Conflict Resolution Peace Building Lectures Notes
Conflict Resolution Peace Building Lectures Notes
Conflict Resolution:
Contents
Definition of Peace
What Is Conflict Resolution?
The Conflict Resolution Process
Types of Conflict Resolution Skills
Assertiveness
Interviewing and Active Listening
Empathy
Facilitation
Mediation
Creative Problem Solving
Accountability
More Conflict Resolution Skills
Examples of Conflict Resolution Skills
Steps in Conflict Resolution
Conflict Resolution Strategies
Peace building
Definition oh peace
What is peace building
Peace building Principles
What contributes to peace?
How to promote peace
Ways to support youth inclusion in peace building
Conflict resolution skills are required for a wide range of positions across many job sectors.
This requirement is based around the fact that conflict tends to reduce productivity and
create a difficult work environment, leading to unwanted turnover in staff and reduced
morale.
Individuals who are able to resolve conflicts are often excellent mediators, rational,
and able to manage difficult personalities from a place of empathy.
Conflict resolution is the process by which two or more parties reach a peaceful resolution
to a dispute.1
Some conflicts are essentially arbitrary, meaning it doesn’t matter who “wins,” only that the
problem is resolved so everyone can get back to work.
But some conflicts reflect real disagreements about how an organization should function.
The resolution of conflicts in the workplace typically involves some or all of the following
processes:
1 Assertiveness
A supervisor might take the initiative to convene a meeting between two employees who
have engaged in a public dispute. An employee might seek out a person with whom they're
having conflict to suggest working together to find ways to co-exist more peacefully.
Articulate
Balanced Approach
Candor
Decisive
Delegation
Fact-Based
Fair
Firm
Leadership
Manages Emotions
Management
Negotiating
Sociable
Voices Opinions
Problem-Solving
Self-Control
Stress-Management
Articulate
Attentiveness
Conscientiousness
Considerate
Empathy
Encouraging
Intuitive
Listening
Negotiation
Nonverbal Communication
Persuasion
Predicting
Presentation
Professional
Relationship Building
Respectful
Sense of Humor
Sincere
Sociable
Understanding
Verbal communication
3 Empathy
A mediator might encourage empathy by asking employees in conflict to each describe how
the other might be feeling and thinking, and how the situation might look to the other party.
Empathy is also an important skill for mediators, who must be able to understand each
party’s perspective, without necessarily agreeing with either.
4 Facilitation
Managers of rival departments might facilitate a joint brainstorming session with their
teams to generate solutions to ongoing points of conflict. Group facilitation techniques can
also be used to avoid triggering conflict during group decision-making, in the first place.
Brainstorming
Collaboration
Conflict Management
Diplomatic
Ethical
Humble
Influential
Insightful
Intuitive
Listening
Organized
Patience
Perceptive
Planning
Practical
Realistic
Reflective
Teamwork
5 Mediation
A supervisor might guide subordinates who are in conflict through a process to identify
mutually agreeable changes in behavior.
Assertive
Compassionate
Decision Making
Emotional Intelligence
Empathy
Honesty
Impartial
Insightful
Leadership
Measured
Patience
Problem Solving
Professional
Psychology Background
Rational Approach
Respect
Understanding
Transparency
A supervisor might redefine the roles of two conflict-prone staff to simply eliminate points
of friction. Creativity can also mean finding new win/win solutions.
Brainstorming Solutions
Conflict Analysis
Collaborating
Critical Thinking
Convening Meetings
Creativity
Critical Thinking
Decision Making
Designating Sanctions
Fair Resolution
Goal Integration
Monitoring Process
Nonverbal Communication
Problem Solving
Restoring Relationships
Sense of Humor
Verbal Communication
7 Accountability
Adaptable
Collaboration
Delegation
Driven
Dynamic
Flexible
Focus
Follow-through
Honesty
Integrity
Leadership
Motivation
Organized
Planning
Results-Oriented
Visionary
Trustworthy
Versatile
Accepting Criticism
Assertive
Avoid Punishing
Being Present
Calmness
Data-Driven
Impartiality
Intuitive
Leadership
Let It Go
Logical
Non-Bias
Patience
Positivity
Prioritize Relationships
Project Management
Research
Respect Differences
Separating Yourself
Stress Management
Technical Expertise
Conflict management is one of the core training courses we offer for managers and
supervisors. Learning how to handle disputes efficiently is a necessary skill for anyone in
management and the key to preventing it from hindering employees' professional growth.
