shows great potential for time and low stability. In contrast, injectable hydrogels
local treatment of pathologies involving bone defects. prepared via chemical methods show favorable stability
Moreover, taking advantage of the structural and regula- under physiological conditions and excellent mechanical
tory cellular functions of zinc (Zn) and its ability to promote properties, but they have adverse effects in vivo, owing to
osteoblastogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis,285 chemical reactions.
Niranjan et al286 have reported a thermosensitive Over the past several years, there have been many
hydrogel, containing Zn, chitosan, and β-glyceropho- studies focused on synthesizing novel injectable hydrogels
sphate, for bone tissue engineering. Furthermore, for cartilage and bone repair. However, many challenges
Dhivyaet al287 have designed an injectable thermosensi- remain to be addressed in fabricating injectable hydrogels
tive zinc-doped chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite/β-glycero- to optimally achieve cartilage and bone regeneration. The
phosphate-based hydrogel. In vivo studies in a ratbone- major challenge of developing injectable hydrogels for
defect model system have indicated the potential of the cartilage and bone tissue engineering is the design of
hydrogel for accelerating bone formation at molecular bioactive scaffolds that have perfect biocompatibility,
and cellular levels. Other inorganic materials such as biodegradability, stability, and favorable mechanical
nanosilica and Bioglass have been studied for the properties for 3D cell culture, and are able to support
preparation of hybrid hydrogel systems.288–289 For example, nutrient transportation and growth factor delivery. To
Vishnu Priya et al290 have developed an injectable address this challenge, first, bioactive biomaterials that
hydrogel system by using chitin and poly(butylene succinate) can be used to prepare novel injectable hydrogels
loaded with fibrin nanoparticles and magnesium-doped should be developed. Most recently, attempts at using
Bioglass. This hydrogel system enhances the initiation of glycopolypeptide,291 silk,292 carrageenan,293 pectin,294
differentiation and expression of alkaline phosphatase and even the ECM295 to synthesize injectable hydrogels
and osteocalcin, thus indicating its promise for regenerat- have attracted attention. Second, advanced fabrication
ing irregular bone defects. methods require further development, primarily to improve
the mechanical properties and physiological stability, and
to decrease the cytotoxicity and adverse effects of the
CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES hydrogels in vivo. Finally, the development of a methodol-
Injectable hydrogels are promising scaffolds for cartilage ogy to integrate the merits of the various biomaterials and
and bone tissue engineering, owing to their minimal fabrication methods for the preparation of injectable
invasive properties and ability to match irregular defects. hydrogels will play an important role in the clinical
In this review, we summarized many novel injectable applications of hydrogels in cartilage and bone tissue
hydrogels prepared by a variety of biomaterial and engineering.
fabrication techniques for cartilage- and bone tissue-
engineering applications. First, injectable hydrogels fabri-
cated from both natural biomaterials and synthetic Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NSFC (nos 61471168, 61571187,61301043, and
biomaterials were reviewed. Natural biomaterials such as
61527806), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016T90403), and the
chitosan, collagen/gelatin, alginate, fibrin, elastin, heparin, Economical Forest Cultivation and Utilization of 2011 Collaborative
and hyaluronic acid are among the most commonly used Innovation Center in Hunan Province [(2013) 448].
biomaterials for the preparation of injectable hydrogels,
owing to their perfect cyto-biocompatibility, biodegrad-
ability, low cytotoxicity, and similarity to the natural Competing interests
cartilage and bony ECMs. However, injectable hydrogels The authors declare no conflict of interest.
2 Söntjens SHM, Nettles DL, Carnahan MA et al. Biodendrimer-based 26 Balakrishnan B, Banerjee R. Biopolymer-based hydrogels for cartilage
hydrogel scaffolds for cartilage tissue repair. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7: tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2011; 111: 4453–4474.
310–316. 27 Huang CC, Ravindran S, Yin Z et al. 3-D self-assembling leucine zipper
3 Ren K, He C, Xiao C et al. Injectable glycopolypeptide hydrogels as hydrogel with tunable properties for tissue engineering. Biomaterials
biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2015; 2014; 35: 5316–5326.
51: 238–249. 28 Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater
4 Cancedda R, Dozin B, Giannoni P et al. Tissue engineering and cell 2005; 4: 518–524.
therapy of cartilage and bone. Matrix Biol 2003; 22: 81–91. 29 Seliktar D. Designing cell-compatible hydrogels for biomedical
5 Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T et al. Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 applications. Science 2012; 336: 1124–1128.
knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 730–734. 30 Zhang L, Xia K, Lu Z et al. Efficient and facile synthesis of gold
6 Vilela CA, Correia C, Oliveira JM et al. Cartilage repair using hydro- nanorods with finely tunable plasmonic peaks from visible to
gels: a critical review of in vivo experimental designs. ACS Biomater Sci near-IR range. Chem Mater 2014; 26: 1794–1798.
Eng 2015; 1: 726–739. 31 Deng Y, Wang M, Jiang L et al. A comparison of extracellular excitatory
7 Liao J, Shi K, Ding Q et al. Recent developments in scaffold-guided amino acids release inhibition of acute lamotrigine and topiramate
cartilage tissue regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014; 10: 3085–3104. treatment in the hippocampus of ptz-kindled epileptic rats. J Biomed
8 Yuan T, Zhang L, Li K et al. Collagen hydrogel as an immunomodu- Nanotechnol 2013; 9: 1123–1128.
latory scaffold in cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl 32 Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL et al. Graphene-based materials for tissue
Biomater 2014; 102: 337–344. engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016; 105: 255–274.
9 Buckwalter J. Articular cartilage: injuries and potential for healing. 33 Zhang L, Lu Z, Li X et al. Methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) conjugated
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28: 192–202. denatured bovine serum albumin micelles for effective delivery of
10 Huey DJ, Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration camptothecin. Polym Chem 2012; 3: 1958.
remains elusive. Science 2012; 338: 917–921. 34 Fan C, Wang D-A. A biodegradable PEG-based micro-cavitary
11 Frisch J, Venkatesan J, Rey-Rico A et al. Current progress in stem cell- hydrogel as scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 2015;
based gene therapy for articular cartilage repair. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 72: 651–660.
2015; 10: 121–131. 35 Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design
12 Zhang W, Ouyang H, Dass CR et al. Current research on pharmaco- variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4337–4351.
logic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis. Bone Res 2016; 4: 36 Fan J, He N, He Q et al. A novel self-assembled sandwich nanomedi-
15040. cine for NIR-responsive release of NO. Nanoscale 2015; 7: 20055–20062.
13 Tomlinson RE, Silva MJ. Skeletal blood flow in bone repair and 37 Lu Z, Huang Y, Zhang L et al. Preparation of gold nanorods using
maintenance. Bone Res 2013; 1: 311–322. 1,2,4-trihydroxybenzene as a reducing agent. J Nanosci Nanotechnol
14 Flierl MA, Smith WR, Mauffrey C et al. Outcomes and complication 2015; 15: 6230–6235.
rates of different bone grafting modalities in long bone fracture non- 38 Zhang L, Webster TJ. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: Promises for
unions: A retrospective cohort study in 182 patients. J Orthop Surg Res improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today 2009; 4: 66–80.
