Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 31 views

    One Way Anova: SUM 175 195 153 Mean

    Uploaded by

    Nelson Maraguinot
    An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze differences in the number of days three ballpen brands (A, B, C) were used. The test found a significant difference between the brands (F=42.03, p<0.0000037995946). Follow-up Scheffe's tests showed significant differences between all brand pairs (A vs B, A vs C, B vs C), indicating the number of days each brand was used differed significantly. Therefore, the null hypothesis that there is no difference in usage among brands is rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    One Way Anova: SUM 175 195 153 Mean

    Uploaded by

    Nelson Maraguinot
    31 views4 pages
    An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze differences in the number of days three ballpen brands (A, B, C) were used. The test found a significant difference between the brands (F=42.03, p<0.0000037995946). Follow-up Scheffe's tests showed significant differences between all brand pairs (A vs B, A vs C, B vs C), indicating the number of days each brand was used differed significantly. Therefore, the null hypothesis that there is no difference in usage among brands is rejected.

    Original Title

    NUMBER 2 Sheila

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze differences in the number of days three ballpen brands (A, B, C) were used. The test found a significant difference between the brands (F=42.03, p<0.0000037995946). Follow-up Scheffe's tests showed significant differences between all brand pairs (A vs B, A vs C, B vs C), indicating the number of days each brand was used differed significantly. Therefore, the null hypothesis that there is no difference in usage among brands is rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    31 views4 pages

    One Way Anova: SUM 175 195 153 Mean

    Uploaded by

    Nelson Maraguinot
    An ANOVA test was conducted to analyze differences in the number of days three ballpen brands (A, B, C) were used. The test found a significant difference between the brands (F=42.03, p<0.0000037995946). Follow-up Scheffe's tests showed significant differences between all brand pairs (A vs B, A vs C, B vs C), indicating the number of days each brand was used differed significantly. Therefore, the null hypothesis that there is no difference in usage among brands is rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    2 ONE WAY ANOVA

    Anova: Single Factor


    BRAND A BRAND B BRAND C
    36 37 31 SUMMARY
    35 38 32 Groups Count Sum
    37 39 29 BRAND A 5 175
    34 40 30 BRAND B 5 195
    33 41 31 BRAND C 5 153
    SUM 175 195 153
    MEAN 35 39 30.6
    ANOVA
    Source of Variation SS df
    Between Groups 176.5333 2
    Within Groups 25.2 12

    Total 201.7333 14

    Hypothesis
    Ho: Is there significant difference in the number of days of using among the three brands of ballpen?
    H1: There is a significant difference in the number of days of using among the three brands of ballpen.

    Findings:
    Computed Value < Tabular Value
    Accept the null hypothesis

    Conclusion
    There is no significant difference in the number of days of using among the three brands of ballpen.
    Scheffe' Test
    Pairwise Comparison Fs(numerator)
    Brand A Brand B 16
    Brand A Brand C 19.36
    Average Variance Brand B Brand C 70.56
    35 2.5
    39 2.5 The above table show that there is significant differecence between
    30.6 1.3

    MS F P-value F crit
    88.26667 42.03175 0.0000037995946 3.885294
    2.1

    s of ballpen.
    ffe' Test
    Fs(denominator) Fs Fs CV Interpretattion
    0.84 19.05 7.77 Significant
    0.84 23.05 7.77 Significant
    0.84 84 7.77 Significant

    s significant differecence between Brand A and Brand B, Brand A and Brand C and Brand B and C. Therefore all brands of ballpen are e
    efore all brands of ballpen are equal in number of being use.

    You might also like