Here is the conflict resolution process in five steps.
Step 1: Define the source of the conflict.
The more information you have about the cause of the problem, the more easily you can
help to resolve it. To get the information you need, use a series of questions to identify the
cause, like, “When did you feel upset?” “Do you see a relationship between that and this
incident?” “How did this incident begin?”
As a manager or supervisor, you need to give both parties the chance to share their side of
the story. It will give you a better understanding of the situation, as well as demonstrate
your impartiality. As you listen to each disputant, say, “I see” or “uh huh” to acknowledge
the information and encourage them to continue to open up to you.
Often, it is not the situation but the point of view of the situation that causes anger to
fester and ultimately leads to a shouting match or other visible and disruptive result.
The source of the conflict might be a minor issue that occurred months before, but the level
of stress has grown to the point where the two parties have begun attacking each other
personally instead of addressing the real problem. In the calm of your office, you can get
them to look beyond the triggering incident to see the real cause. Once again, probing
questions will help, like, “What do you think happened here?” or “When do you think the
problem between you first arose?
After getting each party’s viewpoint, the next step is to get them to identify how the
situation could be changed. Again, question the parties to solicit their ideas: “How can you
make things better between you?”As mediator, you have to be an active listener, aware of
every verbal nuance, as well as a good reader of body language.
You want to get the disputants to stop fighting and start cooperating, and that means
steering the discussion away from finger pointing and toward ways of resolving the conflict.
You are listening for the most acceptable course of action. Point out the merits of various
ideas, not only from each other’s perspective, but in terms of the benefits to the
organization. For instance, you might suggest the need for greater cooperation and
collaboration to effectively address team issues and departmental problems.
Step 5: Agreement.
The mediator needs to get the two parties to shake hands and accept one of the alternatives
identified in Step 4. The goal is to reach a negotiated agreement. Some mediators go as far
as to write up a contract in which actions and time frames are specified. However, it might
be sufficient to meet with the individuals and have them answer these questions: “What
action plans will you both put in place to prevent conflicts from arising in the future?” and
“What will you do if problems arise in the future?
1: Avoiding
Avoiding is when people just ignore or withdraw from the conflict. They choose this method
when the discomfort of confrontation exceeds the potential reward of resolution of the
conflict. While this might seem easy to accommodate for the facilitator, people aren’t really
contributing anything of value to the conversation and may be withholding worthwhile
ideas. When conflict is avoided, nothing is resolved.
2: Competing
Competing is used by people who go into a conflict planning to win. They’re assertive and
not cooperative. This method is characterized by the assumption that one side wins and
everyone else loses. It doesn’t allow room for diverse perspectives into a well informed total
picture. Competing might work in sports or war, but it’s rarely a good strategy for group
problem solving.
Debra wrote an illuminating article on how conflict resolution failure can lead to revolution.
It’s what can happen when people feel like they aren’t being listened to and start being
assertive.
3: Accommodating
Accommodating is a strategy where one party gives in to the wishes or demands of another.
They’re being cooperative but not assertive. This may appear to be a gracious way to give in
when one figures out s/he has been wrong about an argument. It’s less helpful when one
party accommodates another merely to preserve harmony or to avoid disruption. Like
avoidance, it can result in unresolved issues. Too much accommodation can result in groups
where the most assertive parties commandeer the process and take control of most
conversations.
4: Collaborating
Collaborating is the method used when people are both assertive and cooperative. A group
may learn to allow each participant to make a contribution with the possibility of co-
creating a shared solution that everyone can support.
A great way to collaborate and overcome conflict is to reach out and touch them.
5: Compromising
Another strategy is compromising, where participants are partially assertive and
cooperative. The concept is that everyone gives up a little bit of what they want, and no one
gets everything they want. The perception of the best outcome when working by
compromise is that which “splits the difference.” Compromise is perceived as being fair,
even if no one is particularly happy with the final outcome.
Conflict resolution is a complex process that needs a strategic approach. Implementing the
right conflict resolution steps can be the difference between a happy workforce and a toxic
one.
Your conflict resolution efforts are vital to promote unity, collaboration, and cohesion in a
team. Any wrong measure might be detrimental to the team that will ultimately harm the
organization. That is why it is imperative that every good leader knows how to handle
conflicts within the workplace.
