Williamson 1983
Williamson 1983
Williamson 1983
Fig. 2. Muscle activity while subject was biting against splint with mandible in re-
truded contact position (centric relation). All muscles demonstrated electromyo-
graphic activity.
and 1 inch superior to the outer canthus of the eye. The occlusal splint with an acrylic resin bur until contact of
,location of the electrodes to the masseter muscles was the posterior teeth was established in eccentric move-
determined by palpation, and they were placed on ments. Then the tests with the second occlusal scheme
the body of the muscle midway between the origin were conducted.
and insertion. The subjects were comfortably seated Recordings were made of each subject without the
in an upright position. Recordings were printed with splint, using the same sequence to provide a standard
a paper speed of 10 cm/set and a microvoltage of for comparison.
500 pv.
All recordings were produced in the same sequence RESULTS
for both occlusal schemes. The subject was instructed to Anterior guidance provided by the splint
close firmly and maintain pressure against the splint Fig. 2 is a recording produced as subject C.B. was
while moving into right laterotrusion, back to retruded biting against the splint in the retruded contact position
contact position, into left laterotrusion, back to (centric relation). All recorded muscles demonstrate
retruded contact position, and then into protrusion. marked electromyographic activity.
Following the tests for the first occlusal scheme, the Fig. 3 demonstrates electromyographic activity as
anterior guidance was eliminated by adjusting the the same subject made a left laterotrusive movement
Fig. 4. Electromyogram made during a left laterotrusive movement with splint provid-
ing anterior guidance and posterior disclusion. Posterior disclusion was initiated as
indicated by vertical line. Reduced activity was recorded.
SOOAIV
I
.I sec.
Fig. 5. Electromyogram made while samesubject asin Fig. 4 executed a right latcrotru-
sive movement with natural dentition in contact. All muscleswere involved.
without the splint. The posterior teeth remained in with the posterior teeth in contact. There was continu-
contact during the movement. All musclescontinued to ous involvement of all musclesduring this movement.
respond with marked electromyographic activity. In Fig. 6, a right laterotrusive movement with the
The splint was reinserted and the subject instructed splint in position and occlusalcontact only on the right
to execute a left laterotrusive movement (Fig. 4). Once canine, a pattern similar to the left laterotrusive
movement was initiated, the only occlusal contact was movement with the splint was recorded. Once move-
betweenthe left canine and the splint. As the movement ment was initiated, the musclesof the laterotrusive side
was executed, there was an immediate decrease in showeda decreasein amplitude; but the decreasewas
electromyographic activity of all muscles.The greatest not as marked as that of the mediotrusive side. This
reduction of activity was seenin the right temporal and continuous activity at a decreasedamplitude on the
massetermuscles.There was a significant reduction in laterotrusive side was noted on four of the five subjects.
activity of the left temporal muscle. Some activity The four subjectshad a history of previous problems
continued in the left massetermuscle, but the ampli- associatedwith the temporomandibular joint.
tude was greatly reduced. Marked differenceswere noted between the electro-
Fig. 5 is the recording of the subjectC.B. executing a myographic activity of the involved muscles as the
right laterotrusive movement without the splint and subject madea protrusive movement without the splint
LHT MASSETER
I
500 yv
RfQiT -IS -I
.I sec.
RIQiT MASSETER
Fig. 9. This subject had a relatively good occlusion with few posterior contacts in
eccentric movements. Electromyogram shows decreasedactivity as most posterior teeth
discluded (vertical line) during left laterotrusive movement.
500
&Iv
_I
.I sec.
Fig. 10. When splint was inserted in samepatient as in Fig. 9 and all posterior teeth
discluded (vertical line), a dramatic decrease in electromyographic activity was
observed.
(Fig. 7) and with anterior guidance between the splint made during a left laterotrusive movement without a
and the upper anterior teeth (Fig. 8). Significant splint, and Fig. 10 is a recording with the splint
decreasein all muscleactivity was noted except for the providing anterior guidance.
left massetermuscle.It is postulated that splint therapy
prior to theserecordingswould have producedan effect Anterior guidance eliminated from the splint
that would have shown greater reduction in electro- When the anterior guidance of the splint was
myographic activity. eliminated, bilateral posterior contacts between the
Subject S.M. showed the pattern of electromyo- teeth remained during the laterotrusive, mediotrusive,
graphic activity associatedwith an individual who has and protrusive movements.A typical example of these
not had a history of temporomandibular joint involve- recordings is seen in Figs. 11 and 12. Fig. 11 is a
ment. This subject had an occlusion with an anterior recording madeof subjectJ.S. during a right laterotru-
guidance that allowed only minimal contacts of poste- sive movement with the splint providing anterior
rior teeth in eccentric movements.Fig. 9 is a recording guidance. Minimal electromyographic activity contin-
Fig. 11. Electromyogram made during an eccentric movement while splint provided
anterior guidance. Vertical line indicates disclusion of posterior teeth.
Fig. 12. With anterior guidance eliminated, no decreasein electrical activity occurred
for samepatient as in Fig. 11.
ued when the anterior guidance discludedthe posterior mediotrusive side as the patient moved into a left
teeth. No decreasein activity is observable in Fig. 12 laterotrusive position. Fig. 15 demonstrated that both
after the anterior guidancewas removed, except for the massetermusclescontinued to record high amounts of
right temporal muscle. electromyographic activity while the activity from both
Fig. 13 is the recording made during a protrusive temporal muscles was markedly reduced. Note the
movement with anterior guidance provided by the difference in Fig. 10, which showsthe muscleactivity
splint for subjectJ.S. When the anterior guidancewas while subjectSM. made a left laterotrusive movement
eliminated from the splint and posterior contacts with the splint providing anterior guidance and poste-
remained, greater activity in the muscleswas noted rior disclusion.
(Fig. 14). .
DISCUSSION
Canine contact versus posterior tooth contacts In a previous study reported by Williamson,+ 5
On one subject, S.M., with the splint positioned and symptomatic patients were treated using similar types
providing anterior guidance, one piece of shim stock of splints until the patients became asymptomatic.
0.0005 inch in thickness was placed over the right or Then electromyographic recordings were made. These
Fig, 13. Electromyogram made during a protrusive movement with anterior guidance
shows some decrease in activity.
Fig. 14. With anterior guidance removed, electromyogram for same patient as in Fig. 13
shows no decrease in activity for protrusive movement.
SOo&v
1
.I sec.
Fig. 15. With a piece of shim stock on right occlusal surface, electromyogram made
during a left laterotrusive movement shows that both masseter muscles remained
very active.