2013; 8: 33. 39 Slaughter BV, Khurshid SS, Fisher OZ et al. Hydrogels in regenerative
15 Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. medicine. Adv Mater 2009; 21: 3307–3329.
Injury 2005; 36 (Suppl 3): S20–S27. 40 Choi B, Kim S, Lin B et al. Cartilaginous extracellular matrix-modified
16 Sen MK, Miclau T. Autologous iliac crest bone graft: should it still be chitosan hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater
the gold standard for treating nonunions? Injury 2007; 38 (Suppl 1): Interfaces 2014; 6: 20110–20121.
S75–S80. 41 Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, Schacht E. Biopolymer-based hydrogels
17 Marenzana M, Arnett TR. The key role of the blood supply to bone. as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. Biomacromo-
Bone Res 2013; 1: 203–215. lecules 2011; 12: 1387–1408.
18 Wang P, Zhao L, Liu J et al. Bone tissue engineering via nanostructured 42 Yazdimamaghani M, Vashaee D, Assefa S et al. Hybrid macroporous
calcium phosphate biomaterials and stem cells. Bone Res 2014; 2: 14017. gelatin/bioactive-glass/nanosilver scaffolds with controlled degrada-
19 Kim TG, Shin H, Lim DW. Biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. tion behavior and antimicrobial activity for bone tissue engineering.
Adv Funct Mater 2012; 22: 2446–2468. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014; 10: 911–931.
20 Khan WS, Malik A. Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering applica- 43 Jin R, Moreira Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ et al. Injectable chitosan-based
tions for cartilage regeneration. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2012; 7: hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009; 30:
241–242. 2544–2551.
21 Grottkau BE, Lin Y. Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells. Bone 44 Sivashanmugam A, Arun Kumar R, Vishnu Priya M et al. An overview
Res 2013; 1: 133–145. of injectable polymeric hydrogels for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J
22 Bush JR, Liang H, Dickinson M et al. Xylan hemicellulose improves 2015; 72: 543–565.
chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue regeneration. Polym Adv Technol 2016; 45 Tan H, Li H, Rubin JP et al. Controlled gelation and degradation rates
27: 1050–1055. of injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels through a double cross-
23 Sahni V, Tibrewal S, Bissell L et al. The role of tissue engineering in linking strategy. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2011; 5: 790–797.
achilles tendon repair: a review. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2015; 10: 31–36. 46 Gong Y, Wang C, Lai RC et al. An improved injectable polysaccharide
24 Wang Y, Shang S, Li C. Aligned biomimetic scaffolds as a new hydrogel: modified gellan gum for long-term cartilage regeneration
tendency in tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2016; 11: 3–18. in vitro. J Mater Chem 2009; 19: 1968–1977.
25 Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP et al. 25th anniversary article: 47 Wei Y, Hu Y, Hao W et al. A novel injectable scaffold for cartilage tissue
engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 2013; 25: engineering using adipose-derived adult stem cells. J Orthop Res 2008;
5011–5028. 26: 27–33.
48 Shen Z-S, Cui X, Hou R-X et al. Tough biodegradable chitosan-gelatin 70 Brown BN, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for
hydrogels via in situ precipitation for potential cartilage tissue functional tissue reconstruction. Transl Res 2014; 163: 268–285.
engineering. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 55640–55647. 71 Zhang X, Zhu J, Liu F et al. Reduced EGFR signaling enhances cartilage
49 Hong Y, Gong Y, Gao C et al. Collagen-coated polylactide micro- destruction in a mouse osteoarthritis model. Bone Res 2014; 2: 14015.
carriers/chitosan hydrogel composite: injectable scaffold for cartilage 72 Hardin JA, Cobelli N, Santambrogio L. Consequences of metabolic and
regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 85: 628–637. oxidative modifications of cartilage tissue. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2015; 11:
50 Bidarra SJ, Barrias CC, Granja PL. Injectable alginate hydrogels for cell 521–529.
delivery in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 1646–1662. 73 Kim IL, Mauck RL, Burdick JA. Hydrogel design for cartilage tissue
51 Dorsey SM, McGarvey JR, Wang H et al. MRI evaluation of injectable engineering: a case study with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials 2011; 32:
hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel therapy to limit ventricular remodel- 8771–8782.
ing after myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 2015; 69: 65–75. 74 Becerra J, Andrades JA, Guerado E et al. Articular cartilage: structure
52 Sim HJ, Thambi T, Lee DS. Heparin-based temperature-sensitive and regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010; 16: 617–627.
injectable hydrogels for protein delivery. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3: 75 Tan R, Feng Q, She Z et al. In vitro and in vivo degradation of an
8892–8901. injectable bone repair composite. Polym Degrad Stab 2010; 95:
53 Wang F, Li Z, Khan M et al. Injectable, rapid gelling and highly flexible 1736–1742.
hydrogel composites as growth factor and cell carriers. Acta Biomater 76 Gong T, Xie J, Liao J et al. Nanomaterials and bone regeneration. Bone
2010; 6: 1978–1991. Res 2015; 3: 15029.
54 Alexander A, Ajazuddin, Khan J et al. Poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic- 77 Henkel J, Woodruff MA, Epari DR et al. Bone regeneration based on
co-glycolic acid) based thermosensitive injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering conceptions—A 21st century perspective. Bone Res
biomedical applications. J Control Release 2013; 172: 715–729. 2013; 1: 216–248.
55 Ossipov DA, Piskounova S, Hilborn J. Poly(vinyl alcohol) cross-linkers 78 Mow V, Guo X. Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular car-
for in vivo injectable hydrogels. Macromolecules 2008; 41: 3971–3982. tilage: Their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng
56 Overstreet DJ, Dutta D, Stabenfeldt SE et al. Injectable hydrogels. 2002; 4: 175–209.
J Polym Sci Pol Phys 2012; 50: 881–903. 79 Bobick BE, Chen FH, Le AM et al. Regulation of the chondrogenic
57 Amini AA, Nair LS. Injectable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. phenotype in culture. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2009; 87:
Biomed Mater 2012; 7: 024105. 351–371.
58 Binetti VR, Fussell GW, Lowman AM. Evaluation of two chemical 80 Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T et al. Bacterial cellulose as a
crosslinking methods of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for injectable potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005;
nucleus pulposus replacement. J Appl Polym Sci 2014; 131: 40843. 26: 419–431.
59 Jin R, Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ et al. Enzymatically-crosslinked injectable 81 Alford AI, Kozloff KM, Hankenson KD. Extracellular matrix networks
hydrogels based on biomimetic dextran-hyaluronic acid conjugates for in bone remodeling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2015; 65: 20–31.
cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 3103–3113. 82 Cordonnier T, Sohier J, Rosset P et al. Biomimetic materials for bone
60 Lin C-C, Ki CS, Shih H. Thiol-norbornene photoclick hydrogels for tissue engineering—state of the art and future trends. Adv Eng Mater
tissue engineering applications. J Appl Polym Sci 2015; 132: 41563. 2011; 13: B135–B150.
