Musical Achievement and The Self-Concept
Musical Achievement and The Self-Concept
Musical Achievement and The Self-Concept
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Sage Publications, Inc. and MENC: The National Association for Music Education are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Research in Music Education.
http://www.jstor.org
MusicalAchievement
and the Self-Concept
ing the behavior of any single person. Among the theorists and re-
searcherswho have held this view are Gordon Allport, Carl Rogers,
Henry StackSullivan,Earl Kelly, AbrahamMaslow,ArthurJersild, and
ArthurCombs.
Allport, in examining the concept of self in paperscollected in The
Nature of Personality,calls attention to the role that self-conceptplays in
human behaviorthroughcontemporaneousmotivation,active intention,
high-lenel integration of self-identitywith self-extension,and Xarious
cognitivedynamisms.2
The self is the centralconcept in Rogers'theoryof personality.3The
self consistsof conscious perceptionsas well as values of the "I" an(l
"me" developed out of the individual's interaction with his environ-
ment. The self constantlystrivesfor consistency,anelinfluencesthe indi-
vidual'sbehasior with its drives for actualization,maintenance,and en-
hancement. Of prime importancefor music educatorsis Roger'stheory
that the self introjects the values of other persons and may perceive
them in an unrealisticor distortedmanner. Experiencesnot consistent
with the self-structureare evaluatedas threats. Thus, a personwho per-
ceives himself as unmusicalwill react to attempts to improve his musi-
cianship through inner rebellion, negativism, or withdrawn behaior,
although he may outwardlyappear to accept attemptssIt impro^ement.
The self-conceptis learned. People learn about who they are and
what they are from the ways in which they have been treated by tllose
who have contact with them. Sullivan calls this "learning about self
from tlle mirrorof other people."4People denelop their self-conceptsin
music from the kinds of experiences they hase llael ill dealing with
music. It is logical to infer that to produce a positive self-conceptin
music, it is necessaryto provide experiencestllat show individuals they
are doing well in music.
The student'sself-appraisalis made in termsof what others think and
feel about him. If tlle "reflectedappraisals,"of WlliCh the self is made
up, are mainly derogatory,then the student's attitudes toward llimself
will be mainly derogatory.Witness the effect on self of SUCll statements
as tllese: "Pleasesing softer, Tom. You're spoiling the singing of the
others,"or "Sheila,let Sandratake your place in the dance while you
watch her. She'll show you how the beat really goes."
People learn that they are able, not from failure,but from success. To
feel acceptanceone must experienceacceptance. A positive view of self
is tlle direct result of successfulexperienceand accomplishment.
There is an ever-flowingimpact between the self and the continullm
of experiencesinvolved in the processof learning music at school. The
learnerperceives,interprets,receiveslresists,or rejectswhat he is tallght
in music in light of lliS self-system.In the normal courseof the (levelop-
The Nature of Personality (New York: Addison-Wesley, 1950).
2 Gordon W. Allport,
3Carl Rogers, Client-CenteredTherapy (New York: Houghton-Mifflin Co., 1951).
4 Henry Stack Sullivan, Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry (Washington, D.C.:
William Alanson White Psychiatric Foundation, 1947).
mprovec . slnglng.
The school chorus consistedof 84 students from the fourth, fifth, and
sixth grades,including 10 boys classifiedas untuned singers.6 Admission
to the chorus was primarily based upon the student's ability to sing
accurately,with good tone quality, and his interest in being in chorus.
All students in grades four through six were first asked to write down
whether they wished to be in chorus. Of the 152 students in grades four
through six, 112 answeredyes, including 10 of the 15 untuned singers
-all boys-within the three grades.
After consultationwith variousmembersof the school faculty, includ-
ing the school psychologist,it was decided to permit all 10 untuned
singers who wished to join the chorus to participate,as part of the ex-
periment. In order to determine how these untuned singers felt about
their own abilities to sing, a questionnairewas devised that attempted to
assesseach student'sself-conceptof his various abilities, including music.
Scores on self-assessmentin music averaged lower than all academic
areasexcept mathematics. As a result of this questionnaire,the writer is
5 J. W. Staines, "The Self-Pictureas a Factor in the Classroom,"British Journal of
Educational Psychology, XXVIII (June 1958), 97.
6 An untuned singer is defined as a student who cannot match a given pitch, has
difficultysinging any familiar tune, and has a maximum range of a major third.
CASEII-GRADE 4
W-has many problemsin relating to peers. He is not likedsbut is improving
in his relationship to boys. He is especially unable to relate to girls. He had
great diEculty in adjusting to a new school last year, but apparentlyhad even
more problemsin his formerschool. W-needs to be told many things that most
children his age alreadyknow. There is a great discrepancybetween his poten-
tial and actual achievement. His IQ is 134, but his Gates Reading level is 3.8,
with below averagescoreson the STEP tests. He is academicallyvery irrespon-
sible, and is unable to settle down or complete his work. W-thinks of himself
as a teenager, when actually he is less mature than most children his age.
Apparentlyhe has not been helped to see himself as he really is, or as others
see him.
