MGN578 Ca 3
MGN578 Ca 3
MGN578 Ca 3
1
Soft copy of case study will be provided to respective groups and you need to collaborate with each other.
Evaluation-Rubric
I. CONTENT
Parameters Marks Excellent Good (60% Fair (40% to Poor (0 to
(80%-100%) to 80%) 60%) 40%)
Identification of the 2 Identifies & Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and
Main understands Understands Understands understands
Issues/Problems all of the main most of the some of the few of the
issues in the main issues in issues in the case issues in case
case study the case study study study
Marks Parameters
8-10 1. Student is a proactive participant showing a balance between listening, initiating, and
focusing discussion.
2. Displays a proactive use of the whole range of discussion skills to keep discussion going
and to involve everyone in the group.
3. Understands the purpose of the discussion and keeps the discussion focused and on topic.
Applies logics, knowledge, confidence, showing leadership and sensitivity.
6-8 1. Student is an active participant showing a balance between listening, initiating, and
focusing discussion.
2. Demonstrates all the elements of discussion skills but uses them less frequently and with
less Confidence than the above level.
3. Keeps the discussion going but more as a supporter than a leader. Tries to involve
everyone in the group.
4. Demonstrates logic and knowledge but lacks the confidence to pursue them so that the
group takes longer than necessary to reach consensus.
5. Demonstrates a positive approach but is more focused on getting done than on having a
positive discussion.
4-6 1. Student is an active listener but defers easily to others and tends not pursue personal point
of view, lacking confidence.
2. Limits discussion skills to asking questions, summarizing and staying on topic.
3. Rarely demonstrates analysis skills and logics because doesn’t understand the
purpose of the discussion, and as a result, offers little evidence to support any point of view.
2-4 1.Student shows effort and is willing to be involved in the discussion but lacks the skills to
get involved.
2. Asks clarifying questions as the main discussion skill.
3. Passively tries to find resources e.g. flipping through notes.
4. Lacks participation, logics resulting in little evidence with which to assess
skills.
0-2 1. Student demonstrates no participation or effort.
2. Participates only when prompted by the teacher. Only responds to others and
initiates nothing.
3. Provides limited responses that are often off topic.
4. Participates minimally so that it is impossible to assess analysis skills or
understanding of the issues.
Groups