61 Li Y, Rodrigues J, Tomas H. Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: 83 Ahadian S, Sadeghian RB, Salehi S et al. Bioconjugated hydrogels for
gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Bioconjug Chem 2015; 26:
2012; 41: 2193–2221. 1984–2001.
62 Tan H, Marra KG. Injectable, biodegradable hydrogels for tissue 84 Sell S, Barnes C, Smith M et al. Extracellular matrix regenerated: tissue
engineering applications. Materials 2010; 3: 1746–1767. engineering via electrospun biomimetic nanofibers. Polym Int 2007; 56:
63 Ko DY, Shinde UP, Yeon B et al. Recent progress of in situ formed gels 1349–1360.
for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2013; 38: 672–701. 85 Bissell MJ, Hall HG, Parry G. How does the extracellular matrix direct
64 Park H, Woo EK, Lee KY. Ionically cross-linkable hyaluronate-based gene expression? J Theor Biol 1982; 99: 31–68.
hydrogels for injectable cell delivery. J Control Release 2014; 196: 86 Nelson CM, Bissell MJ. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling:
146–153. tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer.
65 Chiu YL, Chen SC, Su CJ et al. pH-triggered injectable hydrogels pre- Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006; 22: 287–309.
pared from aqueous N-palmitoyl chitosan: in vitro characteristics and 87 Fathi A, Mithieux SM, Wei H et al. Elastin based cell-laden injectable
in vivo biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4877–4888. hydrogels with tunable gelation, mechanical and biodegradation
66 Choi BG, Park MH, Cho S-H et al. Thermal gelling polyalanine- properties. Biomaterials 2014; 35: 5425–5435.
poloxamine-polyalanine aqueous solution for chondrocytes 3D culture: 88 Sargeant TD, Desai AP, Banerjee S et al. An in situ forming collagen-
Initial concentration effect. Soft Matter 2011; 7: 456–462. PEG hydrogel for tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 124–132.
67 Yeon B, Park MH, Moon HJ et al. 3D culture of adipose-tissue-derived 89 Williams C, Budina E, Stoppel WL et al. Cardiac extracellular matrix-
stem cells mainly leads to chondrogenesis in poly(ethylene glycol)-poly fibrin hybrid scaffolds with tunable properties for cardiovascular tissue
(L-alanine) diblock copolymer thermogel. Biomacromolecules 2013; 14: engineering. Acta Biomater 2015; 14: 84–95.
3256–3266. 90 Li Y, Tian H, Chen X. Hyaluronic acid based injectable hydrogels for
68 Badylak SF, Weiss DJ, Caplan A et al. Engineered whole organs and localized and sustained gene delivery. J Control Release 2015; 213:
complex tissues. Lancet 2012; 379: 943–952. E140–E141.
69 Benders KE, van Weeren PR, Badylak SF et al. Extracellular matrix 91 Ji X, Yang W, Wang T et al. Coaxially electrospun core/shell structured
scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 2013; 31: poly(L-lactide) acid/chitosan nanofibers for potential drug carrier in
169–176. tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2013; 9: 1672–1678.
92 Tan H, Chu CR, Payne KA et al. Injectable in situ forming biodegrad- 111 Geng X, Mo X, Fan L et al. Hierarchically designed injectable hydrogel
able chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for cartilage tissue from oxidized dextran, amino gelatin and 4-arm poly(ethylene glycol)-
engineering. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 2499–2506. acrylate for tissue engineering application. J Mater Chem 2012; 22:
93 Martino AD, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer 25130–25139.
for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5983–5990. 112 Evanko SP, Tammi MI, Tammi RH et al. Hyaluronan-dependent
94 Yang W, Fu J, Wang T et al. Chitosan/Sodium tripolyphosphate pericellular matrix. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007; 59: 1351–1365.
nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and application as drug 113 Kim D-D, Kim D-H, Son Y-J. Three-dimensional porous scaffold of
carrier. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2009; 5: 591–595. hyaluronic acid for cartilage tissue engineering. Stud Mechanobiol Tissue
95 Hu X, Zhang Z, Wang G et al. Preparation of chitosan-sodium sodium Eng Biomater 2011; 8: 329–349.
tripolyphosphate nanoparticles via reverse microemulsion-ionic 114 Jin R, Moreira Teixeira LS, Krouwels A et al. Synthesis and character-
gelation method. J Bionanosci 2015; 9: 301–305. ization of hyaluronic acid-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels via Michael
96 Naderi-Meshkin H, Andreas K, Matin MM et al. Chitosan-based addition: an injectable biomaterial for cartilage repair. Acta Biomater
injectable hydrogel as a promising in situ forming scaffold for cartilage 2010; 6: 1968–1977.
tissue engineering. Cell Biol Int 2014; 38: 72–84. 115 Balazs EA, Watson D, Duff IF et al. Hyaluronic acid in synovial fluid. I.
97 Sá-Lima H, Caridade SG, Mano JF et al. Stimuli-responsive chitosan- Molecular parameters of hyaluronic acid in normal and arthritic
starch injectable hydrogels combined with encapsulated adipose- human fluids. Arthritis Rheum 1967; 10: 357–376.
derived stromal cells for articular cartilage regeneration. Soft Matter 116 Camenisch TD, McDonald JA. Hyaluronan-is bigger better? Am J Respir
2010; 6: 5184–5195. Cell Mol Biol 2000; 23: 431–433.
98 Moreira CD, Carvalho SM, Mansur HS et al. Thermogelling chitosan- 117 Muzzarelli RA, Greco F, Busilacchi A et al. Chitosan, hyaluronan and
collagen-bioactive glass nanoparticle hybrids as potential injectable chondroitin sulfate in tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration:
systems for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 58: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 89: 723–739.
1207–1216. 118 Knudson CB. Hyaluronan and CD44: strategic players for cell-matrix
99 Yang X, Liu Q, Chen X et al. Investigation of PVA/ws-chitosan interactions during chondrogenesis and matrix assembly. Birth Defects
hydrogels prepared by combined γ-irradiation and freeze-thawing. Res C Embryo Today 2003; 69: 174–196.
Carbohydr Polym 2008; 73: 401–408. 119 Astachov L, Vago R, Aviv M et al. Hyaluronan and mesenchymal stem
100 Kamoun EA. N-succinyl chitosan-dialdehyde starch hybrid hydrogels cells: from germ layer to cartilage and bone. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)
for biomedical applications. J Adv Res 2016; 7: 69–77. 2011; 16: 261–276.
101 Lee CH, Singla A, Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. Int J 120 Yu F, Cao X, Li Y et al. An injectable hyaluronic acid/PEG hydrogel for
Pharm 2001; 221: 1–22. cartilage tissue engineering formed by integrating enzymatic cross-
102 Parmar PA, Chow LW, St-Pierre JP et al. Collagen-mimetic peptide- linking and Diels-Alder “click chemistry”. Polym Chem 2014; 5:
modifiable hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials 1082–1090.
