Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: The Key Role of The Occlusal Plane
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: The Key Role of The Occlusal Plane
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: The Key Role of The Occlusal Plane
available at www.sciencedirect.com
Clinical contribution
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Patients with a Class III malocclusion generally present with a counterclockwise inclination
Received 7 April 2009 of the occlusal plane, converging with Camper’s line towards the front. This slope has an
Accepted 18 March 2010 effect on mandibular movement (forward posture) and on chewing mechanisms in general.
As dysfunctional mastication is likely to influence facial growth and inter-arch stability
Keywords: negatively, early orthopedic therapy of the occlusal unbalance concurrent with Class III
Class III malocclusion is justified. The aim of this article is to present a method of Class III treat-
Early orthopedic treatment ment based on a correct re-orientation of the occlusal plane in order to achieve an optimal
Occlusal plane masticatory mechanism, essential for stability of early treatment outcomes.
Orientation © 2010 Società Italiana di Ortodonzia (SIDO). Published by Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.
Mastication
∗
Corresponding author. Department of Dentofacial orthopedics, University Hospital 1, Place de l’Hôpital - 67091 Strasbourg, France.
E-mail address: RAYMOND.JEAN-LOUIS@wanadoo.fr (J.-L. Raymond).
1723-7785/$ – see front matter © 2010 Società Italiana di Ortodonzia (SIDO). Published by Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.012
54 progress in orthodontics 1 1 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 53–61
Fig. 1 – Endo-buccal views showing: a) lateral mandibular movements: to the right; b) MIO; c) lateral mandibular movements:
to the left; d) Thielemann’s formula: CG: condylar guide; IG: incisor guide; CH: cuspid height SC: spee curve; OP: occlusal plane.
Fig. 2 – a) Physiologic inclination of the OP (red line) is approximately parallel to Camper’s line (yellow). b) Class III
malocclusion: pathologic orientation of the OP backward and downward in comparison to Camper’s line (yellow).
progress in orthodontics 1 1 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 53–61 55
Fig. 3 – Class III malocclusion: a) during MIO; b) during lateral mandibular movement to the right; c) during lateral
mandibular movement to the left. The vertical and sagittal mandibular movements are excessive.
Fig. 5 – Schematic drawing showing the forces of mastication with (a) a well oriented OP (Angle class I); and (b) a poorly
oriented OP (Angle class III).
induced by posterior occlusal “interferences” related to the flat 2.2.2. Transverse orientation
orientation of the OP. This renders the anterior guide ineffec- The transverse maxillary hypo-development10,11 often associ-
tive from the point of view of proprioception, as there is no ated with Class III finds its expression in different ways (palatal
friction between upper and lower incisors. position of lateral incisors, retained permanent canines, etc.).
This unsatisfactory situation has two immediate conse- The choice to relieve the transverse constriction by extract-
quences for maxillo-facial development: ing teeth should be avoided as reducing the number of teeth
– increased stimulation of “propulsive structures” may is equivalent to reducing osseous volume and also the poten-
induce excess mandibular growth; tial perimeter of the arch. The latter is already under-sized,
– unfavorable orientation of the forces involved in mastica- increasing posterior interference during lateral mandibular
tion impairs the stability of the advanced position of the movements.
maxilla (Fig. 5). It is therefore necessary to carry out maxillary expansion
taking into account occlusal requirements. In all cases, it
is preferable to overcorrect the transverse dimension of the
2.2. Development of a treatment method that takes
maxilla.
into account the OP
Fig. 9 – Vertical displacement of the OP according to its length. In the deciduous dentition (a) clockwise rotation of the OP -
lower molar eruption is relatively weak compared to that necessary when second molars are present (b).
58 progress in orthodontics 1 1 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 53–61
Fig. 10 – Initial photographs taken on December 1998 (patient was 6 years and 3 months of age). a,b) Frontal and lateral
views of the face. c,d) Pretreatment intraoral views (anterior and posterior crossbite).
Fig. 12 – Intraoral views taken in November 2000 (9 months after the removal of the orthopedic appliance, a,b) and in
January 2001 c,d): 1) during lateral mandibular movement to the right; 2) during lateral mandibular movement to the left.
They show the upper incisors eruption and the setting up of a functional anterior guide.
Fig. 13a-c – Right, frontal, and left intraoral views taken 4 years and 11 months after orthopedic treatment. No over
appliance was used after the removal.
60 progress in orthodontics 1 1 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 53–61
Fig. 14 – a) Initial cephalometric radiograph before orthopedic treatment; b) cephalometric radiograph taken 4 years and 11
months after orthopedic treatment showing clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane.
3.2. Functional justification for early treatment the mandible in a posterior position (Fig. 5). Early re-
establishment of the anterior “guide” (and consequent
3.2.1. Stopping progression of unfavorable growth facilitation of inter-incisor friction) stimulates maxillary
Early normalization of mastication via reorientation of the OP development.
can yield two immediate consequences: Finally, early reorientation of the OP creates favorable con-
– it may reduce the pathologic growth mechanism that favors ditions for the eruption of posterior teeth. Their presence
mandibular development over that of the maxilla; in the arch helps physiologic mastication, while the direc-
– correction of the Class III skeletal base also requires tion of OP serves to consolidate the orthopedic correction.
normalization of muscular posture (labio-mental, lingual, For this reason, one could regard rehabilitation of physio-
velo-pharyngeal) and of orofacial functions (nasal ventila- logic mastication as a factor that reduces the likelihood of
tion, swallowing, mastication). relapse.3,9,14
The case report described in Figs 10 through 15 illustrates
3.2.2. Improvement of outcomes treatment modalities and outcomes for Class III correction.
Restoration of physiologic mastication by early treat- The author(s) declare that the work has been realized in
ment helps the effectiveness of therapy. The mechanisms agreement with the Helsinki Declaration principles and that
of alveolar growth determined by the forces of mas- the Informed Consent has been achieved from all the partici-
tication project the maxilla forward, while maintaining pants involved in the study.
Fig. 15 – Lateral view of the face: a) before orthopedic treatment; b) 4 years and 11 months after orthopedic treatment.
progress in orthodontics 1 1 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 53–61 61
references
4. Conclusions