This article will discuss some critical and necessary conflict resolution steps you can take to
resolve dispute in the workplace.
When disputes in an organization are not resolved timely, it can take a drastic turn and
create a hostile work environment. It affects harmony, hampers productivity, and
decreases performance. However, any problem between employees can be solved with the
right approach and the right measures. Here is a list of the crucial steps to resolve a conflict
in the organization.
The second conflict resolution step will needs you to evaluate the situation and the position
you are in as a manager before you settle any disagreement between employees. Figuring
out the conflict source is essential; however, assessing the situation is another crucial aspect
that you shouldn’t ignore.
A conflict may have occurred long before, but the tension between both might be
detrimental in the long run.
For both sides, it can be destructive in terms of their morale and performance. Try to study
the body language, tone of voice, and interaction between your team members to identify
the symptoms of a conflict and control the situation in a timely fashion.
Your efforts towards having a definite conflict resolution steps will not be fruitful if you
cannot come up with a definite solution. Do keep in mind that the solutions you will resort
to have to be neutral, effective, and just for both parties.
Any kind of resolution needs thoughtful thinking, good emotional intelligence, and
competent leadership skills. Brainstorm the necessary decisions you will take and effectively
implement according to the situation. Every dispute will require a different set of resolution
skills.
Be mindful of the team’s behaviors and the emotional state of your employees before
taking any action.
To bring the best out of a one-on-one conversation, actively listen to what the involved
parties have to say. Relate to each conversation that will broaden your perspective, which
will help you get a better grip of how serious the conflict has become.
The conflict resolution process demands good communication between all the involved
parties so that the situation can be dealt with quickly.
To work together and reduce any chances of a dispute, it is pivotal that they have the same
vision and goals. As a manager, take regular feedback on how things are going while
regulating collaborative jobs.
If you feel that a dispute is building up, take decisive action and settle any associated
problems. It will maintain team harmony, and the unity will stay intact.
When an organization's employees do not have high levels of satisfaction, there is a risk that
disputes will often develop. It is an essential factor that you need to keep in mind while
trying to resolve any conflict.
Employees who are not satisfied at their job are stressed, lack motivation, get irritated, and
refuse to collaborate. As teamwork is a critical aspect of team success, it may develop a
conflict between team members.
However, to tackle such issues, you must increase your efforts to elevate employee
satisfaction as a leader. Give timely recognition, reward them frequently, and publicly
acknowledge their efforts. It will boost their confidence to perform better and improve their
overall morale in the workplace. That reduces the chances of disputes and helps to maintain
high team cohesion.
Methods of Resolving Conflict:
Conflict is an everyday part of life in the UK Grocery Industry. Discounters are growing. New
stores are hard to come by. Employees want salary raises. Bosses want bonuses. Shoppers
expect value for money. Resolving conflict is, therefore, an essential part of life in the UK
Grocery Industry. Here are 8 methods of conflict resolution – Do you know all your options?
1. Unilateral Decision
No, we’re not giving in, that’s it’. We’ve all heard the stories of a big brand and a
supermarket getting to the point where one has decided to delist the product or stop the
supply of the product until the other party yields.
Advantage: Shows strength and resolve.
Disadvantage: The other party may call your bluff and it is not good for long-term
relationships.
2. Persuasion
‘It’s a no-brainer, you should do it’. Persuading someone to do something that they may
not want to do is undoubtedly a skill that can be learnt. To illustrate, some top tips from
the experts are 1. Actively listen to their point, 2. Find common ground, and 3. Use the
power of ‘because’.
3. Haggling/Bartering
‘I’ll meet you halfway’. Most of us haggle when we go to the markets, where it is the norm.
In the UK we sometimes haggle when we want to agree on something and we believe we
are negotiating, but we are not, we are haggling.
Advantage: Haggling is a sound method for conflict resolution, but don’t believe that
it is negotiating.
Disadvantage: It will cost you ‘meeting halfway’.
4. Arbitration
‘Ok, let’s ask them for their opinion’. Not something we hear much of in the UK Grocery
Industry unless the ‘Competitions and Markets Authority’ are involved. Occasionally you
might hear, ‘Let’s get another perspective on this’, which is very valid.
5. Postponement
‘We’ll come back to this at the next meeting with a plan’. Our observations of learners on
our negotiation skills training course, for instance, is that most people looking to resolve a
conflict opt for agreeing that a plan will be presented at the next meeting. This is usually a
postponement where the two parties come back to the original points once again, with,
again little resolution.