2015; 54: 213–225. 121 Park H, Choi B, Hu J et al. Injectable chitosan hyaluronic acid hydrogels
103 Pérez CM, Panitch A, Chmielewski J. A collagen peptide-based phy- for cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 4779–4786.
sical hydrogel for cell encapsulation. Macromol Biosci 2011; 11: 122 Barbucci R, Lamponi S, Borzacchiello A et al. Hyaluronic acid
1426–1431. hydrogel in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 2002; 23:
104 Ackermann B, Steinmeyer J. Collagen biosynthesis of mechanically 4503–4513.
loaded articular cartilage explants. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 123 Palumbo FS, Fiorica C, Di Stefano M et al. In situ forming hydrogels
906–914. of hyaluronic acid and inulin derivatives for cartilage regeneration.
105 Yuan L, Li B, Yang J et al. Effects of composition and mechanical Carbohydr Polym 2015; 122: 408–416.
property of injectable collagen I/II composite hydrogels on chon- 124 Domingues RM, Silva M, Gershovich P et al. Development of injectable
drocyte behaviors. Tissue Eng Part A 2016; 22: 899–906. hyaluronic acid/cellulose nanocrystals bionanocomposite hydrogels
106 Funayama A, Niki Y, Matsumoto H et al. Repair of full-thickness for tissue engineering applications. Bioconjug Chem 2015; 26: 1571–1581.
articular cartilage defects using injectable type II collagen gel embed- 125 Zhou H, Xu HH. The fast release of stem cells from alginate-fibrin
ded with cultured chondrocytes in a rabbit model. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: microbeads in injectable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioma-
225–232. terials 2011; 32: 7503–7513.
107 Kontturi LS, Järvinen E, Muhonen V et al. An injectable, in situ forming 126 Eyrich D, Brandl F, Appel B et al. Long-term stable fibrin gels for car-
type II collagen/hyaluronic acid hydrogel vehicle for chondrocyte tilage engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 55–65.
delivery in cartilage tissue engineering. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2014; 4: 127 Sha'ban M, Yoon SJ, Ko YK et al. Fibrin promotes proliferation and
149–158. matrix production of intervertebral disc cells cultured in three-
108 Santoro M, Tatara AM, Mikos AG. Gelatin carriers for drug and cell dimensional poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffold. J Biomater Sci Polym
delivery in tissue engineering. J Control Release 2014; 190: 210–218. Ed 2008; 19: 1219–1237.
109 Song K, Li L, Li W et al. Three-dimensional dynamic fabrication of 128 Ahmed TA, Dare EV, Hincke M. Fibrin: a versatile scaffold for tissue
engineered cartilage based on chitosan/gelatin hybrid hydrogel scaf- engineering applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008; 14: 199–215.
fold in a spinner flask with a special designed steel frame. Mater Sci Eng 129 Snyder TN, Madhavan K, Intrator M et al. A fibrin/hyaluronic acid
C Mater Biol Appl 2015; 55: 384–392. hydrogel for the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells and potential for
110 Oh BH, Bismarck A, Chan-Park MB. Injectable, interconnected, articular cartilage repair. J Biol Eng 2014; 8: 10.
high-porosity macroporous biocompatible gelatin scaffolds made by 130 Dare EV, Griffith M, Poitras P et al. Genipin cross-linked fibrin
surfactant-free emulsion templating. Macromol Rapid Commun 2015; 36: hydrogels for in vitro human articular cartilage tissue-engineered
364–372. regeneration. Cells Tissues Organs 2009; 190: 313–325.
131 Choi JW, Choi BH, Park SH et al. Mechanical stimulation by ultrasound 151 Hudalla GA, Murphy WL. Biomaterials that regulate growth factor
enhances chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a activity via bioinspired interactions. Adv Funct Mater 2011; 21:
fibrin-hyaluronic acid hydrogel. Artif Organs 2013; 37: 648–655. 1754–1768.
132 Benavides OM, Brooks AR, Cho SK et al. In situ vascularization of 152 Yang Y, Tang H, Kowitsch A et al. Novel mineralized heparin-gelatin
injectable fibrin/poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels by human amniotic nanoparticles for potential application in tissue engineering of bone.
fluid-derived stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015; 103: 2645–2653. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014; 25: 669–680.
133 Almeida HV, Eswaramoorthy R, Cunniffe GM et al. Fibrin hydrogels 153 Go DH, Joung YK, Lee SY et al. Tetronic-oligolactide-heparin hydrogel
functionalized with cartilage extracellular matrix and incorporating as a multi-functional scaffold for tissue regeneration. Macromol Biosci
freshly isolated stromal cells as an injectable for cartilage regeneration. 2008; 8: 1152–1160.
Acta Biomater 2016; 36: 55–62. 154 Wang T, Ji X, Jin L et al. Fabrication and characterization of
134 Hwang CM, Ay B, Kaplan DL et al. Assessments of injectable alginate heparin-grafted poly-l-lactic acid-chitosan core-shell nanofibers
particle-embedded fibrin hydrogels for soft tissue reconstruction. scaffold for vascular gasket. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013; 5:
Biomed Mater 2013; 8: 014105. 3757–3763.
135 Venkatesan J, Bhatnagar I, Manivasagan P et al. Alginate composites for 155 Nakamura S, Ishihara M, Obara K et al. Controlled release of fibroblast
bone tissue engineering: a review. Int J Biol Macromol 2015; 72: 269–281. growth factor-2 from an injectable 6-O-desulfated heparin hydrogel
136 Zhang F, Li X, He N et al. Antibacterial properties of ZnO/calcium and subsequent effect on in vivo vascularization. J Biomed Mater Res A
alginate composite and its application in wastewater treatment. J 2006; 78: 364–371.
Nanosci Nanotechnol 2015; 15: 3839–3845. 156 Fujita M, Ishihara M, Shimizu M et al. Therapeutic angiogenesis
137 Park H, Kang SW, Kim BS et al. Shear-reversibly crosslinked alginate induced by controlled release of fibroblast growth factor-2 from
hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 2009; 9: 895–901. injectable chitosan/non-anticoagulant heparin hydrogel in a rat hin-
138 Ruvinov E, Cohen S. Alginate biomaterial for the treatment of myo- dlimb ischemia model. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15: 58–65.
cardial infarction: progress, translational strategies, and clinical out- 157 Lee J, Choi WI, Tae G et al. Enhanced regeneration of the ligament-bone
look: from ocean algae to patient bedside. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016; 96: interface using a poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffold with
54–76. local delivery of cells/BMP-2 using a heparin-based hydrogel. Acta
139 Follin B, Juhl M, Cohen S et al. Human adipose-derived stromal cells in Biomater 2011; 7: 244–257.
a clinically applicable injectable alginate hydrogel: phenotypic and 158 Kim M, Kim SE, Kang SS et al. The use of de-differentiated
immunomodulatory evaluation. Cytotherapy 2015; 17: 1104–1118. chondrocytes delivered by a heparin-based hydrogel to regenerate
140 Balakrishnan B, Joshi N, Jayakrishnan A et al. Self-crosslinked oxidized cartilage in partial-thickness defects. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 7883–7896.
alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds 159 Jin R, Moreira Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ et al. Chondrogenesis in injectable
for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater 2014; 10: 3650–3663. enzymatically crosslinked heparin/dextran hydrogels. J Control Release
141 Kretlow JD, Young S, Klouda L et al. Injectable biomaterials for 2011; 152: 186–195.
regenerating complex craniofacial tissues. Adv Mater 2009; 21: 160 Kim M, Hong B, Lee J et al. Composite system of PLCL scaffold and
3368–3393. heparin-based hydrogel for regeneration of partial-thickness cartilage
142 Zhao L, Weir MD, Xu HH. An injectable calcium phosphate-alginate defects. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13: 2287–2298.
hydrogel-umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell paste for bone tissue 161 Annabi N, Mithieux SM, Weiss AS et al. Cross-linked open-pore elastic
engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 6502–6510. hydrogels based on tropoelastin, elastin and high pressure CO2.