Musical Progress. W-has continued problems in singing, but for the first
time since the writer has worked with him, he responded by singing the first
phraseof "ondon Bridge"accurately.
CASEIII-GRADE 4
C-is not too well liked by other boys, but is becomingmore acceptable. He
is very money-conscious,and often discussesquestionsabout saving and spending
money.He is pleasant,cooperative,and helpful about the room.He claspshis own
hands in victory when he is correct at answeringa question. The girls who sit
near him often complain about his language. He feels free to question what
he does not understanxl.Outwardly,he takes it in his stride when rejected by
his peers.C-has an IQ (WISC)of 120, but is reading on the third-gradelevel.
He is most interestedin social studies,science,and math and is not enthusiastic
about music. He apparentlyhas a low self-image. His self-conceptseems to be
improving as he finds successin his contributionsto discussions.
MusicalProgress. C-now sings accuratelyin pitch within a range of a tenth.
He is able to match pitches and tonal patterns, as well as sing familiar tunes
He sings surprisinglywell, with Ene tone quality.
CASEIV-GRADE 4
M-has no pronounced problems in any area. He is doing average work
academically.His work habits are excellent. He is very responsible,alert, and
attentive, and does not like to miss anything. His IQ is with a Gates 112J
lteading level of 4.8. His home backgroundmay not be as rich culturally and
intellectuallyas that of other children in the school.
AlusicalProgress. M-has definite problemsin singing on pitch and matching
tones. LittIe progressshown as a result of chorus experience.
CASE01-GRADE5
C-is an alert, happy boy who participatesactively in school activities and
discussions. He has a marveloussense of humor and enjoys talking to adults.
The group feels he talks too much. He is quite conscientiousin his work. He
is self-confidentand very secure with a good imagination. His IQ is 144
CASEVI-GRADE 5
N-seems to be liked by most
others. At times, however, children of the group. He
he becomes rather works well with
attitudehas caused uncompromising,and this
disagreementswith a few people.
thinkingwith those he works He
member.He has a good attitude with, and seems to be a usually shares his
responsiblegroup
thingsand graspsideasquickly. He towardschool. He is willing to learn new
Maturity) has an IQ of 131 (CaliforniaTest
and is achieing above
coordinated averageill all areas. He is not of Mental
as other boys his age, and as physically
ofhimself. He is seemsto tire fast. He is
somewhataware of his poor probablyunsure
generally
not sure whether he does physical coordination,but is
notnegative,althoughhis untuned well or not. His attitude towardmusic is
coorc.
CASE VII-GRADE 5
G- is usually included in
during activities with others. When he
free periods, it seems to be is not playing
with of his own choosing. He
others. At times he shows gets along well
immaturity,
responsibleand usually works diligently. but he can be reasonedwith. He is
slightly
above grade level on all tests He has an IQ of 125.
conceptof himself is probably of the STEP series except He scored
weak, although there is little writing. His
ofthis.He becomesvery outwardevidence
hurt when his work is
difficulty
acceptinghelp. Muchof discussedwith him. He has
inthelanguagearts area. He his workis generallyof poor quality,especially
astory thinks he has done an
if he adequatejob of
ill two or three
sentences. At times he has trouble writing
turns
the
lineof thought(luringa following
AIusical
discussion,and at times listening is
Progress. G- I10W sings on poor.
sing
almostany tune he knows pitch. He is able to
habits fairly well on pitch. He has match tones and
and his intonationis poor. very poor singing
CASE
VI II-GRADE6
L-isa quiet, reserstedchild.
to displaymore aggressiseHowexer,among the boys of his peer group he
tends
withgirls and with adults.traitswhen sportsare involved. He is extremely
shy
This
becausehe does not seek help shyness is a detriment to his academic
growth
his academicand emotional when he needs it. The main difficulty
limiting
his
successes growthstems from his inability
and failings. His successes
are highly dependentoll to accept
rather
than self-satisfaction,atld adult approval
his failings remain
uncorrecteduntil a(lult
CONCLUSIONS
It is hoped that many questions have been raised as a result of this
experiment. Some questionsin need of furtherclarificationare:
1. Oo untuned singersknow that they are singing inaccurately?
2. At what age or gradelevel should studentsbe told that they are off
pitch? (Perhapsthey should not be told!)
3. What is the correlation between academic achievement mtlsical
achievement and personalityfactors?
4. What are some remedial techniques useful with untuned singers
who are not sufferingfrom inability to discriminatepitch?
5. What is the effect on students who are excluded from special
groupsg
Music teachersneed to recognizethe importanceof building up the
self in their students. This can be done by: (a) accepting each con-
tribution that a student makes; (b) providing each student with an
opportunityto make an importantcontributionto the activity in which
the classis engaged;and (c) searchingconstantlyfor ways of expressing
the careone feels for each student. Studentslearn that they can succeed
not from failure, but from success. Music teaching must be of SUC}1
quality to guaranteesuccess. This is by no means an easy task. It is a
challenge,however,that can be met.
University of Hawaii