This document contains a student's responses to questions regarding the Satyam Computer Services fraud case. In response to the first question, the student explains that while Mr. B Ramalinga Raju began the fraud, over time additional persons within the company's promoters and family were also involved in insider trading and acquiring land through fraudulent means. In response to the second question, the student outlines the major ethical issues relating to finance in the case, including falsifying accounting records, tax evasion, and siphoning money from shareholders. In response to the third question, the student states that the audit and accounting functions at Satyam could have stopped the fiasco if they had not artificially inflated financial statements and the company's share
This document contains a student's responses to questions regarding the Satyam Computer Services fraud case. In response to the first question, the student explains that while Mr. B Ramalinga Raju began the fraud, over time additional persons within the company's promoters and family were also involved in insider trading and acquiring land through fraudulent means. In response to the second question, the student outlines the major ethical issues relating to finance in the case, including falsifying accounting records, tax evasion, and siphoning money from shareholders. In response to the third question, the student states that the audit and accounting functions at Satyam could have stopped the fiasco if they had not artificially inflated financial statements and the company's share
This document contains a student's responses to questions regarding the Satyam Computer Services fraud case. In response to the first question, the student explains that while Mr. B Ramalinga Raju began the fraud, over time additional persons within the company's promoters and family were also involved in insider trading and acquiring land through fraudulent means. In response to the second question, the student outlines the major ethical issues relating to finance in the case, including falsifying accounting records, tax evasion, and siphoning money from shareholders. In response to the third question, the student states that the audit and accounting functions at Satyam could have stopped the fiasco if they had not artificially inflated financial statements and the company's share
This document contains a student's responses to questions regarding the Satyam Computer Services fraud case. In response to the first question, the student explains that while Mr. B Ramalinga Raju began the fraud, over time additional persons within the company's promoters and family were also involved in insider trading and acquiring land through fraudulent means. In response to the second question, the student outlines the major ethical issues relating to finance in the case, including falsifying accounting records, tax evasion, and siphoning money from shareholders. In response to the third question, the student states that the audit and accounting functions at Satyam could have stopped the fiasco if they had not artificially inflated financial statements and the company's share
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
SUBJECT: BUSINESS ETHICS
JLUID: JLU05126 COURSE CODE: MBAC20301 ROLL NO: 2020MBA030 INTERNAL 1
Submitted by: Submitted to:
Khushboo Chouhan Dr. Anuja Akhouri Que1: Is only Mr. B Ramalinga Raju responsible for Satyam’s fiasco? Ans: On January 7, 2009, Mr. B Ramalinga Raju admitted to his crime and cleared all top Satyam employees, stating that they had no idea what he was doing to orchestrate the intricate fraud of Rs. 7800 crores on Satyam's financial sheet. However, along with Mr. B Ramalinga Raju, the company's promoters were also involved in Insider Trading of the company's shares in order to acquire funds for the construction of a big land bank. Mr. B Ramalinga Raju began this fraud, but as time passed, additional persons were involved with him. Mr. B Ramalinga Raju gathered the finances to purchase the property on behalf of 330 corporations and around 30 individuals. They all possessed equity in these firms, 327 of which were related to the family. Que2: What are the major ethical issues relating to finance involved in this case? Ans: In this case, Ramalinga Raju, the chairman of Satyam, is a classic example of unethical business practices in the sector. He was purely motivated by a desire for money and territory. He aspired to compete with India's top three IT firms (Infosys, TCS and WIPRO). Raju picked the simplest, yet most immoral, methods to achieve his objectives. For nine years, he falsified the accounting records, evaded taxes, and syphoned money from shareholders by creating fictitious clients, account salaries, and invoices. Ramalinga Raju demonstrated his company's excellent financial health and drew funds from shareholders to purchase land. He had, ironically, won the Golden Peacock Global Award for Good Corporate Governance. In addition, Satyam was forbidden from doing business for eight years by the World Bank in December 2008 for delivering "improper benefits" to Bank employees. As a result, the company's ethical standards were poor. Satyam's balance statement as of September 7, 2008 contained an accrued interest of Rs. 376 crores, which was non- existent, according to SFIO's findings. The company had given the impression that its fixed deposits were roughly Rs 3318.37 crore, when in fact it only had about Rs 9.96 crores in FDRs. One of the most common sources of fraud at Satyam was the exaggeration of personnel numbers. While founder and chairman Raju stated that the company had 53,000 employees, the actual figure was slightly more than 40,000. The phoney figure was only possible because payment to the remaining 10,000 employees was forged year after year - an operation that clearly entailed the formation of sham organizations with a huge number of employees. Que3: Who & how could have stopped this fiasco? Ans: In this case, the audit and accounting functions of Satyam Computer Service can put a stop to this debacle. Both departments (audit and accounting) of Satyam were done in a deceptive and opaque manner in order to artificially enhance the company's share price. Both departments are aware that this has resulted in the collapse of investors. A week before B Ramalinga Raju's sensational confession, PwC, Satyam's auditors from 2000 to 2008, revealed that its audit report was incorrect because it was based on incorrect financial statements submitted by Satyam management. If the audit and accounting departments did not artificially inflate the -company's share price at the time. Then, maybe this fraud will never be happened.