143 Park H, Lee KY. Cartilage regeneration using biodegradable oxidized Biomaterials 2010; 31: 1655–1665.
alginate/hyaluronate hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014; 102: 162 Ozsvar J, Mithieux SM, Wang R et al. Elastin-based biomaterials and
4519–4525. mesenchymal stem cells. Biomater Sci 2015; 3: 800–809.
144 Jaikumar D, Sajesh KM, Soumya S et al. Injectable alginate-O- 163 Annabi N, Fathi A, Mithieux SM et al. The effect of elastin on
carboxymethyl chitosan/nano fibrin composite hydrogels for adipose chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on poly (varepsilon-capro-
tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2015; 74: 318–326. lactone)/elastin composites. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 1517–1525.
145 Casu B. Structure and biological activity of heparin. Adv Carbohydr 164 Knutson JR, Iida J, Fields GB et al. CD44/chondroitin sulfate
Chem Biochem 1985; 43: 51–134. proteoglycan and alpha 2 beta 1 integrin mediate human melanoma
146 Tae G, Kim Y-J, Choi W-I et al. Formation of a novel heparin-based cell migration on type IV collagen and invasion of basement mem-
hydrogel in the presence of heparin-binding biomolecules. Biomacro- branes. Mol Biol Cell 1996; 7: 383–396.
molecules 2007; 8: 1979–1986. 165 Wang DA, Varghese S, Sharma B et al. Multifunctional chondroitin
147 Liang Y, Kiick KL. Heparin-functionalized polymeric biomaterials in sulphate for cartilage tissue-biomaterial integration. Nat Mater 2007; 6:
tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Acta Biomater 2014; 385–392.
10: 1588–1600. 166 Dwivedi P, Bhat S, Nayak V et al. Study of different delivery modes of
148 Sundaram M, Qi Y, Shriver Z et al. Rational design of low-molecular chondroitin sulfate using microspheres and cryogel scaffold for appli-
weight heparins with improved in vivo activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA cation in cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Po 2014; 63:
2003; 100: 651–656. 859–872.
149 Mammadov R, Mammadov B, Guler MO et al. Growth factor binding 167 Jo S, Kim D, Woo J et al. Development and physicochemical evaluation
on heparin mimetic peptide nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13: of chondroitin sulfate-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel. Macromol Res
3311–3319. 2011; 19: 147–155.
150 Guillame-Gentil O, Semenov O, Roca AS et al. Engineering the extra- 168 Strehin I, Nahas Z, Arora K et al. A versatile pH sensitive chondroitin
cellular environment: strategies for building 2D and 3D cellular struc- sulfate-PEG tissue adhesive and hydrogel. Biomaterials 2010; 31:
tures. Adv Mater 2010; 22: 5443–5462. 2788–2797.
169 Jo S, Kim S, Noh I. Synthesis of in situ chondroitin sulfate hydrogel 188 De France KJ, Chan KJ, Cranston ED et al. Enhanced mechanical
through phosphine-mediated Michael type addition reaction. Macromol properties in cellulose nanocrystal-poly(oligoethylene glycol metha-
Res 2012; 20: 968–976. crylate) injectable nanocomposite hydrogels through control of physi-
170 Liao J, Qu Y, Chu B et al. Biodegradable CSMA/PECA/graphene cal and chemical cross-linking. Biomacromolecules 2016; 17: 649–660.
porous hybrid scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 189 Yu F, Cao X, Li Y et al. Diels-Alder crosslinked HA/PEG hydrogels
9879. with high elasticity and fatigue resistance for cell encapsulation and
171 Zhang L, Li K, Xiao W et al. Preparation of collagen-chondroitin sulfate- articular cartilage tissue repair. Polym Chem 2014; 5: 5116–5123.
hyaluronic acid hybrid hydrogel scaffolds and cell compatibility 190 Liu H, Liu J, Qi C et al. Thermosensitive injectable in situ forming
in vitro. Carbohydr Polym 2011; 84: 118–125. carboxymethyl chitin hydrogel for three-dimensional cell culture. Acta
172 Wiltsey C, Kubinski P, Christiani T et al. Characterization of injectable Biomater 2016; 35: 228–237.
hydrogels based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-g-chondroitin sulfate 191 Kim HK, Shim WS, Kim SE et al. Injectable in situ-forming pH/thermo-
with adhesive properties for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering. sensitive hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;
J Mater Sci Mater Med 2013; 24: 837–847. 15: 923–933.
173 Chen F, Yu S, Liu B et al. An injectable enzymatically crosslinked car- 192 Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv
boxymethylated pullulan/chondroitin sulfate hydrogel for cartilage Rev 2012; 64: 18–23.
tissue engineering. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 20014. 193 Yang J-A, Yeom J, Hwang BW et al. In situ-forming injectable hydrogels
174 Fan J, He Q, Liu Y et al. Light-responsive biodegradable nanomedicine for regenerative medicine. Prog Polym Sci 2014; 39: 1973–1986.
overcomes multidrug resistance via NO-enhanced chemosensitization. 194 Nagahama K, Takahashi A, Ohya Y. Biodegradable polymers exhibit-
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016; 8: 13804–13811. ing temperature-responsive sol-gel transition as injectable biomedical
175 Yang W, He N, Fu J et al. Preparation of porous core-shell poly l-lactic materials. React Funct Polym 2013; 73: 979–985.
acid/polyethylene glycol superfine fibres containing drug. J Nanosci 195 Sood N, Bhardwaj A, Mehta S et al. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels in
Nanotechnol 2015; 15: 9911–9917. drug delivery and tissue engineering. Drug Deliv 2016; 23: 758–780.
176 Zhang L, Xia K, Deng Y et al. Methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) conjugated 196 Yu R, Zheng S. Poly(acrylic acid)-grafted poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide)
doxorubicin micelles for effective killing of cancer cells. J Nanosci networks: preparation, characterization and hydrogel behavior.
Nanotechnol 2014; 14: 6458–6460. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2011; 22: 2305–2324.
177 Zhang L, Lu Z, Bai Y et al. PEGylated denatured bovine serum albumin 197 Ashraf S, Park H-K, Park H et al. Snapshot of phase transition in
modified water-soluble inorganic nanocrystals as multifunctional drug thermoresponsive hydrogel PNIPAM: role in drug delivery and tissue
delivery platforms. J Mater Chem B 2013; 1: 1289. engineering. Macromol Res 2016; 24: 297–304.
178 Yan S, Wang T, Feng L et al. Injectable in situ self-cross-linking 198 Lee PY, Cobain E, Huard J et al. Thermosensitive hydrogel PEG-PLGA-
hydrogels based on poly(L-glutamic acid) and alginate for cartilage PEG enhances engraftment of muscle-derived stem cells and promotes
tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2014; 15: 4495–4508. healing in diabetic wound. Mol Ther 2007; 15: 1189–1194.