Advantage: Sometimes a postponement allows people to ‘cool off’ and/or revisit the
problem another way.
Disadvantage: Postponements that are used to get away from dealing with the
problem are not useful in resolving the conflict.
6. Problem Solve
‘I’ve got an idea, how about if we…?’. Problem-solving is where the majority of conflict
resolution takes place.
7. Total Surrender
‘Ok, we’ll agree to the deal’. Total Surrender is where one party gives in to the other party
by giving up, waving the white flag, and agreeing to the other party’s demands.
Advantage: The advantages of this method are limited; as a result, they are likely
reduced to the chance that you might get some payback in a later deal.
Disadvantage: You lose the lot!
8. Negotiation
‘If you…then I…’. This tool is very simple and is a must in any negotiators’ toolbox. If you do
something for me, then I will do something for you. We see negotiating as trading. Yes,
there’ s a lot more to it. Essentially, therefore, it is about ‘giving to get’. Trading what you
have for what they have to get and aiming for a win:win outcome.
PEACE BUILDING
What is peace ?
Peace means dignity, well-being for all, not just absence of war – UN officials. ... In
September 1999, the Assembly adopted, by consensus, a resolution on the Declaration and
Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace.
What is peace building?
Peacebuilding is about dealing with the reasons why people fight in the first place and
supporting societies to manage their differences and conflicts without resorting to
violence.
It aims to prevent the outbreak, escalation, continuation and recurrence of violence, so can
take place before, during and after conflicts.
Peace building approaches often refer to ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ peace. This is used to
denote a transition from violence to peace, which can be seen in two phases: improved
stability and ‘positive peace’.
Stability means the absence of violence, when people can get on with their lives after the
fighting stops. This return to normality is welcome. But stability frequently masks the reality
that grievances or other causes of conflict have not been addressed and may erupt again.
Because of this, this period has been dubbed ‘negative peace’, which helps explain why a
third or more of peace agreements break down.
The challenge is to use periods of stability to build longer-term, ‘positive’ peace. This means
achieving improvements in governance, and in fair access to economic opportunities,
justice, safety and other aspects of wellbeing, such as health, education and a decent
environment in which to live.
These are the factors that, taken together, provide people with the resilience that allows
them to deal with their differences and conflicts without violence.
Peacebuilding approaches and methods are varied and diverse, but they all ultimately work
to ensure that people are safe from harm, have access to law and justice, are included in the
political decisions that affect them, have access to better economic opportunities, and enjoy
better livelihoods.
The term peacebuilding was brought to international attention in 1992, when former UN
Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali announced his ‘An Agenda for Peace(this link will open in a
new window)’.
Older people often remember the old days, and young people would prefer to think
more about the present and look to the future. The older generation finds it hard to
forget old wounds and grievances, and young people can start from a clean sheet.
Georgian youth
Even against tremendous challenges, youth are actively engaging in their communities,
and are making positive contributions to peace. Unfortunately, they are facing
numerous barriers to participating in formal and informal peace processes. This
includes a lack of trust in governments and political institutions; voicelessness based on
identities including age, as well as threats of violence and radicalisation. Women and
girls face additional challenges when it comes to exclusion from public spaces.
Because youth are both actors and victims in South Sudan conflicts they are the only
capable force to implement the peace agreements.
Young person in rural South Sudan
Conciliation Resources was invited by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
to contribute to the Progress Report on UNSCR 2250. Between July and September
2017, Conciliation Resources conducted participatory research with 494 young people
living in Afghanistan, Jammu and Kashmir, South Sudan, the Georgian- Abkhaz context,
and among youth of the Ogaden diaspora living in the United Kingdom.
Five key findings emerged on how young people can play a greater role in
peacebuilding:
For me when there is no firing and shelling, it is peace. When children do not become
victims of mine blasts in my village, it is peace. When I see my mother going to the
fields to collect wood and graze animals, it is peace. When I see children playing in the
common fields or grounds then I consider it peace.
Young person in Azad Jammu and Kashmir.
We have few opportunities to act politically outside the house, let alone take part in the
peace process on either a local or national level.
Young Afghan woman
The only thing that can ensure us a better future is education... Without education, the
country will not have a future.
Young Azeri woman living in Georgia