L 9 Public and Private Law

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the classification of public and private law under different branches.

The three branches of public law discussed are criminal law, administrative law, and constitutional law.

The three branches of private law discussed are property law, contract law, and tort law (civil wrongs).

LEGAL METHOD

PUBLIC & PRIVATE


LAW
L8
Dr. Kalpana
PUBLIC LAW Classification
of Law
3
Criminal Law BRANCHES
OF PUBLIC
LAW
Public Law
refers to the
“general
standards of
Administrative behaviour
expected in
Law society”

Constitutional
Law
CRIMINAL LAW
Laws (usually statute-based) restricting
behaviours which “harm” all members of
society

Classifications Examples
Crimes against the state Terrorism; treason
Crimes against persons Murder; assault; rape
Economic crimes (“white collar”) Tax evasion; fraud; computer hacking

Drug offences Possession (eg: of marijuana)


Driving offences Speeding; running red light
Public order offences Riot; public drunkenness
Crimes against property Theft; vandalism
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Relating to operation of the government and its


different departments
 Eg: Education Act
 Sets out the structure of the Board of Studies and
establishes the Board’s powers
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Relating to:
 Division of Powers (Federal / State laws)
 Separation of Powers (Parliament, Executive,
Judicature)

 High Court hears challenges


 ACT marriage equality
 Cases must be brought to the High Court’s
attention (High Court cannot decide to
investigate)
PRIVATE LAW Classification
of Law
3
Property Law BRANCHES
OF PRIVATE
LAW
Private Law
refers to the
“legal relations
between
individuals
Contract Law and/or
organisations”

Often referred
to as “civil
law”
Tort Law
(aka Civil
Wrongs)
PROPERTY LAW

Regulates the processes involved in buying or selling


any items
 Eg: Trade Practices Act 1974
Fair Trading Act 1987

 Both laws govern the behaviour of businesses involved in


property transactions
CONTRACT LAW

Controls behaviour and protects individuals who


have created a legally binding agreement with
one another
 Contracts can be written, verbal or implied,
but valid contracts must have:
 An “invitation to treat”
 An “offer”
 Consideration (i.e. benefit to both parties)
 Acceptance
 Both parties must enter a contract “in good
faith” (i.e. with the intention to act fairly)
TORT LAW
(CIVIL WRONGS)

 NOT criminal matters (even though many


people think of them this way)
 Involve incidents where one person has
inconvenienced or breached the rights of
another.

Negligence Nuisance Trespass Defamation


 Common tort
 Key concept is of ‘duty of care’
 Everyone has some legal responsibility to
ensure that they do not cause harm to others
NEGLIGENCE
or their property
 Established through the case Donoghue
v Stevenson (1932) [the snail in the
bottle]
 Mrs Donoghue met a friend in a café; the
friend bought drinks for them both – ginger D case
beer.
 The café owner poured some ginger beer Donogh
into Donoghue’s glass; Donoghue drank ue v
this, then poured the rest of the bottle.
 A half-rotted snail fell out of the bottle into Stevens
the glass. Donoghue became physically ill
as a result of this.
on
 Donoghue launched legal action against Mr (1932)
Stevenson, who made the ginger beer.
 Because Donoghue did not buy the drink, onoghu
the initial decision was that she had no ev
contract (either with the café or the
manufacturer) so could not sue. Stevens
 Donoghue appealed, and the case was
eventually heard in the British House of
on
Lords (1932)
 The judge decided that individuals should
be protected against products which are Donogh
not of an appropriate standard (and should
be able to seek remedy if they are harmed ue
in this way). v
 The judge also decided that there was an
implied contract between Stevenson and Stevens
Donoghue – it was reasonable for
Donoghue to expect that the drink she
on
consumed would be safe, even though she (1932)
did not purchase it herself.
 Stevenson, the softdrink manufacturer, was evenso
proven to have a duty of care to produce a n
product that was safe to drink.
(1932)
– FINAL
DECISI
ON
NUISANCE
 Involves one person interfering with
the rights of another
 Eg: a neighbour playing very loud
music late at night (causing a
nuisance)
TRESPASS
 Involves on person
interfering with the property
of another
 Usually involves entering
someone’s land without
permission
 Involves damaging another person’s
DEFAMATION
reputation
 Eg: publishing or broadcasting
misleading information about a person
AND this information damaging the
reputation of that person
 NOT defamation if:
 The information is true
 The person’s reputation is unharmed (i.e.
people don’t think less of them because of the
statement)

You might also like