179 Yang W, He N, Li Z. Rapamycin release study of porous poly(L-lactic 199 Vo TN, Ekenseair AK, Spicer PP et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of
acid) scaffolds, prepared via coaxial electrospinning. J Nanosci Nano- self-mineralization and biocompatibility of injectable, dual-gelling
technol 2016; 16: 9404–9412. hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. J Control Release 2015; 205:
180 Bonakdar S, Emami SH, Shokrgozar MA et al. Preparation and char- 25–34.
acterization of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels crosslinked by biodegrad- 200 Duarte Campos DF, Drescher W, Rath B et al. Supporting biomaterials
able polyurethane for tissue engineering of cartilage. Mat Sci Eng C for articular cartilage repair. Cartilage 2012; 3: 205–221.
2010; 30: 636–643. 201 Hu X, Cheng W, Shao Z et al. Synthesis and characterization of
181 Kallukalam BC, Jayabalan M, Sankar V. Studies on chemically cross- temperature-sensitive hydrogels. E-Polymers 2015; 15: 353–360.
linkable carboxy terminated-poly(propylene fumarate-co-ethylene 202 Klouda L, Perkins KR, Watson BM et al. Thermoresponsive, in situ
glycol)-acrylamide hydrogel as an injectable biomaterial. Biomed cross-linkable hydrogels based on N-isopropylacrylamide: Fabrication,
Mater 2009; 4: 015002. characterization and mesenchymal stem cell encapsulation. Acta
182 Sun S, Cao H, Su H et al. Preparation and characterization of a novel Biomater 2011; 7: 1460–1467.
injectable in situ cross-linked hydrogel. Polym Bull 2009; 62: 699–711. 203 Watson BM, Kasper FK, Engel PS et al. Synthesis and characterization
183 Alexander A, Ajazuddin, Khan J et al. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-poly of injectable, biodegradable, phosphate-containing, chemically
(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) based thermosensitive injectable cross-linkable, thermoresponsive macromers for bone tissue engineer-
hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2014; 88: ing. Biomacromolecules 2014; 15: 1788–1796.
575–585. 204 Ren Z, Wang Y, Ma S et al. Effective bone regeneration using thermo-
184 Hyun H, Park S, Kwon D et al. Thermo-responsive injectable MPEG- sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) grafted gelatin as injectable
polyester diblock copolymers for sustained drug release. Polymers 2014; carrier for bone mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces
6: 2670–2683. 2015; 7: 19006–19015.
185 Kwon JS, Yoon SM, Kwon DY et al. Injectable in situ-forming hydrogel 205 Tan R, She Z, Wang M et al. Thermo-sensitive alginate-based injectable
for cartilage tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 2013; 1: 3314–3321. hydrogel for tissue engineering. Carbohyd Polym 2012; 87: 1515–1521.
186 Yan S, Zhang X, Zhang K et al. Injectable in situ forming poly(L-glu- 206 Lima GGD, Campos L, Junqueira A et al. A novel pH-sensitive ceramic-
tamic acid) hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B hydrogel for biomedical applications. Polym Advan Technol 2015; 26:
2016; 4: 947–961. 1439–1446.
187 Skaalure SC, Chu S, Bryant SJ. An enzyme-sensitive PEG hydrogel 207 Huynh CT, Nguyen MK, Jeong IK et al. Synthesis, characteristics
based on aggrecan catabolism for cartilage tissue engineering. Adv and potential application of poly(beta-amino ester urethane)-based
Healthc Mater 2015; 4: 420–431. multiblock co-polymers as an injectable, biodegradable and
ph/temperature-sensitive hydrogel system. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 227 Sun J, Xiao C, Tan H et al. Covalently crosslinked hyaluronic acid-
2012; 23: 1091–1106. chitosan hydrogel containing dexamethasone as an injectable scaffold
208 Shim WS, Yoo JS, Bae YH et al. Novel injectable pH and temperature for soft tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 2013; 129: 682–688.
sensitive block copolymer hydrogel. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6: 228 Li L, Ge J, Ma PX et al. Injectable conducting interpenetrating
2930–2934. polymer network hydrogels from gelatin-graft-polyaniline and
209 Shim WS, Kim JH, Park H et al. Biodegradability and biocompatibility oxidized dextran with enhanced mechanical properties. RSC Adv 2015;
of a pH- and thermo-sensitive hydrogel formed from a sulfonamide- 5: 92490–92498.
modified poly(epsilon-caprolactone-co-lactide)-poly(ethylene glycol)- 229 Cheng Y, Nada AA, Valmikinathan CM et al. In situ gelling
poly(epsilon-caprolactone-co-lactide) block copolymer. Biomaterials polysaccharide-based hydrogel for cell and drug delivery in tissue
2006; 27: 5178–5185. engineering. J Appl Polym Sci 2014; 131: 39934.
210 Lee F, Chung JE, Kurisawa M. An injectable enzymatically crosslinked 230 Cao L, Cao B, Lu C et al. An injectable hydrogel formed by in situ cross-
hyaluronic acid-tyramine hydrogel system with independent tuning of linking of glycol chitosan and multi-benzaldehyde functionalized
mechanical strength and gelation rate. Soft Matter 2008; 4: 880–887. PEG analogues for cartilage tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3:
211 Kurisawa M, Lee F, Wang L-S et al. Injectable enzymatically crosslinked 1268–1280.
hydrogel system with independent tuning of mechanical strength and 231 Ma Y-H, Yang J, Li B et al. Biodegradable and injectable polymer-
gelation rate for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Mater Chem liposome hydrogel: a promising cell carrier. Polym Chem 2016; 7:
2010; 20: 5371–5375. 2037–2044.
212 Park KM, Lee Y, Son JY et al. In situ SVVYGLR peptide conjugation into 232 Lih E, Yoon KiJ, Jin Woo B et al. An in situ gel-forming heparin-
injectable gelatin-poly(ethylene glycol)-tyramine hydrogel via enzyme- conjugated PLGA-PEG-PLGA copolymer. J Bioact Compat Pol 2008; 23:
mediated reaction for enhancement of endothelial cell activity and 444–457.
neo-vascularization. Bioconjug Chem 2012; 23: 2042–2050. 233 Censi R, Fieten PJ, di Martino P et al. In situ forming hydrogels by
213 Kuo KC, Lin RZ, Tien HW et al. Bioengineering vascularized tissue tandem thermal gelling and michael addition reaction between thermo-
constructs using an injectable cell-laden enzymatically crosslinked sensitive triblock copolymers and thiolated hyaluronan. Macromolecules
collagen hydrogel derived from dermal extracellular matrix. Acta Bio- 2010; 43: 5771–5778.
mater 2015; 27: 151–166. 234 Lin C, Zhao P, Li F et al. Thermosensitive in situ-forming dextran-
214 Jin R, Lin C, Cao A. Enzyme-mediated fast injectable hydrogels based pluronic hydrogels through Michael addition. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater
on chitosan-glycolic acid/tyrosine: Preparation, characterization, and 2010; 30: 1236–1244.
chondrocyte culture. Polym Chem 2014; 5: 391–398. 235 Mather BD, Viswanathan K, Miller KM et al. Michael addition reactions
215 Teixeira LS, Feijen J, van Blitterswijk CA et al. Enzyme-catalyzed in macromolecular design for emerging technologies. Prog Polym Sci
crosslinkable hydrogels: emerging strategies for tissue engineering. 2006; 31: 487–531.
Biomaterials 2012; 33: 1281–1290. 236 Yu Y, Deng C, Meng F et al. Novel injectable biodegradable glycol
216 Kobayashi S, Uyama H, Kimura S. Enzymatic polymerization. Chem chitosan-based hydrogels crosslinked by Michael-type addition reac-
Rev 2001; 101: 3793–3818. tion with oligo(acryloyl carbonate)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-oligo
217 Moreira Teixeira LS, Bijl S, Pully VV et al. Self-attaching and cell- (acryloyl carbonate) copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011; 99:
attracting in situ forming dextran-tyramine conjugates hydrogels for 316–326.
arthroscopic cartilage repair. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 3164–3174. 237 Radhakrishnan J, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Hydrogel based
218 Gohil SV, Brittain SB, Kan H-M et al. Evaluation of enzymatically injectable scaffolds for cardiac tissue regeneration. Biotechnol Adv 2014;
crosslinked injectable glycol chitosan hydrogel. J Mater Chem B 2015; 3: 32: 449–461.
5511–5522. 238 Sepantafar M, Maheronnaghsh R, Mohammadi H et al. Stem cells and
219 Furtmuller PG, Zederbauer M, Jantschko W et al. Active site structure injectable hydrogels: synergistic therapeutics in myocardial repair.
and catalytic mechanisms of human peroxidases. Arch Biochem Biophys Biotechnol Adv 2016; 34: 362–379.
2006; 445: 199–213. 239 Kim M, Lee JY, Jones CN et al. Heparin-based hydrogel as a matrix for
220 Hou J, Li C, Guan Y et al. Enzymatically crosslinked alginate hydrogels encapsulation and cultivation of primary hepatocytes. Biomaterials
with improved adhesion properties. Polym Chem 2015; 6: 2204–2213. 2010; 31: 3596–3603.
221 Wang LS, Du C, Toh WS et al. Modulation of chondrocyte functions 240 Chen C, Wang L, Deng L et al. Performance optimization of injectable
and stiffness-dependent cartilage repair using an injectable enzymati- chitosan hydrogel by combining physical and chemical triple cross-
cally crosslinked hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties. Bioma- linking structure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013; 101: 684–693.
terials 2014; 35: 2207–2217. 241 Rodell CB, MacArthur JW, Dorsey SM et al. Shear-thinning supramo-
222 Jin R, Moreira Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ et al. Enzymatically crosslinked lecular hydrogels with secondary autonomous covalent crosslinking to
dextran-tyramine hydrogels as injectable scaffolds for cartilage tissue modulate viscoelastic properties in vivo. Adv Funct Mater 2015; 25:
engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 2429–2440. 636–644.
223 Zhang Y, Tao L, Li S et al. Synthesis of multiresponsive and dynamic 242 Pritchard CD, O'Shea TM, Siegwart DJ et al. An injectable thiol-acrylate
chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled release of bioactive molecules. poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel for sustained release of methylpredni-
Biomacromolecules 2011; 12: 2894–2901. solone sodium succinate. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 587–597.
224 Xin Y, Yuan J. Schiff's base as a stimuli-responsive linker in polymer 243 Fiorica C, Palumbo FS, Pitarresi G et al. Injectable in situ forming
chemistry. Polym Chem 2012; 3: 3045–3055. hydrogels based on natural and synthetic polymers for potential
225 Li Z, Yuan B, Dong X et al. Injectable polysaccharide hybrid hydrogels application in cartilage repair. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 19715–19723.
as scaffolds for burn wound healing. RSC Adv 2015; 5: 94248–94256. 244 Testa G, Di Meo C, Nardecchia S et al. Influence of dialkyne structure
226 Jia Y, Li J. Molecular assembly of Schiff Base interactions: construction on the properties of new click-gels based on hyaluronic acid. Int J
and application. Chem Rev 2015; 115: 1597–1621. Pharm 2009; 378: 86–92.
245 Kaga S, Yapar S, Gecici EM et al. Photopatternable “clickable” hydro- 265 Tan G, Wang Y, Li J et al. Synthesis and characterization of injectable
gels: “orthogonal” control over fabrication and functionalization. photocrosslinking poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels.
Macromolecules 2015; 48: 5106–5115. Polym Bull 2008; 61: 91–98.
246 DeForest CA, Polizzotti BD, Anseth KS. Sequential click reactions for 266 Chou AI, Akintoye SO, Nicoll SB. Photo-crosslinked alginate hydrogels
synthesizing and patterning three-dimensional cell microenvironments. support enhanced matrix accumulation by nucleus pulposus cells
Nat Mater 2009; 8: 659–664. in vivo. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2009; 17: 1377–1384.
247 Yang T, Long H, Malkoch M et al. Characterization of well-defined poly 267 Papadopoulos A, Bichara DA, Zhao X et al. Injectable and photo-
(ethylene glycol) hydrogels prepared by thiol-ene chemistry. J Polym Sci polymerizable tissue-engineered auricular cartilage using poly
Pol Chem 2011; 49: 4044–4054. (ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate copolymer hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part
248 Dong Y, Saeed AO, Hassan W et al. "One-step" preparation of thiol-ene A 2011; 17: 161–169.
clickable PEG-based thermoresponsive hyperbranched copolymer for 268 Ensrud KE. Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age.
in situ crosslinking hybrid hydrogel. Macromol Rapid Commun 2012; 33: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013; 68: 1236–1242.
120–126. 269 Borgstrom F, Lekander I, Ivergard M et al. The international costs and
249 Alge DL, Azagarsamy MA, Donohue DF et al. Synthetically tractable utilities related to osteoporotic fractures study (ICUROS)-quality of life
click hydrogels for three-dimensional cell culture formed using during the first 4 months after fracture. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 811–823.
tetrazine-norbornene chemistry. Biomacromolecules 2013; 14: 949–953. 270 Dosier CR, Uhrig BA, Willett NJ et al. Effect of cell origin and timing of
250 Cengiz N, Rao J, Sanyal A et al. Designing functionalizable hydrogels delivery for stem cell-based bone tissue engineering using biologically
through thiol-epoxy coupling chemistry. Chem Commun 2013; 49: functionalized hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A 2015; 21: 156–165.
11191–11193. 271 Khojasteh A, Fahimipour F, Eslaminejad MB et al. Development of
251 Arslan M, Gevrek TN, Sanyal A et al. Cyclodextrin mediated polymer PLGA-coated beta-TCP scaffolds containing VEGF for bone tissue
coupling via thiol-maleimide conjugation: facile access to functiona- engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 69: 780–788.
lizable hydrogels. RSC Adv 2014; 4: 57834–57841. 272 Matsuno T, Hashimoto Y, Adachi S et al. Preparation of injectable
252 Hermann CD, Wilson DS, Lawrence KA et al. Rapidly polymerizing 3D-formed β-tricalcium phosphate bead/alginate composite for bone
injectable click hydrogel therapy to delay bone growth in a murine re- tissue engineering. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 827–834.
synostosis model. Biomaterials 2014; 35: 9698–9708. 273 Han Y, Zeng Q, Li H et al. The calcium silicate/alginate composite:
253 Dong D, Li J, Cui M et al. In situ "clickable" zwitterionic starch-based Preparation and evaluation of its behavior as bioactive injectable
hydrogel for 3D cell encapsulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016; 8: hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2013; 9: 9107–9117.
4442–4455. 274 Ma G, Yang D, Li Q et al. Injectable hydrogels based on chitosan
254 Hacker MC, Nawaz HA. Multi-functional macromers for hydrogel derivative/polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate/N,N-dimethylacryla-
design in biomedical engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Mol mide as bone tissue engineering matrix. Carbohydr Polym 2010; 79:
Sci 2015; 16: 27677–27706. 620–627.
255 Kaga S, Gevrek TN, Sanyal A et al. Synthesis and functionalization of 275 Dessi M, Borzacchiello A, Mohamed TH et al. Novel biomimetic ther-
dendron-polymer conjugate based hydrogels via sequential thiol-ene mosensitive beta-tricalcium phosphate/chitosan-based hydrogels for
“click” reactions. J Polym Sci Pol Chem 2016; 54: 926–934. bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013; 101: 2984–2993.
256 Jeon O, Bouhadir KH, Mansour JM et al. Photocrosslinked alginate 276 Ding K, Zhang YL, Yang Z et al. A promising injectable scaffold: The
hydrogels with tunable biodegradation rates and mechanical proper- biocompatibility and effect on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchy-
ties. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 2724–2734. mal stem cells. Biotechnol Bioproc E 2013; 18: 155–163.
257 Ifkovits JL, Burdick JA. Review: photopolymerizable and degradable 277 Jang JY, Park SH, Park JH et al. In vivo osteogenic differentiation of
biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: human dental pulp stem cells embedded in an injectable in vivo-
2369–2385. forming hydrogel. Macromol Biosci 2016; 16: 1158–1169.
258 Zhou Y, Ma G, Shi S et al. Photopolymerized water-soluble chitosan- 278 Vo TN, Shah SR, Lu S et al. Injectable dual-gelling cell-laden composite
based hydrogel as potential use in tissue engineering. Int J Biol Mac- hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2016; 83: 1–11.
romol 2011; 48: 408–413. 279 Fu S, Guo G, Gong C et al. Injectable biodegradable thermosensitive
259 Hu J, Hou Y, Park H et al. Visible light crosslinkable chitosan hydrogels hydrogel composite for orthopedic tissue engineering. 1. Preparation
for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2012; 8: 1730–1738. and characterization of nanohydroxyapatite/poly(ethylene glycol)-
260 Elisseeff J, McIntosh W, Fu K et al. Controlled-release of IGF-I and poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel nanocomposites.
TGF-β1 in a photopolymerizing hydrogel for cartilage tissue engi- J Phys Chem B 2009; 113: 16518–16525.
neering. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 1098–1104. 280 Fu S, Ni P, Wang B et al. Injectable and thermo-sensitive PEG-PCL-PEG
261 Cho IS, Cho MO, Li Z et al. Synthesis and characterization of a new copolymer/collagen/n-HA hydrogel composite for guided bone
photo-crosslinkable glycol chitosan thermogel for biomedical applica- regeneration. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 4801–4809.
tions. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 144: 59–67. 281 Jiao Y, Gyawali D, Stark JM et al. A rheological study of biodegradable
262 Censi R, Schuurman W, Malda J et al. A printable photopolymerizable injectable PEGMC/HA composite scaffolds. Soft Matter 2012; 8:
thermosensitive p(HPMAm-lactate)-peg hydrogel for tissue engineer- 1499–1507.
ing. Adv Funct Mater 2011; 21: 1833–1842. 282 Huang Y, Zhang X, Wu A et al. An injectable nano-hydroxyapatite
263 Huang Z, Liu X, Chen S et al. Injectable and cross-linkable polypho- (n-HA)/glycol chitosan (G-CS)/hyaluronic acid (HyA) composite
sphazene hydrogels for space-filling scaffolds. Polym Chem 2015; 6: hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 33529–33536.
143–149. 283 Lin G, Cosimbescu L, Karin NJ et al. Injectable and thermosensitive
264 Kim HD, Heo J, Hwang Y et al. Extracellular-matrix-based and PLGA-g-PEG hydrogels containing hydroxyapatite: preparation,
Arg-Gly-Asp-modified photopolymerizing hydrogels for cartilage tis- characterization and in vitro release behavior. Biomed Mater 2012; 7:
sue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2015; 21: 757–766. 024107.
284 Yan J, Miao Y, Tan H et al. Injectable alginate/hydroxyapatite gel 291 Ren K, He C, Li G et al. In situ forming glycopolypeptide hydrogels as
scaffold combined with gelatin microspheres for drug delivery and biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J Control Release
bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 63: 2015; 213: E64–E65.
274–284. 292 Wang X, Partlow B, Liu J et al. Injectable silk-polyethylene glycol
285 Yamaguchi M, Weitzmann MN. Zinc stimulates osteoblastogenesis and hydrogels. Acta Biomater 2015; 12: 51–61.
suppresses osteoclastogenesis by antagonizing NF-kappaB activation. 293 Popa EG, Caridade SG, Mano JF et al. Chondrogenic potential of
Mol Cell Biochem 2011; 355: 179–186. injectable kappa-carrageenan hydrogel with encapsulated adipose stem
286 Niranjan R, Koushik C, Saravanan S et al. A novel injectable cells for cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen
temperature-sensitive zinc doped chitosan/beta-glycerophosphate Med 2015; 9: 550–563.
hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2013; 54: 294 Munarin F, Guerreiro SG, Grellier MA et al. Pectin-based injectable bio-
24–29. materials for bone tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2011; 12: 568–577.
287 Dhivya S, Saravanan S, Sastry TP et al. Nanohydroxyapatite-reinforced 295 Wu J, Ding Q, Dutta A et al. An injectable extracellular matrix
chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue repair in vitro and in vivo. derived hydrogel for meniscus repair and regeneration. Acta Biomater
J Nanobiotechnol 2015; 13: 40. 2015; 16: 49–59.
288 Douglas TE, Piwowarczyk W, Pamula E et al. Injectable self-gelling
composites for bone tissue engineering based on gellan gum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
hydrogel enriched with different bioglasses. Biomed Mater 2014; 9:
International License. The images or other third party material in
045014. this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated
289 Lewandowska-Łańcucka J, Fiejdasz S, Rodzik Ł et al. Bioactive otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative
hydrogel-nanosilica hybrid materials: a potential injectable scaffold for Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to
bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2015; 10: 015020. reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecom-
mons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
290 Vishnu Priya M, Sivshanmugam A, Boccaccini AR et al. Injectable
osteogenic and angiogenic nanocomposite hydrogels for irregular bone
defects. Biomed Mater 2016; 11: 035017. © The Author(s) 2017